Skip to main content

Table 3 In silico tools for assessing effects of synonymous variants on miRNA binding

From: In silico methods for predicting functional synonymous variants

Tool

Algorithm/prediction method

Output/score

Year

URL

Ref

TargetScan and Target Scan S

Sequence alignment

Weighted context +  + score (from -1 to 1). The scores with a lower negative value indicate a greater prediction of repression

2005

https://www.targetscan.org/vert_80/

[142, 143]

MinoTar

Sequence alignment and conservations scoring

Probability

2010

https://www.flyrnai.org/cgi-bin/DRSC_MinoTar.pl

[144]

Conserved

Targeting

miRDB (MirTarget)

Machine Learning (Support vector machine [SVM])

Target prediction scores between 50 and 100. A predicted target with prediction score > 80 is most likely to be real

2020

http://mirdb.org/

[145, 146]

ComiR

Machine learning (support vector machines)

Ranked vector of scores; therefore, each gene is associated with a reliability of being a target of the set of miRNAs given in input

2015 (updated in 2020 to include coding regions)

http://www.benoslab.pitt.edu/comir/help.html

[147, 148]

Diana-microT

microT-CDS algorithm

miTG score (from 0 to 1). The closer to 1, the greater the confidence

2009 (updated in 2013)

https://dianalab.e-ce.uth.gr/html/dianauniverse/index.php?r=microT_CDS

[149]

Paccmit-CDS

Ranking based on Markov model and sequence alignment

The predictions are ranked according to the P-value that the observed number of conserved and/or accessible seed matches would appear in the target sequence by chance

2015

https://paccmit.epfl.ch/

[150]

miRanda

Ranking based on seed match, conservation and free energy (G:U pairs allowed in the seed)

mirSVR score (< 0) is an estimate of the miRNA effect on the mRNA expression level. PhastCons score (0–1) measures the conservation of nucleotide positions across multiple vertebrates

2005 (updated in 2010)

https://cbio.mskcc.org/miRNA2003/miranda.html

[151, 152]

PITA

Ranking based on seed match, free energy, site accessibility and target-site abundance (G:U pairs allowed in the seed)

The predictions are ranked based on having a full match 7- or 8-mer seed and a conservation score of 0.9 or higher

2007

https://genie.weizmann.ac.il/pubs/mir07/mir07_prediction.html

[153]