Skip to main content

The Heterochromatin Protein 1 family


Heterochromatin Protein 1 (HP1) was first discovered in Drosophila as a dominant suppressor of position-effect variegation and a major component of heterochromatin. The HP1 family is evolutionarily conserved, with members in fungi, plants and animals but not prokaryotes, and there are multiple members within the same species. The amino-terminal chromodomain binds methylated lysine 9 of histone H3, causing transcriptional repression. The highly conserved carboxy-terminal chromoshadow domain enables dimerization and also serves as a docking site for proteins involved in a wide variety of nuclear functions, from transcription to nuclear architecture. In addition to heterochromatin packaging, it is becoming increasingly clear that HP1 proteins have diverse roles in the nucleus, including the regulation of euchromatic genes. HP1 proteins are amenable to posttranslational modifications that probably regulate these distinct functions, thereby creating a subcode within the context of the 'histone code' of histone posttranslational modifications.

Gene organization and evolutionary history

Heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) was originally discovered through studies in Drosophila of the mosaic gene silencing that results when a euchromatic gene is placed near or within heterochromatin, the condensed state of chromatin that is a cytologically visible condition of heritable gene repression [1, 2]. This phenomenon is known as position-effect variegation (PEV), and HP1 is a dominant suppressor of it. The HP1 family of non-histone chromosomal proteins are involved in the establishment and maintenance of higher-order chromatin structures. Members of this evolutionarily conserved family have been discovered in almost all eukaryotic organisms, from fission yeast to plants to humans (Figure 1). An HP1 protein has not been observed in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), in which PEV is generated by the silent information regulatory (SIR) proteins [3]. The fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe) and Neurospora genomes each contain one HP1 homolog, Dictyostelium has two, and different animal species have up to five. Over the length of the protein, there is 50% amino-acid sequence identity between mammalian HP1 proteins and Drosophila HP1 [4].

Figure 1

A phylogenetic tree of HP1 proteins. Species shown are Caenorhabditis elegans (Ce), Drosophila melanogaster (Dm), Drosophila virilis (Dv), Dictyostelium discoideum (Dd), Gallus gallus (Gg), Homo sapiens (Hs), Mus musculus (Mm), Neurospora crassa (Nc), Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Sp) and Xenopus laevis (Xl). Most animal species have several HP1 isoforms, but those in Drosophila and C. elegans are not generally orthologous with particular mammalian isoforms. The tree was adapted from the combined data from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Pfam protein family database [76] and Simple Modular Architecture Research Tool (SMART) database [77].

The HP1 family of proteins is encoded by a class of genes known as the chromobox (CBX) genes. There are three distinct proteins in the mammalian HP1 family, each of which is encoded by its own gene. In humans, HP1α is encoded by the Chromobox homolog 5 (CBX5) gene located on chromosome 12q13.13 [5]. The genes for HP1β (CBX1) and HP1γ (CBX3) are located on chromosomes 17q21.32 and 7p15.2, respectively. The murine Cbx5, Cbx1 and Cbx3 genes are located within syntenic regions of the mouse genome to the orthologous human genes: 15qF3, 11qD and 6qB3, respectively [6]. This conserved synteny shows that HP1 proteins have evolved under stringent evolutionary pressures, indicating that their function has been carefully selected. CBX5, CBX1 and CBX3 encode proteins with distinct localization patterns, however, despite being approximately 65% identical [7].

Interestingly, the genomic structure of HP1-encoding genes is conserved from Drosophila to humans. The gene encoding Drosophila HP1, known as Su(var)2-5, along with the genes encoding mouse HP1s (Cbx5, Cbx1 and Cbx3) and human HP1s (CBX5, CBX1 and CBX3), each comprise five exons separated by four introns [5, 8] (Figure 2a). The translational start site is conserved within exon 2, but because of an extra intron within exon 1 of murine Cbx3, its translational start site is in exon 3 [8]. Except for murine Cbx3, the sequence encoding the chromodomain is in exons 2 and 3. Exons 3 and 4 of murine Cbx3 have fused into exon 4, so its chromodomain is encoded within exons 3 and 4. The chromoshadow domain is encoded in exons 4 and 5 for all members of the family [8]. Although the splice-site sequences are conserved across the mammalian HP1 family, the splice sites in Drosophila are distinct, suggesting that the genomic structure has been conserved without maintaining intron-exon boundaries.

Figure 2

Structure of HP1 proteins and the genes encoding them. (a) The conserved genomic structure of HP1-encoding genes from Drosophila to humans. Each gene is made up of five exons separated by four introns. The start (ATG) and stop codons are indicated. The exons encoding the chromodomain and the chromoshadow domain are indicated by brackets and arrows. Asterisks mark where murine Cbx3 (encoding HP1γ) differs from the arrangement shown: the start codon is in exon 3 and the chromodomain is encoded by exons 3 and 4 of this gene. (b) The conserved linear structure of HP1 proteins. N, amino terminus; C, carboxy terminus. (c) The overall three-dimensional structures of the chromodomain and chromoshadow domain of murine HP1β. Coordinates were downloaded from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) structural database and modeled using the Insight II program from Accelrys [78].

In addition to the three main HP1-coding genes in vertebrates, numerous HP1 pseudogenes have been discovered [5, 8, 9]. For example, in humans there is one CBX5 pseudogene, at least five CBX1 pseudogenes and eleven CBX3 pseudogenes. The scattering of pseudogenes throughout the genome suggests that HP1-like sequences have been duplicated multiple times during evolution.

The HP1 family is part of a larger superfamily of proteins containing chromatin organization modifier (chromo)domains. The chromodomain is an evolutionarily conserved region in the amino-terminal half of HP1 proteins, of approximately 30-60 amino acids [10]. All proteins containing this domain can characteristically alter the structure of chromatin to make heterochromatin. The chromodomain of HP1 shares greater than 60% amino-acid sequence identity with the chromodomain found in Polycomb, a silencer of homeotic genes [11]. Substituting the chromodomains of Polycomb and HP1 for each other changes their nuclear localization patterns accordingly, thus implicating the chromodomain in both target-site binding and target preference [12]. Sequences encoding chromodomain-containing proteins have been discovered in the genomes of animals and plants, suggesting that the chromodomain has a highly conserved structural role.

The HP1 proteins form their own family within the chromodomain superfamily, characterized by the presence of a second unique conserved domain in the carboxy-terminal half of the protein, known as the chromoshadow domain [13]. This domain shares amino-acid sequence identity with the chromodomain, but it has different functions (see below). The high level of similarity between the two types of domain suggests, however, that HP1-encoding genes could have arisen from a duplication of one of these domain sequences. Through evolution, one domain, more likely the chromoshadow domain, then diverged enough to facilitate distinct functions.

Although there are relatively few members of the HP1 family, considering their evolutionary longevity, their functional importance in evolution is clear. In cross-species experiments, the chromodomain from mouse HP1β can functionally replace the chromodomain of S. pombe HP1 [14], and expression of human HP1α can rescue the lethality of homozygous mutants in the Drosophila HP1-encoding gene Su(var)2-5 [5]. This high degree of conservation within two regions, the chromodomain in the amino-terminal half and the chromoshadow domain in the carboxy-terminal half, suggests that these domains are at the core of HP1 function and of the interaction of HP1 proteins with other molecules in the formation of condensed chromatin structure.

Characteristic structural features

The chromodomain superfamily, which contains the HP1 family, can be subdivided into three major classes on the basis of domain organization [13]. One class, characterized by the presence of a single chromodomain, includes Polycomb and mammalian modifier 3. A second class is identified by paired tandem chromodomains, as found in DNA-binding/helicase proteins, such as yeast CHD1 and mammalian CHD-1 to CHD-4. The third class consists of proteins containing both a chromodomain and the highly related chromoshadow domain, which includes all members of the HP1 family.

The sequence and structure of HP1 proteins can be divided into three regions (Figure 2b). First, the chromodomain is a module at the amino terminus that is responsible for HP1 binding to di- and trimethylated lysine 9 (K9 in the single-letter amino-acid code) of histone H3; these methyl groups are epigenetic marks for gene silencing [15, 16]. Second, the carboxy-terminal chromoshadow domain is involved in homo- and/or heterodimerization and interaction with other proteins. Third, the chromodomain is separated from the chromoshadow domain by a variable linker or hinge region containing a nuclear localization sequence. Each of these three segments will be discussed in detail from a structural perspective.

The chromodomain

The structure of the amino-terminal chromodomain alone has been analyzed by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy [17]. The domain folds into a globular conformation approximately 30 Å in diameter, consisting of an antiparallel three-stranded β sheet packed against an α helix in the carboxy-terminal segment of the domain [17] (Figure 2c). A hydrophobic groove is formed on one side of the β sheet, which is composed of conserved nonpolar residues. Interestingly, comparison of this structure with the databases reveals a similar structure in two archaeal histone-like proteins, Sac7d and Sso7d [17]. This structure in Sac7d binds to the major groove of DNA in a nonspecific manner as a result of the net positive charge on the exterior of the β sheet. Unlike these archaeal DNA-binding proteins, however, in HP1 the β sheet has an overall negative charge, implicating the chromodomain as a protein-interaction motif rather than a DNA-binding motif.

The gene-silencing function of HP1 depends on an interaction between the chromodomain and the methyl K9 histone H3 mark [12, 18]. The hydrophobic pocket of the chromodomain provides the appropriate environment for docking onto this methylated residue. The bound segment of the H3 tail adopts a β-strand conformation, lying coplanar to and antiparallel with two β strands of the chromodomain, which completes a three-stranded β sheet [19, 20]. In addition, the methylammonium group in K9 is effectively caged by three aromatic side chains, whereas the surrounding residues of K9 contact specific sites within the chromodomain. This positioning makes sense of the functional defects and loss of methyl K9 binding upon mutation of key hydrophobic amino acids located in the amino-terminal part of Drosophila HP1 (Tyr24, Val26, Trp45 and Tyr48) [20]. Interestingly, no other combinations of naturally occurring amino acids have been found that interact with the chromodomain, indicating that the methylated histone mark is the sole binding partner for this domain [21].

Methylation occurs on other lysines within histone H3, as well as the other histones. In fact, methylation on K27 of H3 occurs within a highly similar amino-acid sequence context as K9 - ARKS. This mark on K27 serves as a binding site for the Polycomb chromodomain [22]. The discrimination between these two highly related repressive marks has been examined [23]. The chromodomains of HP1 and Polycomb are structured similarly, but their peptide-binding grooves show distinct features that provide this discrimination. The main differences lie in the extent of protein-peptide interactions - Polycomb interacts with a larger number of the peptide residues surrounding the methyl lysine - and in context recognition, as HP1 finely discriminates the peptide residues in the immediate vicinity. Therefore, although the posttranslational mark, the surrounding histone sequence and the overall chromodomain structure are strikingly similar between them, the mode in which Polycomb and HP1 bind histone H3 and make essential interacting contacts are different.

The chromoshadow domain

The overall structure of the chromoshadow domain is very similar to that of the chromodomain, with a globular conformation of approximately the same size [24] (Figure 2c). Like the chromodomain, the chromoshadow domain is composed of three β strands to complete an antiparallel sheet. Unlike the chromodomain, which has a subsequent single α helix that folds against the sheet, the chromodomain has two carboxy-terminal α helices.

Although the chromodomain remains monomeric in solution, the chromoshadow domain readily dimerizes under the same conditions [25]. The dimer interface involves a symmetrical interaction on helix α2, which lies at an angle of 35° to helix α2 of the other HP1 molecule [24]. Conserved residues that are unique to the chromoshadow domain are located at the dimer interface. As a result, this dimer structure creates a nonpolar groove that can accommodate HP1-interacting proteins containing the consensus sequence PXVXL [24] (see below).

The linker region

The two highly conserved chromo- and chromoshadow domains are separated by a less conserved linker or hinge region. This region contains the most variable amino-acid sequence between HP1 proteins, between proteins both from the same species and from different species. The structure of the linker region has been proposed to be flexible and exposed to the surface [26]. The variable nature of this region has been resulted in some difficulty in capturing its three-dimensional structure with a variety of methods.

The linker is highly amenable to posttranslational modifications, especially phosphorylation [2730]. In addition, modifications within this region have been shown to affect localization, interactions and function. The linker could therefore be a central control region in the regulation of HP1 proteins.

Localization and function

As its name suggests, the localization as well as the roles of HP1 proteins in heterochromatic regions have been well studied. More recent studies have made it increasingly clear, however, that HP1 proteins localize not only to heterochromatic regions but also to euchromatic regions [27, 3133]. This localization appears to be isoform-specific: in mammalian cells, HP1α and HP1β are mainly heterochromatic, whereas HP1γ is observed in both heterochromatin and euchromatin [32]. Recently, our laboratory has shown that each HP1 isoform is regulated by posttranslational modifications, such as acetylation, phosphorylation by multiple kinases, methylation, ubiquitination and sumoylation, in a similar way to histones [27]. Interestingly, modification of a specific residue, Ser83 of HP1γ, defines a subpopulation of this isoform that is exclusive to euchromatin [27]. It can therefore be extrapolated that the subnuclear localization of HP1 proteins is determined not only by their interactions with other proteins, but also by a combination of protein interactions with particular posttranslational modifications.

Repetitive DNA elements are found at centromeres and telomeres and are enriched with HP1 [34]. HP1 proteins have been localized to the nuclear periphery, and this may be associated with their interaction with the lamin B receptor and/or with the localization of centromeric heterochromatin [35, 36]. In addition to the DNA repeats present in centromeres and telomeres, repetitive DNA sequences that are spread throughout euchromatin can also be associated with heterochromatin formation. HP1 has also been shown to be a mediator of more refined silencing at single-copy genes in euchromatic regions [3739]. In Drosophila, HP1 has recently been shown to co-localize with transcriptionally active domains of polytene chromosomes and, in both mouse and human, HP1 proteins, in particular HP1γ, have been associated with transcriptional elongation [27, 40]. Thus, despite its name and its predominant localization at heterochromatin, HP1 seems to have different roles in different nuclear environments.

The most common of HP1 functions is the formation of heterochromatin. One model of heterochromatin formation involves a circular recruitment based on binding to methyl K9 histone H3. HP1 is recruited to the methylated K9 mark through the histone K9 methyltransferase SUV39H1 [16, 41]. In turn, HP1 recruits more SUV39H1, which propagates the methyl K9 mark to spread along a locus, with subsequent recruitment of additional HP1 molecules. This model has been also extended to DNA methylation, as both HP1 and SUV39H1 recruit DNA methyltransferases [42]. It is noteworthy that, in some cases, histone H3 K9 methylation precedes DNA methylation [4348], supporting the notion these molecules participate in a recruitment loop for gene silencing.

In addition to binding methylated K9 of histone H3, HP1 has been observed to interact directly or indirectly with several non-histone proteins with a wide variety of functions. These partners are involved in cellular processes ranging from transcriptional regulation, chromatin modification and replication to DNA repair, nuclear architecture and chromosomal maintenance (Table 1). Interestingly, these interactions can occur in either a manner specific to one HP1 isoform or universally with all three isoforms, and they can also depend on particular posttranslational modifications of HP1 [27]. For example, Ku70, a protein involved in repair of DNA double-strand breaks, appears to interact with HP1γ only upon phosphorylation of Ser83 of HP1γ, whereas HP1α interacts with Ku70 under native conditions [27, 49]. One mechanism of chromoshadow domain binding is through a PXVXL motif present in various other proteins, which is sufficient for interaction with dimerized chromoshadow domains [21]. Interaction occurs through binding of the peptide across the HP1 dimer interface, so that it forms a parallel β sheet with the carboxy-terminal tail of one monomer and an antiparallel β sheet with the tail of the other monomer [50]. Targeting of HP1 to heterochromatin has been shown to require this interaction with PXVXL-containing proteins in addition to the necessity of methyl K9 histone H3 recognition [50].

Table 1 Examples of HP-1 interacting partners

The chromoshadow domain is important for both the homo- and the heterodimerization properties of HP1 as well as its interaction with other molecules. HP1 molecules readily dimerize with each other through their chromoshadow domains [24, 35, 51]. There appear to be differences in preferences for dimerization between particular isoforms, although this may vary with conditions such as phosphorylation status. Dimerization between HP1 molecules has been shown to occur between the carboxy-terminal α helices of each monomer. The dimer interface involves contact with key residues Ile161, Tyr164, Leu168 of mouse HP1β or the equivalent residues in other proteins [25]. These residues are conserved in all mouse and human HP1 isoforms, as well as in Drosophila HP1.

The importance of HP1 in normal development is suggested by the phenotype of the homozygous mutation of the gene encoding HP1 in Drosophila, Su(var)2-5: lethality at the third instar larval stage [52]. This developmental stage coincides with the time that the maternal supply of HP1 proteins normally becomes reduced.

The RNA interference (RNAi) machinery has also been found to be essential for the establishment and maintenance of heterochromatin domains. Loss of or mutations in components of RNAi machinery in S. pombe, Drosophila and mouse result in abnormal localization of HP1 [5355]. In one report, production of small interfering (si)RNA is not affected in the absence of HP1 [56], (since retracted) suggesting indicating that HP1 is not involved in the initiation of RNAi but rather functions downstream of the RNAi pathway.


HP1 proteins have been a subject of active investigation for over a decade. Today, a significant amount of information is known abut the structural and the basic biochemical properties of these proteins. Many questions remain to be addressed, however. The diversity of binding partners combined with the isoform specificity of binding implicates HP1 proteins in many nuclear processes. With the high degree of similarity between the three isoforms, the factors that influence these differences remain unknown. Despite the identification of so many HP1 binding partners, the signaling cascades that mediate interaction with these proteins in order to ultimately 'switch on' or 'switch off' gene silencing also remain poorly defined. Thus, it is essential to define these pathways if we are to map useful networks of membrane-to-chromatin signaling cascades and understand better the regulation of both activation and repression. With each HP1 isoform further regulated by posttranslational modifications similar to those that make the histone code possible, we are seeing the emergence of a new paradigm that includes an HP1-mediated subcode in conjunction with the histone code. This is a significant step forward for this field of research and means that the possible combinations become endless. We anticipate that HP1 will continue to be an active field of research and that future studies in this field will be exciting and illuminating, not only for this protein family, but in the larger context of chromatin dynamics.


  1. 1.

    James TC, Elgin SC: Identification of a nonhistone chromosomal protein associated with heterochromatin in Drosophila melanogaster and its gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1986, 6: 3862-3872.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Eissenberg JC, James TC, Foster-Hartnett DM, Hartnett T, Ngan V, Elgin SC: Mutation in a heterochromatin-specific chromosomal protein is associated with suppression of position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990, 87: 9923-9927. 10.1073/pnas.87.24.9923.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Moazed D: Common themes in mechanisms of gene silencing. Mol Cell. 2001, 8: 489-498. 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00340-9.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Li Y, Kirschmann DA, Wallrath LL: Does heterochromatin protein 1 always follow code?. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 16462-16469. 10.1073/pnas.162371699.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Norwood LE, Grade SK, Cryderman DE, Hines KA, Furiasse N, Toro R, Li Y, Dhasarathy A, Kladde MP, Hendrix MJ, et al: Conserved properties of HP1(Hsalpha). Gene. 2004, 336: 37-46. 10.1016/j.gene.2004.04.003.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Waterston RH, Lindblad-Toh K, Birney E, Rogers J, Abril JF, Agarwal P, Agarwala R, Ainscough R, Alexandersson M, An P, et al: Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature. 2002, 420: 520-562. 10.1038/nature01262.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Vermaak D, Henikoff S, Malik HS: Positive selection drives the evolution of rhino, a member of the heterochromatin protein 1 family in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 2005, 1: 96-108. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010009.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jones DO, Mattei MG, Horsley D, Cowell IG, Singh PB: The gene and pseudogenes of Cbx3/mHP1 gamma. DNA Seq. 2001, 12: 147-160.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Park A, Holmer L, Worman HJ: A human HP1 pseudogene maps to chromosome 11p14. Somat Cell Mol Genet. 1998, 24: 353-356. 10.1023/A:1024490407969.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Jones DO, Cowell IG, Singh PB: Mammalian chromodomain proteins: their role in genome organisation and expression. BioEssays. 2000, 22: 124-137. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(200002)22:2<124::AID-BIES4>3.0.CO;2-E.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Paro R, Hogness DS: The Polycomb protein shares a homologous domain with a heterochromatin-associated protein of Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991, 88: 263-267. 10.1073/pnas.88.1.263.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Platero JS, Hartnett T, Eissenberg JC: Functional analysis of the chromo domain of HP1. EMBO J. 1995, 14: 3977-3986.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Aasland R, Stewart AF: The chromo shadow domain, a second chromo domain in heterochromatin-binding protein 1, HP1. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23: 3168-3173.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wang G, Ma A, Chow CM, Horsley D, Brown NR, Cowell IG, Singh PB: Conservation of heterochromatin protein 1 function. Mol Cell Biol. 2000, 20: 6970-6983. 10.1128/MCB.20.18.6970-6983.2000.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bannister AJ, Zegerman P, Partridge JF, Miska EA, Thomas JO, Allshire RC, Kouzarides T: Selective recognition of methylated lysine 9 on histone H3 by the HP1 chromo domain. Nature. 2001, 410: 120-124. 10.1038/35065138.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lachner M, O'Carroll D, Rea S, Mechtler K, Jenuwein T: Methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 creates a binding site for HP1 proteins. Nature. 2001, 410: 116-120. 10.1038/35065132.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ball LJ, Murzina NV, Broadhurst RW, Raine AR, Archer SJ, Stott FJ, Murzin AG, Singh PB, Domaille PJ, Laue ED: Structure of the chromatin binding (chromo) domain from mouse modifier protein 1. EMBO J. 1997, 16: 2473-2481. 10.1093/emboj/16.9.2473.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Jacobs SA, Taverna SD, Zhang Y, Briggs SD, Li J, Eissenberg JC, Allis CD, Khorasanizadeh S: Specificity of the HP1 chromo domain for the methylated N-terminus of histone H3. EMBO J. 2001, 20: 5232-5241. 10.1093/emboj/20.18.5232.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Nielsen PR, Nietlispach D, Mott HR, Callaghan J, Bannister A, Kouzarides T, Murzin AG, Murzina NV, Laue ED: Structure of the HP1 chromodomain bound to histone H3 methylated at lysine 9. Nature. 2002, 416: 103-107. 10.1038/nature722.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Jacobs SA, Khorasanizadeh S: Structure of HP1 chromodomain bound to a Lysine 9-methylated histone H3 tail. Science. 2002, 295: 2080-2083. 10.1126/science.1069473.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Smothers JF, Henikoff S: The HP1 chromo shadow domain binds a consensus peptide pentamer. Curr Biol. 2000, 10: 27-30. 10.1016/S0960-9822(99)00260-2.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Cao R, Wang L, Wang H, Xia L, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Jones RS, Zhang Y: Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in Polycomb-group silencing. Science. 2002, 298: 1039-1043. 10.1126/science.1076997.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Fischle W, Wang Y, Jacobs SA, Kim Y, Allis CD, Khorasanizadeh S: Molecular basis for the discrimination of repressive methyl-lysine marks in histone H3 by Polycomb and HP1 chromodomains. Genes Dev. 2003, 17: 1870-1881. 10.1101/gad.1110503.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Cowieson NP, Partridge JF, Allshire RC, McLaughlin PJ: Dimerisation of a chromo shadow domain and distinctions from the chromodomain as revealed by structural analysis. Curr Biol. 2000, 10: 517-525. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00467-X.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Brasher SV, Smith BO, Fogh RH, Nietlispach D, Thiru A, Nielsen PR, Broadhurst RW, Ball LJ, Murzina NV, Laue ED: The structure of mouse HP1 suggests a unique mode of single peptide recognition by the shadow chromo domain dimer. EMBO J. 2000, 19: 1587-1597. 10.1093/emboj/19.7.1587.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Singh PB, Georgatos SD: HP1: facts, open questions, and speculation. J Struct Biol. 2002, 140: 10-16. 10.1016/S1047-8477(02)00536-1.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Lomberk G, Bensi D, Fernandez-Zapico ME, Urrutia R: Evidence for the existence of an HP1-mediated subcode within the histone code. Nat Cell Biol. 2006, 8: 407-415. 10.1038/ncb1383.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Badugu R, Yoo Y, Singh PB, Kellum R: Mutations in the heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) hinge domain affect HP1 protein interactions and chromosomal distribution. Chromosoma. 2005, 113: 370-384. 10.1007/s00412-004-0324-2.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zhao T, Heyduk T, Eissenberg JC: Phosphorylation site mutations in heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) reduce or eliminate silencing activity. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 9512-9518. 10.1074/jbc.M010098200.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Koike N, Maita H, Taira T, Ariga H, Iguchi-Ariga SM: Identification of heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) as a phosphorylation target by Pim-1 kinase and the effect of phosphorylation on the transcriptional repression function of HP1(1). FEBS Lett. 2000, 467: 17-21. 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01105-4.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Horsley D, Hutchings A, Butcher GW, Singh PB: M32, a murine homologue of Drosophila heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1), localises to euchromatin within interphase nuclei and is largely excluded from constitutive heterochromatin. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1996, 73: 308-311.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Minc E, Courvalin JC, Buendia B: HP1gamma associates with euchromatin and heterochromatin in mammalian nuclei and chromosomes. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2000, 90: 279-284. 10.1159/000056789.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Fanti L, Berloco M, Piacentini L, Pimpinelli S: Chromosomal distribution of heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) in Drosophila: a cytological map of euchromatic HP1 binding sites. Genetica. 2003, 117: 135-147. 10.1023/A:1022971407290.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    James TC, Eissenberg JC, Craig C, Dietrich V, Hobson A, Elgin SC: Distribution patterns of HP1, a heterochromatin-associated nonhistone chromosomal protein of Drosophila. Eur J Cell Biol. 1989, 50: 170-180.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ye Q, Callebaut I, Pezhman A, Courvalin JC, Worman HJ: Domain-specific interactions of human HP1-type chromodomain proteins and inner nuclear membrane protein LBR. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 14983-14989. 10.1074/jbc.272.23.14983.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kourmouli N, Theodoropoulos PA, Dialynas G, Bakou A, Politou AS, Cowell IG, Singh PB, Georgatos SD: Dynamic associations of heterochromatin protein 1 with the nuclear envelope. EMBO J. 2000, 19: 6558-6568. 10.1093/emboj/19.23.6558.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Nielsen SJ, Schneider R, Bauer UM, Bannister AJ, Morrison A, O'Carroll D, Firestein R, Cleary M, Jenuwein T, Herrera RE, et al: Rb targets histone H3 methylation and HP1 to promoters. Nature. 2001, 412: 561-565. 10.1038/35087620.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ogawa H, Ishiguro K-i, Gaubatz S, Livingston DM, Nakatani Y: A complex with chromatin modifiers that occupies E2F- and Myc-responsive genes in G0 cells. Science. 2002, 296: 1132-1136. 10.1126/science.1069861.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Ayyanathan K, Lechner MS, Bell P, Maul GG, Schultz DC, Yamada Y, Tanaka K, Torigoe K, Rauscher FJ: Regulated recruitment of HP1 to a euchromatic gene induces mitotically heritable, epigenetic gene silencing: a mammalian cell culture model of gene variegation. Genes Dev. 2003, 17: 1855-1869. 10.1101/gad.1102803.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Vakoc CR, Mandat SA, Olenchock BA, Blobel GA: Histone H3 lysine 9 methylation and HP1gamma are associated with transcription elongation through mammalian chromatin. Mol Cell. 2005, 19: 381-391. 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.011.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Stewart MD, Li J, Wong J: Relationship between histone H3 lysine 9 methylation, transcription repression, and heterochromatin protein 1 recruitment. Mol Cell Biol. 2005, 25: 2525-2538. 10.1128/MCB.25.7.2525-2538.2005.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Fuks F, Hurd PJ, Deplus R, Kouzarides T: The DNA methyltransferases associate with HP1 and the SUV39H1 histone methyltransferase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 2305-2312. 10.1093/nar/gkg332.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Tamaru H, Selker EU: A histone H3 methyltransferase controls DNA methylation in Neurospora crassa. Nature. 2001, 414: 277-283. 10.1038/35104508.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Tamaru H, Zhang X, McMillen D, Singh PB, Nakayama J-i, Grewal SI, Allis CD, Cheng X, Selker EU: Trimethylated lysine 9 of histone H3 is a mark for DNA methylation in Neurospora crassa. Nat Genet. 2003, 34: 75-79. 10.1038/ng1143.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Jackson JP, Lindroth AM, Cao X, Jacobsen SE: Control of CpNpG DNA methylation by the KRYPTONITE histone H3 methyltransferase. Nature. 2002, 416: 556-560. 10.1038/nature731.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Lehnertz B, Ueda Y, Derijck AA, Braunschweig U, Perez-Burgos L, Kubicek S, Chen T, Li E, Jenuwein T, Peters AH: Suv39h-mediated histone H3 lysine 9 methylation directs DNA methylation to major satellite repeats at pericentric heterochromatin. Curr Biol. 2003, 13: 1192-1200. 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00432-9.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Malagnac F, Bartee L, Bender J: An Arabidopsis SET domain protein required for maintenance but not establishment of DNA methylation. EMBO J. 2002, 21: 6842-6852. 10.1093/emboj/cdf687.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Feldman N, Gerson A, Fang J, Li E, Zhang Y, Shinkai Y, Cedar H, Bergman Y: G9a-mediated irreversible epigenetic inactivation of Oct-3/4 during early embryogenesis. Nat Cell Biol. 2006, 8: 188-194. 10.1038/ncb1353.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Song K, Jung Y, Jung D, Lee I: Human Ku70 interacts with heterochromatin protein 1alpha. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 8321-8327. 10.1074/jbc.M008779200.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Thiru A, Nietlispach D, Mott HR, Okuwaki M, Lyon D, Nielsen PR, Hirshberg M, Verreault A, Murzina NV, Laue ED: Structural basis of HP1/PXVXL motif peptide interactions and HP1 localisation to heterochromatin. EMBO J. 2004, 23: 489-499. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600088.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Zhao T, Heyduk T, Allis CD, Eissenberg JC: Heterochromatin protein 1 binds to nucleosomes and DNA in vitro. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 28332-28338.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Lu BY, Emtage PC, Duyf BJ, Hilliker AJ, Eissenberg JC: Heterochromatin protein 1 is required for the normal expression of two heterochromatin genes in Drosophila. Genetics. 2000, 155: 699-708.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Volpe TA, Kidner C, Hall IM, Teng G, Grewal SI, Martienssen RA: Regulation of heterochromatic silencing and histone H3 lysine-9 methylation by RNAi. Science. 2002, 297: 1833-1837. 10.1126/science.1074973.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Pal-Bhadra M, Leibovitch BA, Gandhi SG, Rao M, Bhadra U, Birchler JA, Elgin SC: Heterochromatic silencing and HP1 localization in Drosophila are dependent on the RNAi machinery. Science. 2004, 303: 669-672. 10.1126/science.1092653.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Kanellopoulou C, Muljo SA, Kung AL, Ganesan S, Drapkin R, Jenuwein T, Livingston DM, Rajewsky K: Dicer-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells are defective in differentiation and centromeric silencing. Genes Dev. 2005, 19: 489-501. 10.1101/gad.1248505.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Schramke V, Allshire R: Hairpin RNAs and retrotransposon LTRs effect RNAi and chromatin-based gene silencing. Science. 2003, 301: 1069-1074. 10.1126/science.1086870.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Nielsen AL, Oulad-Abdelghani M, Ortiz JA, Remboutsika E, Chambon P, Losson R: Heterochromatin formation in mammalian cells: interaction between histones and HP1 proteins. Mol Cell. 2001, 7: 729-739. 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00218-0.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Polioudaki H, Kourmouli N, Drosou V, Bakou A, Theodoropoulos PA, Singh PB, Giannakouros T, Georgatos SD: Histones H3/H4 form a tight complex with the inner nuclear membrane protein LBR and heterochromatin protein 1. EMBO Rep. 2001, 2: 920-925. 10.1093/embo-reports/kve199.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Melcher M, Schmid M, Aagaard L, Selenko P, Laible G, Jenuwein T: Structure-function analysis of SUV39H1 reveals a dominant role in heterochromatin organization, chromosome segregation, and mitotic progression. Mol Cell Biol. 2000, 20: 3728-3741. 10.1128/MCB.20.10.3728-3741.2000.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Yamamoto K, Sonoda M, Inokuchi J, Shirasawa S, Sasazuki T: Polycomb group suppressor of zeste 12 links heterochromatin protein 1alpha and enhancer of zeste 2. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 401-406. 10.1074/jbc.M307344200.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Bachman KE, Rountree MR, Baylin SB: Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are transcriptional repressors that exhibit unique localization properties to heterochromatin. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 32282-32287. 10.1074/jbc.M104661200.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Ryan RF, Schultz DC, Ayyanathan K, Singh PB, Friedman JR, Fredericks WJ, Rauscher FJ: KAP-1 corepressor protein interacts and colocalizes with heterochromatic and euchromatic HP1 proteins: a potential role for Kruppel-associated box-zinc finger proteins in heterochromatin-mediated gene silencing. Mol Cell Biol. 1999, 19: 4366-4378.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Nielsen AL, Ortiz JA, You J, Oulad-Abdelghani M, Khechumian R, Gansmuller A, Chambon P, Losson R: Interaction with members of the heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) family and histone deacetylation are differentially involved in transcriptional silencing by members of the TIF1 family. EMBO J. 1999, 18: 6385-6395. 10.1093/emboj/18.22.6385.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Zhang CL, McKinsey TA, Olson EN: Association of class II histone deacetylases with heterochromatin protein 1: potential role for histone methylation in control of muscle differentiation. Mol Cell Biol. 2002, 22: 7302-7312. 10.1128/MCB.22.20.7302-7312.2002.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Nielsen AL, Sanchez C, Ichinose H, Cervino M, Lerouge T, Chambon P, Losson R: Selective interaction between the chromatin-remodeling factor BRG1 and the heterochromatin-associated protein HP1alpha. EMBO J. 2002, 21: 5797-5806. 10.1093/emboj/cdf560.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    McDowell TL, Gibbons RJ, Sutherland H, O'Rourke DM, Bickmore WA, Pombo A, Turley H, Gatter K, Picketts DJ, Buckle VJ, et al: Localization of a putative transcriptional regulator (ATRX) at pericentromeric heterochromatin and the short arms of acrocentric chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96: 13983-13988. 10.1073/pnas.96.24.13983.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Vassallo MF, Tanese N: Isoform-specific interaction of HP1 with human TAFII130. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 5919-5924. 10.1073/pnas.092025499.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Muchardt C, Guilleme M, Seeler JS, Trouche D, Dejean A, Yaniv M: Coordinated methyl and RNA binding is required for heterochromatin localization of mammalian HP1alpha. EMBO Rep. 2002, 3: 975-981. 10.1093/embo-reports/kvf194.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Murzina N, Verreault A, Laue E, Stillman B: Heterochromatin dynamics in mouse cells: interaction between chromatin assembly factor 1 and HP1 proteins. Mol Cell. 1999, 4: 529-540. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80204-X.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Pak DT, Pflumm M, Chesnokov I, Huang DW, Kellum R, Marr J, Romanowski P, Botchan MR: Association of the origin recognition complex with heterochromatin and HP1 in higher eukaryotes. Cell. 1997, 91: 311-323. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80415-8.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Nonaka N, Kitajima T, Yokobayashi S, Xiao G, Yamamoto M, Grewal SI, Watanabe Y: Recruitment of cohesin to heterochromatic regions by Swi6/HP1 in fission yeast. Nat Cell Biol. 2002, 4: 89-93. 10.1038/ncb739.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Ainsztein AM, Kandels-Lewis SE, Mackay AM, Earnshaw WC: INCENP centromere and spindle targeting: identification of essential conserved motifs and involvement of heterochromatin protein HP1. J Cell Biol. 1998, 143: 1763-1774. 10.1083/jcb.143.7.1763.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Bailis JM, Bernard P, Antonelli R, Allshire RC, Forsburg SL: Hsk1-Dfp1 is required for heterochromatin-mediated cohesion at centromeres. Nat Cell Biol. 2003, 5: 1111-1116. 10.1038/ncb1069.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Scholzen T, Endl E, Wohlenberg C, van der Sar S, Cowell IG, Gerdes J, Singh PB: The Ki-67 protein interacts with members of the heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) family: a potential role in the regulation of higher-order chromatin structure. J Pathol. 2002, 196: 135-144. 10.1002/path.1016.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Seeler JS, Marchio A, Sitterlin D, Transy C, Dejean A: Interaction of SP100 with HP1 proteins: a link between the promyelocytic leukemia-associated nuclear bodies and the chromatin compartment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95: 7316-7321. 10.1073/pnas.95.13.7316.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute: Pfam. []

  77. 77.

    SMART. []

  78. 78.

    Accelrys: Insight II. []

Download references


This work was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health (grants DK52913 and DK56620) and the Mayo Kogod Center for Aging Research to R.U. and the National Institutes of Health (grant GM61513) to LW. G.L. was supported by the Mayo Clinic National Institutes of Health training grant in Digestive Diseases.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raul Urrutia.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lomberk, G., Wallrath, L. & Urrutia, R. The Heterochromatin Protein 1 family. Genome Biol 7, 228 (2006).

Download citation


  • Dime Interface
  • Globular Conformation
  • Euchromatic Gene
  • Dominant Suppressor
  • Methyl Lysine