Skip to main content

Table 1 Datasets in this study

From: Comparison of Hi-C results using in-solution versus in-nucleus ligation

Dataset name

Total di-tags

Mapped di-tags

Percentre-ligation

Unique di-tags

Percent cis

Percent trans

Percent hybrid

Mouse-1 ISL

255,402,369

173,621,670

2.17

123,691,456

34.7

65.3

0.02

Mouse-2 ISL

131,079,448

83,009,025

3.85

32,939,021

72.1

27.9

0.05

Human-1 ISL

31,550,241

19,444,276

5.61

11,128,672

41.3

58.7

0.08

Human-2 ISL

27,518,246

17,060,401

7.79

6,994,931

74.5

25.5

0.03

Mouse-human-1 ISL

40,398,555

22,667,233

3.16

17,137,291

38.2

61.8

11.9

Mouse-human-2 ISL

2,928,112

1,405,001

3.84

488,340

72.9

27.1

2.9

Mouse-1 INL

242,699,915

167,175,980

3.49

108,733,338

85.6

14.4

0.16

Mouse-2 INL

134,813,901

85,804,344

6.80

37,259,526

88.0

12.0

0.02

Human-1 INL

34,860,295

22,113,388

10.40

11,457,531

85.8

14.2

0.07

Human-2 INL

33,500,802

20,280,022

14.03

7,777,001

90.0

10.0

0.03

Mouse-human-1 INL

33,762,441

19,318,810

4.16

11,533,994

85.6

14.4

0.06

Mouse-human-2 INL

2,920,332

1,423,890

7.53

573,366

88.5

11.5

0.07

Mouse RL

36,268,145

25,581,886

9.25

4,920,447

7.1

92.9

-

  1. INL in-nucleus ligation, ISL in-solution ligation, RL random ligation