Skip to main content

Table 5 Protease complements in Ich and other model organisms

From: Comparative genomics of the pathogenic ciliate Ichthyophthirius multifiliis, its free-living relatives and a host species provide insights into adoption of a parasitic lifestyle and prospects for disease control

 

Catalytic class

 

Percentage of the

Organism

Aspartic

Cysteine

Metallo

Serine

Threonine

Total

proteomea

Ichthyophthirius multifiliis

14 (5.5%)

81 (31.9%)

119 (46.9)

25 (9.9%)

15 (5.9%)

254

3.1

Paramecium tetraurelia

48 (8.3%)

225 (38.9%)

168 (29.1%)

95 (16.4%)

42 (7.3%)

578

1.5

Tetrahymena thermophila b

43 (9.0%)

211 (44.0%)

139 (28.9%)

73 (15.2%)

14 (2.9%)

480

1.7

Plasmodium falciparum

17 (10.5%)

33 (34.7%)

21 (22.1%)

16 (16.9%)

15 (15.8%)

95

1.8

Neurospora crassa

19 (8.1%)

41 (17.4%)

81 (34.5%)

75 (31.9%)

19 (8.1%)

235

2.4

Saccharomyces cerevisiae

19 (11.1%)

41 (24.0%)

57 (33.3%)

38 (22.2%)

16 (9.4%)

171

2.4

Caenorhabditis elegans

27 (5.6%)

125 (25.9%)

190 (39.4%)

115 (23.9%)

25 (5.2%)

482

2.4

Drosophila melanogaster

46 (6.2%)

86 (11.5%)

207 (27.7%)

373 (49.9%)

35 (4.7%)

747

5.4

Homo sapiens

320 (29.3%)

190 (17.4%)

252 (23.0%)

291 (26.6%)

41 (3.7%)

1,094

4.5

Arabidopsis thaliana

233 (27.6%)

162 (19.2%)

112 (13.3%)

306 (36.2%)

31(3.7%)

849

3.1

  1. Values in parentheses are the percentage of the individual catalytic class in the protease complement. aThe percentage of the whole genome that encodes putative proteases. bThe distributions of T. thermophila and P. falciparum are based on Eisen et al. [11] and Wu et al. [60], respectively. The distributions of the other model organisms are based on the results published in Merops database.