Skip to main content

Table 1 Mean population introgression proportions based on empirical inference and simulated datasets (using SPLATCHE2)

From: The genomic impact of historical hybridization with massive mitochondrial DNA introgression

Parameters Introgression proportions (%) Max.a Sign.b
Set KG KT G M A Mean ALT SEV PAN CBR CRE VLP MAD VAL SOR NAV   
Empirical
 ELAI 2.0 1.3 1.6 1.5 1.9 1.9 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.4
Simulated
 par1 1000 500 0.5 0.2 0.005 3.9 4.0 4.0 3.9 3.9 3.9 4.0 4.0 3.9 4.0 3.9 70 35
 par2 1000 500 0.5 0.02 0.005 8.5 7.0 6.7 7.6 8.6 7.6 10.3 8.8 8.2 9.8 10.1 80 45
 par3 1000 500 0.5 0.2 0.03 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 95 70
 par4 1000 500 0.5 0.02 0.03 34.9 28.9 28.1 31.1 34.9 31.7 40.9 36.2 34.5 40.7 42.4 95 85
 par5 10,000 5000 0.5 0.2 0.005 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 50 30
 par6 10,000 5000 0.5 0.02 0.005 11.3 9.5 9.0 10.2 11.5 10.2 13.5 11.7 10.8 12.9 13.2 65 40
 par7 10,000 5000 0.5 0.2 0.03 25.2 25.3 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.3 25.2 25.2 80 60
 par8 10,000 5000 0.5 0.02 0.03 37.4 31.2 30.5 33.4 37.3 34.1 43.2 38.7 37.1 43.2 45.0 95 75
  1. KG L. granatensis deme carrying capacity, KT L. timidus deme carrying capacity, G intrinsic growth rate (same for L. timidus and L. granatensis), M migration rates between adjacent demes (same for L. timidus and L. granatensis), A bidirectional admixture. Population names are as in Fig. 1a and Additional file 1: Table S1. aMaximum introgression frequency (across the 10 individuals) in percentage. bIntrogression frequency (in percentage) above which empirical introgression frequencies are significantly higher than expected according to simulations