Skip to main content

Table 4 Biological relationships used in guilt-by-association GO term predictions

From: Combining guilt-by-association and guilt-by-profiling to predict Saccharomyces cerevisiaegene function

Relationship evidence type

No. of gene pairs with evidence

Sourcea

Affinity capture-MS

19,115

Gavin et al. [56]

Two-hybrid

9,598

Ito et al. [4]

Synthetic lethality

9,067

Tong et al. [57]

Synthetic growth defect

5,131

Pan et al. [58]

Biochemical activity

4,822

Ptacek et al. [59]

Affinity capture-western

3,584

Kang et al. [60]

Epistatic miniarray profile

3,416

Schuldiner et al. [61]

Dosage rescue

2,493

Gandhi et al. [62]

Synthetic rescue

1,667

Valachovic et al. [63]

Phenotypic enhancement

1,468

Myung et al. [64]

Reconstituted complex

1,345

Kus et al. [65]

Co-purification

898

Stevens et al. [66]

Phenotypic suppression

589

Mosch et al. [67]

Dosage lethality

373

Branzei et al. [68]

Co-fractionation

319

Xu et al. [69]

Co-localization

208

Shen et al. [70]

Co-crystal structure

72

Cramer et al. [71]

Protein-peptide

63

Mariño-Ramirez et al. [72]

Affinity capture-RNA

52

Tharun et al. [73]

Far western

36

Tsai et al. [74]

Dosage growth defect

33

Pan et al. [75]

FRET

32

Damelin et al. [76]

Protein-RNA

6

Gonsalvez et al. [77]

Total

55,039

 
  1. aFor each evidence type, a representative reference (the one contributing the most interactions) is shown. GO, Gene Ontology.