- Short Report
- Open Access
- Published:

# Genomic GPS: using genetic distance from individuals to public data for genomic analysis without disclosing personal genomes

*Genome Biology*
**volume 20**, Article number: 175 (2019)

## Abstract

Genomic global positioning system (GPS) applies the multilateration technique commonly used in the GPS to genomic data. In the framework we present here, investigators calculate genetic distances from their samples to reference samples, which are from data held in the public domain, and share this information with others. This sharing enables certain types of genomic analysis, such as identifying sample overlaps and close relatives, decomposing ancestry, and mapping of geographical origin without disclosing personal genomes. Thus, our method can be seen as a balance between open data sharing and privacy protection.

## Main text

It is crucial to balance privacy protection and data sharing in genomics [1,2,3]. Full disclosure of genomic data benefits the research community through productive data reuse but increases the chances of privacy breaches. Full closure, by contrast, ensures privacy but discourages collaborative science.

Here we present a method called *genomic GPS* that aims to achieve a balance between data sharing and privacy protection. It allows sharing of information to a degree sufficient for approximating relative genetic distance of an individual from either another individual or a group. Identification of closer relatives and population genomic analyses, such as ancestry decomposition and geographical origin mapping, are possible. Importantly, though, the shared information conceals individual genotypes, making it extremely difficult to reconstruct the personal genomes.

Our method builds upon *multilateration*, a localization technique for wireless sensor networks in which spatial coordinates of a node with an unknown position are inferred by measuring the distances from the node to several reference nodes at known positions [4]. For example, in the GPS navigation system of an aircraft, the distances from the aircraft to satellites are calculated from time lags in transmitted radio signals. These distances are then used to calculate the aircraft’s position (Fig. 1a).

To apply multilateration in a genomic context, we first evaluated this technique’s characteristics in a multidimensional space. We derived a mathematical proof showing that in *N*-dimensional space, and with *K* reference nodes with known positions, an unknown node’s coordinates can be unequivocally identified if *K* > *N* (Additional file 1: Supplementary Note). Perhaps more importantly, we derived another proof showing that an unknown node’s coordinates can never be exactly specified if *K* < *N* − 1 (Additional file 1: Supplementary Note). This was encouraging because it suggested that the distances to known nodes convey limited information under this condition and can be safely shared without disclosing the actual location.

Encouraged by this proof, we applied multilateration to genomic data. We considered an individual’s genotype data to be a node in *N*-dimensional space where each coordinate represents each of *N* polymorphic loci. In this space, the pairwise Euclidean distance between nodes represents the genetic distance between individuals (Fig. 1b). We then measured genetic distances from that individual to *K* reference individuals in open datasets such as 1000Genomes [5]; these datasets are analogous to satellites with known positions. We call the length-*K* vector of distances the “*distance vector*”. The core idea of our approach is to share a distance vector that would allow certain types of genomic analysis without disclosing the personal genome data (Fig. 1c).

If we imagined that genotypes were real numbers, it is theoretically impossible to reconstruct the genotypes as long as *N* ≫ *K*, as shown by our proof. Unfortunately, genotype data resides in a very restricted space, {0, 1, 2}^{N}. Nevertheless, the search space is still large enough to prevent data reconstruction in practice. We designed a greedy algorithm that tries to reconstruct the genotype data given a distance vector and reference data (Additional file 1: Supplementary Note) and applied it to simulated data. To avoid local optima, we allowed multiple restarts of the algorithm to find the best possible solution. The predicted genotypes were not much better than a coarse prediction based on allele frequency (Additional file 1: Figure S1). These empirical simulations showed that it was impractical to reconstruct genotypes from a distance vector.

Sharing of distance vectors facilitates several applications. First, we can use the similarity of two distance vectors to find sample overlaps or close relatives. Intuitively, if genomes from two individuals resemble each other, their distance vectors will also be similar. To systematically interpret the similarity in distance vectors, we designed the following statistic. Let *X*_{t, n} ∈ {0, 1, 2} be the reference allele count of individual *t* at SNP *n*. The squared Euclidean distance between individuals *t* and *u* is \( {D}_{t,u}=\sum \limits_{n=1}^N{\left({X}_{t,n}-{X}_{u,n}\right)}^2 \). Let *D*_{t, k} be the distance between *t* and reference individual *k*. Given *K* reference individuals, the distance vector of individual *t* is *v*_{t} = (*D*_{t, 1}, *D*_{t, 2}…, *D*_{t, K}). Then, we define a statistic that compares two distance vectors, *v*_{t} and *v*_{u}:

where Σ is the covariance matrix of *v*_{t} − *v*_{u}. We showed (Additional file 1: Supplementary Note) that the (*i*, *j*)th element of Σ is

where *p*_{n} is the population allele frequency of SNP *n*. The statistic *s*_{overlap} follows a *χ*^{2} distribution with *K* degrees of freedom if *t* and *u* are unrelated (Fig. 1d); thus, we can test whether two individuals are related by calculating a *P* value from the lower tail. The false positive rate was well controlled (Additional file 1: Table S1 and Figure S2), and high power was achievable for reasonable numbers of *N* and *K* (Fig. 1e). This statistic can be useful if researchers at different institutions want to check whether there are overlapping individuals in their samples, because sample overlaps can contaminate the result of aggregate studies such as meta-analyses. Instead of the squared Euclidean distance, one can also use genetic relatedness metric as the measure of genetic distance. Given the standardized allele count \( {\overline{X}}_{t,n}=\left({X}_{t,n}-2{p}_n\right)/\sqrt{2{p}_n\left(1-{p}_n\right)} \), the genetic relatedness between individuals *t* and *u* is \( {G}_{t,u}=\frac{1}{N}{\sum}_{n=1}^N{\overline{X}}_{t,n}{\overline{X}}_{u,n} \) [6]. Using genetic relatedness, the results were similar (Additional file 1: Supplementary Note and Figure S3). We performed real data-based analysis using the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (WTCCC) data [7] by designing studies with overlapping samples (Additional file 1: Supplementary Note). Our method could detect overlapping samples with perfect sensitivity and specificity (Fig. 1f), when using the 1000Genomes data [5] as reference.

We then examined whether close relatives were also distinguishable using our statistic. We simulated different degrees of relatives and predicted the true relationship for a given pair using our statistic. Among first-degree relatives, 79% were correctly predicted as first degree (Additional file 1: Figure S4 and S5). Relatives beyond the first degree were less distinguishable, where 39% and 21% of second- and third-degree relatives were correctly predicted, respectively. In sum, distance vectors contain sufficient information to determine overlapping samples and to give clues for close relatives, which can be useful for certain types of analyses. However, such a disclosure could be considered a leak of information in some situations. In those situations, alternatives such as secure hashing [3] can be considered for detecting sample overlaps.

The second application for sharing a distance vector is population genomic analyses. The distance vector contains information that can infer the genetic spatial structure of individuals. Recent studies showed that genetic data enabled the geographical origin of an individual to be located on a two-dimensional (2D) map [8, 9]. Novembre et al. [8] applied principal component analysis (PCA) to the genomic data of 3192 Europeans from 36 countries (the POPRES dataset [10]), where the two main principal components (PC) matched the geographical map of Europe with great accuracy. We designed a procedure that converts a distance vector into an approximate position in the PC space (Additional file 1: Supplementary Note). Consider that we have *K* reference individuals. We first apply eigendecomposition to their genetic relatedness matrix (GRM) to obtain the top two eigenvectors (PCs) in a 2D space, \( \mathcal{P} \). Given a target individual, we want to approximate its position in \( \mathcal{P} \). Suppose that we have the target’s distance vector to *K* references based on the genetic relatedness metric. Then, we can construct the GRM of the *K* + 1 individuals (the references and the target) by appending the distance vector to the GRM. We decompose this (*K* + 1) × (*K* + 1) GRM to obtain a PC map of *K* + 1 individuals in a new 2D space, \( \mathcal{P}^{\prime } \). The positions of the *K* references in \( \mathcal{P}^{\prime } \) are not identical to their positions in \( \mathcal{P} \), because adding one more datapoint in PCA can distort the positions of the other points (Additional file 1: Figure S6). Because of this subtle difference, in order to project the target’s point from \( \mathcal{P}^{\prime } \) to \( \mathcal{P} \), we apply another layer of “multilateration”. Using the map in \( \mathcal{P}^{\prime } \), we calculate the 2D Euclidean distances between the target and the references to create a distance vector. Using the standard multilateration technique, this distance vector can be used to map the target’s position in \( \mathcal{P} \) by the least-square minimization [4]. After repeating this procedure for each target, the approximated PC map of all target individuals is obtained by removing reference datapoints from \( \mathcal{P} \).

To evaluate the performance of our method, we used the POPRES data [10] (Additional file 1: Table S2) using 60% of the individuals as samples and 40% as references (Additional file 1: Supplementary Note). The mapping of the origins of the samples using our method (Fig. 2a) closely resembled the PC mapping based on actual genotype data (Fig. 2b). The output image resembled the geographic map of Europe, with geographically adjacent populations found near to each other and geographically distant populations found far apart. We then tried to map the POPRES data using the 1000Genomes samples [5] as reference data. Overall, the approximate locations of the populations were similar to the European map (Additional file 1: Figure S7). However, the distinction between the Eastern/Russian populations and the Central European populations was unclear, possibly because there is sparse data from these populations in this reference dataset [5].

Another application for sharing distance vectors in population genomics is the inference of an individual’s ethnic admixture proportions. We designed a procedure to estimate the admixture proportion of an individual only using the distance vector (Additional file 1: Supplementary Note). The idea is to approximate the location of a target individual in the PC map of the multiple reference populations. We measure the Euclidean distance of the individual to the centroid of each candidate population and estimate the ancestry proportions as being inversely proportional to these distances. Using the 1000Genomes data, we simulated admixed individuals from two populations, gradually varying the proportions. When the two populations were genetically distant (European and Asian), the estimated proportion was close to the true proportion (*r*^{2} = 0.98, Fig. 2c). When the two populations were genetically close (two European countries), the estimation was less accurate but showed high correlation to the true proportion (*r*^{2} = 0.86, Fig. 2c). We then combined data for three populations (European, Asian, and African) in varying proportions. For comparison, we applied an existing method, ADMIXTURE [11], which uses actual genotype data (Additional file 1: Supplementary Note). Both ADMIXTURE and our method gave estimations that were highly concordant with the true proportions (Fig. 2d).

We have presented a novel technique that applies multilateration to genomic data. Our method allows sharing distance vectors with other investigators or institutions, enabling certain types of genomic analysis while making it difficult to reconstruct the personal genomes. We expect that our approach will find interesting applications in the future in addition to those described herein.

## Methods

See Additional file 1: Supplementary Note for additional methods not described above**.**

## Availability of data and materials

The Genomic GPS is available at https://github.com/hanlab-SNU/GenomicGPS [12] under the MIT license (Software DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3255141 [13]). Genotype data for 1000Genomes Phase 1 was downloaded from http://www.cog-genomics.org/plink/1.9/resources. Imputed haplotype data of 1000Genomes Phase 3 was downloaded from ftp://ftp.1000genomes.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/ftp/release/20130502/ [5]. WTCCC data used for sample overlap simulation can be accessible via EGA accession number EGAD00000000001 for 1958 British Birth Cohort and EGAD00000000008 for Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) samples (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ega/datasets) [7]. POPRES data used for PC map analysis is accessible via dbGaP Study accession number phs000145.v4.p2 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gap/cgi-bin/study.cgi?study_id=phs000145.v4.p2) [10]. Detailed description of datasets used in this research can be found in Additional file 1: Supplementary Note.

## References

- 1.
Erlich Y, Narayanan A. Routes for breaching and protecting genetic privacy. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15(6):409–21.

- 2.
Gymrek M, McGuire AL, Golan D, Halperin E, Erlich Y. Identifying personal genomes by surname inference. Science. 2013;339(6117):321.

- 3.
He D, Furlotte NA, Hormozdiari F, Joo JWJ, Wadia A, Ostrovsky R, et al. Identifying genetic relatives without compromising privacy. Genome Res. 2014;24(4):664–72.

- 4.
Mantilla-Gaviria I, Leonardi M, Galati G, Balbastre J. Localization algorithms for multilateration (MLAT) systems in airport surface surveillance. SIViP. 2014;9:1–10.

- 5.
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015;526:68–74.

- 6.
Yang J, Lee SH, Goddard ME, Visscher PM. GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;88(1):76–82.

- 7.
The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature. 2007;447:661–78.

- 8.
Novembre J, Johnson T, Bryc K, Kutalik Z, Boyko AR, Auton A, et al. Genes mirror geography within Europe. Nature. 2008;456(7218):98–101.

- 9.
Yang W-Y, Novembre J, Eskin E, Halperin E. A model-based approach for analysis of spatial structure in genetic data. Nat Genet. 2012;44(6):725–31.

- 10.
Nelson MR, Bryc K, King KS, Indap A, Boyko AR, Novembre J, et al. The population reference sample, POPRES: a resource for population, disease, and pharmacological genetics research. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;83(3):347–58.

- 11.
Alexander DH, Novembre J, Lange K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 2009;19(9):1655–64.

- 12.
Kim K, Baik H, Jang CS, Roh JK, Eskin E, Han B. Genomic GPS: using genetic distance from individuals to public data for genomic analysis without disclosing personal genomes. Github. 2019; Available from: https://github.com/hanlab-SNU/GenomicGPS. Accessed 30 July 2019.

- 13.
Kim K, Baik H, Jang CS, Roh JK, Eskin E, Han B. Genomic GPS: using genetic distance from individuals to public data for genomic analysis without disclosing personal genomes. Zenodo. 2019; https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3354656.

## Author information

### Author notes

### Affiliations

### Contributions

BH devised the project. KK and CSJ performed the analysis. CSJ developed the software package. HB derived mathematical proofs. KK, HB, JKR, EE, and BH wrote the manuscript. BH and EE supervised the project. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Buhm Han.

## Ethics declarations

### Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

### Consent for publication

Not applicable.

### Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

## Additional information

### Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Additional file

### Additional file 1:

Supplementary Note, Tables S1, S2 and Figures. S1-S12. (PDF 3657 kb)

## Rights and permissions

**Open Access** This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

## About this article

#### Received

#### Accepted

#### Published

#### DOI

### Keywords

- Multilateration
- Genetic distance
- Personal genome
- Data sharing
- Privacy protection