Table 1 Performance comparison of the binners on the simulated datasets evaluated by AMBER

From: MetaBinner: a high-performance and stand-alone ensemble binning method to recover individual genomes from complex microbial communities

Dataset	Methods	Metrics
		#bins (>50% comp <10% cont)	#bins (>70% comp <10% cont)	#bins (>90% comp <10% cont)	#bins (>50% comp <5% cont)	#bins (>70% comp <5% cont)	#bins (>90% comp <5% cont)
CAMI Airways	CONCOCT	42	38	32	42	38	32
	MaxBin	88	82	64	67	62	51
	MetaBAT	92	80	56	84	74	51
	VAMB	90	75	47	86	72	46
	BMC3C	18	8	6	13	6	4
	DAS Tool	106	101	80	94	91	71
	MetaWRAP	136	119	83	131	118	82
	MetaBinner	215	191	144	186	169	129
CAMI	CONCOCT	66	64	61	62	60	57
Gastrointestinal	MaxBin	114	110	101	106	103	97
tract	MetaBAT	97	93	83	93	89	80
	VAMB	57	55	42	56	55	42
	BMC3C	12	9	7	7	4	3
	DAS Tool	130	125	116	124	120	111
	MetaWRAP	134	126	114	131	123	112
	MetaBinner	183	173	152	176	166	147
CAMI mouse gut	CONCOCT	102	102	88	92	92	79
	MaxBin	449	435	351	423	409	332
	MetaBAT	375	350	286	361	338	277
	VAMB	382	370	293	372	363	288
	BMC3C	315	306	262	297	290	253
	DAS Tool	469	461	377	441	435	357
	MetaWRAP	506	487	377	500	482	375
	MetaBinner	575	532	421	535	503	409

The best results among all the methods are in bold, while the best results among the individual binners are italicized. The input binning results of MetaWRAP and DAS Tool are generated by CONCOCT, MaxBin, and MetaBAT. “#bins (>50% comp <10% cont)” denotes the number of recovered bins that have >50% completeness and <10% contamination

Back to article page

ISSN: 1474-760X

Contact us

Submission enquiries: editorial@genomebiology.com
General enquiries: info@biomedcentral.com