Skip to main content

Correspondence

Genome Biology recognises the importance of scientific debate around published articles and considers Correspondence articles relating to papers that have been published in the journal. However, the decision about whether to publish any piece of Correspondence is at the discretion of the Editor. To be considered, Correspondence articles must directly relate to a paper previously published in Genome Biology, and must contribute a substantive scientific discussion directly in relation to that paper. 

All Correspondence will also be sent to the authors of the original Genome Biology paper, for their signed comments and their response may also be published. The editors reserve the right to edit and/or peer review Correspondence at their discretion.

Correspondence articles should be no longer than 800 words in length and should contain no more than 15 references and no more than 2 display items (boxes, tables or figures). They should be submitted through the journal’s online submission system.

Reporting standards for this article type are the same as for other research publications in the journal. Please see the guidelines for our Research articles for detailed information.

Submit manuscript

Annual Journal Metrics

  • 2022 Citation Impact
    12.3 - 2-year Impact Factor
    17.4 - 5-year Impact Factor
    3.476 - SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper)
    9.249 - SJR (SCImago Journal Rank)

    2022 Speed
    25 days submission to first editorial decision for all manuscripts (Median)
    218 days submission to accept (Median)

    2022 Usage 
    6,405,972 downloads
    78,992 Altmetric mentions 

Peer Review Taxonomy

This journal is participating in a pilot of NISO/STM's Working Group on Peer Review Taxonomy, to identify and standardize definitions and terminology in peer review practices in order to make the peer review process for articles and journals more transparent. Further information on the pilot is available here.

The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal:

  • Identity transparency: Single anonymized
  • Reviewer interacts with: Editor
  • Review information published: Review reports. Reviewer Identities reviewer opt in. Author/reviewer communication

We welcome your feedback on this Peer Review Taxonomy Pilot. Please can you take the time to complete this short survey.