Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of the AAGTS and whirl-filtration strategies

From: Identifying repeat domains in large genomes

Repeat Library Number of non-redundant input POAP Fraction of input POAP in graph Difference in POAP
   AAGTS Whirl-filtration  
C. elegans RECON 148,989 0.894 0.972 11,553
Human RpeatScout 378,080 0.981 0.994 4,898
Human RepBase 666,100 0.982 0.979 -2,446
  1. We measure the difference between the procedures by the fraction of aligned positions in the input pairwise alignments that are retained in the multiple alignments produced by each graph procedure. POAP, pairs of aligned positions.