Skip to main content

Discovery of permuted and recently split transfer RNAs in Archaea



As in eukaryotes, precursor transfer RNAs in Archaea often contain introns that are removed in tRNA maturation. Two unrelated archaeal species display unique pre-tRNA processing complexity in the form of split tRNA genes, in which two to three segments of tRNAs are transcribed from different loci, then trans-spliced to form a mature tRNA. Another rare type of pre-tRNA, found only in eukaryotic algae, is permuted, where the 3' half is encoded upstream of the 5' half, and must be processed to be functional.


Using an improved version of the gene-finding program tRNAscan-SE, comparative analyses and experimental verifications, we have now identified four novel trans-spliced tRNA genes, each in a different species of the Desulfurococcales branch of the Archaea: tRNAAsp(GUC) in Aeropyrum pernix and Thermosphaera aggregans, and tRNALys(CUU) in Staphylothermus hellenicus and Staphylothermus marinus. Each of these includes features surprisingly similar to previously studied split tRNAs, yet comparative genomic context analysis and phylogenetic distribution suggest several independent, relatively recent splitting events. Additionally, we identified the first examples of permuted tRNA genes in Archaea: tRNAiMet(CAU) and tRNATyr(GUA) in Thermofilum pendens, which appear to be permuted in the same arrangement seen previously in red alga.


Our findings illustrate that split tRNAs are sporadically spread across a major branch of the Archaea, and that permuted tRNAs are a new shared characteristic between archaeal and eukaryotic species. The split tRNA discoveries also provide new clues to their evolutionary history, supporting hypotheses for recent acquisition via viral or other mobile elements.


Transfer RNA (tRNA) genes play an essential role in protein translation in all living cells. Among the various stages of maturation that are required to generate functional tRNAs, intron removal is a key processing event occurring in precursor tRNAs (pre-tRNAs) in eukaryotes and Archaea. While the majority of these introns are found one nucleotide downstream of the anticodon, some archaeal species have introns scattered among seemingly random, 'noncanonical' positions in tRNA genes. These noncanonical introns preserve a general bulge-helix-bulge (BHB) secondary structure that is similar to canonical introns [1], and are found almost exclusively in members of the phylum Crenarchaeota, with most species containing only a small number of noncanonical introns. The hyperthermophile Pyrobaculum aerophilum is an exceptional case, containing a total of 21 noncanonical introns in 46 tRNAs, more than four times as many as in any other species [1]. With the availability of four recently sequenced Pyrobaculum genomes (Pyrobaculum arsenaticum, Pyrobaculum calidifontis, Pyrobaculum islandicum, and Thermoproteus neutrophilus, to be reclassified as a Pyrobaculum species), it was found that P. calidifontis harbors a superlative total of over 70 tRNA introns, the vast majority being noncanonical [2, 3].

A separate but potentially related class of tRNAs requiring unusual processing was first found in Nanoarchaeum equitans, an obligate archaeal hyperthermophilic symbiont with an extremely small genome. It contains six trans-spliced split tRNAs, encoded by genes that are broken into halves and distantly separated in the genome [4, 5]. These trans-spliced tRNAs are similar to pre-tRNAs containing canonical or noncanonical introns in that they form a BHB secondary structure at the exon-splicing junction, which is likely processed by a common endonuclease [6]. Although this finding was considered an exceptional process in an unusual organism, the discovery of trans-spliced tRNAs in the free-living thermophilic crenarchaeon Caldivirga maquilingensis hints at a broader relevance [7, 8]. Unfortunately, the large evolutionary distance between N. equitans and C. maquilingensis, and the lack of similarity in characteristics between their split tRNAs limit estimates of their age and the genome dynamics that might be involved.

Atypical tRNAs are not limited to archaeal species. Permuted tRNAs with a 3' half positioned upstream of the 5' half, creating a BHB-like motif when paired at their termini, were identified in the genomes of several unicellular algae, including the red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae [9, 10]. Various hypotheses have been proposed to explain the existence of these introns and fragmented tRNA genes, including a possible archaeal origin [8, 1114]. However, the mechanism of their acquisition and biological significance is still not known.

With the increasing number of sequenced archaeal genomes, there are opportunities to uncover new cases of exceptional tRNA encoding, which could provide important clues to understanding the evolutionary origins and mechanistic details shared among trans-spliced, permuted, and atypical intron-containing tRNAs. Here we report two key discoveries with new evolutionary implications. First, we describe four novel trans-spliced tRNAs, distributed among half (4 out of 8) of the species with decoded genomes in the Desulfurococcales branch of the Crenarchaeota. Unlike the trans-spliced tRNAs previously observed in N. equitans and C. maquilingensis [4, 8], the genomic proximity of the newly discovered tRNA gene fragments suggests relatively recent introduction into these genomes. Second, we describe strong evidence for the first examples of permuted tRNAs in Archaea, which have striking resemblance to permuted tRNAs recently found in eukaryotic algal genomes. Our findings demonstrate that these special tRNA features are not as rare as once perceived, increasing their biological relevance as well as providing valuable additional data points for future efforts to determine their origins and required co-factors.


Split tRNAAsp(GUC) in Aeropyrum and Thermosphaera consist of adjacent halves

Our initial investigation focused on tRNAs with properties that place them at the extremes of archaeal tRNA characteristics. tRNA introns identified in sequenced archaeal genomes have sizes ranging from 11 to 129 nucleotides with a median of 15 nucleotides [2]. Besides introns of tRNATrp(GUC) that encode an embedded C/D box small RNA (sRNA) [1517], only one tRNA gene, tRNAAsp(GUC) of Aeropyrum pernix, contains an intron exceeding 100 nucleotides (Table S1 in Additional file 1). Using an archaeal-specific version of snoscan [18], and manual alignment to other predicted C/D box sRNAs in A. pernix and other archaeal species, we failed to find any trace of a C/D box sRNA that might explain the long tRNA intron. Promoter analyses revealed a strong signal in the middle of the tRNAAsp(GUC) intron, including both the transcription factor B response element and TATA box, encoded on the same strand as the tRNA gene. This high-confidence promoter prediction scores better than 88% of all predicted transcripts in the genome (Figure S1 in Additional file 1), better than 63% of the predicted promoters for annotated tRNA genes in A. pernix, and is highly similar to the promoter upstream of the 5' end of the tRNAAsp(GUC) gene (Table S2 in Additional file 1). The promoter's placement predicts a transcription start site 20 to 25 nucleotides upstream of the 3' end of the intron, consistent with production of a leader sequence of length and high G/C content that is similar to leaders found in the 3' halves of trans-spliced tRNA genes [5, 8]

With the aid of an improved version of tRNAscan-SE [19, 20], we found that tRNAAsp(GUC) can be modeled as a combination of two separate transcripts joined between position 37 and 38, the canonical intron position (Figure 1a, Table 1). Similar to other split tRNAs, a canonical BHB (helix-bulge-helix-bulge-helix - hBHBh') secondary structure at the exon-splicing junction is observed, followed by a 14-bp G/C-rich stem. RT-PCR with transcript-specific primers and sequencing of PCR-derived clones verify expression of the mature tRNA and the two tRNA halves (Figure 2a). To further confirm that the two halves are separate transcripts, we conducted northern analysis with specific probes antisense to the two halves and the full-length 199-nucleotide precursor tRNA. Results show that the two pre-tRNA halves are present at their expected sizes, as is the predicted mature tRNA (Figure 2b). Interestingly, an amplified RT-PCR product corresponding to the size of a 199-nucleotide pre-tRNAAsp(GUC) was observed, but its absence in the northern analysis suggests this is a very low abundance read-through transcript that may be spliced, but does not contribute significantly to the mature tRNA abundance. Thus, this tRNA may be a true evolutionary intermediate between the intron-spliced and trans-spliced forms.

Figure 1
figure 1

Predicted secondary structures of trans -spliced and permuted precursor tRNAs. (a) Mature tRNAAsp(GUC) in A. pernix and T. aggregans are formed by joining the 5' half and the 3' half at position 37/38 after splicing at the bulge-helix-bulge (BHB) motif. (b) The 5' half and the 3' half of trans-spliced tRNALys(CUU) in Staphylothermus hellenicus and S. marinus marinus join at position 30/31, same as the previously identified split tRNALys(CUU) in N. equitans [5]. (c) Circularized permuted tRNAiMet(CAU) and tRNATyr(GUA) in Thermofilum pendens have the 3' half located upstream of the 5' half separated by intervening sequences represented in green. The two fragments join at position 59/60, same as the T-Ψ-C loop permuted tRNAs in the red alga C. merolae [9]. Pre-tRNAAla(UGC) in C. merolae is shown for comparison. The 5' half of tRNA transcripts are represented in blue, the 3' halves in orange. Black arrows indicate positions of splicing. Anticodons are boxed in light blue.

Table 1 Summary of trans-spliced and permuted tRNAs
Figure 2
figure 2

RT-PCR and northern analysis of tRNAAsp(GUC) in A. pernix. (a) Expression analysis of mature tRNAAsp(GUC) (Mat), 5' half of pre-tRNAAsp(GUC) (5' h), and 3' half of pre-tRNAAsp(GUC) (3' h) using RT-PCR. M represents the 10-bp DNA ladder. The band sizes correspond to the sizes of the PCR products based on selected primers, but not the transcript sizes of the mature tRNA and the halves. Negative controls without reverse transcriptase (RT (-)) displayed no PCR products in comparison. (b) Northern analysis of tRNAAsp(GUC) using radiolabeled DNA probe that spans the mature tRNAAsp(GUC) and the region between the two fragments. The mature tRNA, 5' half transcript and the 3' half transcript are as marked. No expression was found corresponding to the 199-nucleotide transcript originally predicted as pre-tRNAAsp(GUC) with a 121-nucleotide intron. Bands at approximately 90 nucleotides and 125 nucleotides are expected due to cross-hybridization of highly similar tRNA sequences in other tRNA transcripts. M1 and M2 represent the 10-bp and 100-bp RNA ladders, respectively.

tRNAAsp(GUC) in A. pernix is the first example of a trans-spliced tRNA encoded by separate, but directly adjacent transcripts. Upon re-examination of all tRNAs in Archaea for a similar pattern, we found that the tRNAAsp(GUC) ortholog in Thermosphaera aggregans, a crenarchaeon in the same phylogenetic order Desulfurococcales, also appears to be split with the two halves joined at the canonical intron position (Figure 1a, Table 1). Similar to the arrangement in A. pernix, the 5' half of the T. aggregans split tRNA is located adjacent to the 3' half. Unlike A. pernix, the two halves are encoded on opposite strands in a convergently transcribed orientation (Figure 3).

Figure 3
figure 3

Proposed evolutionary relationship between tRNAAsp(GUC) in D. kamchatkensis , A. pernix , and T. aggregans. D. kamchatkensis has a typical linear tRNAAsp(GUC) which represents the likely ancestor of the split tRNAAsp(GUC) genes in A. pernix and T. aggregans. The 5' and 3' halves of pre-tRNAAsp(GUC) are located adjacent to each other in A. pernix and T. aggregans. The two halves in A. pernix are transcribed on the forward strand while those in T. aggregans are transcribed on opposite strands. Breaks in synteny were observed between the tRNA halves and upstream of the 5' half in A. pernix.

To get an evolutionary perspective on the lineage of this tRNA gene, we examined the syntenic region in Desulfurococcus kamchatkensis, the closest sequenced relative to T. aggregans. In both of these species, a sequence of three genes is present: eIF-2A, Nop10p, then tRNAAsp(GUC) (Figure 3). However, the end of the syntenic region occurs in the middle of the tRNAAsp(GUC), where apparently the ancestral, uninterrupted form of tRNAAsp(GUC) observed in D. kamchatkensis has been split and inverted in T. aggregans, by an unknown series of genome re-arrangement events. Examination of the tRNAAsp(GUC) genomic regions for syntenic blocks in the eight sequenced Desulfurococcales species showed that every species had genome rearrangements downstream of tRNAAsp(GUC), relative to every other species, and three had rearrangements upstream as well. The split tRNAAsp(GUC), along with many other tRNAs [21, 22], appear to be common positions for genome recombination and/or viral integration. Although A. pernix and T. aggregans are both Desulfurococcales, they are separated by four other species that are more closely related, but lack the split tRNAAsp(GUC). Given that none of the other six Desulfurococcales species have a split tRNAAsp(GUC), the most parsimonious explanation for these observations is that a tRNA-splitting event happened relatively recently in two independent instances among the Desulfurococcales (Figure 4). The agent causing the splitting event could be specific for these tRNA sequences, as there are only four nucleotide changes between the A. pernix and T. aggregans tRNA sequences. Notably, there are many more changes in length and sequence identity (20 nucleotide differences) in the complementary region required to join the split halves, thus disfavoring the possibility of recent lateral transfer of a precursor split tRNA gene. As such, these are likely to be the first compelling examples of 'late' acquisition of split tRNA genes based on proximal tRNA halves. Late acquisition has also been suggested recently based on comparative analyses of non-canonical tRNA introns [23].

Figure 4
figure 4

Phylogenetic distribution of trans -spliced and permuted tRNAs in Archaea. Trans-spliced tRNAs were identified in A. pernix, T. aggregans, S. marinus, and S. marinus in this study, in N. equitans by Randau and colleagues [4, 5], and in C. maquilingensis by Fujishima and colleagues [8] (highlighted in gray). Permuted tRNAs were found in T. pendens in this study (yellow), and are most similar to the permuted tRNAs found in Cyanidioschyzon merolae, a eukaryotic algal species that is not included in the tree but would be a distant outgroup to the archaea shown here. The phylogenetic tree was generated based on the concatenation of 23S and 16S ribosomal RNAs. Sequences were aligned using ClustalW [48]. Alignments were manually adjusted using Jalview [49] to remove introns. The maximum likelihood tree was computed using PhyML [50] with general time-reversible model of sequence evolution. Numbers at nodes represent non-parametric bootstrap values computed by PhyML [50] with 1,000 replications of the original dataset.

tRNALys(CUU) in Staphylothermus resembles its ortholog in Nanoarchaeum

Using an improved version of the tRNAscan-SE computer program [19, 20] (manuscript in preparation), we predicted 46 tRNAs in Staphylothermus marinus, including a missing tRNALys(CUU) gene and an extra, low-scoring tRNALeu(CAA) prediction (26.23 bits versus all other archaeal tRNAs score >30.0 bits). This suggested a potential tRNA isotype mis-assignment. Indeed, closer examination of the low-scoring tRNALeu(CAA) revealed an almost exact match to tRNALys(UUU) from position 30 to the 3' terminus, with no similarity upstream of position 30. The single difference between these two sequences is a U to C change, aligned to anticodon position 34 in tRNALys(UUU), consistent with the fragment being the 3' end of the missing tRNALys(CUU). Additional sequence similarity searches identified a candidate 5' half fragment of the tRNALys(CUU) encoded 4,500 nucleotides away (Table 1; Figure S2a in Additional file 1), ruling out the possibility of an extremely long polycistronic intron. Strong promoters matching the promoter consensus (better than 40% of other identified tRNA promoters) were found at the expected distance upstream of both candidate loci.

Intriguingly, the two halves of the candidate split tRNALys(CUU) in S. marinus join between position 30 and 31, precisely the same position as in the split tRNALys(CUU) of distantly related N. equitans (Table 1) [5]. A canonical BHB (hBHBh') secondary structure at the exon-splicing junction is also observed, just as in N. equitans tRNALys(CUU), followed by a perfect 13-nucleotide trans-pairing between the regions downstream of the 5' half and the upstream of the 3' half (Figure 1b). Fortuitously, the genome of another species in the genus Staphylothermus, S. hellenicus, was recently sequenced, enabling identification of the orthologous split tRNALys(CUU), closely resembling the counterpart in S. marinus (Figure 1b, Table 1). While the sequences of 3' halves in the two species are identical, there is one nucleotide difference near the end of the 5' tRNA half. The difference conserves a base pair in the trans-paired region, changing the predicted G-U pairing in S. marinus to a G-C pair in S. hellenicus (Figure 1b), further suggesting selective pressure to maintain a perfect 13-nucleotide trans interaction.

These two closely related Staphylothermus species give the first case in which the issue of genome stability and split tRNAs may be examined. The neighboring genes located upstream of the 5' half (Smar_1316-Smar_1321, Shell_1133-Shell_1128), in between the 5' and 3' halves (Smar_1322 - Smar_1326, Shell_1127 - Shell_1123), and downstream of the 3' half (Smar_1327 - Smar_1332, Shell_1122 - Shell_1116) retain complete synteny between species, showing a lack of recombination or integration events in this region (Figure S2 in Additional file 1). However, tRNA genes are known to be positions of genome rearrangement due to processes including transposon and viral integration [21, 2426]. For context, we examined genome rearrangement events adjacent to the other 45 ortholog pairs of tRNAs, and found that 20 of them (44%) had a break in synteny either upstream, downstream, or on both sides of the tRNAs. Thus, the split tRNALys(CUU) arrangement since the divergence of S. marinus and S. hellenicus has been preserved with no local recombination, and is consistent with hypotheses proposing enhanced genome stability from split tRNAs.

Permuted tRNAs in Thermofilum pendens have the same structure as in red alga

We computationally screened for other atypical tRNA transcripts by aligning tRNAs and their upstream promoter regions to identify unusual spacing between candidate promoters and predicted tRNA genes. When applied to the thermophilic crenarchaeon Thermofilum pendens, we found that the promoters of 44 mature tRNA genes, out of a total of 46 in the genome, are located in the upstream region between 30 and 49 nucleotides relative to the 5' end of the mature tRNAs (Figure S3 in Additional file 1), explained by natural variation in the lengths of 5' leaders of pre-tRNAs. The promoters of two outliers, tRNAiMet(CAU) and tRNATyr(GUA), were found at positions -72 and -65, respectively, implying 5' leaders at least 16 nucleotides longer than all others. Similar to the initial prediction of the split tRNA in S. marinus, tRNAiMet(CAU) and tRNATyr(GUA) in T. pendens scored relatively low (26.23 and 32.76 bits, respectively, compared to >60 bits for other tRNA genes in this genome). Secondary structure analysis showed that these tRNA predictions fail to form requisite tRNA cloverleaf secondary structure at the T-Ψ-C loop and the acceptor stem.

Results from an improved version of tRNAscan-SE [19, 20] showed that the original predictions of tRNAiMet(CAU) and tRNATyr(GUA) in T. pendens are only the 5' halves of these tRNA genes. For each tRNA, a precisely matching 3' half was found between the 5' half and its predicted promoter on the same strand, suggesting that the two fragments belong to the same transcript, using a single promoter (Figure S3 in Additional file 1). Primary and secondary structure analyses strongly support that these are circularly permuted tRNAs with a BHB motif at the exon-splicing junction, located between positions 59 and 60. Unexpectedly, the split position is precisely the same as the T-Ψ-C loop-permuted tRNAs identified in the distantly related eukaryotic alga C. merolae (Figure 1c) [9]. The intervening sequences between the 3' and 5' halves of tRNAiMet(CAU) and tRNATyr(GUA) in T. pendens are 7 nucleotides and 1 nucleotide long, respectively, in comparison to intervening sequences in known algal permuted tRNAs ranging from 5 nucleotides to 85 nucleotides. Both of the genes also include a canonical intron, indicating that permuted tRNA structure and normal intron splicing are not exclusive processes. Unlike the permuted tRNAs in eukaryotes, these two archaeal tRNAs have genomically encoded 3'-terminal CCA sequences, and the tRNA sequences are quite different from those found in red alga, ruling out a recent inter-domain transfer between algal and archaeal species. However, the sequences and proteins flanking these tRNAs share strongest similarity to species outside of the Thermoproteales, suggesting these may have been part of laterally transferred regions acquired after the divergence from other sequenced Thermoproteales. Both tRNAiMet(CAU) and tRNATyr(GUA) are single-copy genes in T. pendens with essential decoding functions that cannot be supplanted by other tRNAs, indicating that processing of permuted genes is an essential activity in this species.


RNA trans-splicing, a processing event that joins two separate transcripts, was first discovered in the messenger RNAs of trypanosomes [27], Caenorhabditis elegans [28], and more recently in human endometrial stromal cells [29]. With the surprising discovery of trans-spliced tRNAs encoded in the minimal genome of N. equitans [4], and the most recent identification in a single unrelated crenarchaeal species [8], the broader significance and phylogenetic scope of these intriguing RNAs has remained uncertain. Our discovery of four novel trans-spliced tRNAs and two novel permuted tRNA genes greatly expands the total number of rearranged tRNAs in the Archaea to 18, in seven different species [4, 8]. All archaeal trans-spliced tRNAs have been found either in the crenarchaeal orders Desulfurococcales or Thermoproteales (Figure 4), or in N. equitans, an endosymbiont of a Desulfurococcales species [30]. A re-examination of tRNA predictions in all sequenced genomes in the Crenarchaeota did not show any additional trans-spliced or permuted tRNAs, although we expect many more examples as the pace of new genome sequencing accelerates [31].

Whether there are ecological or genetic characters that distinguish organisms with split or permuted tRNA genes from organisms that lack such tRNA variants is an open and interesting question. Among the seven species now identified as harboring split tRNAs, the most conspicuous ecological trait is that all are hyperthermophiles. Soon after the discovery of split tRNAs in N. equitans and permuted tRNAs in C. merolae, Randau and Söll suggested that split tRNA genes, like tRNA introns, present a strategy for preventing the integration of viral genomes or other mobile elements into otherwise conserved tRNA genes [11, 32]. This is particularly relevant for tRNAs in hyperthermophiles, which must preserve a high number of strong G-C hydrogen bonds in stems in order to maintain stable secondary structure. In combination with the many other tRNA sequence identity elements needed for proper modification, aminoacylation, and decoding function, this further limits sequence diversity, making thermophile tRNAs more similar to each other than in non-thermophiles. For example, there are just seven nucleotide changes in the mature tRNALys(CUU) between the phylogenetically distant Nanoarchaeum and Staphylothermus split tRNA orthologs (Figure 1). However, it is worth noting that many euryarchaeal hyperthermophiles (for example, Pyrococcus spp.) with similar constraints on tRNA G/C content do not exhibit unusual tRNA variants. Thus, the genomic or ecological factors that distinguish crenarchaeal species with many unusual tRNAs bear further investigation.

One important distinguishing feature among the major clades of Archaea involves differences in the makeup of their tRNA splicing endonuclease complexes [3335]. In the korarchaea and almost all of the sequenced euryarchaea, the endonuclease is constituted by just one protein, as either a homodimer (α2) or homotetramer (α4) [35]. In contrast, the crenarchaea, thaumarchaea, and N. equitans contain two proteins that form a heterotetramer endonuclease (α2β2) [6, 3638]. Recent studies have shown that the splicing endonuclease that removes introns from pre-tRNAs in N. equitans and C. maquilingensis also processes split tRNAs [6, 8]. Our discovery of new split tRNAs only in the crenarchaea strengthens a correlation between split tRNAs and the heterotetrameric form of tRNA endonuclease.

Pre-tRNAs across the archaeal phyla (Crenarchaeota, Thaumarchaeota, Nanoarchaeota, Korarchaeota and three thermophilic euryarchaeal methanogens) contain introns located at canonical as well as noncanonical positions [13, 39]. The majority of pre-tRNAs have zero or one intron, although some include two or even three introns [2, 3]. Most of these multi-intronic pre-tRNAs have been identified in Pyrobaculum and Thermofilum, contributing to the highest tRNA intron counts observed in Archaea in these genera. However, none of the five sequenced Pyrobaculum species have any trans-spliced or permuted tRNAs. C. maquilingensis and N. equitans have the most split tRNAs (six), yet each has a relatively small numbers of tRNA introns. We concur with prior suggestions that the evolutionary selective pressures to maintain intronic or split tRNAs may be similar [11]; however, the specific genetic component or environmental vector(s) necessary for acquisition or maintenance of split versus intronic tRNAs are potentially quite different. Discovery of split or permuted tRNAs in five new species allows more focused searches for requisite proteins, protein variants, or genomic properties that correspond to the species that support these types of pre-tRNA variants. For example, it is now reasonably clear that small genome size, an important feature of N. equitans where split tRNAs were discovered [4], is not strongly correlated with split tRNAs: C. maquilingensis and the four Desulfurococcales identified with split tRNAs in this study do not have exceptionally small genomes among the crenarchaea.

The relative age of tRNA introns and split tRNAs has been a matter of open debate as well. Di Giulio [40, 41] proposed that split tRNAs such as those in N. equitans are the ancestral forms of the single-locus tRNA genes observed in most genomes. Sugahara et al. [3] have suggested that the conserved intron sequences observed in Pyrobaculum support a late, rather than early origin for tRNA introns. In this study, instances of split tRNAAsp(GUC) from species in different genera, and instances of split tRNALys(CUU) from species within the same genus suggest multiple, relatively recent splitting or lateral transfer events within the Desulfurococcales. These are fundamentally different from prior examples of split tRNAs in several respects: the split halves are adjacent or relatively close in the genome, there is just one split tRNA per genome, and an orthologous split tRNA exists to help gauge the age and stability of flanking sequences. Careful examination of the exon-splicing junctions reveals that tRNALys(CUU) in S. marinus and S. hellenicus are ancestrally related and occur in a syntenic region of their genomes that has been stable since their divergence. Examination of the disparate exon-splicing junctions between tRNAAsp(GUC) in A. pernix and T. aggregans suggests two different local genome rearrangement events, created by a viral or mobile element that targets precisely the same position in the same tRNA. Viral genes that have integrated within tRNA genes have been identified in the euryarchaeal species Thermococcus kodakarensis KOD1 and Methanococcus voltae A3 [21]. Integrated elements that overlap tRNA genes have also been found in Sulfolobus and A. pernix [22, 26]. We observed six partial tRNA fragments in A. pernix and one in T. aggregans (Table S3 in Additional file 1), potentially due to other recent viral integrations or rearrangements at tRNA loci.


The trans-spliced and permuted tRNAs identified in this study indicate that rearrangement of tRNA genes is relatively common in at least one major branch of the thermophilic crenarchaea. Interactions between pre-tRNA splicing, 5' and 3' trimming of pre-tRNAs, tRNA modification, and tRNA editing have not been thoroughly investigated, but these present multiple related processes that may modulate the ability to support split or permuted tRNAs. The discovery of the six uniquely rearranged tRNAs in the Archaea presents new opportunities to study their evolution via their genomic context and basic sequence attributes. Based on these new examples, improved methods for detection, and increasing availability of sequenced genomes, we anticipate numerous additional split or permuted tRNAs will be identified for future study. The recent genomic events leading to formation of the split tRNAs described here illustrate an active, contemporary process in tRNA evolution.

Materials and methods

Genomic data

Complete genomic sequences of A. pernix, S. hellenicus, S. marinus, T. pendens, and T. aggregans were obtained from NCBI RefSeq (accession numbers [NC_000854], [NC_014205], [NC_009033], [NC_008698], and [NC_014160]).

tRNA gene prediction

Trans-spliced and permuted tRNAs were predicted using an improved version of tRNAscan-SE (manuscript in preparation) [19, 20]. Archaeal tRNA-specific and BHB motif covariance models were created for similarity searching using Infernal 1.0 [42] after pre-filtering possible candidates with tRNAscan [43] and an A/B box motif detection algorithm [44]. A default cut-off score was set to 20 bits.

Promoter identification

To generate a training set for promoter identification, potential operons were predicted genome-wide with the requirement of a minimum intergenic separation of at least 100 nucleotides (on the same strand). A 16-mer motif search of the 90 nucleotides upstream of known genes (not annotated as putative or hypothetical genes) using MEME [45] was conducted to identify the consensus promoter, including the transcription factor B response element (one to three adenosines) plus the TATA box. A position-specific scoring matrix was generated from the alignments of the MEME results after manual inspection. Each organism's position-specific scoring matrix was used to scan the 150-bp upstream region of all non-coding and protein-coding genes to identify potential promoter regions. Ten virtual genomes for each target genome were generated using a fifth-order Markov chain to retain the base frequency of the target genome, and scanned to identify the score distribution of false positives. The promoter candidates identified were filtered according to expected position [46] and a threshold P-value equivalent to that of the lowest-scoring known gene.

Culture conditions for Aeropyrum pernix

A. pernix K1 was obtained from Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany). A. pernix cultures were grown in TY medium (0.4% tryptone, 0.2% yeast extract, pH 7) supplemented with 3.86 mM sodium thiosulfate [47]. These cultures were incubated aerobically at 90°C and collected at mid- to late-log phase. Cell pellets were frozen in liquid N2 and stored at -80°C.

Total RNA preparation

Total RNA was extracted from the frozen cell pellets using a Polytron tissue homogenizer and TRI Reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). RNA samples were treated with TURBO DNase (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) to remove any residual DNA, re-extracted with TRI Reagent, and normalized to 1.5 μg/μl.

Genomic DNA preparation

Cell pellets were incubated overnight in SNET lysis buffer (400 mM NaCl, 1% SDS, 20 mM Tris-Cl, 5 mM EDTA) with 400 μg/ml proteinase K at 55°C. Genomic DNA was then extracted from cell lysate using phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol. DNA samples were treated with RNaseA to remove any residual RNA and re-extracted with phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol.

RT-PCR and sequencing

Total RNA from A. pernix was denatured at 100°C for 5 minutes and cooled on ice for 5 minutes. First strand cDNAs were synthesized from denatured total RNA using gene-specific reverse primers and Superscript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at 65°C for 30 minutes according to the manufacturer's instructions. These cDNA templates were PCR-amplified using forward and reverse primers spanning the mature tRNAs, the 5' tRNA halves, and the 3' tRNA halves. PCR parameters for 30 cycle amplification were as follows: denaturing at 94°C for 30 seconds, annealing at 68°C for 30 seconds, and extension at 72°C for 30 seconds, using AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Negative controls for the reactions were conducted under the same conditions concurrently, but without the addition of reverse transcriptase at the first strand cDNA synthesis step. PCR products were cloned with the pCR-2.1-TOPO cloning kit (Invitrogen). Plasmid DNA was extracted using Zyppy plasmid miniprep kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA). DNA samples were sequenced at the University of California Berkeley DNA Sequencing Facility. Primers used for RT-PCR are as follows: forward primer for mature tRNAAsp(GUC) in A. pernix and its 5' half, 5'-CGCGGTAGTATAGCCTGGA-3'; forward primer for 3' half of tRNAAsp(GUC) in A. pernix, 5'-CGGGCCTGCGGAGAG-3'; reverse primer for mature tRNAAsp(GUC) in A. pernix and its 3' half, 5'-GCGGCCGGGATTTGAAC-3'; reverse primer for 5' half of tRNAAsp(GUC) in A. pernix, 5'-GCGGGGCCCTTGACAG-3'.

Northern blot analysis

Five micrograms of total RNA extracted from A. pernix cell cultures was denatured for 3 minutes at 90°C in an equal volume of 95% formamide gel loading buffer (Ambion), resolved on an 8% polyacryamide-urea gel by electrophoresis, and blotted onto Hybond N+ membrane (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA) by overnight electro-transfer. A 239-nucleotide sequence including the A. pernix tRNAAsp(GUC) and the region between the two fragments was amplified by PCR using A. pernix genomic DNA and gene-specific primers Sn-Ape-tRNA-Asp (5'-CCCAGTGGTAAGATATGTGAACC-3') and Asn-Ape-tRNA-Asp (5'-GGCCGCGAGGATTATTG-3'). The resulting PCR product served as the template for generating single-stranded, [α-32P]-ATP-labeled DNA probes by linear PCR using Asn-Ape-tRNA-Asp. Hybridizations were carried out at 42°C in UltraHyb buffer (Ambion). Hybridization patterns were determined using a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).





base pair




precursor transfer RNAs


small RNA


transfer RNA.


  1. Marck C, Grosjean H: Identification of BHB splicing motifs in intron-containing tRNAs from 18 archaea: evolutionary implications. RNA. 2003, 9: 1516–1531. 10.1261/rna.5132503.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chan PP, Lowe TM: GtRNAdb: a database of transfer RNA genes detected in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37: D93–97. 10.1093/nar/gkn787.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sugahara J, Kikuta K, Fujishima K, Yachie N, Tomita M, Kanai A: Comprehensive analysis of archaeal tRNA genes reveals rapid increase of tRNA introns in the order thermoproteales. Mol Biol Evol. 2008, 25: 2709–2716. 10.1093/molbev/msn216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Randau L, Munch R, Hohn MJ, Jahn D, Soll D: Nanoarchaeum equitans creates functional tRNAs from separate genes for their 5'- and 3'-halves. Nature. 2005, 433: 537–541. 10.1038/nature03233.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Randau L, Pearson M, Soll D: The complete set of tRNA species in Nanoarchaeum equitans. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579: 2945–2947. 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.04.051.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Randau L, Calvin K, Hall M, Yuan J, Podar M, Li H, Soll D: The heteromeric Nanoarchaeum equitans splicing endonuclease cleaves noncanonical bulge-helix-bulge motifs of joined tRNA halves. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 17934–17939. 10.1073/pnas.0509197102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McClay JL, van den Oord EJ: Split genes uncovered through science fusion. Heredity. 2005, 95: 1–2. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800682.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujishima K, Sugahara J, Kikuta K, Hirano R, Sato A, Tomita M, Kanai A: Tri-split tRNA is a transfer RNA made from 3 transcripts that provides insight into the evolution of fragmented tRNAs in archaea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106: 2683–2687. 10.1073/pnas.0808246106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Soma A, Onodera A, Sugahara J, Kanai A, Yachie N, Tomita M, Kawamura F, Sekine Y: Permuted tRNA genes expressed via a circular RNA intermediate in Cyanidioschyzon merolae. Science. 2007, 318: 450–453. 10.1126/science.1145718.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Maruyama S, Sugahara J, Kanai A, Nozaki H: Permuted tRNA genes in the nuclear and nucleomorph genomes of photosynthetic eukaryotes. Mol Biol Evol. 2010, 27: 1070–1076. 10.1093/molbev/msp313.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Randau L, Soll D: Transfer RNA genes in pieces. EMBO Rep. 2008, 9: 623–628. 10.1038/embor.2008.101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Di Giulio M: Permuted tRNA genes of Cyanidioschyzon merolae, the origin of the tRNA molecule and the root of the Eukarya domain. J Theor Biol. 2008, 253: 587–592. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.04.022.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Di Giulio M: A comparison among the models proposed to explain the origin of the tRNA molecule: a synthesis. J Mol Evol. 2009, 69: 1–9. 10.1007/s00239-009-9248-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sugahara J, Fujishima K, Morita K, Tomita M, Kanai A: Disrupted tRNA gene diversity and possible evolutionary scenarios. J Mol Evol. 2009, 69: 497–504. 10.1007/s00239-009-9294-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Omer AD, Lowe TM, Russell AG, Ebhardt H, Eddy SR, Dennis PP: Homologs of small nucleolar RNAs in Archaea. Science. 2000, 288: 517–522. 10.1126/science.288.5465.517.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Clouet d'Orval B, Bortolin ML, Gaspin C, Bachellerie JP: Box C/D RNA guides for the ribose methylation of archaeal tRNAs. The tRNATrp intron guides the formation of two ribose-methylated nucleosides in the mature tRNATrp. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29: 4518–4529. 10.1093/nar/29.22.4518.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh SK, Gurha P, Tran EJ, Maxwell ES, Gupta R: Sequential 2'-O-methylation of archaeal pre-tRNATrp nucleotides is guided by the intron-encoded but trans-acting box C/D ribonucleoprotein of pre-tRNA. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 47661–47671. 10.1074/jbc.M408868200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lowe TM, Eddy SR: A computational screen for methylation guide snoRNAs in yeast. Science. 1999, 283: 1168–1171. 10.1126/science.283.5405.1168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lowe TM, Eddy SR: tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 955–964. 10.1093/nar/25.5.955.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. tRNAscan-SE. []

  21. Krupovic M, Bamford DH: Archaeal proviruses TKV4 and MVV extend the PRD1-adenovirus lineage to the phylum Euryarchaeota. Virology. 2008, 375: 292–300. 10.1016/j.virol.2008.01.043.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. She Q, Brugger K, Chen L: Archaeal integrative genetic elements and their impact on genome evolution. Res Microbiol. 2002, 153: 325–332. 10.1016/S0923-2508(02)01331-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fujishima K, Sugahara J, Tomita M, Kanai A: Large-scale tRNA intron transposition in the archaeal order Thermoproteales represents a novel mechanism of intron gain. Mol Biol Evol. 2010, 27: 2233–2243. 10.1093/molbev/msq111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Reiter WD, Palm P, Yeats S: Transfer RNA genes frequently serve as integration sites for prokaryotic genetic elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989, 17: 1907–1914. 10.1093/nar/17.5.1907.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hall RM, Collis CM: Mobile gene cassettes and integrons: capture and spread of genes by site-specific recombination. Mol Microbiol. 1995, 15: 593–600.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. She Q, Peng X, Zillig W, Garrett RA: Gene capture in archaeal chromosomes. Nature. 2001, 409: 478-10.1038/35054138.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sutton RE, Boothroyd JC: Evidence for trans splicing in trypanosomes. Cell. 1986, 47: 527–535. 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90617-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Krause M, Hirsh D: A trans-spliced leader sequence on actin mRNA in C. elegans. Cell. 1987, 49: 753–761. 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90613-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Li H, Wang J, Mor G, Sklar J: A neoplastic gene fusion mimics trans-splicing of RNAs in normal human cells. Science. 2008, 321: 1357–1361. 10.1126/science.1156725.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Huber H, Hohn MJ, Rachel R, Fuchs T, Wimmer VC, Stetter KO: A new phylum of Archaea represented by a nanosized hyperthermophilic symbiont. Nature. 2002, 417: 63–67. 10.1038/417063a.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R, Dalin E, Ivanova NN, Kunin V, Goodwin L, Wu M, Tindall BJ, Hooper SD, Pati A, Lykidis A, Spring S, Anderson IJ, D'haeseleer P, Zemla A, Singer M, Lapidus A, Nolan M, Copeland A, Han C, Chen F, Cheng JF, Lucas S, Kerfeld C, Lang E, Gronow S, Chain P, Bruce D, et al: A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature. 2009, 462: 1056–1060. 10.1038/nature08656.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Heinemann IU, Soll D, Randau L: Transfer RNA processing in archaea: Unusual pathways and enzymes. FEBS Lett. 2010, 584: 303–309. 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.10.067.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Biniszkiewicz D, Cesnaviciene E, Shub DA: Self-splicing group I intron in cyanobacterial initiator methionine tRNA: evidence for lateral transfer of introns in bacteria. EMBO J. 1994, 13: 4629–4635.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Abelson J, Trotta CR, Li H: tRNA splicing. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 12685–12688. 10.1074/jbc.273.21.12685.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Li H, Trotta CR, Abelson J: Crystal structure and evolution of a transfer RNA splicing enzyme. Science. 1998, 280: 279–284. 10.1126/science.280.5361.279.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Yoshinari S, Shiba T, Inaoka DK, Itoh T, Kurisu G, Harada S, Kita K, Watanabe Y: Functional importance of crenarchaea-specific extra-loop revealed by an X-ray structure of a heterotetrameric crenarchaeal splicing endonuclease. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37: 4787–4798. 10.1093/nar/gkp506.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Mitchell M, Xue S, Erdman R, Randau L, Soll D, Li H: Crystal structure and assembly of the functional Nanoarchaeum equitans tRNA splicing endonuclease. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37: 5793–5802. 10.1093/nar/gkp537.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Okuda M, Shiba T, Inaoka DK, Kita K, Kurisu G, Mineki S, Harada S, Watanabe Y, Yoshinari S: A conserved lysine residue in the crenarchaea-specific loop is important for the crenarchaeal splicing endonuclease activity. J Mol Biol. 2011, 405: 92–104. 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.10.050.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hallam SJ, Konstantinidis KT, Putnam N, Schleper C, Watanabe Y, Sugahara J, Preston C, de la Torre J, Richardson PM, DeLong EF: Genomic analysis of the uncultivated marine crenarchaeote Cenarchaeum symbiosum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103: 18296–18301. 10.1073/pnas.0608549103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Di Giulio M: The split genes of Nanoarchaeum equitans are an ancestral character. Gene. 2008, 421: 20–26. 10.1016/j.gene.2008.06.010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Di Giulio M: Formal proof that the split genes of tRNAs of Nanoarchaeum equitans are an ancestral character. J Mol Evol. 2009, 69: 505–511. 10.1007/s00239-009-9280-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Nawrocki EP, Kolbe DL, Eddy SR: Infernal 1.0: inference of RNA alignments. Bioinformatics. 2009, 25: 1335–1337. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Fichant GA, Burks C: Identifying potential tRNA genes in genomic DNA sequences. J Mol Biol. 1991, 220: 659–671. 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90108-I.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Pavesi A, Conterio F, Bolchi A, Dieci G, Ottonello S: Identification of new eukaryotic tRNA genes in genomic DNA databases by a multistep weight matrix analysis of transcriptional control regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22: 1247–1256. 10.1093/nar/22.7.1247.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Bailey TL, Elkan C: Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol. 1994, 2: 28–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Slupska MM, King AG, Fitz-Gibbon S, Besemer J, Borodovsky M, Miller JH: Leaderless transcripts of the crenarchaeal hyperthermophile Pyrobaculum aerophilum. J Mol Biol. 2001, 309: 347–360. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4669.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Kim KW, Lee SB: Growth of the hyperthermophilic marine archaeon Aeropyrum pernix in a defined medium. J Biosci Bioeng. 2003, 95: 618–622.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG: Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007, 23: 2947–2948. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DM, Clamp M, Barton GJ: Jalview Version 2--a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics. 2009, 25: 1189–1191. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O: New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol. 2010, 59: 307–321. 10.1093/sysbio/syq010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Schneider KL, Pollard KS, Baertsch R, Pohl A, Lowe TM: The UCSC Archaeal Genome Browser. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: D407–410. 10.1093/nar/gkj134.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (HG004002-01A2 subaward to TL).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Todd M Lowe.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

PC identified trans-spliced and permuted tRNA genes, purified Aeropyrum total RNA and genomic DNA, performed all sequencing and northern analyses, and co-wrote the manuscript. AC grew Aeropyrum cultures, contributed ideas for experimental verifications, and co-edited the manuscript. TL guided the research study, performed tRNA synteny and evolutionary analyses, and co-wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material


Additional file 1: Additional figures and tables in PDF format. Figure S1: predicted promoter score distribution in A. pernix. Figure S2: tRNALys(CUU) in (a) S. marinus and (b) S. hellenicus loci display strong synteny on the Archaeal Genome Browser [51]. Figure S3: alignment of tRNA promoters in T. pendens. Table S1: summary of pre-tRNA intron size in 90 archaeal genomes. Table S2: predicted promoters of tRNA genes in A. pernix. (DOC 5 MB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chan, P.P., Cozen, A.E. & Lowe, T.M. Discovery of permuted and recently split transfer RNAs in Archaea. Genome Biol 12, R38 (2011).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: