Skip to main content

CDetection: CRISPR-Cas12b-based DNA detection with sub-attomolar sensitivity and single-base specificity


CRISPR-based nucleic acid detection methods are reported to facilitate rapid and sensitive DNA detection. However, precise DNA detection at the single-base resolution and its wide applications including high-fidelity SNP genotyping remain to be explored. Here we develop a Cas12b-mediated DNA detection (CDetection) strategy, which shows higher sensitivity on examined targets compared with the previously reported Cas12a-based detection platform. Moreover, we show that CDetection can distinguish differences at the single-base level upon combining the optimized tuned guide RNA (tgRNA). Therefore, our findings highlight the high sensitivity and accuracy of CDetection, which provides an efficient and highly practical platform for DNA detection.


Accurate, rapid, and economical DNA detection method is of great value in clinical diagnostics and quarantine inspection. Recently, CRISPR-Cas-based DNA detection platforms, including SHERLOCK (Cas13) [1,2,3], DETECTR (Cas12a) [3, 4], and Cas14-DETECTR [5], were developed with high sensitivity and specificity. The SHERLOCK platform utilizes the RNA trans-cleavage activity of Cas13 enzymes and combines additional T7 in vitro transcription process, thereby achieving detection of RNA viruses, like Zika virus (ZIKA) and dengue virus (DENV) [2, 3, 6]. Meanwhile, through introducing synthetic mismatches in the guide sequence, this SHERLOCK strategy can discriminate SNPs in human genotyping and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) detection [2, 3, 6]. The Cas12a-DETECTR platform can detect double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) samples directly using its ability to trans-cleave single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) reporter [3, 4], yet its accuracy still requires to be improved [4]. More recently, the Cas14-DETECTR platform enables SNP detection in HERC2 gene [5]. But, Cas14 only binds and cleaves ssDNA, thus requiring an extra step to generate ssDNA from dsDNA to successfully achieve dsDNA detection [5]. Though prior CRISPR-Cas-based nucleic acid detection platforms provide us with sensitive and specific diagnostic methods [2,3,4,5,6], they still require further improvement, and new platforms with prominent features are still desired. Inspired by the ssDNA trans-cleavage activity of the Cas12b enzyme [4], we aim to develop a new dsDNA detection strategy combining with our previously reported AaCas12b enzyme [7]. Since the AaCas12b system cleaves dsDNA with high activity and specificity, we speculate that AaCas12b enables direct detection of dsDNA with high sensitivity and accuracy.

Results and discussion

To test the non-canonical trans-cleavage activity of Cas12b (Additional file 1: Figure S1a), we conducted the in vitro ssDNA cleavage assay using Cas12b, Cas12a, and Cas9 with their cognate guide RNAs (gRNAs) (Additional file 2: Table S1). The results showed that AaCas12b [7] and three Cas12a nucleases (ArCas12a, HkCas12a, and PrCas12a) [8] could induce rapid degradation of the single-stranded M13 DNA phage, while SpCas9 could not [4] (Additional file 1: Figure S1b and Additional file 2: Table S1). Meanwhile, AaCas12b and Cas12a proteins degraded M13 phage in the presence of a non-target gRNA (NT-gRNA) and its complementary ssDNA “activator” that shares no sequence homology to the M13 phage genome (Additional file 1: Figure S1c and Additional file 2: Table S1). The non-canonical collateral ssDNA cleavage activity was abolished with catalytically inactive variants, indicating a RuvC domain-dependent cleavage activity (Additional file 1: Figure S2). Collectively, these results reveal that AaCas12b-single guide RNA (sgRNA) complex can acquire RuvC domain-dependent non-specific ssDNA trans-cleavage activity once triggered by RNA-guided DNA binding.

Previous study in SHERLOCK [3] indicates that Cas12b might also exhibit biases to different homopolymeric reporters and different buffer composition. So to optimize the Cas12b-mediated DNA detection system, we next profiled the cleavage preference of AaCas12b-sgRNA complex on fluorophore quencher (FQ)-labeled homopolymer reporters. The results showed that AaCas12b preferred thymine polymer (ploy T) as well as poly A and poly C, whereas poly G could hardly be cleaved (Additional file 1: Figure S3a and Additional file 2: Table S1). Meanwhile, the cleavage efficiency could be optimized in NEBuffer™ 2 (Additional file 1: Figure S3b and Additional file 2: Table S2). Afterwards, we performed AaCas12b-mediated cleavage assay using poly T reporter in NEBuffer™ 2. Using sgRNA-complementary on-target ssDNA (OT-ssDNA) and OT-dsDNA, and sgRNA-non-complementary non-target ssDNA (NT-ssDNA) and NT-dsDNA as activators separately, we found OT-ssDNA and OT-dsDNA were able to trigger AaCas12b to cleave the FQ reporter, though OT-dsDNA activator was less efficient than OT-ssDNA (Additional file 1: Figure S3c and Additional file 2: Table S1).

We next tested the specificity of trans-cleavage activation using either ssDNA or dsDNA activators bearing various mismatches (Additional file 2: Table S1). The results showed that the PAM sequence is critical for the dsDNA activator to trigger AaCas12b trans-cleavage activity and is dispensable for the ssDNA activator, and mismatches in dsDNA rather than ssDNA would impede or even abolish the trans-cleavage activity of AaCas12b (Fig. 1a, b). Next, we determined the detection sensitivity of AaCas12b-sgRNA-activator system. Without pre-amplification, AaCas12b did not produce a detectable signal when substrate concentrations were lower than 1.6 nM for ssDNA activator and lower than 8 nM for dsDNA activator, respectively (Additional file 1: Figure S4a). Since dsDNA activator possessed a higher specificity (Fig. 1a, b), we engineered the AaCas12b-sgRNA-dsDNA-activator system as a Cas12b-based DNA detection (CDetection) platform. To explore the sensitivity of CDetection, we further synthesized one Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) dsDNA and two pairs of human papillomavirus (HPV) dsDNAs (HPV16 and HPV18, site 1 and site 2) [4] as activator for detection reaction (Additional file 2: Table S1). When the input concentration of activator is equal or greater than 10 nM, CDetection could not only produce detectable signals (Additional file 1: Figure S4b-d), but also distinguish two dsDNA viruses, HPV16 and HPV18, in identical group (Additional file 1: Figure S4c, d). Compared with Cas12a-based DNA detection, AaCas12b exhibited higher detection sensitivity than Cas12a did at both detected sites, as CDetection generated a higher signal level and a lower background level (Fig. 1c and Additional file 1: Figure S4e). To further enhance its sensitivity, we performed isothermal amplification by recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA). CDetection combined with RPA enabled substrate detection at 1 attomole (åM) (Fig. 1d and Additional file 1: Figure S4f), which shows higher sensitivity than the Cas12a-based detection platform did [3, 4] (Fig. 1e). Then we chose 12 previously reported targeting sites for comprehensive and unbiased comparison of the sensitivity between AaCas12b- and LbCas12a-based DNA detection (Additional file 2: Table S1). The averaged results (8 of 12 sites) show that CDetection platform possessed a higher sensitivity when compared with LbCas12a-based detection platform except for one site (DNMT1 site 2) and three sites (EMX1 site 2, DNMT1 site 3, and BRCA1_3232G) with poor or undetectable signals (Additional file 1: Figure S5).

Fig. 1

Specificity and sensitivity of Cas12b-mediated DNA detection. a, b (Upper) Schematics showing mismatched position in the targeting sequence. PAM sequences are colored in red, protospacers are colored in blue, SNPs are colored in pink. (Lower) Characterization of trans-cleavage activity of AaCas12b using ssDNA or dsDNA activator with indicated a single mismatch or b continuous mismatches. Error bars indicate standard errors of the mean (s.e.m.)., n = 3. RFU, relative fluorescence units; PT, perfect target; mPAM, mutated PAM. Two-tailed Student’s t test is used for significance analysis between each mutated sample and the PT sample. c Comparison of the specificity among AaCas12b, PrCas12a, and LbCas12a in dsDNA distinguishability using synthetic HPV16 activator (site 2). Error bars indicate s.e.m., n = 3. d Comparison of trans-cleavage activity and pre-amplification enhanced trans-cleavage activity (CDetection) for AaCas12b using dsDNA activator. AaCas12b is incubated with a sgRNA targeting a synthetic dsDNA 1. Error bars indicate s.e.m., n = 3. RPA, recombinase polymerase amplification. Two-tailed Student’s t test is used for significance analysis between the two samples in each group. e Maximum fluorescence signal obtained from AaCas12b-, PrCas12a-, and LbCas12a-based DNA detection with RPA pre-amplification. Cas12 proteins are incubated with their cognate guide RNA (gRNA) targeting a synthetic HPV16 dsDNA (site 2) mixed with background genome. Error bars indicate s.e.m., n = 3. Two-tailed Student’s t test is used for significance analysis among each other in the group. f Fluorescence timecourses obtained from AaCas12b- and LbCas12a-based DNA detection with RPA pre-amplification. Cas12 is incubated with a cognate gRNA targeting a synthetic HPV16 dsDNA (site 2) diluted in human plasma with a final concentration of 10−18 M. Error bars indicate s.e.m., n = 3. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ns, no significance

To explore the applications of CDetection in molecular diagnostics, we tested its feasibility in infectious virus detection. After diluting HPV dsDNAs with human genomic DNAs, we showed that CDetection could identify the diluted substrate at the sub-attomolar magnitude (0.1 åM) (Additional file 1: Figure S6a). The high sensitivity and longevity of AaCas12b in human plasma [7] then urged us to test the application of CDetection in cell-free DNA (cfDNA)-based non-invasive diagnoses. Prior SHERLOCK strategy has achieved cfDNA detection in a simulated condition [2] and using isolated samples [3], but the Cas13-based SHERLOCK requires a T7 in vitro transcription step to achieve DNA detection. To indicate the advantage of CDetection platform in cfDNA detection, we diluted HPV dsDNAs into human plasma and examined the sensitivity of this newly established method. The results showed that CDetection could directly detect the existence of HPV DNAs in human plasma at the concentration of 1 åM (Fig. 1f and Additional file 1: Figure S6b), indicating the possibility to rapidly detect infectious viruses in only one drop of blood. Together, these results demonstrate that CDetection is able to detect target DNA sequences with higher specificity and sensitivity.

To further expand the applications of CDetection in accurate diagnostics, we designed experiments using three targeting sgRNA and corresponding dsDNA activators (on- versus off-activator) to identify six common human ABO alleles [9] (Additional file 2: Table S1). Theoretically, CDetection carrying each of the three sgRNAs can identify O01, O02/O03, and B101, respectively. And if no fluorescent signal can be detected for all sgRNAs, the allele should be A101/A201 (Additional file 1: Figure S7a). Our results showed that CDetection failed to distinguish different ABO alleles as it produced indistinguishable fluorescent signals between the on- and off-dsDNA activator groups (Additional file 1: Figure S7b). To improve the specificity of CDetection, we introduced tuned guide RNA (tgRNA) containing a single-nucleotide mismatch in the spacer sequence [10], which transforms the undistinguishable state of two similar targets differed by a single base into the distinguishable state (Additional file 1: Figure S7c). To elucidate the feasibility of this enhanced CDetection, we repeated the ABO blood genotyping test. As our results indicated, CDetection with tgRNAs could determine the blood types with high accuracy in an antigen-antibody-independent and blood-free manner (Fig. 2b and Additional file 1: Figure S6c).

Fig. 2

Broad applications for CDetection. a (Left) Schematics showing the sequence variation within ABO genes and corresponding sgRNAs and tgRNAs. PAM sequences are colored in red, protospacers are colored in blue, SNPs are colored in pink, and base substitution in tgRNAs are colored in orange. (Right) CDetection combined with tgRNA achieve ABO blood genotyping detection with a single-nucleotide-resolution specificity. Error bars indicate standard errors of the mean (s.e.m.), n = 3. RFU, relative fluorescence units; tgRNA, tuned guide RNA. Two-tailed Student’s t test is used for significance analysis among each other in the group. b, c (Upper) Schematics showing the sequence variation within BRCA1 gene and targeting sgRNA and tgRNAs. (Lower) Maximum fluorescence signal showing the specificity of CDetection without RPA for human BRCA1 b 3232A>G and c 3537A>G mutation detection using sgRNA and tgRNA. Error bars indicate s.e.m., n = 3. Two-tailed Student’s t test is used for significance analysis among each other in the group. d Fluorescence timecourses showing the sensitivity and specificity of CDetection with RPA for human BRCA1 3232A>G mutation detection using tgRNA (3232-1). BRCA1 wild-type genomic DNAs or 3232A>G mutant genomic DNAs are extracted from cell lines. Error bars indicate s.e.m., n = 3. e Fluorescence timecourses showing the sensitivity and specificity of CDetection with RPA for human BRCA1 3232A>G mutation detection using tgRNA (3232-1). BRCA1 wild-type or 3232A>G dsDNAs are diluted in human plasma with a final concentration of 10−18 M. Error bars indicate s.e.m., n = 3. **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001; ns, no significance

Disease-associated point mutations were usually detected by sequencing and probe detection [11]. However, sequencing is costly and time-consuming, and its sensitivity is dependent on sequencing depth, while probe-based methods perform poor sensitivity, particularly for single-nucleotide variation [11]. We sought to use CDetection to detect single-base mutations in the human genome. We selected the cancer-related TP53 856G>A mutation to test the feasibility. The results showed that CDetection could accurately distinguish the point mutated allele from the wild-type allele using selected tgRNAs (Additional file 1: Figure S8a and Additional file 2: Table S1). Furthermore, we applied CDetection platform in detecting two hotspots in breast cancer-related BRCA1 gene (3232A>G and 3537A>G) [12]. CDetection with selected tgRNAs (tgRNA-3232-1 and tgRNA-3537-4) performed excellently to discriminate point mutations while sgRNAs could hardly support point mutation detection (Fig. 2c, d, Additional file 1: Figure S8b, c and Additional file 2: Table S1). As a proof of principle, we aimed to detect the human BRCA1 gene, which contains a SNP (3232A>G) responsible for breast cancer [12]. We amplified the BRCA1 wild-type allele and 3232A>G allele from DNAs in human breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-468 (ATCC® HTB-132™) and SUM1315MO2 (BioIVT) respectively, using the RPA amplification approach. And tgRNA-programmed CDetection achieved to discriminate the SNP with strong fluorescent signal for 3232A>G SNP while with near-background signal for the wild-type allele (Fig. 2d and Additional file 1: Figure S8d) with allelic fractions as low as 1% (Additional file 1: Figure S8e). Meanwhile, the results also indicated that the targeted genomic DNAs without pre-amplification are not able to unleash the trans-cleavage activity of Cas12b enzyme (Additional file 1: Figure S8d). And the reason is possibly that Cas12b-RNA remains tightly bound to the cleave genomic DNAs, thus failing to enable the ssDNA substrate access and turnover [4, 13]. Furthermore, to mock the early clinical detection of primary diseases using cfDNA by CDetection, we diluted BRCA1 3232A>G dsDNAs into human plasma. Our results demonstrated that CDetection could achieve point mutation detection at the single-base resolution (Fig. 2e and Additional file 1: Figure S8f). These results demonstrate that CDetection with tgRNAs is able to achieve rapid DNA detection at the single-base resolution in clinical research.

The intrinsic features of base-pairing between spacer sequences and the corresponding target sequences make CRISPR-Cas systems exist potential off-target effect as previous works indicated [7, 14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. So we assessed the possible false positive of CDetection platform using potential off-targets containing 1 to 3 mismatches in their protospacer sequences predicted from targeting sgRNAs or tgRNAs using Cas-OFFinder [23] (Additional file 2: Table S1). The results showed that both sgRNA and tgRNA exhibited mismatch tolerance pattern (Additional file 1: Figure S9a, b) consistent with above results (Fig. 1a, b) and previous studies [4]. To eliminate the off-target-associated undesired false positive of CDetection, we indicated that a specific RPA pre-amplification was necessary (Additional file 1: Figure S9c, d).

Taken together, we establish a CDetection method based on the non-canonical ssDNA trans-cleavage properties of the Cas12b nuclease triggered by targeted dsDNA, which enables DNA detection with sub-attomolar sensitivity. The CDetection strategy can perform better than the Cas12a-DETECTR in sensitivity assay. Meanwhile, the CDetection is able to detect dsDNA directly without an extra step requiring in Cas13-SHERLOCK or Cas14-DETECTR platform [2, 3, 5, 6]. Moreover, we demonstrate that CDetection enables to achieve single-nucleotide sensitivity in DNA detection coupled with optimized tgRNA, which has been applied extendedly in other CRISPR-based detection platforms [2, 6, 24]. As a proof of concept, we use mock samples composed of diluted synthetic DNA and human plasma to demonstrate the capability of CDetection to perform direct cfDNA detection. However, the detection of clinical specimens may face bigger challenges due to the poor purity and integrity. We anticipate that CDetection will be used for the detection of cfDNA in clinical specimens in the future. Besides, the intrinsic features of CRISPR-Cas systems possessing mismatch tolerance [7, 14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22] and our results indicate that RPA pre-amplification process is necessary to produce strong signal and avoid false positive for CRISPR-Cas-based nucleic acid detection platforms. During the preparation process of this manuscript, an independent study reported a less sensitive nucleic acid detection platform [25] using previously reported AacCas12b protein [4] with loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). In their works, the authors generate ssDNA using asymmetric PCR or dsDNA using LAMP as an activator to perform SNP discrimination in the tested site [25], which is different from our strategy in principle. Our work, together with the AacCas12b-based work [25], demonstrates that Cas12b-based nucleic acid detection method should be a feasible platform for molecular diagnostics. This rapid and price-competitive DNA detection platform may have wide applications in molecular diagnostics and clinical research (Additional file 1: Figure S10). For instance, we estimate that over 20,000 known human disease-associated point mutations could be detected by CDetection (Additional file 1: Figure S11).


Protein purification

SpCas9 and LbCas12a proteins were commercially purchased (NEB). AaCas12b, ArCas12a, HkCas12a, and PrCas12a proteins were purified according to our previous report [7]. Briefly, BPK2014-Cas12-His10 plasmid was transformed into E. coli strain BL21 (λDE3) and protein expression was induced with 0.5 mM IPTG at 16 °C for 16 h. Cell pellets were harvested and lysed, followed by washing and elution using His60 Ni Superflow Resin (Takara). Purified Cas12 proteins were dialyzed, concentrated, and finally quantitated using the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher).

Nucleic acid preparation

DNA oligos were commercially purchased (Genscript). Double-stranded DNA activators were obtained by PCR reaction and purified using Oligo Clean & Concentrator Kit (ZYMO Research). In order to avoid false positive results caused by target strand (TS) ssDNA, we took non-target strand (NTS) ssDNA as PCR template. PCR primers and ssDNA templates were listed in Additional file 2: Table S1.

Guide RNAs (gRNAs: sgRNAs or crRNAs) were in vitro transcribed using HiScribe™ T7 High Yield RNA Synthesis Kit (NEB) and purified using MicroElute RNA Clean Up Kit (Omega). Targeting gRNAs containing a T7 promoter were used as transcription template. AaCas12b sgRNA (AasgRNA) and SpCas9 sgRNA templates for in vitro RNA transcription were PCR amplified using primers bearing a T7 promoter (Additional file 2: Table S1). Cas12a crRNA templates were obtained by annealing oligos containing a T7 promoter (Additional file 2: Table S1).

Background genomic DNAs used in indicated reactions were crudely purified from human embryonic kidney 293T cells using Mouse Direct PCR Kit (Bimake). To mimic the cell-free DNA (cfDNA), dsDNAs were diluted into human plasma (Thermo Fisher) at indicated concentrations.

Fluorophore quencher (FQ)-labeled reporter assays

Detection assays were performed with 30 nM Cas12, 36 nM gRNA, 40 nM activator (unless otherwise indicated) mixed in 40 ng background genomic DNAs (in indicated reaction), 200 nM custom synthesized homopolymer ssDNA FQ reporter (Additional file 2: Table S1) and NEBuffer™ 2 (unless otherwise indicated) in a 20-μl reaction in a Corning® 384-well Polystyrene NBS Microplate. Reactions were incubated at 37 °C for indicated timecourse in a fluorescence plate reader (BioTek Synergy 4) with fluorescent kinetics measured every 5 min (λex = 485 nm; λem = 528 nm, transmission gain = 61). The fluorescence results were analyzed by SigmaPlot software.

Recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) reactions

Recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) reactions were proceeded using TwistAmp Basic (TwistDx) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The 50-μl RPA reaction system containing varying amounts of DNA input was incubated in 37 °C for 10 min. Sixteen microliters of RPA product was directly transferred to the 20-μl detection assay as above mentioned.

Statistical analysis

All the replicate experiments in this study consisted of three repeats. Uncertainties in the reported mean values are indicated as standard errors of the mean (s.e.m.). Statistical analysis was performed in SigmaPlot (version 12.0).

Availability of data and materials

All supporting data are included in the manuscript and supplemental files. AaCas12b/AaC2c1 expression plasmid is available from Addgene under a Uniform Biological Material Transfer Agreement.


  1. 1.

    East-Seletsky A, O’Connell MR, Knight SC, Burstein D, Cate JH, Tjian R, Doudna JA. Two distinct RNase activities of CRISPR-C2c2 enable guide-RNA processing and RNA detection. Nature. 2017;538:270–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, Lee JW, Essletzbichler P, Dy AJ, Joung J, Verdine V, Donghia N, Daringer NM, Freije CA, et al. Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR-Cas13a/C2c2. Science. 2017;356:438–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, Kellner MJ, Joung J, Collins JJ, Zhang F. Multiplexed and portable nucleic acid detection platform with Cas13, Cas12a, and Csm6. Science. 2018;360:439–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Chen JS, Ma E, Harrington LB, Da Costa M, Tian X, Palefsky JM, Doudna JA. CRISPR-Cas12a target binding unleashes indiscriminate single-stranded DNase activity. Science. 2018;360:436–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Harrington LB, Burstein D, Chen JS, Paez-Espino D, Ma E, Witte IP, Cofsky JC, Kyrpides NC, Banfield JF, Doudna JA. Programmed DNA destruction by miniature CRISPR-Cas14 enzymes. Science. 2018;362:839–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Myhrvold C, Freije CA, Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, Metsky HC, Durbin AF, Kellner MJ, Tan AL, Paul LM, Parham LA, et al. Field-deployable viral diagnostics using CRISPR-Cas13. Science. 2018;360:444–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Teng F, Cui T, Feng G, Guo L, Xu K, Gao Q, Li T, Li J, Zhou Q, Li W. Repurposing CRISPR-Cas12b for mammalian genome engineering. Cell Discov. 2018;4:63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Teng F, Li J, Cui T, Xu K, Guo L, Gao Q, Feng G, Chen C, Han D, Zhou Q, Li W. Enhanced mammalian genome editing by new Cas12a orthologs with optimized crRNA scaffolds. Genome Biol. 2019;20:15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Seltsam A, Hallensleben M, Kollmann A, Blasczyk R. The nature of diversity and diversification at the ABO locus. Blood. 2003;102:3035–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chavez A, Pruitt BW, Tuttle M, Shapiro RS, Cecchi RJ, Winston J, Turczyk BM, Tung M, Collins JJ, Church GM. Precise Cas9 targeting enables genomic mutation prevention. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:3669–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Khodakov D, Wang C, Zhang DY. Diagnostics based on nucleic acid sequence variant profiling: PCR, hybridization, and NGS approaches. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;105:3–19.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Elstrodt F, Hollestelle A, Nagel JH, Gorin M, Wasielewski M, van den Ouweland A, Merajver SD, Ethier SP, Schutte M. BRCA1 mutation analysis of 41 human breast cancer cell lines reveals three new deleterious mutants. Cancer Res. 2006;66:41–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sternberg SH, Redding S, Jinek M, Greene EC, Doudna JA. DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9. Nature. 2014;507:62–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012;337:816–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, Lin S, Barretto R, Habib N, Hsu PD, Wu X, Jiang W, Marraffini LA, Zhang F. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science. 2013;339:819–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Fu Y, Foden JA, Khayter C, Maeder ML, Reyon D, Joung JK, Sander JD. High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:822–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hsu PD, Scott DA, Weinstein JA, Ran FA, Konermann S, Agarwala V, Li Y, Fine EJ, Wu X, Shalem O, et al. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:827–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zetsche B, Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, Slaymaker IM, Makarova KS, Essletzbichler P, Volz SE, Joung J, van der Oost J, Regev A, et al. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell. 2015;163:759–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kim D, Kim J, Hur JK, Been KW, Yoon SH, Kim JS. Genome-wide analysis reveals specificities of Cpf1 endonucleases in human cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34:863–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kleinstiver BP, Tsai SQ, Prew MS, Nguyen NT, Welch MM, Lopez JM, McCaw ZR, Aryee MJ, Joung JK. Genome-wide specificities of CRISPR-Cas Cpf1 nucleases in human cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34:869–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Strecker J, Jones S, Koopal B, Schmid-Burgk J, Zetsche B, Gao L, Makarova KS, Koonin EV, Zhang F. Engineering of CRISPR-Cas12b for human genome editing. Nat Commun. 2019;10:212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Jain I, Minakhin L, Mekler V, Sitnik V, Rubanova N, Severinov K, Semenova E. Defining the seed sequence of the Cas12b CRISPR-Cas effector complex. RNA Biol. 2019;16:413–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bae S, Park J, Kim JS. Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1473–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Pardee K, Green AA, Takahashi MK, Braff D, Lambert G, Lee JW, Ferrante T, Ma D, Donghia N, Fan M, et al. Rapid, low-cost detection of Zika virus using programmable biomolecular components. Cell. 2016;165:1255–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Li L, Li S, Wang J. CRISPR-Cas12b-assisted nucleic acid detection platform. bioRxiv. 2018.

Download references

Review history

The review history is available as Additional file 3.


This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA16030400 to W.L.), the National Key Research and Development Program (2017YFA0103803 to Q. Z., 2018YFA0107703 to W.L.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31621004 to Q.Z. and W.L.), and the Key Research Projects of the Frontier Science of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDY-SSW-SMC002 to Q.Z., QYZDB-SSW-SMC022 to W.L.).

Author information




WL and QZ conceived this project and supervised the experiments. WL, QZ, FT, and LG wrote the paper with the help from all authors. WL, QZ, FT, and LG analyzed the data. FT, LG, TC, XGW, KX, and QG performed the experiments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qi Zhou or Wei Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Patent applications have been filed relating to this work, including W. L., Q. Z., and F. T. on international application no. PCT/CN2018/118457 and China application no. 201811453278.9 (nucleic acid detection method). The patents do not restrict the research use of the methods in this article for reproducibility purpose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. Non-specific DNase activity is conserved across Cas12 proteins. Figure S2. The RuvC domain is responsible for ssDNA trans-cleavage. Figure S3. Preference for Cas12b-mediated trans-activated cleavage of non-specific ssDNA. Figure S4. Sensitivity and specificity of AaCas12b-mediated DNA detection. Figure S5. Comparison of sensitivity of AaCas12b- and LbCas12a-based DNA detection. Figure S6. CDetection achieves sub-attomolar sensitivity in DNA detection. Figure S7. Develop CDetection platform. Figure S8. Accurate DNA detection using CDetection platform. Figure S9. Potential off-target analysis of CDetection. Figure S10. Rapid and accurate diagnostic applications of CDetection. Figure S11. Genetic variants from ClinVar that, in principle, can be detected by CDetection platform. (PDF 2218 kb)

Additional file 2:

Table S1. Nucleic acids used in this study. Table S2. The components of buffers tested for Cas12b-mediated DNA detection in this study. (PDF 293 kb)

Additional file 3:

Review history. (DOCX 1323 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Teng, F., Guo, L., Cui, T. et al. CDetection: CRISPR-Cas12b-based DNA detection with sub-attomolar sensitivity and single-base specificity. Genome Biol 20, 132 (2019).

Download citation