Open Access

Relationships between gut microbiota, plasma metabolites, and metabolic syndrome traits in the METSIM cohort

  • Elin Org1, 2Email author,
  • Yuna Blum1,
  • Silva Kasela2, 3,
  • Margarete Mehrabian1,
  • Johanna Kuusisto4, 5,
  • Antti J. Kangas6,
  • Pasi Soininen6, 7,
  • Zeneng Wang8,
  • Mika Ala-Korpela6, 7, 9,
  • Stanley L. Hazen8,
  • Markku Laakso4, 5 and
  • Aldons J. Lusis1, 10, 11Email author
Genome Biology201718:70

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1194-2

Received: 27 November 2016

Accepted: 16 March 2017

Published: 13 April 2017

Abstract

Background

The gut microbiome is a complex and metabolically active community that directly influences host phenotypes. In this study, we profile gut microbiota using 16S rRNA gene sequencing in 531 well-phenotyped Finnish men from the Metabolic Syndrome In Men (METSIM) study.

Results

We investigate gut microbiota relationships with a variety of factors that have an impact on the development of metabolic and cardiovascular traits. We identify novel associations between gut microbiota and fasting serum levels of a number of metabolites, including fatty acids, amino acids, lipids, and glucose. In particular, we detect associations with fasting plasma trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) levels, a gut microbiota-dependent metabolite associated with coronary artery disease and stroke. We further investigate the gut microbiota composition and microbiota–metabolite relationships in subjects with different body mass index and individuals with normal or altered oral glucose tolerance. Finally, we perform microbiota co-occurrence network analysis, which shows that certain metabolites strongly correlate with microbial community structure and that some of these correlations are specific for the pre-diabetic state.

Conclusions

Our study identifies novel relationships between the composition of the gut microbiota and circulating metabolites and provides a resource for future studies to understand host–gut microbiota relationships.

Keywords

Host-microbiota interactions TMAO Metabolic traits Serum metabolites Type 2 diabetes

Background

Multiple studies in humans and animal models have established that the gut microbiota contribute significantly to a variety of cardio-metabolic traits, including obesity, type 2 diabetes (T2D) [13], insulin resistance [47], atherosclerosis, and heart failure [810]. A growing body of evidence shows that microbial metabolites have a major influence on host physiology. The best known bacterial fermentation products are short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) such as acetate, butyrate, and propionate, which exert several effects, including maintenance of gut barrier function and providing a source of energy for colonocytes and bacterial communities (reviewed in [11]). Another example is trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), a metabolite derived from dietary choline and carnitine through the action of gut microbes. TMAO plays an important role in several cardio-metabolic phenotypes and is associated with chronic kidney disease [8, 9, 12, 13].

The majority of published studies thus far have focused on describing the gut microbiome profile changes between specific disease groups and control individuals. These findings usually explain dysbiosis states related to end phenotypes and are not well powered to discover alterations that are present in the general population and can ultimately affect the development of common complex diseases. A growing body of evidence suggests that a variety of intrinsic and environmental factors, such as long-term dietary patterns and host physiology and genetics, significantly affect the structure and functional capabilities of gut microbial communities [1417].

Recently, two large-scale studies from Europe characterized the gut microbiota composition and variation in subjects collected from the general population [18, 19]. Rich metadata on various health and lifestyle factors showed several associations that impact the variation of the gut microbiome in the general population. The Netherland cohort study also showed the contribution of gut microbiota to body mass index (BMI) and lipid variation, highlighting its role in the regulation of metabolic processes and cardiometabolic diseases [20]. To date, however, no population-based studies have been performed to assess the association between microbiota and a large spectrum of cardiometabolic traits.

In the current study we performed systematic analysis of the gut microbiome and a variety of metabolically relevant traits in 531 middle-aged Finnish men, collected from the general population of the METabolic Syndrome In Men (METSIM) study [21]. All subjects from this population-based cohort have been extensively characterized for a variety of cardiovascular and metabolic traits, including 2-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), insulin resistance, BMI, and serum metabolites such as fatty acids, lipids, amino acids, glycolysis precursor metabolites, and ketone bodies. We identified several significant relationships, particularly between gut microbiota and circulating serum metabolites. In addition, we examined the fasting plasma levels of the microbiota-dependent metabolite TMAO. Several observed relationships were further supported by operational taxonomy unit (OTU)-based co-occurrence network analysis. Finally, we also assessed microbiome–metabolite interactions in subjects with extreme BMI and in a pre-diabetic stage based on an impaired fasting glucose tolerance test.

Results

Landscape of the METSIM gut microbiome

Our study included 531 individuals, representing a sub-cohort who participated in a follow-up study from the METSIM cohort (total cohort n = 10,000). This general population-based study cohort, consisting of males aged 45–70 years, was collected from Eastern Finland and has been extensively phenotyped for a variety of metabolic parameters (Additional file 1: Table S1) [21]. Stool samples for microbiota analysis were collected during a clinical visit together with fasting blood samples. Baseline characteristics for each study participant are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Characteristics of 531 METSIM subjects

Clinical trait

Average

Standard deviation

Age (years)

61.97

5.45

Body mass index (kg/m2)

27.92

3.60

Waist to hip ratio (cm)

0.998

0.06

Fat mass (%)

25.79

6.93

OGTT fasting plasma glucose (mmol/l)

5.77

0.49

OGTT 30 min plasma glucose (mmol/l)

9.35

1.49

OGTT 120 min plasma glucose (mmol/l)

5.96

1.91

OGTT fasting plasma insulin (mU/l)

9.43

5.97

OGTT 30 min plasma insulin (mU/l)

65.20

42.79

OGTT 120 min plasma insulin (mU/l)

48.01

66.76

HbA1c (%)

5.6

0.29

Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

130.12

13.51

Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)

82.35

7.84

HOMA-IR

2.47

1.69

Hba1c glycated hemoglobin, HOMA-IR homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance

We first characterized the phylogenetic variation across samples at different taxonomic levels. We sorted sequences into 1148 OTUs (≥97% identity). Of these OTUs, 321 were present in at least 50% of the samples. As expected, we observed considerable variation in the abundance of taxa in the METSIM fecal microbial communities, indicating a typical Western diversity profile where Firmicutes (mean = 53.43%, range = 12.9–94.1%) and Bacteroidetes (mean = 40.80%, range = 0.11–85.9%) were the dominant phyla (Additional file 1: Table S2; Additional file 2: Figure S1a). Overall, we detected ten bacterial phyla and one archaeal phylum. Forty percent of individuals contained archaeal taxa from phylum Euryarcheota and genus Methanobrevibacter (0.15%, 0–6.7%). The most dominant bacterial families (90% of total sequences) belong to Bacteoridacea (28% of total sequences), Ruminococcacea (20% of total sequences), and Lachnospiracea (16% of total sequences) (Additional file 2: Figure S1c). At the genus level, Bacteroides was the most dominant and variable phylotype across 531 METSIM samples ranging from 0.1 to 85.6%, in agreement with previous results [22, 23].

We first assessed how variable the gut microbial composition was in the METSIM cohort in terms of microbial diversity and richness. The microbial richness, which refers to the number of OTUs per individual, exhibited on average 329 OTUs per individual, ranging from 108 to 474 (Additional file 1: Table S3). Based on unconstrained canonical analysis of genus-level community composition (see “Methods”), we found that the main genera driving diversity in the gut landscape are Bacteroides, an unclassified Ruminococcaceae genus, and Prevotella (Fig. 1a). This is consistent with other population-based gut microbiome studies, showing that these three genera are major contributors to community variation and define previously proposed enterotypes [18, 23]. However, our data support continuous rather than distinct clusters, in agreement with recently published data [24].
Fig. 1

Microbial community variation in the METSIM cohort. a Top contributors to community variation as determined by canonical correspondence analysis on unscaled genera abundances, plotted on the first principal component (PC) dimensions (arrows scaled to contribution). b The top seven metabolite contributors to microbiome community variation. c A total of 32 out of 60 factors (60%) explained a total of 13% of variance of the gut microbiome according to Bray–Curtis distance. TG triglycerides, FA fatty acids, DHA docosahexaenoic acid, MUFA monounsaturated fatty acid, PUFA polyunsaturated fatty acid

Metabolite associations with gut microbiota richness and diversity

The METSIM cohort has been studied for a variety of cardiovascular and metabolic traits, providing an opportunity to identify potential relationships with gut microbiota composition. Using a nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy platform [25], we quantified a broad molecular signature of the systemic serum metabolite profiles, such as lipids, fatty acids, glycolysis-related metabolites, ketone bodies, and amino acids. A list of the traits we examined is presented in Additional file 1: Table S1.

We first investigated whether bacterial diversity and richness were correlated with 57 traits (Additional file 1: Table S1). After adjustment for age and treatment, 37 traits were associated with inter-individual distance of microbial composition (Bray-Curtis distance) at a false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.1, together explaining 14.1% of the variation in composition distance (Additional file 1: Table S4). Figure 1b shows the traits that contribute the highest variation in microbial composition distance. Among the associations we detected, acetate showed the strongest effect on the variation in microbial diversity and the richness was positively correlated with glutamine, glycated hemoglobin (Hba1c), and acetate levels (FDR <0.1) (Fig. 1b, c; Additional file 1: Tables S4 and S5; Additional file 2: Figure S2).

Metabolite associations with gut microbiota composition

We next performed multivariate association analysis between each trait with 91 unique taxa and 321 OTUs (shared in 50% of individuals). When adjusted for age and treatment, we identified 140 associations between 26 traits and 72 unique bacterial OTUs at a FDR of 0.05 (Additional file 1: Table S6). Overall, 51 OTUs were significantly associated with different fatty acids, 33 OTUs with ketone bodies, 19 OTUs with amino acids and glycolysis-related metabolites, nine OTUs with glycoprotein acetyls, six OTUs with choline pathway metabolites, and three OTUs with HbA1c levels (Additional file 1: Table S6; Additional file 2: Figure S3). At the taxonomy level, we identified a total of 40 significant associations between 17 traits and 23 unique taxa with FDR <0.05: 19 taxa were associated with fatty acids, nine with ketone bodies, five with glycolysis-related metabolites, three with amino acids, two with glycoprotein acetyls, and one each with betaine and TMAO (Fig. 2; Additional file 1: Table S7).
Fig. 2

Associations between microbiota taxa and circulating serum metabolites. Serum metabolite concentrations were measured from fasting samples using NMR or LC-MS/MS. They were then associated with microbial taxa following adjustment for age and treatment of the subjects. *Ruminococcus from the family Lachnospiraceae; **Ruminococcus from the family Ruminococcaceae. CI confidence interval, DHA docosahexaenoic acid, MUFA monounsaturated fatty acid, PUFA polyunsaturated fatty acid

The strongest associations with both taxonomy and unique bacterial OTUs were with acetate and glutamine levels, indicating a strong overlap between associations detected with diversity and richness. Acetate is the most common SCFA in the human colon, produced in the large intestine by anaerobic intestinal microbiota through fermentation of non-digestible carbohydrate. In total, 28 unique OTUs and eight unique taxa were associated with serum acetate levels with FDR <0.05 (Fig. 2; Additional file 1: Tables S6 and S7). Increased acetate levels were associated with higher abundances of phylum Tenericutes (mainly represented by order RF-39), family Christensenellaceae, unclassified Clostridales, Peptococcaceae, and several members of family Clostridiaceae, whereas reduced levels were associated with higher abundances of Blautia and genus Oscillospira (Additional file 1: Table S6; Additional file 2: Figure S3). Acetate was also strongly correlated with other traits. For example, a significant positive correlation was detected with polyunsaturated fatty acids, such as omega-6 and 18:2 linoleic acids and with serum cholesterol and TMAO levels, whereas a negative correlation was detected with several amino acids (alanine, tyrosine, isoleucine, and leucine), glycolysis precursors (lactate and pyruvate), and glycoprotein acetyl levels (FDR <0.05) (Additional file 1: Table S8).

Western diets tend to have a high fat content, and increased fat consumption is associated with obesity, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome [26]. It has been shown that high-fat content food perturbs gut microbiota and induces pro-inflammatory signaling [3, 27]. We identified several significant associations with various fatty acids, accounting altogether for 41% of all taxonomy level (19 out of 46) and 33.8% of all OTU level (51 out of 151) associations (Fig. 2; Additional file 1: Tables S5 and S6; Additional file 2: Figure S3). At both the taxa and OTU levels, the most significant associations were observed with the abundance of members of the genus Blautia and phylum Tenericutes. The abundance of Blautia was positively associated with saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids and negatively associated with degree of unsaturation and polyunsaturated fatty acids, including omega-3, 22:6 docosahexaenoic acid, omega-6, and 18:22 linoleic acids. In contrast, opposite associations with the same traits were detected with phylum Tenericutes, family Peptococcaceae, and genus Bacteroides (Fig. 2).

Multiple significant associations were detected with glycolysis-related metabolites and with amino acids (Fig. 2). For example, fasting glucose levels were strongly associated with unclassified Coriobacteriaceae and several OTUs from Blautia were positively associated with pyruvate and glycerol. This is in line with a recent finding showing that members of Coriobacteriacea are depleted in individuals with diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance [28]. One of the strongest associations between amino acids and gut microbiota was detected with glutamine levels, where several species from unclassified Clostridales were positively correlated with increased glutamine concentrations (Fig. 2; Additional file 2: Figure S3). In addition, the branch-chain amino acids (BCAAs) isoleucine and valine were negatively associated with the abundance of Christensenellaceae and positively associated with Blautia. Recent studies have shown that glutamine supplementation alters gut microbiota composition and improves glucose tolerance and obesity [29, 30]. In contrast, BCAAs and other hydrophobic amino acids, including alanine and the aromatic amino acids phenylalanine and tyrosine, have been shown to be elevated in individuals with metabolic disorders. Our data support these observations showing significantly elevated glutamine and reduced BCAAs in individuals with low BMI and elevated BCAAs in individuals with high homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) values (Additional file 2: Figure S4).

Recently, population-based cohort studies from the Netherlands investigated the contribution of gut microbiota to the variation of blood lipids and BMI [19, 20]. Here we confirmed associations with triglyceride (TG) levels, showing that higher abundances of genus Methanobrevibacter from Archaea (P = 4.4 × 10−4), Tenericutes (P = 0.0022), Peptococcaceae (P = 0.0098), and Christensenellaceae (P = 0.0123) correlate with lower TG levels. Although some other associations with high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and BMI were shared between our study and the Netherlands cohort study, after correction for multiple comparisons these associations were no longer significant (FDR >0.1; data not shown).

Associations with TMAO, a metabolite derived from gut microbiota

Recent studies have revealed associations of gut microbiota-dependent metabolite TMAO with the development of cardiometabolic and renal phenotypes [8, 10, 3134]. Using mass spectrometry analysis [9], we measured choline, carnitine, betaine, and TMAO levels in fasting serum and identified four significant associations (FDR <0.05) with unique taxa (three with TMAO and one with betaine) and eight associations with OTUs (six with betaine, one with choline, and one with carnitine) (Fig. 2; Additional file 1: Tables S5 and S6; Additional file 2: Figure S3). We confirmed previously detected associations between TMAO and the abundance of Peptococcaceae (P = 4.67 × 10−4) and Prevotella (P = 0.004) (Fig. 2) [12, 35]. Interestingly, we also observed a negative association between TMAO and the abundance of common gut commensal Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (P = 0.006; FDR <0.08). Decreased abundance of F. prausnitzii has been linked to dysbiosis in several human disorders, including obesity, diabetes, and several immune-related diseases [36, 37]. Our data also confirmed a previously reported association between TMAO and creatinine levels, but in addition we found significant associations with valine, acetate, and unsaturated and omega-3 fatty acids levels (Additional file 1: Table S9; Additional file 2: Figure S5).

OTU co-occurrence network and metabolite associations

The human gut is a complex and dynamic ecosystem consisting of a diverse collection of microorganisms with a variety of functional relationships. In order to detect relationships between different members of the gut microbiome and their potential combined effect on metabolic output, we constructed a network of co-occurrence OTUs and interrogated the network for modules using weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) (see “Methods”; Fig. 3a, b). The complete list of OTUs and their module organization is available in Additional file 1: Tables S10 and S11. Phylogenetically related OTUs were observed to cluster into the same modules preferentially, although each module also included phylogenetically distinct OTUs from different taxa. Therefore, in addition to phylogenetic relatedness, the formation of modules depended upon additional ecological affinities, reflecting complementary convergent functionality.
Fig. 3

OTU co-occurrence network and module-trait associations. a OTU co-occurrence network where OTU (nodes) are colored according to the phyla to which they belong. Blue edges correspond to positive correlations and red edges to negative correlations. Any resulting correlations with p value ≥0.01 and abs(r) <0.3 were removed. b OTU co-occurrence network were OTU (nodes) are colored according to WGCNA module colors. c Module–trait associations are shown. Each cell of the matrix contains the correlation between one OTU module and a metabolic trait, and the corresponding p value. The table is color-coded by correlation according to the color legend (red for positive correlations and green for negative correlations). FA fatty acids, DHA docosahexaenoic acid, MUFA monounsaturated fatty acid, PUFA polyunsaturated fatty acid, GlycA glycoprotein acetyls, TMAO trimethyl N-oxide

The module–metabolite associations confirmed previously detected metabolite–taxa relationships. For example, the blue module, which contains OTUs from unclassified Clostridales, Tenericutes, Methanobrevibacter, and Christensenellaceae, is positively correlated with acetate, glutamine, and polyunsaturated fatty acids, whereas the yellow module, representing OTUs mostly from Blautia, is negatively correlated with acetate and other traits associated with the blue module (Fig. 3c). All these associations were detected with single taxonomy and/or OTUs (Additional file 1: Tables S5 and S6). However, both modules also included several other OTUs from different taxa, providing further insights for metabolically important relationships.

The gut microbiota relationships with obese and impaired glucose tolerance phenotypes

We next assessed the associations of gut microbiomes with obese and pre-diabetic states by subdividing individuals based on BMI and the entire range of fasting and 2-h plasma glucose tolerance tests. The average BMI of the 531 subjects was 27.92 (±0.16), where 100 subjects (19%) had a BMI <25 and 132 (25%) had a BMI >30. The pre-diabetic state includes individuals with impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), or both (see “Methods” for details) [38]. Based on these criteria, 164 subjects (31%) had normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and 352 had been classified as in a pre-diabetic stage (pre-T2D), from which 287 (54%) had IFG, 15 (2.8%) had isolated IGT, and 50 (9.4%) had a combination of IFG and IGT. A total of 15 individuals had newly diagnosed T2D in follow-up visits and these individuals were excluded from the analysis. The characteristics of these subjects are shown in Additional file 1: Table S12.

We first evaluated bacterial richness, diversity, and differences in the ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes in subjects with different body weights and predisposition to T2D based on OGTT. No significant differences were detected in either bacterial richness or in the ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes (Additional file 2: Figure S6a, b). However, several differences were observed in gut microbiota composition between subjects with extreme BMI and between NGT and pre-T2D (Fig. 4a, b; Additional file 2: Figure S6c). For example, subjects with high BMI had significantly higher abundance of family Tissierellacea and genus Blautia and decreased abundances of Archaea (Methanobrevibacter) (Fig. 4a). Pre-diabetic subjects, however, had higher abundances of Anaerostipes and lower abundances of an OTU from families Ruminococcaceae and Christencenellacea and genus Methanobrevibacter (Fig. 4b). Both the methanogen Methanobrevibacter and Christencenellacea have been associated with a lean phenotype in previous studies [6, 16, 19, 39].
Fig. 4

The gut microbiota differences in metabolic phenotypes. Mean proportions of significantly different taxa between individuals with different BMI values (a) and individuals with different 2-h glucose tolerance test (NGT and pre-T2D) (b). Examples of BMI/OGGT metabolite–microbiota interaction, where the abundances of Bacteroidales, Collinsella (c) and Coprobacillus (d) exhibit opposite associations in individuals with low versus high BMI levels or individuals with impaired glucose tolerance test (c). *P ≤ 0.01, **P ≤ 0.001, ***P ≤ 0.0001. BMI body mass index, GT glucose tolerance, NGT normal glucose tolerance, T2D type 2 diabetes

Using a multivariate regression model we tested whether obesity and pre-T2D affect associations between individual microbial taxa and metabolites, and whether there was interaction between obese/pre-T2D status and microbial taxa. For example, in obese subjects, the higher abundance of Bacteroidales was associated with lower HOMA-IR and the higher abundance of Collinsella with higher levels of glycerol and phenylalanine, and in lean subjects the effect was opposite (Fig. 4c). Also, the abundance of Coprobacillus relative to plasma leucine concentrations depended on the pre-T2D status (FDR <0.05) (Fig. 4d). Finally, we also constructed OTU co-occurrence networks separately for subjects with NGT and for pre-T2D as defined by OGTTs. Our data show clear differences between interactions of OTUs in both networks (Additional file 1: Table S13; Additional file 2: Figure S7a). A module preservation analysis indicated modules that are unique only for pre-T2D individuals. For example, a tan module, which contains mostly OTUs from family Ruminococcacea and genera Ruminococcus and Oscillospira, is strongly correlated with glucose levels only in pre-T2D subjects (Additional file 2: Figure S7b–d).

Discussion

We investigated the associations of gut microbiota with a large number of metabolically relevant traits using a subset of 531 Finnish men the from Metabolic Syndrome in Men (METSIM) cohort. The METSIM cohort (total 10,197 individuals) is one of the largest single-site population based cohorts and was collected from Kuopio, Eastern Finland, and established to evaluate genetic determinants of metabolic traits in middle-aged men. There is increasing evidence that gut microbiota are an important factor, in addition to genetic and life style factors, for the development of obesity, insulin resistance, T2D, and cardiovascular disease. The gut microbiome is a complex and metabolically active community, producing many metabolites which can directly influence host phenotype. Our study investigated gut microbiota relationships with a variety of factors that have profound impacts on the development of metabolic and cardiovascular traits. We present several new findings. First, we identified a number of associations between gut microbiota and fasting serum levels of fatty acids, amino acids, lipids, and glucose. These associations were detected with both the diversity and richness of gut microbiota as well as with unique bacteria. Second, we detected significant associations with fasting plasma TMAO concentrations, a metabolite derived from dietary choline and carnitine through the action of gut microbiota. Third, we identified a group of co-occurrence microbes and demonstrated that OTU-based module–trait associations confirm already identified associations as well as provide some new insights for microbiota–trait relationships. Finally, we detected altered microbiota composition and significant microbiota–metabolite relationships dependent on BMI and normal or altered oral glucose tolerance. These points are discussed in turn below.

Mounting evidence in mice and humans shows the important role of gut microbiota-derived metabolites in regulating metabolism. Multiple studies have shown that plasma levels of TMAO, derived from dietary choline and carnitine through the action of gut microbiota, are associated with coronary artery disease, stroke, and several cardiometabolic traits, including increased coagulation and vascular inflammation [8, 3133]. Consistent with previous findings in both mice and humans, we found that the plasma TMAO concentrations were significantly associated with Prevotella and Peptococcaceae. Additionally, we saw a significant positive correlation between plasma TMAO concentrations with unclassified Clostridales and negative correlation with F. prausnitzii (FDR <0.1). F. prausnitzii has been shown to exert anti-inflammatory effects and decreased abundance of it has been noted in several immune-related diseases.

Our data show the strongest associations between gut microbiota and acetate and glutamine levels, where a total of nine unique taxa were significantly associated with elevated acetate levels. The higher glutamine and acetate levels were both also associated with significantly higher bacterial richness. An elevated abundance of unclassified Clostridales was associated with elevated glutamine levels and negatively associated with inflammation-related circulating levels of glycoprotein acetyls (mainly alpha-1-acid glycoprotein). The phylum Tenericutes (mainly represented by order RF-39 and ML615J_28) and family Christensenellaceae were among the top taxa that showed association with elevated acetate levels. Both taxa have been previously reported to be associated with low BMI and TG and higher HDL levels [16, 20]. In the current study we were only able to confirm order ML615J_28 associations with lower TG levels (P = 0.0093), although other trends were consistent. In addition, we identified novel strong associations between Christensenellaceae and lower levels of BCAAs (leucine and isoleucine) and between Tenericutes and higher ratios of polyunsaturated fatty acids to total fatty acids.

Acetate is the most common short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) that is formed during bacterial fermentation of carbohydrates in the colon [40]. SCFAs are readily absorbed in the plasma of the host via the intestinal epithelium and thus can serve as an energy source, predominantly via metabolism in the liver [11, 41]. Previous studies have shown that both increases and decreases in plasma SCFA concentrations can be associated with obesity and metabolic syndrome [42]. It has been shown that prebiotic fructooligosaccharides and inulin increase the levels of acetate and that this is associated with reduced body weight and fat mass, decreased diabetes, and a lower food intake [43, 44]. However, recent work by Perry et al. [45] showed that increased production of acetate by an altered gut microbiota in rodents leads to activation of the parasympathetic nervous system and stimulation of insulin secretion. These studies indicate that the role of acetate in driving obesity depends on the gut microbiota composition and on dietary fiber intake.

Several studies have indicated influences of bacterial taxa on lipid and fatty acid levels [20, 46]. The serum fatty acid profile is determined by both diet and host factors, such as endogenous fatty acid metabolism [47]. The Western diet, rich in simple carbohydrates and fat, markedly affects the gut microbiota ecosystem at the compositional and functional levels [3, 14, 48, 49]. Elevated levels of lipids and free fatty acids are known risk factors for metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, and obesity [50]. However, dietary fatty acids differ in structure and have been shown to exert opposite metabolic effects [51, 52]. Our data show that fasting serum levels of glycerol, monounsaturated fatty acids, and saturated fatty acids are strongly associated with increased abundance of Blautia and Dorea and decreased abundance of Coprococcus and Peptococcaceae, whereas the same taxa show opposite associations with polyunsaturated fatty acids, including omega-6 and DHA and omega-3 and linoleic acid. Several OTUs from genus Blautia were also positively associated with BCAA (isoleucine and leucine), alanine, glycerol, and pyruvate levels. Blautia is a common gut habitant, an acetogen that belongs to the family Lachnospiraceae, which is one of the major taxonomic groups of the human gut microbiota that degrade complex polysaccharides to SCFAs. Blautia has the ability to ferment a large variety of organic substrates, enabling flexible growth in the colon. Bacteria in the Blautia genus have been associated with both decreased and increased obesity and Crohn’s disease [53, 54]. Our data also showed increased abundance of Blautia in individuals with high BMI levels (Fig. 4a). Interestingly, a recent study detected an association between Blautia and human genetic variants in a genomic region that has been associated with obesity and BMI [55]. Since there is great diversity among Blautia oligotypes, suggesting that the genus represents strains that comprise a variety of metabolic capacities optimized for a host and a host environment [56].

Complex interactions exist between gut microbiota and metabolites. Transient changes in the intestinal ecosystem occur throughout life and are affected by several factors, the most by dietary components. Consumption of fat- and sugar-rich diets modifies the gut microbiota community, which triggers changes in host metabolic pathways and ultimately affects metabolic state. TMAO is a good example, where multiple bacterial enzymes are linked to specific biochemical transformations by the host. However, the exact molecular relationship among microbe-derived gut metabolites, how microbes affect host signaling pathways, and host physiology are still poorly understood. Our data are correlative and therefore we are unable to determine the functional potential of the microbial community. Further studies (metagenomic and functional studies) will be required in order to understand the exact link between microbiota, metabolites, and their link with host health.

Bacteria in the gut constitute a complex ecosystem in which different species exhibit specialized functions and interact as a community. Therefore, genetic studies of communities, as defined by co-occurrence or some other measures, may provide a better global picture of the functional variation that occurs in populations [57]. We identified modules of microbial communities based on co-occurrence and used these groups to identify associations with traits. These generally confirmed similar associations observed with single taxa or OTUs; for instance, OTUs that belong to blue and yellow modules have opposite effects with traits and these modules contain taxa that showed significant associations with the same traits (Additional file 1: Table S11). In addition, module-based associations also pointed to some new associations that were missed with single taxa or OTU-based associations.

The METSIM study has been established to evaluate important determinants of metabolic and cardiovascular traits. T2D is preceded by a long pre-diabetic state characterized by mild elevation of fasting and/or postprandial glucose levels. Since this asymptomatic stage may last for years, it’s important to determine characteristics that associate with impaired glucose metabolism. In this study the risk of T2D was assessed using OGTTs and 54% of subjects had either impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and/or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). We were unable to detect significant differences in bacterial richness as well as changes in the ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes, parameters that are usually linked to obesity and T2D phenotypes. The 16S rRNA gene captures broad shifts in community diversity over time, but with limited resolution and lower sensitivity compared to metagenomic data [58]. Therefore, metagenomic approaches provide better estimates of the extent of microbial diversity and richness. However, several taxa showed significantly different abundances between lean and obese subjects and individuals with impaired glucose tolerance. Moreover, we also showed specific gut microbiota–metabolite interactions within these groups.

Finally, we were able to confirm some previously detected associations with plasma lipids. For example, the increased abundance of Methanobacteriaceae and genus Coprococcus was associated with lower levels of TGs. In addition, novel significant associations were detected between Methanobacteriaceae and lower levels of glycerol and total and monounsaturated fatty acid levels (FDR <0.1). In our cohort 40% of subjects had significant levels of Methanobacteriaceae, a common methanogen which recycles hydrogen by combining it with carbon dioxide to form methane. Methanobacteriaceae have been associated with reduced levels of obesity [59]. Consistent with our associations with TG levels, inhibitory effects of saturated fatty acids on methanogenesis have been recently reported [60]. However, we were unable to detect any significant associations with HDL and total cholesterol levels. The observed inconsistencies may indicate either limited power to detect relationships, variations between study designs, and/or the existence of population-specific associations. The METSIM cohort involves only middle-aged Finnish men, whereas previously reported population-based studies from Europe report findings for both genders over a larger age distribution. The inconsistencies are also commonly seen in animal studies, where mice are maintained in highly controlled environments with similar diets. In the current study, all stool samples were collected in the clinic at the same time as all measurements and blood were taken from the Kuopio region of Eastern Finland. This population is a genetically relatively homogeneous sub-isolate, which originated from a limited number of founder ancestors and is, therefore, enriched in specific genetic variants. Additional population-based cohort studies are needed to determine whether there are in fact substantial differences in predictors of fecal sample-derived microbiota between populations. Importantly, our study involved only middle-aged Finnish men and therefore we cannot exclude the possibility that some of the detected associations are gender-specific. Recent evidence clearly indicates gender differences in bacterial richness, diversity, and composition [19, 6163].

Conclusions

Our study provides a strong indication that several cardio-metabolically relevant traits and metabolites are modulated by the action of gut microbiota. We have identified a number of novel relationships between gut microbes and different circulating metabolites, where some of these interactions could predict a pre-diabetic state. Our data provide a significant biological resource and novel avenues for further studies. Further functional and mechanistic investigations are needed in order to clarify relationships between microbial communities and specific cardio-metabolic phenotypes. The extensive clinical and molecular characterization of the METSIM cohort, as well as its homogenous nature, make it particularly useful for understanding host–microbiota relationships.

Methods

Sample collection and characterization

A total of 531 men from the ongoing population-based cross-sectional METSIM study were included in the current study. METSIM is a randomly selected cohort of unrelated men (aged 45–70 years) selected from the population register of the town of Kuopio in Eastern Finland (population 95,000). Our subset of participants took part in a 7-year follow-up study. The study was designed to determine the prevalence and genetic determinants of a wide spectrum of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases (metabolic syndrome, T2D, impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glucose, hypertension, obesity, dyslipidemia, coronary heart disease, stroke, and peripheral vascular disease). Every participant had a 1-day outpatient visit to the Clinical Research Unit at the University of Kuopio, including an interview about the history of previous diseases, current health status, and drug treatment. Each participants’ height, weight, waist to hip circumference, and blood pressure were measured together with an evaluation of glucose tolerance and cardiovascular risk factors. The study protocol has been previously described (Stancáková et al. [21]). Characteristics of the subjects included in this study are shown in Table 1. Fasting blood samples were drawn after 12 h of fasting followed by an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Stool samples were provided during their evaluation at University of Kuopio Hospital and immediately stored at −80 °C. All subjects have given written informed consent and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Kuopio and was in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.

Sample preparation, sequencing, and data processing

Microbial DNA was extracted from a total of 531 frozen fecal samples using the PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Microbial DNA was extracted and the 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the 515 F/806R primer set targeting the V4 hypervariable region and the DNA sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform as previously described [15]. 16S rRNA sequencing data for the 531 samples are available in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession number SRP097785 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRP097785).

De-multiplexing 16S rRNA gene sequences, quality control, and OTU binning were performed using the open source pipeline Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) version 1.7.0 [64, 65]. The total number of sequencing reads was 12,785,442 (an average of 21,543 reads per sample) with an average length of 153 base pairs. Sequences were binned into OTUs based on 97% identity using UCLUST [66] against the Greengenes reference database (version 13.8) [67]. Each sample’s sequences were rarefied to 10,000 reads per strain to reduce the effect of sequencing depth. Microbial composition at each taxonomic level was defined using the summarize_taxa function in QIIME. To ensure comprehensive analysis, we sequenced biological replicates on 13 samples and observed high reproducibility (Additional file 2: Figure S1b).

Metabolite measurements

Fasting serum samples were collected in the clinic and stored at −80 °C. These were thawed overnight in a refrigerator prior to analysis for lipids, lipoproteins, fatty acids, amino acids, and glycolysis precursor molecules listed in Additional file 1: Table S1 using a NMR spectroscopy platform [25, 68, 69]. Stable isotope dilution liquid chromatography with on-line tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used for quantification of plasma TMAO, choline, betaine, and carnitine as previously described [9].

Glucose metabolism assessment

Plasma glucose was measured by enzymatic hexokinase photometric assay (Konelab Systems reagents; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vantaa, Finland). HbA1c was analyzed with a Tosoh G7 glycohemoglobin analyzer (Tosoh Bioscience, San Francisco, CA, USA). Plasma insulin concentrations were measured by a luminometric immunoassay measurement (ADVIA Centaur Insulin IRI, no. 02230141; Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY, USA). HOMA-IR calculation was performed according to the formula: Concentration of fasting blood glucose (mmol/l) × Concentration of fasting blood insulin (mU/l)/22.5. Insulin resistance (IR) was diagnosed if HOMA-IR >2.5.

A 75-g OGTT was performed with blood glucose measurement before glucose intake and 2 h later. Patients were divided into three groups depending on the glucose metabolism deviation degree: i) individuals without glucose intolerance (fasting glucose <5.6 mmol/l and 2-h glucose is <7.8 mmol/l); ii) individuals with pre-diabetes (pre-T2D), impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance (5.6 to 6.9 mmol/l and 2-h glucose from 7.8 to 11.0 mmol/l); and iii) individuals with newly diagnosed T2D at the clinical visit (fasting glucose ≥7.0 mmol/l or 2-h glucose ≥11.1 mmol/l). Individuals with T1D were excluded from the study.

Statistical analysis

Alpha-diversity (the number of observed genera (richness), Pielou’s index (evenness), and Fisher’s alpha (diversity) and beta-diversity (Bray–Curtis dissimilarities) indices were generated using vegdist and diversity functions in the vegan R package (version 2.3-2). We assessed how many variations of Bray–Curtis distance can be explained by each of the 60 traits using the function adonis from the R package vegan. The p value was determined by 1000× permutations and was further adjusted for multiple testing of 60 traits using the Benjamini and Hochberg method. The total variation explained was also calculated per category (fatty acids, glycolysis-related metabolites, amino acids, ketone bodies) and for all traits together. The association analysis was assessed by the Spearman correlation between each trait and each diversity or richness measure. The p values were further adjusted for multiple testing of 60 traits using the Benjamini and Hochberg method.

The contribution of each genus and metabolite to microbiome variation was derived from canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) using both raw as well as normalized genus abundances. CCA was performed using the vegan R package function cca, which performs ordination based on abundances and variations of each taxa. Covariates of microbiome variation were identified by calculating the association between traits and genus-level community ordination (principal component analysis based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity) with the enfit function in the vegan R package (10,000 permutations, FDR 5%). Overall, 60 metadata covariates were identified. Their combined effect size was estimated with the bioenv functions in the vegan package. Microbiome covariates were further tested for associations with alpha-diversity measures and abundance of genera.

To test the association for each taxonomy and species, we first filtered low abundance species and did our analysis using 321 OTUs (shared in more than 50% of samples). The percentage of each species was arcsine-square root-transformed by taking the arcsine of the square root of the proportional value of each species. The associations of individual species with each factor were assessed using boosted additive generalized linear models available in the MaAsLin R package with 5% significance level after multiple testing correction. MaAsLin is a multivariate statistical framework that finds associations between clinical metadata and microbial community abundance or function. In our analysis we used the default settings of MaAsLin.

Co-occurrence network analysis

Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) [70] was used to generate a co-occurrence network based on the OTU arcsine-square root-transformed count data. Briefly, we considered a signed network and chose the minimal beta value satisfying the scale free topology criteria (optimal beta = 6). We set up deepSplit = 2 and minModuleSize = 10 as parameters for the dynamic tree cut function [71]. The module eigenOTU defined as the first principle component of a module was used to calculate the Pearson correlation between a module and a metabolic trait. Significance of the correlation was determined by a Student asymptotic p value. Visualization of the network was performed using the gplot function available in the sna R package.

For co-occurrence network comparisons, we constructed networks in pre-T2D and NGS conditions using the same criteria as described above. We randomly chose 100 samples in both conditions to ensure the same statistical power in network estimation. Module preservation was assessed using Z-summary as implemented in the WGCNA R package [72]. Briefly, this statistic evaluates the module preservation based on density and connectivity criteria and defined a preservation cutoff by randomly permuting the module labels in the test network (in the present study we used 1000 permutations in the test network, e.g., NGS condition).

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank all METSIM study participants, Calvin Pan for help with data storage and analysis, and Rosa Chen for manuscript preparation.

Funding

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants HL028481, HL30568, and DK094311 to AJL. EO was supported by FP7-MC-IOF grant number 330381. The serum NMR metabolomics platform has been supported by the Sigrid Juselius Foundation and the Strategic Research Funding from the University of Oulu. MAK works in a Unit that is supported by the University of Bristol and UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_1201/1).

Availability of data and materials

Individual-level 16S rRNA sequencing data for 531 samples within this study are available in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession number SRP097785 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRP097785). All remaining phenotype data in this study are available upon request through application to the METSIM data access committee.

Authors’ contributions

AJL supervised the study. JK and ML oversaw collection of samples. EO and MM collected microbial data. PS conceived, designed, and performed the NMR experiments. AJK and MA-K analyzed the NMR data. ZW and SLH performed the LS-MS/MS experiments and analyzed LM-MS/MS data. EO performed the analysis with contributions from YB and SK. EO and AJL prepared the manuscript with comments from other authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. PS and AJK are shareholders and report employment relation for Brainshake Ltd, a company offering NMR-based metabolite profiling.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All subjects have given written informed consent and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Kuopio and was in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
(2)
Estonian Genome Centre, University of Tartu
(3)
Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu
(4)
Institute of Clinical Medicine, Internal Medicine, University of Eastern Finland
(5)
Kuopio University Hospital
(6)
Computational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu and Biocenter Oulu
(7)
NMR metabolomics Laboratory, School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland
(8)
Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic
(9)
Computational Medicine, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol and Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol
(10)
Department of Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles
(11)
Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles

References

  1. Karlsson FH, Tremaroli V, Nookaew I, Bergström G, Behre CJ, Fagerberg B, et al. Gut metagenome in European women with normal, impaired and diabetic glucose control. Nature. 2013;498:99–103. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23719380.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Qin J, Li Y, Cai Z, Li S, Zhu J, Zhang F, et al. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2012;490:55–60. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23023125.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Parks BW, Nam E, Org E, Kostem E, Norheim F, Hui ST, et al. Genetic control of obesity and gut microbiota composition in response to high-fat, high-sucrose diet in mice. Cell Metab. 2013;17:141–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2012.12.007.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Dumas M-E, Barton RH, Toye A, Cloarec O, Blancher C, Rothwell A, et al. Metabolic profiling reveals a contribution of gut microbiota to fatty liver phenotype in insulin-resistant mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:12511–6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16895997.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Pedersen HK, Gudmundsdottir V, Nielsen HB, Hyotylainen T, Nielsen T, Jensen BAH, et al. Human gut microbes impact host serum metabolome and insulin sensitivity. Nature. 2016;535:376–81. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27409811.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Le Chatelier E, Nielsen T, Qin J, Prifti E, Hildebrand F, Falony G, et al. Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature. 2013;500:541–6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23985870.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ussar S, Griffin NW, Bezy O, Fujisaka S, Vienberg S, Softic S, et al. Interactions between gut microbiota, host genetics and diet modulate the predisposition to obesity and metabolic syndrome. Cell Metab. 2015;22:516–30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26299453.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Zhu W, Gregory JC, Org E, Buffa JA, Gupta N, Wang Z, et al. Gut microbial metabolite TMAO enhances platelet hyperreactivity and thrombosis risk. Cell. 2016;165:111–24. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26972052.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Wang Z, Klipfell E, Bennett BJ, Koeth R, Levison BS, Dugar B, et al. Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease. Nature. 2011;472:57–63. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3086762&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Tang WHW, Wang Z, Shrestha K, Borowski AG, Wu Y, Troughton RW, et al. Intestinal microbiota-dependent phosphatidylcholine metabolites, diastolic dysfunction, and adverse clinical outcomes in chronic systolic heart failure. J Card Fail. 2015;21:91–6. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=4312712&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ríos-Covián D, Ruas-Madiedo P, Margolles A, Gueimonde M, de Los Reyes-Gavilán CG, Salazar N. Intestinal short chain fatty acids and their link with diet and human health. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:185. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26925050.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Koeth RA, Wang Z, Levison BS, Buffa JA, Org E, Sheehy BT, et al. Intestinal microbiota metabolism of L-carnitine, a nutrient in red meat, promotes atherosclerosis. Nat Med. 2013;19:576–85. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3650111&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Tang WHW, Wang Z, Kennedy DJ, Wu Y, Buffa JA, Agatisa-Boyle B, et al. Gut microbiota-dependent trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) pathway contributes to both development of renal insufficiency and mortality risk in chronic kidney disease. Circ Res. 2015;116:448–55. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25599331.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Wu GD, Chen J, Hoffmann C, Bittinger K, Chen Y-Y, Keilbaugh SA, et al. Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes. Science. 2011;334:105–8. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3368382&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Org E, Parks BW, Joo JWJ, Emert B, Schwartzman W, Kang EY, et al. Genetic and environmental control of host-gut microbiota interactions. Genome Res. 2015;25:1558–69. http://genome.cshlp.org/content/25/10/1558.long.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Goodrich JK, Waters JL, Poole AC, Sutter JL, Koren O, Blekhman R, et al. Human genetics shape the gut microbiome. Cell. 2014;159:789–99. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25417156.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Tremaroli V, Bäckhed F. Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature. 2012;489:242–9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22972297.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Falony G, Joossens M, Vieira-Silva S, Wang J, Darzi Y, Faust K, et al. Population-level analysis of gut microbiome variation. Science. 2016;352:560–4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27126039.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhernakova A, Kurilshikov A, Bonder MJ, Tigchelaar EF, Schirmer M, Vatanen T, et al. Population-based metagenomics analysis reveals markers for gut microbiome composition and diversity. Science. 2016;352:565–9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27126040.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fu J, Bonder MJ, Cenit MC, Tigchelaar EF, Maatman A, Dekens JAM, et al. The gut microbiome contributes to a substantial proportion of the variation in blood lipids. Circ Res. 2015;117:817–24. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26358192.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Stancáková A, Javorský M, Kuulasmaa T, Haffner SM, Kuusisto J, Laakso M. Changes in insulin sensitivity and insulin release in relation to glycemia and glucose tolerance in 6,414 Finnish men. Diabetes. 2009;58:1212–21. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19223598.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Zoetendal EG, Rajilic-Stojanovic M, de Vos WM. High-throughput diversity and functionality analysis of the gastrointestinal tract microbiota. Gut. 2008;57:1605–15. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18941009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Arumugam M, Raes J, Pelletier E, Le Paslier D, Yamada T, Mende DR, et al. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2011;473:174–80. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21508958.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Knights D, Ward TL, McKinlay CE, Miller H, Gonzalez A, McDonald D, et al. Rethinking “enterotypes”. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;16:433–7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25299329.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Soininen P, Kangas AJ, Würtz P, Suna T, Ala-Korpela M. Quantitative serum nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomics in cardiovascular epidemiology and genetics. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2015;8:192–206. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25691689.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Risérus U, Willett WC, Hu FB. Dietary fats and prevention of type 2 diabetes. Prog Lipid Res. 2009;48:44–51. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19032965.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Cani PD, Delzenne NM. Interplay between obesity and associated metabolic disorders: new insights into the gut microbiota. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2009;9:737–43. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19628432.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Karlsson F, Tremaroli V, Nielsen J, Bäckhed F. Assessing the human gut microbiota in metabolic diseases. Diabetes. 2013;62:3341–9. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3781439&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. de Souza AZZ, Zambom AZ, Abboud KY, Reis SK, Tannihão F, Guadagnini D, et al. Oral supplementation with L-glutamine alters gut microbiota of obese and overweight adults: A pilot study. Nutrition. 2015;31:884–9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25933498.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Cheng S, Rhee EP, Larson MG, Lewis GD, McCabe EL, Shen D, et al. Metabolite profiling identifies pathways associated with metabolic risk in humans. Circulation. 2012;125:2222–31. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22496159.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Koeth RA, Levison BS, Culley MK, Buffa JA, Wang Z, Gregory JC, et al. γ-Butyrobetaine is a proatherogenic intermediate in gut microbial metabolism of L-carnitine to TMAO. Cell Metab. 2014;20:799–812. http://www.cell.com/article/S1550413114004537/fulltext.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Gregory JC, Buffa JA, Org E, Wang Z, Levison BS, Zhu W, et al. Transmission of atherosclerosis susceptibility with gut microbial transplantation. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:5647–60. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25550161.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Seldin MM, Meng Y, Qi H, Zhu W, Wang Z, Hazen SL, et al. Trimethylamine N-oxide promotes vascular inflammation through signaling of mitogen-activated protein kinase and nuclear factor-κB. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26903003.
  34. Tang WHW, Wang Z, Levison BS, Koeth RA, Britt EB, Fu X, et al. Intestinal microbial metabolism of phosphatidylcholine and cardiovascular risk. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1575–84. http://www.nejm.org/doi/abs/10.1056/NEJMoa1109400.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Chen M, Yi L, Zhang Y, Zhou X, Ran L, Yang J, et al. Resveratrol attenuates trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO)-induced atherosclerosis by regulating TMAO synthesis and bile acid metabolism via remodeling of the gut microbiota. MBio. 2016;7:e02210–5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27048804.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Graessler J, Qin Y, Zhong H, Zhang J, Licinio J, Wong M-L, et al. Metagenomic sequencing of the human gut microbiome before and after bariatric surgery in obese patients with type 2 diabetes: correlation with inflammatory and metabolic parameters. Pharmacogenomics J. 2013;13:514–22. http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/tpj.2012.43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Rajilić–Stojanović M, Biagi E, Heilig HGHJ, Kajander K, Kekkonen RA, Tims S, et al. Global and deep molecular analysis of microbiota signatures in fecal samples from patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:1792–801.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Genuth S, Alberti KGMM, Bennett P, Buse J, Defronzo R, Kahn R, et al. Follow-up report on the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:3160–7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14578255.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Million M, Angelakis E, Maraninchi M, Henry M, Giorgi R, Valero R, et al. Correlation between body mass index and gut concentrations of Lactobacillus reuteri, Bifidobacterium animalis, Methanobrevibacter smithii and Escherichia coli. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013;37:1460–6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23459324.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Louis P, Scott KP, Duncan SH, Flint HJ. Understanding the effects of diet on bacterial metabolism in the large intestine. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;102:1197–208. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17448155.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature. 2006;444:1027–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05414.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Schwiertz A, Taras D, Schäfer K, Beijer S, Bos NA, Donus C, et al. Microbiota and SCFA in lean and overweight healthy subjects. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010;18:190–5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19498350.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Everard A, Lazarevic V, Gaïa N, Johansson M, Ståhlman M, Backhed F, et al. Microbiome of prebiotic-treated mice reveals novel targets involved in host response during obesity. ISME J. 2014;8:2116–30. http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/ismej.2014.45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Frost G, Sleeth ML, Sahuri-Arisoylu M, Lizarbe B, Cerdan S, Brody L, et al. The short-chain fatty acid acetate reduces appetite via a central homeostatic mechanism. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3611. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24781306.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Perry RJ, Peng L, Barry NA, Cline GW, Zhang D, Cardone RL, et al. Acetate mediates a microbiome-brain-β-cell axis to promote metabolic syndrome. Nature. 2016;534:213–7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27279214.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Hui ST, Parks BW, Org E, Norheim F, Che N, Pan C, et al. The genetic architecture of NAFLD among inbred strains of mice. Elife. 2015;4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26067236.
  47. Baylin A, Campos H. The use of fatty acid biomarkers to reflect dietary intake. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2006;17:22–7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16407712.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Daniel H, Gholami AM, Berry D, Desmarchelier C, Hahne H, Loh G, et al. High-fat diet alters gut microbiota physiology in mice. ISME J. 2014;8:295–308. http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/ismej.2013.155.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN, Gootenberg DB, Button JE, Wolfe BE, et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2014;505:559–63. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3957428&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Alcock J, Lin HC. Fatty acids from diet and microbiota regulate energy metabolism. F1000Research. 2015;4:738. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27006755.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Mani V, Hollis JH, Gabler NK. 2013. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2013;10:6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23305038.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Summers LKM, Fielding BA, Bradshaw HA, Ilic V, Beysen C, Clark ML, et al. Substituting dietary saturated fat with polyunsaturated fat changes abdominal fat distribution and improves insulin sensitivity. Diabetologia. 2002;45:369–77. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11914742.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Kasai C, Sugimoto K, Moritani I, Tanaka J, Oya Y, Inoue H, et al. Comparison of the gut microbiota composition between obese and non-obese individuals in a Japanese population, as analyzed by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism and next-generation sequencing. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015;15:100. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26261039.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Juste C, Kreil DP, Beauvallet C, Guillot A, Vaca S, Carapito C, et al. Bacterial protein signals are associated with Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2014;63:1566–77. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24436141.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Bonder MJ, Kurilshikov A, Tigchelaar EF, Mujagic Z, Imhann F, Vila AV, et al. The effect of host genetics on the gut microbiome. Nat Genet. 2016. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27694959
  56. Eren AM, Sogin ML, Morrison HG, Vineis JH, Fisher JC, Newton RJ, et al. A single genus in the gut microbiome reflects host preference and specificity. ISME J. 2015;9:90–100. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24936765.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. McHardy IH, Goudarzi M, Tong M, Ruegger PM, Schwager E, Weger JR, et al. Integrative analysis of the microbiome and metabolome of the human intestinal mucosal surface reveals exquisite inter-relationships. Microbiome. 2013;1:17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24450808.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Poretsky R, Rodriguez-R LM, Luo C, Tsementzi D, Konstantinidis KT, Costello E, et al. Strengths and limitations of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing in revealing temporal microbial community dynamics. PLoS One. 2014;9, e93827. http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093827.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Goodrich JK, Waters JL, Poole AC, Sutter JL, Koren O, Blekhman R, et al. Human genetics shape the gut microbiome. Cell. 2014;159:789–99. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867414012410.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhou X, Meile L, Kreuzer M, Zeitz JO. The effect of saturated fatty acids on methanogenesis and cell viability of Methanobrevibacter ruminantium. Archaea. 2013;2013:106916. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23710130.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Bolnick DI, Snowberg LK, Hirsch PE, Lauber CL, Org E, Parks B, et al. Individual diet has sex-dependent effects on vertebrate gut microbiota. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4500. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25072318.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Org E, Mehrabian M, Parks BW, Shipkova P, Liu X, Drake TA, et al. Sex differences and hormonal effects on gut microbiota composition in mice. Gut Microbes. 2016;7:313–22. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27355107.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Haro C, Rangel-Zúñiga OA, Alcalá-Díaz JF, Gómez-Delgado F, Pérez-Martínez P, Delgado-Lista J, et al. Intestinal microbiota is influenced by gender and body mass index. PLoS One. 2016;11, e0154090. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27228093.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7:335–6. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3156573&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Bokulich NA, Subramanian S, Faith JJ, Gevers D, Gordon JI, Knight R, et al. Quality-filtering vastly improves diversity estimates from Illumina amplicon sequencing. Nat Methods. 2013;10:57–9. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3531572&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Edgar RC. Quality measures for protein alignment benchmarks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:2145–53. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2853116&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  67. McDonald D, Price MN, Goodrich J, Nawrocki EP, DeSantis TZ, Probst A, et al. An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. ISME J. 2012;6:610–8. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3280142&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Würtz P, Havulinna AS, Soininen P, Tynkkynen T, Prieto-Merino D, Tillin T, et al. Metabolite profiling and cardiovascular event risk: a prospective study of 3 population-based cohorts. Circulation. 2015;131:774–85. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25573147.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Ritchie SC, Würtz P, Nath AP, Abraham G, Havulinna AS, Fearnley LG, et al. The biomarker GlycA is associated with chronic inflammation and predicts long-term risk of severe infection. Cell Syst. 2015;1:293–301. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27136058.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:559. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19114008.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Langfelder P, Zhang B, Horvath S. Defining clusters from a hierarchical cluster tree: the Dynamic Tree Cut package for R. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:719–20. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18024473.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Langfelder P, Luo R, Oldham MC, Horvath S. Is my network module preserved and reproducible? PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7, e1001057. http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001057.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017