- Paper report
- Open Access
Levels of synteny between rice and maize
- Todd Richmond
© BioMed Central Ltd 2000
Received: 30 April 2000
Published: 20 June 2000
A portion of the rice genome has been examined in order to evaluate the feasibility of using rice as a surrogate genome for map-based cloning of maize genes.
Significance and context
A number of studies over the past few years have examined the similarities between the various plant genomes. As the rice genome sequence is nearing completion, researchers are anxious to know if sequence information from rice can be used to facilitate map-based cloning in other closely related grass species, such as maize and sorghum. Tarchini et al. have discovered that the presence of rapidly evolving gene families and microtranslocations in the rice genome may hamper its use as a model system for cloning genes in other organisms.
Tarchini et al. completely sequenced a 340 kb region surrounding the rice Adh1 and Adh2 loci as the starting point for their analysis of colinearity between rice and maize. The Adh1 region is a logical starting point because it has been the subject of detailed analysis in other crop species. The authors discovered 33 putative genes in the region, including Adh1 and Adh2. Twelve of the genes show similarity to genes of known function, most related to disease resistance. Frequent gene duplications were seen, closely spaced and mostly in the same orientation. Similar duplications have been found in Arabidopsis and suggest that gene duplication events are a common occurrence in plant genome evolution. Almost 30% of the region comprises repetitive elements, including retrotransposons, transposons, miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements, and simple-sequence repeats. Thirteen of the loci in the region were tested for their ability to cross-hybridize with maize genomic DNA. Only five genes hybridized well, and only three of those showed useful polymorphisms in the maize mapping populations tested. The authors' results indicate microcolinearity between the Adh1-Adh2 region on rice chromosome 11 and the Adh2 region on maize chromosome 4. Data from other labs have shown that the maize Adh1 gene is on maize chromosome 1, indicating that at some point after the duplication event that created Adh1 and Adh2, a translocation occurred in maize (and sorghum), placing the two Adh genes in these species on different chromosomes. The limited success of Tarchini et al. with cross-hybridization of rice genes with maize genomic DNA, as well as gene duplications, divergent selection and micro- and macro-translocation events in the grasses generally, suggest that there will be complications in using rice to facilitate map-based cloning in maize. There appear to be blocks of microcolinearity, interspersed with unrelated genes and repetitive elements. These results agree with those of others, and suggest that this approach will have to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
Tarchini et al. make no comparison between their sequence and the published sequence for the Adh1 regions from maize (225 kb) and sorghum (75 kb). This may be because most of the relevant sequence does not overlap, as a result of the translocation that separated Adh1 and Adh2 in sorghum and rice. Because of this translocation, the most useful sequence for comparison from maize is from the Adh2 gene found on maize chromosome 4 (which has not been sequenced). The authors have anchored their sequence region on one end with the Adh1-Ahd2 region, rather than centering the 340 kb region around those two genes. In the latter arrangement, more useful sequence comparisons could have been made between rice and the previously published sorghum and maize sequences. Unfortunately, because of this, most of the paper seems concerned with describing the putative genes and repetitive elements in the region. Perhaps a more useful approach would have been to take a number of the completely sequenced regions from the Rice Genome Project, and use molecular markers to isolate maize bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones for sequencing. Then direct sequence comparisons could be made both at the single-gene level and at the level of genome organization.