Skip to main content

Global transcriptional responses of fission and budding yeast to changes in copper and iron levels: a comparative study



Recent studies in comparative genomics demonstrate that interspecies comparison represents a powerful tool for identifying both conserved and specialized biologic processes across large evolutionary distances. All cells must adjust to environmental fluctuations in metal levels, because levels that are too low or too high can be detrimental. Here we explore the conservation of metal homoeostasis in two distantly related yeasts.


We examined genome-wide gene expression responses to changing copper and iron levels in budding and fission yeast using DNA microarrays. The comparison reveals conservation of only a small core set of genes, defining the copper and iron regulons, with a larger number of additional genes being specific for each species. Novel regulatory targets were identified in Schizosaccharomyces pombe for Cuf1p (pex7 and SPAC3G6.05) and Fep1p (srx1, sib1, sib2, rds1, isu1, SPBC27B12.03c, SPAC1F8.02c, and SPBC947.05c). We also present evidence refuting a direct role of Cuf1p in the repression of genes involved in iron uptake. Remarkable differences were detected in responses of the two yeasts to excess copper, probably reflecting evolutionary adaptation to different environments.


The considerable evolutionary distance between budding and fission yeast resulted in substantial diversion in the regulation of copper and iron homeostasis. Despite these differences, the conserved regulation of a core set of genes involved in the uptake of these metals provides valuable clues to key features of metal metabolism.


Interspecies comparisons are powerful techniques for gaining insight into biologic processes and their evolution. Accurate annotation of sequenced genomes heavily depends on the availability of gene and protein sequences from other species to allow identification and functional characterization of novel genes by similarity [1, 2]. Another area that benefits from interspecies comparisons through the use of cellular and animal model systems is the study of human disease, in which it is often not possible to investigate underlying defects directly. Key to the applicability of these models is the extent to which they accurately reflect the biologic system of interest. Here we address this issue for two metal homeostatic systems, by examining the conservation of transcriptional responses to changing copper and iron levels in budding and fission yeast.

Because of its redox properties, copper is an essential cofactor of many enzymes involved in free radical scavenging, including copper-zinc superoxide dismutase and the respiratory chain (cytochrome c oxidase). On the other hand, an excess of free copper can react with oxygen, generating reactive oxygen species that damage cellular components such as nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids. To prevent this from happening, specialized homeostatic mechanisms that tightly control the availability of copper within cells are present in virtually all organisms. These mechanisms have been extensively studied in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and the components involved are highly conserved from prokaryotes to humans [3, 4]. The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe provides a complementary model of copper homeostasis. It is estimated that S. pombe diverged from S. cerevisiae approximately 0.3 to 1.1 billion years ago [5], and many gene sequences are as distantly related between the two yeasts as to their human homologs. A comparison between budding and fission yeast can therefore provide valuable information on the degree to which copper pathways have diverged during evolution.

Copper trafficking in S. cerevisiae begins at the plasma membrane, where it is taken up as Cu(I) by the Ctr1p and Ctr3p transporters [6]. Under normal conditions this also requires the action of the ferric/cupric reductases Fre1p and Fre2p [7, 8]. Regulation of the copper uptake system is mediated at the transcriptional level by the copper-sensing regulator Mac1p [911]. Once in the cytoplasm, copper is shuttled to its target proteins by specific intracellular copper chaperones [12]. One of these chaperones, namely Atx1p, delivers copper to the Ccc2p ATPase in the Golgi system for incorporation into the cuproenzymes Fet3p and Fet5p [13]. These paralogous proteins are multi-copper oxidases that exhibit ferrous oxidase activity and form a high-affinity iron transport complex with the Ftr1p and Fth1p proteins, respectively [1416]. Copper must therefore be available for the iron transport/mobilization machinery to function, and low copper availability leads to secondary iron starvation in S. cerevisiae [1719].

Similar to copper, iron must be reduced before its uptake at the plasma membrane. This process is partly mediated by the same Fre1p and Fre2p reductases that play a role in copper uptake, together with four additional paralogs (Fre3p to Fre6p) [2022]. A second, nonreductive iron uptake system involves the four proteins Arn1p to Arn4p, which can acquire iron from siderophore-iron chelates in the medium [2327]. The intimate link between copper and iron metabolism in S. cerevisiae is reflected by the fact that Rcs1p (Aft1p), which is the transcription factor responsible for induction of the iron uptake systems, also regulates FRE1, CCC2, ATX1, FET3 and FET5, which are involved in copper trafficking [28, 29]. A second iron-responsive transcription factor, Aft2p, regulates a subset of Aft1p targets [30], but its role in iron homeostasis is less well understood.

When copper levels are high, S. cerevisiae specifically induces expression of SOD1 and the CUP1a/b and CRS5 metallothioneins [3133]. Metallothioneins represent a group of intracellular, low-molecular-weight, cysteine-rich proteins that sequester free metal ions, preventing their toxic accumulation in the cell. The response to high copper is mediated by the transcriptional regulator Ace1p (Cup2p) [34, 35].

Compared with S. cerevisiae, copper metabolism in S. pombe is less well understood, although homologs to several budding yeast core components have now been experimentally characterized. Three genes encode the high affinity copper uptake transporters: ctr4 and ctr5, whose products are localized to the plasma membrane, and ctr6, which encodes a vacuolar membrane transporter [36]. Expression of these transporters is regulated by Cuf1p, which is functionally similar to S. cerevisiae Mac1p [37, 38]. Both the reductive and nonreductive iron uptake systems are also present in S. pombe. The reductive system consists of the ferric reductase Frp1p, the Fio1p multi-copper oxidase, and the Fip1p permease [39, 40], whereas the siderophore-iron transporters are encoded by str1, str2, and str3 [41]. When sufficient iron is available, expression of the reductive and nonreductive uptake systems is repressed by the Fep1p transcription factor [41, 42]. Interestingly, in contrast to S. cerevisiae Mac1p, the copper-dependent regulator Cuf1p was reported to repress directly the reductive iron uptake system during copper starvation in S. pombe [43].

Only two genes have thus far been implicated in resistance to high copper stress in S. pombe. These encode the superoxide dismutase copper chaperone Ccs1p [44] and a phytochelatin synthase (PCS) [45]. Phytochelatins are a class of peptides that play an important role in heavy metal detoxification in plants and fungi, but which are absent in S. cerevisiae. They are nontranslationally synthesized by PCS from glutathione and can sequester unbound heavy metals. Loss of function of either of the genes encoding Ccs1p or PCS results in increased sensitivity to high copper levels in fission yeast [44, 45]. One metallothionein gene, zym1, has also been identified in S. pombe, but exposure to high copper did not affect its expression level [46]. No transcription factors that regulate the response to high copper have thus far been described.

Global gene expression studies have been insightful in exploring transcriptional responses to stress in both budding and fission yeast [47, 48]. To identify novel fission yeast genes that may play a role in copper and iron homeostasis, we used DNA microarrays to evaluate differential gene expression in S. pombe cells growing under varying copper and iron levels. The results were compared with data gathered from a similar set of experiments conducted in S. cerevisiae [19] in order to determine the extent to which responses to changes in environmental copper levels have diverged between the two yeasts. We show that despite conservation of core elements, significant differences exist in the regulation of copper and iron metabolism genes in budding and fission yeast, in particular in their responses to copper toxicity. Our findings also provide new insights into the coregulation of copper and iron metabolism in S. pombe.


We monitored global gene expression in S. pombe wild-type cells in response to changes in environmental copper levels. Two conditions were initially investigated: copper starvation (100 μmol/l bathocuproinedisulfonic acid [BCS], a copper chelator) and copper excess (2 or 25 μmol/l CuSO4). These conditions allowed induction of known copper-dependent genes without adverse effects on growth rate that could confound the results. The conditions for copper starvation were chosen based on data from the literature [36, 44]. For copper excess, we tested a number of concentrations close to the levels that were known to affect growth in S. cerevisiae [19], and selected those that did not negatively affect S. pombe growth rate (data not shown). RNA samples were collected at regular intervals after addition of either BCS or CuSO4 and compared with untreated wild-type cells by DNA microarray analysis.

Copper deprivation does not cause significant iron starvation in fission yeast

The classes of genes whose expression was either induced or repressed under copper starvation in fission yeast are listed in Table 1 (also see Additional data file 1 [Supplementary table 1]). A major group of genes upregulated by BCS addition was involved in metal ion uptake, including genes encoding copper transporters, namely ctr5 and ctr6, which have previously been reported to be induced in states of low copper [36, 43, 49]. Ctr5p is known to form a functional complex with Ctr4p [49]. The gene for the latter protein was not represented on the arrays, but it was found to be highly induced (>24×) in a real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) performed on the same samples used for the microarray experiment (Additional data file 1 [Supplementary table 1]).

Table 1 Gene classes induced and repressed upon changes in S. pombe copper or iron status

A number of predicted flavoproteins, oxidoreductases, and dehydrogenases were downregulated during copper starvation (Table 1). These enzymes catalyze a wide range of biochemical reactions, and their repression may reflect a need for copper in some of these processes. Reduced expression of the antioxidant genes gst2 and sod1, which encode a glutathione S-transferase and a copper-zinc superoxide dismutase, respectively, is not surprising, considering the aforementioned link between copper and the generation of free radicals. Downregulation of sod1 may also result from the reduced availability of copper, which is needed to convert apo-Sod1p to its active form.

Previous expression studies in budding yeast have identified a number of genes that are consistently differentially expressed in varying copper levels [1719]. For our comparison with fission yeast, we used a recent microarray time-course dataset that closely matches ours with respect to experimental setup, allowing direct comparison between the two yeasts [19]. In this study, four gene clusters were described whose mRNA expression was altered in copper starvation or excess. Three of these clusters contain genes that are involved in copper uptake, copper detoxification, or iron uptake, which are respectively regulated by Mac1p, Ace1p, and Rcs1p/Aft2p (Figure 1). The late induction of the iron regulon in conditions of low copper is thought to result from a secondary iron starvation [1719]. A fourth cluster was downregulated after prolonged copper deprivation and contains genes that function in the mitochondrion, including a large component of the respiratory chain. Regulation of this latter group is believed to be linked to a dependency on copper or iron by these metabolic processes [19]. Many of the genes that are implicated in copper and iron metabolism in S. cerevisiae have homologs in S. pombe. For this study we used orthologs from a manually curated list [47]; when these were unavailable, homologs were identified on the basis of sequence similarity. To determine the extent to which the S. pombe homologs are similarly controlled at the transcriptional level as their S. cerevisiae counterparts, we compared their expression patterns during varying copper conditions. Figure 1 shows a direct comparison between homologous gene pairs in four transcriptional clusters with a specific role in copper or iron metabolism in either yeast. The same gene clusters are used in Figure 2 to summarize how many genes from each group exhibit conserved regulation between S. pombe and S. cerevisiae in response to changing copper and iron availability. In addition, the expression patterns for homologs that exhibit conserved expression in both S. pombe and S. cerevisiae are indicated for direct comparison of the timing and amplitude of expression changes.

Figure 1
figure 1

Comparison of copper and iron metabolism between budding and fission yeast. The transcriptional responses of four clusters of S. cerevisiae genes identified by Van Bakel and coworkers [19] to changing copper levels are shown in comparison with expression changes in S. pombe homologs under similar conditions. Fission yeast genes with curated orthologs in budding yeast are indicated by asterisks. The clusters were supplemented with 10 additional genes that are known to be involved in S. cerevisiae copper and iron metabolism (+), as well as three genes found outside these clusters (other) [19]. The maximal fold change in expression over time, as determined from averaged replicates at each time point, is displayed for each gene for the experimental conditions used (pCu-, low copper, 100 μmol/l bathocuproinedisulfonic acid [BCS]; pFe-, low iron, 100 μmol/l ferrozine; pCu+, high copper, 2 μmol/l CuSO4; cCu-, low copper, 100 μmol/l BCS; cCu+, high copper, 8 μmol/l CuSO4). The graded color scale at the bottom indicates the magnitude of expression changes.

Figure 2
figure 2

Differences in transcriptional profiles of known copper and iron regulated genes between S. pombe and S. cerevisiae. The S. pombe genes implicated in copper or iron metabolism by homology with S. cerevisiae (Table 1) were compared with the set of genes that exhibited expression changes in response to changes in copper or iron levels. Overlaps between these lists indicate conserved regulation and are visualized in Venn diagrams. The central circle in each Venn diagram indicates the total number of differentially expressed genes in conditions of (a) low copper, (b) low iron, or (c) high copper. Individual gene clusters with a role in copper or iron metabolism are shown in different colors. The behavior of homologous genes in S. cerevisiae is shown in comparison. The temporal transcriptional profiles for overlapping segments in the Venn diagrams, representing conserved copper and iron dependent gene regulation, are visualized in graphs that plot the averaged expression ratio as a function of time.

When evaluating the transcriptional profiles of budding and fission yeast in response to copper deprivation, a striking difference was observed in the number of differentially expressed genes (Figure 2a). Of the four copper responsive gene clusters described in S. cerevisiae, major expression changes in S. pombe were only observed for homologs to the cluster involved in copper uptake (ctr4, ctr5, ctr6, and SPCC11E10.01; Figures 1 and 2a). The timing of induction of the copper uptake systems is similar in both yeasts, with strong induction of ctr5 in S. pombe and CTR1 in S. cerevisiae over a period of 3 hours (Figure 2a). The marked upregulation of the complete iron regulon in S. cerevisiae, starting after 2 hours of copper deprivation and peaking at 3 hours, is virtually absent in S. pombe, with the exception of str1 and frp1 (Figures 1 and 2a) [40, 41]. Induction of str1 was confirmed in three independent microarray experiments, whereas induction of frp1 was validated by real-time PCR (data not shown), because of missing data in two experiments. The lack of substantial induction of genes involved in iron uptake suggests that, in the experimental conditions used here, copper deprivation does not lead to a significant secondary iron starvation.

A core set of iron regulated genes is conserved between the S. cerevisiae and S. pombe

To identify putative novel genes involved in iron metabolism, we treated S. pombe cells with the specific iron chelator ferrozine (300 μmol/l). Iron deprivation caused changes in the expression of 56 genes (Additional data file 1 [Supplementary table 2]), which were of much greater amplitude than was found during copper starvation (Figure 2a,b). Many of the induced genes can be directly linked to iron uptake (eight genes) and processing (one gene), whereas those downregulated are involved in metabolic processes, which is consistent with previous reports on S. cerevisiae (Table 1) [19, 50]. A large overlap was observed between the cluster of mitochondrial genes in S. cerevisiae and their homologs in S. pombe, supporting the initial assumption that the changes in this cluster after copper deprivation in budding yeast are linked to secondary iron starvation [19] (Figure 2).

A core set of nine S. pombe homologs exhibited conserved regulation as compared with the iron regulon in S. cerevisiae (Figure 2b). These include the five previously identified iron regulated genes (frp1, str3, fio1, fip1, and str1) as well as two predicted novel ones: SPBC947.05c and isu1. Both of these can be directly linked to iron metabolism. Isu1 encodes a scaffold protein that is involved in mitochondrial iron-sulfur cluster biosynthesis [51]. SPBC947.05c is predicted to encode a ferric reductase similar to Frp1p, suggesting a role in the reduction of iron before its uptake by the Fip1p-Fio1p complex. Two additional genes encoding a vitamin H transporter (vht1) and a predicted mitochondrial iron transporter (SPAC8C9.12c) are homologous to genes induced as part of the S. cerevisiae iron regulon [17, 19, 52], but they lack a consensus Fep1p binding site. Considering the conserved regulation between the two yeasts in response to iron deprivation, these genes still represent good candidates for a role in iron metabolism.

An interesting finding was the relatively strong upregulation of ctr5 (4.3-fold) together with the iron uptake system, which may occur to ensure the availability of copper for incorporation into the Fio1p oxidase. In the absence of a putative Fep1p binding site in the promoter region, the mechanism behind this induction is as yet unclear.

Identification of novel regulatory targets for Cuf1p and Fep1p

The genes induced during copper and iron starvation represent putative novel target genes for the transcription factors Cuf1p and Fep1p, respectively. However, these expression changes can also be the result of additional regulatory mechanisms, given the involvement of copper and iron in several metabolic pathways [53]. We therefore searched for Cuf1p and Fep1p binding motifs upstream of 11 genes that were upregulated in low-copper conditions and 32 genes that were upregulated in low-iron conditions (Additional data file 1 [Supplementary tables 1A and 2A]). Seven genes contained one or more copies of the CuSE binding motif, which may reflect direct regulation by Cuf1p (Figure 3). Putative Fep1p binding motifs were found in 21 genes, including five out of the six genes encoding previously identified Fep1p targets (fip1, frp1, fio1, str1, and str3; Figure 3) [41]. Most of these genes contain multiple putative Fep1p binding sites, although it has been shown that only one of these motifs is sufficient to confer iron dependent regulation by Fep1p [42].

Figure 3
figure 3

Novel target genes for Fep1p and Cuf1p. The expression of genes induced during copper and iron starvation and containing one or more putative Cuf1p and Fep1p binding motifs in an 800 base pair promotor region was evaluated by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in strains deleted for either Cuf1p or Fep1p. The fold change in target gene expression in fep1-Δ and cuf1-Δ mutants is shown relative to a wild-type control. The deletion strains were grown in yeast extract (YE) medium, with or without copper or iron chelator added as indicated (± BCS, with or without addition of 100 μmol/l bathocuproinedisulphonate; ± FZ, with or without addition of 300 μmol/l ferrozine). Wild-type control strains were grown in YE medium without metal chelator. Averaged fold changes were obtained by qPCR for two biologic replicates, assayed in duplicate. Significant expression changes (P ≤ 0.05) determined in a two-sided Student's t test are indicated by asterisks. High confidence transcription factor target genes are indicated in red; previously known targets are shown in bold. The maximum observed fold change during the microarray time course, as determined from averaged replicates, is shown in comparison. aValue obtained by quantitative real-time PCR.

The role of Fep1p and Cuf1p in regulating the putative novel target genes was further evaluated by examination of the expression levels of these genes in cuf1-Δ and fep1-Δ mutants using qPCR (Figure 3). For this purpose, the deletion strains and a wild-type control were grown in yeast extract (YE) rather than Edinburgh minimal medium (EMM) medium, because cuf1-Δ and fep1-Δ growth was found to be impaired in the latter medium [42]. Genes were considered valid Cuf1p targets when they exhibited a significant (P ≤ 0.05) and greater than 1.5-fold decrease in expression relative to the wild-type control. The same cut-offs were used to identify putative Fep1p targets, with the exception that induced genes were considered instead, which is consistent with the role of Fep1p as a repressor. We further subjected the cuf1-Δ and fep1-Δ mutants to conditions of copper and iron deprivation, respectively. The absence of significant additional expression changes relative to standard conditions (Figure 3) confirms that the observed target gene regulation is indeed conferred by the copper or iron responsive transcription factors, as opposed to indirect effects related to a reduction in metal availability.

Based on our stringency cut-offs, we can identify two novel Cuf1p targets, namely pex7 and SPAC3G6.05, both of which are predicted to encode peroxisomal proteins. This strongly suggests a role for this organelle in S. pombe copper homeostasis, perhaps linked to its function in reactive oxygen species metabolism [54]. Consistent with previous observations [43], frp1 and str1 were significantly induced in the cuf1-Δ mutants. This probably results from a secondary iron starvation in S. pombe and is further discussed below.

The eight novel regulatory targets for Fep1p exhibit a clear functional link to iron metabolism. The genes sib1 and sib2 both encode proteins that were previously implicated in siderophore biosynthesis [55], and our findings confirm that S. pombe induces production of siderophores in iron limiting conditions. The expression of isu1 points to a link to iron-sulfur biosynthesis, which may further involve the sulfiredoxin Srx1p. SPBC947.05c is predicted to have ferric-chelate reductase activity based on sequence similarity, and it is expected to play a role in iron reduction before uptake, analogous to Frp1p. The role of the remaining proteins (Rds1p, SPAC1F8.02c, and SPBC27B12.03c) in iron homeostasis is currently unclear. The considerable induction of SPAC1F8.02c, greater than that for all previously identified Fep1p targets, indicates that this glycoprotein plays an important role in iron uptake.

S. pomberesponds to high copper levels with a general stress response

Exposure of fission yeast to limited copper stress (2 μmol/l CuSO4) resulted in a rapid (within 15-30 min) but transient transcriptional response involving 93 genes (Figure 2c and Additional data file 1 [Supplementary table 3]). When copper levels were increased to 25 μmol/l CuSO4, this number rose dramatically to 1,259 genes, and the expression changes persisted for the 2-hour time course, reaching a plateau after 30 min (Figure 2c). The size of the response suggests additional cell stress at these copper levels and is likely to result from secondary effects of elevated copper levels. Considering that S. pombe is able to sustain growth in copper concentrations up to 10 mmol/l [56] and that growth rate was not impaired compared with standard conditions (data not shown), the observed expression changes indicate a physiologic response to copper rather than cytotoxic effects. We focused on the genes that were also differentially expressed in the limited copper experiment, because they were the first to respond to high-copper stress and are therefore more likely to represent direct copper-specific regulation.

The global character of the S. pombe gene expression response to medium and high copper levels is in stark contrast to the limited expression changes found in S. cerevisiae cells treated with copper (Figure 2c). Notably, the changes in fission yeast already occur at much lower levels of copper (2 μmol/l versus 8 μmol/l). The genes that are induced by high copper levels are involved in a variety of functions (Table 1). As expected, these include antioxidants with an established role in heavy metal detoxification such as glutathione S-transferase (SPAC688.04c and SPCC965.07c), thioredoxin (SPBC12D12.07c and trx2), zinc metallothionein (zym1), and superoxide dismutase (sod1).

Interestingly, a number of iron uptake genes, including frp1, str1, and fip1, were induced in response to high copper (Figures 1 and 2c), which is consistent with previous findings [43]. A small and transient induction of iron metabolism genes was also observed in budding yeast, peaking after a 30 min exposure to 8 μmol/l CuSO4 (Figure 2c). The same group, however, is also known to be upregulated in response to other stressors such as cadmium or hydrogen peroxide, with the exception of fip1, which is downregulated [47]. Regulation of these genes may therefore be the result of general stress and unrelated to copper metabolism. Another possible explanation for the induction of iron regulon genes is that excess copper triggers iron starvation by competing with iron uptake. It is known that the low-affinity Fet4p iron transporter in S. cerevisiae can be inhibited by elevated concentrations of cobalt and cadmium [57]. Fet4p and its S. pombe ortholog (SPBP26C9.03c) may well be similarly affected by copper.

A large proportion of the genes (41%) exhibiting changes in high copper are part of the core environmental stress response (CESR) [47], which is known to be activated in response to several distinct stress conditions (Figure 2c). The major conserved regulators of this general stress response in S. pombe that have been identified to date are the Sty1p kinase and the transcription factor Atf1p. Sty1p is turned on as part of a mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade by a variety of stressors [5862]. The resulting transcriptional changes are effected, at least in part, by Atf1p, which is phosporylated by Sty1p [6367]. The majority of the induced CESR genes were indeed part of the set of known Sty1p or Atf1p regulated genes (27 out of 38) [47], suggesting an important role for these proteins in the regulation of at least part of the response to high copper.

Considerable overlap was also found with genes previously described to be induced in response to the heavy metal cadmium [47], and almost all of the genes expressed in response to high copper were also induced by cadmium (data not shown). In particular, genes involved in the sulfur amino acid biosynthetic pathway (Table 1 and Additional data file 1 [Supplementary table 3A]), which is required for both glutathione and phytochelatin synthesis, were upregulated in both experiments. Expression of the S. pombe phytochelatin synthase itself (SPAC3H1.10) could not be determined because it did not produce measurable signals at most time points.

Our results further underscore the general nature of the S. pombe response to high copper, even when only a relatively small subset of genes that reacted early to copper stress is considered. From comparisons with previous microarray experiments in S. pombe subjected to environmental stresses [47], however, we can identify a small subset of genes that are specifically downregulated in response to high copper (ptr2, SPBC13A2.04c, SPAP7G5.06, SPAC5H10.01, SPCC132.04c, SPCC1223.09, SPAC11D3.18c, SPAC11D3.15, and SPAC1039.08). Most of these genes are involved in amino acid metabolism.

S. cerevisiaecannot compensate for the loss of Ace1p with a general stress response

Wild-type S. cerevisiae is protected from copper stress by the presence of metallothioneins; when copper concentration increases, induction of metallothionein synthesis is sufficient to neutralize the toxic effect of the metal and prevent oxidative stress. This can be inferred from absence of additional stress induced genes in the S. cerevisiae response to high copper levels [19] (Figure 2c). When metallothionein synthesis cannot be initiated (for example, because of lack of the transcription factor responsible for their activation, as in an ace1-Δ strain), free copper can exert its toxic effect on cellular components, leading to reduced tolerance to high copper [68]. Because S. pombe responds to metal accumulation by initiating a general stress response, we were interested to determining whether S. cerevisiae has retained the ability to induce a similar response in the absence of the specific high-copper detoxification system.

Although deletion of ACE1 resulted in a drastic increase in the number of genes that respond to copper stress (212 versus 50 in wild-type cells) as well as the magnitude of their changes (Additional data file 1 [Supplementary table 4]), there were significant differences in the types of genes regulated (Figure 4). Only 6% of the differentially expressed genes were orthologous to the CESR group (named ESR/CER in S. cerevisiae), which accounts for 41% of the S. pombe response to high copper. Even when considering all genes of the S. cerevisiae ESR/CER [48, 69], this number increases only slightly to 8%. We also directly compared the fission yeast genes induced by high copper levels in the wild-type with those induced in budding yeast ace1-Δ, and we found that only 18 orthologous genes were differentially expressed in both experiments.

Figure 4
figure 4

S. cerevisiae ace1-Δ mutants fail to induce a core environmental stress response in response to high copper. (a) Transcriptional response of S. cerevisiae ace1-Δ mutants to excess copper (8 μmol/l CuSO4). (b) Venn diagrams showing the overlap between differentially expressed genes in the ace1-Δ mutants (Figure 3a), and clusters of genes that are orthologs to the core environmental stress response in fission yeast, or known to be regulated in response to copper or iron. Venn diagrams and transcriptional profiles are colored as in Figure 2.

Two major classes of genes were induced upon copper stress in ace1-Δ mutants, encoding components of the proteasome and stress response proteins (Table 2). Similar induction of proteasome related genes have been observed in response to diamide (a sulfhydryl oxidizing agent), griseofulvin (antifungal agent), and methyl methanesulfonate (a DNA damaging agent) [48, 70, 71] and may be indicative of severe stress leading to cell death. The reduction in growth rate observed for ace1-Δ mutants during the 4 hours of exposure to 8 μmol/l CuSO4 is consistent with this hypothesis. Expression of proteasome genes is also highly induced in S. pombe cells exposed to 25 μmol/l CuSO4 (data not shown). Taken together, our findings indicate that S. cerevisiae ace1-Δ mutants exhibit a different response to high copper as compared with S. pombe, and this discrepancy may be an important contributing factor to the copper hypersensitivity that has been observed in these mutants [68]. Thus, S. cerevisiae cells can only poorly compensate for the absence of metallothioneins, whereas S. pombe cells may have adapted to the lack of a CUP1 ortholog by launching a general stress response.

Table 2 Gene classes induced or repressed by 8 μmol/l CuSO4 in S. cerevisiae cup2-Δ mutants

S. cerevisiae metallothionein improves S. pombecopper tolerance

To test the possibility that expression of an exogenous metallothionein gene could reduce the fission yeast stress response after exposure to high copper levels, the budding yeast CUP1 gene was over-expressed in fission yeast. Intriguingly, genes induced in wild-type S. pombe cells in response to high copper levels were less induced in a strain over-expressing CUP1 (leu1-32 h- pREP3X-CUP1). Similar levels of induction were detected between the wild-type and the control strain over-expressing the vector only (leu1-32 h- pREP3X; Figure 5). Consistent with these findings, CUP1 over-expressing cells (but not cells over-expressing the vector only) were able to grow on EMM plates containing 0.1 mmol/l CuSO4 (data not shown). We conclude that the budding yeast CUP1 gene greatly helps fission yeast to cope with excess copper.

Figure 5
figure 5

Expression of Cup1p in S. pombe reduces the effects of high copper stress. Diagram of expression patterns in fission yeast overexpressing S. cerevisiae CUP1 or an empty control vector (EV) after exposure to 2 μmol/l CuSO4 for 30 min. The profiles for wild-type (WT) fission yeast in response to 2 and 10 μmol/l CuSO4 are shown for comparison. Data are displayed for the set of 93 genes that were differentially expressed in the 2 μmol/l CuSO4 experiment after hierarchical clustering.


The work presented in this report provides an overview of transcriptional programs of fission yeast in response to changing copper and iron levels. We identify two novel candidate genes regulated by Cuf1p and a further eight regulated by Fep1p; additional putative regulatory targets were detected with lower confidence. Our results support the view that S. pombe reacts to a variety of different stresses by activating a core set of CESR genes. Substantial overlap was found between copper and cadmium stress [47], suggesting that both metals have similar effects on S. pombe gene expression, which may be triggered by the resulting oxidative stress rather than by direct metal sensing.

The comparison between budding and fission yeast reveals conservation of relatively small, core copper and iron regulons, with a larger number of additional genes that are specific to each yeast. Of the 13 copper or iron responsive S. pombe genes with homologs in the S. cerevisiae copper and iron regulons, 10 encode proteins that are directly involved in metal uptake and trafficking (ctr4, ctr5, ctr6, fip1, fio1, frp1, str1, str3, SPBC947.05c, and SPAC8C9.12c). The function of the other three genes (SPCC11E10.01, vht1, and isu1) is less well understood, but their conserved regulation suggests an important role in metal metabolism. SPCC11E10.01 is the fission yeast counterpart to YFR055W, which encodes a protein of unknown function and has been reported as a Mac1p target in a number of microarray studies in budding yeast [1719]. The mitochondrial iron-sulfur cluster assembly protein isu1 and its ISU2 ortholog are of particular interest, because iron-sulfur cluster synthesis in the mitochondrion has been linked to iron sensing by the Rcs1p transcription factor in S. cerevisiae [72]. It is therefore tempting to speculate that these genes have a conserved regulatory role for the iron regulons of S. pombe and S. cerevisiae.

The genes that are uniquely regulated in each yeast in response to iron or copper starvation mainly encode proteins that are involved in metabolic processes that depend on these metals. When considering only validated Cuf1p and Fep1p target genes, we found possible involvement of the peroxisome in S. pombe copper homeostasis that has not been observed in S. cerevisiae. Unlike budding yeast, fission yeast has also retained the ability to induce siderophore biosynthesis genes. Finally, the presence of a number of S. pombe iron regulon genes with an as yet unknown role in iron homeostasis reflects the evolutionary divergence between the two yeasts.

Several homologs to genes that are highly induced during budding yeast iron starvation were not differentially expressed when fission yeast was subjected to similar conditions. This includes the S. pombe homolog (SPBPJ4664.02) to the S. cerevisiae FIT1, FIT2, and FIT3 genes, which encode proteins that are believed to trap iron in the cell wall. It is therefore unlikely that a similar mechanism exists in fission yeast. The fission yeast ortholog to the S. cerevisiae Ccc2p ATPase was not picked up as differentially expressed in iron deprived conditions, but only failed to reach our threshold by a narrow margin.

In response to copper deprivation, we found that frp1 and str1 are upregulated, suggesting a positive link between copper and iron metabolism in S. pombe similar to that in S. cerevisiae. This differs from previous data, which suggested that frp1, as well as fip1 and fio1, were repressed in a Cuf1p-dependent manner [43] (Figure 6a). This repression has been proposed to occur by direct binding of Cuf1p to TTTGTC motifs in the promoter region of these genes, as suggested by the observation that iron metabolism genes are induced in cuf1-Δ mutants, as well as by mutagenesis studies of the TTTGTC motifs [43]. Although these findings seem contradictory, the currently established role of Cuf1p as a transcriptional activator of high affinity copper transporters [38, 49], together with the identification of DNA motifs that confer Fep1p regulation on the iron metabolism genes [42], now allow for an alternative interpretation of the previous results and are consistent with our findings.

Figure 6
figure 6

An updated model for transcriptional regulation by Cuf1p and Fep1p. (a) Previously proposed mechanism for Cuf1p-dependent repression of iron uptake genes [43]. (b) Revised model of Cuf1p and Fep1p regulation in S. pombe, including novel regulatory targets. Details are given in the text.

The CuSE elements (GCTGA/T) that confer Cuf1p dependent activation for ctr4, ctr5, and ctr6 [49] are different from the TTTGTC motifs that are believed to be responsible for copper mediated repression of iron metabolism genes. Instead, the CuSEs identified in S. pombe are similar to the S. cerevisiae Ace1p binding motifs [73]. Moreover, the DNA binding domain of Cuf1p closely resembles that of Ace1p in S. cerevisiae, and a chimerical Cuf1p protein with an Ace1p DNA binding domain can complement a cuf1-Δ null mutant [38]. In the absence of additional DNA binding domains, it seems unlikely that Cuf1p would bind both the CuSE and TTTGTC motifs during copper starvation and simultaneously function as a transcriptional activator and repressor.

The proposed role of the TTTGTC motifs in negative regulation of iron metabolism genes has been further supported by mutagenesis studies in a 271 base pair fragment of the fip1 promoter [43]. Mutations in two out of three TTTGTC motifs encompassed by this fragment abolished the apparent copper dependent repression of a reporter construct. Interestingly, a re-examination of this promoter fragment reveals that one of the TTTGTC motifs is located between two Fep1p binding sites, and mutation of this motif also alters two residues that are conserved between the Fep1p motifs in the fip1 and frp1 promoters (Figure 7). It is therefore likely that the induction of the reporter construct in the mutant resulted from the loss of Fep1p rather than Cuf1p regulation.

Figure 7
figure 7

Proximity of TTTGTC motifs to Fep1p binding sites in the fip1 promoter. The 500 base pair (bp) region upstream of the fip1 open reading frame contains three TTTGTC motifs (closed rectangles) [43] and two Fep1p binding sites (open rectangles) [42]. A third Fep1p binding motif is found further upstream, but its role in Fep1p mediated regulation is unknown. Horizontal arrows indicate the 271 bp promoter fragment used previously [43] to study the effects of mutations in two of the TTTGTC motifs (asterisks). The area encompassing the two known Fep1p binding sites and the most distal mutated TTTGTC motif is shown enlarged to illustrate their proximity. Sequence residues that are conserved between the fip1 and frp1 promoters are shaded gray [42]. The vertical separator indicates the 3' end of the 271 bp promoter fragment.

Taken together, the data above argue against a role for Cuf1p in repression of the iron metabolism genes frp1, fip1, and fio1. Instead, the minor induction of the iron uptake system during copper deprivation (as identified in the present study) and the strong induction in cuf1-Δ mutants [43] (Figure 3) points to a link between copper and iron metabolism similar to that in S. cerevisiae, in which copper starvation leads to delayed induction of the complete iron regulon as a result of a secondary iron starvation [19]. It is tempting to speculate that frp1 is also directly involved in copper metabolism, by binding of Cuf1p to the CuSE elements identified in its promoter region (Figure 3). This model would be in accordance with the situation in S. cerevisiae, in which copper uptake by the Ctr1p and Ctr3p transporters depends on the Frp1p homologs Fre1p and Fre2p [7, 8], both of which are induced as part of the copper regulon [7, 8, 20, 21]. Although other ferric reductase homologs exist in S. pombe, none of these are induced upon copper starvation. An updated model for Cuf1p and Fep1p regulation in S. pombe, including novel validated target genes, is presented in Figure 6b. The relative minor induction of the iron uptake system during the time of copper depletion assayed here could indicate that S. pombe contains larger iron stores than does S. cerevisiae, because the copper and iron concentrations in the synthetic media used to grow the two yeasts were identical. Alternatively, it could reflect a reduced demand for iron in S. pombe compared with S. cerevisiae, perhaps linked to the slower growth rate of the former.

The global transcriptional response to excess copper in S. pombe differs greatly from the highly specific detoxification mechanism adopted by S. cerevisiae [19] (Figure 2c). The limited response favored by S. cerevisiae is more efficient and conserves energy that would otherwise be used to synthesize the large number of proteins needed to protect the cell from oxidative stress. Interestingly, the response of budding yeast to other stressors such as hydrogen peroxide and heat shock results in the induction of a global stress response similar to that in S. pombe [48, 69]. The difference in the characteristics of copper response in S. cerevisiae is in accordance with the belief that it uniquely evolved to deal with high levels of copper found in its environment.

A remaining question is how is the S. pombe response to excess copper regulated? Fission yeast utilizes several mechanisms for the sequestration of heavy metals, such as phytochelatin synthase, glutathione synthesis, and the metallothionein Zym1p. Although a previous study suggested that the role of Zym1p is limited to zinc metabolism [46], expression of its gene is increased in response to a number of other stresses as well [47], and we also found its induction to be more than twofold greater in high copper conditions (Figure 1). In contrast to budding yeast, however, we found that these detoxification systems cannot prevent the upregulation of a large number of additional stress response genes (Table 1 and Figure 2c).

There are two possible explanations for this difference. One is that the response to copper is nonspecific and purely regulated by general mechanisms that indirectly sense the effects of copper toxicity such as oxidative stress. An alternative explanation is that a specific response to detoxify excess copper exists, but it is not sufficient to prevent oxidative damage, resulting in an additional stress response. A number of observations suggest that the former model is more likely. First, the response to excess copper is similar to cadmium stress, suggesting that they are triggered by the same mechanism. A large number of the differentially expressed genes are known to be regulated by Sty1p and Atf1p, both of which are responsive to a wide variety of stressors [47], arguing against a unique role for copper. Further evidence comes from the timing of the transient response to low levels of copper, which is consistent with the response to other S. pombe stresses [47] and does not appear to be preceded by any specific response (Figure 2c). Two predicted glutathione S-transferases (SPAC688.04c and SPCC965.07c), as well as zym1, are upregulated simultaneously with other stress response genes, suggesting that putative metal scavenging systems are induced as part of the same response. Phytochelatin synthase expression could not reliably be measured on the arrays and experiments are currently underway to determine whether it is also induced together with the rest of the stress response. Our finding of a small number of genes specifically repressed during copper stress shows that some elements of the response may still be unique to copper, although regulation in these genes may be related to the toxic effects of copper rather than a copper dependent transcription factor.

Concentrations of free copper in S. cerevisiae are normally kept at less than one atom per cell [74]. In the absence of metallothionein expression, the buffering capacity for copper is greatly reduced, raising intracellular copper levels and causing toxicity. Interestingly, we found that ace1-Δ mutants subjected to excess copper do not induce a common environmental stress response, which is normally found when budding yeast is faced with an oxidative stress such as hydrogen peroxide [48, 69]. This suggests that S. cerevisiae is unable to mount an alternative response to compensate for the oxidative stress triggered by copper in the absence of ACE1, giving a possible explanation for the previously described hypersensitivity to copper in these mutants [68]. Alternatively, the toxic effects of copper may be mediated by other mechanisms, such as displacement of similar trace metals (for example, zinc) from their physiologic binding sites, which become apparent before copper levels are sufficiently high to cause free radical stress. One way to test this would be to check whether the oxidative response to a small dose of hydrogen peroxide reduces copper hypersensitivity in ace1-Δ mutants. The phenomenon that a moderate response to one stressor can provide increased resistance to other types of stress is known as cross-protection [75, 76]. Cross protection between copper or hydrogen peroxide induced stresses is only expected to occur if oxidative damage is the main reason for copper toxicity.


Our comparisons between budding and fission yeast reveal that their considerable evolutionary distance has resulted in substantial differences in the regulation of copper and iron homeostasis. Despite these differences, the regulation of a core set of genes involved in the uptake of these metals remains conserved and provides valuable clues to key features of metal metabolism, as demonstrated by the putative regulation of frp1 by copper and iron in both yeasts. Genome wide comparisons are therefore useful to gain insight into the extent of conserved mechanisms between different species and can help to reveal the plasticity and adaptation of different aspects of cellular physiology.

Materials and methods

Strains, culture conditions and RNA isolation

For the experiments in S. pombe, we used the wild-type strain 972 h-, as well as the leu1-32 h- pREP3X-CUP1 strain, which over-expresses the S. cerevisiae CUP1 metallothionein gene from a plasmid under the regulatable nmt1 promoter [77]. The over-expression strain was constructed in this study using a pair of specific primers (CUP1-FWD: 5'-CTCGAGATGTTCAGCGAATTA-3'; and CUP1-REV: 5'-CGTTTCATTTCCCAGAGCAGC-3') and a two-step cloning procedure, as previously described [78]. Standard methods [79] were used to culture S. pombe cells in liquid Edinburgh minimal medium (EMM) at 30°C, with shaking at 170 rpm.

For validating the putative S. pombe Cuf1p and Fep1p targets, we used the following strains: wild-type FY435 (h+ his7-366 leu1-32 ura418 ade6-M210), the cuf1-Δ disruption strain (h+ his7-366 leu1-32 ura418 ade6-M210 cuf11Δ::ura4), and the fep1-Δ disruption strain (h+ his7-366 leu1-32 ura418 ade6-M210 fep1Δ::ura4). All strains were grown in YE at 30°C.

The S. cerevisiae ace1-Δ mutant (MATa; met15; ura3; his3 1; leu2) was obtained from the Saccharomyces deletion project (Research Genetics, part of Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) [80] and grown in synthetic complete (SC) medium supplemented with 2% glucose (Qbiogene, Irvine, CA, USA). Basal copper (CuSO4) and iron (FeCl2) levels were identical in both media, as defined by the manufacturer.

Experimental design

Wild-type S. pombe was grown to an optical density (600 nm) of 0.15 to 0.2 before adding the stimulus, after which samples were collected at regular intervals, depending on the experiment. Cells were harvested by filtration and pellets immediately frozen on dry ice.

The high copper experiment in S. pombe was performed three times independently, using different final concentrations of CuSO4, namely 2, 10 and 25 μmol/l, and collecting at 0, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min. Conditions of low copper or low iron were induced, respectively, by either adding the copper chelator BCS (Sigma) to a final concentration of 100 μmol/l or the iron chelator ferrozine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) to a concentration of 300 μmol/l. The low copper experiment was independently repeated three times, whereas the low iron experiment was performed once. All samples were hybridized onto microarrays together with a reference from untreated wild-type cells from the same experiment (time 0).

The S. pombe cuf1-Δ and fep1-Δ experiments were performed twice independently, testing the following experimental conditions: wild-type FY435 untreated, wild-type FY435 100 μmol/l BCS and wild-type FY435 300 μmol/l ferrozine; cuf1-Δ untreated and cuf1-Δ 100 μmol/l BCS; and fep1-Δ untreated and fep1-Δ 300 μmol/l ferrozine. Cells were harvested 180 min after stimulus addition together with the untreated samples grown in parallel.

For the CUP1 over-expression experiment in S. pombe, cells were grown for 2 days in EMM without thiamine for steady-state induction of the nmt1 promoter. CuSO4 was added to a final concentration of 2 μmol/l, and cells were collected after 30 min. Cells carrying the pREP3X control vector were treated in the same way and used as reference. This experiment was performed once.

S. cerevisiae ace1-Δ mutants were exposed to high copper by adding CuSO4 (Sigma) to a final concentration of 8 μmol/l, and cells were collected at 0, 15, 60, 120, 180 and 240 min after addition, at an OD600 of 0.5 (corresponding to a mid-log growth phase). The experimental setup and concentrations were chosen according to the methods of van Bakel and coworkers [19] to facilitate comparison of expression profiles between the two studies. Samples for microarray analysis were harvested by centrifuging at 2000 g for 3 min, followed by snap freezing in liquid nitrogen.

cDNA labeling, microarray hybridization, and data acquisition

For S. pombe, total RNA was isolated from all experimental and reference samples using a hot phenol protocol, as previously described [81, 82]. Between 10 and 20 μg total RNA were labeled by direct incorporation of either fluorescent Cy3-dCTP or Cy5-dCTP (GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, Buckinghamshire, UK), and the fluorescently labeled product hybridized to S. pombe cDNA microarrays, as previously described [81]. Microarrays were subsequently scanned using a GenePix 4000B laser scanner (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and fluorescence intensity ratios calculated with GenePix Pro (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

For S. cerevisiae, total RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis and labeling, microarray production, and hybridization was done as described previously [83]. For each sample, 300 ng cDNA (with a specific activity of 2% to 4% dye-labeled nucleosides) was hybridized for 16 to 20 hours at 42°C. Microarray probes consisted of 70-mer oligonucleotides, and included 3,000 control features and duplicate probes for 6357 S. cerevisiae genes. Slides were scanned in an Agilent DNA Microarray Scanner (model G2565BA; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Spot quantification was carried out using Imagene 4.0 (Biodiscovery, El Segundo, CA, USA).

The entire raw dataset is available from the ArrayExpress database [84], accession number E-TABM-120.

Microarray data analysis

Normalization of the S. pombe microarray data was performed using an in-house script [81]. The S. cerevisiae data were normalized by applying a Lowess function per subgrid on all gene spots [85], using the marrayNorm R package v1.1.3 [86]. Genes for which more than 50% of data points were missing were discarded from further analysis in both datasets.

Genes were considered differentially expressed in the high copper experiment when they exhibited a greater than 1.5-fold change at at least one time point after stimulation with 2 μmol/l CuSO4 and at least a similar change in response to 25 μmol/l CuSO4. In the low copper experiment, genes induced or repressed by more than 1.5-fold at at least one time point in two out of three biologic repeats were selected. Similar cutoffs were used for the low iron (300 μmol/l ferrozine) and the high copper (8 μmol/l CuSO4) experiments in S. cerevisiae ace1-Δ mutants, selecting genes that were induced or repressed by at least 1.5-fold at one or more time points. Hierarchical clustering was done in Genespring 6.1 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Genes were assigned to functional classes according to the Gene Ontology consortium database [87].

Comparison with data from S. cerevisiae

Raw data and lists of S. cerevisiae copper regulated genes were obtained from the report by Van Bakel and coworkers [19]. Genes with a prospective S. pombe ortholog were determined using a table of curated orthologs as previously described [88] or by best reciprocal hit BLAST analysis [89]. The total number of curated orthologs available at the time of the analysis was 3,655. If an S. pombe ortholog to an S. cerevisiae gene could not be identified based on the above criteria, we instead used the BLAST algorithm [89] to select the most similar S. pombe sequences for our interspecies comparisons of copper metabolism. The best matching hits in S. pombe with an e value less than 1 × e-20 and a minimum match length of 80% were selected as putative functional homologs.

Analysis of transcription factor binding motifs

DNA regulatory patterns were derived from manual alignments of experimentally confirmed binding motifs and determined as KYWGATAW (K = G/T, Y = C/T, and W = A/T) for Fep1p [41, 42] and WNNNGCTGD (W = A/T, N = any, and D = G/A/T) for Cuf1p [36, 37, 90]. These patterns were subsequently used to search for putative novel binding sites in the 800 base pair region upstream of the transcriptional start site of genes induced in low copper or low iron conditions. When necessary, upstream regions were truncated to prevent overlap with other open reading frames. Both the retrieval of upstream sequences and pattern matching were done at the Regulatory Sequence Analysis Tools website [91].

Quantitative real-time PCR

Putative novel S. pombe targets for Cuf1p and Fep1p were validated by quantitative real-time PCR in cuf1-Δ and fep1-Δ disruption strains. Total RNA was isolated as previously described [81], treated with Turbo DNase (Ambion, Foster City, CA, USA) in order to remove any genomic DNA contamination, and reverse transcribed using random hexamers and Omniscript RT Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, Limburg, The Netherlands), in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Expression levels were quantified by using SYBR GreenER qPCR Supermix ABI PRISM (Invitrogen) on an Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA, USA) 7300 Real-Time PCR System and normalized using act1 expression levels as a reference. Primer sequences used are available as supplementary data (Additional data file 2 [Supplementary table 5]).

Additional data files

The following additional data are available with the online version of this paper. Additional data file 1 includes tables providing details on all genes induced or repressed in the experimental conditions assayed here. Additional data file 2 includes a table summarizing the sequences of all qPCR primers used.


  1. 1.

    Piskur J, Langkjaer RB: Yeast genome sequencing: the power of comparative genomics. Mol Microbiol. 2004, 53: 381-389. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04182.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Stein L: Genome annotation: from sequence to biology. Nat Rev Genet. 2001, 2: 493-503. 10.1038/35080529.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Prohaska JR, Gybina AA: Intracellular copper transport in mammals. J Nutr. 2004, 134: 1003-1006.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Askwith C, Kaplan J: Iron and copper transport in yeast and its relevance to human disease. Trends Biochem Sci. 1998, 23: 135-138. 10.1016/S0968-0004(98)01192-X.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Wood V, Gwilliam R, Rajandream MA, Lyne M, Lyne R, Stewart A, Sgouros J, Peat N, Hayles J, Baker S, et al: The genome sequence of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nature. 2002, 415: 871-880. 10.1038/nature724.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kampfenkel K, Kushnir S, Babiychuk E, Inze D, Van Montagu M: Molecular characterization of a putative Arabidopsis thaliana copper transporter and its yeast homologue. J Biol Chem. 1995, 270: 28479-28486. 10.1074/jbc.270.47.28479.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Georgatsou E, Mavrogiannis LA, Fragiadakis GS, Alexandraki D: The yeast Fre1p/Fre2p cupric reductases facilitate copper uptake and are regulated by the copper-modulated Mac1p activator. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 13786-13792. 10.1074/jbc.272.21.13786.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Hassett R, Kosman DJ: Evidence for Cu(II) reduction as a component of copper uptake by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1995, 270: 128-134. 10.1074/jbc.270.1.128.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Jungmann J, Reins HA, Lee J, Romeo A, Hassett R, Kosman D, Jentsch S: MAC1, a nuclear regulatory protein related to Cu-dependent transcription factors is involved in Cu/Fe utilization and stress resistance in yeast. EMBO J. 1993, 12: 5051-5056.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Yamaguchi-Iwai Y, Serpe M, Haile D, Yang W, Kosman DJ, Klausner RD, Dancis A: Homeostatic regulation of copper uptake in yeast via direct binding of MAC1 protein to upstream regulatory sequences of FRE1 and CTR1. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 17711-17718. 10.1074/jbc.272.28.17711.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Zhu Z, Labbe S, Pena MM, Thiele DJ: Copper differentially regulates the activity and degradation of yeast Mac1 transcription factor. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 1277-1280. 10.1074/jbc.273.3.1277.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    De Freitas J, Wintz H, Kim JH, Poynton H, Fox T, Vulpe C: Yeast, a model organism for iron and copper metabolism studies. Biometals. 2003, 16: 185-197. 10.1023/A:1020771000746.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Pufahl RA, Singer CP, Peariso KL, Lin SJ, Schmidt PJ, Fahrni CJ, Culotta VC, Penner-Hahn JE, O'Halloran TV: Metal ion chaperone function of the soluble Cu(I) receptor Atx1. Science. 1997, 278: 853-856. 10.1126/science.278.5339.853.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Askwith C, Eide D, Van Ho A, Bernard PS, Li L, Davis-Kaplan S, Sipe DM, Kaplan J: The FET3 gene of S. cerevisiae encodes a multicopper oxidase required for ferrous iron uptake. Cell. 1994, 76: 403-410. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90346-8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Spizzo T, Byersdorfer C, Duesterhoeft S, Eide D: The yeast FET5 gene encodes a FET3-related multicopper oxidase implicated in iron transport. Mol Gen Genet. 1997, 256: 547-556.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Stearman R, Yuan DS, Yamaguchi-Iwai Y, Klausner RD, Dancis A: A permease-oxidase complex involved in high-affinity iron uptake in yeast. Science. 1996, 271: 1552-1557. 10.1126/science.271.5255.1552.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    De Freitas JM, Kim JH, Poynton H, Su T, Wintz H, Fox T, Holman P, Loguinov A, Keles S, van der Laan M, Vulpe C: Exploratory and confirmatory gene expression profiling of mac1Delta. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 4450-4458. 10.1074/jbc.M212308200.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gross C, Kelleher M, Iyer VR, Brown PO, Winge DR: Identification of the copper regulon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by DNA microarrays. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 32310-32316. 10.1074/jbc.M005946200.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    van Bakel H, Strengman E, Wijmenga C, Holstege FC: Gene expression profiling and phenotype analyses of S. cerevisiae in response to changing copper reveals six genes with new roles in copper and iron metabolism. Physiol Genomics. 2005, 22: 356-367. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00055.2005.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Dancis A, Roman DG, Anderson GJ, Hinnebusch AG, Klausner RD: Ferric reductase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: molecular characterization, role in iron uptake, and transcriptional control by iron. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992, 89: 3869-3873. 10.1073/pnas.89.9.3869.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Georgatsou E, Alexandraki D: Two distinctly regulated genes are required for ferric reduction, the first step of iron uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1994, 14: 3065-3073.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Georgatsou E, Alexandraki D: Regulated expression of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Fre1p/Fre2p Fe/Cu reductase related genes. Yeast. 1999, 15: 573-584. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199905)15:7<573::AID-YEA404>3.0.CO;2-7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Heymann P, Ernst JF, Winkelmann G: Identification of a fungal triacetylfusarinine C siderophore transport gene (TAF1) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a member of the major facilitator superfamily. Biometals. 1999, 12: 301-306. 10.1023/A:1009252118050.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Heymann P, Ernst JF, Winkelmann G: Identification and substrate specificity of a ferrichrome-type siderophore transporter (Arn1p) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000, 186: 221-227. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09108.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Heymann P, Ernst JF, Winkelmann G: A gene of the major facilitator superfamily encodes a transporter for enterobactin (Enb1p) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biometals. 2000, 13: 65-72. 10.1023/A:1009250017785.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lesuisse E, Simon-Casteras M, Labbe P: Siderophore-mediated iron uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae : the SIT1 gene encodes a ferrioxamine B permease that belongs to the major facilitator superfamily. Microbiology. 1998, 144 (Pt 12): 3455-3462.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Yun CW, Tiedeman JS, Moore RE, Philpott CC: Siderophore-iron uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Identification of ferrichrome and fusarinine transporters. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 16354-16359. 10.1074/jbc.M001456200.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Yamaguchi-Iwai Y, Dancis A, Klausner RD: AFT1: a mediator of iron regulated transcriptional control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1995, 14: 1231-1239.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Yamaguchi-Iwai Y, Stearman R, Dancis A, Klausner RD: Iron-regulated DNA binding by the AFT1 protein controls the iron regulon in yeast. EMBO J. 1996, 15: 3377-3384.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Blaiseau PL, Lesuisse E, Camadro JM: Aft2p, a novel iron-regulated transcription activator that modulates, with Aft1p, intracellular iron use and resistance to oxidative stress in yeast. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 34221-34226. 10.1074/jbc.M104987200.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Gralla EB, Thiele DJ, Silar P, Valentine JS: ACE1, a copper-dependent transcription factor, activates expression of the yeast copper, zinc superoxide dismutase gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991, 88: 8558-8562. 10.1073/pnas.88.19.8558.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Jensen LT, Howard WR, Strain JJ, Winge DR, Culotta VC: Enhanced effectiveness of copper ion buffering by CUP1 metallothionein compared with CRS5 metallothionein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 18514-18519. 10.1074/jbc.271.31.18514.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Winge DR, Nielson KB, Gray WR, Hamer DH: Yeast metallothionein. Sequence and metal-binding properties. J Biol Chem. 1985, 260: 14464-14470.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Buchman C, Skroch P, Welch J, Fogel S, Karin M: The CUP2 gene product, regulator of yeast metallothionein expression, is a copper-activated DNA-binding protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1989, 9: 4091-4095.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Welch J, Fogel S, Buchman C, Karin M: The CUP2 gene product regulates the expression of the CUP1 gene, coding for yeast metallothionein. EMBO J. 1989, 8: 255-260.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Bellemare DR, Shaner L, Morano KA, Beaudoin J, Langlois R, Labbe S: Ctr6, a vacuolar membrane copper transporter in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 46676-46686. 10.1074/jbc.M206444200.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Beaudoin J, Labbe S: The fission yeast copper-sensing transcription factor Cuf1 regulates the copper transporter gene expression through an Ace1/Amt1-like recognition sequence. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 15472-15480. 10.1074/jbc.M011256200.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Beaudoin J, Mercier A, Langlois R, Labbe S: The Schizosaccharomyces pombe Cuf1 is composed of functional modules from two distinct classes of copper metalloregulatory transcription factors. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 14565-14577. 10.1074/jbc.M300861200.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Askwith C, Kaplan J: An oxidase-permease-based iron transport system in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and its expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 401-405. 10.1074/jbc.272.1.401.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Roman DG, Dancis A, Anderson GJ, Klausner RD: The fission yeast ferric reductase gene frp1+ is required for ferric iron uptake and encodes a protein that is homologous to the gp91-phox subunit of the human NADPH phagocyte oxidoreductase. Mol Cell Biol. 1993, 13: 4342-4350.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Pelletier B, Beaudoin J, Philpott CC, Labbe S: Fep1 represses expression of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe siderophore-iron transport system. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 4332-4344. 10.1093/nar/gkg647.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Pelletier B, Beaudoin J, Mukai Y, Labbe S: Fep1, an iron sensor regulating iron transporter gene expression in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 22950-22958. 10.1074/jbc.M202682200.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Labbe S, Pena MM, Fernandes AR, Thiele DJ: A copper-sensing transcription factor regulates iron uptake genes in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 36252-36260. 10.1074/jbc.274.51.36252.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Laliberte J, Whitson LJ, Beaudoin J, Holloway SP, Hart PJ, Labbe S: The Schizosaccharomyces pombe Pccs protein functions in both copper trafficking and metal detoxification pathways. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 28744-28755. 10.1074/jbc.M403426200.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Clemens S, Kim EJ, Neumann D, Schroeder JI: Tolerance to toxic metals by a gene family of phytochelatin synthases from plants and yeast. EMBO J. 1999, 18: 3325-3333. 10.1093/emboj/18.12.3325.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Borrelly GP, Harrison MD, Robinson AK, Cox SG, Robinson NJ, Whitehall SK: Surplus zinc is handled by Zym1 metallothionein and Zhf endoplasmic reticulum transporter in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 30394-30400. 10.1074/jbc.M203145200.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Chen D, Toone WM, Mata J, Lyne R, Burns G, Kivinen K, Brazma A, Jones N, Bahler J: Global transcriptional responses of fission yeast to environmental stress. Mol Biol Cell. 2003, 14: 214-229. 10.1091/mbc.E02-08-0499.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Gasch AP, Spellman PT, Kao CM, Carmel-Harel O, Eisen MB, Storz G, Botstein D, Brown PO: Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell. 2000, 11: 4241-4257.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Zhou H, Thiele DJ: Identification of a novel high affinity copper transport complex in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 20529-20535. 10.1074/jbc.M102004200.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Puig S, Askeland E, Thiele DJ: Coordinated remodeling of cellular metabolism during iron deficiency through targeted mRNA degradation. Cell. 2005, 120: 99-110. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.032.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Wu G, Mansy SS, Wu Sp SP, Surerus KK, Foster MW, Cowan JA: Characterization of an iron-sulfur cluster assembly protein (ISU1) from Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Biochemistry. 2002, 41: 5024-5032. 10.1021/bi016073s.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Shakoury-Elizeh M, Tiedeman J, Rashford J, Ferea T, Demeter J, Garcia E, Rolfes R, Brown PO, Botstein D, Philpott CC: Transcriptional remodeling in response to iron deprivation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell. 2004, 15: 1233-1243. 10.1091/mbc.E03-09-0642.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Pena MM, Lee J, Thiele DJ: A delicate balance: homeostatic control of copper uptake and distribution. J Nutr. 1999, 129: 1251-1260.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Heiland I, Erdmann R: Biogenesis of peroxisomes. Topogenesis of the peroxisomal membrane and matrix proteins. Febs J. 2005, 272: 2362-2372. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04690.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Schrettl M, Winkelmann G, Haas H: Ferrichrome in Schizosaccharomyces pombe : an iron transport and iron storage compound. Biometals. 2004, 17: 647-654. 10.1007/s10534-004-1230-z.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Coblenz A, Wolf K: The role of glutathione biosynthesis in heavy metal resistance in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1994, 14: 303-308. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1994.tb00103.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Dix DR, Bridgham JT, Broderius MA, Byersdorfer CA, Eide DJ: The FET4 gene encodes the low affinity Fe(II) transport protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1994, 269: 26092-26099.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Degols G, Russell P: Discrete roles of the Spc1 kinase and the Atf1 transcription factor in the UV response of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Cell Biol. 1997, 17: 3356-3363.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Degols G, Shiozaki K, Russell P: Activation and regulation of the Spc1 stress-activated protein kinase in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Cell Biol. 1996, 16: 2870-2877.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Millar JB, Buck V, Wilkinson MG: Pyp1 and Pyp2 PTPases dephosphorylate an osmosensing MAP kinase controlling cell size at division in fission yeast. Genes Dev. 1995, 9: 2117-2130.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Shieh JC, Wilkinson MG, Buck V, Morgan BA, Makino K, Millar JB: The Mcs4 response regulator coordinately controls the stress-activated Wak1-Wis1-Sty1 MAP kinase pathway and fission yeast cell cycle. Genes Dev. 1997, 11: 1008-1022.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Shiozaki K, Russell P: Counteractive roles of protein phosphatase 2C (PP2C) and a MAP kinase kinase homolog in the osmoregulation of fission yeast. EMBO J. 1995, 14: 492-502.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Nguyen AN, Lee A, Place W, Shiozaki K: Multistep phosphorelay proteins transmit oxidative stress signals to the fission yeast stress-activated protein kinase. Mol Biol Cell. 2000, 11: 1169-1181.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Shiozaki K, Russell P: Conjugation, meiosis, and the osmotic stress response are regulated by Spc1 kinase through Atf1 transcription factor in fission yeast. Genes Dev. 1996, 10: 2276-2288.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Takeda T, Toda T, Kominami K, Kohnosu A, Yanagida M, Jones N: Schizosaccharomyces pombe atf1+ encodes a transcription factor required for sexual development and entry into stationary phase. EMBO J. 1995, 14: 6193-6208.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Wilkinson MG, Samuels M, Takeda T, Toone WM, Shieh JC, Toda T, Millar JB, Jones N: The Atf1 transcription factor is a target for the Sty1 stress-activated MAP kinase pathway in fission yeast. Genes Dev. 1996, 10: 2289-2301.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Yamada K, Nakagawa CW, Mutoh N: Schizosaccharomyces pombe homologue of glutathione peroxidase, which does not contain selenocysteine, is induced by several stresses and works as an antioxidant. Yeast. 1999, 15: 1125-1132. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199908)15:11<1125::AID-YEA442>3.0.CO;2-Z.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Silar P, Butler G, Thiele DJ: Heat shock transcription factor activates transcription of the yeast metallothionein gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1991, 11: 1232-1238.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Causton HC, Ren B, Koh SS, Harbison CT, Kanin E, Jennings EG, Lee TI, True HL, Lander ES, Young RA: Remodeling of yeast genome expression in response to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell. 2001, 12: 323-337.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Gasch AP, Huang M, Metzner S, Botstein D, Elledge SJ, Brown PO: Genomic expression responses to DNA-damaging agents and the regulatory role of the yeast ATR homolog Mec1p. Mol Biol Cell. 2001, 12: 2987-3003.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Savoie CJ, Aburatani S, Watanabe S, Eguchi Y, Muta S, Imoto S, Miyano S, Kuhara S, Tashiro K: Use of gene networks from full genome microarray libraries to identify functionally relevant drug-affected genes and gene regulation cascades. DNA Res. 2003, 10: 19-25. 10.1093/dnares/10.1.19.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Rutherford JC, Ojeda L, Balk J, Muhlenhoff U, Lill R, Winge DR: Activation of the iron regulon by the yeast Aft1/Aft2 transcription factors depends on mitochondrial but not cytosolic iron-sulfur protein biogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 10135-10140. 10.1074/jbc.M413731200.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Koch KA, Thiele DJ: Autoactivation by a Candida glabrata copper metalloregulatory transcription factor requires critical minor groove interactions. Mol Cell Biol. 1996, 16: 724-734.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Rae TD, Schmidt PJ, Pufahl RA, Culotta VC, O'Halloran TV: Undetectable intracellular free copper: the requirement of a copper chaperone for superoxide dismutase. Science. 1999, 284: 805-808. 10.1126/science.284.5415.805.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Jamieson DJ: Saccharomyces cerevisiae has distinct adaptive responses to both hydrogen peroxide and menadione. J Bacteriol. 1992, 174: 6678-6681.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Moradas-Ferreira P, Costa V: Adaptive response of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to reactive oxygen species: defences, damage and death. Redox Rep. 2000, 5: 277-285. 10.1179/135100000101535816.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Maundrell K: Thiamine-repressible expression vectors pREP and pRIP for fission yeast. Gene. 1993, 123: 127-130. 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90551-D.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Rustici G, Mata J, Kivinen K, Lio P, Penkett CJ, Burns G, Hayles J, Brazma A, Nurse P, Bahler J: Periodic gene expression program of the fission yeast cell cycle. Nat Genet. 2004, 36: 809-817. 10.1038/ng1377.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Moreno S, Klar A, Nurse P: Molecular genetic analysis of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods Enzymol. 1991, 194: 795-823.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Giaever G, Chu AM, Ni L, Connelly C, Riles L, Veronneau S, Dow S, Lucau-Danila A, Anderson K, Andre B, et al: Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature. 2002, 418: 387-391. 10.1038/nature00935.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Lyne R, Burns G, Mata J, Penkett CJ, Rustici G, Chen D, Langford C, Vetrie D, Bahler J: Whole-genome microarrays of fission yeast: characteristics, accuracy, reproducibility, and processing of array data. BMC Genomics. 2003, 4: 27-10.1186/1471-2164-4-27.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Fission Yeast Functional Genomics. []

  83. 83.

    van de Peppel J, Kemmeren P, van Bakel H, Radonjic M, van Leenen D, Holstege FC: Monitoring global messenger RNA changes in externally controlled microarray experiments. EMBO Rep. 2003, 4: 387-393. 10.1038/sj.embor.embor798.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    The ArrayExpress database. []

  85. 85.

    Yang YH, Dudoit S, Luu P, Lin DM, Peng V, Ngai J, Speed TP: Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30: e15-10.1093/nar/30.4.e15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, Dudoit S, Ellis B, Gautier L, Ge Y, Gentry J, et al: Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 2004, 5: R80-10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al: Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000, 25: 25-29. 10.1038/75556.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Mata J, Bahler J: Correlations between gene expression and gene conservation in fission yeast. Genome Res. 2003, 13: 2686-2690. 10.1101/gr.1420903.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 3389-3402. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Bellemare DR, Sanschagrin M, Beaudoin J, Labbe S: A novel copper-regulated promoter system for expression of heterologous proteins in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Gene. 2001, 273: 191-198. 10.1016/S0378-1119(01)00591-1.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Regulatory Sequence Analysis Tools. []

Download references


We thank Anne Farne for assistance with the ArrayExpress data submission process and Simon Labbé for S. pombe strains. Research in J Bähler's laboratory is funded by Cancer Research UK (CUK), grant no. C9546/A6517. Research by A Brazma's group was partly funded by the FELICS grant from the European Commission. H van Bakel is supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), grant nos 901-04-219 and 825-06-033.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harm van Bakel.

Additional information

Gabriella Rustici, Harm van Bakel contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material


Additional data file 1: Provided are tables presenting details on all genes induced or repressed in the experimental conditions assayed here. (PDF 449 KB)

Additional data file 2: Provided is a table summarizing the sequences of all qPCR primers used. (PDF 56 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rustici, G., van Bakel, H., Lackner, D.H. et al. Global transcriptional responses of fission and budding yeast to changes in copper and iron levels: a comparative study. Genome Biol 8, R73 (2007).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Additional Data File
  • Fission Yeast
  • High Copper
  • Copper Stress
  • Excess Copper