Skip to main content

Articles

8013 result(s) for 'evolutionary biology' within Genome Biology

Page 31 of 161

  1. Transposable elements (TEs) have colonized the genomes of most metazoans, and many TE-embedded sequences function as cis-regulatory elements (CREs) for genes involved in a wide range of biological processes from ...

    Authors: Cyril Pulver, Delphine Grun, Julien Duc, Shaoline Sheppard, Evarist Planet, Alexandre Coudray, Raphaël de Fondeville, Julien Pontis and Didier Trono
    Citation: Genome Biology 2023 24:258
  2. Whole-genome sequences are now available for many microbial species and clades, however existing whole-genome alignment methods are limited in their ability to perform sequence comparisons of multiple sequence...

    Authors: Todd J Treangen, Brian D Ondov, Sergey Koren and Adam M Phillippy
    Citation: Genome Biology 2014 15:524
  3. Androgen receptor (AR) is critical to the initiation, growth, and progression of prostate cancer. Once activated, the AR binds to cis-regulatory enhancer elements on DNA that drive gene expression. Yet, there ...

    Authors: Chia-Chi Flora Huang, Shreyas Lingadahalli, Tunc Morova, Dogancan Ozturan, Eugene Hu, Ivan Pak Lok Yu, Simon Linder, Marlous Hoogstraat, Suzan Stelloo, Funda Sar, Henk van der Poel, Umut Berkay Altintas, Mohammadali Saffarzadeh, Stephane Le Bihan, Brian McConeghy, Bengul Gokbayrak…
    Citation: Genome Biology 2021 22:149

Annual Journal Metrics

  • Citation Impact 2023
    Journal Impact Factor: 10.1
    5-year Journal Impact Factor: 16.5
    Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 2.521
    SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 7.197

    Speed 2023
    Submission to first editorial decision (median days): 22
    Submission to acceptance (median days): 277

    Usage 2023
    Downloads: 6,688,476
    Altmetric mentions: 12,515

Peer Review Taxonomy

This journal is participating in a pilot of NISO/STM's Working Group on Peer Review Taxonomy, to identify and standardize definitions and terminology in peer review practices in order to make the peer review process for articles and journals more transparent. Further information on the pilot is available here.

The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal:

  • Identity transparency: Single anonymized
  • Reviewer interacts with: Editor
  • Review information published: Review reports. Reviewer Identities reviewer opt in. Author/reviewer communication

We welcome your feedback on this Peer Review Taxonomy Pilot. Please can you take the time to complete this short survey.