Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more
Open Access

An interaction map of circulating metabolites, immune gene networks, and their genetic regulation

  • Artika P. Nath1, 2,
  • Scott C. Ritchie2, 3,
  • Sean G. Byars3, 4,
  • Liam G. Fearnley3, 4,
  • Aki S. Havulinna5, 6,
  • Anni Joensuu5,
  • Antti J. Kangas7,
  • Pasi Soininen7, 8,
  • Annika Wennerström5,
  • Lili Milani9,
  • Andres Metspalu9,
  • Satu Männistö5,
  • Peter Würtz7, 10,
  • Johannes Kettunen5, 7, 8, 11,
  • Emma Raitoharju12,
  • Mika Kähönen13,
  • Markus Juonala14, 15,
  • Aarno Palotie6, 16, 17, 18,
  • Mika Ala-Korpela7, 8, 11, 19, 20,
  • Samuli Ripatti6, 21,
  • Terho Lehtimäki12,
  • Gad Abraham2, 3, 4,
  • Olli Raitakari22, 23,
  • Veikko Salomaa5,
  • Markus Perola5, 6, 9 and
  • Michael Inouye1, 2, 3, 4Email author
Genome Biology201718:146

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1279-y

Received: 5 January 2017

Accepted: 14 July 2017

Published: 1 August 2017

Abstract

Background

Immunometabolism plays a central role in many cardiometabolic diseases. However, a robust map of immune-related gene networks in circulating human cells, their interactions with metabolites, and their genetic control is still lacking. Here, we integrate blood transcriptomic, metabolomic, and genomic profiles from two population-based cohorts (total N = 2168), including a subset of individuals with matched multi-omic data at 7-year follow-up.

Results

We identify topologically replicable gene networks enriched for diverse immune functions including cytotoxicity, viral response, B cell, platelet, neutrophil, and mast cell/basophil activity. These immune gene modules show complex patterns of association with 158 circulating metabolites, including lipoprotein subclasses, lipids, fatty acids, amino acids, small molecules, and CRP. Genome-wide scans for module expression quantitative trait loci (mQTLs) reveal five modules with mQTLs that have both cis and trans effects. The strongest mQTL is in ARHGEF3 (rs1354034) and affects a module enriched for platelet function, independent of platelet counts. Modules of mast cell/basophil and neutrophil function show temporally stable metabolite associations over 7-year follow-up, providing evidence that these modules and their constituent gene products may play central roles in metabolic inflammation. Furthermore, the strongest mQTL in ARHGEF3 also displays clear temporal stability, supporting widespread trans effects at this locus.

Conclusions

This study provides a detailed map of natural variation at the blood immunometabolic interface and its genetic basis, and may facilitate subsequent studies to explain inter-individual variation in cardiometabolic disease.

Background

Over the past decade increasing evidence has implicated inflammation as a probable causal factor in metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. Consequently, research has begun to focus on the interplay between immunity and metabolism, or immunometabolism. While it is involved in diverse pathophysiologies, immunometabolism is particularly relevant to diseases of immense global health burden, such as type 2 diabetes (T2D) and atherosclerosis.

For T2D, immune overactivation in adipose tissue has been implicated as a key driver [1, 2]. Studies have shown that macrophage infiltration and subsequent overexpression of proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, in adipose tissues is associated with insulin resistance [1, 2]. Moreover, evidence for metabolic inflammation has been shown in other tissues where, in blood, elevated glucose and free fatty acid levels potentiate IL-1β-mediated destruction of pancreatic ß cells and subsequent T2D progression [35]. While circulating metabolites are known to be associated with cardiovascular disease [6], inflammation is an increasingly recognized factor in pathogenesis. In atherosclerosis, lipid-induced inflammatory response mechanisms have also been implicated in progression to myocardial infarction [7]. In atherogenic lesions, oxidized phospholipids are known to lead to a new macrophage phenotype [8], and cholesterol loading in macrophages promotes proinflammatory cytokine secretion [9].

Perhaps surprisingly, few large-scale studies have systematically assessed interactions between the human immune system and metabolites. Recent studies have investigated matched blood transcriptomic and metabolomic profiles to understand their interplay [1016]. However, these studies had modest sample sizes and thus have not had the power to focus on the diverse range of immune processes that interact with circulating metabolites. Furthermore, even fewer have assessed effects of expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) on immune gene networks. A robust integrated map of immunometabolic relationships and their genetic regulation would provide a foundation for investigating the differential cardiometabolic disease susceptibility amongst individuals while also identifying key target interactions for mechanistic in vivo and in vitro follow-up.

In this study, we present an integrated immunometabolic map using matched blood metabolomic and transcriptomic profiles from 2168 individuals from two population-based cohorts. We perform gene coexpression network discovery and cross-cohort replication to identify robust gene modules which encode immune-related functions. Using a high-throughput quantitative NMR metabolomics platform that can separate lipids and lipoprotein sub-fractions as well as quantify a panel of polar metabolites, we identify significant interactions between immune gene modules and circulating metabolite measures. Genome-wide scans for QTLs affecting immune gene modules identify many cis and trans loci affecting module expression. Finally, we test the long-term stability of gene modules, their interactions with metabolite measures, and genetic control using a 7-year follow-up sampling of 333 individuals.

Results and discussion

Summary of cohorts and data

We analyzed genome-wide genotype, whole blood transcriptomic, and serum metabolomics data from two population-based cohorts (“Methods” and Fig. 1). In DILGOM07, 240 males and 278 females aged 25–74 years were recruited (total N = 518). Data were available for a subset of 333 participants from DILGOM07 who were followed up after 7 years (DILGOM14). In YFS, relevant data were available for 755 males and 895 females aged 34–49 years (total N = 1650).
Fig. 1

The study design. GO Gene Ontology, SNP single nucleotide polymorphism

DILGOM and YFS genotyping was performed using Illumina Human 610 and 670 arrays, respectively, with subsequent genotype imputation performed using IMPUTE2 [17] and the 1000 Genomes Phase I version 3 reference panel. For both cohorts, whole blood transcriptome profiling was performed using Illumina HT-12 arrays and serum metabolomics profiling was carried out using the same serum NMR metabolomics platform (Brainshake Ltd) [18]. Individuals on lipid-lowering medication and pregnant women were excluded from the metabolome analyses (“Methods”). Of the 159 metabolite measures analyzed, 148 were directly quantified and 11 derived (Additional file 1: Table S1). After filtering, matched transcriptome and metabolome data were available for 440 individuals in DILGOM07 and 216 of these individuals (DILGOM14) who were profiled at 7-year follow-up. In YFS, 1575 individuals were available with similar data (see “Methods” for details).

Robust immune gene coexpression networks from blood

We first identified networks of tightly coexpressing genes in DILGOM07 and then used a permutation approach, NetRep [19], to statistically test replication patterns of density and connectivity for these networks in YFS. For module detection, we applied weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA) to all 35,422 probes in the DILGOM07 data, identifying a total of 40 modules of coexpressed genes (“Methods”). For each module, we used NetRep to calculate seven preservation statistics in the YFS, generate empirical null distributions for each of these test statistics, and calculate their corresponding P values [19, 20]. A module was considered strongly preserved if the P value was <0.001 for all seven preservation statistics (Bonferroni correction for 40 modules). Of the 40 DILGOM07 modules, 20 were strongly preserved in YFS (Additional file 2: Table S2). For each of the 20 replicated modules, we defined core gene probes, those which are most tightly coexpressed and thus robust to clustering parameters, using a permutation test of module membership (“Methods”; Additional file 3: Table S3).

To identify modules of putative immune function, we carried out Gene Ontology (GO) biological process enrichment analysis using GOrilla for the core genes of each replicated module [21]. Significant GO terms (false discovery rate (FDR) <0.05) were then summarized into representative terms based on semantic similarity using REVIGO [22] (Additional file 4: Figure S1). A module was considered immune-related if it was significantly enriched for GO terms “immune system processes” (GO:0002376) and/or “regulation of immune system processes” (GO:0002682) in the REVIGO output. Six out of 20 modules were enriched for at least one of these terms (Additional file 5: Table S4). We also identified two additional modules which were not enriched for any GO terms but have been previously linked to immune functions related to mast cell and basophil function [13] and platelet aggregation activity [23]. The eight modules encoded diverse immune functions, including cytotoxic, viral response, B cell, platelet, neutrophil, mast cell/basophil, and general immune-related functions. Each immune module’s gene content and putative biological function is summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Immune module gene content and putative biological function based on GO terms (top three shown) and literature

Module

Size

GO terms

Literature-based immune-related function of genes

Cytotoxic cell-like module (CCLM)

130

(115)

Immune system process

Defense response

Immune response

Cytotoxic effectors (GZMA, GZMB, GZMM, CTSW, PRF1 [66]); surface receptors (IL2RB, SLAMF6, CD8A, CD8B, CD2, CD247, KLRD1, KLRG1 [6668]); T and NK cell differentiation (ID2 and EOMES [69, 70]), activation (ZAP70 and CBLB [71, 72]), and recruitment (CX3CR1, CCL5, CCL4L2 [73])

Viral response module (VRM)

95

(88)

Response to virus

Type I interferon signaling pathway

Response to biotic stimulus

Type I interferon-induced antiviral activity (IFITM1, IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, IFIT5, IFI44, IFI44L, IFI6, MX1, ISG15, ISG20, HERC5 [74, 75]); viral RNA degradation (OAS1, OAS2, OAS3, OASL, DDX60 [30]); type 1 interferon-signaling pathway (IRF9, STAT1, STAT2 [76, 77])

B-cell activity module (BCM)

54

(49)

Immune system process

Immune response

B cell activation

B cell surface markers (CD79A, CD79B, CD22 [33, 78]); B cell activation (BANK1, BTLA, CD40, TNFRSF13B, TNFRSF13C [79]), development (POU2AF1, BCL11A, RASGRP3 [80]), migration (CXCR5, CCR6 [80, 81]), and their regulation (CD83, FCER2, FCRL5 [82]); antigen presentation (HLA-DOA, HLA-DOB [83])

Platelet module

(PM)a

114

(106)

Coagulation

Blood coagulation

Cell activation

Platelet receptor signaling, activation, and coagulation (GP6, GP9, ITGA2B, ITGB3, ITGB5, MGLL, MPL, MMRN1, PTK2, VCL, THBS1, F13A1, VWF, [84]); regulating platelet activity (SEPT5, TSPAN9 [85, 86])

Neutrophil module (NM)a

26

(26)

Killing of cells of other organism

Cell killing

Response to fungus

Anti-microbial, -fungal, and -viral activity (DEFA1, DEFA1B, DEFA3, DEFA4, ELANE, BPI, RNASE2, RNASE3 [8790]); neutrophil-mediated activity (AZU1, LCN2, MPO, CEACAM6, CEACAM8, OLFM4 [90, 91]) and its regulation (LCN2, CAMP, OLR1 [49, 92, 93])

Lipid-leukocyte module (LLM)a

13

(13)

Mast cell and basophil functionb

Mast cell and basophil related immune response and allergic inflammation (FCER1A, HDC, GATA2, SLC45A3, CPA3, MS4A3 [13, 94, 95])

General immune module A (GIMA)

509

(482)

Immune system process

Defense response

Regulation of response to stimulus

These modules contain genes involved in a broad range of immune processes and their regulation such as signaling; cell death; defense response to stress, inflammation, and external stimuli; leukocyte activation, migration, and adhesion

General immune module B (GIMB)

74

(69)

Immune response-activating signal transduction

Positive regulation of immune response

Activation of immune response

Size refers to the number of core genes in each module and the subset of these core genes with GO term annotations are listed in parentheses. Functions were assigned to each of these modules based on GO enrichments and literature-based searches for genes in the modules.

a Modules previously reported to have immune related function

b The LLM was not significantly enriched for any GO term

Immune module association analysis for eQTLs and metabolite measures

For each gene module, we performed a genome-wide scan to identify module QTLs (mQTLs) that regulate expression. In DILGOM07 and YFS, the module eigengene was regressed on each SNP, then mQTL test statistics were combined in a meta-analysis (“Methods”). Significant mQTLs were further examined at individual gene expression levels. A genome-wide significance level (P value <5 × 10−8) was used to identify mQTLs and significant trans effects on individual gene expression (Fig. 2 and Table 2). Leukocyte and platelet counts were available for YFS and were used to test the robustness of module associations with mQTLs and metabolite measures. Six modules showed statistically significant association with platelet or leukocyte counts (P value <0.05) (Additional file 6: Table S5); however, adjustment for leukocyte counts did not affect mQTL nor module-metabolite measure associations, with the exception of the platelet module (PM) and cytotoxic cell-like module (CCLM) discussed below (Additional file 7: Table S6). Since we did not have cell counts available for DILGOM07, all the associations between immune modules and metabolite measures discussed below, unless otherwise noted, have not been adjusted for cell counts.
Fig. 2

Module and expression QTL analysis. a Manhattan plot of meta-analyzed P values from the DILGOM/YFS module QTL analysis. The lead SNP and its closest genes are noted. Each significant mQTL locus is colored by module. The horizontal dashed line represents genome-wide (meta- P value <5 × 10−8) significance. bd Circular plots summarizing the individual gene associations (meta-P value <5 × 10−8) for the lead module QTLs in the VRM, PM, and NM. Lead SNPs and cis genes are labeled outside the ring. PM platelet module, VRM viral response module, CCLM cytotoxic cell-like module, NM neutrophil module, BCM B-cell activity module

Table 2

QTLs for immune gene modules

Module

Top SNP

Chr

Hg19 pos.

(Mb)

Allele

(minor/major)

MAF

(avg)

P value

DILGOM07

(effect size)

P value

YFS

(effect size)

Meta

P value

VRM

rs182710579

4

19768086

G/T

0.012

2.01 × 10–4 (0.05)

8.10 × 10–6 (0.02)

9.23 × 10–9

rs151234502

7

148950168

T/C

0.012

2.59 × 10–1 (0.01)

5.31 × 10–9 (0.03)

2.46 × 10–8

rs147742798

11

70947761

T/C

0.016

1.51 × 10–3 (0.04)

1.66 × 10–6 (0.02)

9.43 × 10–9

BCM

rs2523489

6

31348878

T/C

0.186

1.42 × 10–1 (0.005)

5.29 × 10–8 (0.006)

6.27 × 10–8

PM

rs1354034

3

56849749

T/C

0.284

7.11 × 10–14 (-0.02)

1.51 × 10–16 (-0.008)

7.35 × 10–28

rs28367734

6

3128657

A/G

0.108

5.40 × 10–4 (0.02)

2.02 × 10–5 (0.006)

5.44 × 10–8

NM

rs2485364

6

159512260

C/T

0.466

1.78 × 10–3 (0.009)

6.05 × 10–7 (0.004)

3.93 × 10–9

rs13297295

9

131659724

C/T

0.085

4.26 × 10–2 (0.009)

8.39 × 10–11 (0.01)

3.93 × 10–11

rs140929198

20

38555870

A/G

0.031

2.98 × 10–2 (0.03)

8.47 × 10–9 (0.01)

1.41 × 10–9

GIMA

rs2185366

8

131342722

T/C

0.421

2.0 × 10–2 (0.007)

1.52 × 10–6 (0.004)

1.05 × 10–7

Modules: VRM viral response module, BCM B-cell activity module, PM platelet module, NM neutrophil module, GIMA general immune module A. MAF minor allele frequency

Cytotoxic cell-like module

CCLM was associated with 24 metabolite measures, mainly consisting of fatty acids, intermediate density lipoproteins, and C-reactive protein (CRP; Fig. 3; Additional file 8: Table S7). Of these, the average degree of unsaturation in fatty acids was the most significant association (meta-P value = 7.23 × 10–7). The immunomodulatory effects of polyunsaturated fatty acids are well characterized; for example, omega-3 fatty acids have been shown to induce cytotoxicity in in vitro cancer cell lines as well as animal models of tumor incidence and growth [24, 25]. Adjustment of the associations between CCLM and metabolite measures for leukocyte counts resulted in the gain of 38 additional associations and loss of four (creatinine, ratio of polyunsaturated fatty acids to total fatty acids, very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) particle size, and CRP) existing associations (Additional file 7: Table S6). Varying proportions of leukocyte counts can be correlated with transcription-level variation in human blood [26] but not act to confound the latter's association with phenotypes. If this is the case, then adjusting for leukocyte count in the linear regression analysis can reduce noise and thus boost statistical power to detect an association, which may explain the additional associations noted with the CCLM module. CCLM had no significant mQTLs.
Fig. 3

Metabolite measure associations with immune gene modules. Circular heatmap of associations between individual metabolite measure and the module eigengene of each module (colored by FDR-adjusted P values). Concentric circles represent modules, with numbers in parentheses denoting total number of metabolite measures associated with that module at FDR-adjusted P value <6.25 × 10–3. NM neutrophil module, LLM lipid leukocyte module, GIMA/GIMB general immune module A/B, PM platelet module, CCLM cytotoxic cell-like module, BCM B-cell activity module, VRM viral response module. See Additional file 1: Table S1 for full metabolite descriptions

Viral response module

Three genome-wide significant mQTLs were identified for the viral response module (VRM; Fig. 2a; Table 2). The strongest mQTL, rs182710579 (meta-P value = 9.22 × 10–9), is within a known lincRNA locus (RP11-608O21.1) (Additional file 4: Figure S2a). Rs182710579 was a trans eQTL for three genes in the VRM (Fig. 2b; Additional file 9: Table S8). The strongest association was seen with CCL2 (meta-P value = 6.78 × 10–12), a pro-inflammatory chemokine involved in leukocyte recruitment during viral infection [27, 28]. Also, adipocyte-derived CCL2 is known to play an important role in obesity-associated adipose tissue inflammation and insulin resistance [29]. The next strongest mQTL, rs151234502, resides within intron 4 of the relatively unstudied ZNF212, part of a zinc finger gene cluster at 7q36 (Additional file 4: Figure S2b). Rs151234502 modulated expression of 11 VRM genes in trans (Fig. 2b; Additional file 9: Table S8). The strongest association was with OAS2 (meta-P value = 8.98 × 10–10), an interferon-induced gene encoding an enzyme promoting RNase L-mediated cleavage of viral and cellular RNA [30]. The third mQTL, rs147742798, was an intergenic SNP located between SHANK2 and DHCR7 at 11q13.4 (Additional file 4: Figure S2c). Rs147742798 was a trans eQTL for two genes in the VRM, BST2 and PARP9 (Fig. 2b; Additional file 9: Table S8). BST2 encodes a trans-membrane protein with interferon-inducible antiviral function [31]. Studies have previously shown induction of fatty acid biosynthesis by a range of viruses [32]. VRM was associated with eight metabolite measures, including amino acids (alanine, phenylalanine), fatty acids (omega-6 fatty acids, polyunsaturated fatty acids, saturated fatty acids, and total fatty acids), and cholesterol esters in medium VLDL (Fig. 3; Additional file 8: Table S7). Consistent with its putative role in viral response, VRM was strongly associated with CRP (meta P value = 2.38 × 10–10).

B-cell activity module

The B-cell activity module (BCM) was associated with 14 metabolite measures including CRP, histidine, lactate, apolipoprotiens, and mainly the medium high-density lipoprotein (HDL) subclass of lipoproteins (Fig. 3; Additional file 8: Table S7). The strongest association was seen with CRP (meta-P value = 2.65 × 10–8). Histidine was the second strongest association. This is interesting given that histidine is a substrate for histamine, and both histamine release and B-cell activity are central parts of an allergic reaction. While no mQTLs for BCM reached genome-wide significance, there was some evidence in the YFS for the MHC class I locus (Fig. 2a and Table 2). The top signal was located between HLA-B/C and MICA (rs2523489, meta-P value = 6.27 × 10–8; Additional file 4: Figure S3). The HLA class I region is well known to be associated with autoimmune diseases, where the role of B cells is well recognized. Rs2523489 was a trans eQTL for CD79B (meta-P value = 1.16 × 10–9), a subunit of the antigen-binding B-cell receptor complex [33].

Platelet module

PM had the strongest mQTL of any gene module, an intronic SNP of the ARHGEF3 gene at 3p14.3 (rs1354034; meta-P value = 7.35 × 10–28, Fig. 2a; Table 2; Additional file 4: Figure S4a). ARHGEF3 encodes a Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor, a catalyst of Rho GTPase conversion from inactive GDP-bound to active GTP-bound form. Rs1354034 was an eQTL for the majority of genes in the PM, all of which were in trans. An intergenic SNP, rs2836773 (meta-P value = 5.4 × 10–8), at the HLA locus was also identified as an mQTL for PM (Additional file 4: Figure S4b). The ARHGEF3 mQTL (rs1354034) exhibited a strong trans-regulatory effect and was associated with 61 PM genes (65 unique probes) (Fig. 2c; Additional file 9: Table S8). The top trans eQTL was ITGB3 (meta-P value = 5.09 × 10–42), a gene encoding the β3 subunit of the heterodimeric integrin receptor (integrin αIIbβ3). This integrin receptor is most highly expressed on activated platelets and plays a key role in mediating platelet adhesion and aggregation upon binding to fibrinogen and Willebrand factor [34, 35]. Our data are consistent with previous observations of the diverse trans eQTL effects of rs1354034 [23], including the putative splice-QTL effects of rs1354034 on TPM4, a significant eGene in the PM.

ARHGEF3 itself is of intense interest to platelet biology. It has previously been shown that silencing of ARHGEF3 in zebrafish prevents thrombocyte formation [36]. To test whether ARHGEF3 expression had an effect on PM genes, we regressed out ARHGEF3 levels and re-ran the eQTL analysis. Adjusting for ARHGEF3 did not attenuate the trans-associations of rs1354034, suggesting either independence of downstream function for ARHGEF3 and rs1354034 or post-transcriptional modification of ARHGEF3. Previous GWAS studies have shown rs1354034 is associated with platelet count and mean platelet volume [36]; however, perhaps due to power, we found no significant relationship between platelet counts and rs1354034 in YFS. While platelet counts were positively associated with the PM (β = 0.29; P value = 8.23 × 10–30; Additional file 6: Table S5), the association between rs1354034 and the PM was still highly significant when conditioning on platelet counts (β = −0.33; P value = 1.40 × 10–17).

PM displayed diverse metabolic interactions and was associated with 55 metabolite measures, largely comprising of lipoprotein subclasses and fatty acids, as well as CRP (Fig. 3; Additional file 8: Table S7). Cholesterol esters in small HDL particles were most strongly associated with the PM (meta-P value = 9.45 × 10–20). HDL has been shown to exhibit antithrombotic properties by modulating platelet activation and aggregation and the coagulation pathway [37]. Also, various LDL subclasses of lipoproteins were associated with the PM, which is consistent with our understanding that LDL influences platelet activity. For example, LDL has been shown to influence platelet activity either by enhancing platelet responsiveness to aggregating stimuli or by inducing aggregation [38, 39]. Moreover, LDL-specific binding sites on platelets have also been reported [40, 41]. As noted above, the PM was associated with platelet counts, and adjustment for platelet counts in the YFS resulted in attenuation of approximately half of the weakest associations between PM and metabolite measures; however, the strongest were maintained (Additional file 7: Table S6). Association with VLDL particle size and three others were gained following the adjustment (Additional file 7: Table S6).

Neutrophil module

Three loci were identified as mQTLs for the neutrophil module (NM; Fig. 2a and Table 2). The top mQTL was intronic to LRRC8A at 9q34.11 (rs13297295; meta-P value = 3.93 × 10–11; Additional file 4: Figure S5a). LRRC8A encodes a trans-membrane protein shown to play a role in B- and T-cell development and T cell function [42, 43]. Two additional intergenic mQTLs were located at the TAGAP locus at 6q25.3 (rs2485364; meta-P value = 3.93 × 10–9) and at 20q12 (rs140929198; meta-P value = 1.41 × 10–9) (Additional file 4: Figure S5b, c). Rs13297295 was a strong trans regulator of NM and was an eQTL for eight NM genes (ten unique probes), in particular the major alpha defensins (DEFA1-DEFA4), the genes of highest centrality in the module (Fig. 2d; Additional file 9: Table S8). Rs13297295 was a cis-eQTL for another core NM gene, LCN2 (permuted meta-P value = 1 × 10–4) (Fig. 2d; Additional file 9: Table S8). LCN2 is expressed in neutrophils and inducible by TLR activation, acting as an antimicrobial agent via sequestration of bacterial siderophores to prevent iron uptake [4446]. LCN2’s role in acute phase response appears to be related to cardiovascular diseases, such as heart failure [47]. At the TAGAP locus, rs2485364 was a trans-eQTL for eight NM genes (ten probes) and was also a strong driver of LCN2 (meta-P value = 9.11 × 10–17) (Fig. 2d and Additional file 9: Table S8). Consistent with our findings, neutrophils from LCN2-deficient mice have been shown to have impaired chemotaxis and phagocytic capability and increased susceptibility to bacterial and yeast infections compared to wild type [48, 49]. This suggests a possible functional role of TAGAP variants in regulating neutrophil migration through LCN2.

NM was associated with 121 circulating metabolite measures (~76% of all metabolite measures analyzed) as well as CRP (Fig. 3; Additional file 8: Table S7). The strongest is the previously reported association with inflammatory biomarker GlycA (meta-P value = 2.68 × 10–25) [10]; however, NM’s association with various lipoprotein subclasses, particle sizes of lipoproteins, fatty acids, cholesterol, apolipoproteins, glycerides and phospholipids, amino acids, and other small molecules indicates it has a potentially major role in linking neutrophil function to metabolism.

Lipid-leukocyte module

Together with NM, the lipid-leukocyte module (LLM) showed extensive metabolic associations. Overall, 123 metabolite measures and CRP were associated with LLM, with the strongest being the ratio of triglycerides to phosphoglycerides (meta-P value = 5.16 × 10–138; Fig. 3; Additional file 8: Table S7). With the inclusion of the YFS, these findings strongly replicate previous associations between LLM and metabolite measures [14] as well as detecting additional associations. We also confirm the previous strong negative association between CRP and LLM (meta-P value = 8.16 × 10–20). Consistent with previous studies, no mQTLs were detected for LLM.

General immune modules A and B

No mQTLs were associated with general immune modules A and B (GIMA and GIMB); however, these modules were associated with 97 and 82 metabolite measures, respectively (Fig. 3; Additional file 8: Table S7). Cholesterol esters in small HDL and the mean diameter for VLDL particles exhibited the strongest associations with GIMA (meta-P value = 1.56 × 10–30) and GIMB (meta-P value = 1.83 × 10–15), respectively. The GIMA was also associated with omega-3 fatty acid levels (meta-P value = 4.1 × 10–8) and CRP (meta-P value = 5.7 × 10–5) while GIMB was not, perhaps due to the subtly difference pathway enrichments for each module (Table 1). Other metabolite measures associated with these two modules include mainly the VLDL and HDL subclass of lipoproteins and fatty acids; due to their large size and heterogeneous composition, however, interpretation of metabolic relationships of GIMA and GIMB is limited.

Long-term stability of interactions between metabolite measures, immune gene modules, and mQTLs

The 216 individuals in both the DILGOM 2007 and 2014 follow-up allowed investigation of the long-term stability of immunometabolic and mQTL relationships. Across this seven-year period, the eight immune gene coexpression networks were strongly preserved (all preservation statistics’ permutation P values <0.001; Additional file 10: Table S9). The metabolite–metabolite correlation structure was also largely consistent between DIGOM07 and DILGOM14 (Additional file 4: Figure S6).

Next, we examined how metabolite interactions with immune gene modules changed over the 7-year time period (“Methods”). The LLM–metabolite measure associations were the most consistent over time with 90 and 79 metabolite measures reaching significance in DILGOM07 and DILGOM14, respectively, of which 74 were significant at both time points (Fig. 4a; Additional file 11: Table S10). The direction and effect size of LLM–metabolite measure associations were largely maintained (Fig. 4b). For the neutrophil module, the pyruvate association was significantly maintained over time; however, there was some evidence that other expected associations with NM were stable over time, including GlycA (Additional file 11: Table S10). While no associations with metabolite measures were significantly maintained for the platelet module, rs1354034 was a temporally stable mQTL of PM (mQTL P value = 4.87 × 10–7). No other mQTLs reached significance for temporal stability.
Fig. 4

Temporally stable metabolite measure associations with the LLM. a Circular heatmap for association between each metabolite measure and the LLM. b Comparison of the effect size estimates of metabolite measure association with LLM in DILGOM07 and DILGOM14 shows that the overall association patterns are consistent across the two time-points. Colors denote metabolites that are significantly associated with the LLM in DILGOM07 only (orange), DILGOM14 only (blue), and across both time-points (green). The grey dashed line is the x = y line

While we were powered to topologically replicate immune modules between time-points, power to detect module–metabolite associations and mQTLs was still limited, with only the strongest associations reaching significance. For the latter, the effect sizes for module associations were generally consistent between the time points (Additional file 4: Figure S7), with the exception of GIMB. With the particularly strong consistency of associations for the LLM and NM, it may be that smaller modules, which capture more defined transcriptional programs, are the most temporally stable in terms of their phenotype associations. However, given the robustness of these associations between independent cohorts, we anticipate that, as long-term omics follow-up of population-based cohorts increase in sample size, more of these discovered associations will become statistically significant over time.

Conclusions

This study has utilized over 2000 individuals to map the immuno-metabolic crosstalk operating in circulation. We have identified and characterized eight robust immune gene modules, their genetic control, and interactions with diverse metabolite measures, including many of clinical significance (e.g., triglycerides, HDL, LDL, branched-chain amino acids). Also, several significant metabolite measures identified here, particularly branched chain amino acids and fatty acids, have been previously shown to be predictive of cardiovascular events and the development of T2D [6, 50]. Furthermore, our findings are consistent with and build upon those of previous studies. In addition to five newly identified gene modules, their mQTLs and metabolite interactions, we have replicated the previously characterized LL module and confirm its association with lipoprotein subclasses, lipids, fatty acids, and amino acids [13, 14]. Associations between the core genes in the LL module and isoleucine, leucine, and various lipids were also identified independently in the KORA cohort [12]. Importantly, we have shown the long-term stability of LL and neutrophil module coexpression and interactions with metabolite measures, and we have greatly expanded the number of known biomarkers associated with the NM from one (GlycA) to 123 [10]. Our study has also expanded the widespread trans eQTL effects at the ARHGEF3 locus [23], shows them to be strongly maintained within individuals over time, and further identifies extensive interactions with lipoprotein measures that may be a consequence of these trans effects.

Taken together, our analyses illustrate the rapidly growing body of evidence intimately linking the immunoinflammatory response to the blood metabolome. With finer-resolution maps of these interactions, new biomarkers of chronic and acute inflammatory states are likely to emerge. With in vivo and interventional studies, modulation of these metabolite–immune interactions through existing lipid-lowering medications, gut microbe effects, or dietary changes may provide new ways the immune system itself can be utilized to lessen the burden of cardiometabolic disease.

Methods

Study populations

This study used data from two population-based cohorts, the Dietary, Lifestyle, and Genetic determinant of Obesity and Metabolic syndrome (DILGOM; N = 518) and the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study (YFS; N = 1650), which have been described in detail elsewhere [13, 51]. All subjects enrolled in these studies gave written informed consent.

The DILGOM study is a subsample of the FINRISK 2007 cross-sectional population-based survey, which recruited a random sample of 10,000 individuals between 25 and 74 years of age, stratified by sex and 10-year age groups, from five study areas in Finland. All 6258 individuals who participated in the FINRISK 2007 baseline health examination were invited to attend the DILGOM study (N = 5024), 630 of whom underwent at least one of the genotyping, transcriptomics, or metabolomics profiling considered here. In 2014, a follow-up study was conducted, for which 3735 individuals from the original study re-participated. Samples collected in 2007 and 2014 are referred to as DILGOM07 and DILGOM14, respectively.

The YFS is a longitudinal prospective cohort study that started in 1980, with follow-up studies carried out every 3 years, to monitor cardiovascular disease risk factors in children and adolescents from five major regions of Finland (Helsinki, Kuopio, Turku, Oulu, and Tampere). A total of 3596 children and adolescents in age groups 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 years participated in the baseline study; these children were randomly selected from the national public register and their details are described in [51]. In this current study, data collected from the 2011 follow-up study (participants aged 34, 37, 40, 43, 46, and 49 years) were analyzed.

Sample collection

Venous blood was collected following an overnight fast in all three studies. Samples were centrifuged and the resulting plasma and serum samples were aliquoted into separate tubes and stored at −70 °C for analyses. Protocols for the blood sampling, physiological measurements, and clinical survey questions were similar across the YFS and DILGOM studies and are described extensively in [13, 52].

Genotyping and imputation

Whole blood genomic DNA obtained from both cohorts was genotyped using the Illumina 610-Quad SNP array for DILGOM07 (N = 555) [13] and a custom generated 670 K Illumina BeadChip array for YFS (N = 2443) [53]. The 670 K array shares 562,643 SNPs with the 610-quad array. The 670 K array removes poorly performing SNPs from the 610-quad array and improves copy number variation coverage [53]. Genotype calling was performed with the Illuminus clustering algorithm [54]. Quality control was as previously described in [13] and [53] for DILGOM and YFS, respectively. Genotypes were imputed to the 1000 Genomes Phase 1 version 3 reference panel using IMPUTE2 in both DILGOM and YFS [17]. Poorly imputed SNPs based on low call-rate (<0.90 for DILGOM, <0.95 for YFS), low-information score (<0.4), minor allele frequency <1%, and deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P < 5 × 10–6) were then removed. A total of 7,263,701 SNPs in DILGOM and 6,721,082 in YFS passed quality control, with 6,485,973 common between the two. A total of N = 518 samples in DILGOM and N = 2443 samples in YFS individuals passed quality control filters.

Metabolomics profiling

Metabolite concentrations for DILGOM07 (N = 4816), DILGOM14 (N = 1273), and YFS (N = 2046) were quantified from serum samples utilizing a high-throughput NMR metabolomics platform (Brainshake Ltd, Helsinki, Finland) [18, 55]. Details of the experimental protocol, including sample preparation, NMR spectroscopy, and metabolite identification, have been previously described in [13, 18]. A total of 159 metabolite measures were assessed, of which 148 were directly measured and 11 were derived (Additional file 1: Table S1). The 148 measures include the constituents of 14 lipoprotein subclasses (98 measurements total), sizes of three lipoprotein particles, two apolipoproteins, eight fatty acids, eight glycerides and phospholipids, nine cholesterols, nine amino acids, one inflammatory marker, and ten small molecules (involved in glycolysis, citric acid cycle, and urea cycle). The lipoprotein subclasses are classified according to size as follows: chylomicrons and extremely large VLDL particles (average particle diameter at least 75 nm); five VLDL subclasses—very large VLDL (average particle diameter of 64.0 nm), large VLDL (53.6 nm), medium VLDL (44.5 nm), small VLDL (36.8 nm), and very small VLDL (31.3 nm); intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL; 28.6 nm); three LDL subclasses—large LDL (25.5 nm), medium LDL (23.0 nm), and small LDL (18.7 nm); and four HDL subclasses—very large HDL (14.3 nm), large HDL (12.1 nm), medium HDL (10.9 nm), and small HDL (8.7 nm). Measurements with very low concentration, set as zero by the NMR pipeline, were set to the minimum value of that particular metabolite measure. Measurements rejected by automatic quality control or with detected irregularities were treated as missing. Undefined derived ratios arising from measurements with very low concentration (i.e., zero) were also treated as missing. Measurements were log2 transformed to approximate a normal distribution.

CRP, an inflammatory marker, was quantified from serum using a high sensitivity latex turbidimetric immunoassay kit (CRP-UL assay, Wako Chemicals, Neuss, Germany) and an automated analyser (Olympus AU400) in DILGOM07 (N = 5000), DILGOM14 (N = 1308), and YFS (N = 2046). CRP levels were log2 transformed.

Gene expression, processing, and normalization

Transcriptome-wide gene expression levels were quantified by microarrays from peripheral whole blood using similar protocols in all three cohorts, and have been previously described for DILGOM07 [13] and YFS [56]. Stabilized total RNA was obtained from whole blood using a PAXgene Blood RNA System and the protocols recommended by the manufacturer. In DILGOM07, RNA integrity and quantity were evaluated using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. In YFS, RNA integrity and quantity were evaluated spectrophotometrically using an Eppendorf BioPhotomer and the RNA isolation process was validated using an Agilent RNA 6000 Nano Chip Kit. RNA was hybridized to Illumina HT-12 version 3 BeadChip arrays in DILGOM07 and to Illumina HT-12 version 4 BeadChip arrays in DILGOM14 and YFS.

For DILGOM07, data were preprocessed as described in Inouye et al. [13]. Briefly, for each array the background corrected probes were subjected to quantile normalization at the strip-level. Technical replicates were combined by bead count weighted average and replicates with Pearson correlation coefficient <0.94 or Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient <0.60 were removed. Expression values for each probe were then log2 transformed. For YFS, background corrected probes were subjected to quantile normalization followed by log2 transformation. For DILGOM14, probes matching to the erythrocyte globin components (N = 4) and those that hybridized to multiple locations spanning more than 10 kb (N = 507) were removed. Probes with average bead intensity of 0 were treated as missing. The average bead intensity was then log2 transformed and quantile normalized. A total of 35,425 (for DILGOM07), 36,640 (for DILGOM14), and 37,115 (for YFS) probes passed quality control.

Gene co-expression network analysis and replication

Gene co-expression network modules were identified in DILGOM07 (N = 518 individuals with gene expression data) as previously described [10] using WGCNA version 1.47 [57, 58] on all probes passing quality control. Briefly, probe co-expression was calculated as the Spearman correlation coefficient between each pair of probes, adjusted for age and sex. The weighted interaction network was calculated as the element-wise absolute co-expression exponentiated to the power 5. This power was selected through the scale-free topology criterion [57], which acts as a penalization procedure to enhance differentiation of signal from noise. Probes were subsequently clustered hierarchically (average linkage method) by topological overlap dissimilarity [57] and modules were detected through dynamic tree cut of the resulting dendrogram with default parameters and a minimum module size of ten probes [59]. Similar modules were merged together in an iterative process in which modules whose eigengenes clustered together below a height of 0.2 were joined. Module eigengenes, representative summary expression profiles, were calculated as the first eigenvector from a principal components analysis of each module’s expression data.

Module reproducibility and longitudinal stability were assessed in YFS (N = 1650 with gene expression data) and DILGOM14 (N = 333 with gene expression data), respectively, using the NetRep R package version 0.30.1 [19]. Briefly, a permutation test (20,000 permutations) of seven module preservation statistics was performed for each module in YFS and DILGOM14 separately. These statistics test the distinguishability and similarity of network features (density and connectivity) for each module in a second dataset [20]. Modules were considered reproducible where permutation P values for all seven statistics were <0.001 (Bonferroni correcting for 40 modules) in YFS, and modules were considered longitudinally stable where P values were <0.001 for all seven statistics in DILGOM14. Probe co-expression in YFS was calculated as the Spearman correlation coefficient between age- and sex-adjusted expression levels and the weighted interaction network was calculated as the element-wise absolute co-expression exponentiated to the power 4 as previously described [10]. Probe co-expression in DILGOM14 was calculated as the Spearman correlation coefficient between each pair of probes, and the weighted interaction network defined as the element-wise absolute co-expression exponentiated to the power 5.

To filter out genes spuriously clustered into each module by WGCNA, we performed a two-sided permutation test on module membership (Pearson correlation between probe expression and the module eigengene) for each reproducible module in DILGOM07 and YFS. Here, the null hypothesis was, for each module, that its probes did not truly coexpress with the module. The null distribution of module membership for each module was empirically generated by calculating the membership between all non-module genes and the module’s eigengene. P values for each probe were then calculated using the following permutation test P value estimator [60]:
$$ p=\frac{b+1}{\mathrm{v} + 1}-{\displaystyle {\int}_0^{\raisebox{1ex}{$0.5$}\!\left/ \!\raisebox{-1ex}{${v}_t+1$}\right.}F\left(b;\mathrm{v},{v}_t\right)d{v}_t} $$

where b is taken as the number of non-module genes with a membership smaller or greater than the test gene’s module membership, whichever number is smaller; v, the number of permutations calculated, and v t , the total number of possible permutations, are both the number of non-module genes. The resulting P value was multiplied by 2 because the test was two-sided. To adjust for multiple testing, FDR correction was applied to the P values separately for each module using the Benjamini and Hochberg method [61]. We rejected the null hypothesis at FDR adjusted P value <0.05 in both DILGOM07 and YFS, deriving a subset of core probes for each module.

Functional annotation of immune modules

Immune modules were identified through over-representation analysis of Gene Ontology (GO) terms in the core gene set for each of the 20 reproducible modules using the web-based tool GOrilla [21] with default parameters (performed March 2016). GOrilla was run on two unranked gene lists where core module genes were given as the target list and the background list was given as the 25,233 human RefSeq genes corresponding to any probe(s) passing quality control in both DILGOM07 and YFS. A hypergeometric test was calculated to test whether each module was significantly enriched for genes annotated for each GO term in the “biological process” ontology. A GO term was considered significantly over-represented in a module where its FDR corrected P value was <0.05. FDR correction was applied in each module separately. Significant GO terms for each module were further summarized into a subset of representative GO terms with REVIGO [22] using the RELSIM semantic similarity measure and a similarity cut-off value C = 0.5 on genes from Homo sapiens. A module was considered to be immune-linked where the representative GO term list contained the parent GO term GO:0002376 (immune system process) and/or GO:0002682 (regulation of immune system processes). We further performed a literature-based search for genes in the respective modules. Module names, which were assigned based on both GO enrichments and literature-based searches, indicate the likely immune-related processes the modules might be involved in; there’s no implication of exclusivity or that this is the only set of genes involved in that particular process.

Statistical analyses

Reproducible associations between modules and metabolite measures were identified through linear regression of each immune module eigengene on each of the 159 metabolite measures and CRP in both DILGOM07 and YFS. Prior to analysis, metabolite data were first subsetted to individuals with matching gene expression profiles, followed by removal of subjects on cholesterol lowering drugs, for YFS (N = 62) and DILGOM07 (N = 74). Pregnant women in YFS (N = 10) and DILGOM (N = 2) were further removed from the analysis. A total of 440 individuals in DILGOM07 and 1575 individuals in YFS had matched gene expression and metabolite data, excluding pregnant women and those individuals taking lipid-lowering medication. Models were adjusted for age, sex, and use of combined oral contraceptive pills. Module eigengenes and metabolite measures were scaled to standard deviation units. To maximize statistical power, a meta-analysis was performed on the DILGOM07 and YFS associations using the fixed-effects inverse variance method implemented in the “meta” R package (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/meta/index.html). The meta-P values for the 160 metabolite measure associations (including CRP) within each module were FDR corrected using the widely used Benjamini–Hochberg procedure [61]. An association was considered significant at FDR adjusted P value <6.25 × 10–3 (0.05/8 modules). This Bonferroni-adjusted threshold was chosen to further adjust for the multiple modules being tested. To assess the potential confounding effects of blood cell type abundance on module metabolite measure association, the model was rerun in YFS adjusting for leukocyte (for CCLM, VRM, BCM, NM, LLM, GIMA, GIMB) and platelet (for PM) counts available for this cohort. The beta values and P values generated with and without adjusting for cell count were then compared. Additionally, to assess the possible effect of cell counts on expression profiles, cell counts were associated with module eigengenes.

Associations between modules and metabolite measures were tested for longitudinal stability in DILGOM14 using a linear regression model of each immune module eigengene on each of the 159 metabolite measures and CRP. A total of 216 individuals in DILGOM had matched gene expression and metabolite data in both 2007 and 2014, after removing pregnant women and individuals on lipid lowering medication at either time point (N = 70). Models were adjusted for age and sex. Information on use of oral contraceptives was not available for this cohort. It is worth noting that >60% of women were more than 50 years old; hence, we would expect that rates of contraceptive use would be low and therefore not a significant confounder. Module eigengenes and metabolite measures were scaled to standard deviation units. An association was considered longitudinally stable where the association was significant (FDR adjusted P value <6.25 × 10–3) in both DILGOM14 and DILGOM07. For sensitivity analysis, the model in DILGOM07 was run without adjusting for oral contraceptive use and this did not affect the significant associations maintained over the two time-points.

Module quantitative trait loci (mQTLs) were identified through genome-wide association scans with each immune module eigengene using the PLINK2 version 1.90 software (https://www.cog-genomics.org/plink2) [62] in DILGOM07 and YFS. A total of 518 individuals had matched gene expression and genotype data in DILGOM07 and 1400 individuals had matched gene expression and genotype data in YFS. Associations were tested using a linear regression model of each eigengene on the minor allele dosage (additive model) of each SNP. Models were adjusted for age, sex, and the first ten genetic principal components (PCs). Genetic PCs were generated from a linkage-disequilibrium (LD) pruned set of approximately 200,000 SNPs using flashpca [63]. P values for each association in DILGOM07 and YFS were combined in a meta-analysis using the METAL software [64], which implements a sample size weighted Z-score method. A SNP was considered an mQTL if meta-analysis P value (meta-P value) was <5 × 10–8. Blood cell count data available for YFS were utilized to test the robustness of module associations with mQTLs, where the same model was run with and without adjusting for leukocyte and platelet cell counts.

Significant mQTLs were subsequently tested as expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) for genes within their respective modules using Matrix eQTL in both DILGOM07 and YFS [65]. Both cis (mQTL within 1 Mb of a given probe) and trans (mQTL greater than 5 Mb from a given probe or on a different chromosome) associations were tested. Associations were tested using a linear regression model of probe expression on minor allele dosage (additive model) of the mQTL. Models were adjusted for age, sex, and the first ten genetic PCs. For trans-eQTL associations P values in DILGOM07 and YFS were combined in a meta-analysis using the weighted Z-score method and considered significant where the meta-P value <5 × 10–8. For cis-eQTL associations, permutation tests were performed in which gene expression sample labels were shuffled 10,000 times to compute an empirical P value. The permuted model P values and nominal P value were combined across DILGOM and YFS07 in meta-analyses using the weighted Z-score method when computing the permutation test P value. An mQTL was considered a cis-eQTL where the permutation test P value <0.05.

Declarations

Funding

This study was supported by funding from National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) grant APP1062227. MI was supported by an NHMRC and Australian Heart Foundation Career Development Fellowship (no. 1061435). GA was supported by an NHMRC Early Career Fellowship (no. 1090462). APN and SR were supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award. PW was supported by the Academy of Finland (no. 312476 and 312477). VS was supported by the Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research. This study was further supported by the Strategic Research Funding from the University of Oulu, Finland, the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, the Academy of Finland (grant numbers 141136, 269517, 283045, 294834, and 297338), the Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation, the Emil Aaltonen Foundation, the Novo Nordisk Foundation, and the Finnish Diabetes Research Foundation. ER was supported by the Academy of Finland (no. 285902). The Young Finns Study has been financially supported by the Academy of Finland: grants 286284 (T.L.), 134309 (Eye), 126925, 121584, 124282, 129378 (Salve), 117787 (Gendi), and 41071 (Skidi); the Social Insurance Institution of Finland; Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility area of Tampere, Turku and Kuopio University Hospitals (grant X51001); Juho Vainio Foundation; Paavo Nurmi Foundation; Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research; Finnish Cultural Foundation; Tampere Tuberculosis Foundation; Emil Aaltonen Foundation; Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation; Signe and Ane Gyllenberg Foundation; and Diabetes Research Foundation of Finnish Diabetes Association. MJ was supported by the Paulo Foundation, Maud Kuistila Foundation, and Finnish Medical Foundation. The DILGOM study and the National FINRISK study are supported by the Academy of Finland (grant numbers 139 and 635). The quantitative serum NMR metabolomics platform and its development have been supported by the Academy of Finland, TEKES—the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation, the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, and the strategic and infrastructural research funding from the University of Oulu, Finland, as well as by the British Heart Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, and the Medical Research Council, UK. MP is also supported by EU FP7 under grant agreements 313010 (BBMRI-LPC), 305280 (MIMOmics), and HZ2020 633589 (Ageing with Elegans). MAK works in a Unit that is supported by the University of Bristol and UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_1201/1). A.M. and L.M. were supported by EU H2020 grants 692145, the Estonian Research Council Grant IUT20-60, and European Union through the European Regional Development Fund (Project No. 2014-2020.4.01.15-0012 GENTRANSMED).

Availability of data and materials

The study data are available to the scientific community based on a written application to the THL Biobank and Finnish biobank legislation. Instructions for submitting an application are given in the website of the Biobank (https://www.thl.fi/en/web/thl-biobank/for-researchers). The materials used in the study include open source software, cited as appropriate. Other scripts can be requested from the authors directly.

Authors’ contributions

The study was conceived by APN and MI. Materials and data were provided by SCR, ASH, AJ, AJK, PS, AW, LM, AM, SM, PW, JK, ER, MK, MJ, AP, MAK, SR, TL, OR, VS, and MP. Analyses were performed by APN, SCR, SGB, LGF, GA, and MI. The manuscript was drafted by APN and MI with input from all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study, data sharing, and analyses were given ethics approval by the THL Biobank of Finland (#BB2016_60). DILGOM14 re-examination by the Coordinating Ethics Committee of the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District with the decision number 332/13/03/00/2013. YFS ethics approval for the study research protocols was given by the Joint Commission on Ethics of Turku University and Turku University Central Hospital (ETMK 88/180/2010). All subjects have given written informed consent.

Competing interests

AJK, PS, and PW are shareholders and report employment relations for Nightingale Health Ltd, a company offering NMR-based metabolite profiling.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne
(2)
Systems Genomics Lab, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute
(3)
Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne
(4)
School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne
(5)
National Institute for Health and Welfare
(6)
Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, University of Helsinki
(7)
Computational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu
(8)
NMR Metabolomics Laboratory, School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland
(9)
University of Tartu, Estonian Genome Center
(10)
Diabetes and Obesity Research Program, University of Helsinki
(11)
Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu
(12)
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Fimlab Laboratories and Finnish Cardiovascular Research Center-Tampere, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere
(13)
Department of Clinical Physiology, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital
(14)
Department of Medicine, University of Turku and Division of Medicine, Turku University Hospital
(15)
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
(16)
Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital
(17)
Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT
(18)
Psychiatric & Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital
(19)
Computational Medicine, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol
(20)
Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol
(21)
Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki
(22)
Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Turku University Hospital
(23)
Research Centre of Applied and Preventive Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Turku

References

  1. Hotamisligil GS, Shargill NS, Spiegelman BM. Adipose expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha: direct role in obesity-linked insulin resistance. Science. 1993;259(5091):87–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Weisberg SP, Mccann D, Desai M, Rosenbaum M, Leibel RL, Ferrante AW. Obesity is associated with macrophage accumulation. J Clin Investig. 2003;112(12):1796–808.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Maedler K, Sergeev P, Ris F, Oberholzer J, Joller-jemelka HI, Spinas GA, et al. Glucose-induced beta cell production of IL-1 beta contributes to glucotoxicity in human pancreatic islets. J Clin Invest. 2002;110(6):851–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Böni-Schnetzler M, Boller S, Debray S, Bouzakri K, Meier DT, Prazak R, et al. Free fatty acids induce a proinflammatory response in islets via the abundantly expressed interleukin-1 receptor I. Endocrinology. 2009;150(12):5218–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Böni-Schnetzler M, Thorne J, Parnaud G, Marselli L, Ehses JA, Kerr-Conte J, et al. Increased interleukin (IL)-1beta messenger ribonucleic acid expression in beta-cells of individuals with type 2 diabetes and regulation of IL-1beta in human islets by glucose and autostimulation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(10):4065–74.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Würtz P, Havulinna AS, Soininen P, Tynkkynen T, Prieto-Merino D, Tillin T, et al. Metabolite profiling and cardiovascular event risk: a prospective study of 3 population-based cohorts. Circulation. 2015;131(9):774–85.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Hansson G. Inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;21(352):1685–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Kadl A, Meher AK, Sharma PR, Lee MY, Doran AC, Johnstone SR, et al. Identification of a novel macrophage phenotype that develops in response to atherogenic phospholipids via Nrf2. Circ Res. 2010;107(6):737–46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Li Y, Schwabe RF, DeVries-Seimon T, Yao PM, Gerbod-Giannone MC, Tall AR, et al. Free cholesterol-loaded macrophages are an abundant source of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6: model of NF-kappaB- and map kinase-dependent inflammation in advanced atherosclerosis. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(23):21763–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ritchie SC, Würtz P, Nath AP, Abraham G, Havulinna AS, Fearnley LG, et al. The biomarker glycA is associated with chronic inflammation and predicts long-term risk of severe infection. Cell Syst. 2015;1(4):293–301.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Wahl S, Vogt S, Stückler F, Krumsiek J, Bartel J, Kacprowski T, et al. Multi-omic signature of body weight change: results from a population-based cohort study. BMC Med. 2015;13:48.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Bartel J, Krumsiek J, Schramm K, Adamski J, Gieger C, Herder C, et al. The Human blood metabolome-transcriptome interface. PLoS Genet. 2015;11(6):e1005274.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Inouye M, Silander K, Hamalainen E, Salomaa V, Harald K, Jousilahti P, et al. An immune response network associated with blood lipid levels. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(9):e1001113.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Inouye M, Kettunen J, Soininen P, Silander K, Ripatti S, Kumpula LS, et al. Metabonomic, transcriptomic, and genomic variation of a population cohort. Mol Syst Biol. 2010;6:441.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferrara CT, Wang P, Neto EC, Stevens RD, Bain JR, Wenner BR, et al. Genetic networks of liver metabolism revealed by integration of metabolic and transcriptional profiling. PLoS Genet. 2008;4(3):e1000034.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Connor SC, Hansen MK, Corner A, Smith RF, Ryan TE. Integration of metabolomics and transcriptomics data to aid biomarker discovery in type 2 diabetes. Mol Biosyst. 2010;6(5):909–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Howie BN, Donnelly P, Marchini J. A flexible and accurate genotype imputation method for the next generation of genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genet. 2009;5(6):e1000529.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Soininen P, Kangas AJ, Würtz P, Tukiainen T, Tynkkynen T, Laatikainen R, et al. High-throughput serum NMR metabonomics for cost-effective holistic studies on systemic metabolism. Analyst. 2009;134(9):1781–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ritchie SC, Watts S, Fearnley LG, Holt KE, Abraham G, Inouye M. A scalable permutation approach reveals replication and preservation patterns of network modules in large datasets. Cell Syst. 2016;3(1):71–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Langfelder P, Luo R, Oldham MC, Horvath S. Is my network module preserved and reproducible? PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7(1):e1001057.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Eden E, Navon R, Steinfeld I, Lipson D, Yakhini Z. GOrilla: a tool for discovery and visualization of enriched GO terms in ranked gene lists. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10(1):48.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Supek F, Bošnjak M, Škunca N, Šmuc T. REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21800.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Battle A, Mostafavi S, Zhu X, Potash JB, Weissman MM, McCormick C, et al. Characterizing the genetic basis of transcriptome diversity through RNA-sequencing of 922 individuals. Genome Res. 2014;24(650):14–24.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Fritsche K. Fatty acids as modulators of the immune response. Annu Rev Nutr. 2006;26:45–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Berquin IM, Edwards IJ, Chen YQ. Multi-targeted therapy of cancer by omega-3 fatty acids. Cancer Lett. 2008;269(2):363–77.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Xu Q, Ni S, Wu F, Liu F, Ye X, Mougin B, et al. Investigation of variation in gene expression profiling of human blood by extended principle component analysis. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26905.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Mengozzi M, De Filippi C, Transidico P, Biswas P, Cota M, Ghezzi S, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus replication induces monocyte chemotactic protein-1 in human macrophages and U937 promonocytic cells. Blood. 1999;93(6):1851–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gaudreault E, Fiola S, Olivier M, Gosselin J. Epstein-Barr virus induces MCP-1 secretion by human monocytes via TLR2. J Virol. 2007;81(15):8016–24.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Kanda H, Tateya S, Tamori Y, Kotani K, Hiasa K, Kitazawa R, et al. MCP-1 contributes to macrophage infiltration into adipose tissue, insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis in obesity. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(6):1494–505.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Choi UY, Kang JS, Hwang YS, Kim YJ. Oligoadenylate synthase-like (OASL) proteins: dual functions and associations with diseases. Exp Mol Med. 2015;47:e144.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Jouvenet N, Neil SJD, Zhadina M, Zang T, Kratovac Z, Lee Y, et al. Broad-spectrum inhibition of retroviral and filoviral particle release by tetherin. J Virol. 2009;83(4):1837–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sanchez EL, Lagunoff M. Viral activation of cellular metabolism. Virology. 2015;479:609–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hashimoto S, Chiorazzi N, Gregersent PK, Human B. Alternative splicing of CD79a (Ig-alpha/mb-1) and CD79b (Ig-beta/B29) RNA transcripts in human B cells. Mol Immunol. 1995;32(9):651–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Shattil SJ, Newman PJ. Integrins: dynamic scaffolds for adhesion and signaling in platelets. Blood. 2004;104(6):1606–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Shattil SJ, Kashiwagi H, Pampori N. Integrin signaling: the platelet paradigm. Blood. 1998;91(8):2645–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Gieger C, Kühnel B, Radhakrishnan A, Cvejic A, Serbanovic-Canic J, Meacham S, et al. New gene functions in megakaryopoiesis and platelet formation. Nature. 2011;480(7376):201–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. van der Stoep M, Korporaal SJA, Van Eck M. High-density lipoprotein as a modulator of platelet and coagulation responses. Cardiovasc Res. 2014;103(3):362–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. van Willigen G, Goiter G, Akkerman JN. LDLs increase the exposure of fibrinogen binding sites on platelets and secretion of dense granules. Arter Thromb. 1993;14(1):41–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Surya II, Gorter G, Mommersteeg M, Akkerman JW. Enhancement of platelet functions by low density lipoproteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992;1165(1):19–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Pedreño J, de Castellarnau C, Cullaré C, Sánchez J, Gómez-Gerique J, Ordóñez-Llanos J, et al. LDL binding sites on platelets differ from the “classical” receptor of nucleated cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1992;12(11):1353–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Koller E, Koller F, Binder BR. Purification and identification of the lipoprotein-binding proteins from human blood platelet membrane. J Biol Chem. 1989;264(21):12412–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sawada A, Takihara Y, Kim JY, Matsuda-Hashii Y, Tokimasa S, Fujisaki H, et al. A congenital mutation of the novel gene LRRC8 causes agammaglobulinemia in humans. J Clin Invest. 2003;112(11):1707–13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Kumar L, Chou J, Yee CSK, Borzutzky A, Vollmann EH, von Andrian UH, et al. Leucine-rich repeat containing 8A (LRRC8A) is essential for T lymphocyte development and function. J Exp Med. 2014;211(5):929–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Flo TH, Smith KD, Sato S, Rodriguez DJ, Holmes MA, Strong RK, et al. Lipocalin 2 mediates an innate immune response to bacterial infection by sequestrating iron. Nature. 2004;432(7019):917–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Saiga H, Nishimura J, Kuwata H, Okuyama M, Matsumoto S, Sato S, et al. Lipocalin 2-dependent inhibition of mycobacterial growth in alveolar epithelium. J Immunol. 2008;181(12):8521–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Chan YR, Liu JS, Pociask DA, Zheng M, Mietzner TA, Berger T, et al. Lipocalin 2 is required for pulmonary host defense against Klebsiella infection. J Immunol. 2009;182(8):4947–56.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Marques FZ, Prestes PR, Byars SG, Ritchie SC, Würtz P, Patel SK, et al. Experimental and human evidence for Lipocalin-2 (NGAL) in the development of cardiac hypertrophy and failure. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e005971.Google Scholar
  48. Liu Z, Petersen R, Devireddy L. Impaired neutrophil function in 24p3 null mice contributes to enhanced susceptibility to bacterial infections. J Immunol. 2013;190(9):4692–706.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Shashidharamurthy R, MacHiah D, Aitken JD, Putty K, Srinivasan G, Chassaing B, et al. Differential role of lipocalin 2 during immune complex-mediated acute and chronic inflammation in mice. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(4):1064–73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang TJ, Larson MG, Vasan RS, Cheng S, Rhee EP, McCabe E, et al. Metabolite profiles and the risk of developing diabetes. Nat Med. 2011;17(4):448–53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Raitakari OT, Juonala M, Rönnemaa T, Keltikangas-Järvinen L, Räsänen L, Pietikäinen M, et al. Cohort profile: The cardiovascular risk in Young Finns Study. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37(6):1220–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Nuotio J, Oikonen M, Magnussen CG, Jokinen E, Laitinen T, Hutri-Kähönen N, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors in 2011 and secular trends since 2007: the cardiovascular risk in Young Finns Study. Scand J Public Health. 2014;42(7):563–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith EN, Chen W, Kähönen M, Kettunen J, Lehtimäki T, Peltonen L, et al. Longitudinal genome-wide association of cardiovascular disease risk factors in the Bogalusa heart study. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(9):e1001094.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Teo YY, Inouye M, Small KS, Gwilliam R, Deloukas P, Kwiatkowski DP, et al. A genotype calling algorithm for the Illumina BeadArray platform. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(20):2741–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Soininen P, Kangas AJ, Würtz P, Suna T, Ala-Korpela M. Quantitative serum nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomics in cardiovascular epidemiology and genetics. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2015;8(1):192–206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Raitoharju E, Seppälä I, Oksala N, Lyytikäinen LP, Raitakari O, Viikari J, et al. Blood microRNA profile associates with the levels of serum lipids and metabolites associated with glucose metabolism and insulin resistance and pinpoints pathways underlying metabolic syndrome. The cardiovascular risk in Young Finns Study. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2014;391(1–2):41–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang B, Horvath S. A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2005;4:e17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:559.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Langfelder P, Zhang B, Horvath S. Defining clusters from a hierarchical cluster tree: the Dynamic Tree Cut package for R. Bioinformatics. 2008;24(5):719–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Smyth GK, Phipson B. Permutation P-values should never be zero: calculating exact P-values when permutations are randomly drawn. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2010;9:e39.Google Scholar
  61. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1995;57(1):289–300.Google Scholar
  62. Chang CC, Chow CC, Tellier LC, Vattikuti S, Purcell SM, Lee JJ. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience. 2015;4:7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Abraham G, Inouye M. Fast principal component analysis of large-scale genome-wide data. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e93766.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Willer CJ, Li Y, Abecasis GR, Overall P. METAL: fast and efficient meta-analysis of genomewide association scans. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(17):2190–1.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Shabalin AA. Matrix eQTL: Ultra fast eQTL analysis via large matrix operations. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(10):1353–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Hidalgo LG, Einecke G, Allanach K, Halloran PF. The transcriptome of human cytotoxic T cells: Similarities and disparities among allostimulated CD4+ CTL, CD8+ CTL and NK cells. Am J Transplant. 2008;8(3):627–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Zhang X, Wang Q, Shen Y, Song H, Gong Z, Wang L. Compromised natural killer cells in pulmonary embolism. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(7):8244–51.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Wu N, Zhong M, Roncagalli R, Guo H, Zhang Z, Lenoir C, et al. A hematopoietic cell – driven mechanism involving SLAMF6 receptor, SAP adaptors and SHP-1 phosphatase regulates NK cell education. Nat Immunol. 2016;17(4):387–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Serafini N, Vosshenrich CAJ, Di Santo JP. Transcriptional regulation of innate lymphoid cell fate. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15(7):415–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Kaech SM, Cui W. Transcriptional control of effector and memory CD8+ T cell differentiation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12(11):749–61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Chiang YJ, Kole HK, Brown K, Naramura M, Fukuhara S, Hu RJ, et al. Cbl-b regulates the CD28 dependence of T-cell activation. Nature. 2000;403(6766):216–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Au-Yeung BB, Deindl S, Hsu LY, Palacios EH, Levin SE, Kuriyan J, et al. The structure, regulation, and function of ZAP-70. Immunol Rev. 2009;228(1):41–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Maghazachi AA. Role of chemokines in the biology of natural killer cells. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2010;341:37–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Schoggins JW, Rice CM. Interferon-stimulated genes and their antiviral effector functions. Curr Opin Virol. 2012;1(6):519–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Zhou X, Michal JJ, Zhang L, Ding B, Lunney JK, Liu B, et al. Interferon induced IFIT family genes in host antiviral defense. Int J Biol Sci. 2013;9(2):200–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Borden EC, Sen GC, Uze G, Silverman RH, Ransohoff RM, Foster GR, et al. Interferons at age 50: past, current and future impact on biomedicine. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6(12):975–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Cheon H, Holvey-Bates EG, Schoggins JW, Forster S, Hertzog P, Imanaka N, et al. IFNβ-dependent increases in STAT1, STAT2, and IRF9 mediate resistance to viruses and DNA damage. EMBO J. 2013;32(20):2751–63.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  78. Tedder TF, Tuscano J, Sato S, Kehrl JH. CD22, a B lymphocyte-specific adhesion molecule that regulates antigen receptor signaling. Annu Rev Immunol. 1997;15:481–504.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Ferrer G, Hodgson K, Montserrat E, Moreno C. B cell activator factor and a proliferation-inducing ligand at the cross-road of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and autoimmunity. Leuk Lymphoma. 2009;50(7):1075–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Klein U, Dalla-Favera R. Germinal centres: role in B-cell physiology and malignancy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(1):22–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Wiede F, Fromm PD, Comerford I, Kara E, Bannan J, Schuh W, et al. CCR6 is transiently upregulated on B cells after activation and modulates the germinal center reaction in the mouse. Immunol Cell Biol. 2013;91(5):335–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Breloer M, Kretschmer B, Lüthje K, Ehrlich S, Ritter U, Bickert T, et al. CD83 is a regulator of murine B cell function in vivo. Eur J Immunol. 2007;37(3):634–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Poluektov YO, Kim A, Sadegh-Nasseri S. HLA-DO and its role in MHC class II antigen presentation. Front Immunol. 2013;4:260.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  84. Stegner D, Nieswandt B. Platelet receptor signaling in thrombus formation. J Mol Med. 2011;89(2):109–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Protty MB, Watkins NA, Colombo D, Thomas SG, Heath VL, Herbert JMJ, et al. Identification of Tspan9 as a novel platelet tetraspanin and the collagen receptor GPVI as a component of tetraspanin microdomains. Biochem J. 2009;417(1):391–400.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Kato K, Martinez C, Russell S, Nurden P, Nurden A, Fiering S, et al. Genetic deletion of mouse platelet glycoprotein Ibbeta produces a Bernard-Soulier phenotype with increased alpha-granule size. Blood. 2004;104(8):2339–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Ganz T. Angiogenin: an antimicrobial ribonuclease. Nat Immunol. 2003;4(3):213–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Ganz T. Defensins: antimicrobial peptides of innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3(9):710–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Levy O. A neutrophil-derived anti-infective molecule: bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44(11):2925–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Xu X, Su S, Wang X, Barnes V, De Miguel C, Ownby D, et al. Obesity is associated with more activated neutrophils in African American male youth. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015;39(1):26–32.Google Scholar
  91. Kuroki M, Abe H, Imakiirei T, Liao S, Uchida H, Yamauchi Y, et al. Identification and comparison of residues critical for cell-adhesion activities of two neutrophil CD66 antigens, CEACAM6 and CEACAM8. J Leukoc Biol. 2001;70(4):543–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Wu Z, Sawamura T, Kurdowska AK, Ji HL, Idell S, Fu J. LOX-1 deletion improves neutrophil responses, enhances bacterial clearance, and reduces lung injury in a murine polymicrobial sepsis model. Infect Immun. 2011;79(7):2865–70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  93. Alalwani SM, Sierigk J, Herr C, Pinkenburg O, Gallo R, Vogelmeier C, et al. The antimicrobial peptide LL-37 modulates the inflammatory and host defense response of human neutrophils. Eur J Immunol. 2010;40(4):1118–26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  94. Cruse G, Kaur D, Leyland M, Bradding P. A novel FcepsilonRIbeta-chain truncation regulates human mast cell proliferation and survival. FASEB J. 2010;24(10):4047–57.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  95. Kraft S, Kinet JP. New developments in FcepsilonRI regulation, function and inhibition. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7(5):365–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement