Skip to main content

Table 1 Significant correlations between Subject A’s metadata and microbiota

From: Host lifestyle affects human microbiota on daily timescales

Body site

Lag (days)

Host factor

Representative OTUs (n)

ρ

Pvalue

Abun. (%)

Cluster ID

Total OTUs

Subject A Gut

0

Stool: Hardness

Eggerthella/Clostridium (11)

-0.30

1.0E-06

0.2144

10

23

0

Stool: Time Of Day

Eggerthella/Clostridium (11)

0.27

7.4E-06

0.2144

10

23

1

Nutrition: Fiber

Clostridium (6)

-0.38

7.4E-06

0.0442

6

9

1

Nutrition: Fiber

Ruminococcaceae/F. prausnitzii (4)

-0.44

1.1E-07

0.3745

8

8

1

Nutrition: Fiber

Eggerthella/Clostridium (11)

-0.39

3.3E-06

0.2144

10

23

1

Nutrition: Fiber

Ruminococcus/R. gnavus/Clostridium (4)

-0.51

2.9E-10

0.5479

51

12

1

Nutrition: Fiber

Ruminococcus/R. gnavus/Clostridium (5)

-0.51

3.8E-10

0.3495

52

7

1

Nutrition: Fiber

Blautia (3)

-0.38

7.6E-06

0.0346

53

3

1

Nutrition: Fiber

Bifidobacteriales (13)

0.36

1.6E-05

6.0786

86

13

1

Nutrition: Fiber

Coprococcus (8)

0.44

7.2E-08

4.2192

89

12

1

Nutrition: Fiber

Clostridium (1)

-0.42

4.6E-07

0.0716

111

1

1

Nutrition: Fiber

Ruminococcus/R. gnavus/Clostridium (6)

-0.44

1.2E-07

2.0690

118

14

1

Nutrition: Fiber

Roseburia/E. rectale (30)

0.37

8.4E-06

5.0446

127

40

1

Food: OrangeJuice

Clostridium (1)

0.28

4.7E-06

0.0457

106

2

1

Food: BreakfastBar

Ruminococcus/R. gnavus/Clostridium (4)

-0.27

6.6E-06

0.5479

51

12

1

Food: BreakfastBar

Ruminococcus/R. gnavus/Clostridium (5)

-0.40

2.9E-11

0.3495

52

7

1

Food: BreakfastBar

Bifidobacteriales (13)

0.27

9.5E-06

6.0786

86

13

1

Food: BreakfastBar

Clostridium (1)

-0.43

5.3E-13

0.0716

111

1

1

Food: Yogurt

Bifidobacteriales (2)

0.45

2.7E-14

0.0069

85

2

1

Food: Fruits: Fresh

Clostridiales (4)

-0.27

1.1E-05

0.1866

120

9

1

Food: Fruits: Citrus

Ruminococcaceae/F. prausnitzii (4)

0.36

1.7E-09

1.7152

107

4

1

Food: Soup

Clostridiales (1)

-0.25

3.3E-05

0.0014

62

2

1

Food: Soup

Blautia (21)

-0.26

2.4E-05

3.8126

68

31

1

Food: Soup: Other

Clostridiales (1)

-0.27

1.3E-05

0.0014

62

2

1

Food: Soup: Other

Blautia (21)

-0.28

4.2E-06

3.8126

68

31

Subject A Saliva

-7

Exercise: TookPlace

S. mutans/S. sanguinis (2)

-0.28

1.6E-05

0.0142

21

2

1

OralCare: Flossing

S. mutans/S. sanguinis (2)

-0.30

2.5E-06

0.0142

21

2

 

1

Fitness: BodyFat

Prevotella (4)

-0.36

1.4E-06

1.5761

35

14

  1. Non-parametric statistics were used to identify metadata variables significantly correlated with clustered OTUs lagged forward or backwards in time (q <0.05, Spearman correlation). Representative taxonomic names from each cluster are shown along with the percentage of overall reads accounted for by each OTU cluster (‘Abundance’). Redundant correlations (for example, yogurt subtypes associated with the same OTU cluster) are shown in Additional file 9, and a full list of taxa associated with each cluster can be found in Additional files 10 and 11. We excluded Subject A’s travel period and Subject B’s post-infection period from metadata correlation analysis. No significant correlations were found among Subject B’s microbiota and metadata.
Back to article page

Genome Biology

ISSN: 1474-760X

Contact us