|
Phenotype
|
Up-regulated (q > 0.6) isogroups (isotigs)
|
Isogroups with recognized homologs
|
Isogroups with annotated homologs
|
Down-regulated (q > 0.6) isogroups (isotigs)
|
Isogroups with recognized homologs
|
Isogroups with annotated homologs
|
|---|
|
Queen
|
47 (67)
|
39 (82.9%)
|
20 (42.5%)
|
402 (522)
|
63
|
38
|
|
Worker
|
2,222 (2,924)
|
412 (18.5%)
|
238 (10.7%)
|
84 (109)
|
65
|
38
|
|
Foundress
|
11 (15)
|
8 (72.7%)
|
4 (36.4%)
|
2,389 (3,340)
|
776
|
507
|
|
Callow
|
162 (238)
|
142 (87.6%)
|
112 (69.1%)
|
1,454 (1,779)
|
322
|
194
|
|
Total
|
2,442 (3,244)
|
596 (24.4%)
|
370 (15.2%)
|
4,329 (5,750)
|
1,311
|
858
|
- We show the number of isogroups and isotigs found as differentially expressed by NOISeq at a threshold q > 0.6; number and percentage of differentially expressed genes with significant homologs recognized in GenBank non-redundant databases; the number and percentage of annotated homologs; and values across all castes are given in the final row of the table. Distribution of up-regulated isogroups, recognized homologs and annotated homologs are highly significantly different between queens and workers (chi-square test; respective chi-square values: 1,566 (1d.f.), P < 2.2e-16; 4,795 (1d.f.), P = 9.1 × 10-13; 5,382 (1d.f.), P < 2.2e-16).
