Skip to main content

The genome of Rhizobium leguminosarum has recognizable core and accessory components



Rhizobium leguminosarum is an α-proteobacterial N2-fixing symbiont of legumes that has been the subject of more than a thousand publications. Genes for the symbiotic interaction with plants are well studied, but the adaptations that allow survival and growth in the soil environment are poorly understood. We have sequenced the genome of R. leguminosarum biovar viciae strain 3841.


The 7.75 Mb genome comprises a circular chromosome and six circular plasmids, with 61% G+C overall. All three rRNA operons and 52 tRNA genes are on the chromosome; essential protein-encoding genes are largely chromosomal, but most functional classes occur on plasmids as well. Of the 7,263 protein-encoding genes, 2,056 had orthologs in each of three related genomes (Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Sinorhizobium meliloti, and Mesorhizobium loti), and these genes were over-represented in the chromosome and had above average G+C. Most supported the rRNA-based phylogeny, confirming A. tumefaciens to be the closest among these relatives, but 347 genes were incompatible with this phylogeny; these were scattered throughout the genome but were over-represented on the plasmids. An unexpectedly large number of genes were shared by all three rhizobia but were missing from A. tumefaciens.


Overall, the genome can be considered to have two main components: a 'core', which is higher in G+C, is mostly chromosomal, is shared with related organisms, and has a consistent phylogeny; and an 'accessory' component, which is sporadic in distribution, lower in G+C, and located on the plasmids and chromosomal islands. The accessory genome has a different nucleotide composition from the core despite a long history of coexistence.


The symbiosis between legumes and N2-fixing bacteria (rhizobia) is of huge agronomic benefit, allowing many crops to be grown without N fertilizer. It is a sophisticated example of coupled development between bacteria and higher plants, culminating in the organogenesis of root nodules [1]. There have been many genetic analyses of rhizobia, notably of Sinorhizobium meliloti (the symbiont of alfalfa), Bradyrhizobium japonicum (soybean), and Rhizobium leguminosarum, which has biovars that nodulate peas and broad beans (biovar viciae), clovers (biovar trifolii), or kidney beans (biovar phaseoli).

The Rhizobiales, an α-proteobacterial order that also includes mammalian pathogens Bartonella and Brucella and phytopathogenic Agrobacterium, have diverse genomic architectures. The single chromosome of Bartonella is small (1.6-1.9 Mb [2]), but the larger (approximately 3.3 Mb) Brucella genomes comprise two circles [35]. Genomes of the plant-associated bacteria are larger still; that of A. tumefaciens is about 5.6 Mb, with one circular and one linear chromosome, plus two native plasmids [6, 7]. To date, three rhizobial genomes have been sequenced. S. meliloti 1021 has a 3.5 Mb chromosome plus two megaplasmids, namely pSymA (1.35 Mb) and pSymB (1.68 Mb), with the former having genes for nodulation (nod) and symbiotic N2 fixation (nif and fix) [8]. In contrast, the symbiosis genes of Mesorhizobium loti MAFF303099 (which nodulates Lotus) and of B. japonicum USDA110 are on chromosomal 'symbiosis islands', with the chromosome of the latter (9.1 Mb) being among the largest yet known in bacteria [9, 10].

Rhizobium leguminosarum has yet another genomic architecture: one circular chromosome and several large plasmids, the plasmid portfolio varying markedly among isolates in terms of sizes, numbers, and incompatibility groups [1114]. The subject of the present study, R. leguminosarum biovar viciae (Rlv) strain 3841 (a spontaneous streptomycin-resistant mutant of field isolate 300 [15, 16]), has six large plasmids; pRL10 is the pSym (symbiosis plasmid) and pRL7 and pRL8 are transferable by conjugation [17].

The distinction between 'chromosome' and 'plasmid' has become blurred in recent years with the discovery that many bacteria have more than one replicon with over a million base pairs. For example, the second replicon of Brucella melitensis 16M is called a chromosome (1.18 Mb) [3], whereas the equivalent in S. meliloti 1021 is referred to as a megaplasmid (pSymB; 1.68 Mb) [8]. They both replicate using the repABC system as is typical of plasmids, and both carry the only copies of certain essential genes, although the B. melitensis chromosome II has many more of these as well as a complete ribosomal RNA operon. What combination of size, replication system, rRNA genes, and essentiality should qualify a replicon to be called a chromosome is probably more a matter of semantics than of biology.

A more important distinction, in our view, is between 'core' and 'accessory' genomes. This distinction predates the genomics era; indeed, it has been discussed for more than a quarter of a century. Davey and Reanney [18] contrasted 'universal' and 'peripheral' genes, or 'conserved' and 'experimental' DNA. Campbell [19] wrote of 'euchromosomal' and 'accessory' DNA and explained how gene transfer was important in shaping the latter. He pointed out that genes carried by plasmids or transposons were 'available to all cells of the species, though not actually present in them' and 'should typically be genes that are needed occasionally rather than continually under natural conditions'. Furthermore, the need to function in different genetic backgrounds meant that 'evolution must limit the development of specific interactions between their products and those of universal genes'. This would tend to sharpen the separation between the euchromosomal and accessory gene pools, although transfer between them would remain possible.

The expectation is that particular accessory genes will often be absent from closely related strains or species, and as comparative data became available such genes were indeed found in large numbers [20]. They often had a nucleotide composition different from the bulk of the genome, and this property had previously been interpreted as evidence that they were 'foreign' genes [21]. This is plausible because nucleotide composition can be quite different between distantly related bacteria even though it is relatively consistent within genomes [22]. This pattern is thought to reflect biased mutation rates that tend to create a distinctive composition for each genome [23], and if these 'foreign' genes remained long enough they would gradually ameliorate toward the local composition [20]. Unusual composition is not an infallible indicator of recent acquisition [24], although there is a strong tendency for genes acquired by Escherichia coli to be A+T rich [25]. Amelioration will be expected if genes of unusual composition are normal genes that reflect the composition of some distant donor species [20], but an alternative explanation is that they represent a class of genes that maintain a distinct composition. Daubin and coworkers [26] pointed out that phage and insertion sequences are generally A+T rich, and suggested that many of the apparently 'foreign' genes may actually be 'morons', which are genes of unknown function that are carried by phages. Phages generally have a fairly limited host range, which would imply that these genes are mostly shuttling between related strains. This brings us back to Campbell's notion of accessory DNA [19]. Lan and Reeves [27] expressed much the same idea when they described the 'species genome' as a combination of 'core' and 'auxiliary' genes. We use the terms 'core' and 'accessory'.

We sequenced Rlv3841 to expose the architecture of its complex genome, and to see whether the seven replicons were specialized in their traits. In presenting our findings, we stress general trends more than individual genes, and explore the concept that the genome comprises 'core' and 'accessory' components.


Genome organization

Rlv3841 has a genome of 7,751,309 base pairs, of which 65% is in a circular chromosome and the rest are in six circular plasmids (Table 1 and Figure 1). This is consistent with earlier electrophoretic and genetic data on this strain [28]. All three rRNA operons, which are identical, and all 52 tRNA genes are chromosomal. This is in contrast to A. tumefaciens, S. meliloti and Brucella spp., in which some of these genes are on a second large replicon (> 1 Mb) termed a 'megaplasmid' or 'second chromosome' [3, 68]. The chromosome of Rlv3841 (5.06 Mb) is much larger than those of A. tumefaciens (2.84 Mb), S. meliloti (3.65 Mb) and B. melitensis (2.12 Mb), and the total plasmid content (2.69 Mb) is also large.

Table 1 Genome statistics for Rlv3841
Figure 1
figure 1

The chromosome and six plasmids of Rlv3841. The plasmids are shown at the same relative scale, and the chromosome at one-fourth of that scale. Circles from outermost to innermost indicate genes in forward and reverse orientation: all genes, membrane proteins (bright green), conserved and unconserved hypotheticals (brown conserved, pale green unconserved), phage and transposons (pink, shown for pRL7 only), and (for the chromosome only) DNA transcription/restriction/helicases (red) and transcriptional regulators (blue). Inner circles indicate deviations in G+C content (black) and G-C skew (olive/maroon). The full list of Sanger Institute standard colors for functional categories is as follows: white = pathogenicity/adaptation/chaperones (shown here in black); dark grey = energy metabolism (glycolysis, electron transport, among others); red = information transfer (transcription/translation + DNA/RNA modification); bright green = surface (inner membrane, outer membrane, secreted, surface structures [lipopolysaccharide, among others]); and dark blue = stable RNA; turquoise = degradation of large molecules; pink/purple = degradation of small molecules; yellow = central/intermediary/miscellaneous metabolism; pale green = unknown; pale blue = regulators; orange/brown = conserved hypo; dark brown = pseudogenes and partial genes (remnants); light pink = phage/insertion sequence elements; light grey = some miscellaneous information (for example, Prosite) but no function. bp, base pairs; Rlv3841, R. leguminosarum biovar viciae strain 3841.

Plasmid replication genes

All six plasmids of Rlv3841 have putative replication systems based on repABC genes, which is the commonest system in (and apparently confined to) α-proteobacteria. RepA and RepB are thought to be a partitioning system that is essential for plasmid stability, whereas RepC is needed for plasmid replication [29, 30]. Rlv3841 has the largest number of mutually compatible repABC plasmids yet found in one strain of any bacterial species. Although clearly homologous, each of the RepA and RepB polypeptides is highly diverged from all of the others, presumably allowing coexistence of all six plasmids (amino acid identities range from 41% to 61% for RepA, and from 30% to 43% for RepB). Most RepC sequences are also diverged (55% to 68% identity) but the pRL9 and pRL12 RepCs are 97.6% identical, suggesting that a recent recombination has taken place and that divergence of RepC is not critical for plasmid compatibility. Plasmid pRL7 has an 'extra' repABC operon (genes pRL70092-4) and a third version lacking repB (pRL70038-9).

The distribution of different functional classes of genes

The chromosome and all plasmids except one (pRL7) are remarkably similar in their mix of functional classes (Figure 2). Core functions (to the left in Figure 2) are most abundant on the chromosome, but they are also strongly represented on the plasmids. The proportion of novel and uncharacterized genes ('no known homologues' or 'conserved hypothetical') is as high on the chromosome (31.5%) as it is on the plasmids (30%).

Figure 2
figure 2

Distribution of functional classes of genes within replicons. The classes are based on those presented by Riley [86].

Most putatively essential genes (for example, those that encode core transcription machinery, ribosome biosynthesis, chaperones, and cell division) are chromosomal, but there are exceptions. The only copies of minCDE, which - although not absolutely essential for viability - are involved in septum formation and required for proper cell division [31], are on pRL11 (pRL110546-8). In A. tumefaciens, S. meliloti, and B. melitensis, minCDE are on the linear replicon, pSymB and chromosome II, respectively, raising the possibility that minCDE are important for segregation of large replicons other than the main chromosome. Other 'essential' genes on plasmids include major heat-shock chaperone genes cpn10/cpn60 (groES/groEL) on pRL12 (pRL120643/pRL120642), cpn60 on pRL9 (pRL90041), and ribosomal protein S21 on pRL10 (pRL100450). However, these genes have chromosomal paralogs, so the different copies may serve specialist functions [32] or be functionally redundant [33].

pRL7 is very different from the rest of the genome, with more than 80% of its genes being apparently foreign and/or of unknown function (Figure 2). In fact, 53 genes (28%) encode putative transposases or related proteins, and 31 (including some transposases) are pseudogenes. This plasmid appears to have accumulated multiple mobile elements, often overlapping each other. For example, gene pRL70047A (an intron maturase) is interrupted by pRL70047, which encodes a homolog of the putative transposase of the Sinorhizobium fredii repetitive sequence RFRS9 [34] and pRL70047D (conserved hypothetical), and the latter is in turn interrupted by an IS element (pRL70047A, B, C).

Nucleotide composition

The overall G+C content in Rlv3841 is 61% (Table 1), which is closer to that of S. meliloti (62%) than to that of A. tumefaciens (58%). Plasmids pRL10, pRL7, and pRL8 have G+C content under 60%, but the other plasmids resemble the chromosome (61%). However, these averages conceal much local variation, and a plot of GC3s (G+C content of synonymous third positions) reveals many chromosomal 'islands', in which most genes have below average GC3s (Figures 3 and 4). Several of the most distinct islands, for instance RL0790-RL0841 (54 kilobases [kb]), RL2105-RL2200 (105 kb), RL3627-3670 (52 kb) and RL3941-RL3956 (12 kb), precisely abut a tRNA gene; this suggests that they may be mobile elements that target tRNA genes, as has been described for the symbiosis island of M. loti [10] and many genomic and pathogenicity islands in other bacteria.

Figure 3
figure 3

Protein-encoding genes on the chromosome and six plasmids of Rlv3841, showing their nucleotide composition. GC3s (G+C content of silent third positions of codons) is a sensitive measure of composition. Symbols indicate whether each gene encodes a quartop protein (with orthologs in A. tumefaciens, S. meliloti, and M. loti) and, if so, which phylogenetic topology it supports (RA-SM denotes the tree that pairs R. leguminosarum with A. tumefaciens, and S. meliloti with M. loti; RM-AS and RS-AM are similarly defined). In addition, the nodulation genes nodOTNMLEFDABCIJ are identified on pRL10. Rlv3841, R. leguminosarum biovar viciae strain 3841.

Figure 4
figure 4

Detail of part of Figure 3, showing a chromosomal island. The island extends from 855 to 908 kilobases, genes RL0790-RL0841, and is recognizable by low GC3s (G+C content of silent third positions of codons) and absence of quartop genes. RA-SM denotes the tree that pairs R. leguminosarum with A. tumefaciens, and S. meliloti with M. loti; RM-AS and RS-AM are similarly defined.

Dinucleotide relative abundance (DRA) is usually thought to be relatively homogeneous within a bacterial species but different between genomes, even of close relatives [35]. The closest sequenced relative of Rlv3841 is A. tumefaciens C58, but the DRAs of these two genomes are consistently different, with no overlap (Figure 5). The C58 linear replicon and large parts of Rlv plasmids pRL12, pRL11, pRL10, and pRL9 have very similar compositions to their respective chromosomes, implying that they have been confined to a narrow range of hosts long enough to acquire the distinctive DRA characteristic of their host. In contrast, the DRAs of pAT, pTi, pRL7 and pRL8, as well as parts of pRL10 and pRL11, resemble each other but are very distinct from those of the corresponding chromosomes (Figure 5). Plasmids pRL7 and pRL8 are transferable by conjugation [7, 17], and so they may be part of a pool of mobile replicons that have not equilibrated to the DRA of their current host genomes. Some regions of the chromosomes and larger plasmids also have this distinctive DRA, perhaps reflecting the recent insertion of 'islands' of mobile DNA. Inclusion of two more genomes, namely those of S. meliloti and M. loti, in a similar analysis does not change the overall picture (KHH and JPWY, unpublished data); the core DNA forms genome-specific clusters whereas the accessory DNA of all four genomes has similar DRA.

Figure 5
figure 5

Dinucleotide compositional analysis of 100-kilobase windows of the genomes of Rlv3841 and A. tumefaciens C58. On the first two axes of a principal components analysis of the symmetrized dinucleotide relative abundance (DRA) of both genomes analyzed jointly, sequences from each chromosome (chr) and plasmid are identified by distinct symbols. PC1 accounts for 48.9% and PC2 for 35.6% of the total variance. Rlv3841, R. leguminosarum biovar viciae strain 3841.

A nonrandomly distributed motif

The 8-base motif GGGCAGGG is much more frequent in α-proteobacterial chromosomes than expected [36]. Its orientation is biased to the leading replication strand and it is most frequent near the terminus of replication, although the reasons for this have not yet been elucidated. Its distribution on the Rlv3841 chromosome clearly illustrates this pattern (Figure 6). Of the 357 copies of the motif, 346 are oriented from origin to terminus (taking about 5,000,000 and about 2,592,000 as the presumed origin and terminus, respectively). The motif is more abundant near the terminus (approximately one every 7 kb) than near the origin (every 25 kb). A novel observation is that it also occurs on plasmids, with a similar frequency and strand bias (Figure 6). However, there is one anomaly; the motif pattern on pRL12 predicts an origin at about 400,000 rather than near repABC. This suggests either that replication initiation of pRL12 is not near repABC or that pRL12 has recently been rearranged but can survive and replicate with the 'wrong' motif distribution.

Figure 6
figure 6

Cumulative distribution of the eight-base motif GGGCAGGG in the genome of Rlv3841. The motif is shown in forward and reverse orientation on chromosome and plasmids. Rlv3841, R. leguminosarum biovar viciae strain 3841.

Core genes and their phylogeny

We identified 648 Rlv3841 genes, 97% of them chromosomal, that have orthologs in each of six other fully sequenced α-proteobacterial genomes (identified in Figure 7). Overall, a phylogeny based on all of these 648 proteins (Figure 7) is consistent with the species relationships inferred from 16S ribosomal RNA, in which the closest relative of R. leguminosarum is A. tumefaciens, followed by S. meliloti, and then M. loti. However, many individual proteins actually support different phylogenetic relationships. To study this phylogenetic discordance in more detail we focused on four genomes, namely Rlv3841, A. tumefaciens, S. meliloti, and M. loti, which simplifies the analysis because there are just three possible topologies for an unrooted phylogeny of four organisms. We identified 2056 quartops (quartets of orthologous proteins [37]) in these four genomes (the 648 proteins above are, of course, a subset of these). The consensus topology that is implied by Figure 7 was indeed the best supported: 551 quartops supported A. tumefaciens as the closest relative of Rlv3841 (with > 99% posterior probability). However, 222 supported S. meliloti and 125 M. loti as the closest relative of Rlv3841 (Table 2). The remaining quartops have insufficient phylogenetic signal to support any topology with probability above 99%.

Figure 7
figure 7

Phylogeny of completely sequenced genomes of selected α-proteobacteria. The phylogeny is based on the concatenated sequences of 648 orthologous proteins. Neighbor-Joining method with % bootstrap support indicated. Scale indicates substitutions per site.

Table 2 Phylogenies supported by quartets of orthologous proteins shared between Rlv3841, A. tumefaciens, S. meliloti, and M. loti

Overall, the quartops represent only 27% of the 7,263 protein-encoding genes of Rlv3841. Although 38% of chromosomal genes encode quartop proteins, only 10% of plasmid genes do so. Even among chromosomal quartops, only 66% (488/745) of those with strong phylogenetic signal support the consensus phylogeny. Replacement of the original ortholog by horizontal gene transfer may explain why so many genes, especially on plasmids, support nonconventional phylogenies. Such discordant phylogenies must have arisen from many individual events, not just a few transfers of large regions, because the genes are scattered across the genome (Figure 3).

There is a strong relationship between phylogenetic distribution and the nucleotide composition of genes. Genes in the quartops have GC3s (mean ± standard error) of 77.9 ± 0.2%, irrespective of the phylogeny that they support, but the GC3s of nonquartop genes is only 72.6 ± 0.1%.

For a broader view of gene relationships, we recorded the presence or absence of a close homolog of each Rlv3841 gene in each of the three related genomes (Table 3). There are 2,253 genes that occur in all three, 2,272 that are absent from all, and 2,740 that occur in some but not all of the other genomes (identified in Additional data file 1). The largest category in this last class comprises 546 genes that are shared by all three rhizobia but are missing from A. tumefaciens, which is surprising in light of the core phylogeny. Furthermore, 264 of these genes have close homologs in Bradyrhizobium japonicum, which shares the phenotype of root nodule symbiosis with the other rhizobia but is much more distantly related according to its core genes (Figure 7). This set of 264 genes includes, of course, the known symbiosis-related genes (discussed below under Nitrogen fixation), but we hypothesized that many of the others might have unrecognized roles in symbiosis. However, after excluding the known symbiosis genes, the representation of the Riley functional classes was not significantly different among these genes from that in the genome as a whole, and so there is no obvious evidence that they are enriched in genes that encode a particular kind of function. The Riley classes provide only a broad outline of course, especially for genomes with many genes of unknown function. However, if a significant difference existed it could readily be detected, as illustrated in the case of pRL7 (Figure 3). As more genome sequences become available there will be scope for more comprehensive analyses, which might include other measures such as the distribution of protein domain classes [38]. There is no evidence to suggest that any of these genes shared by rhizobia is directly regulated by NodD, because none of them has a nod box regulatory sequence. Apart from the four known nod boxes that regulate nodA, nodF, nodM, and nodO, the only putative nod boxes that we found in the genome were upstream of RL4088 and pRL120452, both of which encode putative transmembrane proteins of unknown function, but neither of which are in the rhizobium-specific gene set.

Table 3 Numbers of genes unique to Rlv3841 or shared with one or more related genomes

RNA polymerase σ factors

To illustrate the differences between core and accessory genomes, we examined one group of genes that includes both core and accessory members, namely those that specify RNA polymerase σ factors. Rhizobia have many genes for RNA polymerase σ factors, and Rlv3841 is predicted to have 11 on the chromosome, one on pRL10, and two each on pRL11 and pRL12 (Table 4). In addition to the 'housekeeping' RpoD, there are two RpoH (heat shock), one RpoN (which is involved, among other things, in assimilation of certain N sources), plus other σ factors of the ECF (extracytoplasmic factor) subclass [39], only some of whose targets are known.

Table 4 The σ factors of Rlv3841

The chromosomal rpoD, rpoN, and rpoH genes exemplify the core genome, their products being highly conserved in close relatives (Table 5). Only one other σ factor gene (RL3703, rpoZ), which is of unknown function [40], had this pattern. In contrast, other Rlv3841 σ factor genes only occur in some of its close relatives or in none at all. One such 'Rlv-only' gene is rpoI (pRL120319), which encodes an ECF σ factor for promoters of the adjacent vbs genes, which are involved in siderophore synthesis and which are also missing from the other related genomes [41]. Thus both rpoI and its vbs 'targets' are part of the Rlv accessory genome. The GC3s of the σ factor genes generally concurs with their proposed core or accessory status. Thus, rpoD, rpoN, rpoZ, and the two rpoH all have GC3s above 77%. In contrast, pRL120319 has only 64% GC3s and pRL120580 is even lower (59%). One striking exception is pRL110418, whose product (of unknown function) is absent from close relatives of Rlv but resembles σ factors in B. japonicum and in actinomycetes. It has higher GC3s (79%) than is typical for the Rlv accessory genome, although lower than that of the related genes in Bradyrhizobium (84%) or the actinomycetes (84-94%). It is possible that this is a genuinely 'foreign' gene with a composition that still reflects its origin, rather than a long-term component of the accessory genome.

Table 5 Classification of ABC transporters of Rlv3841 compared to those of S. meliloti 1021

ABC transporter systems

Rhizobia are known to be rich in ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, and there are 183 complete ABC operons in Rlv3841 (Table 5). The corresponding genes are widely distributed in the genome but they are particularly abundant on pRL12, pRL10, and especially pRL9 (Table 6 and Figure 8). In fact, they make up 27% of all genes on pRL9. Complete uptake systems contain genes for a solute binding protein, at least one integral membrane protein, and at least one ABC protein, whereas export systems do not have solute binding proteins. The total number of ABC domains is greater than the number of genes shown in Table 5 because many genes contain two fused ABC domains. For example, of the 269 ABC genes in Rlv3841, 53 are fusions yielding 322 ABC domains. There are also 19 examples of ABC domains fused to membrane protein domains. Apart from the complete operons, there are many orphan genes and gene pairs for ABC transport systems. Altogether, we have identified 816 genes that encode putative components of ABC transporters, which represent 11% of the total protein complement (see Additional data file 1 for a full list).

Figure 8
figure 8

Genes on the chromosome and six plasmids of Rlv3841 encoding components of ABC transporter systems. The nucleotide composition (GC3s, i.e. G+C content of silent third positions of codons) of the components is shown. Members of the most abundant families are indicated, defined according to Saier [93]. ABC, ATP-binding cassette; Rlv3841, R. leguminosarum biovar viciae strain 3841.

Table 6 Distribution and phylogeny of ABC transporter genes

Only 23% of the ABC transporter genes belong to quartops (Table 6), as compared with the genome average of 38%. There are remarkable differences between the replicons in this respect; more than one-third of the transporter genes on the chromosome and pRL11 are in quartops, whereas the proportion is much lower on the other plasmids, down to a mere 7% on pRL12 (Table 6).

Given their below average representation in quartops, it is paradoxical that the transporter genes have a high average GC3s of 79.1% (genome average 74.3%). As with other genes, those in quartops have higher mean GC3s (81.1%) than those that are not (78.6%). All the genes within a particular ABC transporter operon generally have fairly similar GC3s and, with a few exceptions, the operons are in high-GC3s regions of the genome and conspicuously absent from low-GC3s islands (Figure 8).

General metabolic pathways

R. leguminosarum is considered to be an obligate aerobe, and most of the genes in central metabolism are consistent with this. For example, the genome of Rlv3841 contains all of the genes for a functional TCA cycle on the chromosome (see Additional data file 3). There are actually three candidate genes for citrate synthase (RL2508, RL2509, and RL2234) on the chromosome of Rlv3841. R. tropici has two citrate synthase genes, one of which, namely pcsA, is present on its pSym and affects nodulating ability and Fe uptake [42]. The genome of Rlv3841 contains genes for isocitrate lyase (RL0761) and malate synthase (RL0054), which would allow a gloxylate cycle to operate, although strain 3841 does not grow on acetate. There are six genes whose products closely resemble succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenases (pRL100134, pRL100252, pRL120044, pRL120603, pRL120628, and RL0101), which could feed succinate semialdehyde directly into the TCA cycle. Two of these (pRL100134 and pRL100252) are on the symbiosis plasmid, and RL0101 is the characterized gabD gene [43]. Succinate semialdehyde is the keto acid released from 4-aminobutyric acid, an amino acid that is present at high levels in pea nodules and is a possible candidate for amino acid cycling in bacteroids. The importance of this is that amino acid cycling has been proposed to be essential for productive N2 fixation in pea nodules [44].

Most free-living rhizobia are believed to use the Entner-Doudoroff or pentose phosphate pathways to catabolize sugars, and to lack the Emden-Meyerhof pathway [45, 46]. This is related to the absence of phosphofructokinase enzyme activity, and there appears to be no gene for this enzyme in Rlv3841. This gene has not been found in S. meliloti either, but it is present in B. japonicum (bll2850) and M. loti (mll5025). It has been suggested that the Emden-Meyerhof pathway does operate in B. japonicum [47], suggesting a fundamental difference in sugar catabolism between 'slow growing' Bradyrhizobium and 'fast growing' Rhizobium and Sinorhizobium. Rlv3841 has a chromosomal operon for the three genes of the Entner-Doudoroff pathway (RL0751-RL0753). In addition, there are good chromosomal candidates in gnd (RL2807) and gntZ (RL3998) for 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase, which is needed for the oxidative branch of the pentose phosphate pathway.

Nitrogen fixation

The 13 nod genes that are known to be involved in nodulation of the host plant are tightly clustered on pRL10 (pRL100175, 0178-0189). Nearby are the rhiABCR genes (pRL100169-0172) that also influence nodulation [48]. These nodulation genes are surrounded by genes needed for nitrogen fixation: nifHDKEN (pRL100162-0158), nifAB (0196-0195), fixABCX (0200-0197), and fixNOQPGHIS (0205-0210A). The latter cluster has GC3s values (66-76%) that approach the genome mean (73.4%), whereas all of the other symbiosis-related genes mentioned above have strikingly low GC3s (51-66%). There is a homolog of nodT (pRL100291) of unknown function that is also on pRL10 but is more than 100 kb away and has much higher GC3s (72.5%).

Perhaps surprisingly, there is no nifS gene whose product is a cysteine desulphurase, which is believed to be involved in making the FeS clusters of nitrogenase in other diazotrophs such as Klebsiella, Azotobacter, and Rhodobacter spp. In these genera, nifS is closely linked to other nif genes, and this is also true for nifS in B. japonicum (blr 1756) and M. loti (Mll5865). It is not clear how the FeS clusters are made for the nitrogenases of R. leguminosarum and S. meliloti (which also lacks nifS). Most bacteria possess SufS, a cysteine desulphurase that is normally is involved in making the 'housekeeping' levels of FeS clusters. Interestingly, the R. leguminosarum suf operon has two copies of sufS (RL2583 and RL2578), and so these may also supply FeS for the nitrogenase protein. Alternatively, the function of NifS may be accomplished by a protein with a wholly different sequence whose identity has not yet been recognized.

Rhizobium leguminosarum strain VF39 has two versions of the fixNOQP genes, which encode the symbiotically essential cbb3 high affinity terminal oxidase [49]. Both copies are active and both copies must be mutated to give a clear effect on symbiosis [50]. Likewise, Rlv3841 has one fixNOQP set on pRL10 (pRL100205-0207) and another copy on pRL9 (pRL90016-0018). As in strain VF39, genes for fixK (pRL90019) and fixL (pRL90020) are upstream of fixNOQP on pRL9. The complexity of regulation mediated by the predicted oxygen-responsive FixK-like regulators [49] is indicated by the fact that R. leguminosarum has no fewer than five fixK homologs, three of which (pRL90019, pRL90025, and pRL90012) are on plasmid pRL9. The global regulator of fix genes in R. leguminosarum is FnrN, and this is encoded in single copy on the chromosome (RL2818), although another strain of this species, namely UPM791, has two copies [51]. The fix genes on pRL9 are closely linked to other genes that are involved in respiration, (for example azuP, pRL90021).

Strain 3841 as a representative of the species Rhizobium leguminosarum

Strains within a bacterial species can differ by the presence or absence of large numbers of genes [5254]. To date, Rlv3841 is the only sequenced strain of R. leguminosarum, but genetic studies of other strains have identified genes that are absent in Rlv3841, for example the pSym-borne hup genes for the uptake dehydrogenase system, which has been studied in some detail in another R. leguminosarum strain [55, 56].

Rlv3841 has six plasmids, but other natural R. leguminosarum strains have from two to six plasmids of various sizes [11, 12]. The pSym of Rlv3841 is pRL10 (488 kb), in the repC3 group [14], but other pSyms differ in size and replication groups [57]. Detailed genetic analysis of symbiosis in R. leguminosarum biovar viciae has focused on pRL1, a 200 kb repC4 plasmid [57]. The nod and nif genes of pRL1 (nucleotide accession Y00548) and pRL10 differ in just 23 nucleotides over 12 kb, which is far less than occurs between such genes of other strains of this species [58, 59]. Thus, by chance, the symbiotic regions of pRL1 and pRL10 are very similar, although the plasmids are different, implying recent transfer of symbiosis genes between distantly related plasmids.

Distinctive characteristics of each replicon

In what follows, we very briefly point out some of the salient features of each of the seven replicons.

On the chromosome, most genes have high GC3s content (Figure 3), and the DRA is fairly uniform when averaged over 100 kb windows (Figure 5). Nevertheless, the chromosome is studded with islands of genes that appear to be accessory by two criteria: their GC3s is lower and they are not in quartops (Figure 4).

pRL12, the largest plasmid, has a nucleotide composition like that of the chromosome (Figures 2 and 4) but only 9% of its genes are in quartops (Table 2), and these put Rlv3841 closer to S. meliloti than to the more closely related A. tumefaciens (Figure 7). The 23 genes supporting the S. meliloti relationship are in several small clusters, the largest of which (pRL120605-pRL120613; 10.7 kb) comprises an ABC transporter operon and some flanking genes that are in the same arrangement, with more than 80% amino acid identity, on pSymA of S. meliloti.

pRL11 is the most chromosome-like plasmid, although both the proportion of quartops and their support for the consensus phylogeny are much lower than the chromosomal values. This plasmid carries the cell division genes minCDE.

pRL10 has two parts which differ in composition (Figure 3). The first part of the sequence (about the first 200 genes) includes the symbiosis genes and has archetypal characteristics of the accessory genome: low GC3s and very few quartops (the known nod and nif symbiosis genes are not among the quartops, being absent from A. tumefaciens). The rest of pRL10 resembles the larger plasmids in being mostly high-GC3s with occasional low-GC3s islands.

pRL9 has low GC3s, with two high-GC3s regions, and few quartops. More than a quarter of the genes encode ABC transporters.

pRL8 is uniformly 'accessory', with low GC3s and no quartops.

pRL7 is an assemblage of mobile elements, dominated by repeated sequences, including many derived from phages and transposable elements. It has many pseudogenes and a short average gene length (Table 1). It has two complete, unrelated sets of replication genes and parts of a third.


Why is the genome so large?

Rlv3841 has more genes than budding yeast [60] and more 'chromosomes' than fission yeast [61]. Like Rlv, many bacteria with large genomes are soil dwellers (for example, Streptomyces, Bradyrhizobium, Mesorhizobium, Ralstonia, Burkholderia, and Pseudomonas spp.). Soil is a heterogeneous environment with patchy distribution of many different substrates and potential hazards, and so a genome that encoded multiple capabilities 'just in case' would have a long-term selective advantage. The large number of transporters and regulators is consistent with this idea; a wide range of substrates can be taken up, but the pathways should be tightly regulated or the metabolic burden would be excessive. This versatility is unnecessary for rhizobia in the predictable environment of the legume nodule, but these bacteria must survive in the soil for years between these symbiotic opportunities, and their panoply of uptake systems suggests that they are often metabolically active during this phase. However, omnivory is not the only possible strategy for survival in soil; Nitrosomonas, for example, is a specialist in NH3 oxidation and has a genome of just 2.8 Mb [62].

Is there a core genome and an accessory genome?

Our concept of the accessory genome is of a pool of genes that have a long-term association with a bacterial species or group of species but are adapted to a nomadic life. An accessory gene moves readily between strains but will be found in only a subset of strains at any one time. Each bacterial genome we look at has many genes that are not seen elsewhere ('ORFans' [63]) or that have a sporadic distribution in other known genomes. These are often interpreted as newly acquired genes, particularly if their composition is not typical of the genome, but we suggest that many may in fact have a long-term association with the species but a patchy distribution across strains. There is a parallel between this concept and the view of phages as the source of a pool of potentially adaptive genes [26], because each phage generally has a limited host range. In this section we interpret the Rlv3841 genome in the light of these ideas.

Our survey of the genes of Rlv3841 considered their location, function, composition, and phylogeny. The genome is heterogeneous in all four respects, but patterns emerge when they are considered jointly. The archetypal 'core' genes are on the chromosome, have an essential function in cell maintenance, have a high G+C content, and have orthologs in related species that conform in their relationships with the species phylogeny deduced from rRNA sequences. All of these properties are positively correlated, and some genes exhibit all of them. However, these are surprisingly few (1,541), accounting for less than one-third of the genes on the chromosome.

At the other end of the spectrum are archetypal 'accessory' genes that are located on plasmids, that confer sporadically useful adaptations, that are lower in G+C, and that are missing from some related genomes or, if present, exhibit phylogenetic evidence for horizontal transfer. The nod genes illustrate all of these points, but there are hundreds of other genes with similar properties, their annotated functions varying from fairly specific (sugar transporter, response regulator) to 'conserved hypothetical' or 'no significant database hits'. We know the exact functions of most nod genes [1], but this reflects many years of study without which the nod region would have been just one more tract of vaguely annotated genes. Indeed, some of the genes would probably have attracted misleading annotations, such as 'involved in chitin synthesis' for nodC [64]. We presume that many other accessory genes are like the nod genes in having specific functions that relate to lifestyle, and that we may eventually elucidate these.

The low GC3s of the accessory genes (Figure 3), also reflected in their distinctive DRA (Figure 5), marks them as different from the core genome. Such genes occur in most sequenced genomes, and are usually regarded as recent arrivals via horizontal gene transfer from a donor whose composition they are presumed to reflect [20]. However, a consideration of the Rlv3841 genome challenges this view. First, acquisition from arbitrary donors cannot explain the relatively consistent composition of the accessory genome (Figure 5); many segments of R. leguminosarum plasmids resemble the Agrobacterium plasmids in composition, but none resemble the Agrobacterium chromosomes. Even more compellingly, nod genes consistently have lower GC3s than is typical for the host genome in any of the wide range of both α-proteobacteria and β-proteobacteria that are known to carry them [65, 66], and those of Rlv3841 conform to this pattern (Figure 3).

The hypothesis that the composition of accessory genes reflects the genomic norm of their donor would require that there is an unknown 'real rhizobium' out there, with low genomic GC3s, that has relatively recently donated the nod genes to all the diverse nodulating bacteria currently known. This seems highly implausible, and in fact a recent radiation is ruled out by the high sequence divergence among homologous nod genes [67]. Instead, the example of the nodulation genes points to the existence of an accessory gene pool that maintains a distinctive composition despite an apparent long-term cohabitation with core genomes that equilibrate to quite different compositions. The age of the common ancestor of nodulated legumes has been estimated at 59 million years [68], and the nodulation (nod) genes that determine host specificity have probably been diverging for a similar length of time. Although this has been long enough for sequence divergence in excess of 60% [69], nod genes are certainly much more recent than the common ancestor of all of the bacteria that currently carry them; Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium are thought to have been separated for 500 million years [70] and the β-proteobacterial symbionts are, of course, more distant still. The nod genes are therefore indisputably part of the horizontally transferred accessory gene pool.

The distinction between core and accessory genomes is well illustrated by the large Rlv3841 genome with its multiple replicons, but this appears to be a widespread property of bacterial genomes [26]. Genes in E. coli that have no known homologs in other genomes (for instance, ORFans) are short, have low G+C and evolve rapidly, but they ameliorate to the core genome composition very slowly [71]. We can only speculate on whether the distinctive composition of accessory genes is due to selection for properties favorable for gene transfer, or to different mutational bias, perhaps reflecting a history of replication in plasmids or phages rather than chromosomes. Low G+C is typical of genes in phages, including 'morons' [26], which are not needed for phage functions and may be thought of as host accessory genes in transit. A low G+C content may make DNA less susceptible to attack by restriction enzymes [26] and more likely to undergo recombination [72]. Phages appear to be the major vectors of the accessory gene pool in E. coli and are probably significant in rhizobia too, but large transmissible plasmids such as pRL7 and pRL8 are common in rhizobia and probably play an important role. Not all accessory genes are currently on plasmids but their location varies between genomes, and so it is plausible that any accessory gene will have spent part of its recent history on plasmids, as supposed by Campbell [19]. The chromosome of Rlv3841 has many distinct 'islands' of genes with typical accessory characteristics: low GC3s and a sporadic phylogenetic distribution (Figure 3). This subset is rich in genes of unknown function. These are part of the accessory genome residing, probably temporarily, in the chromosome.

More enigmatic are the many genes that are not in quartops, which indeed are often unique to Rlv3841, and yet have the typical composition of the core genome. These are not readily classified as either typical accessory or core genes but may form a third category. Possible examples are the σ factor genes pRL100385, pRL110418, and pRL110007, which all have high GC3s but no orthologs in S. meliloti or A. tumefaciens, and many of the ABC transporter genes (Figure 8). Genes with these characteristics are particularly abundant on the large plasmids of Rlv3841 (Figure 3), and unrelated genes with similar characteristics are found on the second chromosomes of Agrobacterium and Brucella and pSymB of Sinorhizobium [3, 68]. Their composition implies a long-term relationship with their host genome, but their sporadic distribution suggests that they confer special, perhaps strain-specific or species-specific, adaptations rather than core functions.

Although there are consistent average differences between the core and (one or more) accessory classes of genes, the dividing line is not clear cut. There is a continuous, unimodal distribution of GC3s values (Figure 3), and the designation of 'core' depends on the choice of genomes for comparison. Furthermore, there are some accessory genes, such as pRL110418 (for the actinomycete-like σ factor) that appear to be genuinely 'foreign' and do not have the composition of the long-term accessory genome. The notion of distinct categories is, of course, an oversimplification, but it provides a framework for understanding the organization of the genome.

Questions that the genome raises about bacterial function, evolution, and ecology

The genome of Rlv3841 is a snapshot of one example of an R. leguminosarum genome. We know that the number and size of plasmids, and the complement of genes, differ in other isolates of the species. Now that we have so many snapshots of bacterial genomes, the challenge is to elucidate the assembly rules. What is constant and what is ephemeral? Which parts of the accessory genome are species specific, and which range more widely? If accessory genes are adapted to a nomadic life in which they perpetually move between genomes, how is their regulation integrated into the host cell? The fact that Rlv3841 shares more genes with the other rhizobia S. meliloti and M. loti than with its closer relative A. tumefaciens (Table 3) supports the idea that the accessory genome is related to lifestyle and that accessory genes can confer different ecologic niches on similar core genomes. This conclusion must be tempered, though, by the realization that bacteria can be multifunctional and isolates that successfully combine rhizobial and agrobacterial properties have been found [73].

If accessory genes are sporadically distributed and mobile, then similarity in the core genome does not guarantee that bacteria are similar in ecology (for example, R. leguminosarum and A. tumefaciens). In the face of a transient accessory genome, does a genomic species have sufficient ecologic coherence to maintain its identity? This is an important question in relation to our understanding of the nature of bacterial species. Cohan has argued that periodic selection purges variation among ecologically equivalent bacteria, and this creates the genetic coherence that allows species to be defined [74]. However, if an ecologic niche is conferred by the accessory genome then it will not be tightly correlated with the core genome, which includes the ribosomal RNA and other genes typically considered to define species. For bacteria with large accessory genomes, genetic processes (homologous recombination) may be more important than ecologic processes (periodic selection) in maintaining coherence of the core genome of the species.

A related issue concerns the numerous surveys of bacterial diversity based on libraries of ribosomal RNA genes [75]. Although these have been very successful in expanding our awareness of microbial communities, the ecologic significance of the diversity [76] is more difficult to establish because of the weak linkage between core genome and accessory adaptations. On the other hand, metagenomic studies give us access to the ecologically important accessory genes (if only we knew how to read them!) but, except in the simplest communities, we do not know with which core genomes they are associated [77].


The genome of R. leguminosarum strain 3841 is unusual in having six large plasmids in addition to a large chromosome. At least two-thirds and perhaps more than 90% of its 7,263 genes must be considered accessory because they are not universally shared even among closely related species. The core, putatively essential, genes have a characteristic high G+C composition, whereas the accessory genes range from those that share this core-like composition, such as many ABC transporter genes, to those that have much lower G+C, including most known symbiosis-related genes. Accessory genes are more frequent on the plasmids, but are also found in genomic islands scattered through the chromosome. They surely hold the key to unraveling bacterial adaptation and specialization, but for the moment the great majority remain of unknown function.

Bacteria with large complex genomes are abundant and important in nature, and so this genome of Rlv3841 should serve as a further reference point for developing our understanding in many directions.

Materials and methods

Sequencing strategy and annotation

Rlv3841 [15, 16] was grown to mid-log phase in TY medium [78] and genomic DNA was isolated using a Blood and Cell Culture DNA midi kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). DNA was sonicated and size selected on an agarose gel, and used to make libraries in pUC18, pMAQ1b, m13MP18, and pBACe3.6.

The final assembly was based on 60,600 paired end-reads from a pUC18 library (insert sizes 3.0-3.3 kb) and 54,700 paired end-reads from a pMAQ1b library (inserts 5.5-6.0 kb), with a further 9,000 single reads from an m13mp18 library to give 7.6-fold sequence coverage of the genome. To produce a scaffold, 2520 reads were generated from a 23-48 kb insert library in pBACe3.6, giving about 5.8× clone coverage. Sequencing was done using Amersham Big-Dye (Amersham, UK) terminator chemistry on ABI3700 sequencing machines. The sequence was assembled with Phrap (Green P, unpublished data) and finished using GAP4 [79]. To finish the sequence, approximately 13,400 extra reads were generated to fill gaps and ensure that all bases were covered by reads on both strands or with different chemistries. All identified repeats were bridged using read-pairs or end-sequenced polymerase chain reaction products. The three rRNA operons were identical; whole-genome shotgun reads did not indicate any polymorphisms, and each operon was independently sequenced from BAC clones or long-range polymerase chain reaction products to confirm this.

The finished sequence was annotated using Artemis software [80]. Initial coding sequence predictions were performed using Orpheus and Glimmer2 software [81, 82]. The two predictions were amalgamated, and codon usage, positional base preference, and comparisons with nonredundant protein databases using BLAST and FASTA software were used to curate the predictions. The entire DNA sequence was also compared in all six reading frames against nonredundant protein databases, using BLASTX, to identify all possible coding sequences. Protein motifs were identified with Pfam and Prosite, transmembrane domains with TMHMM [83], signal sequences with SignalP [84], rRNA genes with BLASTN, and tRNAs with tRNAscan-SE [85]. Functional assignments, EC numbers, and other information, including functional classes in the Riley classification [86], were all manually curated. Artemis Comparison Tool [87] was used to visualize BLASTN and TBLASTX comparisons between genomes. Pseudogenes had one or more inactivating mutations, which were checked against the original sequencing data.

The data have been submitted to the EMBL database (accession numbers AM236080 to AM236086).

Bioinformatic analyses

Quartets of orthologous proteins (quartops) were sets of reciprocal top-scoring BLASTP hits (putative orthologs) in all pairwise genome comparisons between R. leguminosarum, S. meliloti, M. loti, and A tumefaciens [37]. A narrower 'core' was similarly defined using additional comparisons with B. japonicum, Brucella melitensis, and Caulobacter crescentus. Genome sequences for these comparisons were downloaded from GenBank. For each quartop, the three posterior probabilities were calculated with MrBayes version 3 [88].

Symmetrized DRA frequencies were calculated in each replicon for nonoverlapping windows of varying sizes using custom-made Perl scripts. This calculation is based on an odds ratio, which considers the observed frequency divided by the expected frequency of each dinucleotide [22, 35, 8991]. Symmetrized frequencies were obtained by concatenating the original sequence with its inverted complementary sequence; this reduced the 16 original dinucleotides to 10 and controlled for strand bias, allowing for the comparison of different species. This analysis results in a 10 × n matrix, where n is the number of genomic windows. Principal components analysis was carried out in MATLAB version 6.5 release 13 using the MVARTOOLS toolbox. The percentage variance represented by each principal component was assessed through the construction of a scree plot. With 84.5% of the total variance explained by principal components 1 and 2, these axes alone were deemed sufficient for analysis (PC1 48.9% and PC2 35.6%).

GC3s content of individual genes was calculated using CODONW [92].

Additional data files

The following additional data are included with the online version of this article: A text file containing a tab-separated table of all of the protein-encoding genes with Riley functional class, location, GC3s, peptide length, quartop membership, presence/absence of homologs in related species, and (where appropriate) ABC transporter classification (Additional data file 1); a text file containing a key to Riley functional classes (Additional data file 2); and a text file containing a list of genes that encode central metabolic pathways (Additional data file 3).


  1. Gage DJ: Infection and invasion of roots by symbiotic, nitrogen-fixing rhizobia during nodulation of temperate legumes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004, 68: 280-300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Alsmark CM, Frank AC, Karlberg EO, Legault B-A, Ardell DH, Canback B, Eriksson A-S, Naslund AK, Handley SA, Huvet M, et al: The louse-borne human pathogen Bartonella quintana is a genomic derivative of the zoonotic agent Bartonella henselae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 9716-9721.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. DelVecchio VG, Kapatral V, Redkar RJ, Patra G, Mujer C, Los T, Ivanova N, Anderson I, Bhattacharyya A, Lykidis A, et al: The genome sequence of the facultative intracellular pathogen Brucella melitensis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 443-448.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Jumas-Bilak E, Michaux-Charachon S, Bourg G, O'Callaghan D, Ramuz M: Differences in chromosome number and genome rearrangements in the genus Brucella. Mol Microbiol. 1998, 27: 99-106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Paulsen IT, Seshadri R, Nelson KE, Eisen JA, Heidelberg JF, Read TD, Dodson RJ, Umayam L, Brinkac LM, Beanan MJ, et al: The Brucella suis genome reveals fundamental similarities between animal and plant pathogens and symbionts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 13148-13153.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Goodner B, Hinkle G, Gattung S, Miller N, Blanchard M, Qurollo B, Goldman BS, Cao YW, Askenazi M, Halling C, et al: Genome sequence of the plant pathogen and biotechnology agent Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58. Science. 2001, 294: 2323-2328.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wood DW, Setubal JC, Kaul R, Monks DE, Kitajima JP, Okura VK, Zhou Y, Chen L, Wood GE, Almeida NF, et al: The genome of the natural genetic engineer Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58. Science. 2001, 294: 2317-2323.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Galibert F, Finan TM, Long SR, Puhler A, Abola P, Ampe F, Barloy-Hubler F, Barnett MJ, Becker A, Boistard P, et al: The composite genome of the legume symbiont Sinorhizobium meliloti. Science. 2001, 293: 668-672.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaneko T, Nakamura Y, Sato S, Minamisawa K, Uchiumi T, Sasamoto S, Watanabe A, Idesawa K, Iriguchi M, Kawashima K, et al: Complete genomic sequence of nitrogen-fixing symbiotic bacterium Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA110. DNA Res. 2002, 9: 189-197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaneko T, Nakamura Y, Sato S, Asamizu E, Kato T, Sasamoto S, Watanabe A, Idesawa K, Ishikawa A, Kawashima K, et al: Complete genome structure of the nitrogen-fixing symbiotic bacterium Mesorhizobium loti. DNA Res. 2000, 7: 331-338.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Laguerre G, Mazurier SI, Amarger N: Plasmid profiles and restriction fragment length polymorphism of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv viciae in field populations. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 1992, 101: 17-26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Laguerre G, Geniaux E, Mazurier SI, Casartelli RR, Amarger N: Conformity and diversity among field isolates of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae, bv. trifolii, and bv. phaseoli revealed by DNA hybridization using chromosome and plasmid probes. Can J Microbiol. 1993, 39: 412-419.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Palmer KM, Young JPW: Higher diversity of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae populations in arable soils than in grass soils. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000, 66: 2445-2450.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Palmer KM, Turner SL, Young JPW: Sequence diversity of the plasmid replication gene repC in the Rhizobiaceae. Plasmid. 2000, 44: 209-219.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnston AWB, Beringer JE: Identification of rhizobium strains in pea root nodules using genetic markers. J Gen Microbiol. 1975, 87: 343-350.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Glenn AR, Poole PS, Hudman JF: Succinate uptake by free-living and bacteroid forms of Rhizobium leguminosarum. J Gen Microbiol. 1980, 119: 267-271.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnston AWB, Hombrecher G, Brewin NJ, Cooper MC: Two transmissible plasmids in Rhizobium leguminosarum strain 300. J Gen Microbiol. 1982, 128: 85-93.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Davey RB, Reanney DC: Extrachromosomal genetic elements and the adaptive evolution of bacteria. Evol Biol. 1980, 13: 113-147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Campbell A: Evolutionary significance of accessory DNA elements in bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1981, 35: 55-83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lawrence JG, Ochman H: Amelioration of bacterial genomes: rates of change and exchange. J Mol Evol. 1997, 44: 383-397.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Médigue C, Rouxel T, Vigier P, Hénaut A, Danchin A: Evidence for horizontal gene transfer in Escherichia coli speciation. J Mol Biol. 1991, 222: 851-856.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Karlin S, Mrazek J, Campbell A: Compositional biases of bacterial genomes and evolutionary implications. J Bacteriol. 1997, 179: 3899-3913.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Sueoka N: On the genetic basis of variation and heterogeneity of DNA base composition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1962, 48: 582-592.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Koski LB, Morton RA, Golding GB: Codon bias and base composition are poor indicators of horizontally transferred genes. Mol Biol Evol. 2001, 18: 404-412.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hooper SD, Berg OG: Gene import or deletion: a study of the different genes in Escherichia coli strains K12 and O157 : H7. J Mol Evol. 2002, 55: 734-744.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Daubin V, Lerat E, Perrière G: The source of laterally transferred genes in bacterial genomes. Genome Biol. 2003, 4: R57-

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lan RT, Reeves PR: Intraspecies variation in bacterial genomes: the need for a species genome concept. Trends Microbiol. 2000, 8: 396-401.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hirsch PR, Van Montagu M, Johnston AWB, Brewin NJ, Schell J: Physical identification of bacteriocinogenic, nodulation and other plasmids in strains of Rhizobium leguminosarum. J Gen Microbiol. 1980, 120: 403-412.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tabata S, Hooykaas PJJ, Oka A: Sequence determination and characterization of the replicator region in the tumor-inducing plasmid pTiB6S3. J Bacteriol. 1989, 171: 1665-1672.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Ramirez-Romero MA, Soberon N, Perez-Oseguera A, Tellez-Sosa J, Cevallos MA: Structural elements required for replication and incompatibility of the Rhizobium etli symbiotic plasmid. J Bacteriol. 2000, 182: 3117-3124.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Margolin W: Spatial regulation of cytokinesis in bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2001, 4: 647-652.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. George R, Kelly SM, Price NC, Erbse A, Fisher M, Lund PA: Three GroEL homologues from Rhizobium leguminosarum have distinct in vitro properties. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004, 324: 822-828.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rodríguez-Quiñones F, Maguire M, Wallington EJ, Gould PS, Yerko V, Downie JA, Lund PA: Two of the three groEL homologues in Rhizobium leguminosarum are dispensable for normal growth. Arch Microbiol. 2005, 183: 253-265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Krishnan HB, Pueppke SG: Characterization of RFRS9, a second member of the Rhizobium fredii repetitive sequence family from the nitrogen-fixing symbiont R. fredii USDA257. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993, 59: 150-155.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Karlin S, Burge C: Dinucleotide relative abundance extremes: a genomic signature. Trends Genet. 1995, 11: 283-290.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lawrence JG, Hendrickson H: Lateral gene transfer: when will adolescence end?. Mol Microbiol. 2003, 50: 739-749.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhaxybayeva O, Gogarten JP: Bootstrap, Bayesian probability and maximum likelihood mapping: exploring new tools for comparative genome analyses. BMC Genomics. 2002, 3: 4-

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Studholme DJ, Downie JA, Preston GM: Protein domains and architectural innovation in plant-associated Proteobacteria. BMC Genomics. 2005, 6: 17-

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Helmann JD: The extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factors. Advances in Microbial Physiology. 2002, 46: 47-110.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Wexler M, Yeoman KH, Stevens JB, de Luca NG, Sawers G, Johnston AWB: The Rhizobium leguminosarum tonB gene is required for the uptake of siderophore and haem as sources of iron. Mol Microbiol. 2001, 41: 801-816.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Yeoman KH, Curson ARJ, Todd JD, Sawers G, Johnston AWB: Evidence that the Rhizobium regulatory protein RirA binds to cis-acting iron-responsive operators (IROs) at promoters of some Fe-regulated genes. Microbiology. 2004, 150: 4065-4074.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Pardo MA, Lagunez J, Miranda J, Martinez E: Nodulating ability of Rhizobium tropici is conditioned by a plasmid-encoded citrate synthase. Mol Microbiol. 1994, 11: 315-321.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Prell J, Boesten B, Poole P, Priefer UB: The Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae VF39 gamma-aminobutyrate (GABA) aminotransferase gene (gabT) is induced by GABA and highly expressed in bacteroids. Microbiology. 2002, 148: 615-623.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Lodwig EM, Hosie AHF, Bourdes A, Findlay K, Allaway D, Karunakaran R, Downie JA, Poole PS: Amino-acid cycling drives nitrogen fixation in the legume- Rhizobium symbiosis. Nature. 2003, 422: 722-726.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Lodwig E, Poole P: Metabolism of rhizobium bacteroids. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2003, 22: 37-78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Fuhrer T, Fischer E, Sauer U: Experimental identification and quantification of glucose metabolism in seven bacterial species. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187: 1581-1590.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Mulongoy K, Elkan GH: Glucose catabolism in two derivatives of a Rhizobium japonicum strain differing in nitrogen-fixing efficiency. J Bacteriol. 1977, 131: 179-187.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Cubo MT, Economou A, Murphy G, Johnston AWB, Downie JA: Molecular characterization and regulation of the rhizosphere-expressed genes rhiABCR that can influence nodulation by Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae. J Bacteriol. 1992, 174: 4026-4035.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Patschkowski T, Schluter A, Priefer UB: Rhizobium leguminosarum bv viciae contains a second fnr/fixK -like gene and an unusual fixL homologue. Mol Microbiol. 1996, 21: 267-280.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Schluter A, Patschkowski T, Quandt J, Selinger LB, Weidner S, Kramer M, Zhou LM, Hynes MF, Priefer UB: Functional and regulatory analysis of the two copies of the fixNOQP operon of Rhizobium leguminosarum strain VF39. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 1997, 10: 605-616.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Gutierrez D, Hernando Y, Palacios J, Imperial J, Ruiz-Argueso T: FnrN controls symbiotic nitrogen fixation and hydrogenase activities in Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae UPM791. J Bacteriol. 1997, 179: 5264-5270.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Perna NT, Plunkett G, Burland V, Mau B, Glasner JD, Rose DJ, Mayhew GF, Evans PS, Gregor J, Kirkpatrick HA, et al: Genome sequence of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157 : H7. Nature. 2001, 409: 529-533.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Parkhill J, Dougan G, James KD, Thomson NR, Pickard D, Wain J, Churcher C, Mungall KL, Bentley SD, Holden MTG, et al: Complete genome sequence of a multiple drug resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi CT18. Nature. 2001, 413: 848-852.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Holden MT, Feil EJ, Lindsay JA, Peacock SJ, Day NPJ, Enright MC, Foster TJ, Moore CE, Hurst L, Atkin R, et al: Complete genomes of two clinical Staphylococcus aureus strains: Evidence for the rapid evolution of virulence and drug resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 9786-9791.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Leyva A, Palacios JM, Murillo J, Ruiz-Argueso T: Genetic organization of the hydrogen uptake (hup) cluster from Rhizobium leguminosarum. J Bacteriol. 1990, 172: 1647-1655.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Brewin NJ, Dejong TM, Phillips DA, Johnston AWB: Co-transfer of determinants for hydrogenase activity and nodulation ability in Rhizobium leguminosarum. Nature. 1980, 288: 77-79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Rigottier-Gois L, Turner SL, Young JPW, Amarger N: Distribution of repC plasmid-replication sequences among plasmids and isolates of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae from field populations. Microbiology. 1998, 144: 771-780.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Mutch LA, Young JPW: Diversity and specificity of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae on wild and cultivated legumes. Mol Ecol. 2004, 13: 2435-2444.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Young JPW, Wexler M: Sym plasmid and chromosomal genotypes are correlated in field populations of Rhizobium leguminosarum. J Gen Microbiol. 1988, 134: 2731-2739.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Goffeau A, Barrell BG, Bussey H, Davis RW, Dujon B, Feldmann H, Galibert F, Hoheisel JD, Jacq C, Johnston M, et al: Life with 6000 genes. Science. 1996, 274: 546-567.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Wood V, Gwilliam R, Rajandream M-A, Lyne M, Lyne R, Stewart A, Sgouros J, Peat N, Hayles J, Baker S, et al: The genome sequence of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nature. 2002, 415: 871-880.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Chain P, Lamerdin J, Larimer F, Regala W, Lao V, Land M, Hauser L, Hooper A, Klotz M, Norton J, et al: Complete genome sequence of the ammonia-oxidizing bacterium and obligate chemolithoautotroph Nitrosomonas europaea. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185: 2759-2773.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Fischer D, Eisenberg D: Finding families for genomic ORFans. Bioinformatics. 1999, 15: 759-762.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Bulawa CE: Csd2, Csd3, and Csd4, genes required for chitin synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae : the Csd2 gene product is related to chitin synthases and to developmentally regulated proteins in Rhizobium species and Xenopus laevis. Mol Cell Biol. 1992, 12: 1764-1776.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Downie JA, Young JPW: Genome sequencing: the ABC of symbiosis. Nature. 2001, 412: 597-598.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Chen WM, Moulin L, Bontemps C, Vandamme P, Bena G, Boivin-Masson C: Legume symbiotic nitrogen fixation by beta-proteobacteria is widespread in nature. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185: 7266-7272.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Haukka K, Lindström K, Young JPW: Three phylogenetic groups of nodA and nifH genes in Sinorhizobium and Mesorhizobium isolates from leguminous trees growing in Africa and Latin America. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998, 64: 419-426.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Lavin M, Herendeen PS, Wojciechowski MF: Evolutionary rates analysis of Leguminosae implicates a rapid diversification of lineages during the tertiary. Syst Biol. 2005, 54: 575-594.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Bontemps C, Golfier G, Gris-Liebe C, Carrere S, Talini L, Boivin-Masson C: Microarray-based detection and typing of the rhizobium nodulation gene nodC : potential of DNA arrays to diagnose biological functions of interest. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005, 71: 8042-8048.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Turner SL, Young JPW: The glutamine synthetases of rhizobia: phylogenetics and evolutionary implications. Mol Biol Evol. 2000, 17: 309-319.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Daubin V, Ochman H: Bacterial genomes as new gene homes: the genealogy of ORFans in E. coli. Genome Res. 2004, 14: 1036-1042.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Gupta RC, Golub EI, Wold MS, Radding CM: Polarity of DNA strand exchange promoted by recombination proteins of the RecA family. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95: 9843-9848.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Velázquez E, Peix A, Zurdo-Piñeiro JL, Palomo JL, Mateos PF, Rivas R, Muñoz-Adelantodo E, Toro N, García-Benavides P, Martínez-Molina E: The coexistence of symbiosis and pathogenicity-determining genes in Rhizobium rhizogenes strains enables them to induce nodules and tumors or hairy roots in plants. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2005, 18: 1325-1332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Cohan FM: What are bacterial species?. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2002, 56: 457-487.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Schloss PD, Handelsman J: Status of the microbial census. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004, 68: 686-691.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Horner-Devine MC, Carney KM, Bohannan BJM: An ecological perspective on bacterial biodiversity. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Sci. 2004, 271: 113-122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Allen EE, Banfield JF: Community genomics in microbial ecology and evolution. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005, 3: 489-498.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Beringer JE: R factor transfer in Rhizobium leguminosarum. J Gen Microbiol. 1974, 84: 188-198.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Bonfield JK, Smith KF, Staden R: A new DNA sequence assembly program. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23: 4992-4999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Rutherford K, Parkhill J, Crook J, Horsnell T, Rice P, Rajandream M-A, Barrell B: Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics. 2000, 16: 944-945.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Frishman D, Mironov A, Mewes H, Gelfand M: Combining diverse evidence for gene recognition in completely sequenced bacterial genomes [published erratum appears in Nucleic Acids Res 1998 Aug 15;26(16):following 3870]. Nucl Acids Res. 1998, 26: 2941-2947.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Delcher A, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg S: Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucl Acids Res. 1999, 27: 4636-4641.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer ELL: Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 2001, 305: 567-580.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Dyrlov Bendtsen J, Nielsen H, von Heijne G, Brunak S: Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0. J Mol Biol. 2004, 340: 783-795.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Lowe T, Eddy S: tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucl Acids Res. 1997, 25: 955-964.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Riley M: Functions of the gene products of Escherichia coli. Microbiol Rev. 1993, 57: 862-952.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Carver TJ, Rutherford KM, Berriman M, Rajandream M-A, Barrell BG, Parkhill J: ACT: the Artemis comparison tool. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21: 3422-3423.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP: MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003, 19: 1572-1574.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Karlin S, Ladunga I, Blaisdell BE: Heterogeneity of genomes: measures and values. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994, 91: 12837-12841.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Burge C, Campbell A, Karlin S: Over- and under-representation of short oligonucleotides in DNA sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992, 89: 1358-1362.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Campbell A, Mrazek J, Karlin S: Genome signature comparisons among prokaryote, plasmid, and mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96: 9184-9189.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Peden JF: Analysis of codon usage. PhD thesis. 1999, Nottingham: University of Nottingham

    Google Scholar 

  93. Saier MH: A functional-phylogenetic classification system for transmembrane solute transporters. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000, 64: 354-411.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


We acknowledge the support of the BBSRC and the Wellcome Trust and the assistance of the WTSI core sequencing and informatics groups. We thank Allan Downie, Michael Hynes, and David Studholme for interesting discussions on aspects of the genome content, and George Allen, Ryan Lower, and James Stephenson for improvements to the annotation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Peter W Young.

Electronic supplementary material


Additional data file 1: A text file containing a tab-separated table of all of the protein-encoding genes with Riley functional class, location, GC3s, peptide length, quartop membership, presence/absence of homologs in related species, and (where appropriate) ABC transporter classification. (TXT 324 KB)

Additional data file 2: A text file containing a key to Riley functional classes. (TXT 6 KB)

Additional data file 3: A text file containing a list of genes that encode central metabolic pathways. (TXT 892 bytes)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Young, J.P.W., Crossman, L.C., Johnston, A.W. et al. The genome of Rhizobium leguminosarum has recognizable core and accessory components. Genome Biol 7, R34 (2006).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: