Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of MetaCarvel with OPERA-LG on a synthetic metagenomics datasets

From: MetaCarvel: linking assembly graph motifs to biological variants

Dataset

Method

Number of scaffolds

Assembly size (Mbp)

Misassemblies

Largest scaffold (kbp)

Scaffolds > 50 kbp

Length at 1 Mbp (kbp)

Length at 10 Mbp (kbp)

Length at 50 Mbp (kbp)

MBARC-26

MEGAHIT + OPERA-LG

22,597

87.5

207

473.2

180

319.2

97.0

2.3

MEGAHIT + MetaCarvel

19,879

88.0

99

287.3

177

287.3

154.3

9.1

metaSPAdes + OPERA-LG

4931

98.7

148

2331.2

412

2055.2

944.0

177.1

metaSPAdes + MetaCarvel

5137

99.8

68

199.1

298

1810.2

1125.0

199.4

metaSPAdes scaffolds

5333

98.3

55

199.1

410

1810.2

925.6

158.3

CAMI medium

MEGAHIT + OPERA-LG

157,389

271.7

1669

854.1

527

825.4

404.6

73.1

MEGAHIT + MetaCarvel

158,340

271.5

1793

854.1

520

825.4

418.2

74.5

CAMI high

MEGAHIT + OPERA-LG

1,188,757

1121.8

23,224

613.6

824

581.5

299.8

96.6

MEGAHIT + MetaCarvel

1,185,065

1121.2

22,401

1089.6

847

613.6

304.5

101.8