Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of interactions confirmed in RegulonDB and identified by ChIP-chip experiments, CLR, SEREND and DISTILLER for five global regulators

From: DISTILLER: a data integration framework to reveal condition dependency of complex regulons in Escherichia coli

 

Confirmed RegulonDB

 

Not ChIP-chip

ChIP-chip

Total

Recall

Precision

FNR

     

ChIP-chip

-

21

21

  

CLR

0

0

0

0

0

SEREND

-

-

-

-

-

DISTILLER

29

19

48

0.90

0.40

CRP

     

ChIP-chip

-

31

31

  

CLR

3

0

3

0

0

SEREND

-

-

-

-

-

DISTILLER

90

21

111

0.68

0.19

Fis

     

ChIP-chip

-

5

5

  

CLR

1

0

1

0

0

SEREND

-

-

-

-

-

DISTILLER

18

3

21

0.60

0.14

H-NS

     

ChIP-chip

-

0

0

  

CLR

0

0

0

0

0

SEREND

-

-

-

-

-

DISTILLER

0

0

0

0

0

IHF

     

ChIP-chip

-

8

8

  

CLR

4

0

4

0

0

SEREND

-

-

-

-

-

DISTILLER

32

7

39

0.88

0.18

  1. For each method, the identified interactions that were known as compared to RegulonDB were selected. For all known interactions, we indicate whether (ChIP-chip) or not (Not ChIP-chip) the interactions were found in a corresponding ChIP-chip experiment. The recall (TP/TP + FN) and precision (TP/TP + FP) were calculated using the ChIP-chip data as a gold standard. Interactions identified by either CLR, SEREND or DISTILLER and confirmed by a ChIP-chip experiment were considered to be true positives (TP); interactions confirmed by a ChIP-chip experiment but not identified by either CLR, SEREND or DISTILLER were considered false negatives (FN); interactions identified by either CLR, SEREND or DISTILLER but not confirmed in a ChIP-chip experiment were considered false positives (FP). Note that since all interactions of RegulonDB are recovered by SEREND by definition (algorithmic consequence of using RegulonDB as a training set), a comparison with SEREND was not possible here.