Skip to main content

Table 1 Significant changes between control and ED-treated samples after disturbing G1 germ line imprint erasure - RNA

From: Deleterious effects of endocrine disruptors are corrected in the mammalian germline by epigenome reprogramming

     

% MAT allele Avg. (n = 3)

Transcript

Cell type

ED

Difference (%)

SD (%)

Student’s t -test P value

Imprinted base line (cutoff 80%)

Oil

Treatment

Nesp

MGC

VZ

-9.1

3.440

0.004

NO (erased)

39

30

Nesp

FGC

BPA

-8.2

4.356

0.042

NO (erased)

38

30

Nesp

MGC

BPA

-7.9

0.956

0.001

NO (erased)

39

31

Asb4

MGC

DEHP

8.7

3.769

0.049

NO (erased)

54

63

Zim1

FGC

DEHP

9.0

5.406

0.030

NO (erased)

52

61

H19

FGC

DEHP

10.6

7.507

0.024

NO (erased)

65

75

Meg3

FGC

BPA

13.7

4.713

0.016

NO (erased)

65

79

Meg3

MGC

VZ

16.8

4.438

0.002

NO (erased)

73

90

  1. Allele-specific transcription was compared between ED- and vehicle-treated samples for each transcript in 13.5 dpc FGC and MGC using SNuPE assays. Changes in the average (n = 3) allele-specific transcription that were greater than 5% and were statistically significant (P <0.05) were tabulated and ordered according to the difference in maternal allele-specific expression. Baseline allele specificity of transcription in the maternal (MAT) or paternal (PAT) allele was not observed (NO) in the vehicle-treated sample (cutoff 80%), indicating erased imprinting in PGCs. Of those with baseline erasure, the expression or DNA methylation became more biased toward one parental allele in a few instances, indicating a lack of proper erasure of imprinted expression (see the last column).