Skip to main content
  • Protein family review
  • Published:

The annexins


Annexins are traditionally thought of as calcium-dependent phospholipid-binding proteins, but recent work suggests a more complex set of functions. More than a thousand proteins of the annexin superfamily have been identified in major eukaryotic phyla, but annexins are absent from yeasts and prokaryotes. The unique annexin core domain is made up of four similar repeats approximately 70 amino acids long, each of which usually contains a characteristic 'type 2' motif for binding calcium ions. Animal and fungal annexins also have non-homologous amino-terminal domains of varying length and sequence, which are responsible for the distinct localizations and specialized functions of the proteins through post-translational modification and binding to other proteins. Annexins interact with various cell-membrane components that are involved in the structural organization of the cell, intracellular signaling by enzyme modulation and ion fluxes, growth control, and they can act as atypical calcium channels. Analysis of site-specific conservation in the core domain suggests a role for certain buried residues in the calcium-channel activity of vertebrate annexins and in the structural stability of their core domains. Evolutionarily significant differences between subfamilies are preferentially localized to accessible sites on the protein surface that determine membrane binding and interactions with cytosolic proteins.

Gene organization and evolutionary history

Annexins were discovered approximately 25 years ago. The first to be described as an isolated, purified protein was human annexin A7 (then known as synexin) [1], and the first to be cloned were human annexins A1 and A2 (formerly known as lipocortin and calpactin respectively) [2, 3]. The name 'annexin' was proposed for the superfamily in 1990, and the 12 annexins common to vertebrates were recently classified in the annexin A family and named as annexins A1-A13 (or ANXA1-ANXA13), leaving A12 unassigned in the official nomenclature [4]. Annexins outside vertebrates are classified into families B (in invertebrates), C (in fungi and some groups of unicellular eukaryotes), D (in plants), and E (in protists); at least 40 additional subfamilies await formal classification into these families.

Most eukaryotic species have 1-20 annexin (ANX) genes (Table 1, Figure 1); even the primitive unicellular protist Giardia has at least seven (which are in the annexin E family) [5, 6]. The annexin genes have duplicated extensively and independently in several eukaryotic lineages, as seen from their molecular phylogeny, their gene structures and their chromosomal positions. Plant annexins (the D family) make up a monophyletic cluster whose members generally lack amino-terminal domains and functional calcium-binding sites in their second and third repeats [7] (see below). They originated approximately 1,000 million years ago from the one to three founding members in mosses, ferns and gymnosperms. Up to 17 additional gene subfamilies have emerged in flowering angiosperms as a result of gene or genome duplication events, accruing additional annexins in individual lineages (for example, one more in lilies and ten more in the barrel medic). The eight and nine annexin genes in the complete genomes of Arabidopsis and rice, respectively, include only two true orthologs; the rest are products of lineage-specific duplications after the separation of dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants about 200-250 million years ago.

Table 1 Annexin genes in different groups of organisms
Figure 1
figure 1

The phylogenetic distribution of annexins. A tree showing the classification of annexins into five families, ANXA to ANXE, which correspond with different eukaryotic lineages that originated at different periods over the past 1,200 million years (Mya, million years ago). Names of the vertebrate annexins are shown, but those of other members of the superfamily are omitted for simplicity.

The annexin C family consists of diverse members in unicellular organisms, represented by fungi, mycetozoa (slime molds) and the newly defined kingdom of chromalveolates (a grouping of chromist stramenopiles, including brown algae and diatoms, and alveolates, including ciliates and dinoflagellates). Individual species in these groups may have no annexins (yeasts), one to three (other fungi), or up to six (potato rot). Members of the annexin B family, found in both protostome and deuterostome invertebrates, have also undergone many lineage-specific duplications, leading to more than 20 subfamilies whose gene organization, protein structures and chromosomal maps differ between clades and from vertebrate annexins. Insect annexins exemplify the complex pattern of duplication and loss in individual lineages: tsetse flies and mosquitoes have four annexins, whereas Drosophila, honeybees and silkmoths have only three, of which only one or two are clear orthologs between species. The early-branching deuterostomes - sea urchins, tunicates and lancelets - have 5-12 annexins; these include close relatives of annexins A13, A7 and A11, the founder genes of vertebrate annexins [8, 9]. Although this establishes the invertebrate ancestry of vertebrate annexins, none of the 12 annexins in the vertebrate A family have (yet) been assigned a true invertebrate ortholog.

The vertebrate A family includes the 12 annexins that have been confirmed to make up the complete family in mammals, but the number of annexins may vary in other classes of vertebrates as genes have been gained and lost. Ancient polyploidization events in bony fish, and more recent genome duplications in pseudotetraploid frogs (Xenopus), have duplicated many of the annexin genes. Thus, annexin A1 has undergone two successive duplications to yield up to four copies in some fish, amphibians and birds. Mammalian ANXA6 is a compound gene, probably derived from the fusion of duplicated ANXA5 and ANXA10 genes in early vertebrate evolution (the two halves of the encoded protein are indicated as 5'ANX6 and 3'ANX6 in Figure 1). Annexins A7, A8 and A10 have not yet been detected in fish, although genes similar to annexin A7 have been found in earlier-diverging species such as the sea urchin, the earthworm and Hydra. The reasons for the tendency of annexin genes (or their chromosomal regions) to duplicate, their successful preservation, and the extent to which they contribute to vertebrate complexity are as yet unknown.

The 12 human annexin genes range in size from 15 kb (ANXA9) to 96 kb (ANXA10) and are dispersed throughout the genome on chromosomes 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10 and 15 [10]. Annexin genes from other vertebrates may vary slightly in size and chromosomal linkage, but orthologs are grossly similar in their sequence and splicing patterns (Figure 2a).

Figure 2
figure 2

Gene structures, protein domains and signature logos of vertebrate annexins. (a) The organization of the regions of family-A annexin genes encoding the core carboxy-terminal region. Exon numbers are shown above each gene; introns are indicated by vertical lines and homologous intron positions by dotted lines. The structures of the nine human annexin genes not shown are the same as that of ANXA11. ANXA13 is thought to have the gene structure closest to the ancestral vertebrate annexin gene; ANXA7 is intermediate between ANXA13 and the others, and most closely resembles ANXA11 in its amino-terminal half and ANXA13 in its carboxy-terminal half. (b) Annexin proteins generally consist of a unique amino-terminal region (of 0-191 amino acids in vertebrates, for example) and a carboxy-terminal 'core region' of four homologous repeats, each 68-69 amino acids long and containing five α helices and a type-2 calcium binding site with the sequence GxGT-[38 residues]-D/E. The indicated residues Glu89 and Arg265 are considered key components of the putative calcium channel function. (c) Sequence logo for the core domain of vertebrate annexins, derived from a hidden Markov model [11] generated from an alignment of 311 amino acids from 200 sequences representing the 12 subfamilies in 50 vertebrate species. The full height of each residue stack reflects the conservation level at that position; the height of symbols within the stack indicates the relative frequency of each amino acid [12]. The two parts of the calcium-binding motif (GxGT and D/E) are indicated by asterisks. The four repeats are aligned to the right on their calcium-binding motifs.

Characteristic structural features

All annexins share a core domain made up of four similar repeats, each approximately 70 amino acids long. Each repeat is made up of five α helices and usually contains a characteristic 'type 2' motif for binding calcium ions with the sequence 'GxGT-[38 residues]-D/E' (in the single-letter amino-acid code; see Figure 2b). Animal and fungal annexins also have variable amino-terminal domains.

Amino-acid site conservation in a sequence alignment of vertebrate annexins can be analyzed statistically using hidden Markov models [11, 12] to generate a signature logo [13, 14] (Figure 2c). The levels of conservation and the frequency of amino acids at each site reflect both evolutionary selection on the site and its functional importance. The similarity in sequence between individual repeats (especially repeats 2 and 4) is evident. The calcium-binding motif is most conserved in repeat 2; in annexin A10, the motif in repeat 2 is the only such motif. The exon splice patterns and alternating intron phases in annexin genes do not correspond to domains within the proteins, a feature that has effectively precluded exon shuffling. The high level of conservation of features such as the four carboxy-terminal repeats contrasts with unique amino termini in different annexins, and there are also smaller differences between them in specific parts of the proteins (Figure 3). Annexins bind to a wide variety of other proteins (Table 2). Many annexins have posttranslational modifications, such as phosphorylation and myristoylation (Figure 3); such modifications and surface remodeling of individual members presumably account for much of the subfamily specificity in annexin interactions. An intriguing, recurring connection between annexins and structural proteins, such as actin, is suggested by genetic anomalies such as the fusion in Drosophila of an annexin gene with a dynein intermediate-chain gene [15] and in Ciona intestinalis of a gene similar (on the basis of its exon-splicing pattern) to ANXA11 with an intermediate-filament gene [16, 17].

Figure 3
figure 3

Domain structures of representative annexin proteins. Orthologs of the 12 human annexins shown in other vertebrates have the same structures, with strict conservation of the four repeats in the core region (black) and variation in length and sequence in the amino-terminal regions (shaded). Human ANXA1 and ANXA2 are shown as dimers, with the member of the S100 protein family that they interact with. Domain structures for other model organisms are derived from public data made available by the relevant genome-sequencing projects. Features: S100Ax, sites for attachment of the indicated member of the S100 family of calcium-binding proteins; P, known phosphorylation sites; K, KGD synapomorphy (a conserved, inherited characteristic of proteins); I, codon insertions (+x denotes the number of codons inserted); S-A/b, nonsynonymous coding polymorphisms (SNPs) with the amino acid in the major variant (A) and that in the minor variant (b); N, putative nucleotide-binding sites; D, codon deletions (-x denotes the number of codons deleted); A, alternatively spliced exons; Myr, myristoylation. The total length of each protein is indicated on the right.

Table 2 Proteins that interact with vertebrate annexins

The core domains of most vertebrate annexins have been analyzed by X-ray crystallography, revealing conservation of their secondary and tertiary structures [1820] despite only 45-55% amino-acid identity among individual members. Each annexin repeat is folded into five α helices (Figure 2b,2c), and these in turn are wound into a right-handed super-helix. The four repeats pack into a structure that resembles a flattened disc, with a slightly convex surface on which the Ca2+-binding loops are located and a concave surface at which the amino and carboxyl termini come into close apposition (Figure 4). An innovative and powerful approach to associating protein structural domains with intrinsic function or functional divergence involves the incorporation of evolutionary information into three-dimensional models [2123]. The family sequence logo defines universally conserved sites (Figure 2), which can be mapped as a color or shading scheme onto the surface-exposed atoms of a crystallographic model [24] to reveal localized domains of probable relevance to the basic function of the protein (Figure 4a). A more complicated problem in the study of large protein families is the determination of which structural differences are responsible for functional specificity in each subfamily. Because functional constraint guides evolutionary selection, the sites that change in an evolutionarily significant way can be inferred to be responsible for functional divergence. Thus, shifts in site-specific evolutionary rates during speciation (computed from site variations in multiple sequence alignments derived from a broad range of species) or a conserved change in an amino-acid property at a critical location may consolidate a functional change at that site. We present such a comparative analysis of annexins A1, A2 and A5 (Figure 4b) to identify the sites at which each differs significantly from other annexins and which, in terms of evolutionary dynamics, may indicate a key structure-function adaptation. For example, annexin A2 orthologs incorporate additional basic residues into a group of amino acids (positions 48-56) that is accessible on the concave (cytosolic) face of the molecule (Figure 4b). The functional significance of this divergence is consistent with a possible nuclear-localization signal in annexin A2, although any such hypothesis requires empirical testing. An extreme case of adaptive evolution is that of annexin A9, an ancient duplicated relative of annexin A2, in which all four calcium-binding sites on the convex surface have been eradicated by evolutionary selection. Comparable divergence patterns in annexins A1 and A5, which are in distinct evolutionary clades of the A-family annexins, reveal patterns of structural divergence between subfamilies that localize principally to sites exposed on the protein surface that are most likely to be involved in intermolecular interactions, such as the KGD motif that is an inherited characteristic of the clade containing annexins A1, A2, and A9. These contrast with the universally conserved sites common to all annexins, which are confined to the central, interior portion of the molecule (Figure 4a). This approach, involving differentiation between universally conserved sites (important for the general function of a family) and discrete rate changes (which affect binding to other proteins and which may be responsible for the properties of individual annexins) may eventually help to resolve the molecular basis for the multifaceted functional profiles of individual annexin proteins.

Figure 4
figure 4

Surface mapping of important sites onto the three-dimensional structure of annexins. All panels show the crystal structure of the core region of the pig annexin A1 protein (Protein Data Bank code:1MCX [19]), viewed frontally (left) and laterally inverted (right) as a space-filling model rendered by the RasTop 2.0 version of RasMol [24]. Residues are numbered as in Figure 2, and the approximate positions of the conserved repeats are indicated with Roman numerals. (a) Functionally important sites common to all annexins. The level of evolutionary conservation in clusters of residues is indicated by lighter or darker shading. This is derived from a maximum-likelihood analysis of a multiple sequence alignment from 200 vertebrate A-family annexins using CONSURF [22, 23] NT, amino terminus. (b) Sites that are functionally divergent between annexin subfamilies are shown with different shading for ANXA1, ANXA2 or ANXA5, three annexins for which the differences are especially significant. The sites were assessed by 'rate-shift analysis' of subfamily sequence alignments using DIVERGE [21] RATE4SITE and CONSURF [22, 23]. Calcium atoms are indicated by Ca.

Localization and function

Annexins are generally cytosolic proteins, with pools of both a soluble form and a form stably or reversibly associated with components of the cytoskeleton or proteins that mediate interactions between the cell and the extracellular matrix (matricellular proteins). Some, such as annexins A11 and A2, have been found in the nucleus under particular circumstances [25, 26]. In certain instances, annexins may be expressed at the cell surface, despite the absence of any secretory signal peptide; for example, annexin A1 translocates from the cytosol to the cell surface following exposure of cells to glucocorticoids [27], and annexin A2 is constitutively expressed at the surface of vascular endothelial cells where it functions in the regulation of blood clotting [28]. The expression level and tissue distribution of annexins span a broad range, from abundant and ubiquitous (annexins A1, A2, A4, A5, A6, A7, A11) to selective (such as annexin A3 in neutrophils and annexin A8 in the placenta and skin) or restrictive (such as annexin A9 in the tongue, annexin A10 in the stomach and annexin A13 in the small intestine).

The presence of multiple annexins in all higher eukaryotic cell types suggests fundamental roles in cell biology [5], even though prokaryotes and yeasts appear to tolerate their absence, but the apparent functional diversity within the family remains perplexing. The development of knockout mice has provided insight into the functions of annexins A1, A2, A5, A6 and A7. Loss of ANXA1 leads to changes in the inflammatory response and the effects of glucocorticoids [29], whereas the ANXA2 knockout mouse has defects in neovascularization and fibrin homeostasis [30]. The ANXA5 and ANXA6 knockout mice have subtler phenotypes and need further investigation [31, 32], and two independently derived ANXA7 null mutant mouse strains are either embryonic lethal [33] or show changes in calcium homeostasis [34]. The diversity of phenotype in the annexin knockout mice is consistent with these proteins having largely independent functions. Roles for annexins that have been established from studies using cultured cells are not always reflected in phenotypic abnormalities in the corresponding knockout mice, suggesting that functional redundancy may, in some instances, obscure the full range of functions of these multifunctional proteins. In mice that lack an overt phenotype, there is now the opportunity to test molecular theories of annexin function, such as the proposed calcium channel activity of annexin A5.


The definition of the biological processes in which annexins are involved has progressed through the use of gene knockouts and imaging. On the basis of studies using live cell imaging and targeted gene disruption, roles have now been unequivocally established for annexin A1 in inflammation, annexin A2 in vesicle traffic and annexin A7 in regulation of cell growth. The ubiquity and stability of annexins suggest some fundamental role of the unique core domain in cellular physiology, possibly involving adhesion mechanics, membrane traffic, signal transduction and/or developmental processes. To the extent that annexins may have adapted to the particular needs of their host species, molecular-evolution studies offer some insight into which structural changes may be responsible for their functional diversity, but biological data remain scant for nonvertebrate annexins. Transcript expression studies using microarrays and RNA interference offer new experimental approaches that could implicate annexins in some defined cellular process or pathway.

Long-standing problems also remain to be addressed. Do individual annexins have different functions in different cell types? How are annexins secreted? Can annexins be classified into groups with integrated functions, or are they functionally independent of each other? These and many other questions, and perhaps most importantly the need to understand mechanism, will occupy annexin biologists for years to come. The discovery of annexins with negligible calcium-binding capacity and growing evidence for interactions with other proteins may make the traditional definition of annexins as calcium-dependent phospholipid-binding proteins superfluous in the near future.


  1. Creutz CE, Pazoles CJ, Pollard HB: Identification and purification of an adrenal medullary protein (synexin) that causes calcium-dependent aggregation of isolated chromaffin granules.J Biol Chem 1978, 253:2858–2866. The first isolation of a protein of the annexin family (now called annexin A7) and demonstration of its role in vesicle fusion.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Huang KS, Wallner BP, Mattaliano RJ, Tizard R, Burne C, Frey A, Hession C, McGray P, Sinclair LK, Chow EP, et al.: Two human 35 kD inhibitors of phospholipase A2 are related to substrates of pp60v-src and of the epidermal growth factor receptor/kinase.Cell 1986, 46:191–199. Two proteins, now known as annexins A1 and A2, that were originally characterized as inhibitors of phospholipase A2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Saris CJ, Tack BF, Kristensen T, Glenney JR Jr, Hunter T: The cDNA sequence for the protein-tyrosine kinase substrate p36 (calpactin I heavy chain) reveals a multidomain protein with internal repeats.Cell 1986, 46:201–212. One of the first annexins to be cloned; it derived its name from its ability to bind calcium and bundle F-actin.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Human Gene Nomenclature Committee[]

  5. Gerke V, Moss SE: Annexins: from structure to function.Physiol Rev 2002, 82:331–371. A comprehensive review on annexins.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Giardia lambliagenome project[]

  7. Clark GB, Thompson G Jr, Roux SJ: Signal transduction mechanisms in plants: an overview.Curr Sci 2001, 80:170–177. A review of plant annexin functional genomics.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Iglesias JM, Morgan RO, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG, Gilbert DJ, Fernandez MP: Comparative genetics and evolution of annexin A13 as the founder gene of vertebrate annexins.Mol Biol Evol 2002, 19:608–618. Annexins A13, A7 and A11, the founder genes of vertebrate annexins, are the only ones likely to have either cognate orthologs or direct common ancestors in invertebrates.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Morgan RO, Bell DW, Testa JR, Fernandez MP: Genomic locations of ANX11 and ANX13 and the evolutionary genetics of human annexins.Genomics 1998, 48:100–110. Cladistic and computational analysis of nucleotide substitutions in coding regions yielded estimates for the order, molecular dating and functional constraints on annexin gene divergence.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fernandez MP, Morgan RO: Structure, function and evolution of the annexin gene superfamily.In The Annexins - Biological Importance and Annexin-related Pathologies(Edited by: Bandorowicz-Pikula J). Georgetown, TX: Landes Bioscience 2003, 21–37. A summary of annexin gene structures, chromosomal maps and protein evolution.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eddy SR: Profile hidden Markov models.Bioinformatics 1998, 14:755–763. This reference and the website in [12] pioneered the development and application of HMMs in sequence comparisons.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. HMMER: profile HMMs for protein sequence analysis[]

  13. Schuster-Böckler B, Schultz J, Rahmann S: HMM logos for visualization of protein families.BMC Bioinformatics 2004, 5:7. This reference and the website in [14] give a visual representation of multiple sequence alignments based on profile hidden Markov models.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Logos for Sequences, Profiles, and HMMs[]

  15. Ranz JM, Ponce AR, Hartl DL, Nurminsky D: Origin and evolution of a new gene expressed inDrosophilasperm axoneme.Genetica 2003, 118:233–244. Describes the creation of a unique gene fusion that transformed an annexin into the promoter of a dynein intermediate chain gene.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dehal P, Satou Y, Campbell RK, Chapman J, Degnan B, De Tomaso A, Davidson B, Di Gregorio A, Gelpke M, Goodstein DM, et al.: The draft genome ofCiona intestinalis: insights into chordate and vertebrate origins.Science 2002, 298:2157–2167. Genome assembly data identify five urochordate annexins, including one fused to an intermediate filament gene encoding a novel transcript.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ciona intestinalisv1.0 genome resources at the Joint Genome Institute[]

  18. Liemann S, Huber R: Three-dimensional structure of annexins.Cell Mol Life Sci 1997, 53:516–521. A review on the structural biology of annexins.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosengarth A, Luecke H: A calcium-driven conformational switch of the N-terminal and core domains of annexin A1.J Mol Biol 2003, 326:1317–1325. Calcium binding in the core tetrad was observed to release the amino-terminal domain enabling external binding interactions.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Annexin Structure and Function[]

  21. Gu X: Statistical methods for testing functional divergence after gene duplication.Mol Biol Evol 1999, 16:1664–1674. Site-specific changes in evolutionary rate during speciation offer one approach to localize functionally divergent domains within gene families, although the validity of this approach may depend on adequate representation by an extensive range of species groups.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Glaser F, Pupko T, Paz I, Bell RE, Bechor D, Martz E, Ben-Tal N: ConSurf: Identification of functional regions in proteins by surface-mapping of phylogenetic information.Bioinformatics 2003, 19:163–164. The web-server described here and found at [23] incorporates evolutionary information based on multiple alignments and phylogenetic trees into three-dimensional protein models.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. The ConSurf server[]

  24. RasTop[]

  25. Tomas A, Moss SE: Calcium- and cell cycle-dependent association of annexin 11 with the nuclear envelope.J Biol Chem 2003, 278:20210–20216. A demonstration using live cell imaging that annexin A11 associates in a reversible calcium-dependent manner with the nuclear envelope.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Eberhard DA, Karns LR, VandenBerg SR, Creutz CE: Control of the nuclear-cytoplasmic partitioning of annexin II by a nuclear export signal and by p11 binding.J Cell Sci 2001, 114:3155–3166. This paper provides evidence that nuclear translocation of annexin A2 is regulated in part by sequestration in the cytosol by the S100A10 calcium-binding protein, also called p11.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Solito E, Nuti S, Parente L: Dexamethasone-induced translocation of lipocortin (annexin) 1 to the cell membrane of U-937 cells.Br J Pharmacol 1994, 112:347–348. Demonstration that a glucocorticoid analog stimulates the translocation of annexin A1 to the cell surface, providing an important advance in understanding the anti-inflammatory function of annexin A1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Brownstein C, Falcone DJ, Jacovina A, Hajjar KA: A mediator of cell surface-specific plasmin generation.Ann NY Acad Sci 2001, 947:143–155. A review that discusses the cell-surface expression of annexin A2 and its role in the regulation of plasmin generation.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hannon R, Croxtall JD, Getting SJ, Roviezzo F, Yona S, Paul-Clark MJ, Gavins FN, Perretti M, Morris JF, Buckingham JC, Flower RJ: Aberrant inflammation and resistance to glucocorticoids in annexin 1-/- mouse.FASEB J 2003, 17:253–255. The first report of a phenotype for the annexin A1 knockout mouse.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ling Q, Jacovina AT, Deora A, Febbraio M, Simantov R, Silverstein RL, Hempstead B, Mark WH, Hajjar KA: Annexin II regulates fibrin homeostasis and neoangiogenesisin vivo.J Clin Invest 2004, 113:38–48. Although the annexin A2 null mutant mouse develops a normal vasculature, it has a severely reduced capacity to create new blood vessels.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Brachvogel B, Dikschas J, Moch H, Welzel H, von der Mark K, Hofmann C, Poschl E: Annexin A5 is not essential for skeletal development.Mol Cell Biol 2003, 23:2907–2913. The annexin A5 knockout mouse lacks any clear phenotype, confounding theories about annexin A5 function in anticoagulation, collagen binding and bone formation.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hawkins TE, Roes J, Rees D, Monkhouse J, Moss SE: Immunological development and cardiovascular function are normal in annexin VI null mutant mice.Mol Cell Biol 1999, 19:8028–8032. The annexin A6 knockout mouse is essentially normal; initial characterization revealed little in the way of functional insights.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Srivastava M, Atwater I, Glasman M, Leighton X, Goping G, Caohuy H, Miller G, Pichel J, Westphal H, Mears D, et al.: Defects in inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor expression, Ca(2+) signaling, and insulin secretion in the anx7(+/-) knockout mouse.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999, 96:13783–13788. The first annexin A7 knockout mouse is embryonic lethal, with a severe phenotype even in the heterozygotes.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Herr C, Smyth N, Ullrich S, Yun F, Sasse P, Hescheler J, Fleischmann B, Lasek K, Brixius K, Schwinger RH, et al.: Loss of annexin A7 leads to alterations in frequency-induced shortening of isolated murine cardiomyocytes.Mol Cell Biol 2001, 21:4119–4128. The second annexin A7 knockout mouse is essentially normal, with a modest cardiomyocyte phenotype.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by grant number BMC2002-00827 from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Spain, and by the Wellcome Trust, UK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen E Moss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moss, S.E., Morgan, R.O. The annexins. Genome Biol 5, 219 (2004).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: