- Open Access
Transcriptional slippage in bacteria: distribution in sequenced genomes and utilization in IS element gene expression
© Baranov et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
- Received: 27 August 2004
- Accepted: 25 January 2005
- Published: 15 February 2005
Transcription slippage occurs on certain patterns of repeat mononucleotides, resulting in synthesis of a heterogeneous population of mRNAs. Individual mRNA molecules within this population differ in the number of nucleotides they contain that are not specified by the template. When transcriptional slippage occurs in a coding sequence, translation of the resulting mRNAs yields more than one protein product. Except where the products of the resulting mRNAs have distinct functions, transcription slippage occurring in a coding region is expected to be disadvantageous. This probably leads to selection against most slippage-prone sequences in coding regions.
To find a length at which such selection is evident, we analyzed the distribution of repetitive runs of A and T of different lengths in 108 bacterial genomes. This length varies significantly among different bacteria, but in a large proportion of available genomes corresponds to nine nucleotides. Comparative sequence analysis of these genomes was used to identify occurrences of 9A and 9T transcriptional slippage-prone sequences used for gene expression.
IS element genes are the largest group found to exploit this phenomenon. A number of genes with disrupted open reading frames (ORFs) have slippage-prone sequences at which transcriptional slippage would result in uninterrupted ORF restoration at the mRNA level. The ability of such genes to encode functional full-length protein products brings into question their annotation as pseudogenes and in these cases is pertinent to the significance of the term 'authentic frameshift' frequently assigned to such genes.
- Down Syndrome
- Codon Usage
- Additional Data File
- Bacterial Genome
- Comparative Sequence Analysis
During transcription, RNA polymerase catalyzes incorporation of nucleotides into growing RNA chains on the basis of complementarity to the DNA template. While transcribing long poly(A) or poly(T) tracts, however, slippage or 'stuttering' (also known as pseudo-templated transcription) occurs, with the resulting incorporation of one or more extra nucleotides or occasional lack of a base or two corresponding to the run of repeat bases. Transcription slippage was first reported from in vitro studies , and investigated in vivo later . Although sequences that are able to cause efficient transcriptional slippage occur infrequently in genomic DNA, they have been found and a functional role has been assigned to some of them. For example, transcription slippage is utilized for regulation of the Escherichia coli pyrBI and codBA operons and occurs shortly after transcription initiation when special conditions apply [3, 4].
When a transcription slippage-prone ('slippery') sequence occurs in a coding sequence, the mRNA products are heterogeneous. In such an mRNA population, the sequence downstream of a slippery pattern generally occurs in all three different reading phases relative to the reading frame 5' of the slippage-prone sequence. Translation of these mRNAs yields protein products that differ in their amino-acid sequence downstream of the slippery sequence. For genes encoding a single functional protein product, the presence of slippery sequences is expected to be detrimental, as it is likely to squander cellular resources to synthesize unwanted, or in some instances even deleterious, products. Aberrant forms of beta-amyloid precursor protein and ubiquitin B found in Alzheimer's and Down syndrome patients are associated with molecular misreading, whose mechanism is likely to be transcriptional slippage . Moreover, this type of molecular misreading was suggested to be relevant to the aging process [6–8]. Transcriptional slippage in the human APC gene (in addition to replicational slippage ) has also been proposed as a cause of colorectal cancer .
There are, however, at least two situations where transcriptional slippage inside a coding region can be advantageous. One is where a frameshift mutation occurs in the coding sequence and transcription slippage at a nearby site permits synthesis of a proportion of mRNAs in which a non-templated nucleotide(s) compensates for this mutation, thereby restoring the original framing. An example involving a single nucleotide deletion occurs in apoB, the human gene in which defects cause familial hypobetalipoproteinemia. In addition to encoding the expected truncated dysfunctional product, about a tenth of the product is full length as a result of its mRNA template having an extra A inserted in a run of eight As [11, 12]. A similar situation was recently reported for the canine AP3B1 gene .
A second situation in which transcription slippage has a positive outcome is when it leads to synthesis of more than one useful product from a single gene - during expression of the P gene in paramyxoviruses, for example. The best-studied example is in Sendai virus, where a specific number of untemplated Gs are inserted at the position corresponding to the slippery site (reviewed in ). Remarkably, this process depends on a hexanucleotide phasing of the slippery sequence relative to the end of genome and this is modulated by viral protein N . In addition to its involvement in paramyxovirus decoding, transcriptional slippage is used for the synthesis of additional functional proteins in other viruses, such as Ebola virus [16–18].
Another example of the use of transcriptional slippage was recently reported in the decoding of the Shigella flexneri mxiE gene which encodes a transcription activator . mxiE consists of two overlapping open reading frames (ORFs), mxiEa and mxiEb. Transcriptional insertion of an additional non-templated nucleotide at the run of Us results in a proportion of the mRNAs having mxiEa and mxiEb in the same reading frame . Therefore, in contrast to T. thermophilus dnaX transcriptional slippage, where the novel product is shorter than the product of standard decoding, mxiE transcriptional slippage is required for synthesis of the longer protein product.
Transcription slippage-prone sequences are expected to be under-represented in coding regions , because functional utilization of such sequences is unlikely to be common. The recent dramatic increase in the number of sequenced bacterial genomes provides an opportunity to perform wide-scale analysis of whole kingdoms of life . The current study explores whether long runs of As or Ts are indeed avoided in the coding regions of 108 sequenced bacterial genomes, and where such runs do occur, whether they play a positive functional role in gene expression.
Distribution of homopolymeric A and T runs in bacterial genomes
If any sequence pattern is randomly distributed in a genomic sequence, the following equation should be satisfied:
Comparison of poly(A) and poly(T) occurrence in genomic sequences versus coding regions has two disadvantages. First, runs of As cannot be discriminated from runs of Ts at the level of genomic sequences. Second, such runs could have a positive or negative role(s) outside of coding regions. For example, long runs of Ts can serve as parts of transcriptional terminators, although poly(T) runs do not have to be uninterrupted for this purpose . In addition, the occurrence of A and T runs can be affected by dinucleotide bias, codon usage and amino-acid composition of encoding proteins.
To minimize the influence of these factors on our analysis, we used another approach to estimate the distribution of such patterns. A thousand random genomes were generated for every genome shown in Figure 2a using the following rules: protein sequences from the real genomes were preserved, but the codons encoding the amino acids were randomized, taking into account codon usage. Such random genomes are relieved of selective pressure to avoid slippery sequences. A similar approach was previously used for statistical analysis of frameshift-inducing patterns in E. coli  and secondary RNA structures in bacterial genomes . In addition, we used randomization approaches that preserved dinucleotide bias and both dinucleotide bias and codon usage using the DiShuffle and CodonDishuffle programs developed by Katz and Burge . Figure 2b shows the distribution of A/T runs in such random genomes compared to the real genomes. If there were no selective pressure on a particular pattern, its occurrence in random genomes would be similar to its occurrence in a corresponding real genome. If there were negative selection against a particular pattern, it would occur more frequently in random genomes than in real ones. This analysis confirmed our general conclusion that runs of As and Ts of a certain length are avoided in some prokaryotic genomes, but the length of the pattern that is likely to be harmful varies among different genomes. Consequently, such patterns are significantly under-represented in AT-rich genomes.
Interestingly, in the genome of Wigglesworthia glossinidia, A/T patterns of any length occur with the same frequency in coding and noncoding regions, suggesting that transcriptional slippage is not possible in this species at patterns of any length. However, when the occurrence of such patterns is compared with their occurrence in random genomes, a negative selection is evident for patterns of exceptional length. This suggests that very long patterns have a negative effect not associated with transcriptional slippage.
Functional roles of transcriptional slippage
The remaining pool of genes contained some identical genes. Some of these exist in multiple copies inside the same genome whereas others are identical because they derived from genomes of highly related species. Such identical genes were combined to reduce redundancy. In the list of these genes (2) only one representative is given for each group of identical genes. The products of those genes that can be generated by transcriptional slippage were compared to each other using tBLASTn , and to those derived from other sequences present in sequenced bacterial genomes. Genes that produced no significant sequence similarity were considered as ORFans [34, 35]. Since ORFans are not suitable for comparative analysis, they were excluded from further analysis (shown in gray in 2). The number of gene groups for which homologs were found is 53.
The likelihood of functional utilization of transcriptional slippage was estimated using comparative sequence analysis. According to the scheme utilized (Figure 4), we consider transcriptional slippage patterns likely to be functional if the organization of ORFs fused by transcriptional slippage is the same in at least two non-identical sequences sharing significant sequence similarity. We have not found evidence of functional utilization of transcriptional slippage for 40 cases (shown in blue in 2). Most probably, although transcriptional slippage is likely to occur during expression of these genes, it has no significant detrimental effect. This result is consistent with our previous finding that sequences that direct significant levels of frameshifting in the E. coli genome may occur without apparent function . Six cases were found where protein products expressed by transcriptional slippage have homologs encoded in a single ORF in genes from other species.
Transcriptional slippage was recently found in the S. flexneri pathogenicity-encoding plasmid that carries the mxiE gene ; it is not included in the 108 sequences of complete genomes downloaded for the present study (even though the chromosomal sequence was included).
We have obtained an initial view of the distribution and functional utilization of simple transcriptional slippage sites in bacterial genomes performed on a multiple-genome scale. The data obtained demonstrate that runs of As and Ts, which result in efficient transcriptional slippage, are significantly underrepresented in coding regions of AT-rich genomes. One likely reason for this underrepresentation is the 'slippery' nature of such sites. In addition to transcriptional slippage, these sequences are likely to be hypermutable as a result of slippage during replication. This also contributes to negative selection against these sequences. It has previously been shown that in eukaryotes short repetitive sequences of specific length are usually under-represented in coding regions compared to noncoding regions . The implication is that such sequences are susceptible to frameshift errors at the DNA level. We cannot distinguish whether the reason for negative selection against A or T runs is slippage at the replication or transcriptional level or at both. Our approach to finding genes where transcriptional slippage is functionally utilized can, however, discriminate it from replicational slippage in some instances. Since we deal with those cases where sequence extension after a slippery pattern in a shifted reading frame is conserved among several homologs, it is very likely that this extension is expressed. Theoretically, its expression can be achieved as a result of replicational and/or transcriptional slippage. In the first case, the result would be the existence of a population of bacteria with heterogeneous genomes where different members of such a population would have a different number of nucleotides within a repetitive run, as previously described for several occurrences in the Campylobacter jejuni . We have found several such examples for the group of genes that we classified as 'pseudo pseudogenes' (an example is in Figure 5).
In general, a conserved run of As or Ts in several homologs does not imply that replication slippage is impossible on such a run. For example, when insertion of an additional nucleotide is deleterious, there will be selection against sequences with the additional nucleotide. However, in this case such replicational slippage cannot be referred to as being functional.
The comparative sequence analysis of genes with runs of nine As and Ts from genomes where such repeat bases are slippage-prone, revealed S. aureus mapW as a candidate for functional utilization of transcriptional slippage. mapW belongs to a group of map genes encoding MHC class II (major histocompatibility complex class II)-like proteins. mapW consists of two ORFs and it was proposed earlier that they can be expressed together to produce a full-length 'fusion' protein . Perhaps the ability of S. aureus to encode MHC-II like proteins with variable length can facilitate survival in mammals of varied genetic backgrounds . However, the presence of mapW genes with an uninterrupted ORF in some S. aureus strains suggests that replicational slippage can be also utilized in this case.
The largest group of functionally utilized transcriptional slippage sites belongs to mobile IS elements. We have found patterns of 9 As in 27 IS elements from the following organisms - Deinococcus radiodurans, Mesorhizobium loti, Nostoc sp. PCC 7120, Streptococcus pyogenes and Sulfolobus solfataricus. Interestingly, some homologous IS elements from D. radiodurans and Nostoc sp. PCC 7120 have 8As instead of 9As in the same location. This suggests that in these organisms, transcriptional slippage is productive even on eight As. Figure 6 illustrates codon alignment of homologous IS elements from D. radiodurans. It is clear that the stretch of As is evolutionally preserved among these IS elements (although its length varies, there is no deletion or insertions) and their ORF organization suggests that runs of As are used to produce ORF fusions. (A high-resolution FITC mass spectrometric analysis of numerous tryptic peptides from D. radiodurans has been performed by Smith and colleagues . A preliminary analysis of these data is revealing products of IS element mRNAs synthesized via transcriptional slippage (R. Smith, P.V.B., A.W.H, J.Z, R.F.G. and J.F.A, unpublished results) Alignment of IS elements from Nostoc is not shown, as all its elements are identical except for the length of the poly(A) run varying from 8 to 10 As. Many IS elements encode their transposase in two overlapping ORFs, orfA and orfB. Synthesis of a fused ORFA-ORFB product is required for transposition. The most common known mechanism for synthesis of ORFA-ORFB fusion is -1 ribosomal frameshifting (see [41–44] for reviews). Transcriptional slippage has, however, been proposed previously as an alternative mechanism for one IS element . The present study has identified a number of IS elements utilizing transcriptional slippage for synthesis of their ORFA-ORFB fusion. Therefore transcriptional slippage can be considered as a common mechanism for IS element expression.
In addition, we have found a set of pseudo pseudogenes where what is normally considered as a frameshift mutation extends a non-slippery pattern of 8 As to the slippage-prone sequence of 9 As. As a result, such a frameshift mutation does not lead to full inactivation of a gene that normally could be annotated as a pseudogene, as a normal functional product is still produced. The advantage of the unusual decoding of these genes by transcriptional slippage, compared to standard decoding of wild-type counterparts, is uncertain. It is clear that such cases were generated by single mutations and they may, or may not, be present in different isolates from the same species. Transcriptional slippage can, however, be considered as functionally utilized, since if such genes were transcribed, a proportion of the mRNA synthesized should contain the intact coding information. This important consideration needs to be taken in account in genome annotation.
Although organism-specific utilization of transcriptional slippage cannot be ruled out, we have identified a large number of genes where, using comparative analysis, no apparent functional role can be assigned for transcriptional slippage. This result is parallel to our previous analysis of frameshift-inducing sequences in the E. coli K12 genome . It was shown that a significant level of frameshifting errors occur in many E. coli genes containing A_AAA_AAG sequences (codons are separated by underscoring), but no such sequences were found in highly expressed genes . Similar considerations can be applied here for transcriptional slippage. When erroneous nonstandard decoding occurs in genes that are not highly expressed, the cellular load is modest owing to the low level of aberrant product compared to the total protein mass. Such situations may be easily tolerated.
Transcriptional slippage motifs were found in many ORFans, but any functional purpose could not be assessed in the present study. We found runs of 9A or 9T in 48 ORFans. The origin(s) of ORFans is mysterious. While some of them are likely to be 'coincidental ORFs' or 'junk ORFans' which do not produce proteins under any conditions [45–47], many ORFans are likely to be real genes [36, 48, 49].
The analysis of transcriptional slippage in this study was limited to that occurring on 9As and 9Ts. It is clear, however, that the efficiency of transcriptional slippage on runs of As and Ts is highly organism dependent, and there are a number of bacteria in which transcriptional slippage may occur on runs of shorter length. In addition, transcriptional slippage patterns can occur on other nucleotide repeats. The simplest mechanism that can be proposed for transcriptional slippage is dissociation of the growing RNA chain from its DNA template while inside an open RNA polymerase complex, and subsequent re-association with the DNA template at a new location (Figure 7). On this basis, other repeat patterns of low complexity are likely to result in transcriptional slippage. For example, (AT)n may result in insertion of additional non-templated ATs. Transcriptional slippage sites can be also formed by combination of two relatively short homopolymeric patterns as in paramyxoviruses .
Analysis of A and T repeat distribution in bacterial genomes
Fasta files containing nucleotide sequences of entire bacterial genomes and nucleotide sequences of coding regions were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information ftp site  on 25 March, 2003. Occurrences of A and T runs with different lengths were calculated for each genome in the file containing genomic sequences (accession_number.fna) and in the files containing nucleotide sequences of coding ORFs (accession_number.ffn). The ratios of occurrences of runs of A and T between .fna files and .ffn files were calculated for every accession number and the data are summarized in 1.
Random genomes were generated for representative genomes as described in . In addition we applied DiShuffle and CodonDiShuffle programs provided by C. Burge . The ratios between occurrences of A and T runs in real genomes and the mean values for A and T runs in random genomes were further calculated.
Generation of novel protein sequences corresponding to those produced via transcriptional slippage
Runs of 9A or 9Ts were sought within coding regions of genomic sequences of completed bacterial genomes. To generate a novel in silico protein that can be produced by transcriptional slippage, one and two As or Ts were introduced into the pattern of 9As or 9Ts. The length of the resulting ORF in these sequences was compared to the ORF in the original sequences. Those sequences that contain ORFs longer than the original were selected for further analysis.
We are grateful to Chris Burge for providing us with source codes for the DiShuffle and DiCodonShuffle programs. We thank Norma Wills for her key role in the background work on which this study is based. The salary of J.F.A. was supported by NIH grant GM48152 and an award from Science Foundation Ireland. The salary of P.V.B. was supported by DOE grant DE-FG03-01ER63132 to R.F.G.
- Chamberlin M, Berg P: Deoxyribonucleic acid-directed synthesis of ribonucleic acid by an enzyme from Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1962, 48: 81-94.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wagner LA, Weiss RB, Driscoll R, Dunn DS, Gesteland RF: Transcriptional slippage occurs during elongation at runs of adenine or thymine in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990, 18: 3529-3535.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu C, Heath LS, Turnbough CL: Regulation of pyrBI operon expression in Escherichia coli by UTP-sensitive reiterative RNA synthesis during transcriptional initiation. Genes Dev. 1994, 8: 2904-2912.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Qi F, Turnbough CL: Regulation of codBA operon expression in Escherichia coli by UTP-dependent reiterative transcription and UTP-sensitive transcriptional start site switching. J Mol Biol. 1995, 254: 552-565. 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0638.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Leeuwen FW, de Kleijn DP, van den Hurk HH, Neubauer A, Sonnemans MA, Sluijs JA, Koycu S, Ramdjielal RD, Salehi A, Martens GJ, et al: Frameshift mutants of beta amyloid precursor protein and ubiquitin-B in Alzheimer's and Down patients. Science. 1998, 279: 242-247. 10.1126/science.279.5348.242.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martin GM, Bressler SL: Transcriptional infidelity in aging cells and its relevance for the Orgel hypothesis. Neurobiol Aging. 2000, 21: 897-900. 10.1016/S0197-4580(00)00193-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Leeuwen FW, Fischer DF, Kamel D, Sluijs JA, Sonnemans MA, Benne R, Swaab DF, Salehi A, Hol EM: Molecular misreading: a new type of transcript mutation expressed during aging. Neurobiol Aging. 2000, 21: 879-891. 10.1016/S0197-4580(00)00151-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Leeuwen FW: Neuropeptide research discloses part of the secrets of Alzheimer's disease neuropathogenesis: state of the art 2004. Neurosci Lett. 2004, 361: 124-127. 10.1016/j.neulet.2003.12.050.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Laken SJ, Petersen GM, Gruber SB, Oddoux C, Ostrer H, Giardiello FM, Hamilton SR, Hampel H, Markowitz A, Klimstra D, et al: Familial colorectal cancer in Ashkenazim due to a hypermutable tract in APC. Nat Genet. 1997, 17: 79-83. 10.1038/ng0997-79.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Raabe M, Linton MF, Young SG: Long runs of adenines and human mutations. Am J Med Genet. 1998, 76: 101-102. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19980226)76:1<101::AID-AJMG19>3.0.CO;2-P.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Linton MF, Pierotti V, Young SG: Reading-frame restoration with an apolipoprotein B gene frameshift mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992, 89: 11431-11435.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Linton MF, Raabe M, Pierotti V, Young SG: Reading-frame restoration by transcriptional slippage at long stretches of adenine residues in mammalian cells. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 14127-14132. 10.1074/jbc.272.22.14127.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Benson KF, Person RE, Li FQ, Williams K, Horwitz M: Paradoxical homozygous expression from heterozygotes and heterozygous expression from homozygotes as a consequence of transcriptional infidelity through a polyadenine tract in the AP3B1 gene responsible for canine cyclic neutropenia. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32: 6327-6333. 10.1093/nar/gkh974.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hausmann S, Garcin D, Delenda C, Kolakofsky D: The versatility of paramyxovirus RNA polymerase stuttering. J Virol. 1999, 73: 5568-5576.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Iseni F, Baudin F, Garcin D, Marq JB, Ruigrok RW, Kolakofsky D: Chemical modification of nucleotide bases and mRNA editing depend on hexamer or nucleoprotein phase in Sendai virus nucleocapsids. RNA. 2002, 8: 1056-1067. 10.1017/S1355838202029977.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Volchkov VE, Becker S, Volchkova VA, Ternovoj VA, Kotov AN, Netesov SV, Klenk HD: GP mRNA of Ebola virus is edited by the Ebola virus polymerase and by T7 and vaccinia virus polymerases. Virology. 1995, 214: 421-430. 10.1006/viro.1995.0052.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sanchez A, Trappier SG, Mahy BW, Peters CJ, Nichol ST: The virion glycoproteins of Ebola viruses are encoded in two reading frames and are expressed through transcriptional editing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996, 93: 3602-3607. 10.1073/pnas.93.8.3602.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Volchkov VE, Volchkova VA, Muhlberger E, Kolesnikova LV, Weik M, Dolnik O, Klenk HD: Recovery of infectious Ebola virus from complementary DNA: RNA editing of the GP gene and viral cytotoxicity. Science. 2001, 291: 1965-1969. 10.1126/science.1057269.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Larsen B, Wills NM, Nelson C, Atkins JF, Gesteland RF: Nonlinearity in genetic decoding: homologous DNA replicase genes use alternatives of transcriptional slippage or translational frameshifting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 1683-1688. 10.1073/pnas.97.4.1683.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yurieva O, Skangalis M, Kuriyan J, O'Donnell M: Thermus thermophilis dnaX homolog encoding gamma- and tau-like proteins of the chromosomal replicase. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 27131-27139. 10.1074/jbc.272.43.27131.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bullard JM, Williams JC, Acker WK, Jacobi C, Janjic N, McHenry CS: DNA polymerase III holoenzyme from Thermus thermophilus identification, expression, purification of components, and use to reconstitute a processive replicase. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 13401-13408. 10.1074/jbc.M110833200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Flower AM, McHenry CS: The gamma subunit of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme of Escherichia coli is produced by ribosomal frameshifting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990, 87: 3713-3717.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tsuchihashi Z, Kornberg A: Translational frameshifting generates the gamma subunit of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990, 87: 2516-2520.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blinkowa AL, Walker JR: Programmed ribosomal frameshifting generates the Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III gamma subunit from within the tau subunit reading frame. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990, 18: 1725-1729.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blinkowa AL, Walker JR: Programmed ribosomal frameshifting generates the Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III gamma subunit from within the tau subunit reading frame. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990, 18: 1725-1729.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baranov PV, Gesteland RF, Atkins JF: Recoding: translational bifurcations in gene expression. Gene. 2002, 286: 187-201. 10.1016/S0378-1119(02)00423-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Penno C, Sansonetti P, Parsot C: Frameshifting by transcriptional slippage is involved in production of MxiE, the transcription activator regulated by the activity of the type III secretion apparatus in Shigella flexneri. Mol Microbiol. 2005, Google Scholar
- Wheeler DL, Church DM, Edgar R, Federhen S, Helmberg W, Madden TL, Pontius JU, Schuler GD, Schriml LM, Sequeira E, et al: Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information: update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, D35-D40. 10.1093/nar/gkh073.Google Scholar
- Field D, Wills C: Abundant microsatellite polymorphism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and the different distributions of microsatellites in eight prokaryotes and S. cerevisiae, result from strong mutation pressures and a variety of selective forces. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998, 95 (4): 1647-1652. 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1647.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wilson KS, von Hippel PH: Transcription termination at intrinsic terminators: the role of the RNA hairpin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995, 92: 8793-8797.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gurvich OL, Baranov PV, Zhou J, Hammer AW, Gesteland RF, Atkins JF: Sequences that direct significant levels of frameshifting are frequent in coding regions of Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 2003, 22: 5941-5950. 10.1093/emboj/cdg561.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Katz L, Burge CB: Widespread selection for local RNA secondary structure in coding regions of bacterial genes. Genome Res. 2003, 13: 2042-2051. 10.1101/gr.1257503.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ: Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990, 215: 403-410. 10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fischer D, Eisenberg D: Finding families for genomic ORFans. Bioinformatics. 1999, 15: 759-762. 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.9.759.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Siew N, Azaria Y, Fischer D: The ORFanage: an ORFan database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, D281-D283. 10.1093/nar/gkh116.Google Scholar
- Metzgar D, Bytof J, Wills C: Selection against frameshift mutations limits microsatellite expansion in coding DNA. Genome Res. 2000, 10: 72-80.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Parkhill J, Wren BW, Mungall K, Ketley JM, Churcher C, Basham D, Chillingworth T, Davies RM, Feltwell T, Holroyd S, et al: The genome sequence of the food-borne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni reveals hypervariable sequences. Nature. 2000, 403: 665-668. 10.1038/35001088.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kuroda M, Ohta T, Uchiyama I, Baba T, Yuzawa H, Kobayashi I, Cui L, Oguchi A, Aoki K, Nagai Y, et al: Whole genome sequencing of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet. 2001, 357: 1225-1240. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04403-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee LY, Miyamoto YJ, McIntyre BW, Hook M, McCrea KW, McDevitt D, Brown EL: The Staphylococcus aureus Map protein is an immunomodulator that interferes with T cell-mediated responses. J Clin Invest. 2002, 110: 1461-1471. 10.1172/JCI200216318.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lipton MS, Pasa-Tolic L, Anderson GA, Anderson DJ, Auberry DL, Battista JR, Daly MJ, Fredrickson J, Hixson KK, Kostandarithes H, et al: Global analysis of the Deinococcus radiodurans proteome by using accurate mass tags. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 11049-11054. 10.1073/pnas.172170199.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chandler M, Fayet O: Translational frameshifting in the control of transposition in bacteria. Mol Microbiol. 1993, 7: 497-503.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ohtsubo F, Sekine Y: Bacterial insertion sequences. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1996, 204: 1-26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Farabaugh PJ: Programmed Alternative Reading of the Genetic Code. 1997, Georgetown, TX: R.G. Landes CoView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mahillon J, Chandler M: Insertion sequences. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998, 62: 725-774.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dujon B, Alexandraki D, Andre B, Ansorge W, Baladron V, Ballesta JP, Banrevi A, Bolle PA, Bolotin-Fukuhara M, Bossier P, et al: Complete DNA sequence of yeast chromosome XI. Nature. 1994, 369: 371-378. 10.1038/369371a0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goffeau A, Barrell BG, Bussey H, Davis RW, Dujon B, Feldmann H, Galibert F, Hoheisel JD, Jacq C, Johnston M, et al: Life with 6000 genes. Science. 1996, 274: 546, 563-547. 10.1126/science.274.5287.546.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Monchois V, Abergel C, Sturgis J, Jeudy S, Claverie JM: Escherichia coli ykfE ORFan gene encodes a potent inhibitor of C-type lysozyme. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 18437-18441. 10.1074/jbc.M010297200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Daubin V, Ochman H: Bacterial genomes as new gene homes: the genealogy of ORFans in E. coli. Genome Res. 2004, 14: 1036-1042. 10.1101/gr.2231904.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Siew N, Fischer D: Twenty thousand ORFan microbial protein families for the biologist?. Structure. 2003, 11: 7-9. 10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00938-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peak IR, Jennings MP, Hood DW, Bisercic M, Moxon ER: Tetrameric repeat units associated with virulence factor phase variation in Haemophilus also occur in Neisseria spp. and Moraxella catarrhalis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1996, 137: 109-114. 10.1016/0378-1097(96)00048-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Karlin S, Mrazek J, Campbell AM: Compositional biases of bacterial genomes and evolutionary implications. J Bacteriol. 1997, 179: 3899-3913.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Roche RJ, Moxon ER: Phenotypic variation in Haemophilus influenzae: the interrelationship of colony opacity, capsule and lipopolysaccharide. Microb Pathog. 1995, 18: 129-140. 10.1016/S0882-4010(95)90117-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- NCBI ftp site. [ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/Bacteria/]
- Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG: The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 4876-4882. 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.