Skip to main content

Genetic basis of geographical differentiation and breeding selection for wheat plant architecture traits

Abstract

Background

Plant architecture associated with increased grain yield and adaptation to the local environments is selected during wheat (Triticum aestivum) breeding. The internode length of individual stems and tiller length of individual plants are important for the determination of plant architecture. However, few studies have explored the genetic basis of these traits.

Results

Here, we conduct a genome-wide association study (GWAS) to dissect the genetic basis of geographical differentiation of these traits in 306 worldwide wheat accessions including both landraces and traditional varieties. We determine the changes of haplotypes for the associated genomic regions in frequency in 831 wheat accessions that are either introduced from other countries or developed in China from last two decades. We identify 83 loci that are associated with one trait, while the remaining 247 loci are pleiotropic. We also find 163 associated loci are under strong selective sweep. GWAS results demonstrate independent regulation of internode length of individual stems and consistent regulation of tiller length of individual plants. This makes it possible to obtain ideal haplotype combinations of the length of four internodes. We also find that the geographical distribution of the haplotypes explains the observed differences in internode length among the worldwide wheat accessions.

Conclusion

This study provides insights into the genetic basis of plant architecture. It will facilitate gene functional analysis and molecular design of plant architecture for breeding.

Background

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L) is a widely cultivated crop on over 200 million hectares with an annual production of approximately 700 million metric tons of grain (http://www.fao.org/faostat/). Wheat contributes to nearly 20% of the total dietary calories and protein consumed worldwide [1]. Raising grain yield remains the main target in wheat breeding. Manipulating plant architecture offers an important approach for the improvement of grain yield in crops. Plant architecture encompasses branching (tillering) pattern, plant height, the shape, size, location of leaves, and reproductive organs. Plant architecture is closely associated with the adaptability of a crop to variable environments, assimilate accumulation, and harvest indexing [2]. According to Donald [3], a crop ideotype is a weak competitor and makes a minimum demand on resources per unit of dry matter produced. An ideal plant architecture is of high efficiency relative to its environmental resources. Ideal plant architecture/node length of wheat is different in variable environments (e.g., drought, lodging). Dwarfing and semi-dwarfing alleles of Reduced height (Rht) loci substantially reduce plant height and improve assimilate partitioning to spike and high lodging resistance, all further leading to the improvement of grain yields in wheat [4]. In wheat, plant height is determined by internode number, internode length, and spike length. New internodes are produced until the wheat plants reach the floret initiation stage. After this stage, the increase in stem length mainly reflects internode and spike elongation. Thus, internode initiation rate and internode and spike elongation rate during stem elongation are the major determinants for plant height. The different internodes of an individual stem play variable roles in determining grain yield. Combining the desired phenotype of both apical and basal internodes will be beneficial for increasing grain yield in crops.

Crop domestication and breeding induce natural allelic variations, which determine quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with agricultural traits. Understanding the genetic basis of phenotypic variation in various germplasm is critical for making accurate selection decisions and for combining desired allelic combinations, which will lead to the improvement of wheat grain yield. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) offer a powerful approach for dissecting the genetic basis of complex traits and identifying causal polymorphisms [5, 6]. Although a substantial number of wheat GWAS have been reported, these studies are underpowered owing to the relatively small number of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) used (< 1million). With the availability of the wheat reference genome and next-generation sequencing technologies for resequencing analyses, comparative genomic sequence analyses enable us to identify more than 100 million SNPs [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Haplotype analysis of the associated genomic regions may reveal the selection process of the preferred haplotype during wheat breeding. The identification and utilization of superior alleles for the associated traits may greatly facilitate the breeding of new wheat cultivars with high grain yield. The utilization of preferred haplotypes holds great potential for the improvement of wheat grain yield.

To look for the regulators that separately control the length of each internode, and assess the genetic basis of geographical differentiation and breeding selection for wheat plant architecture traits, we conducted GWAS of eight plant architecture traits in 306 worldwide wheat accessions and determined the associated haplotypes and their geographical distribution. We further examined the breeding effects on these haplotypes in 831 wheat accessions that were introduced from other countries or developed in China from 1900 to 2020. Moreover, we explored a number of loci that can separately control the length of internodes within individual stems.

Results

Overview of plant architecture traits in this study

In this study, we analyzed eight plant architecture traits in two environments based on a large-scale phenotypic screen comprised of 306 worldwide wheat accessions, originating from more than 70 countries (Additional file 2: Table S1). The 306 accessions included 179 landraces and 38 traditional cultivars (Additional file 2: Table S1). To investigate the population differentiation of wheat accessions across the globe, we performed population structure analyses. The PCA result revealed that most varieties from Middle East, Europe, and Asia could be distinguished by the first principal component (PC1), with an overall gradient from the Middle East to both Europe and Asia (Additional file 1: Fig. S1a), which is consistent with the history of wheat dispersal [15, 16]. The neighbor-joining tree suggested that the 306 worldwide accessions could classify into some clades, which were associated with their geographical distribution (Additional file 1: Fig. S1b). For instance, Asian accessions and some accessions from Middle East and Africa grouped into the same clade (Additional file 1: Fig. S1b). Most European accessions clustered into one single clade (Additional file 1: Fig. S1b). The eight traits analyzed were the lengths of each of the shortest tiller length (STL), the longest tiller length (LTL), the main shoot length (ML), the peduncle length (first internode below spike) (PL), the second internode length (SIL), the third internode length (TIL), the fourth internode length (FIL) and the difference in the length between the shortest and the longest tiller length (LSTL) (Fig. 1a).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Phenotypic analyses of wheat accessions for eight plant architecture traits. a Overview of the eight traits in wheat. The shortest and longest tillers were selected from fertile tillers with spikes. The length of the main shoot as the length of the strongest tiller. The difference between the length of the shortest and longest tillers (longest-shortest tiller) was calculated for each plant. b Distribution of phenotypic values and broad sense heritability of the eight plant architecture traits. The broad sense heritability was estimated from the repeatability between raw phenotypes. c Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated using the phenotypic values for the 306 worldwide wheat accessions

All eight traits displayed extensive variation across the 306 wheat accessions (Fig. 1b). These eight traits exhibited close association and obvious differences between the two environments (Additional file 2: Table S2). We assessed broad sense heritability by calculating repeatability between raw phenotypes (Fig. 1b). Most of the traits demonstrated relatively high heritability (0.71–0.88), while the difference in length between the longest and the shortest tiller exhibited a lower heritability (0.27) (Fig. 1b).

The high-resolution dissection of traits related to plant architecture captured several novel relationships (Fig. 1c). For instance, the lengths of the longest tiller, the shortest tiller, and the main shoot were strongly and positively correlated (R ≥ 0.76). This observation suggests the consistency of the longest tiller, the shortest tiller, and the main shoot within individual plants. Peduncle length was strongly and positively associated with the length of the longest tiller (R = 0.79) and the shortest tiller (R = 0.76), but showed a relatively weak correlation with the length of the other three internodes (R = 0.50–0.54). However, the length of the third internode strongly correlated with the length of the fourth internode (R = 0.82). The main shoot is the strongest tiller, which is the same to the longest tiller in some cases. This may partially explain the strong correlation (R = 0.79) between the length of main shoot and longest tiller.

Genome-wide association studies reveal shared and independent genetic determinants of plant architecture traits

In this study, we used genotypic data of wheat accessions from the whole-genome genetic variation map of wheat (VMap [7, 14]). The latest version of VMap (VMap 2.0) [17] consists of 1062 wheat accessions with multiple ploidy levels, from which we selected 306 hexaploid wheat accessions worldwide for this study. The high coverage whole-genome sequencing (~ 10 ×) enabled the identification of 40,710,923 filtered SNPs with minor allele frequency (MAF) > 0.05 across the 306 wheat accessions. Based on these 40,710,923 SNPs, we performed GWAS for the phenotypic values of the eight plant architecture traits in each of the two environments (Y1, 2) and their BLUE values and identified 56,096 (Y1:20,877; Y2:23,315; BLUE:11,904) significant marker–trait associations (− Log10 (P-value) > 5.0) (Fig. 2a, Additional file 2: Table S3). We used linkage disequilibrium (LD) and connections between markers to delineate about 330 significantly associated loci, when at least five nearby SNPs were above the significance threshold, associated with at least one of the eight plant architecture traits (Additional file 2: Table S4). Of the 330 loci, 83 were associated with a single trait, while the remaining 247 showed pleotropic effects on more than one plant architecture traits (Additional file 2: Table S4). Notably, we observed that some significant loci were specially associated with the length of the four internodes, suggesting the relative independence of the genetic control of internode length in this study.

Fig. 2
figure 2

GWAS and network analysis of tiller height across a panel of wheat accessions. a Manhattan plots showing the SNP marker-trait associations for the length of the peduncle, the second internode, the third internode, and the fourth internodes. Orange dots indicate SNPs above the significance threshold (− Log10[P-value] = 5.0). b Association networks across different traits in wheat. The nodes represent plant architecture traits and their associated loci. Longest tiller length, LTL; shortest tiller length, STL; length difference between longest and shortest tiller; longest tiller-shortest tiller length LSTL; main shoot length, MSL; peduncle length, PL; second internode length, SIL; third internode length, TIL; fourth internode length, FIL. The eight traits are indicated by different colors. The edges between the loci from different traits are linked by their LD. Only the edges with an average LD ≥ 0.5 are displayed. The orange solid circles indicate the four loci that are specifically associated with the length of the two internodes. The overlapping loci covering Rht-D1, TaPIN1-6D, Ppd-D1, and TaTB1-4D are indicated by the orange dashed circles. c Distribution of XP-CLR scores (Chinese landraces versus cultivars) for 21 wheat chromosomes. The selected regions and candidate genes detected based on their p ratio are shown. The genome-wide threshold was defined by the top 5% of values

Pleiotropy and LD play important roles in validating phenotypic correlations [18]. Of the 247 loci with pleotropic effects, 182 were associated with more than four traits, and 64 loci had associations with two or three traits (Fig. 2b, Additional file 2: Table S4). These results suggest that these traits might be genetically co-regulated. We took TEOSINTE BRANCHED1 (TB1) as a control, because recent work reported that TB1 regulates height and stem internode length in bread wheat [19]. The genomic region (Chr4D: 15,938,883-19,054,796) including TB1 was associated with the length of second internode, third internode, shortest tiller, longest tiller, and main shoot (Additional file 2: Table S5), suggesting its potential connection with internode length, which is consistent with previous finding [19]. Notably, the major loci for the length of the main shoot (Y1-MSL-1A-1; 2,891 associated SNPs; B-MSL-1A-1:391 associated SNPs), the longest tiller (Y1-LTL-1A-1; 6,079 associated SNPs; B-LTL-1A-1: 27 associated SNPs), the shortest tiller (Y1-STL-1A-1: 1002 associated SNPs; B-STL-1A-1: 5 associated SNPSs), and the peduncle (Y1-PL-1A-1: 5,768 associated SNPs; B-PL-1A-1: 396 associated SNPS; Y2-PL-1A-1: 4 associated SNPs) located in chromosome 1A: 45,791,400-49,172,693 (Additional file 2: Table S4). Most loci for the length of the longest and the shortest tillers overlapped, thus explaining the strong phenotypic correlations between peduncle length and tiller length as well as the consistency of the length among the tillers of individual plants.

To confirm the selected loci in the wheat genome during the gradual improvement of grain yield in China, we selected 59 Chinese wheat accessions (17 cultivars versus 42 landraces) from the 306 wheat accessions for further analysis. These 59 Chinese accessions were selected to display the genomic selection during Chinese wheat breeding process, which will be further used to examine the selection of the associated peaks identified by GWAS. The 59 Chinese accessions are important varieties during Chinese wheat breeding process. We combined the results of whole-genome differentiation of the cross-population composite likelihood ratio (XP-CLR) (Fig. 2c, Additional file 2: Table S6). In total, we determined that 49% of the detected loci (163 of 330) during this study were significantly selected in wheat improvement for higher yield (Fig. 2c, Additional file 2: Table S4). The loci associated with the length of the main shoot, the second internode length, and the longest and shortest tiller in this study (e.g., Y1-MSL-2A-7, Y2-MSL-6B-1, Y2-SIL-2A-1, Y1-SIL-2A-2,, Y2-STL-2A-1, and Y1-LTL-2A-1) as well as known plant height genes (e.g., Rht-D1, and Rht8) appeared to have experienced a strong selective sweep (Additional file 2: Tables S4 and S6). Moreover, the loci that are specifically associated with the length of the peduncle, and the third and fourth internodes (Y1-PL-1A-1 B-PL-1A-1, chr1A:45791400-49094709; Y1-TIL-3D-1, chr3D:35786271-39382820; Y1-FIL-2A-3, chr2A:613558313-619417320) were among the most selected genomic regions (Fig. 2c, Additional file 2: Table S4). Strong selection for these loci reflected the modifications of plant height traits over the past several decades in wheat breeding. In addition, several candidate genes (e.g., TaPIN1-6D, Ppd-D1, SEP1/2-4A, and Rht-D1) associated with spike development, and grain number and size were under strong selection (Additional file 2: Table S6). This result reflected the improvement of adaptation to local environments and grain yield in wheat breeding.

Genetic basis of geographical differentiation and breeding selection of internode length

The internodes within individual stems play different roles in determining grain yield in crops. To search for loci that can separately regulate the length of the four internodes and determine the genomic basis of geographical differentiation and breeding selection for these traits, we examined the distribution of internode length as a function of the geographical provenance of each accession. We then examined the proportion of each haplotype in all geographical regions based on the four major loci specifically associated with the length of each of the four internodes (Fig. 2a, Additional file 2: Table S1) in the 306 worldwide wheat accessions. In addition, we characterized the extent and direction of the changes of haplotype composition in the 831 wheat accessions (most of the 831 Chinese accessions are modern cultivars) that were introduced from other countries or developed in China since 1900 (Additional file 2: Table S7). The genetic control of agronomical traits might be best understood by comparing a progenitor organism with its derivatives. Genetic crosses between progenitor and derivatives would identify the genetic factors that accounted for their different phenotypes. Thus, we examined the haplotype distribution in the wheat accessions in the two pedigrees between the 1920s and 1970s in China.

Peduncle length

Peduncle (the first internode below spike) length showed a distinct distribution pattern across the seven continents/regions (Fig. 3a, Additional file 2: Table S8). European accessions had the longest peduncles (52.88 cm), whereas Asian accessions had the shortest peduncles (46.83 cm) (Fig. 3a, Additional file 2: Table S8). The major locus (Y1-PL-1A-1(5768 associated SNPs); B-PL-1A-1(396 associated SNPs); Y2-PL-1A-1 (four associated SNPs) associated with peduncle length mapped to chromosome 1A:45,791,400-49,094,709. We identified three haplotypes of this locus (peduncle length-long, PL-L; peduncle length-medium, PL-M; peduncle length-short, PL-S) in the 306 worldwide wheat accessions: HapPL−S = 49.27 cm (48.37% of accessions), HapPL−M = 48.83 cm (20.26% of accessions), HapPL−L = 53.84 cm (31.37% of accessions) (Fig. 3b, c, Additional file 2: Tables S9 and S10). European accessions exhibited a higher proportion of HapPL−L, whereas HapPL−S and HapPL−M was more heavily represented in Asian accessions (Fig. 3b, c, Additional file 2: Table S10). In addition, within each of the three haplotypes, the European accessions always had a longer peduncle than African accessions (Additional file 2: Table S10). These results revealed the genetic basis of the differences in peduncle length between geographical areas.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Geographical distribution and breeding selection of the haplotype blocks associated with peduncle length on chromosome 1A. a Peduncle length across wheat accessions originating from the seven continents/regions. Data are means ± standard deviation (SD, n = 5). Significant differences were determined by ANOVA. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). b Phenotypic distribution for peduncle length as a function of the three haplotypes on chromosome 1A. Data are means ± SD (n = 5). Significant differences were determined by Student’s t test (two sided, *P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001). c The percentages of the three haplotypes for each area. Asia means the region excluding the Middle East. d Comparison of XP-CLR score selection signals between Chinese landraces and cultivars for the major locus (Y1-PL-1A-1, chr1A:45,791,400-49,094,709) associated with peduncle length. The red dotted line indicates the threshold (top 5% of scores). e Proportion of accessions harboring the haplotype HapPL−M in four time windows (pre-1960, 1961–1980, 1981–2000, and 2001–2020) in the 831 wheat accessions released between 1900 and 2020 in China. f, h Pedigree relationships and genomic contribution of founder genotypes to new derived cultivars. In each pedigree, three major global genotypes (Rieti, Wilhelmina, and Akagomughi) contribute to derived cultivars including Aimengniu and Xiaoyan6. The basal rows represent the contribution of Aimengniu and Xiaoyan6 to their derivatives. g, i Distribution of haplotype blocks for the locus (Y1-PL-1A-1, chr1A:45791400-49094709) in two wheat pedigrees. Each row is a wheat accession and each column is a haplotype. Alleles that are identical to or different from that in the Chinese Spring genome are indicated by blue and red bars, respectively

The genomic region covering Y1-PL-1A-1 was under clear selection between Chinese landraces and cultivars (Fig. 3d). To further assess the selection of Y1-PL-1A-1 in Chinese wheat accessions over the past 120 years, we determined the proportion of each haplotype in 831 wheat accessions that were introduced from other countries or developed in China since 1900 (Fig. 3e, Additional file 2: Table S7). In the 831 wheat accessions, HapPL−M was the major haplotype (67%, 553 of 831 accessions), whose relative frequency increased from 41% before 1960 to 75% in the time window of 2001–2020. The other two haplotypes, HapPL−S and HapPL−L, were present in the 200 and 15 Chinese wheat accessions, respectively, indicating that the haplotype HapPL−L has not been widely used in China. In agreement with this observation, plants including peduncles have become shorter in China over the past 120 years. The dynamics in haplotypes reflected the genomic scale of breeding selection in China over the past 120 years.

To confirm the changes in frequency for the haplotypes at Y1-PL-1A-1, we used two important pedigrees (Aimengniu, Xiaoyan6) in Chinese wheat breeding. We examined the breeding histories of two important cultivars (Aimengniu, Xiaoyan6) that were initially released in the early 1980s. Aimengniu is a high yield variety, which is the founder genotype for more than 20 released Chinese cultivars, many of which are widely planted in China [9]. Xiaoyan6 was recognized through an award in 1985, and more than 40 Chinese cultivars have been derived from this founder genotype [9]. Our collection included a variety of pedigree contributors and subsequently released derived cultivars for both Aimengniu and Xiaoyan6 founder genotypes (Fig. 3f, h). The genetic contribution of founder genotypes to their derived cultivars was reported in our previous work [9]. We examined the distribution of three haplotypes (HapPL−S, HapPL−M, and HapPL−L) in the two pedigrees of two founder genotypes (Aimengniu, Xiaoyan6) (Fig. 3f, h). Both pedigrees were ultimately derived from three major global genotypes (Rieti, Wilhelmina, and Akagomughi) between the 1920s and 1970s [9]. In the first pedigree (Aimengniu), three founder genotypes (Rieti, Wilhelmina, and Akagomughi) contributed to derived cultivars: Mentana, Autonomia, Abbondanza, Mengxian 201, Aimengniu. More recently, Zhoumai 9, Zhoumai 16, Xumai 35, Zhoumai 18, and Zhongmai 66 derived from Aimengniu (Fig. 3f). In addition, some other varieties (e.g., Fontarronco, Yuejin5, Neuzucht, Aifeng5, Bainong791, Yanshi4, Zhou8425B) contributed to derived cultivars in the first pedigree. In the second pedigree (Xiaoyan6), Villa Glori, San Pastore, St 2422/464, and Xiaoyan6 were the derivatives of the same founder genotypes (Rieti, Wilhelmina, and Akagomughi). Next, Xinong 881, Zhengmai 9023, Zhengmai 366, Xinong 979, and Fengdecunmai 5 derived from Xiaoyan6 (Fig. 3h). Moreover, some other varieties (e.g. Mara, Xiaoyan96, Xinong65, Yumai47, Shaan 213, Zhengmai16) contributed to derived cultivars in the second pedigree (Xiaoyan6). All the SNP information of the varieties in the two pedigrees can be obtained from our previous work [9].

The haplotype distribution in the wheat accessions in the pedigrees allowed us to identify the haplotypes that matched the modification of wheat breeding (Fig. 3g, i, Additional file 2: Tables S11 and S12). In the two pedigrees, for the three original founder genotypes, Rieti, Wilhelmina, and Mara harbored HapPL−L, while Akagomughi carried the HapPL−S (Fig. 3g, i). The remaining derived cultivars had HapPL−S, except Mengxian 201 (first pedigree), Neuzucht (first pedigree), Aimengniu (first pedigree), Yanshi4 (first pedigree), Yumai47 (second pedigree), Zhengmai366 (second pedigree), and Fengdecunmai5 (second pedigree) with HapPL−M (Fig. 3g, i, Additional file 2: Tables S11 and S12). The different haplotypes of these four derivatives with the three original founder genotypes also indicated the contribution of other founder genotypes. This finding was consistent with reduced plant height in wheat breeding. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that HapFIL−S was likely introduced from other founders which does not belong to these two pedigrees.

Length of the second internode

Oceanian accessions exhibited the longest second internode of all groups (30.11 cm), whereas African accessions had the shortest second internode (26.71 cm) (Additional file 2: Table S8, Additional file 1: Fig. S2a). The major locus (Y1-SIL-1A-2) associated with the length of second internode located to chromosome 1A:555,809,177-557,861,830. We detected two haplotypes at this locus (second internode length-long, SIL-L; second internode length-short, SIL-S) in the 306 worldwide wheat accessions: HapSIL−L = 28.61 cm (94.44% of accessions), HapSIL−S = 22.93 cm (4.90% of accessions) (Additional file 2: Tables S9 and S10; Additional file 1: Fig. S2b, c). All Oceanian accessions harbored only HapSIL−L, whereas African accessions presented both HapSIL−L (89.66%) and HapSIL−S (10.34%) (Additional file 2: Table S10; Additional file 1: Fig. S2b, c). The distinct distribution of the two haplotypes supported the genomic basis of the phenotypic differences between Oceania and Africa.

The locus Y1-SIL-1A-2 was not a target of selection between Chinese landraces and cultivars (Additional file 2: Table S4; Additional file 1: Fig. S2d). Indeed, we only detected one haplotype (HapSIL−L) across the 831 wheat accessions, making HapSIL−S absent from Chinese wheat accessions (Additional file 1: Fig. S2e). We examined the haplotype distribution in the two pedigrees, as shown in Fig. 3e, g (Additional file 2: Tables S11 and S12; Additional file 1: Fig. S2f, g). For the three original founder genotypes, Rieti and Wilhelmina carried HapSIL−L, and Akagomughi harbored the HapSIL−S. Importantly, no derivatives in either pedigrees retained HapSIL−S, except Yuejin5 (first pedigree) and Zhou8425B (first pedigree), indicating that HapSIL−S was selected against these derivatives (Additional file 2: Tables S11 and S12; Additional file 1: Fig. S2f, g), in agreement with its absence in the 831 wheat accessions.

Length of the third internode

Middle Eastern accessions had the longest third internode (23.08 cm), whereas Oceanian accessions exhibited the shortest third internode (19.69 cm) (Additional file 2: Table S8; Additional file 1: Fig. S3a). The major locus (Y1-TIL-3D-1) associated with third internode length mapped to chromosome 3D:35,786,271-39,382,820. We identified two haplotypes at this locus (third internode length-long, TIL-L; third internode length-short, TIL-S) in the 306 worldwide wheat accessions: HapTIL−S = 21.57 cm (94.10% of accessions), HapTIL−L = 21.87 cm (5.90% of accessions) (Additional file 2: Tables S9 and S10; Additional file 1: Fig. S3b, c). Although we did not observed significant difference of the BLUE values of data in 2021 and 2022, the phenotypic values for these two haplotypes were obviously different for each year (Additional file 2: Table S13). Middle Eastern accessions had the (88.10% of accessions) and HapTIL−L (11.90% of accessions) HapTIL−S haplotype, whereas African accessions presented both HapTIL−S (93.10% of accessions) and HapTIL−L (6.90% of accessions) (Additional file 2: Table S10, Additional file 1: Fig. S3b, c). The differences of the distribution of the two haplotypes indicated the genomic basis of the phenotypic differences between Africa and the Middle East.

We determined that Y1-TIL-3D-1 was selected between Chinese landraces and cultivars (Additional file 2: Table S4, Additional file 1: Fig. S3d). Indeed, the frequency distribution of Y1-TIL-3D-1 haplotypes changed over time. While HapTIL−S was the major haplotype in the 831 wheat accessions, its frequency increased from 90% before 1960 phase to 96% after 2000 (Additional file 2: Table S7; Additional file 1: Fig. S3e). In the two pedigrees, all the wheat accessions had HapTIL−S (Additional file 2: Tables S11 and S12; Additional file 1: Fig. S3f, g).

Length of the fourth internode

Middle Eastern accessions had the longest fourth internode (18.23 cm), whereas African accessions had the shortest fourth internode (14.52 cm) (Additional file 2: Table S8; Additional file 1: Fig. S4a). The major locus (Y1-FIL-2A-3; B-FIL-2A-1) associated with fourth internode length located to chromosome 2A:613,558,313–619,417,320. We detected two haplotypes at this locus (fourth internode length-long, FIL-L; fourth internode length-short, FIL-S) in the 306 worldwide wheat accessions: HapFIL−L = 17.54 cm (90.82%), HapFIL−S = 11.69 cm (9.18%) (Additional file 2: Tables S9 and S10; Additional file 1: Fig. S4b, c). All Middle Eastern accessions harbored HapTIL−S, whereas African accessions included both HapFIL−S (6.90%) and HapFIL−L (93.10%) (Additional file 2: Table S10; Additional file 1: Fig. S4b, c), the distribution differences of the two haplotypes indicated the genomic basis of the phenotypic differences between Africa and the Middle East.

Y1-FIL-2A-3 and B-FIL-2A-1 were clearly selected between Chinese landraces and cultivars (Additional file 2: Table S4; Additional file 1: Fig. S4d). The two haplotypes at Y1-FIL-2A-3 displayed changes in their frequencies across breeding periods. In the 831 wheat accessions, HapFIL−L was the major haplotype in 72% of accessions released prior to 1960, this percentage decreased from 72% before 1960 to 37% after 2000 (Additional file 2: Table S7; Additional file 1: Fig. S4e). In the two pedigrees, all the three founder genotypes (Rieti, Wilhelmina, and Akagomughi) harbored HapFIL−L. In the first pedigree (Aimengniu), most derived cultivars carried HapFIL−S, four derived cultivars (i.e. Neuzucht, Yumai2, Zhou8425B, Yanshi4) had HapFIL−L (Additional file 2: Table S11; Additional file 1: Fig. S4f). In the second pedigree (Xiaoyan6), Xiaoyan6, PH62-2–2, Zhoumai16, Xinong65, Shaan 213, Zhoumai9023, and Xinong979 had HapFIL−S (Additional file 2: Table S12; Additional file 1: Fig. S4g). These results suggest that HapFIL−S was introduced from other founder genotypes, rather than the three founder genotypes (Rieti, Wilhelmina, and Akagomughi).

To evaluate the evolutionary relationship of the haplotypes for loci of the length of the four internodes, in addition to the 306 hexaploid wheat accessions, we used 126 additional accessions including 30 Aegilops tauschii, 96 tetraploid wheat varieties, which have been sequenced previously [7]. We extracted SNPs that are in high linkage disequilibrium in a haplotype and used popArt [20] to visualize the network (Fig. 4a; Additional file 2: Table S15; Additional file 1: Fig. S5).

Fig. 4
figure 4

The evolutionary relationship of the haplotypes for Peduncle length (PL) locus (chromosome 1A:45,791,400-49,094,709). a Haplotype networks for PL locus. The haplotype networks were developed based on the SNPs in high linkage disequilibrium in a haplotype using the 306 hexaploid wheat accessions, and 126 additional accessions (30 Aegilops tauschii, 96 tetraploid wheat varieties). b Introgression from donor populations across PL locus (1A:45,791,400-49,094,709). Mean of fd was calculated on PL locus using Indian Dwarf Wheat as P1, Mengxian201 as P2, Rye as outgroup in four-taxon topology ((P1, P2), P3, O). c Haplotype blocks on PL locus with candidate introgression donors of Mengxian201. d The window based fd value on PL locus when B016 is used as P3, the window is set with 100 SNPs, with stepsize of 5 SNPs calculated using the python script available at https://github.com/simonhmartin/genomics_general

The haplotypes of loci for peduncle length (PL) locus (1A:45,791,400-49,094,709), second internode length (SIL, 1A:555,809,177-557,861,830), and fourth internode length (FIL, 2A:613,558,313-619,417,320) appeared to derive from wild emmer (Additional file 1: Fig. S5). In addition, the introgression of these haplotypes from domesticated emmer and free-threshing tetraploids may partly contribute to their appearance in hexaploid wheat (Additional file 1: Fig. S5). This evolution process of these haplotypes for these two loci is consistent with the evolutionary history of hexaploid wheat (Additional file 1: Fig. S5). The haplotypes of locus for third internode length (TIL, 3D:35,786,271-39,382,820) may be infiltrated from Anathera, Meyeri, and Strangulata (Additional file 1: Fig. S5c). Consistently, our previous work indicated that Strangulata is the donor of D genome [7].

The haplotype of PL locus (1A:45,791,400-49,094,709) in Mengxian201 was unclear in the first pedigree (Fig. 3g). We therefore examined the potential genetic donor of haplotypes for Mengxian201. The potential donors are four free-threshing tetraploids and one domesticated emmer indicated by fd > 0.9 (Fig. 4b). To further seek the donor of Mengxian201, we analyzed the haplotype blocks on this locus with its possible donors, one free-threshing tetraploid B016 turns out to be the most possible donor of Mengxian201, because it has the most similar haplotype blocks with Mengxian201 among all five candidates and fd values are nearly equal to 1 across the locus (Fig. 4c, d). Furthermore, the minimum IBS distance also support this hypothesis, the value of IBS distance between Mengxian201 and B016 is even smaller than that with the hexaploid landrace Aifeng3 (Fig. 4c). Our work indicated that free-threshing tetraploids B016 is the most possible donor of Mengxian201; however, it might not be the direct donor, since we cannot exclude the other possibilities during wheat breeding, such as natural outcrossing, heterozygous parent.

We observed obvious differences of the phenotypic values between the two environments for the length of four internodes (Additional file 2: Table S2). Notably, the genotypic values for the length of the first and second internodes were higher in 2021 than those in 2022. However, the genotypic values for the length of the third and fourth internodes were higher in 2022 than those in 2021. The Shukla model [21] was used to evaluate the interaction between genotypes and environments (Additional file 2: Table S14). Obvious interactions between haplotypes and environments for four haplotypes (HapPL−S, HapSIL−L, HapSIL−S, HapTIL−L) were observed in this study (Additional file 2: Table S14). In addition, the results suggested the relative stability of other haplotypes of the length of four internodes (Additional file 2: Table S14).

Genomic basis of geographical differentiation of tiller length

We identified a locus on chromosome 1A between 45,791,400 and 49,172,693 bp that was associated with the length of the longest tiller, the shortest tiller, and the main shoot. This locus mapped to the same position as the major locus of the first internode length mentioned above (Additional file 2: Table S4). We observed the highest values for the longest tiller, shortest tiller, and the main shoot in European wheat accessions and the shortest values in African wheat accessions, which was the same trend as that seen for the length of the first internode (Additional file 2: Table S8). Similarly, the three haplotypes associated with the locus for first internode length displayed identical effects on the length of the longest tiller, shortest tiller, and the main shoot (Additional file 2: Table S10), suggesting that this observed haplotype distribution might explain the geographical distribution of these phenotypes.

Geographical differentiation and breeding selection of haplotype combinations for the length of the internodes

Wheat breeding has exploited variable haplotypes associated with agricultural traits. Understanding the genetic basis of this phenotypic variation in various germplasms is critical for making accurate selection decisions and for combining desired haplotype combinations to improve wheat grain yield. We detected seven major haplotype combinations of the four major loci for the length of the four internodes. These seven combinations accounted for 94.12% (288 accessions) of all the haplotypes in the 306 worldwide wheat accessions (Additional file 2: Table S16). We determined the effects of the seven combinations on the associated traits (Fig. 5a–d, Additional file 2: Table S17). The four internodes were shorter in haplotype combination 4 (C4, HapPL−S-HapSIL−S- HapTIL−S-HapFIL−S) and C7 (HapPL−S-HapSIL−L-HapTIL−S-HapFIL−S) than the other five haplotype combinations (C1, C2, C3, C5, C6), although these five combinations harbored one or two haplotypes that negatively regulate the length of internodes (Fig. 5a–d, Additional file 2: Table S17). This indicated that the haplotypes of negative effects on the length of internodes are synergistic in these seven combinations. Consistently, C4 and C7 exhibited shorter stems compared to the other five combinations (Fig. 5e, Additional file 2: Table S17). As expected, the peduncle length had a higher proportion in the stem length relative to the length of second, third, and fourth internodes (Fig. 5f, Additional file 2: Table S17). More accessions harbored C2 and C6 than other combinations in most areas (Fig. 5g, Additional file 2: Table S17). However, C3 was more widely distributed in Asia (except the Middle East) relative to other areas (Fig. 5g).

Fig. 5
figure 5

The geographical distribution, breeding selection, and effects of haplotype combinations on associated traits. ae The differences of the length of the peduncle (a), the second internode (b), the third internode (c), the fourth internode (d), and the stem (e) among the seven haplotype combinations. Data are shown as means ± SD (n = 5). Significant differences were determined by ANOVA. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). f The percentages of the length of the peduncle (PL), the second internode (SIL), the third internode (TIL), and the fourth internode (FIL) relative to stem length. g Geographical distribution of the seven haplotype combinations for each area. hj Frequency of three haplotype combinations among 831 Chinese wheat accessions released from 1900 to 2020. HapFIL−N1 was a new haplotype in 831 Chinese wheat accessions, which was not observed in 306 worldwide wheat accessions

We further explored the history of haplotype combinations of the four major loci for the length of the four internodes in 831 Chinese wheat accessions released between 1900 and 2020 (Fig. 5h–j, Additional file 2: Table S18). In the 831 Chinese wheat accessions, we identified 32 haplotype combinations, but did not detect C1 and C4 from the 306 worldwide wheat accessions. Of the 32 combinations, three combinations had been obviously selected in Chinese wheat breeding. C6 of the 306 worldwide wheat accessions was also observed in 831 Chinese wheat accessions. C6 decreased in frequency from 26.05% of all accessions before 1960 to 13.33% (1961–1980), 7.22% (1981–2000), and 3.98% (2001–2020) (Fig. 5h, Additional file 2: Table S18). The haplotype combination (HapPL−M-HapSIL−L-HapTIL−S-HapFIL−N1) increased obviously in frequency from pre-1961 to 1961–1980 among Chinese wheat accessions, suggesting that this combination was selected during this time window (Fig. 5i, Additional file 2: Table S18). Similarly, another haplotype combination (HapPL−S-HapSIL−L-HapTIL−S-HapFIL−N1) in frequency increased from 0.84% of all accessions before 1960 to 2.22% (1961–1980), 7.73% (1981–2000), and 10.30% (2001–2020) (Fig. 5j, Additional file 2: Table S18).

Discussion

Plant breeders have paid special attention to plant architecture for decades because of its significance for improving varieties. Plant architecture plays a decisive role in grain yield potential. Plants with reduced height benefit from improved lodging resistance and assimilates partitioning to the developing spike, facilitating improved floret fertility and grain numbers per spike [22].

Some QTLs and genes associated with internode length have been identified in different species, which provided genetic resources for the manipulation of plant height through the length of different internodes [23,24,25,26,27,28]. To the best of our knowledge, in wheat, some genetic work related to peduncle have been reported [29, 30]. However, few genetic studies dissected the length of internodes or the length of the shortest and longest tillers within individual plants. The only publication reported the QTLs of the internode length using two biparental populations without the physical positions in wheat genome, since the information of reference genome was not available at that time [31]. Some identified loci in this study were overlapped with reported QTLs or genes in previous work. Nevertheless, a big proportion of the identified loci, especially these loci associated with four internodes, are novel relative to previous studies.

In this study, we determined the phenotypic variation for eight plant architecture traits, including the length of the four internodes and the shortest and the longest tiller, based on 306 worldwide wheat accessions originating from the seven continents/regions. We used whole-genome sequencing data for these 306 wheat accessions, with an average depth of 10 × coverage and identified about 40 million high-confidence and high-quality SNPs. GWAS results identified QTLs that are independent of the known Rht genes, therefore providing new resources for the genetic control of plant height and internode length.

Few studies have explored the genetic basis of the geographical distribution and breeding selection of the internode length. In this study, the worldwide distribution of the haplotypes underlying each of the identified QTLs offers a glimpse into the genomic basis behind the phenotypic differences for the eight traits measured here as a function of geographical origin. In addition, we examined the selection of all haplotypes during wheat over the past 120 years in China. These haplotypes have been clearly selected (for or against) in Chinese breeding, indicating that the observed alterations of haplotypes underscore the genomic basis of modification for plant architecture traits in the past 120 years in China.

The peduncle, the first internode below the spike, plays variable roles in the determination of crop grain yield. The peduncle vascular system is critical for the transport of photosynthetic products, nutrients, and water from the roots and leaves to the filling grain [32, 33]. We identified one major locus related to the length of peduncle and main shoot. Within this major locus, four SNPs were significantly (− Log10[P-value] > 5.0) associated with the traits and located in the gene TraesCS1A02G064800. Therefore, we identified TraesCS1A02G064800 as a candidate gene that controlled peduncle length. The orthologue of TraesCS1A02G064800 in Arabidopsis is Trehalose-6-P synthase 1. We identified four major haplotypes at TraesCS1A02G064800 in the 306 worldwide wheat accessions (Fig. 6c, Additional file 2: Table S19). These four haplotypes comprised 59, 93, 88, and 53 accessions, respectively (Additional file 2: Table S19). We determined the effects of the four haplotypes on the associated traits (Fig. 6d, e, Additional file 2: Table S16). There were significant differences in the length of the peduncle (main shoot) and the main shoot between these four haplotypes (Fig. 6d, e, Additional file 2: Table S16). Therefore, we identified TraesCS1A02G064800 as a candidate gene that controlled the length of peduncle and main shoot.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Contributions of TraesCS1A02G064800 alleles to the length of the peduncle and the main shoot in RILs. a The associated signals on chromosome 1A. Red dots indicate the SNPs of the marker-trait associations above the significance threshold (− Log10[P-value] = 5.0). b Pairwise LD analysis. Local Manhattan plot (top) and LD heat map (bottom) surrounding the peak on chromosome 1A. Red color highlights the strong LD with the significant variants. Arrows indicate the four SNPs that were significantly (− Log10[P-value] > 5.0) associated with the traits and located in the exonic region of this gene TraesCS1A02G064800. c Gene structure and the haplotypes of TraesCS1A02G064800. Green rectangles and black lines indicate exons and introns, respectively. The gene is located on the reverse strand. The haplotypes were determined based on 306 worldwide wheat accessions. The SNPs of the haplotypes were indicated in c. d, e The differences of the length of the peduncle (d) and the main shoot (e) and among the four haplotypes (n = 59 accessions (Hap1), 93 accessions (Hap2), 88 accessions (Hap3), 53 accessions (Hap4) of TraesCS1A02G064800. Data are means ± SD (n = 5). Significant differences were determined by ANOVA. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). f, g Contrast between original Zhongmai175 alleles (AA, long plants, RILlong) and Yanzhan4110 alleles (GG, short plants, RILshort) with respect to the length of the peduncle (f) and the main shoot (g). Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 5). Significant differences were determined by Student’s t test (two sided)

To compare the contributions of TraesCS1A02G064800 alleles to the length of peduncle and the main shoot and evaluate its potential value in wheat breeding, we assessed the phenotypic differences of these two traits between the alleles in a genetic population. Sequencing the coding sequence (CDS) of TraesCS1A02G064800 resulted in the identification of a nonsynonymous A/G SNP (4,245 bp into the gene, 1,046 bp in the coding sequence) between the cultivars Zhongmai175 (AA, average main shoot length of 71.50 cm, average peduncle length of 43.00 cm) and Yanzhan4110 (GG, average main shoot length of 58.50 cm, average peduncle length of 30.50 cm). The nonsynonymous SNP caused a change from aspartate (Zhongmai175) to glutamate (Yanzhan4110). Asian accessions exhibited a higher proportion of the allele with longer main shoot and peduncle (AA, 72.06%), whereas the allele with shorter main shoot and peduncle was more heavily represented in Oceania (GG, 70.59%) (Additional file 2: Table S20). These two alleles were present almost equally in the remaining five areas (Additional file 2: Table S20).

We examined recombinant inbred lines (RILs) generated from the parents Zhongmai175 (AA, RILslong) and Yanzhan4110 (GG, RILsshort). On average, the RILslong (average plant height 70.46 cm, average peduncle length 26.22 cm) had taller plants than the RILsshort (average plant height 66.79 cm, average peduncle length 24.84 cm) (Fig. 5g, Additional file 2: Table S21). These results suggested the potential of TraesCS1A02G064800 alleles in the modification of plant height by regulating peduncle length (Fig. 6f, g).

Lodging is a serious concern that leads to lower grain yield in most cereal crops. The length of basal internodes is closely connected to lodging resistance. Shortened Basal Internodes (SBI) encodes a gibberellin 2-oxidase and specifically controls the elongation of basal internodes in rice [34]. Similarly, in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), a gene controlling internode elongation was mapped to GA2oxidase 7, a class III GA 2-oxidase in the gibberellin biosynthetic pathway [35]. We identified loci associated with the length of basal internodes (the third and fourth internodes) that specifically control the length of basal internodes and not that of other internodes or shoot length. These loci offer the new resources for the improvement of lodging resistance in wheat. The haplotype distribution across different areas worldwide and in various time windows in the past 120 years is consistent with the phenotypic differences, which provides the genomic basis of geographical differentiation and breeding selection for wheat plant architecture traits. Independent control of internode length of individual stems enabled us to get desired haplotype combinations of the length of four internodes with different functions.

The spike number per unit area is one of the key factors that determine grain yield in wheat [36, 37]. The difference in the length between the shortest and the longest tiller reveals the space that can accommodate spikes [38,39,40]. In this study, we identified 30 loci related to this difference, of which 15 loci (Additional file 2: Table S4) only connected to this trait, suggesting the potential for these loci to manipulate the number of spikes.

Conclusions

In summary, our work explored the genomic basis of geographical differentiation and breeding selection for wheat plant architecture traits. We revealed the genetic association networks across different traits as well as the loci specifically controlling individual traits. This information will be helpful for the improvement of cultivars during wheat breeding.

Methods

Planting and phenotyping

Seeds for 306 worldwide wheat accessions were sown with two replicates to ensure data repeatability in Zhaoxian, Hebei province, China (37° 27′ N, 113° 30′ E, altitude 78 m) in 2020–2021 and 2021–2022. For each replicate, six rows were planted per accession, with each row (1.5 m in length) including 15 plants, with 10 cm between rows. For the sowing, we used a self-made hole punch to ensure the consistency of plant spacing and sowing depth. The punch is welded on a 1-m-long steel plate, on which steel columns with equal spacing are evenly distributed. These steel columns are thick at the top and thin at the bottom and have equal length, which allowed us to ensure that the hole depth is consistent.

The phenotypic data of the eight traits exhibited differences and similarity between the two locations, and closely correlated with each other (Additional file 2: Table S11). All field management tasks (e.g., irrigation, weed management, and fertilization) were performed according to the normal standards. Plants were irrigated when required. Seven traits were measured at physiological maturity, and the resulting values were used to calculate one trait (the difference between the length of the shortest and longest tiller). Five plants were randomly selected as five replicates for each accession to determine the eight traits at each location. The eight traits include the length of the first (peduncle), second, third, and fourth internode from top; the length of the shortest main shoot and the longest main shoot; and the difference between the length of the shortest and the longest tiller. The main shoot was selected as the strongest tiller for each plant. The longest and shortest tillers were determined by the length of fertile tillers with spikes for individual plants. The first, second, third, and fourth internodes were measured along the main shoot from the top of plants.

Statistical analysis of plant architecture traits

To obtain best linear unbiased predictor (BLUE) values, the values of eight plant architecture traits in all environments were calculated using the lem4 package in R [41]. The formula was as follows:

$$Y=\mathrm\mu+\mathrm{Line}+\mathrm{Env}+(\mathrm{Line}\times\mathrm{Env})+(\mathrm{Env}\times\mathrm{Rep})+\mathrm{error}$$

where μ is the mean, Line is the genotype effect, Env is the environment, Line × Env is the genotype and environment interaction, Env × Rep is the environment and replication interaction, and error is the error of the environment and the replication.

Genotype calling and SNP identification

SNP discovery and genotyping were performed through a well-established pipeline used for the construction of version 2.0 of the whole-genome genetic variation map of wheat (VMap 2.0) [17]. A total of 306 hexaploid wheat accessions were selected from VMap 2.0 for this study. A total of 40,710,923 segregating SNPs (minimum allele frequency [MAF] > 0.05; missing rate < 20%; missing genotype rate < 10%) were used for GWAS. For the 831 Chinese accessions, we genotyped all the accessions with wheat 660 K SNP array [42]. Genotype imputation is a process of estimating missing genotypes from the reference panel and is commonly performed in GWAS to increase the number of useful markers [43,44,45]. The SNPs for 831 wheat accessions were obtained by genotype imputation based on the SNPs of 306 worldwide wheat accessions. Genotype imputation was conducted based on the source data according to previous work [43,44,45]. Out of 831 wheat accessions, 86 were previously resequenced with an average read depth of 17.9 × for each accession [9]. The genome sequence of these 86 wheat accessions was used to check and correct the genotype imputations for the 831 wheat accessions. The source data for the SNPs of the 86 wheat accessions were downloaded from the wheat Union database [46].

Genome wide association study (GWAS)

The GWAS was performed for eight plant architecture traits on 306 worldwide wheat accessions using 40,710,923 SNPs (MAF > 0.05; missing rate < 20%; missing genotype rate < 10%). The algorithm efficient mixed model association expedited (EMMAX) can efficiently correct for a wide range of population structures, which would otherwise lead to spurious genotype–phenotype associations in a GWAS [47]. Therefore, the GWAS was conducted using GEMMA (version 0.98.4) by fitting the mixed linear model (MLM) association expedited (EMMAX) algorithm, including kinship as a correlation matrix.

The top three principal components (PCs) from principal component analysis (PCA) were used to build the matrix for population structure correction using Plink [48] with the parameters in the program set to “–pca 10”. The matrix of simple matching coefficients was used to build the kinship (K) matrix. Genetic relationship between accessions was modeled as a random effect using the K matrix. We used significant P-value thresholds (P < 10–5) to control genome-wide type I errors according to previous study that included identical SNP number in wheat [9].

Linkage disequilibrium analysis

To determine the genomic regions of interest, the SNPs associated with all traits above a significance threshold of −Log10(P-value) = 5 were combined and the duplicates removed with vcftools. LD between SNPs was calculated by PLINK [48], with the parameters in the program set to “ --allow-no-sex --maf 0.05 --geno 0.2 --r2 --ld-window 50000 --ld-window-r2 0.” The results were used to combine SNPs to define intervals based on the LD between markers, with markers with r2 > 0.1 being included in the same interval. If the distance between the peak SNPs of two adjacent loci was less than 5 Mb, these two loci were merged. The number of significant SNPs contained within each genomic region was counted. If the SNP number in the corresponding genomic region was more than 5, the region was defined as a QTL. The software LDBlockShow was used to conduct the pairwise LD analysis of the associated genomic region for TraesCS1A02G064800 [49].

Construction of association networks

The analysis of association network was conducted using the software Cytoscape [50] (Version: 3.2.1). The network displayed the connections between the traits and their corresponding loci as well as the links between loci (average r2 ≥ 0.5). The effective scores for each locus are represented by P-values of the most significant SNPs associated with the corresponding traits in the GWAS. The link between pairs of loci was represented as their average LD. Here, the LD was calculated according to previous work [6] as follows:

$$\mathrm{LD}=1/2\ast(\mathrm{LD}\,(\mathrm{locus}1,\,\mathrm{locus}2)/\mathrm{PmaxLD}(\mathrm{locus}1)+\mathrm{LD}(\mathrm{locusn}1,\,\mathrm{locus}2)/\mathrm{PmaxLD}(\mathrm{locus}2))$$

with LD (locus1, locus2) being the average pairwise LD value (r2) between all SNPs of locus1 and all SNPs of locus2; PmaxLD(locus1)/PmaxLD(locus2) is the largest possible LD value within the locus1/locus2 locus, obtained by calculating the average r2 of each SNP against all SNPs from the locus1/locus2 locus. The maximum average LD value represents this locus’s PmaxLD. Pairwise r2 values were calculated between all significant SNPs using PLINK [48].

SNP-based haplotype construction for loci

The SNP-based haplotype construction for each locus was evaluated using the LDheatmap and Pheatmap software package in R. The Pheatmap package defines haplotype blocks and provides the number of haplotypes and their physical length (bp) for each block, as well as the number of tagged SNPs. If the SNP was the same as in the reference type (Chinese Spring), it was given a value of 0; if the SNP was different from that of Chinese Spring, it was given a value of 1. Heterozygous and missing SNP were given a value of 0.5. Full cluster analysis was performed on all accessions using Euclidean distance using Pheatmap (version1.0.12) in R. The LDheatmap package in R [51] was used to conduct LD analysis for each locus in this study.

Identification of putative selective sweeps

The XP-CLR test [52] was used to detect selective sweeps to identify potential selective signals between Chinese cultivars (17 accessions) and landraces (42 accessions, reference population) in 306 word wheat accessions. The XP-CLR score between two wheat populations was calculated using the parameters “--ld 0.95 --maxsnps 1000 --size 50000 --step 20000.” To detect which gene was under selection, the selection sweeps were ranked based on decreasing XP-CLR scores, and the top 5% regions were chosen as selective sweeps.

The interaction between genotypes and environments, and the stability of haplotypes

The Shukla model [21] was used to evaluate the interaction between genotypes and environments. The interaction evaluated using the formula as follows:

$${\mathrm{ge}}_{\mathrm{ij}}={\mathrm y}_{\mathrm{ij}}-{\mathrm g}_{\mathrm i}-{\mathrm e}_{\mathrm j}-\mathrm\mu$$

where geij is the interaction between genotypes and environemts, yij is the phenotypic values of genotype i in environment j, gi is the effects of genotype i, ej is the effects of environment j, and μ is the mean of the corresponding traits for all the genotypes in all the environments.

The f d statistic analysis

The fd statistic can estimate the proportion of introgression in a given window [53]. We estimated the fd values across the genome using the python code available at https://github.com/simonhmartin/genomics_general. The sliding window was set with a window size of 100 SNPs and a step size of 5 SNPs. We converted the fd statistic value to 0 for windows of D < 0 because the negative fd statistic value is meaningless. We estimated the fd statistic value using Indian dwarf wheat as P1, Mengxian201 as P2, rye as outgroup in four-taxon topology ((P1, P2), P3, O), the P3 are diploid and tetraploid relatives of bread wheat, including 28 urartu, 31 wild einkorn, 31 domesticated einkorn, 26 wild emmer, 29 domesticated emmer, 41 free-threshing tetraploids.

Availability of data and materials

The genotypes of 306 wheat accession used in this study have been deposited in the Genome Variation Map (https://bigd.big.ac.cn/gvm) under accession number GVM000463 [14, 54]. The sequence data of the 86 wheat accession used in this study were downloaded from the WheatUnion database (http://wheat.cau.edu.cn/WheatUnion/c_5/). The detailed information of all significantly associated SNP genotype data in Additional file 2: Table S3 belong to 306 wheat accession genotype, which can be obtained from GVM00463. The genotypic data of all the varieties in the first pedigree (Aimengniu and xiaoyan6) for Additional file 2: Tables S11 and S12 was downloaded from the WheatUnion database (http://wheat.cau.edu.cn/WheatUnion/c_5/). The raw phenotypic data for Additional file 2: Tables S8-S10 and S19 can be obtained from Additional file 2: Table S1. The raw phenotypic data for RIL can be obtained from the Additional file 2: Table S21. The genes in Additional file 2: Tables S5 [19, 55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78] and S6 [19, 56, 79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97] in the study were reported previously.

References

  1. Reynolds M, Foulkes J, Furbank R, Griffiths S, King J, Murchie E, Parry M, Slafer G. Achieving yield gains in wheat. Plant Cell Environ. 2012;35:1799–823.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Khush GS. Green revolution: the way forward. Nat Rev Genet. 2001;2:815–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Donald CM. Breeding of crop ideotypes. Euphytica. 1968;17:385–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gale MD, Youssefian S. Dwarfing genes in wheat. In: Progress in plant breeding–1. 1985.

  5. Guo ZF, Chen DJ, Alqudah AM, Roder MS, Ganal MW, Schnurbusch T. Genome-wide association analyses of 54 traits identified multiple loci for the determination of floret fertility in wheat. New Phytol. 2017;214:257–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fang C, Ma YM, Wu SW, Liu Z, Wang Z, Yang R, Hu GH, Zhou ZK, Yu H, Zhang M, et al. Genome-wide association studies dissect the genetic networks underlying agronomical traits in soybean. Genome Biol. 2017;18:161–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou Y, Zhao XB, Li YW, Xu J, Bi AY, Kang LP, Xu DX, Chen HF, Wang Y, Wang YG, et al. Triticum population sequencing provides insights into wheat adaptation. Nat Genet. 2020;52:1412–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Appels R, Eversole K, Feuillet C, Keller B, Rogers J, Stein N, Pozniak CJ, Choulet F, Distelfeld A, Poland J, et al. Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome. Science. 2018;361:661–73.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hao CY, Jiao CZ, Hou J, Li T, Liu HX, Wang YQ, Zheng J, Liu H, Bi ZH, Xu FF, et al. Resequencing of 145 landmark cultivars reveals asymmetric sub-genome selection and strong founder genotype effects on wheat breeding in China. Mol Plant. 2020;13:1733–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo W, Xin M, Wang Z, Yao Y, Hu Z, Song W, Yu K, Chen Y, Wang X, Guan P, et al. Origin and adaptation to high altitude of Tibetan semi-wild wheat. Nat Commun. 2020;11:5085–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Maccaferri M, Harris NS, Twardziok SO, Pasam RK, Gundlach H, Spannagl M, Ormanbekova D, Lux T, Prade VM, Milner SG, et al. Durum wheat genome highlights past domestication signatures and future improvement targets. Nat Genet. 2019;51:885–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Walkowiak S, Gao L, Monat C, Haberer G, Kassa MT, Brinton J, Ramirez-Gonzalez RH, Kolodziej MC, Delorean E, Thambugala D, et al. Multiple wheat genomes reveal global variation in modern breeding. Nature. 2020;588:277–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gaurav K, Arora S, Silva P, Sanchez-Martin J, Horsnell R, Gao LL, Brar GS, Widrig V, Raupp WJ, Singh N, et al. Population genomic analysis of Aegilops tauschii identifies targets for bread wheat improvement. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;40:422–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao X, Guo Y, Kang L, Yin C, Bi A, Xu D, Zhang Z, Zhang J, Yang X, Xu J, et al. Population genomics unravels the Holocene history of bread wheat and its relatives. Nat Plants. 2023;9:403–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Doebley JF, Gaut BS, Smith BD. The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell. 2006;127:1309–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Scott MF, Botigue LR, Brace S, Stevens CJ, Mullin VE, Stevenson A, Thomas MG, Fuller DQ, Mott R. A 3,000-year-old Egyptian emmer wheat genome reveals dispersal and domestication history. Nat Plants. 2019;5:1120–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bi A, Xu D, Kang L, Guo Y, Song X, Zhao X, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Li Y, Yin C, et al. An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,062 wheat genomes. bioRxiv. 2023:535022.

  18. Chen YS, Lubberstedt T. Molecular basis of trait correlations. Trends Plant Sci. 2010;15:454–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dixon LE, Pasquariello M, Boden SA. TEOSINTE BRANCHED1 regulates height and stem internode length in bread wheat. J Exp Bot. 2020;71:4742–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sheppard S, Méric G, Swansea University. Campylobacter ecology and evolution. Norfolk: Caister Academic Press; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shukla GK. Some statistical aspects of the homogeneity of variance in a two-way classification. Biometrics. 1972;28:1063–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Flintham JE, Borner A, Worland AJ, Gale MD. Optimizing wheat grain yield: effects of Rht (gibberellin-insensitive) dwarfing genes. J Agric Sci. 1997;128:11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pu X, Tang YY, Zhang MH, Li T, Qiu XB, Zhang JY, Wang JH, Li LL, Yang Z, Su Y, et al. Identification and candidate gene mining of HvSS1, a novel qualitative locus on chromosome 6H, regulating the uppermost internode elongation in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2021;134:2481–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao DD, Son JH, Farooq M, Kim KM. Identification of candidate gene for internode length in rice to enhance resistance to lodging using QTL analysis. Plants-Basel. 2021;10:1369–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Sato-Izawa K, Nakamura S, Matsumoto T. Mutation of rice bc1 gene affects internode elongation and induces delayed cell wall deposition in developing internodes. Plant Signal Behav. 2020;15:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gomez-Ariza J, Brambilla V, Vicentini G, Landini M, Cerise M, Carrera E, Shrestha R, Chiozzotto R, Galbiati F, Caporali E, et al. A transcription factor coordinating internode elongation and photoperiodic signals in rice. Nat Plants. 2019;5:358–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Smith HMS, Hake S. The interaction of two homeobox genes, BREVIPEDICELLUS and PENNYWISE, regulates internode patterning in the Arabidopsis inflorescence. Plant Cell. 2003;15:1717–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. McKim SM. Moving on up - controlling internode growth. New Phytol. 2020;226:672–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gaur A, Jindal Y, Singh V, Tiwari R, Kumar D, Kaushik D, Singh J, Narwal S, Jaiswal S, Iquebal MA, et al. GWAS to identify novel QTNs for WSCs accumulation in wheat peduncle under different water regimes. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:825687.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Govta N, Polda I, Sela H, Cohen Y, Beckles DM, Korol AB, Fahima T, Saranga Y, Krugman T. Genome-wide association study in bread wheat identifies genomic regions associated with grain yield and quality under contrasting water availability. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:10575–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Cui F, Li J, Ding AM, Zhao CH, Wang L, Wang XQ, Li SS, Bao YG, Li XF, Feng DS, et al. Conditional QTL mapping for plant height with respect to the length of the spike and internode in two mapping populations of wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2011;122:1517–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wardlaw IF. Tansley review no. 27 The control of carbon partitioning in plants. New Phytol. 1990;116:341–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kong LA, Wang FH, Feng B, Li SD, Si JS, Zhang B. The structural and photosynthetic characteristics of the exposed peduncle of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): an important photosynthate source for grain-filling. BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10:141–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu C, Zheng S, Gui JS, Fu CJ, Yu HS, Song DL, Shen JH, Qin P, Liu XM, Han B, et al. Shortened basal internodes encodes a gibberellin 2-oxidase and contributes to lodging resistance in rice. Mol Plant. 2018;11:288–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schrager-Lavelle A, Gath NN, Devisetty UK, Carrera E, Lopez-Diaz I, Blazquez MA, Maloof JN. The role of a class III gibberellin 2-oxidase in tomato internode elongation. Plant J. 2019;97:603–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Peltonen-Sainio P, Kangas A, Salo Y, Jauhiainen L. Grain number dominates grain weight in temperate cereal yield determination: evidence based on 30 years of multi-location trials. Field Crop Res. 2007;100:179–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shearman VJ, Sylvester-Bradley R, Scott RK, Foulkes MJ. Physiological processes associated with wheat yield progress in the UK. Crop Sci. 2005;45:175–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ma LY, Bao J, Guo LB, Zeng DL, Li XM, Ji ZJ, Xia YW, Yang CD, Qian Q. Quantitative trait loci for panicle layer uniformity identified in doubled haploid lines of rice in two environments. J Integr Plant Biol. 2009;51:818–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhao CH, Zhang N, Wu YZ, Sun H, Liu C, Fan XL, Yan XM, Xu HX, Ji J, Cui F. QTL for spike-layer uniformity and their influence on yield-related traits in wheat. BMC Genet. 2019;20:23–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhou KY, Lin Y, Jiang XJ, Zhou WL, Wu FK, Li CX, Wei YM, Liu YX. Identification and validation of quantitative trait loci mapping for spike-layer uniformity in wheat. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:1052–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Bates D, Machler M, Bolker BM, Walker SC. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67:1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sun C, Dong Z, Zhao L, Ren Y, Zhang N, Chen F. The Wheat 660K SNP array demonstrates great potential for marker-assisted selection in polyploid wheat. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020;18:1354–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Shi S, Yuan N, Yang M, Du ZL, Wang JY, Sheng X, Wu JY, Xiao JF. Comprehensive assessment of genotype imputation performance. Hum Hered. 2017;83:107–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Browning BL, Zhou Y, Browning SR. A one-penny imputed genome from next-generation reference panels. Am J Hum Genet. 2018;103:338–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Browning BL, Tian XW, Zhou Y, Browning SR. Fast two-stage phasing of large-scale sequence data. Am J Hum Genet. 2021;108:1880–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang W, Wang Z, Li X, Ni Z, Hu Z, Xin M, Peng H, Yao Y, Sun Q, Guo W. SnpHub: an easy-to-set-up web server framework for exploring large-scale genomic variation data in the post-genomic era with applications in wheat. Gigascience. 2020;9:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kang HM, Sul JH, Service SK, Zaitlen NA, Kong SY, Freimer NB, Sabatti C, Eskin E. Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2010;42:348–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Gao F, Ming C, Hu WJ, Li HP. New software for the fast estimation of population recombination rates (FastEPRR) in the genomic era. G3. 2016;6:1563–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Dong SS, He WM, Ji JJ, Zhang C, Guo Y, Yang TL. LDBlockShow: a fast and convenient tool for visualizing linkage disequilibrium and haplotype blocks based on variant call format files. Brief Bioinform. 2021;22:1–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Otasek D, Morris JH, Boucas J, Pico AR, Demchak B. Cytoscape automation: empowering workflow-based network analysis. Genome Biol. 2019;20:185–99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Shin JH, Blay S, McNeney B, Graham J. LDheatmap: an R function for graphical display of pairwise linkage disequilibria between single nucleotide polymorphisms. J Stat Softw. 2006;16:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Chen H, Patterson N, Reich D. Population differentiation as a test for selective sweeps. Genome Res. 2010;20:393–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Martin SH, Davey JW, Jiggins CD. Evaluating the use of ABBA-BABA statistics to locate introgressed loci. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:244–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhao X, Guo Y, Kang L, Yin C, Bi A, Xu D, Zhang Z, Zhang J, Yang X, Xu J, Xu S, Song X, Zhang M, Li Y, Kear P, Wang J, Liu Z, Fu X, Lu F. Genome variation map. 2023. http://bigd.big.ac.cn/gvm/getProjectDetail?project=GVM000463.

  55. Assanga SO, Fuentealba M, Zhang G, Tan C, Dhakal S, Rudd JC, Ibrahim AMH, Xue Q, Haley S, Chen J, et al. Mapping of quantitative trait loci for grain yield and its components in a US popular winter wheat TAM 111 using 90K SNPs. PLoS One. 2017;12:1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Beales J, Turner A, GriYths S, Snape JW, Laurie DA. A pseudo-response regulator is misexpressed in the photoperiod insensitive Ppd-D1a mutant of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2007;115:721–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Cui F, Zhao C, Ding A, Li J, Wang L, Li X, Bao Y, Li J, Wang H. Construction of an integrative linkage map and QTL mapping of grain yield-related traits using three related wheat RIL populations. Theor Appl Genet. 2014;127:659–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Gao Y, An K, Guo W, Chen Y, Zhang R, Zhang X, Chang S, Rossi V, Jin F, Cao X, et al. The endosperm-specific transcription factor TaNAC019 regulates glutenin and starch accumulation and its elite allele improves wheat grain quality. Plant Cell. 2021;33:603–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Schilling S, Kennedy A, Pan S, Jermiin LS, Melzer R. Genome-wide analysis of MIKC-type MADS-box genes in wheat: pervasive duplications, functional conservation and putative neofunctionalization. New Phytol. 2020;225:511–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Guan P, Lu L, Jia L, Kabir MR, Zhang J, Lan T, Zhao Y, Xin M, Hu Z, Yao Y, et al. Global QTL analysis identifies genomic regions on chromosomes 4A and 4B harboring stable loci for yield-related traits across different environments in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:529–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Huang XQ, Cloutier S, Lycar L, Radovanovic N, Humphreys DG, Noll JS, Somers DJ, Brown PD. Molecular detection of QTLs for agronomic and quality traits in a doubled haploid population derived from two Canadian wheats (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2006;113:753–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Kumar A, Mantovani EE, Seetan R, Soltani A, Echeverry-Solarte M, Jain S, Simsek S, Doehlert D, Alamri MS, Elias EM, et al. Dissection of genetic factors underlying wheat kernel shape and size in an elite x nonadapted cross using a high density SNP linkage map. Plant Genome. 2016;9:1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Kumar N, Kulwal PL, Gaur A, Tyagi AK, Khurana JP, Khurana P, Balyan HS, Gupta PK. QTL analysis for grain weight in common wheat. Euphytica. 2006;151:135–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Yan L, Fu D, Li C, Blechl A, Tranquilli G, Bonafede M, Sanchez A, Valarik M, Yasuda S, Dubcovsky J. The wheat and barley vernalization gene VRN3 is an orthologue of FT. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:19581–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Zhang DJ, Zhang XX, Xu W, Hu TT, Ma JH, Zhang YF, Hou J, Hao CY, Zhang XY, Li T. TaGW2L, a GW2-like RING finger E3 ligase, positively regulates heading date in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Crop J. 2022;10:972–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Liu J, Wu BH, Singh RP, Velu G. QTL mapping for micronutrients concentration and yield component traits in a hexaploid wheat mapping population. J Cereal Sci. 2019;88:57–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Mohler V, Albrecht T, Castell A, Diethelm M, Schweizer G, Hartl L. Considering causal genes in the genetic dissection of kernel traits in common wheat. J Appl Genet. 2016;57:467–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Moore JW, Herrera-Foessel S, Lan C, Schnippenkoetter W, Ayliffe M, Huerta-Espino J, Lillemo M, Viccars L, Milne R, Periyannan S, et al. A recently evolved hexose transporter variant confers resistance to multiple pathogens in wheat. Nat Genet. 2015;47:1494–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Paolacci AR, Tanzarella OA, Porceddu E, Varotto S, Ciaffi M. Molecular and phylogenetic analysis of MADS-box genes of MIKC type and chromosome location of SEP-like genes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Mol Genet Genomics. 2007;278:689–708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Peng J, Richards DE, Hartley NM, Murphy GP, Devos KM, Flintham JE, Beales J, Fish LJ, Worland AJ, Pelica F, et al. ‘Green revolution’ genes encode mutant gibberellin response modulators. Nature. 1999;400:256–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Shi WP, Hao CY, Zhang Y, Cheng JY, Zhang Z, Liu J, Yi X, Cheng XM, Sun DZ, Xu YH, et al. A combined association mapping and linkage analysis of kernel number per spike in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1412–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Sun XY, Wu K, Zhao Y, Kong FM, Han GZ, Jiang HM, Huang XJ, Li RJ, Wang HG, Li SS. QTL analysis of kernel shape and weight using recombinant inbred lines in wheat. Euphytica. 2009;165:615–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Wu QH, Chen YX, Zhou SH, Fu L, Chen JJ, Xiao Y, Zhang D, Ouyang SH, Zhao XJ, Cui Y, et al. High-density genetic linkage map construction and QTL mapping of grain shape and size in the wheat population Yanda 1817 x Beinong6. PLoS One. 2015;10:1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Wu XY, Cheng RR, Xue SL, Kong ZX, Wan HS, Li GQ, Huang YL, Jia HY, Jia JZ, Zhang LX, Ma ZQ. Precise mapping of a quantitative trait locus interval for spike length and grain weight in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Mol Breed. 2014;33:129–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Yao FQ, Li XH, Wang H, Song YN, Li ZQ, Li XG, Gao XQ, Zhang XS, Bie XM. Down-expression of TaPIN1s increases the tiller number and grain yield in wheat. BMC Plant Biol. 2021;21:443–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Han YC, Liu N, Li C, Wang SW, Jia LH, Zhang R, Li H, Tan JF, Xue HW, Zheng WM. TaMADS2-3D, a MADS transcription factor gene, regulates phosphate starvation responses in plants. Crop J. 2022;10:243–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Zhang L, He G, Li Y, Yang Z, Liu T, Xie X, Kong X, Sun J. PIL transcription factors directly interact with SPLs and repress tillering/branching in plants. New Phytol. 2021;233:1414–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Zikhali M, Wingen LU, Leverington-Waite M, Specel S, Griffiths S. The identification of new candidate genes Triticum aestivum FLOWERING LOCUS T3–B1 (TaFT3-B1) and TARGET OF EAT1 (TaTOE1-B1) controlling the short-day photoperiod response in bread wheat. Plant Cell Environ. 2017;40:2678–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Acevedo-Garcia J, Spencer D, Thieron H, Reinstadler A, Hammond-Kosack K, Phillips AL, Panstruga R. mlo-based powdery mildew resistance in hexaploid bread wheat generated by a non-transgenic TILLING approach. Plant Biotechnol J. 2017;15:367–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Carrera A, Echenique V, Zhang W, Helguera M, Manthey F, Schrager A, Picca A, Cervigni G, Dubcovsky J. A deletion at the Lpx-B1 locus is associated with low lipoxygenase activity and improved pasta color in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp durum). J Cereal Sci. 2007;45:67–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Chai L, Xin M, Dong C, Chen Z, Zhai H, Zhuang J, Cheng X, Wang N, Geng J, Wang X, et al. A natural variation in Ribonuclease H-like gene underlies Rht8 to confer “Green Revolution” trait in wheat. Mol Plant. 2022;15:377–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Fan M, Miao F, Jia HY, Li GQ, Powers C, Nagarajan R, Alderman PD, Carver BF, Ma ZQ, Yan LL. O-linked N-acetylglucosamine transferase is involved in fine regulation of flowering time in winter wheat. Nat Commun. 2021;12:2303–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Faris JD, Fellers JP, Brooks SA, Gill BS. A bacterial artificial chromosome contig spanning the major domestication locus Q in wheat and identification of a candidate gene. Genetics. 2003;164:311–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Guo LJ, Ma M, Wu LN, Zhou MD, Li MY, Wu BW, Li L, Liu XL, Jing RL, Chen W, Zhao H. Modified expression of TaCYP78A5 enhances grain weight with yield potential by accumulating auxin in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Biotechnol J. 2022;20:168–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. He XY, Zhang YL, He ZH, Wu YP, Xiao YG, Ma CX, Xia XC. Characterization of phytoene synthase 1 gene (Psy1) located on common wheat chromosome 7A and development of a functional marker. Theor Appl Genet. 2008;116:213–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Himi E, Noda K. Red grain colour gene (R) of wheat is a Myb-type transcription factor. Euphytica. 2005;143:239–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Hou J, Jiang Q, Hao C, Wang Y, Zhang H, Zhang X. Global selection on sucrose synthase haplotypes during a century of wheat breeding. Plant Physiol. 2014;164:1918–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Jia ML, Li YA, Wang ZY, Tao S, Sun GL, Kong XC, Wang K, Ye XG, Liu SS, Geng SF, et al. TaIAA21 represses TaARF25-mediated expression of TaERFs required for grain size and weight development in wheat. Plant J. 2021;108:1754–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Kong XC, Wang F, Geng SF, Guan JT, Tao S, Jia ML, Sun GL, Wang ZY, Wang K, Ye XG, et al. The wheat AGL6-like MADS-box gene is a master regulator for floral organ identity and a target for spikelet meristem development manipulation. Plant Biotechnol J. 2022;20:75–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Li A, Hao C, Wang Z, Geng S, Jia M, Wang F, Han X, Kong X, Yin L, Tao S, et al. Wheat breeding history reveals synergistic selection of pleiotropic genomic sites for plant architecture and grain yield. Mol Plant. 2022;7:504–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Li B, Liu D, Li QR, Mao XG, Li A, Wang JY, Chang XP, Jing RL. Overexpression of wheat gene TaMOR improves root system architecture and grain yield in Oryza sativa. J Exp Bot. 2016;67:4155–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Nemoto Y, Kisaka M, Fuse T, Yano M, Ogihara Y. Characterization and functional analysis of three wheat genes with homology to the CONSTANS flowering time gene in transgenic rice. Plant J. 2003;36:82–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Nilsen KT, Walkowiak S, Xiang DQ, Gao P, Quilichini TD, Willick IR, Byrns B, N’Diaye A, Ens J, Wiebe K, et al. Copy number variation of TdDof controls solid-stemmed architecture in wheat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:28708–18.

  94. Pallotta M, Schnurbusch T, Hayes J, Hay A, Baumann U, Paull J, Langridge P, Sutton T. Molecular basis of adaptation to high soil boron in wheat landraces and elite cultivars. Nature. 2014;514:88–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Wang W, Pan QL, Tian B, He F, Chen YY, Bai GH, Akhunova A, Trick HN, Akhunov E. Gene editing of the wheat homologs of TONNEAU1-recruiting motif encoding gene affects grain shape and weight in wheat. Plant J. 2019;100:251–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Wei JL, Liao SS, Li MZ, Zhu B, Wang HC, Gu L, Yin HY, Du XY. AetSRG1 contributes to the inhibition of wheat Cd accumulation by stabilizing phenylalanine ammonia lyase. J Hazard Mater. 2022;428:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Xiao J, Xu SJ, Li CH, Xu YU, Xing LJ, Niu YD, Huan Q, Tang YM, Zhao CP, Wagner D, et al. O-GlcNAc-mediated interaction between VER2 and TaGRP2 elicits TaVRN1 mRNA accumulation during vernalization in winter wheat. Nat Commun. 2014;5:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Dongdong Li and Dr. Shuqin Jiang (College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China) for the suggestions of data analyses.

Review history

The review history is available as Additional file 3.

Peer review information

Wenjing She was the primary editor of this article and managed its editorial process and peer review in collaboration with the rest of the editorial team.

Funding

This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDA24010104-2) to Z.G., the National Key Research and Development Program (2022YFF1002904) to F.L, the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA24020201) to F.L.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Z.G. initiated the project. Z.G., F.L., and Y.H. designed and supervised the experiments. Y.L., A.B., X.Z., D.X., X.Z, and C.H. performed sequencing and genomic-variant calls. Y.L., K.S., and J.D carried out GWAS analysis, haplotype analysis, and functional validation. Y.L., C.Y., Z.W., H.W., K.S., J.W., X.Y., Z.S., B.Y., D.L., L.Z., and L.S. conducted field experiments and phenotyping. X.X., Y.H., and Z.H. developed the genetic populations. Y.L. plotted manuscript figures. All authors were involved in the writing and editing of the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yuanfeng Hao, Fei Lu or Zifeng Guo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Phylogenetic relationships and population structures. Figure S2. Geographical distribution and breeding selection of the haplotype blocks associated with the length of the second internode on chromosome 1A. Figure S3. Geographical distribution and breeding selection of the haplotype blocks associated with the length of the third internode on chromosome 3D. Figure S4. Geographical distribution and breeding selection of the haplotype blocks associated with the length of the fourth internode on chromosome 2A. Figure S5. The evolutionary relationship of the haplotypes for the loci for the length of second internode, third internode, four internode.

Additional file 2: Table S1.

Summary of the 306 worldwide wheat accessions. Table S2. Comparison of the eight plant architecture traits between two environments. Table S3. Detailed information of all significantly associated SNPs for the investigated traits> 5). Table S4. The 330 identified loci associated with investigated traits in this study. Table S5. Overlap between the known genes/QTLs and 330 identified loci in this study. Table S6. XP-CLR scores for the known genes. Table S7. The haplotypes of four major loci for the length of the four internodes in 831 Chinese wheat accessions. Table S8. The phenotypic data for the varieties from the seven continents/regions. Table S9. The phenotypic data of the haplotypes of the four major loci for the length of the four internodes. Table S10. The distribution of haplotypes of the four internodes in 306 worldwide accessions. Table S11. The genotypic data of all the varieties in the first pedigree. Table S12. The genotypic data of all the varieties in the second pedigree. Table S13. The interaction between environments and haplotypes for the length of the four internodes. Table S14. The interaction between environments and haplotypes for the length of the four internodes. Table S15. The 432 wheat varieties used for the analysis of the evolutionary relationship of the haplotypes. Table S16. The haplotype combinations for the length of the four internodes in 306 worldwide wheat accessions. Table S17. The haplotype combinations for the length of the four internodes in 306 worldwide wheat accessions. Table S18. The distribution of haplotype combinations for the length of the four internodes in 831 Chinese wheat accessions. Table S19. The phenotypic data of the four major haplotypes of TraesCS1A02G064800 in 306 worldwide wheat accessions. Table S20. The allele distribution of the SNP used in the RILs in the 306 worldwide wheat accessions. Table S21. The phenotypic data of RILs.

Additional file 3.

Review history.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Shen, K., Yin, C. et al. Genetic basis of geographical differentiation and breeding selection for wheat plant architecture traits. Genome Biol 24, 114 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-023-02932-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-023-02932-x

Keywords