Skip to main content


Natural antisense transcripts with coding capacity in Arabidopsismay have a regulatory role that is not linked to double-stranded RNA degradation



Overlapping transcripts in antisense orientation have the potential to form double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), a substrate for a number of different RNA-modification pathways. One prominent route for dsRNA is its breakdown by Dicer enzyme complexes into small RNAs, a pathway that is widely exploited by RNA interference technology to inactivate defined genes in transgenic lines. The significance of this pathway for endogenous gene regulation remains unclear.


We have examined transcription data for overlapping gene pairs in Arabidopsis thaliana. On the basis of an analysis of transcripts with coding regions, we find the majority of overlapping gene pairs to be convergently overlapping pairs (COPs), with the potential for dsRNA formation. In all tissues, COP transcripts are present at a higher frequency compared to the overall gene pool. The probability that both the sense and antisense copy of a COP are co-transcribed matches the theoretical value for coexpression under the assumption that the expression of one partner does not affect the expression of the other. Among COPs, we observe an over-representation of spliced (intron-containing) genes (90%) and of genes with alternatively spliced transcripts. For loci where antisense transcripts overlap with sense transcript introns, we also find a significant bias in favor of alternative splicing and variation of polyadenylation.


The results argue against a predominant RNA degradation effect induced by dsRNA formation. Instead, our data support alternative roles for dsRNAs. They suggest that at least for a subgroup of COPs, antisense expression may induce alternative splicing or polyadenylation.


Genome-wide searches in the genomes of several species have identified a surprisingly high proportion of overlapping gene pairs. Depending on the sample sizes analyzed and search criteria, the frequencies for overlapping gene pairs vary between 4% and 9% for the human genome, 1.7%-14% in the murine genome, and up to 22% in the fly genome [1]. The predominant composition of overlapping gene pairs is an antiparallel convergent arrangement [2, 3], where sense and antisense genes overlap within their 3' regions. Joint expression of both these genes in the same cell would allow the partly overlapping transcripts to associate as dsRNA molecules, which may interfere with RNA processing, transport, stability or other molecular mechanisms. Convergently overlapping gene pairs (COPs) can therefore provide the source for natural antisense transcripts (NATs) that may act as regulators of the sense gene. In addition to NATs being transcribed from the same locus as the sense transcript (cis-NATs), NATs can be transcribed from a different locus (trans-NATs), as illustrated by a search for overlapping transcripts with coding capacity in the human genome, which identified 87 cis-NATs and 80 trans-NATs [3].

In bacteria, more than 100 NATs are involved in the regulation of a variety of biological functions, including the control of copy number, conjugation and post-segregational killing in plasmids, lysis/lysogeny switches in phages, and transposition frequency in transposons [4]. In eukaryotes, a very detailed characterization of the molecular role of specific NATs has only been achieved for a few examples.

NAT-mediated interference with splicing is illustrated by the alternative processing of mRNAs of the gene for the thyroid hormone receptor ErbAα, which is regulated by an antisense transcript [5]. Overlapping genes can share a bidirectional poly(A) region as demonstrated for the human genes ABHD1 and Sec12 [6]. Several examples document the fact that antisense transcripts can increase sense transcript stability, when dsRNA regions cover the 3' untranslated region (UTR) and possibly mask out target sequences for RNA cleavage [7]. Alternatively, RNA duplex formation can increase transcript sensitivity and induce site-specific cleavage, as shown for the human TYMS mRNA and TRS antisense transcripts [8].

An example of RNA interference (RNAi)-based regulation of an endogenous gene via NATs is the repression of the testis-expressed Stellate gene in Drosophila by paralogous Su(Ste) tandem repeats [9]. Both strands of repressor Su(Ste) repeats are transcribed, producing sense and antisense RNA, most probably as part of a dsRNA-based silencing mechanism, as Stellate silencing is associated with the presence of short Su(Ste) RNAs. Antisense expression can also affect translation, as illustrated by the influence of an antisense transcript on the translation of different isoforms of fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF2) [10]. In the nucleus, dsRNA can be edited by dsRNA-dependent adenosine deaminases, which convert about 50% of adenosine residues into inosines, leading to the unwinding of the RNA duplex [11]. Inosine-containing RNAs are not translated as they are retained in the nucleus [12].

In mice about 35% of overlapping genes transcribe noncoding RNA. Overlapping genes are scattered around the genome with no apparent bias. Overlaps range from 20 to 3,400 base-pairs (bp) with an average of 372 bp, as far as the quality of transcript annotation allows such predictions. There is some evidence for an over-representation of overlapping genes among specific functional categories, that is, imprinted genes and DNA repair genes [1]. Twenty-two out of 58 known imprinted murine genes are transcribed from both strands. Frequently, one partner transcribes a noncoding RNA. Antisense transcripts may regulate imprinting states of the sense promoter (Kcnq1/Kcnq1ot1) or may induce dsRNA-based gene silencing as proposed for Ifd2R/Air. About 20% of known human DNA repair genes overlap either convergently or divergently in an antiparallel arrangement [1].

Mammalian mRNAs that form sense-antisense pairs frequently exhibit reciprocal expression patterns, but permanent coexpression of sense and antisense transcripts can also occur in some tissues, although it is difficult to prove that both genes are transcribed in the same cell. Coexistence of sense and antisense transcripts may indicate a stabilizing effect of dsRNA, or it may depict cases where RNA duplex formation is impaired as a result of secondary structures, or because sense and antisense transcripts or the enzymes required for duplex formation are separated by compartmentalization [13].

To gain an insight into the existence and role of overlapping antisense pairs in plants, we have screened the Arabidopsis thaliana genome for COPs with sense and antisense genes that encode a protein, and have compared the expression profile of the associated genes.


Overlapping gene pairs in the Arabidopsisgenome

A screen of the Arabidopsis genome for protein-coding genes with overlapping orientations identified 1,083 groups containing a total of 2,147 overlapping genes. For 26 groups, the overlap involves three genes, and for 1,057 groups, two genes are arranged as overlapping pairs (Figure 1 and Additional data file 1). The majority of overlapping gene pairs are organized as COPs. The size of the overlapping region for these 956 COPs varies between 1 and 2,820 bp, with an average length of 431 bp. The genes are scattered around all five chromosomes with no obvious clustering bias (data not shown). Among the 1,912 COP genes, we found nine transposable elements. This is in contrast to the presence of 2,372 transposons among the 30,624 Arabidopsis genes. Transposons are therefore strongly under-represented among COPs, therefore transposon-derived antiparallel gene pairs are under heavy selective pressure. Among the 1,912 genes of the 956 COPs, 954 genes have antisense transcripts that extend into the open reading frame (ORF) region of the sense transcript (Figure a-c and Additional data file 2) but the ORF regions of the sense and antisense transcript overlap for only 13 COPs (Figure 2a and Table 1).

Figure 1

A comparison of the arrangements of overlapping gene pairs in Arabidopsis thaliana. A and A' label the start and end of the sense transcript, B' and B label the start and end of the antisense transcript. The total number of genes involved in group 1, 2 and 3 is 2,157, of which 2,147 are unique; the remaining 10 comprise four genes that are members of both group 1 and group 2 pairs, five genes that are members of both group 1 and group 3 pairs, and 1 gene that is a member of both a group 1 and group 3 pair.

Figure 2

The organization of convergent overlapping gene pairs with respect to the protein coding capacity of the sense and antisense transcripts.

Table 1 COPs with sense-antisense overlaps within the coding regions

To examine the degree of sequence conservation for COPs sense and antisense genes, we used BLAST to search for homologs of each COPs gene. For a subset of 242 genes, we can define 89 homology groups with 2-11 members. The proteins encoded by the sense members of each group are at least 20% identical, with an E-value less than 0.001. An analysis of the degree of sequence conservation among family members showed very low conservation among the coding or promoter regions of the antisense partners of homologous sense genes. With the exception of the largest family, the promoter regions of homologous sense genes are also poorly conserved (Table 2 and Additional data files 4, 5 and 6). With a few exceptions, possibly representing relatively recent duplications, the data indicate that homologous sense genes do not in general have homologous antisense partners.

Table 2 Homology assessment for 89 COPs families that contain 2-11 family members

COPs gene-expression profiles

To analyze the transcriptional activity of COPs sense and antisense genes, we used the GSE636 annotated gene-expression database [14, 15], which provides expression data for 1,866 COPs genes in suspension culture, in 7-day old seedlings, in roots and in flowers. If antisense arrangements are predominantly responsible for dsRNA-mediated transcript degradation, we would expect that a significant proportion of COPs genes would be under-represented among the transcript pool. For the total pool of 26,939 genes represented in the GSE636 database, we find a representation of 49.8-53.1% of these genes among the detectable transcripts (Table 3). Of the 1,866 COPs genes represented among this pool, 63.4-67.9% are expressed, which argues against a specific depletion of COPs transcripts in any of the four sample tissues.

Table 3 Expression analysis of 1,866 COPs genes based on expression data from the GSE636 annotated gene-expression database

This assumption is further supported by the lack of any bias against the joint expression of sense and antisense copies from the same COP. We can calculate a theoretical value for the joint expression of a sense and an antisense member of the same COP based on the representation of the COP genes in the transcriptional pool. If, for example, the probability that a COP gene is expressed in flowers is 67.9%, the probability that any two COP genes are jointly expressed is 67.9% × 67.9%. The expected value of 46.1% matches the observed value of 45.6% determined for the joint expression of both genes of a COP (Table 3). We observe a similar match for the other tissues, which suggests that there is no bias against the joint expression of both COP partner genes. For about 20% of all COPs, both members are jointly expressed in all tissues tested.

We also examined the microarray data provided by the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre (NASC) [16]. Table 4 compiles 21 Affymetrix ATH1 arrays for seven different Arabidopsis tissues based on three replicates for each assay. The datasets were retrieved by searching for BioSource_ID on [17].

Table 4 Expression of 1,596 COPs genes based on the NASC microarray database

Although the expression probabilities of both the total gene pool and the COPs gene pool differ significantly among individual tissues, the expected and observed values for the coexpression of COPs sense and antisense genes again match, reinforcing the lack of any indication of a transcript degradation mechanism (Table 4). To assess whether transcript degradation depends on a specific experimental condition, we assembled the expression data for all 1,437 microarrays that were available. For each microarray, we calculated the proportion of transcripts that were expressed, both for the total gene pool comprising 22,746 genes and for the 1,596 COPs genes represented in the total pool. A depletion of COPs-specific transcripts for any of the 1,437 microarrays should result in a significant reduction of the expressed COPs pool. We do not find a single case where the COPs genes are under-represented among the transcripts detectable in an array experiment. Compared to the transcriptional activity of the whole gene pool, the transcriptional activity of the COPs gene pool is between 1.008 and 1.485 times higher. This argues against a specific reduction in COPs gene activity under any of the experimental conditions used for the array experiments (Additional data file 7).

Indications for a role of antisense transcripts in sense transcript splicing

Among the 1,912 COPs genes we find a considerable bias for splicing. Of the COPs genes, 1,723 (90.1%) are spliced, while among a total of 30,624 Arabidopsis genes only 21,157 (69.1%) genes are spliced. If antisense transcripts played a role in sense transcript alternative splicing, we would expect an enrichment among COPs genes in alternative splicing. Out of the total pool of 30,624 genes, 7.6% encode more than one transcript, which are all alternatively spliced. This proportion rises to 14.5% among the 1,912 COPs genes (Table 5). This increase is even more pronounced in the rice genome, where it increases from 4.4% to 20.9% COPs.

Table 5 Representation of spliced genes among COPs, and correlation analysis for transcript modifications among these genes

To assess if the over-representation of multiple transcripts among COPs was linked to a variation in splicing, transcriptional start site (TSS) or polyadenylation, we analyzed the representation of these modifications among the spliced COPs genes. The results showed a positive bias for alternative splicing (Table 5). Interestingly, this bias was restricted to COPs with an antisense transcript that overlaps the intron region of the sense transcript (Table 6). Moreover, among the COPs with antisense transcripts overlapping at least 40 bp of the sense transcript, we also detected a positive bias for a variation of the polyadenylation sites (Table 6), whereas no positive or negative bias was observed for TSS variation (see Additional data file 8).

Table 6 Analysis of preferences for alternative splicing and polyadenylation site variation among spliced COPs genes, in dependence of the termination site of the antisense transcript

For 146 genes, the antisense transcript terminates within 10 bp away from the intron-exon boundary of the sense transcript (Figure 3 and Additional data file 3). The proportion of alternatively spliced genes among this group increases to 21.2%. We tested whether these COPs genes were specifically prone to alternative splicing of the final exon but could not find any evidence for this assumption (see Additional data file 8).

Figure 3

Illustration of the distance between the end of the antisense transcript and the last intron-exon boundary of the sense transcript. Negative values refer to a termination of the antisense transcript 5' to the intron-exon boundary.

Overall, the enhanced likelihood that members of overlapping gene pairs contain introns, the enrichment in genes encoding alternatively spliced transcripts, and the increased frequency of alternatively spliced and variably polyadenylated transcripts when an intron overlaps with an antisense transcript, suggest that, at least for the majority of overlapping gene pairs, the antisense transcript could play a role in the regulation of splicing and/or polyadenylation.


We have characterised the organization and expression profiles of 956 convergent overlapping gene pairs of A. thaliana to assess the potential molecular mechanisms associated with this unusual gene organization, which provided the opportunity for dsRNA formation as a result of the annealing of a sense and antisense transcript.

In animal genomes especially, a number of different mechanisms have been described that involve dsRNA formation. dsRNA formation can interfere with biological activities that require binding of RNA or proteins to the transcript [13]. This may include processes such as RNA splicing, editing, transport, degradation or translation. Alternatively, dsRNA could function as a trigger for an RNAi process, providing a target for Dicer enzymes, and be specifically degraded to small interfering RNA (siRNA) molecules [18]. The latter mechanism would lead to mutual destruction of the sense and antisense transcripts, whereas antisense transcript-mediated effects on sense RNA processing would not necessarily alter the primary transcript levels, although they could still influence the potential for primary transcript expression.

As in other species [1, 19], the majority of overlapping gene pairs in A. thaliana are arranged in a convergent orientation. Only a very small group of 13 out of 956 COPs show an overlap between the ORFs of the sense and antisense transcripts, which probably reflects the associated evolutionary stress of such an arrangement, as any mutation in the overlapping region would affect both genes. For 50.1% of COPs the sense-antisense overlap does not include any protein-coding region, which makes it unlikely that in this subgroup of COPs the antisense transcript plays a role in regulating the coding region of the sense gene. Antisense transcripts for the members of this group are more likely to jointly use bidirectional poly(A) signals [6] or to regulate transcript stability [7].

We do observe a very high level of joint expression of sense and antisense transcript from overlapping gene pairs. This is in marked contrast to data from Plasmodium falciparum, where only 5% of sense-antisense loci show joint expression [20] and thus support models for a direct regulation of sense transcript by antisense expression via dsRNA degradation. In contrast, the relatively high expression frequency of COPs in Arabidopsis, and the joint presence of sense and antisense transcripts in the same tissue, do not support a dsRNA degradation model. Even a detailed analysis of 1,437 microarrays does not imply that under any conditions or for any specific tissue the COPs gene pool is significantly depleted. While dsRNA-based transcript degradation may occur for some COPs, our data suggest that for the majority of COPs, antisense expression is not linked to transcript degradation pathways.

An interesting observation, which may hint at an alternative interference mechanism between sense and antisense transcripts, is the significant bias for COPs to be spliced, and the enrichment among COPs of alternatively spliced transcripts. These features may indicate a role for antisense transcripts in alternative splicing. Such a mechanism would resemble the effect of antisense expression for the thyroid hormone receptor gene, erbAα, which leads to alternative RNA processing [5]. The bias for antisense transcripts to terminate close to the final intron-exon boundary remains a mystery. One could assume that the termination of the antisense transcript near the final sense intron-exon boundary might reflect a selection for antisense transcripts that interfere with splicing of the last intron. However, we could not observe any positive bias for such events among this COPs gene group.

The assumption that antisense transcripts can interfere with splicing events is further supported by the observation that overlaps between antisense transcripts and a sense intron region generate a bias for alternative splicing and also for polyadenylation variation. This may reflect a linkage between these two mechanisms, which has been demonstrated for animal systems where polyadenylation and the splicing of the final intron especially can be coupled [21].

During the review process of this paper, a similar study by Wang and co-workers [22] was published. The main differences between the two studies are in the sets of overlapping genes considered, and the nature of the experimental evidence of gene expression. While we consider only gene pairs where both partners show evidence of protein-coding capacity, Wang and co-workers also considered cases where at least one transcript may not be protein coding. We base our studies of expression on two large microarray datasets, while Wang and co-workers use data from a massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS) study. While we find no evidence in the microarray data of exclusive transcription relationships for COPs gene pairs, the MPSS evidence of exclusive transcription of the gene pairs in the Wang study is clear. This apparent contradiction may be explained by differences in the gene sets studied, particularly as expression data is only available for a subset of the genes in each study, or by differences in the quality of the expression data. Nevertheless, the two studies taken together give evidence of various significant biological consequences of gene overlaps, including effects on sense gene splicing or polyadenylation (our study) and coexpression of gene pairs [22].

It is important to remember that in our study, we have concentrated on a specific subgroup of convergently overlapping genes, with both sense and antisense transcripts encoding an ORF. Among this group there may be an over-representation of gene pairs for which sense and antisense transcription jointly regulate the production efficiency of both proteins, for example via the common use of a bidirectional polyadenylation region, or by co-editing of both strands associated as dsRNA. Such mechanisms would require the joint transcription of both genes in the same tissue, and our data do suggest that sense and antisense transcripts are frequently coexpressed. On the other hand, one would assume that co-regulation would preferentially be used for genes encoding proteins that are linked in their biological role. One would therefore expect a high degree of conservation for both proteins among homologous COPs, whereas our data show that COPs with homologous proteins encoded by their sense genes do not show the same conservation for the proteins encoded by their antisense genes.

The selection of sense/antisense transcripts with coding capacity may also be the reason for the lack of an indication of dsRNA-based degradation of COPs. A considerable proportion of overlapping antisense genes are noncoding RNAs [23] or are trans-NATs transcribed from different genetic loci [3]. These overlapping transcript types may contain a much higher proportion of genes regulated by transcript degradation than the COPs analyzed in this study. A final confirmation of the role of dsRNA for individual genes will require a more detailed experimental analysis. Our analysis should, however, provide a useful first step in defining distinct groups of COP genes as a basis for a more detailed molecular characterization.


The Arabidopsis genome contains 956 COPs with coding capacity that have the potential to form dsRNA. In contrast to data from other species, a comparative expression analysis indicates that sense and antisense transcripts of COPs loci can coexist in the same tissue at the same frequency as the transcripts of any other unlinked genes, with no indication of specific degradation of such sense-antisense transcript pairs. This observation does not exclude the presence of dsRNA degradation pathways for individual loci, but it refocuses the attention on alternative roles for natural antisense transcripts in plants, preferentially those that do not lead to an overall change in transcript levels but rather affect transcript processing or localization. In line with this view, we observe a high proportion of intron-containing genes in COPs, in both Arabidopsis and rice, and an enrichment for genes with alternatively spliced transcripts, indicative of a role for some COP antisense transcripts in splicing modification. In addition, we detect a potential link between alternative splicing and poly(A) site variation. This work provides a set of databases for COPs, based on the degree of sense-antisense overlap and expression, which should provide a basis for the selection of individual candidate loci for a detailed molecular analysis of the different dsRNA pathways.

Materials and methods

Analysis of overlapping transcripts

All Arabidopsis genome information, including gene ID (AGI code), transcript orientation, and gene and exon position coordinates of transcripts with coding regions, was downloaded from The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) ftp website [24]. These data were stored in a MySQL database [25] designed for general genomic analysis, and the overlapping transcript analysis was implemented with custom SQL language queries and Perl scripts using the Perl DBI module. The rice genome data were obtained from [26, 27].

Analysis of gene variation

Genes with more than one transcript were further analyzed for variation in TSS, polyadenylation site, and alternative splicing. TSS variation was detected by comparing the starting genomic positions of the first exons of genes with more than one transcript, and variation in the polyadenylation site by comparing the ends of the last exons. Genes with more than one transcript that had identical TSSs and polyadenylation sites, or had different numbers of exons, were considered as alternatively spliced. Genes with more than one transcript that had the same number of exons and variation in TSS and polyadenylation site, underwent comparison of their intron boundaries to detect alternative splicing. To detect alternative splicing in the last intron, alternatively spliced transcripts underwent comparison of the borders of their last intron.

Hypergeometric distribution

p-values for over- or under-representations of genes were calculated as the upper or lower tail of the hypergeometric distribution p(x ≥ X) or p(xX), respectively, where p(x;N,R,k) = C(R,x)C(N - R,k - x)/C(N,k). Here p refers to the probability that a list of k genes should contain x genes with a particular property (for example, alternative splicing), when the list has been selected randomly without replacement from a set of N genes in which R genes exhibit the same property. C(n,m) is the number of distinct combinations of m objects that can be drawn from a set of n objects. The hypergeometric distribution was calculated with the R package [28].

Microarray data

Arabidopsis microarray data were obtained from two sources. The dataset from Gene Expression Omnibus [14, 15] with accession number GSE636 is a collection of microarray experiments using high-density oligonucleotide arrays. It contains transcriptional activity information (detection call only) for the complete set of all protein-coding genes in different tissues. The Affymetrix ATH1 array data were acquired using the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre (NASC) AffyWatch service [16]. In NASC's datasets, including 1,437 arrays for 93 experimental purposes, the transcription information for each gene consists of detection call and signal value, as calculated from the Affymetrix MAS 5.0 analysis algorithms [29]. The analysis of expression data reported in Results was achieved using a combination of Perl script processing and Microsoft Excel spreadsheet analysis.

Coding region and upstream sequence similarity analysis of homologous COP genes

The COPs genes were clustered on the basis of their protein sequences with a 20% similarity threshold using the program BLASTclust [30]. The similarity of the associated coding and upstream regulatory regions within each cluster were tested by pairwise searches using BLAST2P [31].

Additional data files

The following additional files are available with the online version of this paper. Additional data file 1 is a supplement to Figure 1 listing all overlapping genes with ID, annotation and size of overlapping region. Additional data file 2 is a supplement to Figure 2 classifying 1,912 COPs genes according to their overlapping regions. Additional data file 3 is a supplement to Figure 3, calculating the antisense transcript end position in relation to the sense intron-exon boundary for the 956 COPs pairs. Additional data file 4 is a supplement A to Table 2, listing 242 COPs member genes of 89 COPs families. Additional data file 5 is a supplement B to Table 2, comparing homology among 1 kb promoter regions of COPs family members. Additional data file 6 is a supplement C to Table 2, comparing homology among sense and antisense encoded proteins for members of 89 COPs families. Additional data file 7 is a supplement to Table 4, showing expression analysis of the total gene pool and the COPs gene pool for 1,437 microarray experiments. Additional data file 8 is a supplement to Table 6, including a correlation analysis of alternative splicing, TSS variation and polyadenylation variation for COPs with respect to the termination of the antisense transcript in relation to the sense intron-exon boundary.


  1. 1.

    Boi S, Solda G, Tenchini ML: Shedding light on the dark side of the genome: overlapping genes in higher eukaryotes. Curr Genomics. 2004, 5: 509-524. 10.2174/1389202043349020.

  2. 2.

    Fahey ME, Moore TF, Higgins DG: Overlapping antisense transcription in the human genome. Comp Funct Genomics. 2002, 3: 244-253. 10.1002/cfg.173.

  3. 3.

    Lehner B, Williams G, Campbell RD, Sanderson CM: Antisense transcripts in the human genome. Trends Genet. 2002, 18: 63-65. 10.1016/S0168-9525(02)02598-2.

  4. 4.

    Wagner EGH, Flardh K: Antisense RNAs everywhere?. Trends Genet. 2002, 18: 223-226. 10.1016/S0168-9525(02)02658-6.

  5. 5.

    Hastings ML, Milcarek C, Martincic K, Peterson ML, Munroe SH: Expression of the thyroid hormone receptor gene, erbAα, in B lymphocytes: alternative mRNA processing is independent of differentiation but correlates with antisense RNA levels. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 4296-4300. 10.1093/nar/25.21.4296.

  6. 6.

    Edgar A: The gene structure and expression of human ABHD1: overlapping polyadenylation signal sequence with Sec12. BMC Genomics. 2003, 4: 18-10.1186/1471-2164-4-18.

  7. 7.

    Gray TA, Azama K, Whitmore K, Min A, Abe S, Nicholls RD: Phylogenetic conservation of the Makorin-2 gene, encoding a multiple zinc-finger protein, antisense to the RAF1 proto-oncogene. Genomics. 2001, 77: 119-126. 10.1006/geno.2001.6627.

  8. 8.

    Chu J, Dolnick BJ: Natural antisense (rTS[α]) RNA induces site-specific cleavage of thymidylate synthase mRNA. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002, 1587: 183-193. 10.1016/S0925-4439(02)00081-9.

  9. 9.

    Aravin AA, Naumova NM, Tulin AV, Vagin VV, Rozovsky YM, Gvozdev VA: Double-stranded RNA-mediated silencing of genomic tandem repeats and transposable elements in the D. melanogaster germline. Curr Biol. 2001, 11: 1017-1027. 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00299-8.

  10. 10.

    Li AW, Murphy PR: Erratum to expression of alternatively spliced FGF-2 antisense RNA transcripts in the central nervous system: regulation of FGF-2 mRNA translation. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2000, 170: 231-242. 10.1016/S0303-7207(00)00440-8.

  11. 11.

    Bass BL, Weintraub H: An unwinding activity that covalently modifies its double-stranded RNA substrate. Cell. 1988, 55: 1089-1098. 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90253-X.

  12. 12.

    Zhang Z, Carmichael GG: The fate of dsRNA in the nucleus: a p54nrb-containing complex mediates the nuclear retention of promiscuously A-to-I edited RNAs. Cell. 2001, 106: 465-475. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00466-4.

  13. 13.

    Vanhee-Brossollet C, Vaquero C: Do natural antisense transcripts make sense in eukaryotes?. Gene. 1998, 211: 1-9. 10.1016/S0378-1119(98)00093-6.

  14. 14.

    Gene Expression Omnibus. []

  15. 15.

    Barrett T, Suzek TO, Troup DB, Wilhite SE, Ngau WC, Ledoux P, Rudnev D, Lash AE, Fujibuchi W, Edgar R: NCBI GEO: mining millions of expression profiles - database and tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, D562-D566. 33 Database

  16. 16.

    Craigon D, James N, Okyere J, Higgins J, Jotham J, May S: NASCArrays: a repository for microarray data generated by NASC's transcriptomics service. Nucleic Acid Res. 2004, D575-D577. 10.1093/nar/gkh133. 32 Database

  17. 17.

    NASCA Arrays: Affymetrix ATH1 arrays database. []

  18. 18.

    Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE, Mello CC: Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 1998, 391: 806-811. 10.1038/35888.

  19. 19.

    Lavorgna G, Dahary D, Lehner B, Sorek R, Sanderson CM, Casari G: In search of antisense. Trends Biochem Sci. 2004, 29: 88-94. 10.1016/j.tibs.2003.12.002.

  20. 20.

    Gunasekera AM, Patankar S, Schug J, Eisen G, Kissinger J, Roos D, Wirth DF: Widespread distribution of antisense transcripts in the Plasmodium falciparum genome. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2004, 136: 35-42. 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2004.02.007.

  21. 21.

    Bauren G, Belikov S, Wieslander L: Transcriptional termination in the Balbiani ring 1gene is closely coupled to 3'-end formation and excision of the 3'-terminal intron. Genes Dev. 1998, 12: 2759-2769.

  22. 22.

    Wang X-J, Gaasterland T, Chua N-H: Genome-wide prediction and identification of cis-natural antisense transcripts in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Biol. 2005, 6: R30-10.1186/gb-2005-6-4-r30.

  23. 23.

    Kiyosawa H, Yamanaka I, Osato N, Kondo S, Hayashizaki Y: Antisense transcripts with FANTOM2 clone set and their implications for gene regulation. Genome Res. 2003, 13: 1324-1334. 10.1101/gr.982903.

  24. 24.

    TAIR ftp website. []

  25. 25.

    DuBois P: MySQL. 2000, Indianapolis, IN: New Riders Publishing

  26. 26.

    TIGR rice: rice expression database. []

  27. 27.

    O. sativa database. []

  28. 28.

    Ihaka R, Gentlement G: R:A language for data analysis and graphics. J Comp Graph Statist. 1996, 5: 299-314.

  29. 29.

    Hubbell E, Liu WM, Mei R: Robust estimators for expression analysis. Bioinformatics. 2002, 18: 1585-1592. 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.12.1585.

  30. 30.

    McGinnis S, Madden TL: BLAST: at the core of a powerful and diverse set of sequence analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32: W20-W25. 10.1093/nar/gnh003.

  31. 31.

    Yuan J, Bush B, Elbrecht A, Liu Y, Zhang T, Zhao W, Blevins R: Enhanced homology searching through genome reading frame predetermination. Bioinformatics. 2004, 20: 1416-1427. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth115.

Download references


We are grateful to Athanasios Theologis for providing access to the GSE636 database. This work was supported by a European Commission grant to the Epigenome Network of Excellence (503433).

Author information

Correspondence to Peter Meyer.

Electronic supplementary material

Additional File 1: Supplement to Figure 1. List of all overlapping genes with ID, annotation and size of overlapping region. List of all overlapping genes with ID, annotation and size of overlapping region (XLS 266 KB)

Additional File 2: Supplement to Figure 2. Classification of 1,912 COPs genes according to their overlapping regions. Classification of 1,912 COPs genes according to their overlapping regions (XLS 328 KB)

Additional File 3: Supplement to Figure 3. Calculation of the antisense transcript end position in relation to the sense intron-exon boundary for the 956 COPs pairs. Calculation of the antisense transcript end position in relation to the sense intron-exon boundary for the 956 COPs pairs (XLS 132 KB)

Additional File 4: Supplement A to Table 2. 242 COPs member genes of 89 COPs families. 242 COPs member genes of 89 COPs families (XLS 54 KB)

Additional File 5: Supplement B to Table 2. Comparison of homology among 1 kb promoter regions of COPs family members. Comparison of homology among 1 kb promoter regions of COPs family members (XLS 82 KB)

Additional File 6: Supplement C to Table 2. Homology comparison among sense and antisense encoded proteins for members of 89 COPs families. Homology comparison among sense and antisense encoded proteins for members of 89 COPs families (XLS 151 KB)

Additional File 7: Supplement to Table 4. Expression analysis of the total gene pool and the COPs gene pool for 1,437 microarray experiments. Expression analysis of the total gene pool and the COPs gene pool for 1,437 microarray experiments (XLS 306 KB)

Additional File 8: Supplement to Table 6. Correlation analysis of alternative splicing, TSS variation and polyadenylation variation for COPs with respect to the termination of the antisense transcript in relation to the sense intron-exon boundary. Correlation analysis of alternative splicing, TSS variation and polyadenylation variation for COPs with respect to the termination of the antisense transcript in relation to the sense intron-exon boundary (PDF 46 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jen, C., Michalopoulos, I., Westhead, D.R. et al. Natural antisense transcripts with coding capacity in Arabidopsismay have a regulatory role that is not linked to double-stranded RNA degradation. Genome Biol 6, R51 (2005).

Download citation


  • Alternative Splice
  • Additional Data File
  • Antisense Transcript
  • Polyadenylation Site
  • Massively Parallel Signature Sequencing