Table 6 Performance of VirStrain and HaROLD on 10 HCMV lab-generated benchmark datasets
From: VirStrain: a strain identification tool for RNA viruses
ID | Sample name | Actual strain present in the sample | VirStrain | HaROLD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strains detected | Predicted abundance | Strains detected | Predicted abundance | |||
1 | TA-0-1 | AD169 | Y | 100% | - | - |
2 | TA-1-0 | TB40/E | Y | 100% | - | - |
3 | TA-1-1 | TB40/E | Y | 83% | Y | 79% |
AD169 | Y | 17% | Y | 21% | ||
4 | TA-1-10 | TB40/E | Y | 56% | Y | 30% |
AD169 | Y | 44% | Y | 70% | ||
5 | TA-1-50 | TB40/E | Y | 5% | Y | 5% |
AD169 | Y | 95% | Y | 95% | ||
6 | TM-0-1 | Merlin | Y | 100% | - | - |
7 | TM-1-0 | TB40/E | Y | 100% | - | - |
8 | TM-1-1 | TB40/E | Y | 66% | N | 0% |
Merlin | Y | 34% | Y | 100% | ||
9 | TM-1-10 | TB40/E | Y | 16% | N | 0% |
Merlin | Y | 84% | Y | 100% | ||
10 | TM-1-50 | TB40/E | Y | 5% | N | 0% |
Merlin | Y | 95% | Y | 100% | ||