Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of MetaCarvel with OPERA-LG on a synthetic metagenomics datasets

From: MetaCarvel: linking assembly graph motifs to biological variants

Dataset Method Number of scaffolds Assembly size (Mbp) Misassemblies Largest scaffold (kbp) Scaffolds > 50 kbp Length at 1 Mbp (kbp) Length at 10 Mbp (kbp) Length at 50 Mbp (kbp)
MBARC-26 MEGAHIT + OPERA-LG 22,597 87.5 207 473.2 180 319.2 97.0 2.3
MEGAHIT + MetaCarvel 19,879 88.0 99 287.3 177 287.3 154.3 9.1
metaSPAdes + OPERA-LG 4931 98.7 148 2331.2 412 2055.2 944.0 177.1
metaSPAdes + MetaCarvel 5137 99.8 68 199.1 298 1810.2 1125.0 199.4
metaSPAdes scaffolds 5333 98.3 55 199.1 410 1810.2 925.6 158.3
CAMI medium MEGAHIT + OPERA-LG 157,389 271.7 1669 854.1 527 825.4 404.6 73.1
MEGAHIT + MetaCarvel 158,340 271.5 1793 854.1 520 825.4 418.2 74.5
CAMI high MEGAHIT + OPERA-LG 1,188,757 1121.8 23,224 613.6 824 581.5 299.8 96.6
MEGAHIT + MetaCarvel 1,185,065 1121.2 22,401 1089.6 847 613.6 304.5 101.8