- Open Access
The society of genes: networks of functional links between genes from comparative genomics
© Yanai and DeLisi, licensee BioMed Central Ltd 2002
- Received: 12 March 2002
- Accepted: 11 September 2002
- Published: 25 October 2002
Comparative genomics provides at least three methods beyond traditional sequence similarity for identifying functional links between genes: the examination of common phylogenetic distributions, the analysis of conserved proximity along the chromosomes of multiple genomes, and observations of fusions of genes into a multidomain gene in another organism. We have previously generated the links according to each of these methods individually for 43 known microbial genomes. Here we combine these results to construct networks of functional associations.
We show that the functional networks obtained by applying these methods have different topologies and that the information they provide is largely additive. In particular, the combined networks of functional links contain an average of 57% of an organism's complete genetic complement, uncover substantial portions of known pathways, and suggest the function of previously unannotated genes. In addition, the combined networks are qualitatively different from the networks obtained using individual methods. They have a dominant cluster that contains approximately 80%-90% of the genes, independent of genome size, and the dominant clusters show the small world behavior expected of a biological system, with global connectivity that is nearly random, and local properties that are highly ordered.
When the information on functional linkage provided by three emerging computational methods is combined, the integrated network uncovers large numbers of conserved pathways and identifies clusters of functionally related genes. It therefore shows considerable utility and promise as a tool for understanding genomic structure, and for guiding high throughput experimental investigations.
- Additional Data File
- Cluster Coefficient
- Random Network
- Functional Link
- Phylogenetic Profile
Complex systems, ubiquitous in science, owe their complexity to the interrelatedness of their elements . Investigations of the local and global structures of network representations of these systems have advanced our understanding of the systems themselves as well as some of their emergent, system-level properties [2,3]. A network of interactions also relates genes of a cell as each gene product carries out its function in the context of other gene products. Thanks to the availability of complete genomic sequences, the elements of cellular networks - the gene products - have been identified. Methods for identifying functional relationships between genes have also been introduced. We now have the opportunity to get a glimpse of the structure of the networks that lie at the core of life at the cellular level.
Previously, we reported on a database of functional links generated by the comparative genomics methods . Here we combine the total sets of links generated by these three methods for each of 43 microbial genomes with the following findings.
Sets of functional links provided by the three methods are largely additive (that is, the sets largely do not overlap). The reliability of the links is approximately 70%, well above the background noise, which is estimated to be in the 10-15% range. Networks obtained by individual methods coalesce into a combined network covering, on average, 57% of an organisms' genes. The local structures of the combined networks correspond to genes participating in the same pathway. In the Escherichia coli network, 26 clusters are identified such that each is composed of seven or more genes and corresponds to different functional pathways. Functional predictions can be made based upon a gene's location in the combined networks. For example, Methanococcus jannaschii genes MJ1313 and MJ1407 are of completely unknown function, but are unambiguously predicted to be related, and therefore should be studied together. A giant cluster covering between 80 to 90% of the genes of the total network and demonstrating random global properties and highly cliquish local properties characterizes the structure of the combined networks.
Networks from individual comparative genomic methods
The relationships uncovered by each method form networks whose structures are method-dependent (Figure 1a). Phylogenetic profile links, which we will refer to as 'phylo links', are transitive; that is, two genes linked to a common gene are also linked to each other. An example is the fully connected clique formed by flagella motor proteins (also shown in Pelligrini et al. ); that is, the proteins are generally either all present or all absent in a given genome and therefore have identical phylogenetic patterns. Phylo networks are characterized by the number and size distribution of their cliques. The occurrence of fully connected cliques follows from the definition that requires perfectly correlated patterns of occurrence to assign a link. A more permissive phylogenetic profiling method would result in reduced transitivity.
Gene networks uncovered by conserved chromosomal proximity links, which we will refer to as 'chromo links', typically exhibit a chain structure. For example, one of the long chains in the network of Helicobacter pylori genes (Figure 1b) corresponds to the chromosomal region containing highly conserved ribosomal genes. This network formation results from the fact that the conservation of gene order tends to involve more than two genes. As a particular conserved group tends to be arranged in an order conserved among organisms, linear concatenation dominates the network.
The domain fusion links, which we will refer to as 'fusion links', have complicated network relations, including the appearance of a major cluster. Even for small networks, as in Figure 1c, we find a few nodes that have a large number of links, and a large number that have few links [25,26,27]. We discuss this power-law behavior below.
In summary, the three methods for constructing networks all produce distinctive, non-random structures: branched but highly cliquish for phylo networks; generally branched structures for fusion networks; and linearly concatenated structures for chromo networks. By combining these three representations on the same grid of genes, we generate a largely non-overlapping map of functional linkages that provides more information than any of the three maps alone. The combined networks have a number of important functional and structural properties.
Functional properties of the combined comparative genomics networks
Overlap of nodes and edges between the four types of network
A fundamental question is the quality of the links in terms of a direct functional correlation between the linked members. This quality can be estimated by reference to databases that classify genes into broad functional categories (clusters of orthologous groups (COGs) ) or biological pathways (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) ). In particular, 72%, 68% and 64% of the fusion, chromo and phylo links are in the same COGs functional category, respectively [19,22,24].
We find, as did Marcotte et al. , that the links corroborated by multiple methods are of exceedingly good quality. However, as discussed above, this intersecting set corresponds to a small fraction of the total links (approximately 10%). Thus, in our study of combined networks, we construct the union, instead of the intersection, of the links generated by each method.
As can be gleaned from Figure 4a, seven of the genes involved in ATP synthase (HP1131 to HP1137) form a conserved cluster of genes (detected in almost all known bacterial genomes). The chromo links among HP0828, HP1212 and HP1137:HP1136 (the last two are paralogs), are based on conserved proximity in other genomes. Six of the genes also have identical phylogenetic profiles, and the profile is unique to these six genes. The link between genes HP1135 and HP1137:HP1136 is strengthened because it is established by both chromosomal proximity and fusion in two Mycobacterium genomes. The five (of six) H. pylori genes that form the cytochrome bc and c complexes are linked. Essentially, the string of links is based upon two separate chromosomal sections: HP0144, HP0145 and HP0147; and HP1539 and HP1540. Within these two sections, two links are further strengthened by phylo links. The two sections are linked by a fusion link between two of the genes (HP1539 and HP0147). Three genes (HP0191, HP0192 and HP0193) compose the fumarate reductase complex and are connected by two chromo links. Chromosomal links build a skeleton of links that unite all the genes involved in NADH dehydrogenase. This cluster is further supported, however, by numerous phylo and fusion links. Two links are supported by all three methods. Two genes, HP1010 and HP1420, involved in oxidative phosphorylation are not connected to other genes involved in this functional system.
Figure 4b shows the functional links among the H. pylori genes involved in phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesis. Genes HP0402, HP0403 and HP0774 correspond to tRNA synthetase domains of phenylalanine and tyrosine linked by fusion events elsewhere as well as the proximity between HP0402 and HP0403 (HP0402 corresponds to two nodes, one for each of its domains, see Materials and methods). HP1249, HP1277, HP0663 and HP0401 share the same phylogenetic profile. HP0401, HP1249, HP0157 and HP0283 are found fused together as the yeast Ar01 gene and are thus all fusion linked. The proximity of HP1277 and HP1278, tryptophan synthase α and β chain respectively, is conserved in other genomes. These two genes are also found fused together in some genomes. The relationship between HP1279 (represented twice for each of its domains), HP1281 and HP1282 is enforced by phylo, chromo and fusion links for each pair of the three genes, with the exception of a lack of a fusion link between HP1279 and HP1282. HP0154 and HP0672 are present in the network but are not linked to other genes known to act in this pathway.
New functional information on particular genes can be predicted on the basis of the combined networks. Naturally, the most fundamental unit of prediction in the network corresponds to a link between two nodes. For example, M. jannaschii genes MJ1313 and MJ1407, whose functions are completely uncharacterized, are linked by fusion, chromo and phylo links. From this superlink we can confidently conclude that, although the actual functions of the genes in question remain elusive, a functional link probably exists between the two genes and they need to be experimentally studied together.
Structural properties of the combined comparative genomics networks
In general, many paths of different lengths connect each pair of nodes in the giant cluster. A useful measure of the global characteristics of the cluster is the minimum path length between each pair of nodes. It seems intuitively plausible that such minimum paths are the most biologically relevant of all paths connecting a pair. For each genome, the set of shortest path lengths has a Gaussian distribution. Its average is referred to as the characteristic path length. The characteristic path length averaged over the 43 genomes that have a giant cluster is 7, and the standard deviation about this average is 3. In other words, on average, seven comparative genomic links separate any two genes in a giant cluster. This is in contrast to a characteristic path distance of 5 ± 1 for random networks simulated with the same number of nodes and edges. Thus, the characteristic path distances of the combined networks are slightly larger than those of random networks but much smaller than the characteristic path of uniform lattice networks.
Although global properties appear to be nearly random, local properties are not. In particular we expect local properties to be structured as each biological pathway that subserves a particular function invariably has several members, and the relationships between these members are likely to emerge through the comparative genomics methods applied here. One descriptive characteristic of a local environment is the clustering coefficient: the average probability that two genes linked to a common gene are also linked to each other . This number is 1 for systems that are fully transitive (for example, networks constructed using phylogenetic profiling as applied here; see Figure 1) and becomes very small for random networks.
Not surprisingly, the combined networks for all 43 genomes show a significant amount of local clustering - or 'cliquishness' - when compared to random graphs. The chromosomal proximity and fusion networks both have a similar clustering coefficient of 0.24 and 0.25 respectively, as calculated for the giant component of the networks. When shuffling the networks (see Materials and methods) the clustering coefficients for these random graphs are 0.02 and 0.06 for chromo and fusion networks, respectively. The clustering coefficient increases to 0.36 for the combined network (0.02 for the shuffled networks), reflecting the high coefficient of the fully transitive phylogenetic graphs. The combination of high clustering coefficients and random-like characteristic path distance places these biological networks among the well studied class of so-called 'small-world' networks, to which social nets often conform [2,31].
Quantitative measures of the local (clustering coefficient) and global (characteristic path distance) properties of networks allow us to analyze the similarities and differences among all of the networks. Figure 7c shows the properties of the network mapped onto a two-dimensional space defined by the characteristic path distance and clustering coefficient. We find that networks of the same type (phylo, chromo, fusion or combined) cluster together, demonstrating the universality of network structures of each method. The combined networks have a characteristic path that is roughly the average of the fusion and chromo networks and a clustering coefficient that is greater than both.
Furthermore, the networks appear to be scale-free in terms of the number of links per node (degree): a few nodes have many connections while most have few connections. As shown in Figure 7d, the distribution of links per node for the chromo, fusion and combined networks differs markedly from those of random graphs with the same number of nodes and edges (Figure 7d). While the power law distribution (linear regression on a log-log scale) holds well for the fusion and phylo graphs, the number of nodes of degree 1 in the chromo graph is less than would be expected from a power law, and is, indeed, not significantly larger than those of degree 2. The explanation lies in the operon organization of genes on bacterial and archaeal chromosomes, making two the typical number of chromo links of a conserved proximity of a gene with other genes - one on each end (see also chromo links in Figures 1 and 2).
We stress that the comparative genomic links do not necessarily correspond to direct protein-protein interactions, and thus are not expected to be detected by yeast two-hybrid methods. Links made in silico have been shown to be indicative of broader functional relationships [19,22]. In a recent study, Rain et al. identified over 1,200 interactions using a high-throughput application of the yeast two-hybrid method using approximately 15% of the H. pylori genes as 'baits' . Of the 1,200 interacting pairs detected, only 17 correspond to links also found in our comparative genomic network. We note that low overlap between sets of links is even observed between high-throughput datasets [33,34] and may be explained by a lack of saturation of the complete functional relationship space, a high false-positive rate, and/or a bias towards a certain type of link .
Uncovering functional links between genes is a major step towards deducing the function of individual genes. Here we describe the properties of networks generated by the combination of three comparative genomics methods for 43 microbial genomes representing the three domains of life. We find that a giant 'small-world' cluster consistently includes 80% to 90% of the nodes in these networks, so that the average minimum path between any two genes is small, but local cliquishness is frequent relative to random networks. This structure for a society of genes, along with the observation that local order corresponds to genes of the same functional pathways, supports the notion that the network of relationships among a cell's genes is a set of highly cliquish functional systems interlinked by genes that are common to multiple pathways.
Identification of comparative genomics links
We used three previously published methods for detecting functional links between proteins by comparative genomics. In this section we describe the implementation of these methods. As a pair of proteins can be coded as distinct genes in some genomes but fused as a multidomain protein in others (the basis for the fusion method), a comparative genomics study must adopt protein domains (instead of whole proteins) as the unit of analysis. Thus, multidomained proteins are split into domains (as they are at present in the COGs database, which clusters orthologous protein domains that are present in three or more lineages) and these, in turn, form the units of the comparative genomics links generated by the three methods. All the links are available in the Predictome database  and as additional data files (see Additional data files). These methods all depend upon detecting orthologs across genomes and, consequently, each node in any network corresponds to a cluster of orthologous groups [12,37] - a COG - with a representative sequence in that genome. Thus, the term 'gene' which, for brevity, is used throughout as indicative of a single node in the network, may in some cases be represented by multiple nodes.
Domain fusion links
Fusion links between protein domains were detected by a BLASTP  search of the 43 genomes included in the COGs database against nrdb90 , a non-redundant protein database. We deemed two protein domains - assigned to different COGs - to be fusion linked if each had an alignment of at least 80 residues to the same nrdb90 protein with a maximum expectation (E) value of 10-10 and with a maximum overlap of the two alignments of 20 residues. We then extrapolated the link between the domains to a link between their respective ortholog families (COGs) by applying the link to the common representatives of the two sets; that is, each member of the first COG is linked to those members of its partner COG that are of the same genome. This final step assigns links to domains that were undetected as the result of the high-stringency cutoff, and it therefore greatly increases the number of links. The COGs database is threshold-free and is instead build upon clusters of bidirectional best intergenomic matches . Thus, the availability of this reliable ortholog family's database allows for the generalization of a fusion link from the level of domains to domain families while minimizing the possibility of false-positive alignments between the domains and their fusion.
Chromosomal proximity links
Chromo links were identified as recently described . Genes A and B in genome X are linked by a chromosomal proximity link if they satisfy either of the two following conditions. They have a direct link, in which A and B are proximate (within 300 bp and transcribed in the same direction ) in X and their orthologs are also proximate in at least two other genomes corresponding to different phylogenetic groups (as defined by COGs). Or, they have an inferred link, in which A and B are not proximate in X but their orthologs are proximate in at least three other genomes corresponding to different phyletic groups.
Phylogenetic profiling links
The 43 organisms are organized into 26 phyletic groups as defined by the COGs database. Two ortholog groups (COGs) are phylo linked if their phyletic distributions are identical (zero bit difference in ); that is, their 26-bit profiles of presence and absence are the same. Finally, two domains are phylo linked if their respective COGs are linked. The reliability of a phylo link is inversely related to how frequently the linked patterns are observed (data not shown). Thus, setting a lower threshold for the number of ortholog families that can have the same phyletic pattern can increase the quality of the links. However, a lower threshold, by definition, reduces the number of links. To strike a balance between the number of links and their functional correlation, a threshold of 29 was used. In other words, if a particular phyletic pattern corresponds to more than 29 orthologous groups, the pattern is considered uninformative for phylogenetic links.
Functional annotation of the networks
Functional correlation of the sets
To determine the functional correlation of a given network, observed (phylo, chromo, fusion or combined) or shuffled, with the classification of a given database (COGs or KEGG) we begin by collapsing the network to a list of links and selecting those links where both members are annotated (broad functional category in COGs  or pathway in KEGG ). The correlation of the network with the functional annotation is taken as the percentage of links in this set that is in the same category or pathway.
All pathway information used to investigate local network structures was derived from the KEGG database .
Two different methods for generating random networks were used. Both methods compare random networks with observed networks having the same number of nodes and edges.
Shuffling of existing network
To preserve the unique degree distribution of the observed network in its random counterpart, we shuffled the edges of the observed network according to the following algorithm . We begin with the observed network and repeatedly (10,000 times) randomly choose two links in the observed network, x1<>y1 and x2<>y2, and rewire them to: x1<>y2 and x2<>y1.
De novo synthesis of random network
When analyzing the degree distribution of the observed networks, random networks are required to have the same number of nodes and edges as the observed networks but have a randomly generated degree distribution. We begin with N unlinked nodes and proceed by randomly choosing two nodes and adding an edge between them unless it already exists. The simulation ends when there are E edges in the random graph.
All the network files are available as additional data files , along with a text file description of the COG clusters (COGs), and instructions for interpreting the network files. The networks are organized according to type and genome. The 172 network files correspond to four networks (chromo, phylo, fusion and composite) for each of 43 genomes. Each network file lists the edges of the network. In the composite files there is an additional column to specify the nature of the link: 1, fusion; 2, chromo; 3, phylo; 4, chromo + fusion; 5, phylo + fusion; 6, chromo + phylo; 7, fusion + chromo + phylo.
We thank Adnan Derti, Ron Ophir, Carlos J. Camacho, Daniel Segré and Todd Silverstein for critical readings and helpful discussions. We thank Ivy Lee for work on an early stage of this study. This work was funded by a Whitaker Graduate Fellowship and by a Koshland Postdoctoral Fellowship to I.Y.
- Bar-Yam Y: Dynamics of Complex Systems. 1997, London: Addison Wesley LongmanGoogle Scholar
- Watts DJ, Strogatz SH: Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature. 1998, 393: 440-442. 10.1038/30918.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barabasi AL, Albert R: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science. 1999, 286: 509-512. 10.1126/science.286.5439.509.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Uetz P, Giot L, Cagney G, Mansfield TA, Judson RS, Knight JR, Lockshon D, Narayan V, Srinivasan M, Pochart P, et al: A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 2000, 403: 623-627. 10.1038/35001009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ito T, Chiba T, Ozawa R, Yoshida M, Hattori M, Sakaki Y: A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 4569-4574. 10.1073/pnas.061034498.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gavin AC, Bosche M, Krause R, Grandi P, Marzioch M, Bauer A, Schultz J, Rick JM, Michon AM, Cruciat CM, et al: Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature. 2002, 415: 141-147. 10.1038/415141a.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ho Y, Gruhler A, Heilbut A, Bader GD, Moore L, Adams SL, Millar A, Taylor P, Bennett K, Boutilier K, et al: Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature. 2002, 415: 180-183. 10.1038/415180a.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Galperin MY, Koonin EV: Who's your neighbor? New computational approaches for functional genomics. Nat Biotechnol. 2000, 18: 609-613. 10.1038/76443.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huynen M, Snel B, Lathe W, Bork P: Exploitation of gene context. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2000, 10: 366-370. 10.1016/S0959-440X(00)00098-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Eisenberg D, Marcotte EM, Xenarios I, Yeates TO: Protein function in the post-genomic era. Nature. 2000, 405: 823-836. 10.1038/35015694.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marcotte EM: Computational genetics: finding protein function by nonhomology methods. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2000, 10: 359-365. 10.1016/S0959-440X(00)00097-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ: A genomic perspective on protein families. Science. 1997, 278: 631-637. 10.1126/science.278.5338.631.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gaasterland T, Ragan MA: Constructing multigenome views of whole microbial genomes. Microb Comp Genomics. 1998, 3: 177-192.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pellegrini M, Marcotte EM, Thompson MJ, Eisenberg D, Yeates TO: Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogenetic profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96: 4285-4288. 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4285.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lawrence JG: Selfish operons and speciation by gene transfer. Trends Microbiol. 1997, 5: 355-359. 10.1016/S0966-842X(97)01110-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Overbeek R, Fonstein M, D'Souza M, Pusch GD, Maltsev N: The use of gene clusters to infer functional coupling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96: 2896-2901. 10.1073/pnas.96.6.2896.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dandekar T, Snel B, Huynen M, Bork P: Conservation of gene order: a fingerprint of proteins that physically interact. Trends Biochem Sci. 1998, 23: 324-328. 10.1016/S0968-0004(98)01274-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fujibuchi W, Ogata H, Matsuda H, Kanehisa M: Automatic detection of conserved gene clusters in multiple genomes by graph comparison and P-quasi grouping. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28: 4029-4036. 10.1093/nar/28.20.4029.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yanai I, Mellor JC, DeLisi C: Identifying functional links between genes using conserved chromosomal proximity. Trends Genet. 2002, 18: 176-179. 10.1016/S0168-9525(01)02621-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marcotte EM, Pellegrini M, Ng HL, Rice DW, Yeates TO, Eisenberg D: Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. Science. 1999, 285: 751-753. 10.1126/science.285.5428.751.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Enright AJ, Iliopoulos I, Kyrpides NC, Ouzounis CA: Protein interaction maps for complete genomes based on gene fusion events. Nature. 1999, 402: 86-90.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yanai I, Derti A, DeLisi C: Genes linked by fusion events are generally of the same functional category: a systematic analysis of 30 microbial genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 7940-7945. 10.1073/pnas.141236298.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Enright AJ, Ouzounis CA: Functional associations of proteins in entire genomes by means of exhaustive detection of gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2001, 2: 1-0034. 10.1186/gb-2001-2-9-research0034.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mellor JC, Yanai I, Clodfelter KH, Mintseris J, DeLisi C: Predictome: a database of putative functional links between proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30: 306-309. 10.1093/nar/30.1.306.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wuchty S: Scale-free behavior in protein domain networks. Mol Biol Evol. 2001, 18: 1694-1702.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Apic G, Gough J, Teichmann SA: Domain combinations in archaeal, eubacterial and eukaryotic proteomes. J Mol Biol. 2001, 310: 311-325. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4776.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Apic G, Gough J, Teichmann SA: An insight into domain combinations. Bioinformatics. 2001, 17: S83-S89. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.1.83.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huynen M, Snel B, Lathe W, Bork P: Predicting protein function by genomic context: quantitative evaluation and qualitative inferences. Genome Res. 2000, 10: 1204-1210. 10.1101/gr.10.8.1204.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marcotte EM, Pellegrini M, Thompson MJ, Yeates TO, Eisenberg D: A combined algorithm for genome-wide prediction of protein function. Nature. 1999, 402: 83-86. 10.1038/47048.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Snel B, Bork P, Huynen MA: The identification of functional modules from the genomic association of genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 5890-5895. 10.1073/pnas.092632599.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Amaral LA, Scala A, Barthelemy M, Stanley HE: Classes of small-world networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 11149-11152. 10.1073/pnas.200327197.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rain JC, Selig L, De Reuse H, Battaglia V, Reverdy C, Simon S, Lenzen G, Petel F, Wojcik J, Schachter V, et al: The protein-protein interaction map of Helicobacter pylori. Nature. 2001, 409: 211-215. 10.1038/35051615.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hazbun TR, Fields S: Networking proteins in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 4277-42778. 10.1073/pnas.091096398.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tucker CL, Gera JF, Uetz P: Towards an understanding of complex protein networks. Trends Cell Biol. 2001, 11: 102-106. 10.1016/S0962-8924(00)01902-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- von Mering C, Krause R, Snel B, Cornell M, Oliver SG, Fields S, Bork P: Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature. 2002, 417: 399-403. 10.1038/nature750.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Predictome. [http://predictome.bu.edu]
- Tatusov RL, Natale DA, Garkavtsev IV, Tatusova TA, Shankavaram UT, Rao BS, Kiryutin B, Galperin MY, Fedorova ND, Koonin EV: The COG database: new developments in phylogenetic classification of proteins from complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29: 22-28. 10.1093/nar/29.1.22.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 3389-3402. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Holm L, Sander C: Removing near-neighbour redundancy from large protein sequence collections. Bioinformatics. 1998, 14: 423-429. 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.5.423.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kanehisa M, Goto S: KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28: 27-30. 10.1093/nar/28.1.27.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Newman ME, Strogatz SH, Watts DJ: Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics. 2001, 64: 026118-10.1103/PhysRevE.64.026118.Google Scholar
- Pajek: package for large network analysis. [http://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/pajek/]