Skip to main content

Table 1 Performance of drug sensitivity prediction using 500 features selected by ProGENI compared to 500 features selected using baseline schemes, for the LCL dataset

From: Knowledge-guided gene prioritization reveals new insights into the mechanisms of chemoresistance

Treatment

ProGENI-SVR > PCC-SVR? (FDR, PIF)

ProGENI-SVR > EN-SVR? (FDR, PIF)

Average SPCI (ProGENI-SVR)

Average SPCI (PCC-SVR)

Average SPCI (EN-SVR)

Doxorubicin

Yes (3.94E-11, 71.2%)

Yes (2.79E-38, 93.2%)

0.660

0.641

0.498

MPA

Yes (4.49E-24, 81.2%)

Yes (2.63E-12, 71.6%)

0.732

0.714

0.701

TCN

Yes (1.30E-19, 78.8%)

Yes (2.54E-5, 60.4%)

0.581

0.522

0.539

Everolimus

Yes (1.99E-8, 66%)

Yes (2.63E-12, 69.6%)

0.595

0.570

0.554

Docetaxel

Yes (1.04E-11, 68.4%)

Yes (2.84E-7, 66%)

0.608

0.585

0.579

Oxaliplatin

No (1.83E-8, 32.4%)

Yes (5.44E-12, 68%)

0.676

0.694

0.633

Epirubicin

Yes (2.99E-8, 65.6%)

Yes (1.61E-12, 66.8%)

0.646

0.628

0.571

NAPQI

Yes (1.11E-7, 66.8%)

Yes (1.47E-2, 56.4%)

0.597

0.575

0.583

Radiation

Yes (4.30E-8, 66%)

Yes (2.38E-4, 58.8%)

0.583

0.560

0.561

Carboplatin

Yes (2.66E-7, 64%)

Yes (6.67E-9, 65.2%)

0.615

0.596

0.578

MTX

No (5.52E-3, 42.4%)

Yes (2.15E-7, 64%)

0.583

0.588

0.548

Cladribine

Yes (5.68E-7, 63.6%)

Yes (2.58E-5, 62.4%)

0.622

0.602

0.597

Arac

Yes (5.51E-3, 60.45)

Yes (9.13E-8, 63.2%)

0.658

0.650

0.629

Paclitaxel

Yes (8.94E-7, 62.8%)

Yes (6.83E-5, 61.2%)

0.559

0.542

0.538

Arsenic

Yes (4.47E-6, 62.4%)

Yes (1.47E-2, 57.2%)

0.530

0.513

0.519

6MP

No (1.59E-4, 39.2%)

Yes (2.58E-5, 62.4%)

0.627

0.638

0.597

Rapamycin

Yes (3.56E-7, 61.2%)

Yes (8.23E-4, 57.6%)

0.620

0.606

0.602

6TG

No (1.62E-19, 24.8%)

Yes (5.33E-4, 60.8%)

0.717

0.746

0.694

Metformin

Similar (0.514, 48.4%)

Yes (1.87E-3, 60.4%)

0.583

0.584

0.564

Fludarabine

Similar (0.655, 46.4%)

Yes (7.54E-5, 59.2%)

0.539

0.540

0.512

TMZ

Similar (2.99E-2, 54%)

No (4.23E-3, 41.6%)

0.482

0.471

0.496

Hypoxia

Similar (0.406, 45.6%)

No (4.41E-2, 42.8%)

0.588

0.590

0.600

CDDP

No (2.01E-3, 44%)

No (5.30E-4, 39.2%)

0.602

0.607

0.621

Gemcitabine

No (1.10E-4, 37.2%)

excluded

0.739

0.745

excluded

  1. The FDR is calculated using a two-sided Wilcoxon signed rank test and corrected for multiple tests. The treatments are sorted based on the largest PIF of the improvement obtained using ProGENI compared to any of the baseline schemes. Results in the range 45% < PIF < 55% were considered similar. Gemcitabine was excluded, since for a few training sets the best model trained by EN only included the intercept