Skip to main content
Fig. 4 | Genome Biology

Fig. 4

From: Utilizing AAV-mediated LEAPER 2.0 for programmable RNA editing in non-human primates and nonsense mutation correction in humanized Hurler syndrome mice

Fig. 4

Optimization of the circ-arRNA for human IDUAW402X mutation transcripts in cultured cells. A Diagram illustrating the human Hurler syndrome mouse model and corresponding reporter system. B–D The percentage of eGFP+ cells indicating the editing rate of various circ-arRNA designs targeting the reporter transcripts in HEK293T cells; n = 3, mean ± SD. E The percentage of eGFP+ cells and mean fluorescence intensity showing the editing rate of the reporter transcripts in HEK293T cells for 20 different versions of circ-arRNA; n = 3, mean ± SD. F NGS results showing the bystander editing for versions 5, 6, 7, 9, and 14 of circ-arRNA85+C+15_AC303’; asterisks represent synonymous mutation; n = 3, mean ± SD. G Editing rate of IDUAW402X transcripts in GM06214 cells 2 weeks post-AAV-PHP.eB infection; n = 2, mean ± SD. H Measurement of IDUA protein catalytic activity using a 4-methylumbelliferyl IDUA substrate in GM06214 cells 2 weeks post-AAV-PHP.eB infection; n = 2, mean ± SD. I NGS results showing the bystander editing of IDUA transcripts; asterisks represent synonymous mutations; n = 2, mean ± SD. Student’s T-test was used for all statistical comparisons between the different groups

Back to article page