Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of the binnig performance of MetaBAT2, bin3C, and HiCBin using half of the contigs that were labeled by TAXAassign in terms of F-score, ARI, and NMI on the human gut sample

From: HiCBin: binning metagenomic contigs and recovering metagenome-assembled genomes using Hi-C contact maps

 

F-score

ARI

NMI

MetaBAT2

0.748 (0.010)

0.724 (0.011)

0.779 (0.003)

bin3C

0.721 (0.014)

0.705 (0.014)

0.775 (0.004)

HiCBin

0.816 (0.013)

0.800 (0.015)

0.825 (0.005)

  1. Note: The optimal values of the results are in bold. Values in the parentheses represent the standard deviations of ten times validation experiments