Skip to main content

Table 1 TAD callers analyzed in this study

From: Comparison of computational methods for the identification of topologically associating domains

TAD caller

Approach

# parameters

Hierarchical domains

Inter-TAD gaps

3DNetMod

Network features

18

Overlapping

Yes

armatus

Linear score

1

Overlapping

No

arrowhead

Linear score

1

Overlapping

Yes

CaTCH

Linear score

0

Nested

No

CHDF

Clustering

2

Disjoint

No

chromoR

Linear score

2

Disjoint

No

ClusterTAD

Clustering

2

Disjoint

No

Directionality Index (DI)

Linear score

3

Disjoint

Yes

EAST

Linear score

0

Disjoint

Yes

GMAP

Linear score

0

Nested

Yes

HiCExplorer

Linear score

5

Disjoint

Yes

HiCseg

Statistical model

3

Disjoint

No

HiTAD

Linear score

0

Disjoint

Yes

ICFinder

Clustering

2

Disjoint

No

Insulation Score (IS)

Linear score

5

Disjoint

Yes

matryoshka

Linear score

1

Nested

Yes

MrTADFinder

Network features

1

Disjoint

No

PSYCHIC

Statistical model

1

Nested

No

spectral

Network features

2

Disjoint

No

TADbit

Statistical model

0

Disjoint

No

TADtree

Statistical model

6

Overlapping

No

TopDom

Linear score

1

Disjoint

Yes