Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of statistical test results

From: A high performance test of differential gene expression for oligonucleotide arrays

 

Incidences

  

IQR for ranks

Known positives achieving rank

 

TP

FP

TN

FN

PPV

Sens

1st Q

Median

3rd Q

 

Affymetrix Latin Square (known positives per comparison = 14, total, all comparisons = 1274) (rank = 14, maximum achievable positives = 1274)

MAS5

950

13,641

1,134,051

324

7%

75%

13

36

130

335

dChip PM

1,068

14,390

1,133,302

206

7%

84%

6

19

63

558

RMA

1,098

10,406

1,137,286

176

10%

86%

5

12

38

734

logit-Exp

1,037

12,311

1,135,381

237

8%

81%

6

15

53

636

logit-ExpR

1,002

11,667

1,136,025

272

8%

79%

6

15

69

619

logit-t

1,110

345

1,147,347

164

76%

87%

4

8

13

1066

Gene Logic Spike (known positives per comparison = 10, total, all comparisons = 210)

MAS5

24

1,305

263,631

186

2%

11%

151

456

1,283

10

dChip PM

38

1,729

263,207

172

2%

18%

72

255

1,505

19

RMA

91

1,860

263,076

119

5%

43%

21

112

450

41

logit-t

106

79

264,857

104

57%

50%

4

8

21

151

Gene Logic AML (known positives per comparison = 11, total, all comparisons = 605)

MAS5

86

3,473

690,352

519

2%

14%

172

816

3,952

21

dChip PM

84

3,790

690,035

521

2%

14%

64

703

5,296

44

RMA

199

3,504

690,321

406

5%

33%

15

330

5,166

139

logit-t

263

107

693,718

342

71%

43%

4

8

738

349

Gene Logic Tonsil (known positives per comparison = 11, total, all comparisons = 726)

MAS5

239

5,854

826,736

487

4%

33%

35

127

681

81

dChip PM

307

3,760

828,830

419

8%

42%

12

49

418

180

RMA

398

4,693

827,897

328

8%

55%

7

33

653

251

logit-t

490

1,752

830,838

236

22%

67%

3

7

15

524

Gene Logic Tonsil - except two comparisons

MAS5

234

4,540

802,820

470

5%

33%

    

dChip PM

295

2,378

804,982

409

11%

42%

    

RMA

381

3,263

804,097

323

10%

54%

    

logit-t

473

116

807,244

231

80%

67%

    
  1. Spiked in RNAs are considered positives and all others considered negatives. In the Tonsil dataset, two comparisons resulted in scores much worse than others for all methods (0.75 versus 2 pM and 0.75 versus 75 pM). The last block of results had these comparisons removed. In each block, the first three rows tally t-test results on the MAS5, dChip and RMA indexes with positives having p value < 0.01. Last row tallies t-values of the Logit-t method with positives having |t| > threshold, based on df. Threshold t values correspond approximately to p < 0.01. The first four columns tally calls: TP, true positive; FP, false positive; TN, true negative; FN, false negative. The next two columns indicate performance measures: PPV, positive predictive value TP/(TP+FP); Sens, sensitivity TP/(TP+FN); IQR, Interquartile range for ranks. Ranks of statistics demarking the 1st quartile, median and 3rd quartiles for known positives. The last column shows the number of known positives achieving rank at or below the number of known positives in a comparison. The maximum achievable number for the final column is the total number of known positives for all comparisons.