A global view of gene expression in lithium and zinc treated sea urchin embryos: new components of gene regulatory networks
© Poustka et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 15 January 2007
Accepted: 16 May 2007
Published: 16 May 2007
The genome of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus has recently been sequenced because it is a major model system for the study of gene regulatory networks. Embryonic expression patterns for most genes are unknown, however.
Using large-scale screens on arrays carrying 50% to 70% of all genes, we identified novel territory-specific markers. Our strategy was based on computational selection of genes that are differentially expressed in lithium-treated embryos, which form excess endomesoderm, and in zinc-treated embryos, in which endomesoderm specification is blocked. Whole-mount in situ hybridization (WISH) analysis of 700 genes indicates that the apical organ region is eliminated in lithium-treated embryos. Conversely, apical and specifically neural markers are expressed more broadly in zinc-treated embryos, whereas endomesoderm signaling is severely reduced. Strikingly, the number of serotonergic neurons is amplified by at least tenfold in zinc-treated embryos. WISH analysis further indicates that there is crosstalk between the Wnt (wingless int), Notch, and fibroblast growth factor signaling pathways in secondary mesoderm cell specification and differentiation, similar to signaling cascades that function during development of presomitic mesoderm in mouse embryogenesis. We provide differential expression data for more than 4,000 genes and WISH patterns of more than 250 genes, and more than 2,400 annotated WISH images.
Our work provides tissue-specific expression patterns for a large fraction of the sea urchin genes that have not yet been included in existing regulatory networks and await functional integration. Furthermore, we noted neuron-inducing activity of zinc on embryonic development; this is the first observation of such activity in any organism.
Body plan development is controlled by large gene regulatory networks (GRNs). Such networks consist of components that accurately specify cell fate at defined times during development via their physical interaction, or in the case of transcription factors via their binding to cis-regulatory DNA elements. One of the best studied developmental GRNs is the sea urchin endomesoderm GRN, which includes almost 50 genes [1, 2]. These genes were uncovered in part through three array screens: a subtractive screen, in which RNA from lithium-treated embryos was subtracted with RNA isolated from cadherin injected embryos ; a Brachyury target gene screen ; and a screen for pigment cell-specific genes . Comparison of the endoderm network between vertebrates (mouse, xenopus, and zebrafish) showed that many components have been conserved. Common key zygotic factors are the Nodal-related transforming growth factor-β ligands, the Mixlike (paired box) family of homeodomain transcription factors, the Gata4/Gata5/Gata6 zinc-finger transcription factors and the HMG box transcription factor Sox17 [6–10]. Orthologs of some of these genes are components of the sea urchin endomesoderm GRN. Examples include SpGataE and SpGataC (orthologs of Gata4/Gata5/Gata6 and Gata1/Gata2/Gata3, respectively), SpFoxA (ortholog of FoxA1 [HNF3b], which in Xenopus is a target of Mixer), and SpOtx (ortholog of Otx2, which in Xenopus is induced by Sox17). However, comparison of the vertebrate and sea urchin endomesoderm network also reveals that many sea urchin orthologs of vertebrate endomesoderm genes are absent from the respective sea urchin GRN.
This could be due to the fact that the existing sea urchin endomesoderm GRN is built progressively, starting from genes found to be regulated in the initial screens; this raises the possibility that nodes of the endomesoderm network that are not affected by the above subtractive hybridizations have not yet been explored. In addition, some genes employed in the sea urchin endomesoderm GRN are apparently absent from vertebrate endomesoderm GRNs. The aim of this study is to identify additional genes that are associated with developmental patterning, primarily focusing on endomesoderm specific genes but also on genes that are involved in ectoderm differentiation and patterning. We then add these genes to the existing GRNs or create novel GRNs that describe sea urchin embryonic development.
The early sea urchin embryo develops two primary axes: the animal-vegetal axis and the oral-aboral axis. Most of the endodermal and mesodermal cells are derived from the vegetal half, whereas the animal cells contribute to neural and non-neural ectodermal territories. During gastrulation the ectoderm is divided into an oral side, which flattens and is the site where the mouth secondarily breaks through, and a rounded aboral side, which is seperated by the ciliary band region.
Activation of the sea urchin endomesoderm GRN is initiated at the molecular level as a result of nuclearization of β-catenin initially in the vegetal micromeres (at the fourth cleavage) and subsequently in the macromeres and their progenitor blastomeres veg2 and part of veg1. The nuclearization of β-catenin in the micromeres at the 16-cell stage is also the earliest molecular evidence of an animal-vegetal axis in Strongylocentrotus purpuratus [11–14].
Using these reagents we conducted separate array hybridizations of lithium chloride or zinc sulfate treated and normal embryos. Because lithium vegetalizes and zinc complementarily animalizes embryos, we would expect endomesoderm-specific genes to be upregulated in embryos treated with lithium and downregulated in embryos treated with zinc sulfate, whereas ectoderm-specific genes should exhibit the opposite pattern.
Hybridizations were carried out on nonredundant arrays that correspond to 50% to 70% of all sea urchin genes . In our experimental design we have used repetitions of experiments in order to calculate sensitivity as a factor of reproducibility. We deliberately did not amplify or subtract any probes, because these procedures run the risk for distorting the representation of different sequences in the RNA sample. In addition, they can interfere with the identification of (for instance, they may remove) highly expressed genes, which can also be territory specific markers. Differentially expressed genes were analyzed by whole-mount in situ hybridization (WISH) from early blastula stages (10 hours) to the pluteus stage (90 hours) during normal embryonic development, and certain identified marker genes were also analyzed for expression in treated embryos. In this way we identified key molecules of endomesoderm and oral-aboral axis differentiation, novel territories, and new highly dynamic expression patterns in the sea urchin embryo. A total of about 700 out of more than 4.000 differentially expressed genes representing all functional protein classes have thus far been analyzed by WISH. All WISHs were annotated and deposited in a database that is freely accessible . The differential expression data are available in the Array Screens Database . As the screens progress, this database will continue to be expanded.
Strategy for expression profiling
We generated a robust strategy for profiling the expression of genes differentially expressed during early development in sea urchin. We compared the conditions of embryos vegetalized by lithium treatment (excess endomesoderm) and animalized by zinc treatment (excess ectodermal territories). Expression profiles were established for embryos at different developmental stages. They were established for the midblastula stage at 20 hours after fertilization for lithium-vegetalized embryos and at a midgastrula stage for zinc treatment (38 hours; see Materials and methods, below, for treatment details). We decided to analyze the expression profile of a midgastrula stage of development (38 hours) for the animalized embryos because it is at this stage that a first phenotypic effect becomes visible (a thickened animal plate and the absence of gut structures). In addition, the use of a later stage is also useful for establishing an expression profile catalog throughout development (Poustka AJ, unpublished data).
For expression profiling experiments to be valid, they must exhibit good sensitivity and reproducibility; hence in order to identify significantly regulated genes, it is necessary to generate enough data points to allow reliable statistical analyses to be conducted.
RNA was isolated from embryos subjected to treatment and control embryos simultaneously, and was hybridized simultaneously on 12 array copies in order to prevent differences resulting from discrepant handling procedures. For each probe, six different filter copies were hybridized (for each experiment) to collect 24 data points per clone (each clone is spotted in duplicate). This high number of repetitions enables the calculation of reproducibility values based on the coefficient of variation of the replicate signal intensities for each cDNA clone. The statistical tests (Student's t-test 1, Welch test, Wilcoxon test, and a permutation-based test) were calculated for all clones. A total of 3,456 copies of an Arabidopsis clone were used to adapt the P values, ensuring that an experimental false-positive rate of 5% is not exceeded (for details, see Herwig and coworkers ).
In order to minimize measurement error resulting from cross-talk between neighboring spots, we made two different arrays for each set of clones with two different spotting patterns, both of which are used in each experiment. Arrays were made on nylon filters carrying polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification products of the inserts of 35,238 cDNA clones, representing about 20,000 genes of the sea urchin S. purpuratus. This set of clones was selected as a low-redundancy set, as indicated by normalization by oligonucleotide fingerprinting and expressed sequence tag (EST) analysis . A re-evaluation with the now available draft of the sea urchin genome sequence verifies that the established gene catalog contains a tag for more than 50% of all sea urchin genes. Out of a total of 28,944 predicted sea urchin gene models (Glean3) , 14,638 do not match an EST sequence, which would mean that almost 50% of the gene predictions are already covered by an EST. Of the 27,217 EST clusters, however, 10,698 do reversely not match any Glean3 gene prediction. This indicates that, as expected, untranslated region sequences are not properly predicted in the Glean3 gene set and hence that the number of sea urchin genes tagged in our EST catalog is well over 50%.
Lithium-zinc in silicosubtraction and performance evaluation
A total of 6,581 clones were identified as being differentially expressed, according to the criteria described in the Materials and methods (below; all data are available at the sea urchin embryo WISH database ). We estimate that these clones represent about 4,000 different genes, based on comparison with the gene predictions (Glean3) of the recently completed sea urchin genome sequence . Because lithium vegetalizes and zinc complementarily animalizes embryos, we would expect endomesoderm-specific genes to be upregulated in lithium-treated embryos and simultaneously downregulated in zinc-treated embryos, whereas ectoderm-specific genes should exhibit the opposite pattern. We selected 81 clones that are upregulated in the hybridizations with lithium chloride-treated embryos and downregulated in the hybridizations with zinc sulfate-treated embryos (referred to hereafter as 'LiUpZiDown' clones) and 151 LiDownZiUp clones, of which 39 and 101 clones, respectively, were analyzed by WISH. Whereas the percentage of these clones giving restricted expression patterns was very high (61% and 68% for LiUpZiDown and LiDownZiUp, respectively), the localization results were striking. Of the clones predicted to be localized to the endomesoderm domain from the LiUpZiDown fraction, 96% were indeed localized to an endomesodermal domain during embryogenesis. Likewise, only 19% of the LiDownZiUp group localized to an endomesodermal domain, whereas the rest were expressed in an ectodermal domain.
Differential expression data based on array experiments and Q-PCR of endomesoderm marker genes
Q-PCR ratio ± error
1.08 × e-06
3.89 × e-03
1.64 ± 0.21
0.33 ± 0.10
3.98 × e-02
2.58 × e-03
1.78 ± 0.09
0.53 ± 0.04
5.68 × e-08
1.20 × e-03
0.44 ± 0.03
1.71 ± 0.50
1.64 × e-01
4.86 ± 1.05
0.95 ± 0.14
2.60 × e-05
0.03 ± 0.00
0.58 ± 0.26
3.00 × e-01
2.05 × e-04
1.76 ± 0.34
1.70 ± 0.12a
4.89 × e-03
0.93 ± 0.01a
1.73 ± 0.10
1.37 × e-06
3.18 ± 0.12
1.69 ± 0.43
2.77 × e-03
1.71 × e-03
3.06 ± 0.92
0.23 ± 0.04
3.99 × e-01
3.22 ± 0.53
0.33 ± 0.03
3.44 × e-09
1.90 ± 0.03
5.95 ± 0.66
5.17 × e-03
0.04 ± 0.01
4.84 × e-01
1.81 ± 0.18
13.5 ± 3.41
7.82 × e-01
3.43 × e-03
1.66 ± 0.33
2.14 ± 0.22
1.77 ± 0.29
0.50 ± 0.02
2.40 × e-04
0.81 ± 0.16
1.46 ± 0.27
Apical, later +EM
7.83 × e-02
6.46 × e-03
0.39 ± 0.04
1.15 ± 0.15a
1.09 × e-05
1.20 × e-04
1.07 ± 0.19a
18.12 ± 2.93
2.49 × e-01
0.52 ± 0.09
1.20 ± 0.32
9.72 × e-01
9.05 × e-05
0.24 ± 0.01
0.09 ± 0.01
EM, later +apical
4.23 × e-01
1.67 ± 0.21
1.05 ± 0.08
3.75 × e-02
4.24 ± 0.95a
4.61 ± 1.50
6.93 × e-01
1.40 ± 0.31a
2.18 ± 0.12
6.71 × e-05
1.78 × e-05
0.33 ± 0.15
0.16 ± 0.04
2.69 × e-07
5.52 × e-10
4,68 ± 0.72
11,01 ± 0,27
7.86 × e-01
2.29 ± 0.97a
0.09 ± 0.03
1.97 × e-01
6.31 ± 2.31
1.08 ± 0.08
4.19 × e-03
2.49 ± 0.07
11.36 ± 1.13
Differential expression data based on array experiments and Q-PCR of ectoderm marker genes
Q-PCR ratio ± error
3.13 × e-01
7.33 × e-01
1.27 ± 0.29
0.97 ± 0.25
4.55 × e-05
1.19 ± 0,19
0.41 ± 0,12
8.43 × e-01
4.13 × e-03
0.75 ± 0.08a
0.16 ± 0.06
1.91 × e-07
0.98 ± 0.22a
2.17 ± 0,14
1.34 ± 0,11
4.12 ± 0,23
2.51 × e-09
0.08 ± 0.05
1.60 ± 0.02
7.69 × e-08
0.15 ± 0.13
5.87 ± 0.15
10.64 ± 1.67
3.50 × e-12
0.12 ± 0.01
1.42 ± 0.24
1.41 × e-07
0.05 ± 0.02
1.03 ± 0.21
2.86 × e-02
3.26 × e-07
0.93 ± 0.20a
1.84 ± 0.04
3.55 × e-14
5.01 × e-07
0.15 ± 0.03
4.66 ± 0.78
2.99 × e-01
7.78 × e-07
1.20 ± 0.00
2.05 ± 0.15
Apical + SMC late
4.79 × e-01
3.24 × e-02
0.20 ± 0.06
1.11 ± 0.10
8.23 × e-02
1.76 ± 0.22a
1.39 ± 0.21
Radical spoke protein
5.75 × e-04
1.14 ± 0.10
2.11 ± 0.45
7.10 × e-04
3.67 × e-04
0.11 ± 0.04
2.14 ± 0.08
Cilliary band +?E
5.78 × e-06
0.62 ± 0.04
1.54 ± 0.25
3.20 × e-04
5.88 × e-03
0.68 ± 0.06
1.84 ± 0.24a
7.71 × e-01
3.72 ± 0.50
0.11 ± 0.02
Entire ectoderm, off vegetal
1.37 × e-08
3.83 × e-12
0.78 ± 0.26
9.11 ± 0.90
4.42 × e-07
1.25 × e-03
7.55 ± 0.55
11.42 ± 0.87
1.01 × e-04
0.96 ± 0.09
2.43 ± 0.14
9.93 × e-02
0.87 ± 0.05a
1.43 ± 0.27
6.71 × e-05
0.79 ± 0.12a
1.12 ± 0.27
7.72 × e-07
1.88 ± 0.13
1.73 ± 0.14
Differential expression data based on array experiments and Q-PCR of genes with unknown or ubiquitous expression pattern
7.29 × e-07
1.95 ± 0.15
2.07 ± 0.47
4.77 × e-03
0.85 ± 0.11
0.79 ± 0.16
2.55 × e-01
2.05 × e-02
2.03 ± 0.37
2.66 ± 0.40
1.18 × e-14
5.87 × e-03
0.05 ± 0.03
1.20 ± 0.32
7.88 × e-02
0.73 ± 0.13a
1.42 ± 0.29
8.13 × e-01
0.39 ± 0.13a
0.24 ± 0.12
6.69 × e-01
1.66 ± 0.36
1.73 ± 0.21
1.55 ± 0.19
0.24 ± 0.01
0.03 ± 0.02
0.29 ± 0.03
1.43 ± 0.29
1.30 ± 0.14
2.79 ± 0.81a
0.84 ± 0.12
Overall, we generated and compared differential expression data for 80 regulations (namely zinc or lithium) between array and Q-PCR data. In 17 cases the regulations were not in agreement, indicating an experimental false positive rate of 21% for the entire set of 6,581 differentially regulated clones (indicated by 'a' in Tables 1, 2, and 3).
To identify the biologic pathways affected by the treatments, we analyzed the expression data in terms of pathways. To sort sea urchin genes into pathways we mapped the ESTs of the regulated clones on our arrays to the predicted sea urchin genes (Glean3) of the recently sequenced genome  and then searched to determine whether their human orthologs are involved in pathways listed in the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway database . The results indicate a statistically significant differential regulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase and transforming growth factor-β pathway in zinc-treated embryos.
Expression profile with lithium chloride treatment
Thus far, of a total of 700 genes that were analyzed by WISH, selected from either of the expression profiling experiments, 151 localized to an endomesodermal domain. We identified 34 clones restricted to primary mesenchyme cells (PMCs), 92 to SMCs, and 98 to ectodermal cells, of which about half co-localize to more than one cell type. About 400 genes exhibited ubiquitous expression or expression was too low to allow any detection. More than 2,400 images from these WISHs have been annotated, with the results accessible in the sea urchin WISH database .
Zinc treatment expands the neuronal apical plate by downregulating vegetal signaling and oral markers, and upregulating aboral markers
We found 14 genes that specifically localized to the animal plate, some of which appear to localize specifically to neuronal cells of the apical organ. The Dp-Hbn (WISH database ) gene is initially expressed broadly in the animal plate and becomes cleared during gastrulation from the central region, forming a ring of expression around the apical organ. A similar ring-like expression, embracing the developing apical organ, is also observed for the six3 gene, which is later also expressed on the vegetal side (see above). Several genes are expressed exactly in the apical organ. These are the transcription factors FoxJ (WISH database ),FoxQ2 (Figure 6), Mox, glass (Figure 7), a zinc finger gene (hpf4; Figure 6), a radial spoke protein, the tubulin β-chain gene (WISH database ), several genes without clear homology to any known genes, and - strikingly - Sp-sFRP1/5, which is a secreted frizzled protein (Figure 6).
We have analyzed three transcription factors (FoxQ2, Mox, and glass) for co-expression with serotonin and show here that the transcription factor Mox is specific for serotonergic neurons, whereas the transcription factor glass, which in Drosophila is required for the differentiation and survival of photoreceptor sells , localizes to cells adjacent to serotonergic cells (Figure 8). FoxQ2 and Glass are expressed in the neurogenic ectoderm but not in serotonergic neurons. Using the FoxQ2 gene as marker of the apical organ and Mox as a marker for serotonergic cells in zinc-treated embryos, we found that the few cells forming the apical organ in the sea urchin embryo are markedly expanded in the zinc-treated embryos (Figure 6), whereas this recently described new territory  appears to be entirely eliminated in lithium-treated embryos (Figure 6). Furthermore, we find that the expanded apical plate is extremely enriched in serotonergic neurons, where about 30 serotonergic neurons form, as opposed to five or six in normal embryos (Figure 7).
In addition to upregulation of genes of the animal plate or the apical organ, we also find a significant number of upregulated genes that are expressed in the aboral ectoderm in normal embryos. In fact, no transcription factor has yet been identified that is exclusively expressed in the aboral ectoderm. However, the fact that there is a cytoskeletal gene (Spec2A ) that is exclusively expressed in the aboral ectoderm does argue that such factors should exist (although post-transcriptional or combinatorial mechanisms of control of gene activity cannot be ruled out). As a control, we measured Spec2a expression in zinc-treated embryos and find that it is about tenfold upregulated (Table 2). One transcription factor that is expressed in the aboral ectoderm but that is also expressed in other territories is the T-box gene Tbx2/3 [15, 33]. This gene was found to be significantly downregulated (Table 2; namely, clone RUDIREA_28I11, which is downregulated by a factor of 0.20; P = 3.50e-12) in lithium-treated embryos and is upregulated in zinc-treated embryos. We found two other transcription factors, namely IrxA (Irx4/5) of the Iroquois gene family and Nkx2.2 in the highly significant group in zinc-treated embryos. Both genes (as illustrated in Figure 6) are expressed in the aboral ectoderm, starting at very early stages, and expand their expression toward the oral side of the vegetal half during gastrulation in normal embryos. Hence, we propose that these transcription factors are essential components of the regulatory network that controls oral-aboral ectoderm differentiation. Because many aboral genes are upregulated in zinc-treated embryos, one would expect a downregulation of oral specific genes. This was found to be the case for the oral specific genes chordin (its antagonist Bmp2/4, also orally expressed, is not significantly differentially expressed) and goosecoid, but not for nodal and its antagonist lefty (see Discussion and conclusions, below).
Via a series of targeted array screens, we identified 250 genes exhibiting a restricted expression pattern. An analysis of global gene expression using whole-genome tiling arrays indicates that 9,000 genes are expressed in the sea urchin embryo . Previous random WISH screens across multiple organisms have concluded that 20% of all genes assessed had a restricted expression pattern [35, 36]. This could mean that perhaps 1,800 sea urchin genes are expressed in specific tissues during embryonic development. We hence assume that the genes identified thus far and the additional differentially expressed genes that have not yet been analyzed represent a significant portion of all tissue-specific sea urchin genes. This assumption provides the rationale for using our approach of combined array-WISH screens to unravel new candidate genes of GRNs, ultimately to move toward a global systems level understanding of sea urchin embryogenesis.
Neuronal identity, apical plate, and zinc treatment
Among the genes that we found to be upregulated in zinc-treated embryos is the homeobox transcription factor gene mox, which is a member of the extended hox complex in humans , which in vertebrates has been found to be involved in mesoderm development [38, 39]. By simultaneous WISH and immunohistochemical localization with serotonin, we could show that Mox is expressed in serotonergic neurons in the apical plate (Figure 8). Hence, this is the first transcription factor identified in sea urchin embryos that is expressed specifically by serotonergic cells; furthermore, its pattern of expression is consistent with its functioning in neuronal specification. It is also the first time that a mox ortholog had been found to be expressed by neurons in any organism. WISH analysis of mox in zinc-treated embryos revealed an apparent expansion of expression of mox in these embryos. Consistent with this, immunohistochemical localization of serotonin in zinc-treated embryos revealed an increase in the number of serotonergic neurons (Figure 7). Although two other transcription factors, expressed in the apical plate (FoxQ2 and glass), were found to be negative for expression in serotonergic neurons, it remains possible that they are expressed by one of the other types of neurons of the apical organ. The transcription factor glass is required for the differentiation and survival of photoreceptor cells in Drosophila . In the sea urchin, glass is expressed in cells adjacent to serotonergic neurons. The structure of photoreceptors in sea urchins is not known, but it is presumed to involve sensory neurons and lack image-forming specializations. Thus, the apical organ may contain photoreceptors. However, there are no published data demonstrating that urchin embryos and larvae are responsive to photic cues.
The secreted frizzled-related protein gene Sp-sFRP1/5, selected because of being upregulated in zinc-treated embryos and downregulated in lithium-treated embryos, is also expressed exclusively in the apical plate and later in the apical organ (Figure 6). Secreted frizzled proteins are potent and highly specific inhibitors of Wnt signaling because they lack membrane domains and strongly compete with the Wnts on their receptors (frizzleds) . This finding is an indication that downregulation of Wnt signaling may be a requirement for apical organ formation and neurogenesis, and one of the possible actions of zinc treatment on embryogenesis. A second finding, namely that aboral genes are upregulated in zinc-treated embryos, suggests that oral specific genes may be downregulated. This was found to be the case for the oral-specific genes chordin and goosecoid. However, other oral expressed genes exhibit a different pattern of regulation. As an example, the chordin antagonist Bmp2/4 is not differentially expressed, whereas nodal and its antagonist lefty are upregulated (see Q-PCR data in Table 2). This finding appears to contradict a recent finding that Nodal signaling, in the absence of vegetal signaling, represses the serotonergic cell content in the embryo ; hence, further investigation into the roles of BMP and nodal signaling, and expansion of the animal plate is required. The screens for zinc-treated embryos were conducted at a stage where normal embryos are at the gastrula stage (38 hours) and oral expression of nodal and lefty are downregulated in the oral ectoderm at this stage (expression shifts to the right side ). Hence, nodal and lefty may not be useful oral markers at this stage, and it is better to rely on chordin and goosecoid, which remain orally expressed until the end of gastrulation. Alternatively, there may be interactions between transforming growth factor-β signaling pathways, or the zinc-treated embryos may undergo a recovery process that leads to elevated expression of early patterning genes. Because many of the differentially expressed genes have not been analyzed in detail, we expect that there are additional genes that are involved in neurogenesis.
TBX6, Notch, fibroblast growth factor, and Wnt signaling in SMC specification
In the sea urchin, induction of the mesodermal founder cells that give rise to the secondary mesenchyme cells of the embryo (SMCs; for example, pigment cells and blastocoelar cells) require a signal transduced by the Notch receptor [43–46]. This signal is the Delta ligand, which is expressed by the eight large micromere daughter cells beginning at the seventh cleavage . The Delta signal is received directly by the adjacent cells of the macromere lineage. Our screen has identified fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling components Tbx6 and snail as components of SMC-specific gene expression (Figure 4). This signaling cascade reveals striking similarities in gene expression between sea urchin SMC cells and mouse presomitic mesoderm. In the mouse embryo Tbx6 is expressed in presomitic mesoderm during mouse gastrulation [48, 49]. Studies have shown that Wnt signaling, in synergy with T/TBX6, controls Notch signaling by regulating Delta1 (Dll1) expression in the presomitic mesoderm of mouse embryos by demonstrating the need for T-box-binding and LEF/TCF-binding sites for activity of the Dll1 promoter in the tailbud and presomitic mesoderm. This suggests that T/TBX6 and Wnt signaling directly and synergistically regulate Dll1 transcription in the tailbud and presomitic mesoderm in mouse . In addition, T-box transcription factors, as well as FGF and Wnt signaling, are essential regulators of formation, differentiation, and maintenance of paraxial mesoderm in mouse embryos, because mutations in T, Fgfr1, wnt3a, and Tbx6 cause defects in formation and differentiation of paraxial mesoderm [51–53].
Thus, it appears that several levels of crosstalk exist between the Notch, the Wnt, and the FGF pathways in somitogenesis in the mouse. The co-expression of Tbx6, FGFR1, and FGFR3 (this report) and delta  in sea urchin embryo suggests that during sea urchin SMC specification, differentiation, or maintainance, highly similar processes function as in mesenchymal epithelial transition of mouse presomitic mesoderm to somites. Hence, we propose that in sea urchin there may exist a feed-forward loop, in which Tbx6 and Wnt may act in synergy to activate delta to control Notch signaling in SMC differentiation. Moreover, we also found the transcription factor Prox1 to be co-expressed with FGFR3. This indicates that, like in mouse, FGFR3 may be a target of Prox1 . Interestingly, a PKCdelta1 gene is expressed in migrating SMC cells. In the Xenopus embryo it has been shown that PKCdelta is essential for dishevelled function in a noncanonical Wnt pathway that regulates convergent extension movements . This indicates that noncanonical Wnt signaling is involved in cell migration and convergent extension movements during sea urchin embryogenesis and further indicates that there exists crosstalk between Wnt, Notch, and FGF signalling in secondary mesenchyme (SMC) specification and differentiation.
Evolution of axial patterning
In the development of bilaterian animals, the indirect mode of development is regarded to be ancestral because it occurs in deuterostomes (echinoderms and hemichordates) and protostomes (lophotrochozoans), but in chordates (and ecdysozoan protostomes) indirect modes of development appear to have been lost during evolution . Indirect development (also referred to as maximal indirect development) is characterized by use of a larval stage, the body patterning of which is essentially different from the body patterning of the adult . The comparative study of gene expression patterns in the larvae of protostomes (for instance, annelid trochophora) and deuterostomes (for example, sea urchin dipleurula type) is a key step toward gaining insights into the Urbilateria, the common bilaterian ancestors. For example, comparison of gene expression between three patterning genes in indirect developing lophotrochozoan embryos and their counterparts in vertebrates and basal deuterostomes suggests that the Urbilateria has developed through a free swimming larva .
Gene expression data in lophotrochozoan larvae are still few, and gene expression studies in indirect developing basal deuterostomes are also in their infancy; hence, this study aims to close the gap.
There are several parallels between the organizer region of other animals and the vegetal pole of sea urchin. For example, in all cases this is the site of gastrulation as well as the source of axial specification signals that are capable of reorganizing surrounding tissue upon transplantation. Chordin and nodal are molecules classically associated with organizer and dorsal axis specification; in particular, chordin was used to interpret the expression on the ventral side in flies as possible proof of an axis inversion that happened during the evolution of tribloblastic animals. In fact, ecdysozoans are very derived animals with a direct mode of development that is regarded not to be ancestral . The derived state of ecdysozoans is reflected by the recent finding that diploblastic cnidarians may share more genes with vertebrates than they do with ecdysozoans . In sea urchin embryo we have an example in which the gene expression pattern of chordin and the organizer-like region are dissociated. One could view this finding as an indication that the vegetal plate is not the only organizer region in sea urchin embryo, but that the oral ectoderm also has organizer functions, perhaps similar to head and trunk organizer in vertebrates. Moreover, the classical dorso-ventral patterning genes chordin (Figure 6) and nodal, and their antagonists BMP2/4 and lefty/antivin [16, 42], respectively, are all expressed at the same time on the same side of the embryo, in the oral ectoderm, and this may have further implications for the evolution of axial patterning. Even more strikingly, a recent analysis of dorso-ventral genes in the cnidarian Nematostella vectensis has revealed a similar situation in which, unlike in flies and vertebrates, the transforming growth factor-β ligands and their antagonists are co-localized at the onset of gastrulation in presumptive endoderm .
It is therefore imperative to analyze the development of indirect developing organisms in order to analyze axis relationships between protostomes and deuterostomes.
We predict that chordin will be expressed on the ventral side of lophotrochozoan embryos as well, which would indicate that the bilaterian ancestor developed through a swimming larva, similar to types of larvae that can be found in basal deuterostomes, such as echinoderms and hemichordates and prototypic protostomes, the lophotrochozoans.
Such a result would also mean that an axis inversion could not have taken place at the time point in evolution when the tribloblastic world arose, but rather at the time when chordates arose. Expression and GRN architecture analysis of the chordin molecule and other dorso-ventral patterning genes in lophotrochozoan embryos and in amphioxus will clarify this interesting aspect of bilaterian evolution.
Materials and methods
Embryo cultures and treatments
The fertilized eggs were grown at a maximal density of 1 to 2 × 107 eggs/liter (1% to 2% volume; 1 ml settled eggs roughly equals 106 eggs/embryos, so no more than 10,000/ml) in filtered seawater in 1 to 3 liter beakers. The antibiotics penicillin (20 units/ml) and streptomycin (50 μg/ml) were added to cultures that were to be grown for longer than 15 hours. The cultures were kept at 16°C with continuous stirring.
For lithium chloride treatment embryos were cultured in seawater containing a 30 mmol/l end concentration of lithium chloride, which was added after egg activation (namely at the two-cell stage). For expression profiling we used the midblastula stage at 20 hours of development. Zinc sulfate treatments to animalize the embryos were performed as described by Nemer and coworkers . Expression profiling was performed on 38-hour embryos.
WISH, TWISH, and immunohistochemical localization of serotonin
Fixation of embryos and WISH was performed in accordance with the method described by Minokawa and coworkers  or as described previously . Tyramide signal amplification (TSA) with whole mount in situ RNA hybridization (TWISH) and immunohistochemical localization of serotonin was performed in accordance with the method described by Yaguchi and Katow . The anti-serotonin antibody used was made in rabbits and obtained from Sigma (Munich, Bavaria, Germany) (product number S5545). As secondary antibodies we used anti-Rabbit (IgG)-Alexa594 (red) from Molecular Probes (product number A-11037) and anti-Rabbit (IgG)-Alexa488 (green) from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR, USA, product number A-11034).
Plasmid inserts of 35,238 cDNA clones representing about 20,000 genes of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus  were PCR amplified in a 30 μl volume in 384-well plates. PCR was performed in 1 × PCR buffer, with 0.1 mmol/l primer, 200 mmol/l of each dNTP, 1.5 mol/l betain, and 2 to 3 units Taq polymerase. As vector specific primers, M13 forward: 5'-GCTATTATGCCAGCTGGCGAAAGGGGGATGTG-3' and 3/86: 5'-CCGGTCCGGAATTCCCGGGT-3' were used to amplify the inserts. Ready PCR mix was inoculated with a bacterial suspension using a replicator. PCR was performed for 30 cycles with the following cycle profile: 20 s denaturation at 94°C followed by a one-step 210 s annealing and extension step at 65°C.
DNA was transferred to dry Hybond N+ Nylon membranes using in-house build spotting robots. Filters were fixed to tiles using sticky bands. Each DNA was spotted seven times. Pin diameter used was 250 μm, and the spot distance was 900 μm in the common 5 × 5 pattern (each clone in duplicate) . After spotting filters were denatured by 2 × 5 min soaking on whatman paper weatend with 0.4 mol/l NaOH followed by 2 × 5 min denaturation on whatman paper soaked with 0.5 mol/l NaH2PO4 (pH 7.2). Filters were air dried overnight and cross-linked twice at 12 J/cm2 using the UV Stratalinker 2400 (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA).
Embryos were dissociated in 20 volumes Trizol (Gibco BRL Life Technologies, Rockville, MD, USA), shockfrozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C until use. For RNA isolation the sample was defrosted in a 65°C waterbath, 0.2 ml chloroform/ml Trizol was added, and the mixture was shaken for 15 s, followed by an additional 5 min at room temperature. The samples were subsequently balanced and then centrifuged at 12,000 g for 15 min at 4°C in a Sorvall SS34 rotor in silinized RNAse free glass tubes. Supernatant was transferred to a new RNAse free tube and 0.5 ml isopropanol/1 ml Trizol added. After thorough mixing, the sample was stored for 10 min at room temperature followed by a 10 min spin, as above. The RNA pellet was then washed with 20 ml of 75% ice-cold ethanol and spun for 5 min at 7,500 g at 4°C. The pellet was air dried for 10 min and re-suspended in 500 μl RNAse free water. The integrity of the RNA was analyzed by gel electrophoresis and its concentration was determined spectrophotometrically. RNA was aliquoted and stored at -80°C.
For poly A selection, the PolyATract mRNA Isolation System III (Promega, Mannheim, Germany) was used, in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Usually, 8 to 10 μg poly A RNA was obtained from 1 mg total RNA. RNA concentration was determined spectrophotometrically. A typical labeling reaction was carried out with 1 μg poly A RNA (used for two filters). One microgram of poly A RNA concentrated in a volume of 8 μl was mixed with 1 μl of random primer hexamers (Gibco BRL; 2.5 μg/μl), denatured for 10 min at 70°C, and immediately placed on ice. Subsequently, the following was added: 1 μl RNasin (Promega), 1.5 μl cMix, 6 μl 5 × reverse transcriptase buffer, 3 μl 0.1 mol/l DTT, 7 μl α- [P-33] dCTP (70 μCi), and 2 μl Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Gibco BRL). The mixture was mixed well and incubated at 37°C for 2 hours. Incorporation was measured by running 1 μl on a PEI paper followed by capturing intensities by scanning on a phosphorimager. ImageQuant software (GE Healthcare, Munich, Germany) was used to measure the ratio of incorporated versus unincorporated nucleotides. The rate of incorporation is usually more than 90%. Probe was denatured by addition of 10 μl 5 mol/l NaOH. Hybridizations were carried out in modified Church buffer at a probe concentration of 100 ng/ml in a 10 ml volume, with two filters separated by a nylon mesh in one bottle at 65°C for 20 hours. Bottles were carefully cleaned with 1 mol/l NaOH before use. After hybridization, filters were washed four times in 1 l wash solution containing 40 ml of 0.5 mol/l NaH2PO4 (pH 7.2), 10 ml 10% SDS, and 2 ml 0.5 mol/l EDTA, twice at room temperature and twice at 65°C. Filters were then wrapped in saran wrap without any wrinkles, exposed for 10 hours, and scanned at 100 μm resolution using the Fuji BAS 1800 phosphorimager.
Gene expression data were normalized as described previously . The validity of gene expression of each individual signal was judged by comparison with a negative control sample. In order to verify whether a given gene was significantly expressed, we compared its signal with a signal distribution derived from negative controls. In our array design, we distributed about 6,000 empty spot positions on the array. After quantification, a small, non-zero intensity was assigned to each empty spot, reflecting the amount of background signal on the array. Because these positions were spread uniformly over the array, the distribution of signals reflects a global background distribution for the experiment and indicates whether cDNA signals were at or above the background level of expression. For each cDNA, we counted the relative proportion of empty positions on the array that were smaller than the observed intensity (background tag [BG]). Background-tags from replicated experiments for the same cDNA were averaged. Thus, high values (close to 1) indicated that the cDNA was expressed in the tissue tested, whereas low values reflected noise. cDNAs were considered 'expressed' when their average background-tag was above 0.9, a threshold consistent with the limit of visual detection of the spots.
For each cDNA, we performed statistical tests based on the replicate signals in experiments with treated and untreated samples. Four standard tests were used in parallel: Student's t-test, the Welch test, Wilcoxon's rank-sum test, and a permutation-based test .
To analyze pathways based on gene expression signals, we tested whether the entire group of genes associated with specific pathways exhibited differential expression across treated and untreated conditions. We mapped the sea urchin genes via the glean3 protein predictions of the sea urchin genome  to the human ensemble genes (National Center for Biotechnology Information version 36) and those to HUGO via reciprocal blast. Symbols that are grouped into Kyoto Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways (version 18.05.2006) were used to analyze pathway-specific differential regulation of sea urchin genes. The procedure computes a nonparametric test for the groups of genes organized in pathways and judges which pathways are affected by the treatment. This is described in detail elsewhere . All array data can be found in the Array Screens Database .
Quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA was isolated from embryos subjected to 20 hours of lithium treatment embryos and from those subjected to 38 hours of zinc treatment, as well as from untreated embryos at corresponding time points by extraction with Trizol (Gibco BRL), following the manufacturer's instructions. The integrity of the resulting RNAs was analyzed by gel electrophoresis. In case of DNA contamination, RNAs were DNAse treated using the TURBO DNA-free® Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). cDNA was transcribed with random hexamers and 1 μg total RNA using M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega). The cDNAs were used as Q-PCR templates to determine mRNA transcript levels of several genes in embryos at the embryonic stages mentioned above. Quantitative real-time PCR measurements were performed on an ABI 7900 HT Detection System using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (ABI, Foster City, CA, USA) with the following thermal cycling parameters: 50°C for 2 min and 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min. To determine the expression of a specific gene, SpZ12-1 amplification for normalizing measurements of the absolute number of transcripts of the gene as well as ubiquitin amplifications as an amplification reliability standard were also carried out on the same sample. Each PCR reaction was performed in triplicate.
A threshold was arbitrarily set within the exponential range of the amplification process so that different samples could be compared in terms of the number of cycles required to attain the threshold (CT, threshold cycle) when considering the same marker gene. The Q-PCR primer sequences used to determine the amount of transcripts of a specific gene can be found in Additional data file 2. Gel electrophoresis and dissociation curve were used to confirm product. Primer efficiency was found to be around 1.96. The average CT value obtained for the gene of interest (CTGOI) was normalized to the average CT value acquired on the same control cDNA preparations with SpZ12-1 primers (CTSpZ12): ΔCT = CTGOI - CTSpZ12. The exact number of transcripts per untreated embryo of the specific gene at 20 hours and 38 hours respectively (QGOI) was calculated using the known values described by Wang and coworkers  and Minokawa and colleagues  for SpZ12-1 at the same stages (QSpZ12): QGOI = QSpZ12 × 1.96-ΔCT.
The ratio of gene expression between treated and untreated embryos was calculated as follows. First, the average CT value of the specific gene (CTGOI) was normalized to the average CT value acquired with ubiquitin primers (CTUbq) on cDNA obtained from untreated embryos (ΔCT [con] = CTGOI [con] - CTUbq [con]) as well as on cDNA obtained from treated embryos (ΔCT [tre] = CTGOI [tre] - CTUbq [tre]). The ratio was then determined by using the difference in normalized CT values: rGOI(tre/con) = 1.96ΔCT(con)-ΔCT(tre). To determine the exact number of transcripts of the specific gene per treated embryo, the ratio found was multiplied by the exact number of transcripts of the same gene in the control embryo, as calculated previously: QGOI(tre) = rGOI(tre/con) × QGOI(con). The numbers given in the figures and tables are averages of the results of at least two independent experiments using two different batches of cDNA.
Databases and database management
Additional data files
The following additional data are available with the online version of this paper. Additional data file 1 provides a figure with WISH images of 88 endomesoderm genes in Strongylocentrotus purpuratus embryos at blastula stage (20 hours). Additional data file 2 provides a table summarizing the sequences of the used Q-PCR primers, amplicon size, and melting temperatures.
We thank Drs Matthew Clark and Pia Aanstad for discussions during the course of this project and help with experimental design. Furthermore, we thank Florian Thiel for help with the WISH database, Dr Andrew Hufton for careful reading of the manuscript, and Professor Bernhard G Herrmann for valuable suggestions. We thank Drs George Weinstock and Erica Sodergren, and the Baylor College of Medicine (Human Genome Sequencing Center, Houston, TX, USA) for access to the S. purpuratus genome sequence before scientific publication. This work was supported by the Max-Planck Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V. and by the Network of Excellence Marine Genomics of the European Union contract N° 505430.
- Davidson EH, Rast JP, Oliveri P, Ransick A, Calestani C, Yuh CH, Minokawa T, Amore G, Hinman V, Arenas-Mena C, et al: A provisional regulatory gene network for specification of endomesoderm in the sea urchin embryo. Dev Biol. 2002, 246: 162-190. 10.1006/dbio.2002.0635.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Davidson EH, Rast JP, Oliveri P, Ransick A, Calestani C, Yuh CH, Minokawa T, Amore G, Hinman V, Arenas-Mena C, et al: A genomic regulatory network for development. Science. 2002, 295: 1669-1678. 10.1126/science.1069883.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ransick A, Rast JP, Minokawa T, Calestani C, Davidson EH: New early zygotic regulators expressed in endomesoderm of sea urchin embryos discovered by differential array hybridization. Dev Biol. 2002, 246: 132-147. 10.1006/dbio.2002.0607.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rast JP, Cameron RA, Poustka AJ, Davidson EH: brachyury Target genes in the early sea urchin embryo isolated by differential macroarray screening. Dev Biol. 2002, 246: 191-208. 10.1006/dbio.2002.0654.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Calestani C, Rast JP, Davidson EH: Isolation of pigment cell specific genes in the sea urchin embryo by differential macroarray screening. Development. 2003, 130: 4587-4596. 10.1242/dev.00647.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sinner D, Kirilenko P, Rankin S, Wei E, Howard L, Kofron M, Heasman J, Woodland HR, Zorn AM: Global analysis of the transcriptional network controlling Xenopus endoderm formation. Development. 2006, 133: 1955-1966. 10.1242/dev.02358.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Loose M, Patient R: A genetic regulatory network for Xenopus mesendoderm formation. Dev Biol. 2004, 271: 467-478. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.04.014.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stainier DY: A glimpse into the molecular entrails of endoderm formation. Genes Dev. 2002, 16: 893-907. 10.1101/gad.974902.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tam PP, Kanai-Azuma M, Kanai Y: Early endoderm development in vertebrates: lineage differentiation and morphogenetic function. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2003, 13: 393-400. 10.1016/S0959-437X(03)00085-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xanthos JB, Kofron M, Wylie C, Heasman J: Maternal VegT is the initiator of a molecular network specifying endoderm in Xenopus laevis. Development. 2001, 128: 167-180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Emily-Fenouil F, Ghiglione C, Lhomond G, Lepage T, Gache C: GSK3beta/shaggy mediates patterning along the animal-vegetal axis of the sea urchin embryo. Development. 1998, 125: 2489-2498.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wikramanayake AH, Huang L, Klein WH: beta-Catenin is essential for patterning the maternally specified animal-vegetal axis in the sea urchin embryo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95: 9343-9348. 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9343.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Logan CY, Miller JR, Ferkowicz MJ, McClay DR: Nuclear beta-catenin is required to specify vegetal cell fates in the sea urchin embryo. Development. 1999, 126: 345-357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vonica A, Weng W, Gumbiner BM, Venuti JM: TCF is the nuclear effector of the beta-catenin signal that patterns the sea urchin animal-vegetal axis. Dev Biol. 2000, 217: 230-243. 10.1006/dbio.1999.9551.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Croce J, Duloquin L, Lhomond G, McClay DR, Gache C: Frizzled5/8 is required in secondary mesenchyme cells to initiate archenteron invagination during sea urchin development. Development. 2006, 133: 547-557. 10.1242/dev.02218.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Duboc V, Rottinger E, Besnardeau L, Lepage T: Nodal and BMP2/4 signaling organizes the oral-aboral axis of the sea urchin embryo. Dev Cell. 2004, 6: 397-410. 10.1016/S1534-5807(04)00056-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Angerer LM, Oleksyn DW, Levine AM, Li X, Klein WH, Angerer RC: Sea urchin goosecoid function links fate specification along the animal-vegetal and oral-aboral embryonic axes. Development. 2001, 128: 4393-4404.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lallier R: Effect of cadmium and zinc ions on the development of the sea-urchin egg (Paracentrotus lividus) [in French]. Arch Biol (Liege). 1955, 66: 75-102.Google Scholar
- Lallier R: Heavy metal ions and the problem of embryonic determination in echinoderms [in French]. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1956, 4: 265-278.Google Scholar
- Timourian H: The effect of zinc on sea urchin morphogenesis. J Exp Zool. 1968, 169: 121-132. 10.1002/jez.1401690114.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Poustka AJ, Groth D, Hennig S, Thamm S, Cameron A, Beck A, Reinhardt R, Herwig R, Panopoulou G, Lehrach H: Generation, annotation, evolutionary analysis, and database integration of 20,000 unique sea urchin EST clusters. Genome Res. 2003, 13: 2736-2746. 10.1101/gr.1674103.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- The Sea Urchin Embryo Whole Mount In Situ Hybridisation Database. [http://goblet.molgen.mpg.de/eugene/cgi/eugene.pl]
- The Sea Urchin Embryo Array Screen Database. [http://goblet.molgen.mpg.de/cgi-bin/seaurchin-hybsbase.cgi]
- Herwig R, Aanstad P, Clark M, Lehrach H: Statistical evaluation of differential expression on cDNA nylon arrays with replicated experiments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29: E117-10.1093/nar/29.23.e117.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sodergren E, Weinstock GM, Davidson EH, Cameron RA, Gibbs RA, Angerer RC, Angerer LM, Arnone MI, Burgess DR, Burke RD, et al: The genome of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Science. 2006, 314: 941-952. 10.1126/science.1133609.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- The KEGG Pathway Database. [http://www.genome.jp/kegg/pathway.html]
- Howard EW, Newman LA, Oleksyn DW, Angerer RC, Angerer LM: SpKrl: a direct target of beta-catenin regulation required for endoderm differentiation in sea urchin embryos. Development. 2001, 128: 365-375.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ransick A, Ernst S, Britten RJ, Davidson EH: Whole mount in situ hybridization shows Endo 16 to be a marker for the vegetal plate territory in sea urchin embryos. Mech Dev. 1993, 42: 117-124. 10.1016/0925-4773(93)90001-E.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Verschueren K, Remacle JE, Collart C, Kraft H, Baker BS, Tylzanowski P, Nelles L, Wuytens G, Su MT, Bodmer R, et al: SIP1, a novel zinc finger/homeodomain repressor, interacts with Smad proteins and binds to 5'-CACCT sequences in candidate target genes. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 20489-20498. 10.1074/jbc.274.29.20489.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Takacs CM, Amore G, Oliveri P, Poustka AJ, Wang D, Burke RD, Peterson KJ: Expression of an NK2 homeodomain gene in the apical ectoderm defines a new territory in the early sea urchin embryo. Dev Biol. 2004, 269: 152-164. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.01.023.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moses K, Ellis MC, Rubin GM: The glass gene encodes a zinc-finger protein required by Drosophila photoreceptor cells. Nature. 1989, 340: 531-536. 10.1038/340531a0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hardin PE, Angerer LM, Hardin SH, Angerer RC, Klein WH: Spec2 genes of Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Structure and differential expression in embryonic aboral ectoderm cells. J Mol Biol. 1988, 202: 417-431. 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90275-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gross JM, Peterson RE, Wu SY, McClay DR: LvTbx2/3: a T-box family transcription factor involved in formation of the oral/aboral axis of the sea urchin embryo. Development. 2003, 130: 1989-1999. 10.1242/dev.00409.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Samanta MP, Tongprasit W, Istrail S, Cameron RA, Tu Q, Davidson EH, Stolc V: The transcriptome of the sea urchin embryo. Science. 2006, 314: 960-962. 10.1126/science.1131898.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gawantka V, Pollet N, Delius H, Vingron M, Pfister R, Nitsch R, Blumenstock C, Niehrs C: Gene expression screening in Xenopus identifies molecular pathways, predicts gene function and provides a global view of embryonic patterning. Mech Dev. 1998, 77: 95-141. 10.1016/S0925-4773(98)00115-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Neidhardt L, Gasca S, Wertz K, Obermayr F, Worpenberg S, Lehrach H, Herrmann BG: Large-scale screen for genes controlling mammalian embryogenesis, using high-throughput gene expression analysis in mouse embryos. Mech Dev. 2000, 98: 77-94. 10.1016/S0925-4773(00)00453-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pollard SL, Holland PW: Evidence for 14 homeobox gene clusters in human genome ancestry. Curr Biol. 2000, 10: 1059-1062. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00676-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Candia AF, Wright CV: The expression pattern of Xenopus Mox-2 implies a role in initial mesodermal differentiation. Mech Dev. 1995, 52: 27-36. 10.1016/0925-4773(95)00384-D.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rallis C, Stamataki D, Pontikakis S, Mankoo BS, Karagogeos D: Isolation of the avian homologue of the homeobox gene Mox2 and analysis of its expression pattern in developing somites and limbs. Mech Dev. 2001, 104: 121-124. 10.1016/S0925-4773(01)00354-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jones SE, Jomary C: Secreted Frizzled-related proteins: searching for relationships and patterns. Bioessays. 2002, 24: 811-820. 10.1002/bies.10136.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yaguchi S, Yaguchi J, Burke RD: Specification of ectoderm restricts the size of the animal plate and patterns neurogenesis in sea urchin embryos. Development. 2006, 133: 2337-2346. 10.1242/dev.02396.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Duboc V, Rottinger E, Lapraz F, Besnardeau L, Lepage T: Left-right asymmetry in the sea urchin embryo is regulated by nodal signaling on the right side. Dev Cell. 2005, 9: 147-158. 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.05.008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McClay DR, Peterson RE, Range RC, Winter-Vann AM, Ferkowicz MJ: A micromere induction signal is activated by beta-catenin and acts through notch to initiate specification of secondary mesenchyme cells in the sea urchin embryo. Development. 2000, 127: 5113-5122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ruffins SW, Ettensohn CA: A fate map of the vegetal plate of the sea urchin (Lytechinus variegatus) mesenchyme blastula. Development. 1996, 122: 253-263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sherwood DR, McClay DR: LvNotch signaling mediates secondary mesenchyme specification in the sea urchin embryo. Development. 1999, 126: 1703-1713.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sweet HC, Hodor PG, Ettensohn CA: The role of micromere signaling in Notch activation and mesoderm specification during sea urchin embryogenesis. Development. 1999, 126: 5255-5265.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sweet HC, Gehring M, Ettensohn CA: LvDelta is a mesoderm-inducing signal in the sea urchin embryo and can endow blastomeres with organizer-like properties. Development. 2002, 129: 1945-1955.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chapman DL, Garvey N, Hancock S, Alexiou M, Agulnik SI, Gibson-Brown JJ, Cebra-Thomas J, Bollag RJ, Silver LM, Papaioannou VE: Expression of the T-box family genes, Tbx1-Tbx5, during early mouse development. Dev Dyn. 1996, 206: 379-390. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(199608)206:4<379::AID-AJA4>3.0.CO;2-F.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chapman DL, Cooper-Morgan A, Harrelson Z, Papaioannou VE: Critical role for Tbx6 in mesoderm specification in the mouse embryo. Mech Dev. 2003, 120: 837-847. 10.1016/S0925-4773(03)00066-2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hofmann M, Schuster-Gossler K, Watabe-Rudolph M, Aulehla A, Herrmann BG, Gossler A: WNT signaling, in synergy with T/TBX6, controls Notch signaling by regulating Dll1 expression in the presomitic mesoderm of mouse embryos. Genes Dev. 2004, 18: 2712-2717. 10.1101/gad.1248604.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chapman DL, Papaioannou VE: Three neural tubes in mouse embryos with mutations in the T-box gene Tbx6. Nature. 1998, 391: 695-697. 10.1038/35624.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ciruna B, Rossant J: FGF signaling regulates mesoderm cell fate specification and morphogenetic movement at the primitive streak. Dev Cell. 2001, 1: 37-49. 10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00017-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aulehla A, Wehrle C, Brand-Saberi B, Kemler R, Gossler A, Kanzler B, Herrmann BG: Wnt3a plays a major role in the segmentation clock controlling somitogenesis. Dev Cell. 2003, 4: 395-406. 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00055-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Walton KD, Croce JC, Glenn TD, Wu SY, McClay DR: Genomics and expression profiles of the Hedgehog and Notch signaling pathways in sea urchin development. Dev Biol. 2006, 300: 153-164. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.08.064.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shin JW, Min M, Larrieu-Lahargue F, Canron X, Kunstfeld R, Nguyen L, Henderson JE, Bikfalvi A, Detmar M, Hong YK: Prox1 promotes lineage-specific expression of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor-3 in lymphatic endothelium: a role for FGF signaling in lymphangiogenesis. Mol Biol Cell. 2006, 17: 576-584. 10.1091/mbc.E05-04-0368.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kinoshita N, Iioka H, Miyakoshi A, Ueno N: PKC delta is essential for Dishevelled function in a noncanonical Wnt pathway that regulates Xenopus convergent extension movements. Genes Dev. 2003, 17: 1663-1676. 10.1101/gad.1101303.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Davidson EH, Peterson KJ, Cameron RA: Origin of bilaterian body plans: evolution of developmental regulatory mechanisms. Science. 1995, 270: 1319-1325. 10.1126/science.270.5240.1319.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arendt D, Technau U, Wittbrodt J: Evolution of the bilaterian larval foregut. Nature. 2001, 409: 81-85. 10.1038/35051075.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kortschak RD, Samuel G, Saint R, Miller DJ: EST analysis of the cnidarian Acropora millepora reveals extensive gene loss and rapid sequence divergence in the model invertebrates. Curr Biol. 2003, 13: 2190-2195. 10.1016/j.cub.2003.11.030.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Matus DQ, Thomsen GH, Martindale MQ: Dorso/ventral genes are asymmetrically expressed and involved in germ-layer demarcation during cnidarian gastrulation. Curr Biol. 2006, 16: 499-505. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.01.052.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nemer M: An altered series of ectodermal gene expressions accompanying the reversible suspension of differentiation in the zinc-animalized sea urchin embryo. Dev Biol. 1986, 114: 214-224. 10.1016/0012-1606(86)90397-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Minokawa T, Rast JP, Arenas-Mena C, Franco CB, Davidson EH: Expression patterns of four different regulatory genes that function during sea urchin development. Gene Expr Patterns. 2004, 4: 449-456. 10.1016/j.modgep.2004.01.009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Poustka AJ, Kuhn A, Radosavljevic V, Wellenreuther R, Lehrach H, Panopoulou G: On the origin of the chordate central nervous system: expression of onecut in the sea urchin embryo. Evol Dev. 2004, 6: 227-236. 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2004.04028.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yaguchi S, Katow H: Expression of tryptophan 5-hydroxylase gene during sea urchin neurogenesis and role of serotonergic nervous system in larval behavior. J Comp Neurol. 2003, 466: 219-229. 10.1002/cne.10865.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clark MD, Panopoulou GD, Cahill DJ, Bussow K, Lehrach H: Construction and analysis of arrayed cDNA libraries. Methods Enzymol. 1999, 303: 205-233.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kahlem P, Sultan M, Herwig R, Steinfath M, Balzereit D, Eppens B, Saran NG, Pletcher MT, South ST, Stetten G, et al: Transcript level alterations reflect gene dosage effects across multiple tissues in a mouse model of down syndrome. Genome Res. 2004, 14: 1258-1267. 10.1101/gr.1951304.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Adjaye J, Huntriss J, Herwig R, BenKahla A, Brink TC, Wierling C, Hultschig C, Groth D, Yaspo ML, Picton HM, et al: Primary differentiation in the human blastocyst: comparative molecular portraits of inner cell mass and trophectoderm cells. Stem Cells. 2005, 23: 1514-1525. 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0113.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang DG, Britten RJ, Davidson EH: Maternal and embryonic provenance of a sea urchin embryo transcription factor, SpZ12-1. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1995, 4: 148-153.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- The Apache Webserver Source Page. [http://www.apache.org]
- The Sqlite Source Page. [http://www.sqlite.org]
- The CGI Script Source Page. [http://stein.cshl.org/WWW/software/CGI/]
- The PERL Programming Language Source Page. [http://www.perl.org]
- DBI Module Source Page. [http://dbi.perl.org/index.html]
- DBD Module Source Page. [http://search.cpan.org/perldoc?DBD::SQLite]
- The Sea Urchin Embryo EST Database. [http://goblet.molgen.mpg.de/cgi-bin/seaurchin-database.cgi]
- The Sea Urchin Genome Database. [http://goblet.molgen.mpg.de/cgi-bin/seaurchin-genombase.cgi]
- The Sea Urchin Genome Project Gene Annotations Database. [http://annotation.hgsc.bcm.tmc.edu/Urchin/pubLogin.html]
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.