Skip to main content
Download PDF

Conditional knockdown of OsMLH1 to improve plant prime editing systems without disturbing fertility in rice

Genome Biology volume 25, Article number: 131 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

High-efficiency prime editing (PE) is desirable for precise genome manipulation. The activity of mammalian PE systems can be largely improved by inhibiting DNA mismatch repair by coexpressing a dominant-negative variant of MLH1. However, this strategy has not been widely used for PE optimization in plants, possibly because of its less conspicuous effects and inconsistent performance at different sites.

Results

We show that direct RNAi knockdown of OsMLH1 in an ePE5c system increases the efficiency of our most recently updated PE tool by 1.30- to 2.11-fold in stably transformed rice cells, resulting in as many as 85.42% homozygous mutants in the T0 generation. The high specificity of ePE5c is revealed by whole-genome sequencing. To overcome the partial sterility induced by OsMLH1 knockdown of ePE5c, a conditional excision system is introduced to remove the RNAi module by Cre-mediated site-specific recombination. Using a simple approach of enriching excision events, we generate 100% RNAi module-free plants in the T0 generation. The increase in efficiency due to OsMLH1 knockdown is maintained in the excised plants, whose fertility is not impaired.

Conclusions

This study provides a safe and reliable plant PE optimization strategy for improving editing efficiency without disturbing plant development via transient MMR inhibition with an excisable RNAi module of MLH1.

Background

Over the past decade, the adoption of gene editing technology from prokaryotic CRISPR–Cas systems has greatly changed patterns of plant research. Engineered CRISPR systems have rapidly produced mutants, primarily those obtained by knocking out desired genes in numerous plant species. Because many valuable agricultural traits are associated with specific single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) or short variations, precise genome editing technologies for effectively manipulating nucleotide substitutions, deletions, and insertions are greatly needed [1]. Homology-directed repair (HDR) via CRISPR-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) enables precise editing of the genome by introducing defined changes in an exogenous donor template. However, the efficiency of precise plant genome editing through HDR is limited due to the extremely low intrinsic activity and delivery barriers associated with donor molecules [1]. To address this problem, several approaches, such as employing high amounts of donors provided by geminiviral replicon systems or transcript template systems to secure recombination events in rice [2, 3], sequentially delivering single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) and donors in germline-specific Cas9-expressing Arabidopsis lines [4], enriching donor-released events via the inducible Cas9 system in maize [5], and bombarding chemically modified donor DNA using tandem repeat HDR technology [6], have been exploited. Although these strategies have increased editing efficiency, methods relying on HDR are still plagued by intricated procedures and exhibit highly variable performance at different genomic loci [7].

Recently developed prime editing (PE) technology has revolutionized precise genome engineering by bypassing the need for HDR machinery [8]. A prime-editing guide RNA (pegRNA) directs a prime editor to nick the non-target strand (NTS) with a Cas9 H840A nickase in the fusion. The exposed 3′ flap hybridizes with the primer binding site (PBS) sequence of the pegRNA, which allows the reverse transcriptase (RT) of the editor to synthesize new single-strand DNA following the customized RT template (RTT). The 3′ flap extension displaces the adjacent genomic sequence through endonuclease excision on the unedited 5′ flap sequence. The heteroduplex intermediate of the 3′ flap strand and the target strand (TS) is resolved by a mismatch repair (MMR) system to install edits [9, 10]. However, the nicked edited strand is prone to excise by MMR and correct following the unedited TS. In mammalian cells, CRISPRi screening of DNA repair-related genes revealed that several MMR components, such as MLH1, MSH2, MSH3, MSH6, and PMS2, are involved in the regulation of PE efficiency [9, 10]. To manipulate MMR activity during editing, a dominant-negative MLH1 (MLH1dn) protein was coexpressed with PE2/PE3 systems. The average editing efficiency of the resulting PE4/PE5 systems increased 2.8- to 7.7-fold in a variety of cell types [9].

PE has been exploited to obtain desired mutations in monocots and dicots [11]. Although plant prime editors have been vastly optimized for installing base substitutions and small insertions and deletions (indels) [12], their applications remain restricted due to the relatively low efficiency in many scenarios. The strategy of MMR suppression has also been attempted in plant PE engineering. For instance, compared with ePE3max, ePE5max expressing a dominant-negative variant of rice MLH1 (OsMLH1dn) or maize MLH1dn (ZmMLH1dn) increased the proportion of homozygous mutations in stable transgenic lines [13, 14]. However, ePE5max using OsMLH1dn exhibited comparable but not significantly enhanced efficiency compared with ePE3max in protoplasts, and the same finding was obtained for the overall mutation efficiency in transgenic rice [13]. Similarly, our former study revealed that the fusion of human MLH1dn (hMLH1dn) in the pPE2max system did not outperform the original version in calli [15]. These findings suggest that the suppression of MMR activity via the use of dominant-negative MLH1 variants may be less effective in improving the activity of prime editors in plants than in mammals. In this study, we showed that direct knockdown of OsMLH1 robustly enhanced rice PE efficiency.

Results

ePE3 was not obviously enhanced by the coexpression of MLH1dn orthologs

To test whether dominant-negative variants of MLH1 can enhance the editing activity of our recently developed ePE2 system [16], hMLH1dn and OsMLH1dn were fused to the C-terminus of ePE2 with a porcine teschovirus-1 2A (P2A) self-cleaving peptide to construct ePE2-hMLH1dn and ePE2-OsMLH1dn, respectively (Fig. 1a). Then, pegRNAs were designed to induce precise mutations at six targets in the rice genome. The PE3 or PE5 strategy was applied to increase the efficiency of expressing additional sgRNAs to nick the non-edited strand. After Agrobacterium-mediated rice transformation, the efficiencies of ePE5a (with the ePE2-hMLH1dn editor) and ePE5b (with the ePE2-OsMLH1dn editor) were determined by next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the target-specific amplicons in transgenic calli. Similar to previous observations of MLH1dn-engineered pPE3max in protoplasts and pPE2max in calli [13, 15], no significant increase in editing efficiency was obtained with ePE5a or ePE5b compared with that obtained with ePE3 (P > 0.05; Fig. 1b). Moreover, the efficiency of ePE5b was 52.81% of that of ePE3 at the NRT1.1-T site (P < 0.05), suggesting that inappropriate expression of OsMLH1dn might hinder editing at certain targets.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Prime editing of engineered PE systems in rice calli. a Diagram of the PE systems. Left, structure of the engineered editors. nCas9, H840A nickase of the SpCas9-R221K/N394K variant; NC-MMLVΔRNaseH, fusion of the viral NC protein and the RNase H domain-truncated version of the evolved Moloney murine leukemia virus RT mutant (D200N/L603W/T330P/T306K/W313F); ZmUBI pro, maize ubiquitin 1 promoter; 35S-Ter, CaMV 35S terminator; NOS-Ter, NOS terminator; P2A, porcine teschovirus-1 2A self-cleavage peptide. Right, cassette of PE RNAs. OsU3 Pro, rice U3 promoter for nicking sgRNA expression; U6-com, the pol II promoter enhanced the U6 promoter for pegRNA expression; PolyT-Ter, poly T terminator; Hsp-Ter, terminator of Hsp18.2. b Efficiency of precise editing in stably transformed calli. The mutation and the position relative to the cleavage point of nCas9, as well as the nicking sgRNA site, are shown. Approximately 200 newly emerged calli after 2 to 3 weeks of selection were collected for amplicon NGS. The efficiencies were calculated from the ratios of edited reads to total clean reads. Three independent transformants were evaluated from different Agrobacterium clones of a vector as biological replicates to generate mean values and standard deviations. One-way ANOVA was used to determine the significance of the differences between the PE systems. *P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. c Relative expression levels of OsMLH1 in calli of ePE3 and ePE5c. The abundance of the OsMLH1 transcript in independent resistance events was determined by qRT–PCR analysis. The mean values of three technical replicates are shown as dots inside the violin plot (n = 20). The differences were assessed by paired t tests. **P < 0.01

Full size image

The PE efficiency was improved by RNAi suppression of OsMLH1

In the K562 cell line, the knockdown of MLH1 or other MutSα–MutLα genes via CRISPRi technology increased PE efficiency [9]. Given that the CRISPRi system has not been well established in plants [17], an intron-containing hairpin RNA (ihpRNA) against OsMLH1 (OsMLH1-ihpRNA) was constructed for RNA interference (RNAi) of the transcript (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). The expression cassette of OsMLH1-ihpRNA was integrated into the ePE3 system, yielding ePE5c (Fig. 1a). RNAi suppression was examined by quantitative reverse transcription–PCR (qRT–PCR) assays of independent ePE3 and ePE5c events in stably transformed calli. For the constructs with different pegRNAs, the average OsMLH1-knockdown efficiency of ePE5c ranged from 67.32 to 82.68% (Fig. 1c). Statistical analysis confirmed that the transcript abundance of OsMLH1 was significantly lower in ePE5c cells than in ePE3 cells (P < 0.05).

Subsequently, the editing efficiencies in calli were determined using amplicon NGS. We found that ePE5c had the highest efficiency among the four PE systems at all tested targets, and the ratios of the precise edits obtained with ePE5c ranged from 18.71 to 70.32% (Fig. 1b). Unlike ePE5a and ePE5b, ePE5c exhibited improved efficiency compared with ePE3, with significant increases of 1.30-fold for a C-to-A mutation at the D2-T site, 1.56-fold for a T-to-G mutation at the MPK3-T site, 2.11-fold for a G deletion at the NRT1.1-T site, 1.39-fold for a T insertion at the Pid3-T site, 2.00-fold for a T-to-A mutation at the SLR1-T site, and 1.39-fold for a C insertion at the WRKY32-T site (P < 0.05). Averaging the data from the six targets, ePE5c precisely installed mutations in 40.52% of the reads, resulting in 1.51-, 1.57-, and 1.52-fold increases compared with the results obtained with ePE3, ePE5a, and ePE5b, respectively. Undesired indels are the majority of byproducts of PE3/PE5 systems. The NGS data showed that ePE5c and ePE3 yielded similar frequencies of byproduct indels at four targets (Additional file 1: Fig. S2), whereas the byproduct indel frequencies obtained with ePE5c at MPK3-T and SLR1-T were significantly lower than those obtained with ePE3 (P < 0.01). Therefore, the byproduct editing of ePE5c was not synchronously boosted with intended editing. Taken together, these results indicated that rice PE efficiency can be robustly enhanced via RNAi-mediated suppression of OsMLH1.

Editing in T0 plants is enhanced by OsMLH1 suppression

To comprehensively evaluate the editing activity, independent T0 transgenic rice plants were regenerated. The OsMLH1 levels in the ePE5c lines were compared with those in the ePE3 lines via qRT–PCR. Consistent with the findings in calli, the OsMLH1 abundance in ePE5c plants was significantly lower than that in ePE3 plants (Fig. 2a , P < 0.05). The average OsMLH1 expression in the ePE5c lines was 16.16% to 30.53% of that in the ePE3 lines. At certain targets, e.g., MPK3-T and WRKY32-T, the transcripts of OsMLH1 in almost half of the ePE5c plants were virtually eliminated to less than 20% of those in ePE3 plants (Additional file 1: Fig. S3), confirming the effectiveness of RNAi inhibition.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Prime editing of ePE3 and ePE5c in transgenic rice plants. a Relative expression levels of OsMLH1 in T0 plants. The mean values and standard deviations of the qRT–PCR data were obtained from randomly selected independent lines with either the ePE3 (n = 4) or ePE5c (n = 12) vector. The differences were assessed by an independent t test. **P < 0.01. b Editing of the six targets in the T0 lines. For each vector, the target mutations were identified in 48 lines by the Hi-TOM assay. The ratio of plants harboring undesired indels to total plants is indicated in purple. The precise homozygous mutants are labeled in red, and the remaining plants harboring targeted mutations (non-homozygous edits, including heterozygous and chimeric edits) are labeled in blue. c, d Comparison of gross morphology and panicles of the ePE3 and ePE5c lines. Representative T0 lines harboring homozygous mutations in the WRKY32-T site (c) or their main panicle (d) are indicated at the yellow ripening stage. Scale bars = 10 cm (c) or 2 cm (d). e Statistical analysis of the seed-setting rates of the ePE3 and ePE5c lines. In an independent line, the seed-setting rate was averaged from at least three panicles. The T0 lines harboring homozygous mutations at the MPK3-T and WRKY32-T sites were randomly selected to generate means ± SDs (n = 24). The differences were assessed by paired t tests. **P < 0.01

Full size image

Next, precise edits in T0 plants were identified via an NGS-based high-throughput tracking of mutations (Hi-TOM) assay [18]. We found that the ePE5c lines had greater or similar frequencies of mutant at the targets, which was consistent with the results obtained from calli (Table 1, Fig. 2b). Detailed analysis revealed that, on average, 87.15% of the regenerated plants were edited by ePE5c, while 71.53% were edited by ePE3. Importantly, the frequency of plants harboring homozygous edits increased from 41.67% for ePE3 to 62.50% for ePE5c at D2-T, from 6.25% to 29.17% at MPK3-T, from 0 to 31.25% at NRT1.1-T, from 4.17% to 16.67% at Pid3-T, from 35.42% to 66.67% at SLR1-T, and from 56.25% to 85.42% at WRKY32-T (Table 1, Fig. 2b), showing obvious increases in the frequency of homozygous mutants resulting from the suppression of OsMLH1. In addition, the frequency of ePE5c plants harboring indels was comparable to that of ePE3 plants. These results suggest that ePE5c is superior to ePE3 for conducting precise editing in rice.

Table 1 Prime editing of ePE3 and ePE5c in T0 transgenic plants
Full size table

Genome-wide analysis of the off-target effects of ePE5c in rice

High specificity of PE2 and PE3 has been observed in cell lines and plants [19,20,21]. We wondered whether the off-target effects of ePE5 would increase as a result of the improvement in efficiency. To this end, T0 transgenic plants harboring ePE3 and ePE5c constructs targeting D2-T, MPK3-T, and WRKY32-T were selected after 5 weeks of rooting and analyzed via whole-genome sequencing (WGS). For ePE3 or ePE5c, nine homozygous mutants consisting of three independent lines of each pegRNA were sequenced at an approximate 50 × depth. Six plants transformed with the SpCas9 vector were sequenced as controls, and six untransformed wild-type (WT) rice plants were used to filter the background mutations.

The WGS data were used to call single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and indels according to a standard protocol [22]. To analyze the pegRNA-dependent off-target effects, 1595 potential off-target sites with up to 5 nt mismatches for the three pegRNAs and 740 sites for the three nicking sgRNAs in the reference genome were predicted by Cas-OFFinder [23] (Additional file 1: Table S1). We found that WGS mutations were absent at the off-target sites in the ePE3 and ePE5c plants.

To evaluate the pegRNA-independent off-target effects, an average of 339, 429, and 391 SNVs per plant were detected in the control, ePE3, and ePE5c groups, respectively. By comparing the numbers of SNVs, we found that ePE5c-induced genome-wide base substitutions were indistinguishable from those observed in the ePE3 and control groups (Fig. 3a, P > 0.05). In addition, the preference patterns for the substitution types in ePE5c plants were statistically identical to those in the control and ePE3 plants (Fig. 3b, P > 0.05). The SNVs of ePE3 and ePE5c were subsequently mapped to the genome. The random distribution across the chromosomes suggested the absence of mutation hotspots (Additional file 1: Fig. S4). Further annotation of the mutations revealed that the ePE5c lines had similar distributions of SNVs in coding sequences and noncoding regions compared with the ePE3 and control lines (Additional file 1: Fig. S5, P > 0.05). In addition, an average of 155, 170, and 170 indels were identified in the control, ePE3, and ePE5c plants, respectively. The overall number and proportion of indels in the ePE5c plants were not different from those in the ePE3 or control plants (Fig. 3c, d; P > 0.05). A comparison of the plants according to the target sites also confirmed that ePE5c had a similar number of indels as ePE3 (Fig. 3c; P > 0.05). Overall, we could conclude that ePE5c did not induce detectable pegRNA-independent off-target effects in the transgenic plants.

Fig. 3
figure 3

PegRNA-independent off-target analyses of ePE5c by WGS in rice plants. a Numbers of SNVs in the control, ePE3, and ePE5c plants. The number of SNVs in each individual line is indicated by a dot. The numbers of SNVs in all the ePE5c plants were compared with those in all the control and ePE3 plants. Alternatively, the numbers of SNVs in D2-T-, MPK3-T-, and WRKY32-T-targeting ePE5c plants were compared with those in ePE3 lines. b Comparison of different types of SNVs in ePE5c plants versus control and ePE3 plants. The average numbers were obtained from six SpCas9 control plants and from nine ePE3 and ePE5c plants. c Numbers of indels in the control, ePE3, and ePE5c plants. d Proportions of insertions and deletions among indels identified in the control, ePE3, and ePE5c plants. The means ± SDs are presented. The differences were assessed by a two-sided Mann–Whitney test. n.s., P > 0.05

Full size image

Reduced fertility of ePE5c plants

It has been reported that osmlh1-knockout plants exhibit normal vegetative growth but are sterile or at least partially sterile during the reproductive stage [24,25,26]. To examine the morphological changes caused by OsMLH1 RNAi, independent ePE3 and ePE5c homozygous T0 mutants of MPK3-T and WRKY32-T were grown in the field for seed production. As expected, the ePE3 and ePE5c lines exhibited regular growth during the vegetative stage, whereas the fertility of the ePE5c plants was markedly lower than that of the ePE3 plants (Fig. 2c, d). The average seed-setting rate of the ePE5c plants was 19.89%, which was significantly lower than that of the ePE3 plants (82.64%) (P < 0.05; Fig. 2e). We also observed nearly complete sterility in some plants, e.g., the seed-setting rates were as low as 1.64% in line #6 of ePE5c-MPK3-T and 3.57% in line #1 of ePE5c-WRKY32-T (Additional file 1: Fig. S3). Therefore, although enhanced editing efficiency was obtained, ePE5c may not be an ideal system for heritable genetic engineering due to fertility reduction.

Conditional excision of the OsMLH1-RNAi cassette in ePE5c T-DNA

Given that most heritable edits are produced by the CRISPR system in the early stage of rice callus transformation [27], we hypothesized that eliminating the OsMLH1 RNAi elements before the regeneration of ePE5c plants might enhance the editing efficiency without disrupting fertility. To remove the OsMLH1-ihpRNA cassette from transgenic plants, ePE5c-Cre was designed by integrating a conditional Cre-LoxP recombination system into the ePE5c system. A drought-inducible Rab17 promoter was used to drive Cre, which mediates site-specific DNA recombination between the two LoxP sites in the T-DNA to excise the OsMLH1-RNAi element and the Cre expression cassette itself. In addition, a CaMV 35S promoter and a phosphomannose isomerase (PMI) selectable marker gene were added upstream of the first LoxP site and downstream of the second LoxP site, respectively (Fig. 4a). Once excision occurs, the PMI marker should be activated, thus enriching the recombination events under mannose selection.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Conditional excision of the OsMLH1-ihpRNA cassette during editing. a Schematic diagram of the ePE5c-Cre system. 35S Pro, CaMV35S promoter. The black arrows indicate primers used for the identification of excision. b Analysis of excision in T0 lines. Plants were regenerated from untreated resistant calli (Mock) or from drought-stressed calli with (Drought/Man +) or without (Drought/Man −) additional mannose selection. Representative PCR products from ten ePE5c-Cre-WRKY32-T lines subjected to each treatment are shown. The ePE5c-Cre plasmid was used as a positive control ( +) for amplification, and the genomic DNA of untransformed plants was used as a negative control ( −). c Excision efficiency of ePE5c-Cre plants. All regenerated plants listed in Additional file 1: Table S3 were examined via PCR. The excision frequencies of ePE5c-Cre-Pid3-T/WRKY32-T were calculated and averaged to obtain the mean efficiencies. d Editing of the excised lines of ePE5c-Cre. The target mutations in Pid3-T (left) and WRKY32-T (right) were examined in 42 excised lines of ePE5c-Cre. The same number of ePE5c lines was tested in parallel as a control. e Comparison of the gross morphology of ePE5c lines and excised lines of ePE5c-Cre. Representative ePE5c and excised ePE5c-Cre T0 lines harboring homozygous mutations at WRKY32-T are shown at the yellow ripening stage. Excision restored the sterility of ePE5c. Scale bar = 10 cm. f Statistical analysis of the seed-setting rates of the ePE5c and ePE5c-Cre lines. The seed-setting rates were determined in the homozygous mutants, which included 16 excision lines of ePE5c-Cre (8 lines for Pid3-T and 8 random lines for WRKY32-T, n = 16) and 15 lines of ePE5c (7 lines for Pid3-T and 8 random lines for WRKY32-T, n = 15). The differences were assessed by an independent t test. **, P < 0.01

Full size image

We examined the editing of ePE5c-Cre at the Pid3-T and WRKY32-T sites in Agrobacterium-mediated stable rice transformation. To establish rigorous controls, ePE5c was also used to edit the same targets. After hygromycin selection, resistant ePE5c and ePE5c-Cre calli were obtained at comparable frequencies, suggesting that the Cre system did not inhibit the growth of cells (Additional file 1: Table S2.). Subsequently, the resistant calli were air-dried for 36 h to induce Cre expression. The regeneration rates of drought-treated calli did not decrease and even slightly increased (Additional file 1: Table S3). To enrich the excised products, mannose was added to the regeneration medium. Due to the lack of PMI gene, ePE5c calli cannot survive with mannose supplementation. In contrast, plants were regenerated from drought-induced ePE5c-Cre cells, suggesting the activation of PMI through successful excision. However, the average regeneration frequency of ePE5c-Cre calli under additional mannose selection decreased to 11.0% compared with the frequency of 22.7% obtained from regular transformation (Additional file 1: Table S3).

Cre-induced recombination in the regenerated plants was examined by three site-specific PCRs (Fig. 4b). A primer for the CaMV 35S promoter (35S-F) and a primer for the PMI gene (PMI-R) were designed across the ~ 5.9-Kb Cre and OsMLH1-RNAi cassettes to identify the excision site. Two primers were further developed upstream of the OsMLH1-RNAi cassette (UBI-R) and downstream of the Cre cassette (Cre-F). The primer pairs 35S-F/UBI-R and Cre-F/PMI-R were also used to verify Cre-mediated recombination. The excision statuses of all the regenerated ePE5c-Cre plants were examined. Even without drought treatment, auto-excision still occurred in 2.4 to 5.6% of the lines (Fig. 4c). This unexpected recombination may be caused by leakage of the Rab17 promoter under non-inducing conditions [28]. After drought exposure, the excision frequency increased to 60.2% in the ePE5c lines targeting the WRKY32-T site and 72.5% in the plants targeting Pid3-T site. During mannose-facilitated regeneration, none of the plants harbored the OsMLH1-RNAi and Cre molecular modules (Fig. 4c). These results validated the enrichment of recombination events by the PMI activation strategy. To confirm the precision of recombination, the 35S-F/PMI-R amplicons of several excision lines were analyzed. Sanger sequencing showed that only a copy of LoxP was retained in the T-DNA fragment as designed (Additional file 1: Fig. S6).

OsMLH1-RNAi excision rescues plant fertility without disrupting the editing of ePE5c-Cre

To elucidate the effect of excision on PE activity, the editing of ePE5c-Cre was assessed in plants from the same batch of transformation. By genotyping independent T0 events at the Pid3-T site (Fig. 4d), we found that 28 out of 42 ePE5c-Cre plants (with an occurrence frequency of 66.67%) carried the desired mutation, comparing to the editing of ePE5c in 32 out of 42 lines (76.19% frequency). In addition, 8 lines of ePE5c-Cre and 7 lines of ePE5c were precisely edited at both alleles, resulting in homozygous mutation frequencies of 19.05% and 16.67%, respectively. At the WRKY32-T site, all the ePE5c-Cre plants and 95.24% of the ePE5c plants were edited (Fig. 4d). Among them, 88.10% of the ePE5c lines and 83.33% of the ePE5c-Cre lines were homozygous mutants. Furthermore, the mannose selection-enriched excised lines were also analyzed. At the Pid3-T site, 78.57% of the plants were edited, including 23.81% of the plants with homozygous mutations. In addition, 100% of the plants were edited at the WRKY32-T site, including 95.24% of the plants with homozygous mutations (Fig. 4d). These results demonstrated that the ePE5c-Cre system was remained highly effective in excised lines.

Fertility should be restored after removal of the OsMLH1-ihpRNA cassette of ePE5c-Cre. To verify this hypothesis, the reproductive performance of the excised plants was analyzed. Markedly improved fertility was observed in the excised ePE5c-Cre lines compared with the ePE5c lines (Fig. 4e). Additionally, the seed-setting rates of the excised ePE5c-Cre plants were significantly greater than those of the ePE5c plants (Fig. 4f), confirming that ePE5c-induced sterility can be eliminated by conditional excision.

Discussion

DNA MMR strongly antagonizes the PE of base substitutions and small indels [9, 10]. The PE efficiency can be reliably enhanced by the expression of hMLH1dn to transiently ablate MMR activity in human cells [9]. However, strategies for expressing hMLH1dn or its plant orthologs have been less exploited in extensive studies of engineered plant prime editors [29,30,31,32,33,34]. Limited data from MLH1dn-faciliated plant prime editors have shown vague and inconsistent effects on efficiency, although the percentage of homozygous mutants could increase at some targets, possibly due to long-term expression. In this report, we provide further data showing that neither exogenous hMLH1dn nor endogenous OsMLH1dn significantly improved the editing activity of our recently optimized ePE2 system in stably transformed rice cells. Given the markedly lower number of exogenous gene copies delivered during Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation than during mammalian cell transient transformation, it is reasonable to suspect that the expression of MLH1dn in plant prime editors may be insufficient to effectively inhibit MMR. In addition to the use of dominant-negative variants, the editing efficiency could be enhanced by direct manipulation of the MLH1 transcript via CRISPRi or siRNA in HEK293 or K562 cells [9, 10]. Inspired by these results, we attempted to optimize the ePE2 system through the disruption of MLH1 accumulation via RNAi in plants. The resulting ePE5c system exhibited significantly increased editing efficiency and yielded obviously increased ratios of both overall mutants and homozygous mutants. We believe that this approach can be easily adopted for other species by integrating the RNAi module of native MLH1 or other MMR genes into prime editors and thus constitutes a stable and conspicuous strategy to improve plant PE efficiency.

Loss-of-function mlh1 mutants of monocots and dicots consistently exhibit reproductive defects [24,25,26, 35]. In rice, the seed-setting rate of loss-of-function lines could be reduced to approximately 40% in indica Guangluai4 background and to less than 20% in japonica Dongjing [26]. Moreover, the average rates decreased to less than 10% in knockout mutants of indica Huazhan [24], which is similar to the approximate 80–90% reductions observed in CRISPR-induced mutants of japonica ZH11 [25]. In this study, the RNAi-mediated suppression of OsMLH1 led to severe reproductive disturbances in japonica Nipponbare plants as well. Therefore, the RNAi module of ePE5c presumably hampers the fertility of various rice varieties, which largely diluted its benefits on efficiency enhancement. Although the OsMLH1-ihpRNA cassette-containing T-DNA could be segregated out in T0 progenies by self-crossing (Additional file 1: Table S4), the small number of seeds notably impedes the screening of T-DNA-free edited offspring. To solve this problem, a conditional Cre-mediated excision system was introduced into the ePE5c vector [36]. Simple and short-term drought treatment induced precise excision in 66.4% of the transgenic plants, restoring the fertility of the plants with enhanced PEs to normal. With an enrichment system through simple selection, 100% excision could be achieved, which would greatly reduce the screening cost of excised plants. Interestingly, the regeneration frequency of ePE5c-Cre decreased under double selection with hygromycin plus mannose, whereas a minor increase in the homozygous mutation ratio was observed. A possible reason for this finding is that plants were over-selected by additional pressure, resulting in mild retardation of growth as well as enrichment of cells with high expression. Consequently, normal regeneration and a high proportion of excision could be expected when using mannose as the sole selection agent during the regeneration process in the future.

Failure of MMR may impair the maintenance of the plant genome. Artificial expression of dominant-negative variants of AtPMS2, which dimerizes with MLH1 to form a MutLα heterodimer, or OsPMS1, which dimerizes with MLH1 to form a MutLβ heterodimer, increased the base substitution ratio and induced microsatellite instability (MSI) of genome [37, 38]. MSH2, the conserved protein of the MutS complex, has been proven to be involved in the regulation of somatic mutations and homologous recombination (HR) in Arabidopsis and tobacco [39,40,41]. A Tos17 insertion mutation in the rice MutSα component OsMSH6 resulted in the accumulation of spontaneous single-nucleotide mutations, HR, and MSI [42, 43]. Although there is a lack of direct evidence of the effect of MLH1 on the mutation burden of plants, stable tissue-specific suppression or the null mutation mlh1 increased the MSI in mice [44, 45]. Therefore, transient but not stable MMR inhibition during PE is desirable to avoid potential damage to the plant genome. A previous study showed that 3 days of PE4 expression did not trigger MSI in HeLa cells [9]. In addition, no OsMLH1dn-associated random mutations were found in the progeny of transgenic rice of PE5max [46]. Our results confirmed that ePE5c did not significantly increase the frequency of whole-genome base mutations in newly regenerated T0 rice. However, we cannot rule out the possibility of genome damage by whole-growth-period expression of ePE5c. To alleviate this risk, an excision system was designed to remove the OsMLH1-ihpRNA cassette after 3 weeks of selection. Effective editing of ePE5c may occur much earlier than plant regeneration; therefore, excision does not attenuate the efficiency improvement resulted from OsMLH1 suppression. Considering that drought treatment is difficult during callus growth on medium, the Rab17 promoter of ePE5c-Cre can be replaced with a heat- or light-induction system to activate recombination. In this case, excision would be conveniently induced at a series of time points. By comparing the editing efficiencies, a minimal time requirement of RNAi suppression can be determined to maximally reduce the risk of genome damage while maintaining a promising enhancement effect. During the preparation of this manuscript, David Liu’s group published a report showing that transient inhibition of MMR through microinjection of mMLH1dn mRNA into two-cell-stage mouse embryos resulted in highly efficient prime editing [47]. WGS of the edited mice also revealed that transient inhibition of MLH1 resulted in identical SNVs and a limited increase in the number of indels in repetitive sequences, which did not lead to any detectable phenotypic consequences [47]. These data also confirmed our hypothesis in plants that short-term inhibition of MMR genes can enhance PE efficiency with a low risk of genetic instability for research or breeding purposes. Taken together, the results of this proof-of-concept study indicate that prime editor optimization via an excisable RNAi module of MMR genes is an attractive strategy for substantially improving plant editing efficiency in a safe and reliable manner.

Conclusions

The highly specific ePE5c system significantly improved PE efficiency in stably transformed rice calli and regenerated plants through direct RNAi knockdown of OsMLH1 instead of coexpressing MLH1dn variants. The knockdown of OsMLH1 led to a reduction in fertility in ePE5c plants, which could be overcome by conditional excision of the RNAi module without hindering the improvement of activity. This optimization by transient MMR inhibition could substantially enhance the efficiency without disturbing plant development, providing a safe and reliable strategy that can be widely applied in engineering efficient PE systems for different plant species.

Methods

Vector construction

All the vectors were developed from the pHUC-ePE2 backbone [16]. To construct ePE2-hMLH1dn for the ePE5a system and ePE2-OsMLH1dn for the ePE5b system, codon-optimized hMLH1dn [15] and OsMLH1dn [13] were added to the 3′ terminus of ePE2 with a P2A self-cleavage linker. To construct the ePE5c system, a 266-bp coding sequence spanning exons 2, 3, and 4 of OsMLH1 was selected as the RNAi region (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). The sequence and its reverse repeat were amplified from cDNA and inserted into opposite ends of an intron from potato GA20ox1-3 [48]. The constructed ihpRNA was subsequently introduced downstream of the maize ubiquitin 1 promoter. The RNAi cassette was then subcloned and inserted into ePE2 via Pme I digestion. The PE3 and PE5 strategies were performed by assembling the OsU3-driven sgRNA cassette into the ePE vectors as previously described [49].

To establish the conditional excision system, the Rab17 promoter was cloned from maize genomic DNA. The plant codon-optimized coding sequence of Cre was separated with an intron of the Arabidopsis endo-1,4-beta-D-glucanase gene KOR to minimize unintended expression. A terminator from the pea rbcS gene was linked downstream of the synthesized Cre gene to form the expression cassette (Genscript, Nanjing, China). The LoxP-RNAi-Cre-LoxP module was constructed via Gibson assembly. To enrich the excision events, we replaced the OsMLH1-ihpRNA cassette with the PMI cassette in ePE5c. The excision module was subsequently inserted between the CaMV 35S promoter and PMI [50] to construct ePE5c-Cre. All the vectors were verified by Sanger sequencing (Sangon, Shanghai, China).

The design and integration of gRNAs were conducted according to previous methods [15]. To provide negative selection of recombinant plasmids, the resistance genes for spectinomycin and gentamicin were pre-integrated into the pegRNA and nicking sgRNA cassette, respectively. The clones were screened by bacterial PCR and confirmed by Sanger sequencing. The high-fidelity polymerase, restriction endonucleases, ligases, and Gibson mixtures used in the study were obtained from NEB (Ipswich, USA). The pegRNA sequences and sgRNA nicking sites are listed in Additional file 1: Table S5. The detail of conditional excision RNAi module is shown in the Additional file 1: Supplemental Sequence.

Rice transformation and plant growth

Embryonic calli were induced from mature seeds of rice (Oryza sativa spp. japonica cultivar Nipponbare) for 2 to 3 weeks. Well-grown calli were collected and transformed with Agrobacterium strain EHA105. The infected calli were selected with 50 mg/L hygromycin. The emergence of calli from one initial callus was recognized as an independent event. After 3 to 4 weeks of selection, three yellowish, spherical calli from each resistance event were transferred to regenerate plants under 25 mg/L hygromycin selection. When the regenerated plants had grown to a length of 2–3 cm, they were transferred to rooting media for another 4 to 5 weeks. For the assessment of fertility, the genotyped plants were grown from May to October in the field at Hefei (32° 28′ 48″ N, 117° 10′ 12″ E) or in a greenhouse with a 16 h/8 h photoperiod at 26 °C to 30 °C.

The conditional excisions were guided based on a previously described strategy [36]. The resistant calli were desiccated on a stack of three dry 90-mm filter papers in Petri dishes for 36 h. The treatment was conducted at 28 °C in the dark to maintain differentiation activity. For the enrichment of excised plants, 5 g/L sucrose + 15 g/L mannose was used as the carbon source in the regeneration medium to select PMI-resistant plants [50].

Analysis of on-target editing

To determine the on-target editing efficiencies of PE systems, newly emerged calli were sampled after 2 to 3 weeks of selection. From each transformant, approximately 200 calli with diameters less than 4 mm were collected and ground together. A commercial plant genomic DNA isolation kit was used for the extraction and purification of genomic DNA (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China). The amplicons were amplified with Q5 high-fidelity polymerase and sequenced on the Illumina NextSeq platform via a paired-end 150-bp (PE-150) strategy (Genwiz, Suzhou, China). More than 0.5 Gb of data were generated per sample and analyzed with CRISPResso2 software [51]. The amplicon-NGS data have been deposited in the SRA database under the BioProject accession number PRJNA1073312 [52].

To identify edits in plants, leaves of independent lines were collected from at least three different tillers for DNA extraction. The targeting sites were examined by Hi-TOM sequencing with a 10% threshold. The screened mutations were randomly verified by Sanger sequencing PCR amplicons. All primers used in this study are listed in Additional file 1: Table S5.

To genotype the progenies, seeds of independent T0 lines were dehulled, sterilized, and germinated in 1/2 MS medium for a week. Targeted editing was confirmed by Hi-TOM analysis. Two pairs of primers for the RNAi module and the Cas9 module were designed to amplify the T-DNA fragment.

WGS analyses

Six WTs, six SpCas9 transgenic T0 lines, nine ePE3 T0 homozygous mutants (consisting of three lines for each target), and nine ePE5c homozygous mutants were subjected to WGS. Genomic DNA was extracted from the leaves of the plants after 5 weeks of rooting using a DNA isolation kit (Tiangen). The quality of the extracted DNA was inspected, after which the DNA was subsequently used to construct DNA libraries. Rice genome sequencing was carried out on the DNB SEQ platform (BGI, Shenzheng, China).

Each sample yielded an average of approximately 20 Gb of clean sequencing reads, with an average depth of 50 × . The original sequencing data files obtained from the platform were subjected to base recognition analysis, after which the sequences were transformed into raw sequences. These results were stored in the FASTQ file format. To ensure data quality, fastp software (v0.20.1) was used for quality control and to filter the raw reads [53], resulting in the acquisition of clean reads. All subsequent analyses were based on these clean reads.

The clean reads were subsequently mapped to the Nipponbare genome using the BWA software (v0.7.17). The resulting sequence alignment/MAP (SAM) files were converted to binary alignment/map (BAM) files using SAMtools with the “sort” parameter [54]. Next, SAMtools (with the “markdup-r” parameter) was used to remove duplicates from the sorted comparison results for downstream analysis. The variation in the samples was then determined using GATK (version 4.2.5.0) with reference to the file with the comparison results. To identify SNVs, overlaps were determined using three mutation identification software packages: GATK (v4.2.5.0), LoFreq (v2.1.2), and Strelka2 (v2.9.10) [55,56,57]. Similarly, the GATK (V4.2.5.0) and Strelka2 (v2.9.10) software packages were used for calling indels. Background mutations from the wild-type plants were filtered out, resulting in the final set of SNVs and indels.

To ensure data quality, the quantity of data from each individual sample was required to be no less than 90% of the target data volume. Additionally, the sequencing coverage of all the samples had to reach 99%. The number of clean reads obtained exceeded 1.4 × 109, and the mapping rate reached 99.98%.

Identification of excisions

The excision of all the regenerated ePE5c-Cre lines was assessed by PCR with the 35S-F, UBI-R, Cre-F, and PMI-R primers (Additional file 1: Table S5). To confirm precise recombination, the amplicons of 35S-F and PMI-R from 12 excised lines were subjected to Sanger sequencing. To determine the effects of the Cre system on editing, 42 independent T0 lines from each treatment were genotyped via the Hi-TOM assay.

Reverse transcription and quantitative PCR

Independent callus events (~ 0.1 g per sample) after 3 weeks of selection or leaves (~ 0.2 g per sample) of regenerated T0 lines after 5 weeks of rooting were used for the extraction of total RNA using an RNA Easy Fast Plant Tissue Kit (Tiangen Biotech). A FastKing RT Kit was used for reverse transcription of cDNA, which was used as the template (Tiangen Biotech). qRT–PCR analysis was performed with a QTOWER 2.0 system (Analytik Jena, Germany). The expression of OsMLH1 was quantified with the ∆∆Ct method using OsACTIN2 as the reference housekeeping gene.

Availability of data and materials

All data supporting the findings of this study are available in the article and its supplementary figures and tables. The amplicon-NGS data can be achieved in the SRA database under the BioProject accession number PRJNA1073312 [52].

References

  1. Gao C. Genome engineering for crop improvement and future agriculture. Cell. 2021;184:1621–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Li S, Li J, He Y, Xu M, Zhang J, Du W, Zhao Y, Xia L. Precise gene replacement in rice by RNA transcript-templated homologous recombination. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:445–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang M, Lu Y, Botella JR, Mao Y, Hua K. Zhu J-k: Gene targeting by homology-directed repair in rice using a geminivirus-based CRISPR/Cas9 system. Mol Plant. 2017;10:1007–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Miki D, Zhang W, Zeng W, Feng Z, Zhu J-K. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene targeting in Arabidopsis using sequential transformation. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1967.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Barone P, Wu E, Lenderts B, Anand A, Gordon-Kamm W, Svitashev S, Kumar S. Efficient gene targeting in maize using inducible CRISPR-Cas9 and marker-free donor template. Mol Plant. 2020;13:1219–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lu Y, Tian Y, Shen R, Yao Q, Wang M, Chen M, Dong J, Zhang T, Li F, Lei M, Zhu J-K. Targeted, efficient sequence insertion and replacement in rice. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38:1402–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Molla KA, Sretenovic S, Bansal KC, Qi Y. Precise plant genome editing using base editors and prime editors. Nat Plants. 2021;7:1166–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Anzalone AV, Randolph PB, Davis JR, Sousa AA, Koblan LW, Levy JM, Chen PJ, Wilson C, Newby GA, Raguram A, Liu DR. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature. 2019;576:149–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen PJ, Hussmann JA, Yan J, Knipping F, Ravisankar P, Chen P-F, Chen C, Nelson JW, Newby GA, Sahin M, et al. Enhanced prime editing systems by manipulating cellular determinants of editing outcomes. Cell. 2021;184:5635-5652.e5629.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferreira da Silva J, Oliveira GP, Arasa-Verge EA, Kagiou C, Moretton A, Timelthaler G, Jiricny J, Loizou JI. Prime editing efficiency and fidelity are enhanced in the absence of mismatch repair. Nat Commun. 2022;13:760.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sretenovic S, Qi Y. Plant prime editing goes prime. Nat Plants. 2022;8:20–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Li J, Zhang C, He Y, Li S, Yan L, Li Y, Zhu Z, Xia L. Plant base editing and prime editing: the current status and future perspectives. J Integr Plant Biol. 2023;65:444–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang Y, Chai Y, Qiao D, Wang J, Xin C, Sun W, Cao Z, Zhang Y, Zhou Y, Wang XC, Chen QJ. Optimized prime editing efficiently generates glyphosate-resistant rice plants carrying homozygous TAP-IVS mutation in EPSPS. Mol Plant. 2022;15:1646–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Qiao D, Wang J, Lu MH, Xin C, Chai Y, Jiang Y, Sun W, Cao Z, Guo S, Wang XC, Chen QJ. Optimized prime editing efficiently generates heritable mutations in maize. J Integr Plant Biol. 2023;65:900–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Li J, Chen L, Liang J, Xu R, Jiang Y, Li Y, Ding J, Li M, Qin R, Wei P. Development of a highly efficient prime editor 2 system in plants. Genome Biol. 2022;23:161.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Li J, Ding J, Zhu J, Xu R, Gu D, Liu X, Liang J, Qiu C, Wang H, Li M. Prime editing-mediated precise knockin of protein tag sequences in the rice genome. Plant Commun. 2023;4:100572.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang R-X, Li B-B, Yang Z-G, Huang J-Q, Sun W-H, Bhanbhro N, Liu W-T, Chen K-M. Dissecting plant gene functions using CRISPR toolsets for crop improvement. J Agric Food Chem. 2022;70:7343–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu Q, Wang C, Jiao X, Zhang H, Song L, Li Y, Gao C, Wang K. Hi-TOM: a platform for high-throughput tracking of mutations induced by CRISPR/Cas systems. Sci China Life Sci. 2019;62:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jin S, Lin Q, Luo Y, Zhu Z, Liu G, Li Y, Chen K, Qiu JL, Gao C. Genome-wide specificity of prime editors in plants. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39:1292–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gao R, Fu Z-C, Li X, Wang Y, Wei J, Li G, Wang L, Wu J, Huang X, Yang L. Genomic and transcriptomic analyses of prime editing guide RNA–independent off-target effects by prime editors. CRISPR J. 2022;5:276–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang S, Zhang Z, Tao W, Liu Y, Li X, Wang X, Harati J, Wang P-Y, Huang X, Lin C-P. Broadening prime editing toolkits using RNA-Pol-II-driven engineered pegRNA. Mol Ther. 2022;30:2923–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Jin S, Gao Q, Gao C. An unbiased method for evaluating the genome-wide specificity of base editors in rice. Nat Protoc. 2021;16:431–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bae S, Park J, Kim J-S. Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1473–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Mao B, Zheng W, Huang Z, Peng Y, Shao Y, Liu C, Tang L, Hu Y, Li Y, Hu L, et al. Rice MutLγ, the MLH1–MLH3 heterodimer, participates in the formation of type I crossovers and regulation of embryo sac fertility. Plant Biotechnol J. 2021;19:1443–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Xin X, Li X, Zhu J, Liu X, Chu Z, Shen J, Wu C. OsMLH1 interacts with OsMLH3 to regulate synapsis and interference-sensitive crossover formation during meiosis in rice. J Genet Genomics. 2021;48:485–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu K, Chen E, Gu Z, Dai B, Wang A, Zhu Z, Feng Q, Zhou C, Zhu J, Shangguan Y, et al. A retrotransposon insertion in MUTL-HOMOLOG 1 affects wild rice seed set and cultivated rice crossover rate. Plant Physiol. 2022;190:1747–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang H, Zhang J, Wei P, Zhang B, Gou F, Feng Z, Mao Y, Yang L, Zhang H, Xu N, Zhu J-K. The CRISPR/Cas9 system produces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation. Plant Biotechnol J. 2014;12:797–807.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang N, Arling M, Hoerster G, Ryan L, Wu E, Lowe K, Gordon-Kamm W, Jones TJ, Chilcoat ND, Anand A. An efficient gene excision system in maize. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:1298.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Li H, Zhu Z, Li S, Li J, Yan L, Zhang C, Ma Y, Xia L. Multiplex precision gene editing by a surrogate prime editor in rice. Mol Plant. 2022;15:1077–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Xu W, Yang Y, Yang B, Krueger CJ, Xiao Q, Zhao S, Zhang L, Kang G, Wang F, Yi H, et al. A design optimized prime editor with expanded scope and capability in plants. Nat Plants. 2022;8:45–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zong Y, Liu Y, Xue C, Li B, Li X, Wang Y, Li J, Liu G, Huang X, Cao X, Gao C. An engineered prime editor with enhanced editing efficiency in plants. Nat Biotechnol. 2022;40:1394–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zou J, Meng X, Liu Q, Shang M, Wang K, Li J, Yu H, Wang C. Improving the efficiency of prime editing with epegRNAs and high-temperature treatment in rice. Sci China Life Sci. 2022;65:2328–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Liang Z, Wu Y, Guo Y, Wei S. Addition of the T5 exonuclease increases the prime editing efficiency in plants. J Genet Genomics. 2023;50:582–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ni P, Zhao Y, Zhou X, Liu Z, Huang Z, Ni Z, Sun Q, Zong Y. Efficient and versatile multiplex prime editing in hexaploid wheat. Genome Biol. 2023;24:156.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Dion É, Li L, Jean M, Belzile F. An Arabidopsis MLH1 mutant exhibits reproductive defects and reveals a dual role for this gene in mitotic recombination. Plant J. 2007;51:431–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lowe K, Wu E, Wang N, Hoerster G, Hastings C, Cho M-J, Scelonge C, Lenderts B, Chamberlin M, Cushatt J, et al. Morphogenic regulators Baby boom and Wuschel improve monocot transformation. Plant Cell. 2016;28:1998–2015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Chao Q, Sullivan CD, Getz JM, Gleason KB, Sass PM, Nicolaides NC, Grasso L. Rapid generation of plant traits via regulation of DNA mismatch repair. Plant Biotechnol J. 2005;3:399–407.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Xu J, Li M, Chen L, Wu G, Li H. Rapid generation of rice mutants via the dominant negative suppression of the mismatch repair protein OsPMS1. Theor Appl Genet. 2012;125:975–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Emmanuel E, Yehuda E, Melamed-Bessudo C, Avivi-Ragolsky N, Levy AA. The role of AtMSH2 in homologous recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana. EMBO Rep. 2006;7:100–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lafleuriel J, Degroote F, Depeiges A, Picard G. Impact of the loss of AtMSH2 on double-strand break-induced recombination between highly diverged homeologous sequences in Arabidopsis thaliana germinal tissues. Plant Mol Biol. 2007;63:833–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Van Marcke I, Angenon G. Genomic stability in Nicotiana plants upon silencing of the mismatch repair gene MSH2. Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2013;7:467–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Cui H, Wu Q, Zhu B. Specific-locus amplified fragment sequencing reveals spontaneous single-nucleotide mutations in rice OsMsh6 mutants. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4816973.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Jiang M, Wu X, Song Y, Shen H, Cui H. Effects of OsMSH6 mutations on microsatellite stability and homeologous recombination in rice. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:220.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Prolla TA, Baker SM, Harris AC, Tsao J-L, Yao X, Bronner CE, Zheng B, Gordon M, Reneker J, Arnheim N. Tumour susceptibility and spontaneous mutation in mice deficient in Mlh1, Pms1 and Pms2 DMA mismatch repair. Nat Genet. 1998;18:276–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Shrestha KS, Aska E-M, Tuominen MM, Kauppi L. Tissue-specific reduction in MLH1 expression induces microsatellite instability in intestine of Mlh1+/− mice. DNA Repair. 2021;106:103178.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gupta A, Liu B, Chen Q-J, Yang B. High-efficiency prime editing enables new strategies for broad-spectrum resistance to bacterial blight of rice. Plant Biotechnol J. 2023;21:1454–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Kim-Yip RP, McNulty R, Joyce B, Mollica A, Chen PJ, Ravisankar P, Law BK, Liu DR, Toettcher JE, Ivakine EA, et al. Efficient prime editing in two-cell mouse embryos using PEmbryo. Nat Biotechnol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-02106-x.

  48. Jiang P, Wang S, Jiang H, Cheng B, Wu K, Ding Y. The COMPASS-like complex promotes flowering and panicle branching in rice. Plant Physiol. 2018;176:2761–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Xu R, Li J, Liu X, Shan T, Qin R, Wei P. Development of plant prime-editing systems for precise genome editing. Plant Commun. 2020;1:100043.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Hu L, Li H, Qin R, Xu R, Li J, Li L, Wei P, Yang J. Plant phosphomannose isomerase as a selectable marker for rice transformation. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25921.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Clement K, Rees H, Canver MC, Gehrke JM, Farouni R, Hsu JY, Cole MA, Liu DR, Joung JK, Bauer DE, Pinello L. CRISPResso2 provides accurate and rapid genome editing sequence analysis. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:224–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Liu X, Gu D, Zhang Y, Jiang Y, Xiao Z, Xu R, Qin R, Li J, Wei P. Conditional knockdown of OsMLH1 to improve plant prime editing systems without disturbing fertility in rice. Dataset NCBI SRA BioProject accession number PRJNA1073312. 2024. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/PRJNA1073312. Accessed 5 Feb 2024.

  53. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:i884–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. The sequence alignment/map format and samtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, Garimella K, Altshuler D, Gabriel S, Daly M, DePristo MA. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Wilm A, Aw PPK, Bertrand D, Yeo GHT, Ong SH, Wong CH, Khor CC, Petric R, Hibberd ML, Nagarajan N. LoFreq: a sequence-quality aware, ultra-sensitive variant caller for uncovering cell-population heterogeneity from high-throughput sequencing datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:11189–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Kim S, Scheffler K, Halpern AL, Bekritsky MA, Noh E, Källberg M, Chen X, Kim Y, Beyter D, Krusche P, Saunders CT. Strelka2: fast and accurate calling of germline and somatic variants. Nat Methods. 2018;15:591–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Peer review information

Kevin Pang was the primary editor of this article and managed its editorial process and peer review in collaboration with the rest of the editorial team.

Review history

The review history is available as Additional file 2.

Funding

This work was funded by STI 2030 – Major Projects (2023ZD04074), the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32270430, No. 32300343, and No. 32300341), the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (No. 2208085Y11 and No. 2308085Y20), the National Postdoctoral Foundation (No. 2023M740020 and No. GZC20230021), the Innovative Research Team of Anhui Education (No. 2022AH010056), and the Science and Technology Major Project of Anhui Province (No. 2023n06020020).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xiaoshuang Liu and Dongfang Gu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, People’s Republic of China

    Xiaoshuang Liu, Yiru Zhang, Yingli Jiang, Zhi Xiao & Pengcheng Wei

  2. Rice Research Institute, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei, 230031, People’s Republic of China

    Dongfang Gu, Rongfang Xu, Ruiying Qin & Juan Li

  3. Research Centre for Biological Breeding Technology, Advance Academy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, People’s Republic of China

    Pengcheng Wei

Authors
  1. Xiaoshuang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dongfang Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yiru Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yingli Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhi Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rongfang Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ruiying Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Juan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Pengcheng Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

P.W. supervised the project. P.W. and J.L. designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript with input from all the authors. X.L., D.G., Y.J., R.X., and R.Q. constructed the vectors, determined the efficiency, and performed the expression assays and morphological observations. Z.X. conducted the off-target effect analysis. X.L. and Y.Z. transformed the plants. J.L., X.L., and D.G. analyzed the data.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Juan Li or Pengcheng Wei.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

13059_2024_3282_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Additional file 1: Fig. S1. Diagram of the RNAi construct of OsMLH1. Fig. S2. Byproduct indel efficiencies of ePE3 and ePE5c in calli. Fig. S3. Editing of ePE3 and ePE5c in individual transgenic plants. Table S1. Putative pegRNA spacer or nick sgRNA sequence-like off-target sites predicted by Cas-OFFinder. Fig. S4. Genomic distribution of the SNVs and indels identified by WGS. Fig. S5. Numbers of SNVs located in different gene regions. Table S2. Selection of calli transformed with ePE5c and ePE5c-Cre under hygromycin pressure. Table S3. Plant regeneration of ePE5c and ePE5c-Cre transformants. Fig. S6. Sequencing of the excision site of ePE5c-Cre plants. Table S4. Transmission of edits and T-DNA in the T1 generation of ePE5c. Table S5. Sequences of the pegRNAs, nicking sgRNAs, and primers used in this study. Supplemental Sequence.

Additional file 2. Review history.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X., Gu, D., Zhang, Y. et al. Conditional knockdown of OsMLH1 to improve plant prime editing systems without disturbing fertility in rice. Genome Biol 25, 131 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-024-03282-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-024-03282-y

Keywords

Genome Biology

ISSN: 1474-760X

Contact us