Skip to main content

Volume 12 Supplement 1

Beyond the Genome 2011

Meeting abstracts

Beyond the Genome 2011. Go to conference site.

Washington, DC, USA19-22 September 2011

Concatenated PDF 12S1

Page 1 of 3

  1. Authors: Nidhi Bindal, Simon A Forbes, David Beare, Prasad Gunasekaran, Kenric Leung, Chai Yin Kok, Mingming Jia, Sally Bamford, Charlotte Cole, Sari Ward, Jon Teague, Michael R Stratton, Peter Campbell and Andrew P Futreal
    Citation: Genome Biology 2011 12(Suppl 1):P3
  2. Authors: Yi-Ping Fu, Indu Kohaar, Adam Mumy, Wei Tang, Brian Muchmore, Patricia Porter-Gill, Luyang Liu, Jonine Figueroa, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Dalsu Baris, Mark Purdue, Michael Thun, Demetrius Albanes, Nuria Malats, Francisco X Real, Manolis Kogevinas…
    Citation: Genome Biology 2011 12(Suppl 1):P4
  3. Authors: Alan F Rope, Kai Wang, Rune Evjenth, Jinchuan Xing, Jennifer J Johnston, Jeffrey J Swensen, Evan W Johnson, Barry Moore, Chad D Huff, Lynne M Bird, John C Carey, John M Opitz, Cathy A Stevens, Christa Schank, Deborah Heidi Fain, Reid Robison…
    Citation: Genome Biology 2011 12(Suppl 1):P13
  4. Authors: Wei Tang, Yi-Ping Fu, Jonine D Figueroa, Núria Malats, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Nilanjan Chatterjee, Manolis Kogevinas, Dalsu Baris, Michael Thun, Jennifer L Hall, Immaculata De Vivo, Demetrius Albanes, Patricia Porter-Gill, Mark P Purdue, Laurie Burdett, Luyang Liu…
    Citation: Genome Biology 2011 12(Suppl 1):P19

Annual Journal Metrics

  • Citation Impact 2023
    Journal Impact Factor: 10.1
    5-year Journal Impact Factor: 16.5
    Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 2.521
    SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 7.197

    Speed 2023
    Submission to first editorial decision (median days): 22
    Submission to acceptance (median days): 277

    Usage 2023
    Downloads: 6,688,476
    Altmetric mentions: 12,515

Peer Review Taxonomy

This journal is participating in a pilot of NISO/STM's Working Group on Peer Review Taxonomy, to identify and standardize definitions and terminology in peer review practices in order to make the peer review process for articles and journals more transparent. Further information on the pilot is available here.

The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal:

  • Identity transparency: Single anonymized
  • Reviewer interacts with: Editor
  • Review information published: Review reports. Reviewer Identities reviewer opt in. Author/reviewer communication

We welcome your feedback on this Peer Review Taxonomy Pilot. Please can you take the time to complete this short survey.