Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of the accuracy of repeat detection in MetaCarvel and OPERA-LG on different datasets

From: MetaCarvel: linking assembly graph motifs to biological variants

Dataset

Method

True repeats

Predicted repeats

True positives

False positives

True negatives

False negatives

Precision (%)

Recall (%)

Yersinia pestis

OPERA-LG

46

353

31

322

904

15

9.06

67.39

MetaCarvel

46

222

33

189

1037

13

14.86

71.73

MBARC-26

OPERA-LG

532

771

356

415

21,215

176

47.34

66.91

MetaCarvel

532

454

438

16

21,614

94

96.47

85.33

CAMI (M)

OPERA-LG

3809

4568

2989

1579

154,936

820

65.43

78.74

MetaCarvel

3809

4301

3317

984

155,531

492

77.12

87.08

CAMI (H)

OPERA-LG

12,666

27,625

7078

20,547

1,157,503

5558

25.62

56.01

MetaCarvel

12,666

9219

7266

1953

1,176,067

5400

78.81

57.36