Fig. 5

The performance of metaMIC on real metagenomic datasets. a The number of bins of different completeness with low contamination (<5%) reconstructed from original and corrected assemblies of “Ethiopian” (left) and “Madagascar” (right) cohorts. b Comparison of F1 scores for reconstructed bins before and after correction of contigs from “Ethiopian” (top) and “Madagascar” (bottom) cohorts. c An example of a predicted misassembled contig “k141_847840” assembled from combined rumen fluid and solid sample. The top plot shows the alignment result of Illumina short-read assembled contig “k141_847840” and PacBio long-read assembled contigs (“contig_982” and “contig_158”), where two regions in the “k141_84780” (1201-6738bp and 6920-8700bp) were aligned to “contig_982” and “contig_158,” respectively. The middle figure shows a snapshot of Integrative Genomics Viewer for contig “k141_847840.” The bottom plot shows the anomaly score (blue) and read breakpoint ratio (orange) across contig “k141_847840”