Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | Genome Biology

Fig. 3

From: metaMIC: reference-free misassembly identification and correction of de novo metagenomic assemblies

Fig. 3

The performance of metaMIC in localizing misassembly breakpoints on CAMI datasets. a, b The distribution of anomaly scores (a) and read breakpoint ratios (b) of different misassembly types across contigs from CAMI1-Medium. c The receiver operation curves by ALE, anomaly scores (AS), and read breakpoint ratios (RB) when discriminating error regions from error-free regions in CAMI1-Medium, respectively. d, e The distribution of error size of misassembly breakpoints recognized by metaMIC on CAMI1-Medium (Medium), CAMI1-High (High), CAMI2-Skin (Skin), CAMI2-Gut (Gut), and CAMI2-Oral (Oral) (d), and different misassembly types in CAMI1-Medium (e). f The distribution of normalized error size of misassembly breakpoints recognized by metaMIC and ALE on CAMI1-Medium

Back to article page