Skip to main content
  • Author Correction
  • Open access
  • Published:

Author Correction: The shaky foundations of simulating single-cell RNA sequencing data

The Original Article was published on 29 March 2023

Correction: Genome Biol 24, 62 (2023)

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-023-02904-1


Following publication of the original article [1], it was pointed out that the legend to Table 1 did not match the content of the table.

The incorrect Table 1 is as follows:

Table 1 Overview of scRNA-seq simulators compared in this study. Methods are ordered alphabetically and annotated according to their (in)ability to accommodate multiple batches and/or clusters, support for parallelization (parameter estimation and data simulation, respectively), software availability, and publication year. The right-most column catalogues neutral benchmark studies where each simulator was used. ( = yes, ✘ = no, () = yes, but based on user input parameters, i.e., no support for parameter estimation, *requires random splitting of cells into two groups, †/‡ = internal/prior resampling from empirical parameter distribution,  = no separate estimation step)

The corrected Table 1 is as follows:

Table 1 Overview of scRNA-seq simulators compared in this study. Methods are ordered alphabetically and annotated according to their (in)ability to accommodate multiple batches and/or clusters, support for parallelization (parameter estimation and data simulation, respectively), software availability, and publication year. ‘Type(s)’ column specifies which type of simulations can be produced (n: “singular” references: single batch or cluster; b: multiple batches; k: multiple clusters). ‘Cell #’ refers to whether the number of cells can be varied. Symbols:  = yes, ✘ = no, () = yes, but based on user input parameters, i.e., no support for parameter estimation, *requires random splitting of cells into two groups, †/‡ = internal/prior resampling from empirical parameter distribution,  = no separate estimation step)

The linked citations and the hyperlinks to the availability of data (in table 1) can be found in the original article. The original article [1] has been corrected.

Reference

  1. Crowell HL, Morillo Leonardo SX, Soneson C, et al. The shaky foundations of simulating single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 2023;24:62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-023-02904-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark D. Robinson.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Crowell, H.L., Leonardo, S.X.M., Soneson, C. et al. Author Correction: The shaky foundations of simulating single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol 25, 178 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-024-03329-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-024-03329-0