Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more
Open Access

The genome landscape of indigenous African cattle

  • Jaemin Kim1,
  • Olivier Hanotte2, 3,
  • Okeyo Ally Mwai4,
  • Tadelle Dessie3,
  • Salim Bashir5,
  • Boubacar Diallo6,
  • Morris Agaba7,
  • Kwondo Kim1, 8,
  • Woori Kwak1,
  • Samsun Sung1,
  • Minseok Seo1,
  • Hyeonsoo Jeong9,
  • Taehyung Kwon10,
  • Mengistie Taye10, 11,
  • Ki-Duk Song12, 18,
  • Dajeong Lim13,
  • Seoae Cho1,
  • Hyun-Jeong Lee8, 14,
  • Duhak Yoon15,
  • Sung Jong Oh16,
  • Stephen Kemp4, 17,
  • Hak-Kyo Lee12, 18Email author and
  • Heebal Kim1, 10, 19Email authorView ORCID ID profile
Contributed equally
Genome Biology201718:34

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1153-y

Received: 5 October 2016

Accepted: 11 January 2017

Published: 20 February 2017

Abstract

Background

The history of African indigenous cattle and their adaptation to environmental and human selection pressure is at the root of their remarkable diversity. Characterization of this diversity is an essential step towards understanding the genomic basis of productivity and adaptation to survival under African farming systems.

Results

We analyze patterns of African cattle genetic variation by sequencing 48 genomes from five indigenous populations and comparing them to the genomes of 53 commercial taurine breeds. We find the highest genetic diversity among African zebu and sanga cattle. Our search for genomic regions under selection reveals signatures of selection for environmental adaptive traits. In particular, we identify signatures of selection including genes and/or pathways controlling anemia and feeding behavior in the trypanotolerant N’Dama, coat color and horn development in Ankole, and heat tolerance and tick resistance across African cattle especially in zebu breeds.

Conclusions

Our findings unravel at the genome-wide level, the unique adaptive diversity of African cattle while emphasizing the opportunities for sustainable improvement of livestock productivity on the continent.

Keywords

African cattleGenomeAdaptationDiversity

Background

Cattle are central to the African economy and society. The so-called “African Cattle Complex” refers to their role as walking larder, as a source of traction and manure, as well as to their societal importance, including during marriage, birth, death, and/or initiation ceremonies, and their representation of power, prestige, and status [13].

The earliest cattle of Africa were of taurine Bos taurus type. Subsequent waves of migrations of humped zebu B. indicus animals then reshaped the genomic landscape of African cattle [46]. Today, the African continent is uniquely rich in cattle diversity with around 150 African cattle breeds or populations recognized [7, 8]. These are grouped according to their phenotypes into taurine, zebu, and the ancient stabilized taurine × zebu crossbreed known as sanga [6]. Importantly, it is now well established that African cattle carry a taurine maternal ancestry originating from the Near East taurine domestication center(s), while the possible genetic contribution of the now extinct African auroch B. primigenius opisthonomous remains unclear [9, 10]. The pattern of introgression of the zebu genome across the South, East, and the North-Western part of sub-Saharan Africa has been well-documented using autosomal and Y-specific microsatellite loci [46].

African cattle inhabit more than five distinct agro-ecological zones [11]. Overall, zebu cattle are common in the arid and semi-arid northern Sahelo-Sudanian zone as well as on the eastern part of the continent including the highlands; whereas taurine cattle today form the majority of the herds in the sub-humid and humid regions of West Africa, which are heavily infested with the vector of African trypanosomes, the tsetse fly [11]. Sanga cattle are predominantly found in the western region of central Africa around the Great Lakes region and on the southern part of the continent [11] (Fig. 1a). African cattle populations have been subjected to strong environmental pressures including hot, dry, or humid tropical climate conditions and heavy and diverse disease challenges. Accordingly, they are expected to display unique adaptive traits. This is exemplified by the trypanotolerance traits of the N’Dama and other West African taurine breeds inhabiting the tsetse-infested areas [12]. African cattle have also been shaped by human selection for traits such as coat color and horn size [8]. Although, their productivity is much lower than that typically achieved by commercial breeds under the intensive production systems [11], indigenous cattle are often the only option available for millions of farmers in the African agro-pastoral systems, where exotic improved breeds under-perform in the traditional management systems [13].
Fig. 1

a Geographic locations of African cattle populations. b Nucleotide genome diversity. Number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) identified in each breed (left y-axis) with respect to the reference genome (UMD 3.1). Lower bars represent the number of breed-specific SNPs (right y-axis)

With an extended geographic distribution across agro-ecological zones and production systems, African cattle populations represent a unique genetic resource for the understanding of the role of natural and artificial selection in the shaping of the functional diversity of a ruminant species. Moreover, unraveling their genome diversity may provide new insights into the genetic mechanisms underlying their adaptation to various agro-ecosystems [14].

In this publication, we report for the first time the genome characterization of five indigenous African cattle breeds which are representatives of the cattle diversity of the continent: N’Dama, which belong a group of West African taurine with tolerances to multiple infectious diseases; Ankole, which represents African sanga the intermediate crossbreed between zebu and taurine cattle populations, with large and distinctive horns and coat color selected by human; Boran and Kenana, two East African zebu, with beef and dairy characteristics, respectively; Ogaden, an East African zebu living in a hot and dry environment.

The comparative genome-wide analysis with three European and one Asian commercial cattle breed across African cattle types allows us to identify the unique genome response of African cattle breed to tropical challenges.

Results and discussion

Sequencing, assembly, and identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms

Individual genomes of 48 indigenous African (Boran, Ogaden, Kenana, Ankole, and N’Dama) cattle were generated to ~11 X coverage each and were jointly genotyped with publicly available genomes of commercial cattle breeds (Angus, Jersey, Holstein, and Hanwoo) (Fig. 1a, Additional file 1: Note S1, Table S1). These breeds comprise Bos indicus (Boran, Ogaden, and Kenana), African Bos taurus (N’Dama), European-Asian Bos taurus, and sanga (Ankole, cross between taurine and zebu) [8]. In total, 6.50 billion reads or ~644 Gbp of sequences were generated. Using Bowtie 2 [15], reads were aligned to the taurine reference genome sequence UMD 3.1 with an average alignment rate of 98.84% that covered 98.56% of the reference genome (Additional file 1: Table S2). Concordant with previous analysis of zebu Nellore [16], overall alignment rate of the African B. indicus samples to the reference genome UMD 3.1 was found comparable to the one obtained for the African taurine samples (Additional file 1: Table S2). After filtering the potential PCR duplicates and correcting for misalignments due to the presence of INDELs, we detected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using GATK 3.1 [17]. Several filtering steps to minimize the number of false-positive calls were applied before using candidate SNPs in further analyses. In particular, SNPs were removed based on the following criteria: phred-scaled quality score, mapping quality, quality depth and phred scaled P value (see “Methods”). A total of ~37 million SNPs were finally retained and breed-specific SNPs were identified using SnpSift [18] (Fig. 1b, Additional file 1: Table S3). The genomic DNA from 45 African samples were additionally genotyped using the BovineSNP50 Genotyping BeadChip (Illumina, Inc.) to evaluate the accuracy of the SNP calling from the resequencing data. We observed ~95% overall genotype concordance, between the BovineSNP50 Genotyping BeadChip SNPs and the re-sequencing results across the samples, providing confidence on the accuracy of SNP calling (Additional file 1: Table S4).

African genome diversity and relationships

Single nucleotide polymorphisms

Figure 1b illustrates the number of SNPs present in each breed, including breed-specific ones, with numbers provided at Additional file 1: Table S5. Looking at different cattle lineages, the largest number of SNPs is found in the zebu cattle (Boran, Kenana, Ogaden), where the great majority of the SNPs are homozygous across the three breeds representing candidate African zebu lineage specific variants. Most (65.13%) of the SNPs were present in intergenic regions. The remaining SNPs were located upstream (3.90%) and downstream (3.96%) of open reading frame, in introns (26.0%), and untranslated regions (UTRs, 0.240%). Exons contained 0.69% of the total SNPs with 115,439 missense and 1336 nonsense mutations (Additional file 1: Table S5).

Nucleotide diversity measures the degree of polymorphism within a population and it is defined as the average number of nucleotide differences per site between any two DNA sequences chosen randomly from the sample population [19]. On a genome-wide window scale of 10 Mb, the commercial European breeds show reduced levels of nucleotide diversity compared to all indigenous African breeds (Fig. 2d). Here, the reduced level of nucleotide diversity at the whole-genome level is expected and is likely the result of intensive artificial selection over generations and/or genetic drift followed by a demographic history characterized by a low effective population size. Interestingly, N’Dama also show relatively low genetic diversity, perhaps a legacy of an initial low effective population size and/or of population bottleneck following disease challenges [20]. Nucleotide diversity is the highest across the African zebu (Boran, Ogaden, Kenana) and the Ankole sanga. These are admixed taurine × zebu breeds with a relatively large effective population size. The relatively high nucleotide diversity in the commercial Hanwoo may reflect weaker, targeted, and shorter selection history compared to other commercial breeds [21].
Fig. 2

Population structure and relationships of African in comparison to commercial cattle. a Principal component (PC) analysis, PC 1 against PC 2. b Proportion of ancestry for each individual assuming different number of ancestral population (K = 2, 3, and 4). Colors in each vertical line represent the likelihood proportion of an animal genome assigned to a source population. c Neighbor-joining tree of the relationships between the nine cattle breeds (101 animals). The scale bar represents the identity-by-state (IBS) score between pairs of animals. d Genome-wide distribution of nucleotide diversity in 50-kb non-overlapping window

Population structure and relationships

We performed principal component analysis (PCA) of the autosomal SNPs genotype data (Fig. 2a) using EIGENSTRAT [22]. The analysis ignores breed membership but nevertheless reveals clear breed structures as samples from the same breed cluster together. The first two PCs, explaining 16.0% and 3.4% of the total variation, respectively, separate African from non-African breeds with the Ankole cattle at an intermediate position. PCA based on African, commercial, and taurine samples separately (Additional file 1: Figure S1) show no evidence of admixture between breeds or the presence of outlier animals within breeds.

To further understand the degree of admixture in the populations, we used STRUCTURE [23, 24] on a randomly sampled subset of SNPs (~20,000 SNPs). We increased K from 1 to 9, where K is the assumed number of ancestral populations (Fig. 2b and Additional file 1: Figure S2). The analysis suggested K = 2 as the most likely number of genetically distinct groups within our samples (Fig. 2b), reflecting the divergence of taurine and zebu cattle in the cattle population. At K = 3, Ankole showed clear evidence of genetic heterogeneity with shared genome ancestry with African (N’Dama), Asian zebu, and commercial (Holstein, Jersey, Angus, Hanwoo) taurine genetic background. Increasing values of K indicated higher levels of breed homogeneity in the commercial population compared to African zebu breeds. In addition, a neighbor-joining tree (Fig. 2c) separates each breed in its own separate clade. European breeds cluster together, then with the Hanwoo and the N’Dama. Similarly, all the African zebu breeds cluster together and Ankole animals are found at an intermediate position between zebu and N’Dama.

Demographic history and migration events

Variation of effective population size through time [25] is shown in Fig. 3a and Additional file 1: Figure S3. N’Dama seemed to have suffered a stronger population decline compared to the other African populations. This observation is compatible with an initial population bottleneck following the arrival and adaptation of the ancestral population in the tropical sub-humid and humid Western African environment. These West African cattle populations have been subjected in recent times to new environmental pressures imposing strong adaptive constraints (e.g. new pathogens including parasites) [26, 27]. In addition, the estimates of Ogaden and Kenana show a slight increase in population size around 1000 years ago corresponding to the time of the first wave of zebu arrival through the Horn of the continent [8]. All share a common population decline starting approximately 10,000 BP, a likely consequence of Neolithic domestication events [25, 28].
Fig. 3

African cattle effective population size and history. a Estimated effective population size of each African cattle breed and the combined commercial (Hanwoo + Jersey + Holstein + Angus). b Pattern of population splits and mixture between the nine cattle breeds. The drift parameter is proportional to Ne generations, where Ne is the effective population size. Scale bar shows ten times the average standard error of the estimated entries in the sample covariance matrix. The migration edge from the European taurine lineage into the Ankole is colored according to the percent ancestry received from the donor population

We then reconstructed the maximum likelihood tree (Fig. 3b) and residual matrix (Additional file 1: Figure S4) of the nine breeds using Treemix [29] to address population history relationships and to identify pairs of populations that are related to each other independent of that captured by this tree. Adding sequentially migration events to the tree, we found that one inferred migration edge produces a tree with the smallest residuals and thus best fits the data (Additional file 1: Figure S4). We observed a statistically significant migration edge (P < 2.2E-308) with the estimated weight of 11.4%; this edge provides evidence for the gene flow from European B. taurus (represented here by Jersey, Holstein, and Angus) into Ankole. In recent years, Ankole cattle have been increasingly crossbred with taurine breed including Holstein cattle which were first introduced to Uganda 50 years ago [30].

The adaptation of African cattle to environmental stresses and human selection

We compared the genomes of African cattle breeds to identify within each breed signatures of positive selection following environmental and human selection pressures. In contrast to SNP chip data, where diversity is overestimated in taurine lineages and underestimates in indicine lineages [31], whole-genome sequencing can overcome this limit of ascertainment bias to properly enable population analyses of both populations and to identify targets of selections in African B. indicus as well. In particular, we examined extreme haplotype homozygosity and allele frequency differentiation over extended linked regions using cross-population extended haplotype homozygosity (XP-EHH) [32] and the cross-population composite likelihood ratio (XP-CLR) [33]. Considering the close genetic distance among African B. indicus (Additional file 1: Table S6), N’Dama and Ankole cattle breeds were separately compared against all other African breeds for the identification of African breed-specific signatures. XP-EHH maintains power with small sample size (as low as ten samples) [34]. In addition, when estimates of genetic distance (F ST ) between pairs of populations are greater than or close to 0.05, as in our analyses (Additional file 1: Table S6), fewer than 20 individuals per population should be sufficient for population differentiation analysis [35]. To enable comparisons of genomic regions across populations, we divided the genome into non-overlapping segments of 50 Kb [36]. Outlier regions (the top 0.5% XP-EHH or XP-CLR statistics) were considered to be breed-specific candidate regions for further analysis (haplotypes and polymorphisms). The distributions of raw XP-EHH and XP-CLR values of each comparison and SNP density in each non-overlapping 50-kb window are provided in Additional file 1: Figures S5–S7.

The adaptation of N'Dama to trypanosome challenge

We first investigated how tolerance to trypanosome challenge may have impacted the genome of African cattle. African trypanosomes are extracellular protozoan parasite that cause severe diseases in human (sleeping sickness) and domestic animals (nagana); approximately 60 million people and 50 million cattle are living at risk of trypanosome infection [37, 38]. Among a few “trypanotolerant” indigenous African cattle breeds, the West African N’Dama is the best characterized, while the “newcomer” B. indicus are generally highly susceptible to trypanosomosis [39]. We therefore compared the N’Dama genome against all other African cattle breeds.

Outlier windows from XP-EHH and XP-CLR analysis include 124 and 106 genes, respectively, 28 of which were common to both analyses (Table 1, Additional files 2 and 3). This relatively modest overlap likely resulted from difference in power between the tests designed to detect regions affected by complete (XP-EHH) or incomplete selective sweeps (XP-CLR).
Table 1

Summary of major candidate regions identified from XP-EHH and XP-CLR in each breed comparison (see Additional files 2 and 3 for summary values of all candidate genes)

Gene

CHRa

Max XP-EHHb

XP-EHH P valuec

XP-CLR

Association

Candidate SNP position

Selected breed

HCRTR1

2

-

-

597.3

Circadian rhythm, feeding behavior

 

N’Dama

STOM

8

-

-

525.0

Anemia

112665146

(p.Met48Val)

N’Dama

SLC40A1

2

3.32

0.0002

831.1

Anemia

-

N’Dama

SBDS

25

2.91

0.0024

-

Anemia

-

N’Dama

EPB42

10

-

-

511.1

Anemia

38523031

(p.Arg503His)

N’Dama

RPS26

6

-

-

562.8

Anemia

-

N’Dama

KIT

6

1.80

0.0050

-

Coat color

-

Ankole

MITF

22

1.90

0.0032

-

Coat color

-

Ankole

PDGFRA

6

2.56

0.0001

319.3

Coat color

-

Ankole

FGF18

20

-

-

182.3

Horn development

-

Ankole

MC1R

18

-

-

295.0

Coat color

 

Ankole

SOD1

1

-

-

333.31

Thermoregulation

3116044

(p.Ile95Phe)

B. indicus

-

-

186.33

African

PRLH

3

1.49

0.0014

-

Thermoregulation

117646610

(p.Arg76His)

B. indicus

1.17

0.0039

-

African

BOLA

23

1.19

0.003

110.13

Tick resistance

-

African

Dash (–) indicates non-significant results

aChromosome

bMaximum (positive) XP-EHH score of all SNPs within a window

cRank-based empirical P value of genomic region

Among these, we found HCRTR1 (XP-CLR = 597.3) encoding hypocretin receptor A (Fig. 4), which belongs to the class I subfamily within the superfamily of G-coupled receptors and is coupled to Ca2+ mobilization. Hypocretins are produced by a small group of neurons in the lateral hypothalamic and perifornical areas and they are involved in the control of mammalian feeding behavior [40]. Compared to other African cattle, N’Dama show almost pure haplotype homozygosity at the HCRTR1 region and we also detect seven non-synonymous variants in the gene (Fig. 4b) (Additional file 1: Table S7). Numerous studies indicate that polymorphism within hypocretin genes are associated with alterations in feeding and drinking behaviors [41, 42]. In particular, orexin-A, endogenous ligands for G protein coupled receptor, stimulated food consumption, and orexin messenger RNA is upregulated by fasting [43]. These independent studies indicate that the hypocretins have a major role in the regulation of feeding. It may explain the superior ability of N’Dama to maintain body weight and resist listlessness and emaciation following trypanosome infection [44, 45].
Fig. 4

Signatures of selective sweep at the N’Dama HCRTR1, SLC40A1, EPB42, and STOM gene regions. Nucleotide diversity plots of the HCRTR1 (a) and SLC40A1 (c) genomic regions. Haplotype diversity at the HCRTR1 (b) and SLC40A1 (d) gene regions (gray area). The major allele at each SNP position in N’Dama is colored in red, the minor one in white. The star (*) denotes non-synonymous N’Dama SNP identified at the HCRTR1 gene region. e Frequency of N’Dama fixed haplotype (SLC40A1 region) in others breeds with comparison with major observed haplotype(s) (frequency > 0.15 shown). Nucleotide with green background represents distinct polymorphism compared to the major SNP allele present in N’Dama. f, g Structure of the EPB42 and STOM gene with exons indicated by vertical bars. Non-synonymous SNPs represent p.Arg503His and p.Met48Val and are highlighted in yellow. Different color represents different alleles, and frequency of each haplotype is indicated on the right side of the figure

N’Dama cattle achieve trypanotolerance with at least two additional characteristics: the ability to resist anemia and to control parasite proliferation [4648]. Anemia is the most prominent and consistent clinical sign of Trypanosoma infection and it is the main indicator for treatment [49]. We found five genes within genome regions putatively positively selected (outlier windows) that are associated with anemia (SLC40A1, STOM, SBDS, EPB42, and RPS26). The iron exporter SLC40A1 (XP-EHH = 3.32, XP-CLR = 831.1) is essential for iron homeostasis and it is therefore related to iron-deficiency anemia [50]. This gene shows a local reduction in nucleotide diversity and extended haplotype pattern (Fig. 4c). Notably, we found a fixed SLC40A1 haplotype in N’Dama, with frequency of 24% and 58% in other African cattle and commercial breeds, respectively, strongly supporting selection at the gene (Fig. 4d, e). Stomatin (STOM, XP-CLR = 525.0) is a gene named after a rare human hemolytic anemia [51], and it encodes a 31-kDa integral membrane protein. Mutations in SBDS (XP-EHH = 2.91) EPB42 (XP-CLR = 511.1) genes are responsible for hypochromic anemia [52] and hereditary hemolytic anemia [53], respectively, while mutations at RPS26 (XP-CLR = 562.8) gene have been identified in Diamond-Blackfan anemia patients [5456].

We further screened these candidate genes for non-synonymous mutations representing putative functional variants. Notably, missense SNPs changed amino acids in the STOM (p.Met48Val) and EPB42 (p.Arg503His) proteins. Both of these allele variants are completely fixed in N’Dama cattle in contrast to all the other breeds (Fig. 4f and g).

Genes positively selected in N’Dama were significantly (P < 0.05) over-represented in “I-kappaB kinase/NF-kappaB cascade” (GO:0007249, Additional file 4). The transcription factor nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kB) is central to the innate and acquired immune response to microbial pathogens, coordinating cellular responses to the presence of infection. In fact, based on the molecular evidence that Trypanosoma cruzi activates NF-kB in a number of cells, NF-kB was suggested as a determinant of the intracellular survival and tissue tropism of T. cruzi, which causes human sleeping sickness [57]. These studies may suggest that genes involved in NF-kB cascade have experienced positive selection in N’Dama to alter in functions to effectively regulate the infection of cattle trypanosome. We also found a significant signal at interleukin 1 receptor-like 2 (IL1RL2) in agreement with the observation that the initial response of the host immune system to trypanosomes infection includes activation of macrophages secreting pro-inflammatory molecules such as IL-1 [58, 59]. In particular, it has been previously reported that T. brucei infections result in increase of IL-1 secretion [60].

The impact of human selection on Ankole genome

In the Ankole versus all other African cattle comparisons, we identified 187 genes within the outlier genome windows (Table 1, Additional files 2 and 3). The putatively selected genomic regions include candidate loci that have biological functions related to coat color: melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) (XP-CLR = 295.0) and KIT (XP-EHH = 1.80), both of which are supported by haplotype sharing analysis showing high level of haplotype homozygosity within the breed (Additional file 1: Figure S8). Ankole cattle are characterized by their massive white horns and predominantly red coat color [61]. The results are in agreement with previous reports that mutations in MC1R generate red (or chestnut) coat colors in various species including cattle, horses, mice, and dogs [62, 63]. The product of KIT is likely involved in the white spotting of the coat, not only in cattle but also in other domesticated mammals [64]. Our findings are consistent with the observation that while the coat color of Ankole is predominantly red, it is also sometimes white-spotted [61]. Interestingly, Holstein, also known for their black-and-white markings, share the same haplotype (Additional file 1: Figure S8) in the KIT gene region as the one observed in Ankole, indicating a common origin of the haplotype in the African and European taurine lineages and/or recent crossbreeding of Ankole with Holstein cattle. We also found MITF (XP-EHH = 1.90) and PDGFRA (XP-EHH = 2.56, XP-CLR = 319.3) genes within the outlier regions; these were previously also associated with white spotting in various dairy cattle breeds and other species [6567] (Table 1, Additional files 2 and 3).

We also found putative candidate selected regions that might have shaped the massive horn in Ankole. We initially evaluated a previously reported candidate variant responsible for the presence of horns in Holstein [68]. All Ankole samples showed the genotype G/G at BTA1:1390292G > A indicating that Ankole followed the genotype of horned Holstein cattle [68]. Over-representation analysis of gene ontology (GO) terms (Additional file 4) shows that Ankole has increased GO categories involved in fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling pathway (MAP3K5, PPP2R2C, FGF18, and FRS3, P00021) and skeletal system development ACVRL1, CASR, TLX3, ACVR1B, and RUNX3, GO:0001501). Neither term was enriched from positively selected genes in any other African cattle, indicating they may therefore be linked to the extreme horn development observed in the breed. Horn is an outgrowth of the frontal bone covered by a tough shell of modified epithelium, derived from dermal and subcutaneous connective tissue [69, 70]. FGF signaling pathway includes FGF18 (XP-CLR = 182.3), which is responsible for differentiating osteoblasts during calvarial bone development [71] and is associated with chondrocyte proliferation [72] in mouse. These genes together might underlie the distinctive morphology of Ankole horn versus other cattle.

The adaptation of African cattle to tick challenges

African cattle breeds have evolved to adapt to the harsh environmental conditions prevailing across sub-Saharan Africa such as tropical livestock diseases, high solar radiation and temperature, drought, and poor nutritional condition [73, 74]. These environmental conditions prevail across sub-Saharan Africa and a signal of positive selection may be expected to be common across African breeds. To investigate this, all African breeds were combined and compared to the commercial breeds for the identification of common and unique African genome specific signature of selection. In this comparison, XP-CLR and XP-EHH analyses reveal outlying windows (top 0.5%) with 252 genes (Additional files 2 and 3). Among these, we found the region including the bovine lymphocyte antigen (BOLA, XP-EHH = 1.19, XP-CLR = 110.1) gene. Examining the region in details we identified six BOLA haplotype blocks where major African cattle haplotypes correspond to contrasting or the minor haplotypes in commercial cattle (Additional file 1: Figure S9). Alleles of BOLA-DRB3 showed association with resistance to tick (Boophilus microplus) infestation in cattle [75]. The bovine lymphocyte antigen complex has been studied extensively for the past 30 years because of its importance in host immunity [76]. Most studies have focused on other BOLA family members and their relevance to parasitic diseases and thus elucidating the function of this BOLA gene in African cattle may unravel the mechanisms behind the interaction between BOLA complex and the innate immunity against several important tropical parasitic diseases such as East Coast Fever [77].

Heat tolerance in African cattle

To identify genomic regions responsible for thermoregulation in African cattle, we selected a priori candidate genes by using 13 previously identified heat tolerance quantitative trait loci (QTL) regions [78] and 18 heat shock proteins. None of these regions were supported by our common metrics of XP-EHH and XP-CLR. We then analyzed the pattern of haplotype homozygosity in African cattle compared to the European and Asian taurine (commercial breeds developed in temperate areas). Consistent with our previous results, we found haplotype sharing to be much more extensive in the commercial breeds when random genomic regions were examined (Additional file 1: Figure S10). However, looking at the candidate regions in African breeds in comparison to the commercial ones, remarkable long-range haplotypes are shared across African cattle within one of the heat tolerance QTLs (BTA22, 10.03–11.0 Mb) (Fig. 5a) and in one of heat shock proteins, heat shock 70 kDa protein 4 (HSPA4) (Additional file 1: Figure S11), indicative of selective sweeps for heat tolerance in this region. Cellular tolerance to heat stress is mediated by a family of heat shock proteins. Heat shock protein 70 is notable for promoting cell protection against heat damage and preventing protein denaturation [79, 80]. The degree of haplotype sharing at these two regions was noted to be more extensive in B. indicus African cattle than in the N’Dama, which is consistent with a previous report that zebu breeds are better able to regulate body temperature in response to heat stress [81]. The heat tolerance QTL region identified here is further supported by multiple signatures of positive selection within B. indicus populations showing elevated linkage-disequilibrium and high population divergence (Fst) compared to the taurine breeds (Fig. 5a).
Fig. 5

A selective sweep associated with heat tolerance in African cattle. a Fixation index (Fst) and linkage disequilibrium values for Bos indicus samples in 20-kb sliding windows with 5-kb steps (top) and the degree of haplotype sharing around heat tolerance QTL (10.71–10.90 Mb region on chromosome 22). Fst is calculated between B. indicus and commercial samples. The major allele in each B. taurus and B. indicus populations is indicated in red. b Structure of the SOD1 gene with exons indicated by vertical bars. A non-synonymous SNP represents p.Ile95Phe and is highlighted in yellow. Haplotype frequencies are indicated by numbers next to each haplotype. In each haplotype, green and beige bars represent alleles 1 and 2, respectively

We also found a strong signal for positive selection at the superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1, XP-CLR = 333.3) gene (Additional file 3) in both African versus commercial breeds and B. indicus versus commercial breeds comparisons. Okado-Matsumoto and Fridovich [82] have shown that binding of heat shock proteins to mutant forms of protein abundant in motor neurons, such as SOD1, makes heat shock proteins unavailable for their antiapoptotic functions. Considering that B. indicus cattle are better adapted to higher ambient temperature, and the selection signal was stronger in B. indicus, further comparisons were made between B. indicus and commercial breeds only. Functional annotation of variants located in this gene identified a missense mutation (p.Ile95Phe) in exon 3 of SOD1 only in B. indicus population. This non-synonymous mutation, in contrast to the pattern observed in commercial breeds, has nearly reached fixation (95%) in the zebu populations (Fig. 5b). These results suggest that variations in SOD1 gene may play an important role in heat tolerance traits observed African cattle.

A recent study has expanded the scope of classical prolactin biology [83]. It shows that the prolactin signaling pathway is involved not only in lactation but also has an impact on hair morphology and thermoregulation phenotypes in the predominantly taurine Senepol cattle. This is most likely mediated by two reciprocal mutations in the prolactin (PRL) and its receptor (PRLR) genes [83]. Analyzing all African cattle together in comparison to commercial breeds, a significant selection signal, stronger if only B. indicus are examined (Table 1), was found in the prolactin releasing hormone (PRLH, XP-EHH = 1.49) gene region which stimulates prolactin release and regulates the expression of prolactin. We then observed that one non-synonymous SNP in exon 2, which encodes a p.Arg76His substitution, is highly conserved in the B. indicus cattle population (73%) and absent in the commercial taurine (Additional file 1: Figure S12). These results together suggest that the PRLH mutation may confer a selective advantage in regulating prolactin expression which might be linked to the thermotolerance in African cattle, especially in B. indicus.

Our GO analysis (Additional file 4) revealed the most significant enrichment of Wnt signaling (P00057) as well as pathways involved in regulating skin blood flow: endothelin signaling pathway (P00019) and histamine H1 receptor mediated signaling pathway (P04385). Thermoregulatory control of skin blood flow is vital to the maintenance of normal body temperatures during challenges to thermal homeostasis [84] and, specifically, the rise in skin blood flow during body heating contains an H1 histamine receptor component [85]. These pathways might be rapidly evolving in African cattle, which might explain their completely different degree of thermotolerance at the cellular and physiological levels compared to temperate cattle breeds.

Conclusion

In this study, we have generated for the first time a catalog of genetic variants found in selected sub-Saharan African cattle. While the studied breeds represent only a small subset of the 150 recognized on the African continent [86], they illustrate the extraordinary diversity present within and across African cattle breeds. We were able to highlight and map at the genome level some unique African adaptations, which may represent responses to climatic challenges (e.g. heat), disease resistance (e.g. trypanosomosis challenge), and artificial selection (e.g. coat color, horn development), including new genes or gene pathways putatively involved in these adaptations. These results can therefore inform targeted genomic in vitro, and in vivo studies to further test hypotheses arising from our work, and to identify underlying genomic mechanisms. On a practical note, these results provide new genomic evidence and options for designing and implementing genetic intervention strategies for improved cattle productivity and resilience in sub-Saharan Africa. Already, some of our results may provide new avenues for the improvements of livestock productivity and resilience to environmental challenges within breeds and through crossbreeding (e.g. marker-assisted selection to increase haplotypes frequencies). Perhaps most importantly, this study shows the value of comparative genome studies in cattle breeds selected for diverse environments and it argues for the value of a comprehensive continent-wide characterization of the genome landscape of African cattle. The African continent is now witnessing major transformations of its agricultural systems and rapid loss of indigenous livestock. Unfortunately, the opportunity to explore this treasure trove of diversity may not last for very much longer.

Methods

Samples and DNA re-sequencing data

Whole-blood samples (10 ml) were collected from ten Ankole, ten Boran, nine Kenana, ten N’Dama, and nine Ogaden cattle. We generated pair-end reads using Illumina HiSeq2000. DNA was isolated from whole blood using a G-DEXTMIIb Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (iNtRoN Biotechnology, Seoul, Republic of Korea) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. We randomly sheared 3 μg of genomic DNA using the Covaris System to generate inserts of ~300 bp. The fragments of sheared DNA were end-repaired, A-tailed, adaptor ligated, and amplified using a TruSeq DNA Sample Prep. Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Paired-end sequencing was conducted using the Illumina HiSeq2000 platform with TruSeq SBS Kit v3-HS (Illumina). Finally, sequence data were generated using the Illumina HiSeq system.

Incorporating our previously published data of 53 commercial breed samples (Additional file 1: Table S1), we performed a per-base sequence quality check using the fastQC software (http://www.bioinformatics.bbsrc.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). The pair-end sequence reads were then mapped against the reference bovine genome (UMD 3.1) using Bowtie2 [15]. We used default parameters (except the “--no-mixed” option) to suppress unpaired alignments for paired reads. The overall alignment rate of reads to the reference sequence was 98.84% with an average read depth of 10.8×. On average across the whole samples, the reads covered 98.56% of the reference UMD3.1 genome (Additional file 1: Table S2).

We used open-source software packages for downstream processing and variant calling. Using the “REMOVE_DUPLICATES = true” option in “MarkDuplicates” command-line tool of Picard (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard), potential PCR duplicates were filtered. We then used SAMtools [87] to create index files for reference and bam files. Genome analysis toolkit 3.1 (GATK) [88] was used to perform local realignment of reads to correct misalignments due to the presence of indels (“RealignerTargetCreator” and “IndelRealigner” arguments). The “UnifiedGenotyper” and “SelectVariants” arguments of GATK were used for calling candidate SNPs. To filter variants and avoid possible false positives, argument “VariantFiltration” of the same software was adopted with the following options: (1) SNPs with a phred-scaled quality score < 30 were filtered; (2) SNPs with MQ0 (mapping quality zero; total count across all samples of mapping quality zero reads) > 4 and quality depth (unfiltered depth of non-reference samples; low scores are indicative of false positives and artifacts) < 5 were filtered; and (3) SNPs with FS (phred-scaled P value using Fisher’s exact test) > 200 were filtered since FS represents variation on either the forward or the reverse strand, which are indicative of false-positive calls.

We additionally genotyped 45 cattle samples (of which blood samples were available) using BovineSNP50 Genotyping BeadChip (Illumina, Inc.). After filtering out SNPs based on GeneCall score < 0.7, common loci of SNP chip and DNA resequencing data were extracted and examined to assess concordance (Additional file 1: Table S4).

We used BEAGLE [89] to infer the haplotype phase and impute missing alleles for the entire set of cattle populations simultaneously. A summary of the total number of SNPs identified is provided in Additional file 1: Table S3. Sequences are available from GenBank with the Bioproject accession number PRJNA312138.

Identification of breed-specific enriched SNPs using SnpSift

We performed enrichment analysis to identify breed-specific SNPs using SnpSift [18]. In SnpSift, several statistical tests are implemented such as Fisher’s exact test and Cochran–Armitage trends test for analyzing genotype count data composed with two factors. Generally, one of the factors is fixed as the genetic model, which can be dominant, recessive, or co-dominant. The other is breed information, which was employed in this study for identifying breed-specific enriched SNPs. We had nine different cattle breeds that were used for breed-specific versus the others. From these two factors, we have constructed 2 × 2 (dominant or recessive coding/breed-specific group information) or 2 × 3 (co-dominant coding/breed-specific group information) contingency tables. As a result, three different contingency tables are generated for each breed and SNPs. We performed Fisher’s exact test and Cochran–Armitage trend test for the 2 × 2 and 2 × 3 contingency tables, respectively. A total of 37,460,739 SNPs were employed in the test; this induces multiple testing problems. To correct the multiple testing errors, we used Bonferroni correction, which is the most conservative method. After discovering significant breed-specific enriched SNPs, we annotated each SNP using snpEff. We focused on the non-synonymous SNPs (MISSENSE and NONSENSE) for this annotation.

Statistics to explore selective sweep regions in African cattle

To uncover genetic variants involved in local adaptation of each breed group, we performed comparisons between populations: (1) N’Dama versus all other African, (2) Ankole versus all other African; (3) all African versus all commercial; and (4) all B. indicus versus all commercial. The XP-EHH method was first used to detect selective sweeps using the software xpehh [32] (http://hgdp.uchicago.edu/Software/). This statistic detects haplotypes in one of the populations that have increased in frequency to the point of complete fixation [32, 34]. An XP-EHH raw score distribution plot is provided in Additional file 1: Figure S5. We then split the genome into non-overlapping segments of 50 kb to use the maximum (positive) XP-EHH score of all SNPs within a window as a summary statistic for each window. To consider the variation in SNP density, we binned genomic windows according to their numbers of SNPs in increments of 500 SNPs (combining all windows ≥ 1000 SNPs into one bin). A histogram of SNP density in each window is provided in Additional file 1: Figure S6. Within each bin, for each window i, the fraction of windows with a value of the statistic greater than that in i is defined as the empirical P value, following the method previously reported [34, 90]. The regions with P values less than 0.005 (0.5%) were considered significant signals in the breed group of interest. This approach is suitable, especially with the unreliable demographic model and parameters, as is the case for cattle [34]. However, loci detected as being under selection using this approach may under-represent selection on standing variation [91].

We additionally performed the XP-CLR [33] to search for regions in the genome where the change in allele frequency at the locus occurred too quickly, which is assessed by the size of the affected region. XP-CLR scores were calculated using scripts available at (http://genetics.med.harvard.edu/reich/Reich_Lab/Software.html). We used the following options: non-overlapping sliding windows of 50 kb, maximum number of SNPs within each window as 600, and correlation level of 0.95 from which the SNPs contribution to the XP-CLR result was down-weighted. The regions with the XP-CLR values in the top 0.5% of the empirical distribution were designated as putative selective sweeps.

“Significant” genomic regions identified from XP-EHH and XP-CLR tests were annotated to the closest genes (UMD 3.1). Genes that overlap the significant window regions were defined as candidate genes. PANTHER (version 11.0) [92] was used to determine if there was any significant over-representation of genes with particular functional categories (GO-slim Biological Process and PANTHER pathways), that is, functional enrichment, among positive selected genes in each African breed. P value of 0.05 (no correction for multiple testing) was used as the criterion for statistical significance. Heat tolerance trait QTL from the animal QTL database (Animal QTLdb, http://www.animalgenome.org/cgi-bin/QTLdb/index) were defined by a trait class of “Heat tolerance” [93].

Population differentiation and structure

For PCA, we used genome-wide complex trait analysis (GCTA) [94] to estimate the eigenvectors, which is asymptotically equivalent to those from the PCA implemented in EIGENSTRAT [22], incorporating genotype data from all samples. For admixture analysis, we restricted the genotype data to a random subset of ~ 20,000 of total SNPs using PLINK (--thin option) [95] to run the “admixture” model in STRUCTURE version 2.3 [23]. We chose 20,000 iterations after a burn-in of 50,000 iterations and the analysis was repeated ten times for each K value. The output of STRUCTURE was then analyzed in STRUCTURE HARVESTER [96], which implements the Evanno method to infer the most likely number of clustered populations. We used VCFtools 4.0 [97] to estimate nucleotide diversity (in windows of 10 Mb) and the Fst divergence statistic with the VCFtools implementation of Fst and weighted Fst estimators as described in Weir and Cockerham [98] for each pair of populations. Linkage disequilibrium between pairs of markers were assessed using PLINK [95]. The r 2 value was calculated between all pairs of SNPs with inter-SNP distances of less than 20 kb (r 2 and ld-window parameters). Moving averages (sliding windows) of the pairwise LD coefficients were then carried out in 20-kb windows with 5-kb steps). We used Haploview software [95] to evaluate the haplotype structure and estimate haplotype frequencies.

Phylogenetic reconstruction and inference of demographic history

A neighbor-joining tree was constructed with FigTree v1.4.0 on the basis of the IBS distance matrix data of all samples calculated by PLINK [95]. We also inferred a population-level phylogeny using the maximum likelihood (ML) approach implemented in TreeMix [29]. The window size of 1000 was used to account for linkage disequilibrium (-k) and “-global” to generate the ML tree. Migration events (-m) were sequentially added to the tree. The recent demographic history was inferred by the trend in effective population size (Ne) change using PopSizeABC [25] with default parameters set for cattle population (mutation rate and recombination of 1e-8, MAF > 20%, size of each segment = 2,000,000) and simulated 50,000 datasets. The 90% credible intervals associated with the estimated population size histories for each breed are shown in Additional file 1: Figure S3.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The following institutions and their personnel provided help for the sampling of the African cattle: ILRI Kapiti Ranch (Kenyan Boran), Direction Nationale de l’Élevage Guinea (N’Dama), Ministry of Animal Resources, Fisheries and Range, Sudan (Kenana), Ol Pejeta Conservancy, Kenya (Ankole originating from Uganda), Institute of Biodiversity (Ogaden), Ethiopia. Last, but not least, we thank the Directors of Veterinary Services and the cattle keepers from Ethiopia Guinea, Kenya, Uganda, and Sudan for their assistance and permission to sample the animals. We also thank all donors which, through their contributions to the CGIAR system, support the work of ILRI.

Funding

This work was supported by Agenda (PJ01040603) of the National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration (RDA), Republic of Korea and by a grant from the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (Project No. PJ01104401), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Availability of data and materials

The 48 newly sequenced African cattle genomes in this study are publicly available from GenBank with the Bioproject accession number PRJNA312138. The NCBI-SRA accession numbers are available in Additional file 1: Table S2. All SNPs are deposited in dbSNP under handle BIOPOP. A full list of accession numbers for the 53 commercial cattle genomes (PRJNA210521, PRJNA318089, PRJNA318087, and PRJNA210523) is provided in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Authors’ contributions

OH, OAM, TD, KS, DL, SC, HJL, DY, SJO, SK, KHL, and HK conceived of and designed all of the described experiments. OAM, TD, SB, and BD contributed to sample collection. JK, WK, SS, MS, HJ, TK, KK, and MT analyzed the data. JK, OH, OAM, MA, and HK drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval

Blood samples were collected during routine veterinary treatments with the logistical support and agreement of relevant agricultural institutions in each country (Direction Nationale de l’Élevage, Guinea (N’Dama); Ministry of Animal Resources, Sudan (Kenana); Ol Pejeta Conservancy, Kenya (Ankole); Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Ethiopia (Ogaden); no further specific ethics permissions were required for this study. For previously published taurine samples, all animal work was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Institute of Animal Science in Korea under approval numbers 2012-C-005 (Holstein and Hanwoo) and NIAS-2014-093 (Angus and Jersey). All animals were handled in strict accordance with good animal practice.

Disclaimer

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
C&K genomics, Seoul National University Research Park
(2)
The University of Nottingham, School of Life Sciences
(3)
International Livestock Research institute (ILRI)
(4)
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)
(5)
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Khartoum
(6)
National Coordinateur RGA, Ministère Elevage – Productions Animales
(7)
Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology
(8)
Interdisciplinary Program in Bioinformatics, Seoul National University
(9)
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois
(10)
Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University
(11)
College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Bahir Dar University
(12)
The Animal Molecular Genetics and Breeding Center, Chonbuk National University
(13)
Division of Animal Genomics & Bioinformatics, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA
(14)
Animal Nutritional & Physiology Team, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA
(15)
Department of Animal Science, Kyungpook National University
(16)
National Institute of Animal Science, RDA
(17)
The Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health, The Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus
(18)
Department of Animal Biotechnology, Chonbuk National University
(19)
Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Shinshu University

References

  1. Schneider HK. The subsistence role of cattle among the Pakot and in East Africa. Am Anthropol. 1957;59:278–300.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. di Lernia S, Tafuri MA, Gallinaro M, Alhaique F, Balasse M, Cavorsi L, et al. Inside the “African cattle complex”: Animal burials in the Holocene central Sahara. PLoS One. 2013;8:e56879.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Herskovits MJ. The cattle complex in East Africa*. Am Anthropol. 1926;28:230–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradley D, MacHugh D, Loftus R, Sow R, Hoste C, Cunningham E. Zebu‐taurine variation in Y chromosomal DNA: a sensitive assay for genetic introgression in West African trypanotolerant cattle populations. Anim Genet. 1994;25:7–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Freeman A, Meghen C, Machugh D, Loftus R, Achukwi M, Bado A, et al. Admixture and diversity in West African cattle populations. Mol Ecol. 2004;13:3477–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hanotte O, Bradley DG, Ochieng JW, Verjee Y, Hill EW, Rege JEO. African pastoralism: genetic imprints of origins and migrations. Science. 2002;296:336–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Rege J, Hanotte O, Mamo Y, Asrat B, Dessie T. Domestic Animal Genetic Resources Information System (DAGRIS). Addis Ababa: International Livestock Research Institute; 2007.Google Scholar
  8. Mwai O, Hanotte O, Kwon Y-J, Cho S. African indigenous cattle: unique genetic resources in a rapidly changing world. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 2015;28:911.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonfiglio S, Ginja C, De Gaetano A, Achilli A, Olivieri A, Colli L, et al. Origin and spread of Bos taurus: new clues from mitochondrial genomes belonging to haplogroup T1. PLoS One. 2012;7:e38601.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Decker JE, McKay SD, Rolf MM, Kim J, Alcalá AM, Sonstegard TS, et al. Worldwide patterns of ancestry, divergence, and admixture in domesticated cattle. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004254.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Jahnke HE, Jahnke HE. Livestock production systems and livestock development in tropical Africa. Kiel: Kieler Wissenschaftsverlag Vauk; 1982.Google Scholar
  12. Murray M, Morrison W, Whitelaw D. Host susceptibility to African trypanosomiasis: trypanotolerance. Adv Parasitol. 1982;21:1–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Menjo D, Bebe B, Okeyo A, Ojango J. Survival of Holstein-Friesian heifers on commercial dairy farms in Kenya. Appl Anim Husb Rural Dev. 2009;2:14–7.Google Scholar
  14. Hanotte O, Dessie T, Kemp S. Time to tap Africa’s livestock genomes. Science (Washington). 2010;328:1640–1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Canavez FC, Luche DD, Stothard P, Leite KR, Sousa-Canavez JM, Plastow G, et al. Genome sequence and assembly of Bos indicus. J Hered. 2012;103:342–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297–303.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Cingolani P, Patel VM, Coon M, Nguyen T, Land SJ, Ruden DM, et al. Using Drosophila melanogaster as a model for genotoxic chemical mutational studies with a new program. SnpSift Front Genet. 2012;3:35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Nei M, Li W-H. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1979;76:5269–73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. d’Ieteren G, Authie E, Wissocq N, Murray M. Trypanotolerance, an option for sustainable livestock production in areas at risk from trypanosomosis. Rev Sci Tech (International Office of Epizootics). 1998;17:154–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Choi J-W, Lee K-T, Liao X, Stothard P, An H-S, Ahn S, et al. Genome-wide copy number variation in Hanwoo, Black Angus, and Holstein cattle. Mamm Genome. 2013;24:151–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2006;38:904–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hubisz MJ, Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol Ecol Resour. 2009;9:1322–32.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005;14:2611–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Boitard S, Rodriguez W, Jay F, Mona S, Austerlitz F. Inferring population size history from large samples of genome-wide molecular data-an approximate Bayesian computation approach. PLoS Genet. 2016;12:e1005877.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Williamson G, Payne WJA. An introduction to animal husbandry in the tropics. London, New York: Longman; 1978Google Scholar
  27. Gautier M, Flori L, Riebler A, Jaffrézic F, Laloé D, Gut I, et al. A whole genome Bayesian scan for adaptive genetic divergence in West African cattle. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Zeder MA. Domestication and early agriculture in the Mediterranean Basin: Origins, diffusion, and impact. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105:11597–604.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Pickrell JK, Pritchard JK. Inference of population splits and mixtures from genome-wide allele frequency data. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002967.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Mugerwa J, Christensen D, Ochetim S. Grazing behaviour of exotic dairy cattle in Uganda. East Afr Agric For J. 1973;39:1–11.Google Scholar
  31. McTavish EJ, Decker JE, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Hillis DM. New World cattle show ancestry from multiple independent domestication events. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110:E1398–406.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Sabeti PC, Varilly P, Fry B, Lohmueller J, Hostetter E, Cotsapas C, et al. Genome-wide detection and characterization of positive selection in human populations. Nature. 2007;449:913–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Chen H, Patterson N, Reich D. Population differentiation as a test for selective sweeps. Genome Res. 2010;20:393–402.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Pickrell JK, Coop G, Novembre J, Kudaravalli S, Li JZ, Absher D, et al. Signals of recent positive selection in a worldwide sample of human populations. Genome Res. 2009;19:826–37.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Kalinowski S. Do polymorphic loci require large sample sizes to estimate genetic distances? Heredity. 2005;94:33–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee H-J, Kim J, Lee T, Son JK, Yoon H-B, Baek K-S, et al. Deciphering the genetic blueprint behind Holstein milk proteins and production. Genome Biol Evol. 2014;6:1366–74.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Kristjanson P, Swallow BM, Rowlands G, Kruska R, De Leeuw P. Measuring the costs of African animal trypanosomosis, the potential benefits of control and returns to research. Agric Syst. 1999;59:79–98.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Geerts S, Holmes PH. Drug management and parasite resistance in bovine trypanosomiasis in Africa (PAAT technical and scientific series). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 1998.Google Scholar
  39. Roelants G. Natural resistance to African trypanosomiasis. Parasite Immunol. 1986;8:1–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Willie JT, Chemelli RM, Sinton CM, Yanagisawa M. To eat or to sleep? Orexin in the regulation of feeding and wakefulness. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:429–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kunii K, Yamanaka A, Nambu T, Matsuzaki I, Goto K, Sakurai T. Orexins/hypocretins regulate drinking behaviour. Brain Res. 1999;842:256–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sweet DC, Levine AS, Billington CJ, Kotz CM. Feeding response to central orexins. Brain Res. 1999;821:535–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Sakurai T. Orexins and orexin receptors: implication in feeding behavior. Regul Pept. 1999;85:25–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Steverding D. The history of African trypanosomiasis. Parasit Vectors. 2008;1:1–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Paling R, Moloo S, Scott J, McOdimba F, Enfrey LLH, Murray M, et al. Susceptibility of N’Dama and Boran cattle to tsetse‐transmitted primary and rechallenge infections with a homologous serodeme of Trypanosoma congolense. Parasite Immunol. 1991;13:413–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Murray M, Trail J, D’Ieteren G. Trypanotolerance in cattle and prospects for the control of trypanosomiasis by selective breeding. Rev Sci Tech (International Office of Epizootics). 1990;9:369.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Naessens J. Bovine trypanotolerance: a natural ability to prevent severe anaemia and haemophagocytic syndrome? Int J Parasitol. 2006;36:521–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Naessens J, Teale A, Sileghem M. Identification of mechanisms of natural resistance to African trypanosomiasis in cattle. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2002;87:187–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Noyes H, Brass A, Obara I, Anderson S, Archibald AL, Bradley DG, et al. Genetic and expression analysis of cattle identifies candidate genes in pathways responding to Trypanosoma congolense infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108:9304–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Donovan A, Lima CA, Pinkus JL, Pinkus GS, Zon LI, Robine S, et al. The iron exporter ferroportin/Slc40a1 is essential for iron homeostasis. Cell Metab. 2005;1:191–200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Stewart GW. Stomatin. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1997;29:271–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Sakamoto D, Kudo H, Inohaya K, Yokoi H, Narita T, Naruse K, et al. A mutation in the gene for δ-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase (ALAD) causes hypochromic anemia in the medaka. Oryzias latipes Mech Dev. 2004;121:747–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Bouhassira EE, Schwartz RS, Yawata Y, Ata K, Kanzaki A, Qiu J, et al. An alanine-to-threonine substitution in protein 4.2 cDNA is associated with a Japanese form of hereditary hemolytic anemia (protein 4.2 NIPPON). Blood. 1992;79:1846–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Doherty L, Sheen MR, Vlachos A, Choesmel V, O’Donohue M-F, Clinton C, et al. Ribosomal protein genes RPS10 and RPS26 are commonly mutated in Diamond-Blackfan anemia. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;86:222–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Chae H, Park J, Lee S, Kim M, Kim Y, Lee J-W, et al. Ribosomal protein mutations in Korean patients with Diamond-Blackfan anemia. Exp Mol Med. 2014;46:e88.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Gazda HT, Preti M, Sheen MR, O’Donohue MF, Vlachos A, Davies SM, et al. Frameshift mutation in p53 regulator RPL26 is associated with multiple physical abnormalities and a specific pre‐ribosomal RNA processing defect in diamond–blackfan anemia. Hum Mutat. 2012;33:1037–44.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Hall BS, Tam W, Sen R, Pereira ME. Cell-specific Activation of Nuclear Factor-κB by the ParasiteTrypanosoma cruzi Promotes Resistance to Intracellular Infection. Mol Biol Cell. 2000;11:153–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Baral TN. Immunobiology of African trypanosomes: need of alternative interventions. Biomed Res Int. 2010;2010:389153.Google Scholar
  59. Duxbury R, Sadun E, Wellde B, Anderson J, Muriithi I. Immunization of cattle with x-irradiated African trypanosomes. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1972;66:349–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Sileghem M, Darji A, Hamers R, De Baetselier P. Modulation of IL-1 production and IL-1 release during experimental trypanosome infections. Immunology. 1989;68:137.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Ndumu D, Baumung R, Wurzinger M, Drucker A, Okeyo A, Semambo D, et al. Performance and fitness traits versus phenotypic appearance in the African Ankole Longhorn cattle: A novel approach to identify selection criteria for indigenous breeds. Livest Sci. 2008;113:234–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Abitbol M, Legrand R, Tiret L. A missense mutation in melanocortin 1 receptor is associated with the red coat colour in donkeys. Anim Genet. 2014;45:878–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Marklund L, Moller MJ, Sandberg K, Andersson L. A missense mutation in the gene for melanocyte-stimulating hormone receptor (MCIR) is associated with the chestnut coat color in horses. Mamm Genome. 1996;7:895–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Moller MJ, Chaudhary R, Hellmen E, Höyheim B, Chowdhary B, Andersson L. Pigs with the dominant white coat color phenotype carry a duplication of the KIT gene encoding the mast/stem cell growth factor receptor. Mamm Genome. 1996;7:822–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Philipp U, Lupp B, Mömke S, Stein V, Tipold A, Eule JC, et al. A MITF mutation associated with a dominant white phenotype and bilateral deafness in German Fleckvieh cattle. PLoS One. 2011;6:e28857.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Johansson M, Ellegren H, Marklund L, Gustavsson U, Ringmar-Cederberg E, Andersson K, Edfors-Lilja I, Andersson L. The gene for dominant white color in the pig is closely linked to ALB and PDGFRA on chromosome 8. Genomics 1992;14:965–9.Google Scholar
  67. Liu L, Harris B, Keehan M, Zhang Y. Genome scan for the degree of white spotting in dairy cattle. Anim Genet. 2009;40:975–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Glatzer S, Merten NJ, Dierks C, Wöhlke A, Philipp U, Distl O. A Single nucleotide polymorphism within the Interferon Gamma Receptor 2 gene perfectly coincides with polledness in Holstein cattle. PLoS One. 2013;8:e67992.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Georges M, Drinkwaterz R, Kingz T, Mishra A, Moorez SS. Microsatellite mapping of a gene affecting horn development in Bos taurus. Nat Genet. 1993;4:206–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Dove WF. The physiology of horn growth: a study of the morphogenesis, the interaction of tissues, and the evolutionary processes of a Mendelian recessive character by means of transplantation of tissues. J Exp Zool. 1935;69:347–405.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Liu Z, Lavine KJ, Hung IH, Ornitz DM. FGF18 is required for early chondrocyte proliferation, hypertrophy and vascular invasion of the growth plate. Dev Biol. 2007;302:80–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Shimoaka T, Ogasawara T, Yonamine A, Chikazu D, Kawano H, Nakamura K, et al. Regulation of osteoblast, chondrocyte, and osteoclast functions by fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-18 in comparison with FGF-2 and FGF-10. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:7493–500.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Grigson C. An African origin for African cattle?—some archaeological evidence. Afr Archaeol Rev. 1991;9:119–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Mason IL, Maule JP. The indigenous livestock of Eastern and Southern Africa, The indigenous livestock of Eastern and Southern Africa. 1960.Google Scholar
  75. Martinez M, Machado M, Nascimento C, Silva M, Teodoro R, Furlong J, et al. Association of BoLA-DRB3. 2 alleles with tick (Boophilus microplus) resistance in cattle. Genet Mol Res. 2006;5:513–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Spooner R, Leveziel H, Grosclaude F, Oliver R, Vaiman M. Evidence for a possible major histocompatibility complex (BLA) in cattle. Int J Immunogenet. 1978;5:335–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Teale AJ, Kemp SJ, Morrison WI. The major histocompatibility complex and disease resistance in cattle. In: Owen JB, Axford RFE, editors. Breeding for disease resistance in farm animals. Wallingford: CAB International; 1991. p. 162–86.Google Scholar
  78. Hu Z-L, Park CA, Wu X-L, Reecy JM. Animal QTLdb: an improved database tool for livestock animal QTL/association data dissemination in the post-genome era. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D871–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Beckham JT, Mackanos MA, Crooke C, Takahashl T, O’Connell‐Rodwell C, Contag CH, et al. Assessment of cellular response to thermal laser injury through bioluminescence imaging of heat shock protein 70. Photochem Photobiol. 2004;79:76–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Basiricò L, Morera P, Primi V, Lacetera N, Nardone A, Bernabucci U. Cellular thermotolerance is associated with heat shock protein 70.1 genetic polymorphisms in Holstein lactating cows. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2011;16:441–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  81. Hansen P. Physiological and cellular adaptations of zebu cattle to thermal stress. Anim Reprod Sci. 2004;82:349–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Okado-Matsumoto A, Fridovich I. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a proposed mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2002;99:9010–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  83. Littlejohn MD, Henty KM, Tiplady K, Johnson T, Harland C, Lopdell T, et al. Functionally reciprocal mutations of the prolactin signalling pathway define hairy and slick cattle. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5861.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  84. Charkoudian N. Skin blood flow in adult human thermoregulation: how it works, when it does not, and why. In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Elsevier; 2003;78:603–612.Google Scholar
  85. Wong BJ, Wilkins BW, Minson CT. H1 but not H2 histamine receptor activation contributes to the rise in skin blood flow during whole body heating in humans. J Physiol. 2004;560:941–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  86. Rege J. The state of African cattle genetic resources I. Classification framework and identification of threatened and extinct breeds. Animal Genet Resour Inf. 1999;25:1–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Li R, Fan W, Tian G, Zhu H, He L, Cai J, et al. The sequence and de novo assembly of the giant panda genome. Nature. 2009;463:311–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  88. Nekrutenko A, Taylor J. Next-generation sequencing data interpretation: enhancing reproducibility and accessibility. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13:667–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Browning SR, Browning BL. Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:1084.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Granka JM, Henn BM, Gignoux CR, Kidd JM, Bustamante CD, Feldman MW. Limited evidence for classic selective sweeps in African populations. Genetics. 2012;192:1049–64.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  91. Teshima KM, Coop G, Przeworski M. How reliable are empirical genomic scans for selective sweeps? Genome Res. 2006;16:702–12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  92. Thomas PD, Campbell MJ, Kejariwal A, Mi H, Karlak B, Daverman R, et al. PANTHER: a library of protein families and subfamilies indexed by function. Genome Res. 2003;13:2129–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  93. Hu Z-L, Reecy JM. Animal QTLdb: beyond a repository. Mamm Genome. 2007;18:1–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Yang J, Lee SH, Goddard ME, Visscher PM. GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;88:76.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  95. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:559–75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  96. Earl DA. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour. 2012;4:359–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2156–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  98. Weir BS, Cockerham CC. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution. 1984;38:1358–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement