Skip to main content

Table 2 Genotyping results obtained from exome capture data produced in this study

From: A comparative analysis of exome capture

 

Percentage

Variant

Heterozygous

Homozygous

Transition/transversion

Sample

called

number

Syn.

Non-syn.

Syn.

Non-syn.

ratio

CEU-D-NM-LN1

80.85

12,994

3,547

4,359

2,828

2,260

3.48

CEU-F-NM-LN1

79.68

12,501

3,413

4,182

2,726

2,180

3.45

CEU-M-NM-LN1

84.93

13,934

3,848

4,668

3,019

2,399

3.35

YRI-D-AG-LN1

86.38

17,214

5,161

6,082

3,266

2,705

3.44

YRI-D-AG-LN12

91.48

18,803

5,608

6,728

3,530

2,937

3.43

YRI-D-AG-LN123

93.33

19,468

5,804

6,974

3,665

3,025

3.41

YRI-D-AG-LN1234

94.17

19,719

5,869

7,061

3,708

3,081

3.41

YRI-D-AG-LN2

86.09

17,145

5,097

6,110

3,236

2,702

3.47

YRI-D-AG-LN3

86.04

17,161

5,127

6,091

3,238

2,705

3.47

YRI-D-AG-LN4

84.99

16,708

4,976

5,909

3,176

2,647

3.45

YRI-D-NM-LN1

84.27

17,146

5,014

6,273

3,272

2,587

3.47

YRI-D-NM-LN12

86.15

17,864

5,258

6,530

3,378

2,698

3.38

YRI-D-NM-LN123

86.71

18,081

5,328

6,608

3,405

2,740

3.35

YRI-D-NM-LN1234

87.01

18,208

5,376

6,642

3,426

2,764

3.33

YRI-D-NM-LN2

84.17

17,341

5,080

6,359

3,292

2,610

3.44

YRI-D-NM-LN3

84.06

17,328

5,101

6,336

3,289

2,602

3.40

YRI-D-NM-LN4

83.92

17,213

5,033

6,319

3,268

2,593

3.44

YRI-F-NM-LN1

85.26

17,389

5,006

6,217

3,446

2,720

3.38

YRI-F-NM-LN12

86.57

17,820

5,128

6,366

3,517

2,809

3.35

YRI-F-NM-LN2

84.62

17,294

4,966

6,194

3,419

2,715

3.41

YRI-M-AG-LN1

86.20

16,991

5,101

5,974

3,226

2,690

3.39

YRI-M-AG-LN12

90.97

18,452

5,523

6,539

3,501

2,889

3.36

YRI-M-AG-LN123

92.89

19,086

5,685

6,798

3,606

2,997

3.35

YRI-M-AG-LN1234

93.97

19,423

5,799

6,917

3,669

3,038

3.33

YRI-M-AG-LN2

83.48

16,095

4,859

5,619

3,059

2,558

3.37

YRI-M-AG-LN3

84.59

16,472

4,933

5,772

3,136

2,631

3.42

YRI-M-AG-LN4

85.95

16,832

5,032

5,897

3,215

2,688

3.38

YRI-M-NM-LN1

84.85

17,195

5,028

6,259

3,278

2,630

3.35

YRI-M-NM-LN12

86.33

17,742

5,219

6,458

3,358

2,707

3.29

YRI-M-NM-LN123

86.81

17,936

5,283

6,516

3,392

2,745

3.26

YRI-M-NM-LN1234

87.06

18,034

5,306

6,553

3,414

2,761

3.24

YRI-M-NM-LN2

84.52

17,222

5,043

6,271

3,285

2,623

3.35

YRI-M-NM-LN3

84.53

17,205

5,031

6,265

3,274

2,635

3.38

YRI-M-NM-LN4

84.40

17,197

5,045

6,252

3,268

2,632

3.36

  1. Sequencing lanes were arbitrarily numbered from 1 through 4, irrespective of the actual lane on the Illumina flowcell the data were generated from. Lane data merges are represented by the digits after LN (lane), with LN1 representing the data from a single lane, LN12 representing the data from the two lanes LN1 and LN2, LN123 representing the data from the three lanes LN1, LN2, and LN3, and so forth. Genotypes were assigned based on consensus quality of 50 or above [15], and the proportion of the CCDS target bases genotyped using this filter is indicated for each dataset. The extent of CCDS coverage had a direct influence on the extent of genotyping we were able to carry out with each dataset. It is also apparent that increasing raw sequence data, obtained by lane merges in this study, results in increases in the number of genotypic variants detected. The YRI individuals were found to have a greater number of variants than the CEU individuals, which has also been determined in other studies [13, 18]. Syn., synonymous.
Back to article page

Genome Biology

ISSN: 1474-760X

Contact us