Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | Genome Biology

Fig. 3

From: PRC2 represses transcribed genes on the imprinted inactive X chromosome in mice

Fig. 3

Identification and characterization of paternal-X expression in Eed +/+, Eed fl/fl, and Eed –/– TSCs. a Summary of allele-specific RNA-seq analysis of X-linked genes. b, c Euler diagrams assessing expression from the paternal X chromosome totaling ≥ 10% of total expression in three WT Eed +/+ TSC lines and one WT Eed fl/fl TSC line (b) and in three Eed –/– TSC lines (c). d Comparison of percent paternal-X expression in Eed –/– TSC lines compared with WT TSC lines. Percent paternal-X expression for individual Eed –/– TSC lines was compared with the average percent paternal-X expression in WT TSC lines (left). e Identification of genes with statistically significant difference in percent paternal-X expression in Eed –/– TSCs compared with WT TSCs. Percent paternal-X expression in the four WT TSC lines and three Eed –/– TSC lines was compared by T-test for the 77 genes that display a consistent increase in paternal-X expression in Eed –/– TSC lines. Of these, 74 genes are statistically significantly increased in paternal-X expression in Eed –/– TSC lines, following Benjamini–Hochberg correction of the p values for multiple testing (FDR = 0.1)

Back to article page