Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison with previous approaches based on gene expression response to TF deletion

From: Clustering of genes into regulons using integrated modeling-COGRIM

Method

YAP1

SWI5

SWI4

GCN4

COGRIM (B+/C+)

7.24 × e-03

3.71 × e-04

1.23 × e-07

2.57 × e-11

COGRIM (B-/C+)

6.31 × e-03

1.01 × e-03

3.29 × e-03

4.40 × e-03

Model I (B+/C+)

0.018

4.00 × e-04

7.31 × e-04

4.80 × e-09

Model I (B-/C+)

0.012

8.14 × e-03

1.07 × e-03

7.95 × e-03

MA-Networker

0.021

1.81 × e-04

2.34 × e-06

2.17 × e-10

GRAM

0.259

0.281

1.14 × e-05

1.54 × e-04

ReMoDiscovery

0.102

7.73 × e-03

0.364

3.23 × e-10

ChIP binding data alone (B+)

0.194

0.036

9.80 × e-04

1.96 × e-04

  1. Standard t-tests were conducted to indicate the significance of the change in expression between knockout and wild-type. Model I, COGRIM without interaction terms; TF, transcription factor.