- Research news
- Open Access
Transcription factors link rhizobia, legumes
© BioMed Central Ltd 2005
- Published: 21 June 2005
- Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus
- Model Legume
- GRAS Protein
- Plant Transcription Factor
- Epidermal Root Cell
Scientists have identified two putative plant transcription factors that are essential links in the symbiosis of rhizobial bacteria and legumes, according to two reports in this week's Science. The transcription factors–GRAS family proteins NSP1 and NSP2–may play distinct yet cooperative roles in regulating the development of nodules on the plant roots where the nitrogen-fixing bacteria reside.
"The interesting aspect of this is that we have a couple of GRAS proteins here that are fairly well positioned in the signaling pathway with clear phenotypic effects," Michael Udvardi, of the Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Golm, Germany, and coauthor of a Perspective accompanying the studies, told The Scientist.
Legumes initiate the symbiotic relationship between bacteria and plant by emitting flavonoid compounds that are recognized by the bacteria. Rhizobia then produce Nod factors, oligosaccharides that elicit dramatic alterations in the gene expression and metabolism of both organisms. In the past few years, scientists have identified genes for "the small set of key regulators"–including a Nod factor receptor and possible plastid cation channels–in the initial steps of symbiosis, according to Ton Bisseling at Wageningen University, the Netherlands, coauthor of one of the papers. But for the first time, researchers have identified players at the first step that is specific to the rhizobia/legume interaction—what the authors of the second paper call Nod factor response factors.
Previous studies had demonstrated that nsp1 and nsp2 mutants were unable to produce the burst of gene expression that usually follows Nod factor stimulation and calcium spiking in epidermal root cells. The two teams used map-based cloning in the model legume Medicago truncatula to identify genes encoding the putative transcription factors NSP1 and NSP2.
According to the reports, the findings were consistent with earlier evidence that related proteins in the GRAS family are known to regulate transcription in other plants and contain structural elements–including leucine-rich regions and homopolymeric stretches in the N-terminal region–often found in transcriptional regulators.
Using green fluorescence protein tagging, the authors found that NSP1 and NSP2 localized to the nucleus, where they compensated for the nodulation defects in nsp1 and nsp2 mutants. That placed the proteins near the nuclear calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CCaMK), which is known to act upstream, and to potential DNA targets. The authors conclude that this localization implies roles in calcium transduction for NSP1, which is constitutively active, and for NSP2, which shifts to the nucleus from the nuclear envelope.
It will now be important to look for "interactions between key regulators," such as the genes "directly activated by NSP1 and 2" and the potential dimer interaction of the proteins, Bisseling said in an E-mail. According to Udvardi, the next steps in this research will also involve "deciphering the subsequent changes" in the plant's gene expression, which he said "is more difficult genetically because of pleiotropic effects downstream." The next wave of genetic tools–functional genomics approaches such as DNA profiling assays–will be crucial to complement classic methods, he said.
Udvardi said the implications of the studies may go beyond legumes. Though legumes are the only plants that use rhizobia for their nitrogen fixing needs, 90% of land plants have been using part of the same signaling pathway for the past 460 million years to get help from arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in obtaining phosphate and water from the soil, he said. And less than 20 million years ago, plant nematodes appropriated the same pathway elements to invade legumes.
According to David Bird of North Carolina State's Center for the Biology of Nematode Parasitism, who did not participate in this study, a paper he coauthored earlier this year suggests that these parasites may even have acquired genes directly from Rhizobia through horizontal transfer. The imminent completion of model legume genome sequencing projects–by this year or the next, according to Bird–mean that discoveries made here could quickly be transferable to other plant species, Udvardi said.
- Michael Udvardi, [http://www.mpimp-golm.mpg.de/leute/udvardi.html]
- M.K. Udvardi, W.R. Scheible, "GRAS genes and the symbiotic green revolution," Science, 308(5729):1749–50, June 17, 2005.Google Scholar
- A. Constans, "Giving a Nod2 the right target," The Scientist, Feb. 14, 2005., [http://www.the-scientist.com/2005/2/14/24/1]
- E. Limpens et al., "LysM domain receptor kinases regulating rhizobial Nod factor-induced infection," Science, 302(5645):630–3, 2003. Google Scholar
- H. Imaizumi-Anraku et al., "Plastid proteins crucial for symbiotic fungal and bacterial entry into plant roots," Nature, 433(7025):527–31, Feb. 3, 2005.Google Scholar
- Ton Bisseling, [http://www.mscwu.nl/tbisseling.htm]
- P. Smit et al., "NSP1 of the GRAS protein family is essential for rhizobial Nod factor-induced transcription," Science, 308(5729):1789–91, June 17, 2005.Google Scholar
- P. Kalo et al., "Nodulation signaling in legumes requires NSP2, a member of the GRAS family of transcriptional regulators," Science, 308(5729):1786–9, June 17, 2005.Google Scholar
- G.E. Oldroyd, S.R. Long, "Identification and characterization of nodulation-signaling pathway 2, a gene of Medicago truncatula involved in Nod actor signaling," Plant Physiol, 131(3):1027–32, 2003.Google Scholar
- M. Anderson, "Whisper down the vine: Plant communication," The Scientist, July 14, 2003., [http://www.the-scientist.com/2003/7/14/20/1]
- David Bird, [http://www.cals.ncsu.edu:8050/plantpath/people/faculty/bird/]
- R.R. Weerasinghe et al., "Root-knot nematodes and bacterial Nod factors elicit common signal transduction in Lotus japonicus," PNAS, 102: 3147–52, Feb. 22, 2005.Google Scholar