Skip to main content

Table 4 Overhead of the Qtip tool

From: A tandem simulation framework for predicting mapping quality

    Time (minutes) Peak memory (gigabytes)
    Time +Qtip % inc Memory +Qtip % inc
ERR050082 Unpaired Bowtie 2 23.58 25.20 6.89 3.26 3.52 8.25
   BWA-MEM 22.18 23.75 7.08 7.53 7.79 3.40
   SNAP 12.13 13.75 13.32 29.26 29.51 0.85
  Paired Bowtie 2 57.52 61.35 6.67 3.27 3.66 12.02
   BWA-MEM 57.93 63.38 9.41 7.87 8.26 4.87
   SNAP 11.28 14.42 27.69 30.21 30.55 1.14
ERR050083 Unpaired Bowtie 2 23.02 24.75 7.55 3.26 3.53 8.28
   BWA-MEM 24.60 26.08 6.03 7.75 8.01 3.33
   SNAP 12.23 13.73 12.31 29.26 29.51 0.85
  Paired Bowtie 2 63.60 67.40 6.00 3.27 3.66 11.96
   BWA-MEM 61.58 67.52 9.62 7.92 8.31 4.83
   SNAP 11.95 14.68 22.86 30.21 30.55 1.14
  1. This is measured as the increase in running time (left) and peak memory footprint (right) from when the aligner runs by itself (Time) to when the aligner runs in combination with Qtip (+Qtip). % inc columns give the percentage increase. Times are in minutes and memory footprints are in gigabytes
Back to article page