- Open Access
Endogenous retroviruses in the human genome sequence
© BioMed Central Ltd 2001
- Published: 5 June 2001
The human genome contains many endogenous retroviral sequences, and these have been suggested to play important roles in a number of physiological and pathological processes. Can the draft human genome sequences help us to define the role of these elements more closely?
- Murine Leukemia Virus
- Human Genome Sequence
- Promyelocytic Leukemia Zinc Finger
- Draft Human Genome
- Draft Human Genome Sequence
HERVs have been grouped into three broad classes - I, II and III - on the basis of sequence similarity to different genera of infectious retroviruses. Each class has a number of subgroups, many of which are named according to an older system of HERV nomenclature based on the specificity of the tRNA primer-binding site (Figure 1). Class I HERVs are related to gammaretroviruses such as murine leukemia virus (MLV); class I includes HERV-W and HERV-H, among many other subgroups. Class II HERVs are related to betaretroviruses such as mouse mammary tumor virus and include several types of HERV-K element. Class III HERVs are distantly related to spumaretroviruses and include HERV-L and HERV-S.
Like other transposable elements, HERVs are thought to have played an important role in the evolution of mammalian genomes, and the human genome sequence has already been of use in phylogenetic studies of HERVs. By analyzing HERV integration sites, the evolution of these elements has been tracked through the primate lineage. Measurement of the divergence of LTR sequences has also been used as a 'molecular clock' to estimate the age of HERVs (given that the LTRs are identical at the time of integration) . Class I and class III HERVs are the oldest groups and are present throughout the primate lineage, while class II includes HERVs that have been active most recently. Many class II loci are restricted to chimpanzees and humans and a few proviruses of the HERV-K(HLM-2) subgroup are human-specific , indicating that these viruses have been active within the last 5 million years.
Although HERVs have retained some similarity to their exogenous counterparts, they have acquired many mutations over the course of evolutionary time so that, with a few exceptions, they are now defective and incapable of producing protein (Figure 1b). Analysis of the draft human genome has so far found only three HERV proviruses with complete open reading frames for gag, pol and env (the three essential viral genes) , and at least one of these HERVs is mutated at a critical residue in the reverse transcriptase domain of pol . This is in contrast to the situation in some other species, such as pigs and mice, in which a few endogenous retroviruses have retained the capacity for infectious transmission . Because of the activity of endogenous viruses in animals, there remains a great deal of interest in identifying biologically functional HERVs, and specific candidates may be detected by further analysis of the human genome sequence.
The best example of a HERV with a known function is HERV-W. The envelope proteins of this HERV are thought to mediate fusion of trophoblasts, an essential step during formation of the placenta . A role in membrane fusion is not surprising since this is the role of the viral Env protein during retroviral infection following binding to a cell surface receptor. Interestingly, trophoblast fusion by HERV-W Env appears to be independent of a specific receptor molecule. A different HERV (ERV-3) had previously been suggested to provide the trophoblast fusion function but was later ruled out by the discovery of individuals who are homozygous for an inactivating mutation . Sequence comparisons in different individuals may yet reveal such polymorphisms for HERV-W.
Another function proposed for HERVs is in determining resistance to viral infection. In mice, resistance to infection by MLV is controlled by a Gag-like protein encoded by Fv1, an otherwise defective endogenous retrovirus related to human HERV-L . The molecular basis of this restriction is not yet known, but it has been suggested that the Fv1 protein interacts with the incoming core of the MLV viral particle in a dominant-negative manner, thereby inhibiting infection. Cell lines from other species, including humans, also have an intracellular restriction to MLV infection , but the mouse and human restrictions occur at different stages of viral entry. Although the inhibitory factor in humans has yet to be cloned, it is possible that endogenous retroviral Gag proteins may provide a general mechanism for controlling retroviral infection in mammals.
HERVs have frequently been proposed as etiological cofactors in chronic diseases such as cancer, autoimmunity and neurological disease . Unfortunately, despite intense effort from many groups, there remains little direct evidence to support these claims, and moreover some studies have served only to muddy the waters for others. One particular difficulty has been picking out the coding-competent subset of HERVs from the large background 'noise' of defective elements. The clinical heterogeneity of many of the associated diseases, such as lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis, has also been a problem, since HERVs may be involved in specific subtypes of a particular disease and such subtypes may not be recognized by current diagnostic criteria. The availability of the human genome sequence will facilitate the identification of those HERV loci most likely to be involved in disease. In addition, a deeper understanding of the genetic basis of these diseases should lead to a more precise definition of disease subtypes. In turn, this may clarify the part played by HERVs.
Much of the evidence that links HERVs to disease comes from the detection of expressed retroviral sequences in patient tissue by degenerately primed PCR. For example, HERV-W was first identified in a search for retroviruses in people with multiple sclerosis , and the same HERV was recently detected in both cerebrospinal fluid and brain tissue from patients with schizophrenia . The significance of HERV RNA expression in studies such as these remains unclear, because disease causation cannot be proved simply by the detection of virus expression, particularly for a ubiquitous sequence such as a HERV. In addition, although HERV RNA expression is known to be increased in several autoimmune diseases and cancers, there is usually activation of a range of class I and class II HERVs rather than expression of a single provirus. In general, further validation of disease association for HERVs has not been described. An exception is the HERV-K(HML-2) subgroup, which has been implicated in germ-cell tumors. As noted above, this subgroup includes the youngest and most active HERVs, and specific attention has focused on the ability of these elements to form virus-like particles in teratocarcinoma-derived cell lines . Some of these particles are able to bud from the cell surface, although it is doubtful whether they are infectious. In addition, patients with germ-cell tumors frequently have antibodies to HERV-K Gag and Env proteins . Recent work has shown that a regulatory protein produced by HERV-K(HML-2) can bind the transcription factor PLZF (promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger protein), which is required for spermatogenesis . Impairment of spermatogenesis is associated with increased frequency of germ-cell tumors, and thus perturbation of PLZF function could provide a mechanism for the involvement of HERV-K in tumorigenesis.
Clearly, many questions remain. Are HERV-K particles produced from a single intact provirus or does trans-complementation of proteins from several loci lead to the production of composite particles? Are any of these particles infectious and do they contribute to tumor formation? The human genome sequence may be able to help to address these issues by identifying those copies of HERV-K(HML-2) that are most likely to contribute to particle production. Comparison of these loci between patients with germ-cell tumors and controls may then reveal differences which could be the focus of further research.
The activity of HERV LTRs may be modulated by several factors (Figure 2c). Differential methylation of LTR promoters has recently been proposed as a mechanism for mediating phenotypic variation . LTR polymorphisms could also explain some of the differences in HERV expression between individuals, since small changes in LTR sequence can have large effects on promoter function . Furthermore, factors that affect the general level of cell activation will also influence LTR activity. Whether HERV-driven modulation of gene expression is involved in disease etiology remains to be determined, but the increased detection of HERV transcripts in diseases such as cancer and autoimmunity confirms that LTR activity is altered in these conditions. A search of the genome for HERVs and other transposon promoters close to candidate disease genes may produce useful information. Analysis of the selected HERV LTRs for polymorphisms might then reveal important differences between people with and without particular diseases.
The human genome sequence has already provided a great deal of useful information for studies on the evolution of HERVs and their role in shaping the genome. The issue of a biological function for HERVs is more difficult to address, but the genome sequence can be exploited to identify those HERV loci most likely to be capable of producing proteins or viral particles. Use of additional types of information, including information about consensus sequences of repetitive families, which is regularly updated at Repbase  and about gene expression, from EST databases such as dbEST , will also be necessary, together with a comparison of HERVs from a number of individuals with different diseases and in different populations. This analysis may well require the development of more sensitive search algorithms for detecting HERVs in sequence data. The challenge will then be to use this information to design incisive experiments to determine the pathological or physiological roles of HERVs.
- Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, Nusbaum C, Zody MC, Baldwin J, Devon K, Dewar K, Doyle M, FitzHugh W, et al: Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 2001, 409: 860-921. 10.1086/172716.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW, Li PW, Mural RJ, Sutton GG, Smith HO, Yandell M, Evans CA, Holt RA, et al: The sequence of the human genome. Science. 2001, 291: 1304-1351. 10.1126/science.1058040.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li WH, Gu Z, Wang H, Nekrutenko A: Evolutionary analyses of the human genome. Nature. 2001, 409: 847-849. 10.1038/35057039.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boeke JD, Stoye JP: Retrotransposons, endogenous retroviruses, and the evolution of retroelements. In Retroviruses. Edited by Coffin JM, Hughes SH and Varmus HE. Cold Spring Harbor; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press:. 1997, 343-435.Google Scholar
- Tristem M: Identification and characterization of novel human endogenous retrovirus families by phylogenetic screening of the human genome mapping project database. J Virol. 2000, 74: 3715-3730. 10.1128/JVI.74.8.3715-3730.2000.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Medstrand P, Mager DL: Human-specific integrations of the HERV-K endogenous retrovirus family. J Virol. 1998, 72: 9782-9787.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mayer J, Sauter M, Racz A, Scherer D, Mueller-Lantzsch N, Meese E: An almost-intact human endogenous retrovirus K on human chromosome 7. Nat Genet. 1999, 21: 257-258. 10.1038/6766.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Patience C, Takeuchi Y, Weiss RA: Infection of human cells by an endogenous retrovirus of pigs. Nat Med. 1997, 3: 282-286.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mi S, Lee X, Li X, Veldman GM, Finnerty H, Racie L, LaVallie E, Tang XY, Edouard P, Howes S, et al: Syncytin is a captive retroviral envelope protein involved in human placental morphogenesis. Nature. 2000, 403: 785-789. 10.1038/35001608.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Parseval N, Heidmann T: Physiological knockout of the envelope gene of the single-copy ERV-3 human endogenous retrovirus in a fraction of the Caucasian population. J Virol. 1998, 72: 3442-3445.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Best S, Tissier P, Towers G, Stoye JP: Positional cloning of the mouse retrovirus restriction gene Fv1. Nature. 1996, 382: 826-829. 10.1038/382826a0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Towers G, Bock M, Martin S, Takeuchi Y, Stoye JP, Danos O: A conserved mechanism of retrovirus restriction in mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 12295-12299. 10.1073/pnas.200286297.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lower R: The pathogenic potential of endogenous retroviruses: facts and fantasies. Trends Microbiol. 1999, 7: 350-356. 10.1016/S0966-842X(99)01565-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Perron H, Garson JA, Bedin F, Beseme F, Paranhos-Baccala G, Komurian-Pradel F, Mallet F, Tuke PW, Voisset C, Blond JL, et al: Molecular identification of a novel retrovirus repeatedly isolated from patients with multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94: 7583-7588. 10.1073/pnas.94.14.7583.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Karlsson H, Bachmann S, Schroder J, McArthur J, Torrey EF, Yolken RH: Retroviral RNA identified in the cerebrospinal fluids and brains of individuals with schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 4634-4639. 10.1073/pnas.061021998.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bieda K, Hoffmann A, Boller K: Phenotypic heterogeneity of human endogenous retrovirus particles produced by teratocarcinoma cell lines. J Gen Virol. 2001, 82: 591-596.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boller K, Janssen O, Schuldes H, Tonjes RR, Kurth R: Characterization of the antibody response specific for the human endogenous retrovirus HTDV/HERV-K. J Virol. 1997, 71: 4581-4588.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Boese A, Sauter M, Galli U, Best B, Herbst H, Mayer J, Kremmer E, Roemer K, Mueller-Lantzsch N: Human endogenous retrovirus protein cORF supports cell transformation and associates with the promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger protein. Oncogene. 2000, 19: 4328-4336. 10.1038/sj/onc/1203794.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schulte AM, Lai S, Kurtz A, Czubayko F, Riegel AT, Wellstein A: Human trophoblast and choriocarcinoma expression of the growth factor pleiotrophin attributable to germ-line insertion of an endogenous retrovirus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996, 93: 14759-14764. 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14759.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ting CN, Rosenberg MP, Snow CM, Samuelson LC, Meisler MH: Endogenous retroviral sequences are required for tissue-specific expression of a human salivary amylase gene. Genes Dev. 1992, 6: 1457-1465.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kowalski PE, Freeman JD, Mager DL: Intergenic splicing between a HERV-H endogenous retrovirus and two adjacent human genes. Genomics. 1999, 57: 371-379. 10.1006/geno.1999.5787.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Whitelaw E, Martin DI: Retrotransposons as epigenetic mediators of phenotypic variation in mammals. Nat Genet. 2001, 27: 361-365. 10.1038/86850.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schon U, Seifarth W, Baust C, Hohenadl C, Erfle V, Leib-Mosch C: Cell type-specific expression and promoter activity of human endogenous retroviral long terminal repeats. Virology. 2001, 279: 280-291. 10.1006/viro.2000.0712.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Repbase Update. [http://www.girinst.org/Repbase_Update.html]
- Expressed Sequence Tags Database. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/dbEST/index.html]