Three Dimensional Organization of the Nucleus: adding DNA sequences to the big picture
© Gilbert and Fraser. 2015
Published: 29 August 2015
Fifteen years after the complete sequencing of the human genome, our understanding of how that sequence information is packaged within the cell nucleus and the significance of that packaging to the proper spatial and temporal regulation of gene expression is still poorly understood. While the breakthroughs in understanding the first level of packaging, the nucleosome, occurred at the end of the twentieth century, higher levels of interphase chromatin packaging in cell nuclei have remained unverifiable. Researchers had to rely on a combination of microscopic methods to either look anonymously at chromatin by electron or light microscopy or examine the spatial arrangement of a few specific loci by fluorescence in situ hybridization . Mapping three dimensional structure onto the genome map remained a formidable gap. Recent advances in mapping the contact points between segments of chromatin in intact cells using variants of the chromatin conformation capture (3C) method have provided robust means to study large-scale chromatin folding, from multi-kilobase-scale loops that connect promoters and enhancers [2, 3], through the organization of megabase-scale chromosomal domains [4–6], to complete chromosome tertiary structures and inter-chromosomal interactions . This has permitted a fresh appreciation of how specific expression patterns correlate with, and in some cases depend upon, three dimensional structures [8–10]. This has been complemented by advances in microscope technology that have dramatically increased the resolution available in 3D FISH approaches .
This special issue of Genome Biology on the three dimensional organization of the nucleus highlights several new developments in 3D genome structure. A good overview of the field is provided in a high level review by Britta Bouwman and Wouter de Laat of the discoveries that have been made at various scales of analysis of chromatin interactions, from loops to topologically-associating domains, and sub-nuclear compartments . A review by Chang Liu and Detlef Weigel discusses higher order chromosome structure in plants and the similarities to, and some fundamental differences from, the situation in mammalian cells . Ferhat Ay and William Noble outline the computational methods that have been developed to analyze the genome-wide derivative of 3C, Hi-C . Also on the theme of methods, in a research paper in this issue, Nagano et al., systematically compare Hi-C results using different ligation modes .
Essential to the three dimensional organization of chromatin are the machineries that process the genetic information: replication, recombination, repair, transcription and RNA processing machineries. Understanding how the 3D organization of chromatin influences, and is influenced by, these machineries is likely central to our understanding of how cells access and interpret genetic information. In particular, with the wealth of new transcriptome and epigenomic data, an important goal has been to determine which putative functional elements interact with which outputs. For example, linking promoters to their regulatory enhancers is central to understanding transcriptional regulation and to link GWAS SNPs found in regulatory elements to the affected genes [16, 17]. In this regard, Fortin and Hansen  and Huang et al.  introduce novel methods to predict chromosome organization from a set of epigenetic chromatin marks, while Sahlén et al. introduce a method to identify enhancer-promoter interactions by capturing the sequences from Hi-C libraries that are specific to promoters (HiCap) , focusing the dataset on sequences that interact with promoters.
In female mammals, one of the two X chromosomes is almost completely inactivated to balance the double dose of the genes on this chromosome as compared to males. As part of this silencing process, the inactive X takes on a very unusual compact structure that is explored in a series of papers. Philip Avner and colleagues provide a review of what is known about Xist, the lncRNA mediating inactivation . Deng et al. explore the bipartite structure of the inactivated X chromosome , and Marks et al. investigate the time course of inactivation of specific genes during differentiation . Together these studies link structure to function during dosage compensation.
The issue also contains a series of articles highlighting other aspects of the three dimensional ‘nucleome’. A pair of research articles illustrates how these three dimensional concepts are put into a functional context to regulate transcription. Rafique et al. report on estrogen-induced changes in chromatin architecture , and Pugacheva et al. show how BORIS cooperates with its paralog CTCF to shape gene expression and chromatin architecture in cancer cells and germ cells . Understanding how chromatin is organized in three dimensions in the nucleus has opened new avenues for understanding how double stranded DNA breaks are repaired, and Burman et al. introduce new high-throughput microscopy approach to detect chromosomal translocations resulting from aberrant repair of DNA breaks . Finally, Susan Gasser and colleagues review what is among the most prominent and well-studied geographical landmarks in the nucleus, the nuclear lamina, and how chromosomes associate with this structure .
It has long been known that the simple linear model of genes on a chromosome, activated by upstream promoters, is not the complete picture of gene control. The recent explosion of 3C and Hi-C data, and 3D FISH, is beginning to show us the complexity of how genes, regulatory elements and chromosomes interact. As ever, with a new technology, the excitement of the new results is tempered by the realization of its limitations and how little we still know. Genome Biology is excited to publish this special issue now, and looks forward to publishing related articles in the future that build on the platform provided by these and other studies to refine our knowledge of the organization of the nucleus and its impact on genome function.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Volpi EV, Bridger JM. FISH glossary: an overview of the fluorescence in situ hybridization technique. Biotechniques. 2008;45:385–409.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hughes JR, Roberts N, McGowan S, Hay D, Giannoulatou E, Lynch M, et al. Analysis of hundreds of cis-regulatory landscapes at high resolution in a single, high-throughput experiment. Nat Genet. 2014;46:205–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schoenfelder S, Furlan-Magaril M, Mifsud B, Tavares-Cadete F, Sugar R, Javierre B-M, et al. The pluripotent regulatory circuitry connecting promoters to their long-range interacting elements. Genome Res. 2015;25:582–97.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nora EP, Lajoie BR, Schulz EG, Giorgetti L, Okamoto I, Servant N, et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature. 2012;485:381–5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sexton T, Yaffe E, Kenigsberg E, Bantignies F, Leblanc B, Hoichman M, et al. Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell. 2012;148:458–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dixon JR, Selvaraj S, Yue F, Kim A, Li Y, Shen Y, et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature. 2012;485:376–80.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nagano T, Lubling Y, Stevens TJ, Schoenfelder S, Yaffe E, Dean W, et al. Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature. 2013;502:59–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fanucchi S, Shibayama Y, Burd S, Weinberg MS, Mhlanga MM. Chromosomal contact permits transcription between coregulated genes. Cell. 2013;155:606–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deng W, Rupon JW, Krivega I, Breda L, Motta I, Jahn KS, et al. Reactivation of developmentally silenced globin genes by forced chromatin looping. Cell. 2014;158:849–60.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lupiáñez DG, Kraft K, Heinrich V, Krawitz P, Brancati F, Klopocki E, et al. Disruptions of Topological Chromatin Domains Cause Pathogenic Rewiring of Gene-Enhancer Interactions. Cell. 2015;161:1012–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cattoni DI, Valeri A, Le Gall A, Nollmann M. A matter of scale: how emerging technologies are redefining our view of chromosome architecture. Trends Genet. 2015;31:454–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bouwman BA, de Laat W. Getting the genome in shape: the formation of loops, domains and compartments. Genome Biology. 16:154.Google Scholar
- Liu C, Weigel D: Chromatin in 3D: Progress and Prospects for Plants. Genome Biology. 16:170.Google Scholar
- Ay F, Noble, WS: Analysis methods for studying the 3D architecture of the genome. Genome Biology. doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0745-7.
- Nagano T, Varnai C, Schoenfelder S, Javierre B-M, Wingett SW, Fraser P: Comparison of Hi-C results using in-solution versus in-nucleus ligation. Genome Biology. 16:175Google Scholar
- Maurano MT, Humbert R, Rynes E, Thurman RE, Haugen E, Wang H, et al. Systematic localization of common disease-associated variation in regulatory DNA. Science. 2012;337:1190–5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mifsud B, Tavares-Cadete F, Young AN, Sugar R, Schoenfelder S, Ferreira L, et al. Mapping long-range promoter contacts in human cells with high-resolution capture Hi-C. Nat Genet. 2015;47:598–606.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fortin J-P, Hansen KD: Reconstructing A/B compartments as revealed by Hi-C using long-range correlations in epigenetic data. Genome Biology. doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0741-y.
- Huang J, Marco E, Pinello L, Yuan G-C: Predicting chromatin interactions using histone. Genome Biology. 16:162.Google Scholar
- Sahlen P, Abdullayev I, Ramsköld D, Matskova L, Rilakovic N, Lödstedt B, et al. Genome-wide mapping of promoter-anchored interactions with close to single-enhancer resolution. Genome Biol. 2015;16:156.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cerase A, Pintacuda G, Tattermusch A, Avner P: Xist localization and function: new insights from multiple levels. Genome Biology. 16:166Google Scholar
- Deng X, Ma W, Ramani V, Hill A, Yang F, Ay F, et al. Bipartite structure of the inactive mouse X chromosome. Genome Biol. 2015;16:152.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marks H, Kerstens H, Barakat T, Splinter E, Dirks R, van Mierlo G, et al. Dynamics of gene silencing during X inactivation using allele-specific RNA-seq. Genome Biol. 2015;16:149.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rafique S, Thomas J, Sproul D, Bickmore W. Estrogen-induced chromatin decondensation and nuclear re-organization linked to regional epigenetic regulation in breast cancer. Genome Biol. 2015;16:145.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pugacheva EM, Rivero Hinojosa S, Espinoza CA, Mendez-Catala CF, Kang S, Suzuki T, et al: Comparative analyses of CTCF and BORIS occupancies uncover two distinct classes of CTCF binding genomic regions. Genome Biology. 2015;16:161.Google Scholar
- Burman B, Misteli T, Pegoraro G. Quantitative detection of rare interphase chromosome breaks and translocations by high-throughput imaging. Genome Biol. 2015;16:146.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mattout A, Cabianca DS, Gasser SM: Chromatin states and nuclear organization in development: a view from the nuclear lamina. Genome Biology. 2015;16:174.Google Scholar