Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of the accuracy of repeat detection in MetaCarvel and OPERA-LG on different datasets

From: MetaCarvel: linking assembly graph motifs to biological variants

Dataset Method True repeats Predicted repeats True positives False positives True negatives False negatives Precision (%) Recall (%)
Yersinia pestis OPERA-LG 46 353 31 322 904 15 9.06 67.39
MetaCarvel 46 222 33 189 1037 13 14.86 71.73
MBARC-26 OPERA-LG 532 771 356 415 21,215 176 47.34 66.91
MetaCarvel 532 454 438 16 21,614 94 96.47 85.33
CAMI (M) OPERA-LG 3809 4568 2989 1579 154,936 820 65.43 78.74
MetaCarvel 3809 4301 3317 984 155,531 492 77.12 87.08
CAMI (H) OPERA-LG 12,666 27,625 7078 20,547 1,157,503 5558 25.62 56.01
MetaCarvel 12,666 9219 7266 1953 1,176,067 5400 78.81 57.36