Skip to main content

Table 1 Datasets in this study

From: Comparison of Hi-C results using in-solution versus in-nucleus ligation

Dataset name Total di-tags Mapped di-tags Percentre-ligation Unique di-tags Percent cis Percent trans Percent hybrid
Mouse-1 ISL 255,402,369 173,621,670 2.17 123,691,456 34.7 65.3 0.02
Mouse-2 ISL 131,079,448 83,009,025 3.85 32,939,021 72.1 27.9 0.05
Human-1 ISL 31,550,241 19,444,276 5.61 11,128,672 41.3 58.7 0.08
Human-2 ISL 27,518,246 17,060,401 7.79 6,994,931 74.5 25.5 0.03
Mouse-human-1 ISL 40,398,555 22,667,233 3.16 17,137,291 38.2 61.8 11.9
Mouse-human-2 ISL 2,928,112 1,405,001 3.84 488,340 72.9 27.1 2.9
Mouse-1 INL 242,699,915 167,175,980 3.49 108,733,338 85.6 14.4 0.16
Mouse-2 INL 134,813,901 85,804,344 6.80 37,259,526 88.0 12.0 0.02
Human-1 INL 34,860,295 22,113,388 10.40 11,457,531 85.8 14.2 0.07
Human-2 INL 33,500,802 20,280,022 14.03 7,777,001 90.0 10.0 0.03
Mouse-human-1 INL 33,762,441 19,318,810 4.16 11,533,994 85.6 14.4 0.06
Mouse-human-2 INL 2,920,332 1,423,890 7.53 573,366 88.5 11.5 0.07
Mouse RL 36,268,145 25,581,886 9.25 4,920,447 7.1 92.9 -
  1. INL in-nucleus ligation, ISL in-solution ligation, RL random ligation