Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance comparison of the binners on the real dataset evaluated by CheckM

From: MetaBinner: a high-performance and stand-alone ensemble binning method to recover individual genomes from complex microbial communities

Dataset

Methods

Metrics

  

#bins (>50% comp <10% cont)

#bins (>70% comp <10% cont)

#bins (>90% comp <10% cont)

#bins (>50% comp <5% cont)

#bins (>70% comp <5% cont)

#bins (>90% comp <5% cont)

 

CONCOCT

95

63

26

78

48

19

 

MaxBin

106

76

41

64

42

23

STEC (MEGAHIT assembly)

MetaBAT

101

60

24

92

55

22

 

VAMB

145

88

37

116

65

29

 

BMC3C

120

61

23

106

53

20

 

DAS Tool

99

71

38

78

51

26

 

MetaWRAP

155

96

33

139

81

29

 

MetaBinner

164

105

48

122

72

38

  1. The best results among all the methods are in bold, while the best results among the individual binners are italicized. The input binning results of MetaWRAP and DAS Tool are generated by CONCOCT, MaxBin, and MetaBAT. “#bins (>50% comp <10% cont)” denotes that the number of recovered bins that have >50% completeness and <10% contamination